What version of Oracle should I use?

Hi, Opologies for such a basic question. I am new to Oracle and need to create a fairly small database for a final year university project. The project will require me to pull information from a database using a Korne shell script running in Linux.
What version of Oracle should i download? Does this come with some sort of development tool?
Many thanks for any help that could be given!

Hi,
For using Final year College project,
you have to show your expertise and knowledge in that - correct.
my suggestion you have to go for oracle 9i.
Almost all of the company still in oralce 8, 8i.
Now changes has come from last 3 month, they are upgrading to oracle 9i.
you would be shown your knowledge in that, after completing your project, based on this.
you will get entry immediate -
Ok.
Keep in touch...
My personal email id.
[email protected],
[email protected]
with cheers from...
M.K.Thamaraiselvan.

Similar Messages

  • Hi, i have a A1186 Mac Pro 2008 Tower. Im running windows 7 64Bit on it. Im not sure about what version of bootcamp should i use to get the drivers. Someone please help me.

    Hi, i have a A1186 Mac Pro 2008 Tower. Im running windows 7 64Bit on it. Im not sure about what version of bootcamp should i use to get the drivers. Someone please help me.

    Boot Camp support:
    http://www.apple.com/support/bootcamp/
    Boot Camp FAQ:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5639?viewlocale=en_US

  • What version of firefox should i use on my macbook pro 2011

    I keep getting a message to update my computer to 3.6.16 and I think I did but the popup on my computer still says 3.6.13.  I also tried to download Firefox 4 from the Mozilla website.  I don't know what version I am really using now.  My computer is taking forever to change from one screen to another, so I'm pretty sure I screwed it up somehow.  Thanks for any help I can get.

    Your choice what version. Standard wisdom is always use the latest  and therefore most secure.  Not all add-on's are ready to go for the latest versions however.
    Message was edited by: leroydouglas

  • What version of AR should I use with Win XP to avoid App Error?

    When trying to access a pdf file, I receive the "AcroRd32.exe - Application Error." The description reads: "The exception unknown software exception (OXc0000409) occured in the application at 0X0040492a." Once I close the error, the pdf file is not an issue to open or close.
    I'm using Adobe Reader XI (11.0.03) with Win XP and read somewhere that I should be using an older version of AR, like 8 or 9. I hate to go through removing my current app without further advise. I would appreciate help with getting this error issue solved!  Thank you.

    Thank you Pat. I have disabled Protected Mode, and opened about 4 pdf files without issue, but with the next one, I received the same error message. I don't understand why this error doesn't appear when accessing every pdf file.
    As it turns out, sometimes it takes quite a while, often 2 to 5 minutes, for the error to show up. The only thing that changes in the description is the location - sometimes 0x0040122b and sometimes 0x0040492a, but it seems to show up consistently now that I know to wait.

  • What Version of Flash should I use for XP Version 2002???

    I have an older PC with base XP on it and I am having trouble installing/running flash. Can anyone tell me what version of Flash that will support my old PC running Windows XP Professional Version 2002??? Everything else is working fine except for Flash, so I don't want to get into upgrading the operating system. I have several browsers (IE, Opera, FireFox) installed and Flash will not work with any of them.  Thanks for any help.

    This is the un-install log...
    =O====== M/10.2.152.26 2011-02-15+08-39-54.281 ========
    0000 00000010 "C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\macromed\flash\FlashUtil10m_Plugin.exe"
    0001 00001036 Software\Macromedia\FlashPlayerActiveX/PlayerPath 2
    0002 00001018
    0003 00001037 SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\Adobe
    Flash Player ActiveX/ 2
    0004 00001019
    0005 00001020
    0006 00001037
    Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce/FlashPlayerUpdate 2
    0007 00001037 Software\Macromedia\FlashPlayerActiveX/ 2
    0008 00001037 Software\Macromedia\FlashPlayer/SwfInstall 2
    0009 00001037 Software\Microsoft\Code Store Database\Distribution
    Units\{D27CDB6E-AE6D-11CF-96B8-444553540000}/ 2
    0010 00001021
    0011 00001015 C:\WINDOWS\System32\Macromed\Flash\FlashUtil10m_Plugin.exe 5
    0012 00001037
    Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\RunOnce/FlashPlayerUpdate 2
    0013 00001037 Software\Macromedia\FlashPlayerPlugin/ 2
    0014 00001037 Software\Macromedia\FlashPlayer/FlashPlayerVersion 2
    0015 00001037 Software\Macromedia\FlashPlayer/SwfInstall 2
    0016 00001021
    0017 00001036 Software\Opera Software/Last CommandLine 2
    0018 00001036 Software\Opera Software/Last CommandLine 2
    0019 00001036 Software\Opera Software/Plugin Path 2
    0020 00001015 C:\WINDOWS\System32\Macromed\Flash\FlashUtil10m_Plugin.exe 5
    =X====== M/10.2.152.26 2011-02-15+08-40-16.853 ========

  • What version of iTunes should I use for my 160gb iPod classic with a 2.0.1 software?

    I have a 160gb iPod classic with a 2.0.1 software. I just had my laptop fixed and I downloaded the new iTunes but I can't sync my iPod. I think this is because it's not compatible with each other (am i right?) Well, anyway, I need to know what verstion of iTunes to use so that I can sync again on my iPod. Thank you!

    hi PT the devil advocate,
    The first reason why I'm suggesting this is because of the first question ask in this post;
    sphericalcamel wrote:
    I updated iTunes to whatever is current through software update, but when I tried to run it I was informed that it needed 10.4.9 to run (and for some reason software update didn't pick up that requirement).
    The second reason, is because you will not receive full support on older software version. Like said above, you cannot buy song with an older iTunes version.
    Beside, I said in a previous reply of this post that this is my personal preference to keep software up-to-date and that _I do understand_ that other person could prefer to stick with software version that have been proven to work well and not update. Having say this, I do not beleive that you need to play the devil's advocate here.
    Nevertheless, this is normally suggested to keep software up-to-date in order to prevent either security issue (lot of updates are for improving security) and also for bugs issue. I'm not suggesting to buy Leopard here. I'm only saying that 10.4.2 is out-dated by 9 version which are free upgrade and that at version 11, 10.4 should be quite mature now for all computer.
    For me, based on this, I do not see any reason why someone should not be running previous version than 10.4.11. If there is sleeping bugs running 10.4.3 and not 10.4.2, I'm suggesting to adress this issue instead because _there must be a solution to this_.
    In order to solve the issue, I'm just suggesting to post it on Tiger forum.

  • What version of firox should I use on a emac running 10.4.11 if so where can I find it to download

    I would like to install firefox on my mums old emac, however I am trying to find a older version of firefox that works on operating system 10.4.11. I can't seem to find a propper version that works......any ideas

    You can run the latest release version, Firefox 3.6.12, available from http://www.mozilla.com/
    http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/system-requirements.html
    Are you having problems with that version?

  • What Version of Photoshop should I use for my iMac Intel 1.8 with OSX 10.7

    I am trying to find out how far back version of PS I can use

    How would this help you?  Buying back versions on ebay is not for faint of heart as many copies counterfeit and will not work.

  • What type of restore should I use?

    My computer is properly backed up using Time Machine. I created a partition using Bootcamp so I could install Windows (I haven't actually installed Windows yet). However, after testing Parallels, which is an amazing program!, I want to get rid of the partition and use Parallels instead.
    My understanding is that I have to wipe my hard drive to erase the partition. Assuming this is true, what version of restore should I use? I want the computer to be exactly as it is in the backup, except for the partition.

    Ian Chamandy1 wrote:
    When I go into the Partition tab, the diagram and text shows my HD as having 148.73 gigs of space (it appears in blue on top in the diagram) and "available space" being 49.5 gigs (it appears in white on the bottom).
    Once you deleted the Boot Camp partition, you now have only a single partition. The light-blue shading represents the data in the partition; the white are represents the rest ("available space").
    Is this how it should be? I clicked on both the blue area and the white area but that doesn't select them. There is no line between them for me to drag. Also, the "-" and "Options" buttons are grayed out.
    If there's only one partition on the disk, the whole diagram, containing both the blue shading and white area, covering the entire disk, should be outlined in medium blue. The "-" sign is grayed-out because there's only the one partition. If there were 2 or more, you could use it to delete one.
    If you wanted to make a second partition, you would click the plus sign. DU would then change the diagram, splitting the existing partition. Then you'd see a line between the two, which you could drag up or down, etc. The Options button is used when setting-up a new or erased drive "from scratch," to specify the *Partition Map Scheme* for the entire drive.
    Browse Disk Utility's help for a general idea of what it can do. (It's one of the few apps that has fairly comprehensive explanations and instructions.)
    I should mention that I installed Parallels so I could run Windows and Mac OS simultaneously (it is quite amazing!). Could it be that Parallels creates an unlabeled partition?
    I don't do Windoze, but it's my understanding that Parallels makes one huge OSX file that contains the entire Windows system, rather than the way Boot Camp uses a separate partition. I also understand that this huge file is automatically excluded from Time Machine, so it doesn't back the whole thing up every time anything is changed. You can check this via TM Preferences > Options.

  • What XA JDBC driver should I use with Oracle 8i 8.1.6

    I need to use an XA JDBC driver for Oracle 8i 8.1.6. I am using the driver in
    a ConnectionPool in a TxDataSource for use by some entity beans using EJB 2.0.
    I'm running WebLogic Server 6.0 sp2, EJB 2.0, Java 2 SDK 1.3.1 Server VM, Solaris
    2.7, and Oracle 8i 8.1.6.
    I know of three different Oracle XA drivers: WebLogic jDriver for Oracle XA, Oracle
    OCI type 2 driver XA, and Oracle Thin tyoe 2 XA. Are there any other drivers
    that I can use for Oracle 8.1.6? Which driver and which version should I use?
    For example, can I use the Oracle 8.1.7 JDBC drivers with the Oracle 8.1.6 server,
    or would the Oracle 9i drivers work with the Oracle 8i server? Which drivers
    are faster, and which support more features? I assume that I should not use the
    type 4 driver since I am not using an applet, but I don't know if there are bugs
    in the OCI C library for Solaris or in the JDBC drivers that use it that prevent
    XA from woking. Which version of the Oracle C OCI library should I use if I use
    a type 2 driver?
    Thanks,
    Ross Goldberg

    Hi,
    I think you can't use the 8.1.6 thin driver for XA, you would have to
    use the OCI driver or 2PC-enable your datasource. AFAIK this has been
    changed for 8.1.7
    Check http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs61/////jta/thirdpartytx.html.
    Daniel
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Gene Chuang [mailto:[email protected]]
    Posted At: Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:04 AM
    Posted To: jdbc
    Conversation: What XA JDBC driver should I use with Oracle 8i 8.1.6
    Subject: Re: What XA JDBC driver should I use with Oracle 8i 8.1.6
    I've asked this question before. This is the reply from Joe
    Weinstein:
    For reliability and JDBC 2.0 compliance, I recommend the
    Oracle thin driver.
    If not that driver, you should verify that a type-2 driver
    actually does
    deliver better performance, but then I would not have a
    strong preference
    between their type-2 and ours. Theirs may be faster, and JDBC
    2.0 compliant.
    Both are succeptible to OCI bugs, some of which only they can
    fix, but we
    listen.
    Gene
    "Ross Goldberg" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    I need to use an XA JDBC driver for Oracle 8i 8.1.6. I am using thedriver in
    a ConnectionPool in a TxDataSource for use by some entity beans usingEJB 2.0.
    I'm running WebLogic Server 6.0 sp2, EJB 2.0, Java 2 SDK 1.3.1 ServerVM, Solaris
    2.7, and Oracle 8i 8.1.6.
    I know of three different Oracle XA drivers: WebLogic jDriver forOracle XA, Oracle
    OCI type 2 driver XA, and Oracle Thin tyoe 2 XA. Are there any otherdrivers
    that I can use for Oracle 8.1.6? Which driver and which versionshould I use?
    For example, can I use the Oracle 8.1.7 JDBC drivers with the Oracle8.1.6 server,
    or would the Oracle 9i drivers work with the Oracle 8i server? Whichdrivers
    are faster, and which support more features? I assume that I shouldnot use the
    type 4 driver since I am not using an applet, but I don't know ifthere are bugs
    in the OCI C library for Solaris or in the JDBC drivers that use itthat prevent
    XA from woking. Which version of the Oracle C OCI library should Iuse if I use
    a type 2 driver?
    Thanks,
    Ross Goldberg

  • What version of Oracle it's free use for linux

    Hi I want to know what version of Oracle Database it's free to use with linux OS, and how the licencing for more than two procesors is aply or it's a user licencing??
    Thanks for all...!!!

    I don't believe any edition of Oracle is free for a production application. For development purposes, you should be able to download any edition or Oracle for free.
    Of course, I'm neither a lawyer nor a representative of Oracle, so I'd suggest reading the exact license when you download the software.
    Justin

  • What version of Captivate should I be using with Windows 8.1?

    What version of Captivate should I be using with Windows 8.1? What versions are compatible? Are there any issues running Captive on a Windows 8.1 machine?

    Have you encourtered any issues, such as the preview through the browser not working?

  • Im not very tech savvy. I use firefox on my desktop, and want to run on my new Asus netbook with Windows Starter. Will FF run faster then IE? What version of FF should I install?

    Im not very tech savvy. I use firefox on my desktop, and want to run on my new Asus netbook with Windows Starter. Will FF run faster then IE? What version of FF should I install? in English
    == This happened ==
    Not sure how often
    == User Agent ==
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; MAAU; OfficeLiveConnector.1.3; OfficeLivePatch.0.0; MAAU)

    Im not very tech savvy. I use firefox on my desktop, and want to run on my new Asus netbook with Windows Starter. Will FF run faster then IE? What version of FF should I install? in English
    == This happened ==
    Not sure how often
    == User Agent ==
    Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; MAAU; OfficeLiveConnector.1.3; OfficeLivePatch.0.0; MAAU)

  • What word processing program should I use with my Mac, what word processing program should I use with my Mac, what word processing program should I use with my Mac

    what word processing program should I use with my Mac?

    steve359 wrote:
    For free you can download NeoOffice
    Not quite. Downloading the current version of NeoOffice is definitely not free (downloading the previous version is). The developers of NeoOffice (the most Mac-like of the StarOffice descendants) make a distinction between the application itself (which is free) and downloading it, for which they require what they are pleased to call a "donation" (since it's mandatory, I would call it a fee).
    shldr2thewheel wrote:
    I totally forget about TextEdit all the time..
    Indeed. For basic WP tasks, TextEdit can be quite satisfactory.
    embauerxz
    I only need it for reports
    Would that include the report on the state of the US economy -- you know, the one President Obama asked you to deliver to the White House no later than 7AM on January 4? The one in two columns, with numbered paragraphs, table of contents, footnotes, mathematical formulae, 40 figures, 60 charts, quotations in Arabic, Japanese, and classical Greek, and 15 pages of references in APA style?
    Grant Bennet-Alder is right -- "the real answer depends on what work you expect to do with it, and with whom you expect to do this work". There are dozens of word processors for Mac, from the venerable Word to the no less venerable Tex-Edit+. It would pointless to start listing them all, when many of them might be either too little or too much for your needs.

  • Version of oracle forms which uses OCI

    Anyone tell us what is the exact version of oracle forms which uses OCI

    Hello,
    Not sure but I would not be surprised that all versions use OCI connexion.
    Francois

Maybe you are looking for