Where Clause in Auto DML Fetch

Hi all,
Is it possible to restrict the data that is being returned by an automatic DML process? I have a case where I've built a master detail form that I navigate to when I select a node from a tree. If the node I chose is of a type of "x" then I only want to be able to navigate through rows of type "x" on the master form.
Thanks for your help.
Tom

I know this problem well, as it is a situation I have had to deal with very often. Unfortunately the automatically generated processes cannot be modified, and no conditions can be set against them.
The only solution to this that I found was to delete the automatically generated processes and create my own processes manually in their place. Doing this means that you can enter your own PL/SQL thus your own conditions as well. You can then set the processes to run when a specific button on the page is clicked, e.g "INSERT PROCESS" when "Create" is clicked.
There should be plenty of information on how to do this in the HTMLDB Users Guide.
I hope this helps,
Cj

Similar Messages

Using function in where clause

I have created a function as follows
create or replace FUNCTION get_codes RETURN varchar2 IS
scodes varchar2(50) := 'A1,A2';
BEGIN
scodes := '('''||REPLACE(scodes,',',''',''')||''')';
return scodes;
END;
this function returns ('A1','A2')
now i want to use this in where clause, both below statements fetches no rows
select * from tablea where code in (select get_codes from dual);
select * from tablea where code in get_codes;
but the following will fetch rows
select * from tablea where code in ('A1','A2')
how to use function in where clause
Thanks

Hi,
The code that works:
where code in ('A1','A2')is testing whther code is either of two 2-character strings, A1 or A2.
The ones that don't work, such as:
where code in get_codes;are comparing code to one 9-character string: 'A1','A2', where characters 1, 4, 6 and 9 are single-quotes. (The function can only return one value.)
You can use dynamic SQL to embed that 9-character string in part of your query, where it will be interpreted as two 2-character strrings.
[Oracle Base|http://www.oracle-base.com/articles/misc/DynamicInLists.php] and AskTom have good pages on the subject of dynamic IN-lists.
Of you can use INSTR or LIKE:
where INSTR ( get_codes
, '''' || code || ''''
) > 0

Qualifying Expression and WHERE CLAUSE Extension

I would like to know the exact difference between 'Qualifying Expression and WHERE CLAUSE Extension'. Since both are meant to contain some CONDITION that would facilitate the Edit Check's success, So I am sometimes a bit confused with these too as to when to use what.
Can someone help Please??

As you can tell from my previous posts (requests!) - I'm a newbie to OC.
From the documentation - it appears that both Qualifying expression and Where Clause work the same way but the way they execute is different.
Qualifying expression is applied after the fetch (key fields and question response data from DCM cursor i.e., after the cursor fetches the data) and Where clause filters before QG fetch.
HTH

Using where clause in Fetch Row from table

Hello,
I call Page2 from Page1, I pass PK1 to Page2.
In the section Fetch Row from Table2, I write a Where clause ( FK2 = : PK1). I have data in Table2 with FK = PK1, but I cant view the data in Page2.
Where is the error?
Thanks for help.

please recreate the problem in apex.oracle.com
please create a developer account so that you don't give your email to all the spam-bots.
MK

Nested IF Statement in WHERE clause...

Here is a really abridged sample of my package. I need to ensure that if a salesrep has a status of 'I' (for "inactive") that the next salesrep with a status of 'A' (for "active") will be selected in its place.
Should I include a nested loop within the WHERE clause? Any tips on how I should go about it? I'm a newbie...thanks for the help..
SELECT rsa.name rep_name
,rsa.attribute7 rep_phone
,rsa.arrtibute8 rep_ext
FROM ra_salesreps_all rsa
WHERE rsa.status(+) = 'A'

I'm assuming that this is part of your procedure within a package.....
You must be writing a CURSOR here....
Cursors are memory locations that can store retrieved rows and then process them one by one.
create or replace procedure my_proc
(<example_var> IN|OUT TYPE)
IS
cursor my_cursor IS
select <the fields I want>
from <sales type table>
where <my value> = 'A';
BEGIN
<how to process the cursor>
You can write the cursor process 2 ways:
1) FOR x in <name_of_cursor> LOOP
(This does whatever to the data for every record already selected by the cursor)
2) OPEN....FETCH....CLOSE
This is only scratching the surface of cursors...you need to read about these for what you are doing.
Question though...is this something you need to run for a SQL process in Oracle Applications??....if so you don't need to write a package/ procedure. You can write a cursor and load it as type SQL*PLUS, and it will run for you.
null

Function in where clause is executed and returns null instead a valid value

Hi all
i have a strange problem.
There is a access-application where i have a pass-through-sql.
This sql is fetching a foreign exchange rate from a history table which holds this rates for every day and i'm going to fetch the rate for the last day of the last month.
Example of the fraction which does not work and which i executed directly on the DB, Oracle 11.2.0.3.0:
select val
,last_day(add_months((trunc(sysdate)+3),-1)) tag
from k.obj_ts_hist th
where obj_id = 2660
and eff_date = last_day(add_months((trunc(sysdate)+3),-1))
--and eff_date = '01-mar-2013'
eff_date on table k.obj_ts_hist is defined as date.
The function last_day in the where clause leads to null for both values in the select (val and tag).
If i use eff_date = '01-mar-2013' it's all ok, i get the rigth values.
I tested some combinations of the clause, e.g.
eff_date = to_date(to_char(last_day(add_months((trunc(sysdate)+3),-1)),'YYYYMMDD'),'YYYYMMDD')
or
to_char(eff_date,'YYYYMMDD') = to_char(last_day(add_months((trunc(sysdate)+3),-1)),'YYYYMMDD') , etc., but all of them do not work.
Also i tested the clause with select ... from dual, e.g.
select eff_date from
select last_day(add_months((trunc(sysdate)+3),-1)) eff_date from dual
where eff_date = last_day(add_months((trunc(sysdate)+3),-1))
This work's !
A cross check on Oracle 9.2.0.8.0: it works as expected !
Thanks in advance for your effort.
Regards, Konrad

a little simulation of your formula
select the_date,last_day(add_months((trunc(the_date) + 3),-1)) eff_date
from (select to_date('20130224','yyyymmdd') + level - 1 the_date
 from dual
 connect by level <= 7
 )reveals you might have been querrying future rates
THE_DATE EFF_DATE
24.02.2013 31.01.2013
25.02.2013 31.01.2013
26.02.2013 28.02.2013 /* future date */
27.02.2013 28.02.2013 /* future date */
28.02.2013 28.02.2013 /* current date */
01.03.2013 28.02.2013
02.03.2013 28.02.2013Regards
Etbin

Does the 'default where clause' query select the ROWID by default ?

Hi ,
The query in default where property of a data block is as follows:
global.prim_lang = :global.user_lang
and upper(group_name) like upper('%' || :B_apply_inclusions.TI_group_desc || '%')
UNION ALL
select g.rowid, g.group_no
from table1 t,
table 2 g
where :global.prim_lang != :global.user_lang
and upper(g.group_name) = t.key(+)
and :global.user_lang = t.lang(+)
and upper(nvl(t.translated_value, g.group_name)) like upper('%' || :B_apply_inclusions.TI_group_desc || '%')
The g.rowid was added in the UNIONALL portion of the query because the first part of the query was bringing rowid as well.
We are in 10.1.2.3.0 forms version.
However for a user in forms verion 10.1.2.0.2, the query is giving an error " Unable to perform query " - due to mismatch in the number of columns selected in the query union.
because for this user, rowid is not selected as part of default where clause query( 1st part of the query before the unionalll).
If g.rowid is removed from the 2nd part of the query , it errors out in 10.1.2.3.0 forms version.
Could you kindly clarify when this rowid will also be selected by the default where clause of a block and why this issue is occuring?Is this issue related to forms version or any other property of the block? Is it is version based, is there a patch available to deal with the same?
Thanks in Advance.

You normally change the default_where block property just when you want to chnage the filter conditions for what is selected from a given block data source.
Querries with union or minus will confuse forms as to the rowid and will no longer be albe to perform the default insert/update/delete, not knowing the rowid and the table to perform the dml on.
A from clause query will be the best way to change dynamically the tables you select from and also the where. But, by using that, if you wish to insert/update/delete, you will have to use on-insert/update/delete triggers where the processing will have to rely on some primary key columns and not on rowid.
Or, instead of a from-clause, you may use a view, but that will definitely be less flexible than a from clause query.

How to retrieve the 'Where Clause' text?

Hello all,
I have created a package to retrieve all the DML's executed against the database for the day, for a particular user. DBMS_LOGMNR package was used to retrieve DMLs. But the DMLs retrieved have their 'WHERE' clause text converted to ROWID's. I need to find out the 'WHERE' clause with the parameters.
I tried retrieving values from the v$sql views, but that information is cryptic and very volatile.
Is there a way to retrieve the 'Where' clause? If not, is there a way to retrieve the 'WHERE' clause information using a trigger against the corresponding table.
I am desparately lookin'for a solution. Hope someone out there can help me out.
Regards,
Prabu Raghav.

Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the suggestion.
I am using Oracle 8i not 9i.FGA using DBMS_RLS let's me add policies and retrieve all other information about a user except the SQL statement that's executed by the user.
I want to retrieve the Current sql statement executed against the table by a particular user and record it.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Prabu Raghav.

How to set the where clause of a value set on the basis of a form field

I am using a DFF(Descriptive FlexField), which needs to display the value of a certain column(say columnA) on the basis of the value of another column(say columnB).
So i have created a value set which points to the table which has both these columns, and the DFF uses this value set. However, the problem is that I have not put any where clause in the value set, because of which i cannot handle the exact fetch returns more than one rows error.
The query has to be as follows:
select ColumnA from tbl where ColumnB = [ a form value ];
What I want to know is how can i get the value of a certain field of a certain block of the form in the above query.
Edited by: 981615 on Jan 14, 2013 12:48 AM
Edited by: 981615 on Jan 14, 2013 12:48 AM

Just have a look over these two statements if it solves your problem
one time where clause
Set_Block_Property('BLOCK_NAME',ONETIME_WHERE,your form item);
dynamic where clause
set_block_property('BLOCK_NAME'default_where, your form itme)
you can where clause at run time from any procedure or some triggers

Improve the performance in stored procedure using sql server 2008 - esp where clause in very big table - Urgent

Hi,
I am looking for inputs in tuning stored procedure using sql server 2008. l am new to performance tuning in sql,plsql and oracle. currently facing issue in stored procedure - need to increase the performance by code optmization/filtering the records using where clause in larger table., the requirement is Stored procedure generate Audit Report which is accessed by approx. 10 Admin Users typically 2-3 times a day by each Admin users.
It has got CTE ( common table expression ) which is referred 2 time within SP. This CTE is very big and fetches records from several tables without where clause. This causes several records to be fetched from DB and then needed processing. This stored procedure is running in pre prod server which has 6gb of memory and built on virtual server and the same proc ran good in prod server which has 64gb of ram with physical server (40sec). and the execution time in pre prod is 1min 9seconds which needs to be reduced upto 10secs or so will be the solution. and also the exec time differs from time to time. sometimes it is 50sec and sometimes 1min 9seconds..
Pl provide what is the best option/practise to use where clause to filter the records and tool to be used to tune the procedure like execution plan, sql profiler?? I am using toad for sqlserver 5.7. Here I see execution plan tab available while running the SP. but when i run it throws an error. Pl help and provide inputs.
Thanks,
Viji

You've asked a SQL Server question in an Oracle forum. I'm expecting that this will get locked momentarily when a moderator drops by.
Microsoft has its own forums for SQL Server, you'll have more luck over there. When you do go there, however, you'll almost certainly get more help if you can pare down the problem (or at least better explain what your code is doing). Very few people want to read hundreds of lines of code, guess what's it's supposed to do, guess what is slow, and then guess at how to improve things. Posting query plans, the results of profiling, cutting out any code that is unnecessary to the performance problem, etc. will get you much better answers.
Justin

Issue in select query with where clause

Hi guys,
I'm facing an issue while using select query with the where clause. When I'm selecting all the data from the table it returns the correct result. But when I'm using the where clause to get the specific rows from the table it returns no rows. But the data I'm trying to fetch using the where condition exists in the table.
Here is my query which causing the issue,
select * from mytable where myfield = 'myvalue'
But if I use the following query it returns the result correctly.
select * from mytable
Also the myfield value 'myvalue' exists in the table.
I have tried by running this query in both SQL Developer and SQL Plus. I have tried this query in mssql as well. It works perfectly and returns correct result sets for both the queries I have mentioned above. I'm unable to predict the issue as I'm new to ORACLE. Please help.
Thanks,
Ram.

Hi Ram,
I experienced an issue similar to this with a varchar2 field. Some of our records had a hidden newline character at the end of them, which was making queries like the one below fail:
select * from employees
where email = '[email protected]'The best way I found to detect this was to use
select 'XX'||email||'XX' from employeesTo make sure that there were no newlines. But that is just a guess. If you could provide some example table data and the outputs of your selects, it would be helpful.
Jeff

Slow split table export (R3load and WHERE clause)

For our split table exports, we used custom coded WHERE clauses. (Basically adding additional columns to the R3ta default column to take advantage of existing indexes).
The results have been good so far. Full tablescans have been eliminated and export times have gone down, in some cases, tables export times have improved by 50%.
However, our biggest table, CE1OC01 (120 GB), continues to be a bottleneck. Initially, after using the new WHERE clause, it looked like performance gains were dramatic, with export times for the first 5 packages dropping from 25-30 hours down to 1 1/2 hours.
However, after 2 hours, the remaining CE1OC01 split packages have shown no improvement. This is very odd because we are trying to determine why part of the table exports very fast, but other parts are running very slow.
Before the custom WHERE clauses, the export server had run into issues with SORTHEAP being exhausted, so we thought that might be the culprit. But that does not seem to be an issue now, since the improved WHERE clauses have reduced or eliminated excessive sorting.
I checked the access path of all the CE1OC01 packages, through EXPLAIN, and they all access the same index to return results. The execution time in EXPLAIN returns similar times for each of the packages:
CE1OC01-11: select * from CE1OC01 WHERE MANDT='212'
AND ("BELNR" > '0124727994') AND ("BELNR" <= '0131810250')
CE1OC01-19: select * from CE1OC01 WHERE MANDT='212'
AND ("BELNR" > '0181387534') AND ("BELNR" <= '0188469413')
 0 SELECT STATEMENT ( Estimated Costs = 8.448E+06 [timerons] )
|
--- 1 RETURN
 |
 --- 2 FETCH CE1OC01
 |
 ------ 3 IXSCAN CE1OC01~4 #key columns: 2
query execution time [millisec] | 333
uow elapsed time [microsec] | 429,907
total user CPU time [microsec] | 0
total system cpu time [microsec] | 0
Both queries utilize an index that has fields MANDT and BELNR. However, during R3load, CE1OC01-19 finishes in an hour and a half, whereas CE1OC01-11 can take 25-30 hours.
I am wondering if there is anything else to check on the DB2 access path side of things or if I need to start digging deeper into other aggregate load/infrastructure issues. Other tables don't seem to exhibit this behavior. There is some discrepancy between other tables' run times (for example, 2-4 hours), but those are not as dramatic as this particular table.
Another idea to test is to try and export only 5 parts of the table at a time, perhaps there is a throughput or logical limitation when all 20 of the exports are running at the same time. Or create a single column index on BELNR (default R3ta column) and see if that shows any improvement.
Anyone have any ideas on why some of the table moves fast but the rest of it moves slow?
We also notice that the "fast" parts of the table are at the very end of the table. We are wondering if perhaps the index is less fragmented in that range, a REORG or recreation of the index may do this table some good. We were hoping to squeeze as many improvements out of our export process as possible before running a full REORG on the database. This particular index (there are 5 indexes on this table) has a Cluster Ratio of 54%, so, perhaps for purposes of the export, it may make sense to REORG the table and cluster it around this particular index. By contrast, the primary key index has a Cluster Ratio of 86%.
Here is the output from our current run. The "slow" parts of the table have not completed, but they average a throughput of 0.18 MB/min, versus the "fast" parts, which average 5 MB/min, a pretty dramatic difference.
package time start date end date size MB MB/min
CE1OC01-16 10:20:37 2008-11-25 20:47 2008-11-26 07:08 417.62 0.67
CE1OC01-18 1:26:58 2008-11-25 20:47 2008-11-25 22:14 429.41 4.94
CE1OC01-17 1:26:04 2008-11-25 20:47 2008-11-25 22:13 416.38 4.84
CE1OC01-19 1:24:46 2008-11-25 20:47 2008-11-25 22:12 437.98 5.17
CE1OC01-20 1:20:51 2008-11-25 20:48 2008-11-25 22:09 435.87 5.39
CE1OC01-1 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 0.00
CE1OC01-10 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 152.25
CE1OC01-11 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 143.55
CE1OC01-12 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 145.11
CE1OC01-13 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 146.92
CE1OC01-14 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 140.00
CE1OC01-15 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 145.52
CE1OC01-2 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 184.33
CE1OC01-3 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 183.34
CE1OC01-4 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 158.62
CE1OC01-5 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 157.09
CE1OC01-6 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 150.41
CE1OC01-7 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 175.29
CE1OC01-8 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 150.55
CE1OC01-9 0:00:00 2008-11-25 20:48 154.84

Hi all, thanks for the quick and extremely helpful answers.
Beck,
Thanks for the health check. We are exporting the entire table in parallel, so all the exports begin at the same time. Regarding the SORTHEAP, we initially thought that might be our problem, because we were running out of SORTHEAP on the source database server. Looks like for this run, and the previous run, SORTHEAP has remained available and has not overrun. That's what was so confusing, because this looked like a buffer overrun.
Ralph,
The WHERE technique you provided worked perfectly. Our export times have improved dramatically by switching to the forced full tablescan. Being always trained to eliminate full tablescans, it seems counterintuitive at first, but, given the nature of the export query, combined with the unsorted export, it now makes total sense why the tablescan works so much better.
Looks like you were right, in this case, the index adds too much additional overhead, and especially since our Cluster Ratio was terrible (in the 50% range), so the index was definitely working against us, by bouncing all over the place to pull the data out.
We're going to look at some of our other long running tables and see if this technique improves runtimes on them as well.
Thanks so much, that helped us out tremendously. We will verify the data from source to target matches up 1 for 1 by running a consistency check.
Look at the throughput difference between the previous run and the current run:
package time start date end date size MB MB/min
CE1OC01-11 40:14:47 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 11:58 437.27 0.18
CE1OC01-14 39:59:51 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 11:43 427.60 0.18
CE1OC01-12 39:58:37 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 11:42 430.66 0.18
CE1OC01-13 39:51:27 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 11:35 421.09 0.18
CE1OC01-15 39:49:50 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 11:33 426.54 0.18
CE1OC01-10 39:33:57 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 11:17 429.44 0.18
CE1OC01-8 39:27:58 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 11:11 417.62 0.18
CE1OC01-6 39:02:18 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 10:45 416.35 0.18
CE1OC01-5 38:53:09 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 10:36 413.29 0.18
CE1OC01-4 38:52:34 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 10:36 424.06 0.18
CE1OC01-9 38:48:09 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 10:31 416.89 0.18
CE1OC01-3 38:21:51 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 10:05 428.16 0.19
CE1OC01-2 36:02:27 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 07:46 409.05 0.19
CE1OC01-7 33:35:42 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 05:19 414.24 0.21
CE1OC01-16 9:33:14 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-21 05:16 417.62 0.73
CE1OC01-17 1:20:01 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-20 21:03 416.38 5.20
CE1OC01-18 1:19:29 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-20 21:03 429.41 5.40
CE1OC01-19 1:16:13 2008-11-20 19:44 2008-11-20 21:00 437.98 5.75
CE1OC01-20 1:14:06 2008-11-20 19:49 2008-11-20 21:03 435.87 5.88
PLPO 0:52:14 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-20 20:35 92.70 1.77
BCST_SR 0:05:12 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-20 19:48 29.39 5.65
CE1OC01-1 0:00:00 2008-11-20 19:43 0.00
 558:13:06 2008-11-20 19:43 2008-11-22 11:58 8171.62
package time start date end date size MB MB/min
CE1OC01-9 9:11:58 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-02 05:26 1172.12 2.12
CE1OC01-5 9:11:48 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-02 05:25 1174.64 2.13
CE1OC01-4 9:11:32 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-02 05:25 1174.51 2.13
CE1OC01-8 9:09:24 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-02 05:23 1172.49 2.13
CE1OC01-1 9:05:55 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-02 05:20 1188.43 2.18
CE1OC01-2 9:00:47 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-02 05:14 1184.52 2.19
CE1OC01-7 8:54:06 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-02 05:08 1173.23 2.20
CE1OC01-3 8:52:22 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-02 05:06 1179.91 2.22
CE1OC01-10 8:45:09 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-02 04:59 1171.90 2.23
CE1OC01-6 8:28:10 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-02 04:42 1172.46 2.31
PLPO 0:25:16 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-01 20:39 92.70 3.67
 90:16:27 2008-12-01 20:14 2008-12-02 05:26 11856.91

How to use string operation in where clause of select query

Hello All,
I just want to know how can i write a restriction in select query saying retrive data only begins with name "DE*".
Explaination: If my table has records and names starts with character then i want to write a query to fetch all the records in which names starts with DE*.
Thanks in advance for your quick reply...
Dev.

Hi
In the where clause you need to write like
WHERE NAME LIKE 'DE%'
Regards
Sudheer

Using Parameters in SQL-Query not only in where clauses

Hi,
I try to use Publisher parameters in the SQL Query from a Data Set.
All of them have default values.
So far, this is no problem, unless I try to use such a parameter value as an ordinary attribute value:
>
select
 case when (:pv_Group = 'no') then "DM15D_BETRIEBSTEIL"."BETR_TEIL"
 else :pv_some_Text end as Betr_Teil,
 case when (:pv_Group = 'no') then "DM15D_BETRIEBSTEIL"."SUVA_NR_FORM"
 else :pv_some_Text end as Suva_Nr,
 case when (:pv_Group = 'no') then "DM15K_RIS_FAKTEN_PRO_BTT_JHR"."RIS_VOLLBESCH"
 else sum("DM15K_RIS_FAKTEN_PRO_BTT_JHR"."RIS_VOLLBESCH") end as Vollbesch
from "GDWH05"
where
 "DM15D_BETRIEBSTEIL"."SUVA_NR_FORM" in (:pv_nim100)
 fetch first 65001 rows ONLY
>
The parameters 'pv_Group' and 'pv_nim100' are working fine. (when or where clauses)
The parameter 'pv_some_Text' unfortunately not. (simple literals)
When I try to validate the above SQL, I get the following Error:

java.io.IOException: prepare query failed[nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 46033] Datatype: 25 is not supported.

After use a cast function:
>
else CAST(:pv_some_Text AS CHARACTER)
>
I get this ERROR:

java.io.IOException: prepare query failed[nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 19002] Incorrect use of parameters. The parameters used in CAST cannot be resolved without ambiguity.

We use OBIEE 11.1.1.6.4 on a Win64-System.
Thank's for any help.

Hi Alex,
let's leave away any unnecessary details.
This is the SQL, inserted in the window 'Edit Data Set' of BIP Data Model:
>
select
 '--1' as Betr_Teil,
 '--2' as Suva_Nr,
 sum("GDWH05"."DM15K_RIS_FAKTEN_PRO_BTT_JHR"."RIS_VOLLBESCH") as Vollbesch
from "GDWH05"
where
 "DM15D_BETRIEBSTEIL"."SUVA_NR_FORM" in ('122-4.4')
 fetch first 65001 rows ONLY
>
Everything is fine when I click OK, the script goes back to the metadata.
Let's try this script with bind values in ORACLE SQL Developer.
This SQL is the physical part, found in the OBIEE-Log (Log level 5), except the bind values. Therefore we find, in the where clause, the join. In the logical sql, we don't have to join, because it's handled in the Common Enterprise Information Model (CEIM)
>
with
sawith0 as
select
sum(t39617.ris_vollbesch) as c1
from
dm15d_betriebsteil t39455,
dm15k_ris_fakten_pro_btt_jhr t39617
where
t39455.id_betriebsteil = t39617.id_betriebsteil
and t39455.suva_nr_form = '122-4.4'
select
d1.c1 as c1,
d1.c2 as c2,
d1.c3 as c3
from
select
:pv_some_text as c1,
:pv_some_text as c2,
sum(d1.c1) as c3
from
sawith0 d1
d1
where
rownum <= 65001
>
This SQL works fine, even with bind values for 'pv_some_text'.
But, when using the following SQL in the BIP Data Model:
>
select
 :pv_Text as Betr_Teil,
 :pv_Text as Suva_Nr,
 sum("GDWH05"."DM15K_RIS_FAKTEN_PRO_BTT_JHR"."RIS_VOLLBESCH") as Vollbesch
from "GDWH05"
where
 "DM15D_BETRIEBSTEIL"."SUVA_NR_FORM" in ('122-4.4')
 fetch first 65001 rows ONLY
>
The following ERROR occurs:
java.io.IOException: prepare query failed[nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 46008] Internal error: File server\Query\Optimizer\ServiceInterfaceMgr\Utility\Src\SQOIUTypeVisitor.cpp, line 643.
In my opinion, either I use a wrong syntax, or BIP has a problem with parsing the script.
Thank you for your most welcome help.

WHERE clause text.

Hello all,
I have created a package to retrieve all the DML's executed against the database for the day, for a particular user. DBMS_LOGMNR package was used to retrieve DMLs. But the DMLs retrieved have their 'WHERE' clause text converted to ROWID's. I need to find out the 'WHERE' clause with the parameters.
I tried retrieving values from the v$sql views, but that information is cryptic and very volatile.
Is there a way to retrieve the 'Where' clause? If not, is there a way to retrieve the 'WHERE' clause information using a trigger against the corresponding table.
I am using oracle 8i and tried SYS_CONTEXT current_sql parameter. But Current_sql is not available in 8i, it's from 9i onwards.
I am desparately lookin'for a solution. Hope someone out there can help me out.
Regards,
Prabu Raghav.

Hi Andrew,
Thanks for the suggestion.
I am using Oracle 8i not 9i.FGA using DBMS_RLS let's me add policies and retrieve all other information about a user except the SQL statement that's executed by the user.
I want to retrieve the Current sql statement executed against the table by a particular user and record it.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Prabu Raghav.

Where Clause in Auto DML Fetch

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for