Where is a process flow's Execution details - Log section stored ?

Hi,
We're using OWB 11.2.0.1.7.
I want to know where in the database the Execution Details for a process flow is stored.
When i run a process flow with a Java Activity, or a User Defined Activity, and it halts with an Error i can inspect what went wrong in the process flow by opening the job in the Control Center client.
I doubleclick on the name of the job in the Control Center, the Job Details window opens.
I click on the first node, that is the name of the Job(process flow).
Then you click on the blue I aka 'Display Details'.
That window has a tab called Log.
The Log tab shows information that Java/Userdefined activity returns.
(In my case return info from a javabased xmlparser, or exitinfo from a shell command.)
This is the only place where i can find this info unfortunately.
I want to know where this info is stored in the database. I tried the runtime audit vews such as:
select e.*, m.*, l.*
from owbsys.wb_rtv_audit_executions e
LEFT JOIN owbsys.wb_rtv_audit_messages m ON e.audit_execution_id = m.audit_execution_id
LEFT JOIN owbsys.wb_rtv_audit_message_lines l ON l.audit_message_id = m.audit_message_id
left join owbsys.wb_rtv_audit_message_params p on p.audit_message_line_id = l.audit_message_line_id
But although i can see my processflow i can not find the Log information here.
Can someone tell me where this info is stored ?
Edited by: MichaelR64 on 6-apr-2011 14:01

Hi Michael
The standard output and error streams for the Java activities are stored in
-> ALL_RT_AUDIT_EXEC_FILES
Is this what you are after?
You can see the doc for it in the runtime public views section;
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/owb.112/e10584/api_2runviews.htm#i707034
The FILE_TYPE column will be set ot JavaErrorStream for example, with the information that was written to the Java std error stream, and JavaOutputStream will have the Java std output stream. This same technique is used for other activities - SQLPlus, SQLLoader, FTP.
Cheers
David

Similar Messages

Problem with execution of process flow

Hello! I'm new in OWB, and I hope you will help me.
I started execution of process flow and then connection to my server failed.
The problem is: In Runtime Audit Browser all mappings are complete, but process flow is in "Busy" status. I waited for 24h, and nothing changed. (execution of mappings costed 4h).
what should I do?

Hi,
Use any SQL tool like TOAD and see from the backend if the OWB process is running, if it is still running, kill it. Due to server connection failure the OWB process might have been killed but the Runtime Browser might show it as busy.
Go the Workflow Repository Schema and run the following query:
update wf_item_activity_statuses set activity_status = 'COMPLETE'
where item_type = <Your Process Flow Package Name> and actvity_status != 'COMPLETE'.
This should solve the problem.
Regards
-AP

10GR2 - Cannot get wb_rt_api_exec to execute a Process Flow

Hi,
In version 10.1.3, I was able to use the wb_rt_api_exec procedure to execute process flows within a stored procedure (and called by an Enterprise Manager job).
I have tried something similar in 10GR2, but when I run stored procedure, it says it has executed successfully, but the process flow has not run.
My Stored procedure code is like:-
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE PROC_TEST IS
ret NUMBER;
BEGIN
ret:= rep_owner.wb_rt_api_exec.run_task('PROCESS_LOCATION','PROCESS','WF_TEST','','',1,1);
END PROC_TEST;
I have noticed there is an extra parameter p_background at the end of the run_task function and was not sure if I am setting it correctly. The procedure compiles ok, but does not run the process flow.
Can anyone help please?
Thanks
GB

To run workflow from SQLPLUS I used the following script:
set serveroutput on
variable exec_return_code number;
begin
-- Initialize Return Code
:exec_return_code := rep_ISM_DEV2.wb_rt_api_exec.RESULT_FAILURE;
-- Run Task
:exec_return_code := rep_ism_dev2.wb_rt_api_exec.run_task('OWF_LOCATION','PROCESS','ALL_MARTS_PF', ' ' );
end;
Prior to running this script I have
1. grant execute on rep_owner.WB_RT_API_EXEC to rep_user;
2. OWF_MGR is registered as Repository user.
It is possible that you will get an error: PE-02018: Oracle Workflow schema OWF_MGR on host XXX.XX.XX.XX cannot be accessed using service ORCL through port 1521. Please check the location details and try again.
To overcome this problem log in to OWB Control Center as the target User (Runtime user) and executed the PF package from there manually. You will get a message that OWF_MGR location was registered by other user and you will get asked to supply the OWF_MGR password. The manual execution should finish normally. After that I am able to run the PF from a command line without problems. It looks like running the PF from the control center stores the OWF_MGR login information somewhere (anybody knows where?) and you do not need to supply it any longer.
Hope it helps.
Vladimir

Mapping runs through Deployment Manager but hangs in Process Flow

Hi,
I have a Mapping bound in a simple Process Flow.
The mapping deploys through Deployment Manager and runs. It currently processes no rows and takes a couple of seconds to do that. It completes with a Success message.
However, when I wrap it into a simple Process Flow...
--- w ---> END_WARNING
START ---> MY_MAPPING ---- s ---> END_SUCCESS
--- e ---> END_ERROR
.., deploy this and run it through the Deployment Manager, it hangs. I get the 'Execution in progress...' window with the moving graphic forever.
The Runtime Repository Browser Execution Report tells me that it is 'Busy', and if I drill down to the Process Flow Run Execution Report, I see an identical Start and End Time, an Elapsed Time of 0 seconds, and no other details (Execution Parameters, Activity Details or Error Messages).
Looking under 'Find Processes' on the Workflow Home Page, my workflow has no status in the Process List. Drilling down to the Diagram, I have a green line from the 'Start' element to my Mapping but the Mapping itself has no special colour.
I go back to the Deployment Manager and cancel the job - which it does and reports that it 'Completed with errors'.
The Runtime Repository Browser Execution Report now tells me that it is 'Busy' (with an information bubble), and if I drill down to the Process Flow Run Execution Report, I see different Start and End Times, and Elapsed Time of n seconds, a single Error Message 'RPE-01002: The operation was aborted at user request.', and no other details (Execution Parameters, Activity Details).
Looking under 'Find Processes' on the Workflow Home Page, my workflow has a status of 'Complete' in the Process LIst. Drilling down to the Diagram, I still have a green line from the 'Start' element to my Mapping and the Mapping itself still has no colour and no indication that it has stopped.
I'm running:
Oracle9i EE 9.2.0.5.0
Oracle10g OWB Client 10.2.0.1.0
Oracle10g OWB Repository 10.1.0.1.0
Anybody know how I can go about tracking down why this Process Flow is hanging - and, of course, getting it unhung :-)
Regards
Steve

Hello Steve,
It's a little difficult to read the exact flow from your ASCII graphics.
However, from your description it seems your workflow task only has an outgoing success connector, and your execution was not a success. This will stop the execution of that branch of your process flow, since there are no valid routes to take. If you only have a single branch in your workflow, the process flow is stuck.
To expedite your hung process you just click on the task icon in the Workflow Monitor graph window that does not have a green outgoing connector, press the Expedite button and select skip.
Corollary: If you use conditional connectors, always use all 3 from a task. I not using all 3, have a very good understanding of why you don't.
Regards, Hans Henrik

Audit_id of a process flow

OK, i know this is basic, but I am new to OWB. How do I get the audit_id of a process flow at execution time? I am running OWB 10.2.0.1. The Transformation Guide as well as the User's Guide says that "you can obtain the audit ID at execution time using the pseudo variable audit_id" when using the Control Center Transformations, but all of their examples use hardcoded audit_id's. There doesn't seem to be any other mention of "pseudo variable" in any of the other OWB documentation.
thanks in advance

Hi
See the global expression values below, you can use PARENT_AUDIT_ID to get the calling process flows audit id:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/owb.111/b31278/concept_processflows.htm#CHDEJBGF
Cheers
David

Process flow/map performance issues

We have some issues with our OWB-based application and we're looking to find out if there are different ways we could be using the tool, or features/options we've missed.
We are trying to maintain a near real time feed of data from a front end system into our warehouse which was built using OWB 10.2.0.3 over a 10.2.0.4 database. The bulk of the application consists of OWB maps with a few hand-written PL/SQL objects, all executed in a series of hierachical OWB process flows. Maps/transformations are executed either sequentially or in parallel where the referential integrity of the model allows.
The problem is that we have around 150 tables in the datamart which could potentially require updating on each refresh cycle, although in practice only a few tables have any activity on a typical refresh cycle. The cycle consists of loading data into a set of staging tables, and from there the data is transformed into the main schema, often with multiple maps per target table.
On every cycle we run hundreds of maps, the vast majority of which process zero rows. Each map runs quickly and efficiently in its own right but collectively they add up to a 5 - 10 min cycle even if there is no data to process.
There are 2 avenues which we'd like to explore and would be grateful if anyone could provide any pointers/suggestions :-
1) It appears that each map opens and closes its own database session when it executes. I presume this was done because a single process flow could be constructed with maps executing in different target schemas, but we know that's not the case for us. We'd like to know if there is anyway to configure the database connection at a higher level (eg. process flow) so it opens a connection once and executes each of the maps (database packages) in that one session.
Our DBAs are experimenting with 'shared server' settings at a database level which may help to some degree but won't be the whole story.
2) Another option is simply to run less maps eg. load the staging area as now, collate stats on which staging tables contain new data, and then apply some logic such that subsequent maps only execute if the relevant staging table(s) contain(s) some new data, otherwise bypass that map.
We tried experimenting with the 'Pre Mapping Process' operator, but essentially that just generates another function call from the map package, so we still have the overhead of opening a database session for each map to run the package. Minimal gain.
We thought about adding a function call in the process flow before each map and then branching to either execute/bypass the map as approriate, but the function call still requires opening/closing of a database session each time so, once again, minimal gain.
What we really want is some way for a map or process flow to check without logging onto the database repeatedly.
Any ideas on the above, or other potential solutions anyone could suggest, would be greatly appreciated.

Hi,
Please see if these documents help.
Note: 554635.1 - Create Accounting Process Performs Poorly When 100K + Distributions are Passed for an Event
Note: 954273.1 - Multiple Create Accounting Requests Result In Poor Performance For Online Accruals
Note: 763500.1 - R12: Performance Issue with Create Accounting
Note: 733637.1 - R12:Performance Issue When Running Accounting Program Xlaaccup
Note: 781311.1 - Create Accounting Process Taking A Long Time To Complete After Appying Critical Patches
Note: 557869.1 - EBS: R12 Oracle Financials Critical Patches
Regards,
Hussein

SQLPLUS Acitivity in process flow Input parameters to the script

I have a sqlplus Activity in the process flow. In the script section I have a update statement which has a where clause where I need to pass a date field as input paramter to this script to compare and update the records.
Is there a way to pass Input Parameters to the script.
update test
set last_name = 'TEST'
where trunc(begin_date) = :begin_date;
Begin_date is a variable in my process flow which I need to pass to this script.
Any ideas as to how I can accomplish this.
Thanks in advance.

You can Create a procedure of the Update statement with one input paramenter like
Create Or replace procedure Update_test ( p_begin_date date )
IS
update test
set last_name = 'TEST'
where trunc(begin_date) = p_begin_date;
End;Then call this Procedure in the Process Flow and give input parameter from PF variable.
Cheers
Nawneet

Locking source tables during process flow

Hi All,
I have a process flow which calls multiple mappings and stored procedures. I pull data from source located in different database and insert data into current database. Since, this migration is delta migration, I want to make sure that during migration, no user should add data into source till migration is successfully completed.
I had called a procedure which locks individual tables, but as soon as next mapping is completed the lock gets released, since each mappings commits data. I want that the lock should be active till all mappings gets completed.
Regards,
Danish

Commit will release all locks. Therefor, no matter how you lock the table, the lock will release when you commit the map. An alternative might be to capture a frozen image of the data into a local GTT created with the on commit preserve rows option.

OWB11gR2: Mapping execution in a process flow not visible in OWB Browser

When a mapping is executed inside a process flow, execution details are not visible in OWB Repository Browser (Control Center reports) - rows processed, errors etc. Mapping row is missing in a log, like it never happened (but it did).
This auditing information is very important for monitoring reasons (to our customers also) and I just don't get it how this functionality is lost with this version. Another serious bug?

Hi David,
I was rather tired and frustrated last evening, so today I noticed some things I didn't yesterday. Your reply gave me a new motivation.
The conclusion is - a mapping execution in a process flow is logged, but the way activities are displayed in OWB Browser are now different than in previous versions. If I click on 'Execution Job Report' on a process flow, I see all the activities listed except mappings (transformations, assign, file exists, subprocess etc.). If I want to see mapping execution row, I must click on a plus (expand) sign.
This kind of behavior will make processes with a complex hierarchy (usually we have more than 5 levels of subprocesses) rather vast to monitor. In 10gR2, a drilling down was accomplished by opening a new browser tab (Execution Job Report link) for each subprocess/mapping activity. Now it shall remain on one huge screen (list) that keeps expanding.
But, if that is the new feature, we shall live with that. If our customers won't like it, they will have to get used to it.
Thank you for your reply!

Skipping mapping execution in process flow

I have a process flow that calls multiple mappings. Based on some condition I want a mapping not to execute, E.g. when rerunning the process flow in case of failure. Currently I keep track of mapping execution and store the status in a control table. When a mapping has completed, it updates the status as completed. When I need to rerun, in the SQL of the tables join in the mapping, I have a where clause that returns 0 rows (mapping_completed = N) . So mapping is excuted but no rows added/updated.
The flip side of the approach is when using a complex join specially using views, the SQL takes a long time to run only to return 0 rows. So logic is okay but I want to save time by avoiding the execution of the mapping it self.
I would like to know how others are implementing this scenario.
Regards
Sandeep

Can you not have two different mappings one for running it first time and one which you can run on failure...
In your process flow you can have a param i.e 'F for failure and 'I' for intial and based on this condition you can decide which mapping to invoke and hte path to be followed.

Process Flow Execution via PL-SQL

Hi Experts,
I am trying to execute the Process Flow, however i am unable to execute it via pl-sql method. I followed the method as described in the below link:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B31080_01/doc/owb.102/b28225/api_4sqlforjobs.htm#BABBHEHI
Example:
sqlplus scott/tiger@orcl @sqlplus_exec_template OWB_REPO_OWNER.OWB_REPO OWF_MGR PROCESSFLOW PF1 "," ","
I get below error message.
SP2-0310: unable to open file "sqlplus_exec_template.sql"
Details:
OWB_OWNER: OWB_REPO_OWNER
OWB_USER: OWB_PROD
OWB_WORKSPACE: OWB_REPO
OWF_MGR is the workflow manager.
PF1 is the Process Flow
Please tell me where am i going wrong.
Regards,+
Ravi R+

Thanx Sutirtha
I found the other way round
BEGIN+
owbsys.wb_workspace_management.set_workspace('OWB_REPO','OWB_REPO_OWNER');+
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Result: ' || TO_CHAR(owbsys.wb_rt_api_exec.run_task('PF_MOD_LOCATION1','PROCESS','PF1', null, null, 1)));+
END;+
where
OWB_REPO is the workspace
OWB_REPO_OWNER is the OWB Owner.
PF1 is the name of my process flow

How to check mappings execution time in Process flow

Hi All,
We created one process flow and scheduled it. It is successfully completed after 30 Minutes.
Process flows contains 3 mappings, First mapping complete sucessfully, Second mapping will start, after completing successfully second mapping. Third mapping will start and complete sucessfully. Success emails will generate.
I would like to know which mapping is taking long time execution.
Could you please suggest how can we find which mapping is taking long time execution.
I dont like to run each mapping indiviual and see the execution time.
Regards,
Ava.

Execute the below query in OWB owner or User schema
In place of '11111' give the execution id from control center.
select Map_run.NUMBER_RECORDS_INSERTED,
map_run.NUMBER_RECORDS_MERGED ,
map_run.NUMBER_RECORDS_UPDATED ,exe.execution_audit_id, Exe.ELAPSE_TIME,exe.EXECUTION_NAME,exe.EXECUTION_AUDIT_STATUS,map_run.MAP_NAME
from ALL_RT_AUDIT_MAP_RUNS Map_run,ALL_RT_AUDIT_EXECUTIONS Exe
where   exe.EXECUTION_AUDIT_ID=map_run.EXECUTION_AUDIT_ID(+)
        and exe.execution_audit_id > '11111'
        order by exe.execution_audit_id descCheers
Nawneet
Edited by: Nawneet on Feb 22, 2010 4:26 AM

Process flow stuck while execution - Fork being used

Hi,
We are using fork feature in the process flow. Three mappings are being forked; if all the 3 are successfully completed, then the 'END_SUCCESS' needs to be reached. This is done by routing the success transition from 3 mappings to the 'AND' process and then from 'AND' to 'END_SUCCESS'. If any one of the mapping fails, the 'END_FAILURE' needs to be reached. This is done by routing the success transition from 3 mappings to the 'OR' process and then from 'OR' to 'END_FAILURE'.
When this process flow is executed, 2 mappings are successfully completed; the third one is completed with errors. While viewing from workflow monitor, the success routes are clearly shown but the failure route is not shown. In the runtime audit browser, the mapping details are correctly shown (2 mappings with success and the third one with failure). The process flow is shown having a status of 'BUSY'. The process flow keeps on waiting and does not get completed/aborted automatically.
Is there something which I have missed in the process flow?
Thanks in advance,

Reposting as there was a mistake in my previous posting:
Hi,
We are using fork feature in the process flow. Three mappings are being forked; if all the 3 are successfully completed, then the 'END_SUCCESS' needs to be reached. This is done by routing the success transition from 3 mappings to the 'AND' process and then from 'AND' to 'END_SUCCESS'. If any one of the mapping fails, the 'END_FAILURE' needs to be reached. This is done by routing the failure transition from 3 mappings to the 'OR' process and then from 'OR' to 'END_FAILURE'.
When this process flow is executed, 2 mappings are successfully completed; the third one is completed with errors. While viewing from workflow monitor, the success routes are clearly shown but the failure route is not shown. In the runtime audit browser, the mapping details are correctly shown (2 mappings with success and the third one with failure). The process flow is shown having a status of 'BUSY'. The process flow keeps on waiting and does not get completed/aborted automatically.
Is there something which I have missed in the process flow?
Thanks in advance,

Process Flow log shows RPE-01003 on mapping execution

Process Flow log shows this following error mappings execution:
oracle.wh.runtime.platform.adapter.InfrastructureException: RPE-01003: An infrastructure condition prevented the request from completing.
- no rows found for select into statement
The Process Flow never recover from this error - owb_owner.all_rt_audit_executions shows the mapping in BUSY and I have to manually abort the process flow to recover.
Steps to Reproduce Problem:
We recently upgrade our test system from *10.2 into 11.1* and OWB client from *10.2.0.3 into 10.2.0.4*
During the upgrade DBA update OWB location setting into 11.1
After the upgrade, I re-deploy several Process Flows, but I did not re-deploy mappings that get call by the PF
When I run the PF, the mapping was stuck in 'BUSY' status (owb_owner.all_rt_audit_executions)
When i check the log it shows this following error:
oracle.wh.runtime.platform.adapter.InfrastructureException: RPE-01003: An infrastructure condition prevented the request from completing.
- no rows found for select into statement
Full log:
2009/04/23-12:33:10-CDT [1FA1BB6] Initializing execution for auditId= 2702852 parentAuditId= 2702837 topLevelAuditId=2702837 taskName= NIHUB_NI_ZWEB_PF:NIHUB_NIUP_ADDR_TYPES_ZWEB_MAP
2009/04/23-12:33:10-CDT [1FA1BB6] oracle.wh.runtime.platform.adapter.InfrastructureException: RPE-01003: An infrastructure condition prevented the request from completing.
- no rows found for select into statement
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionContextImpl.initialize(ExecutionContextImpl.java:1505)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionController.initialize(ExecutionController.java:32)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionController.execute(ExecutionController.java:50)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionController.execute(ExecutionController.java:23)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.ExecutionManager.run(ExecutionManager.java:36)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: no rows found for select into statement
     at sqlj.runtime.error.Errors.raiseError(Errors.java:118)
     at sqlj.runtime.error.Errors.raiseError(Errors.java:60)
     at sqlj.runtime.error.RuntimeRefErrors.raise_NO_ROW_SELECT_INTO(RuntimeRefErrors.java:62)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionContextImpl.initialize(ExecutionContextImpl.java:1482)
     ... 5 more
java.sql.SQLException: no rows found for select into statement
     at sqlj.runtime.error.Errors.raiseError(Errors.java:118)
     at sqlj.runtime.error.Errors.raiseError(Errors.java:60)
     at sqlj.runtime.error.RuntimeRefErrors.raise_NO_ROW_SELECT_INTO(RuntimeRefErrors.java:62)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionContextImpl.initialize(ExecutionContextImpl.java:1482)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionController.initialize(ExecutionController.java:32)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionController.execute(ExecutionController.java:50)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionController.execute(ExecutionController.java:23)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.ExecutionManager.run(ExecutionManager.java:36)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
2009/04/23-12:33:10-CDT [1FA1BB6] Thread terminating due to fatal exception of type oracle.wh.runtime.platform.adapter.InfrastructureException
2009/04/23-12:33:10-CDT [1FA1BB6] oracle.wh.runtime.platform.adapter.InfrastructureException: RPE-01003: An infrastructure condition prevented the request from completing.
- null
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionContextImpl.createMessage(ExecutionContextImpl.java:3686)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionContextImpl.reportMessage(ExecutionContextImpl.java:1084)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionController.execute(ExecutionController.java:116)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionController.execute(ExecutionController.java:23)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.ExecutionManager.run(ExecutionManager.java:36)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.AdapterContextImpl.getPlatformConnection(AdapterContextImpl.java:83)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionContextImpl.createMessage(ExecutionContextImpl.java:3639)
     ... 5 more
2009/04/23-12:33:10-CDT [1FA1BB6] {Cause Exception with null message}
java.lang.NullPointerException
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.AdapterContextImpl.getPlatformConnection(AdapterContextImpl.java:83)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionContextImpl.createMessage(ExecutionContextImpl.java:3639)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionContextImpl.reportMessage(ExecutionContextImpl.java:1084)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionController.execute(ExecutionController.java:116)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.controller.ExecutionController.execute(ExecutionController.java:23)
     at oracle.wh.runtime.platform.service.ExecutionManager.run(ExecutionManager.java:36)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)

Steps to Reproduce Problem:
We recently upgrade our test system from 10.2 into 11.1 and OWB client from 10.2.0.3 into 10.2.0.4
During the upgrade DBA update OWB location setting into 11.1
After the upgrade, I re-deploy several Process Flows, but I did not re-deploy mappings that get call by the PF
When I run the PF, the mapping was stuck in 'BUSY' status (owb_owner.all_rt_audit_executions)
When i check the log it shows this following error:
oracle.wh.runtime.platform.adapter.InfrastructureException: RPE-01003: An infrastructure condition prevented the >request from completing.
- no rows found for select into statementFirst deploy alll dependent object of Process Flow.
like tables ,mappings then try to execute PF.

OWB Process Flow Execution in Workflow

Hi!
I hope somebody can help me with this one... I have a process flow designed to load data from a flat file to a db staging table then do some transformation on the data and load the data to the data warehouse. I am using OWB 9.2.0.2.8, 9i DB (9.2.0.5) and OWF 2.6.2. I have successfully validated and deployed the process flow but during execution, the process failed on the mapping that loads data from the flat file to the staging table. The message log of the deployment manager reports: /u01/oracle/product/owb/temp/STAGING_MAP.ctl (No such file or directory). Do I have to set the source location for the flat file again? You see we have already executed this mapping alone and it worked fine, using the source location in the server as defined in the mapping, which is /u01/files/.
Thank you.
Shiela

hi,
well,jus check whether u created locations and connecter and check u deployed every thing and try once again.
naren

Where is a process flow's Execution details - Log section stored ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for