Which PVR gives best quality?

Hi everybody,
I have already posted a similar quest but I can't find it anymore so I'm posting another:
I want to transfer VHS video to DVDs and I also want to record live TV via my Mac in the best possible quality.
I have done some reading on 3 models of PVR machines:
myTV.PVR, Plextor's ConvertX 402U-NA/Mac and Elgato's EyeTV 250. Obviously each brand will boost it's capabilities to sell their product.
I've got cable TV and I have tried the myTV.PVR and I'm not completely satisfied with the video quality after I've created Disc Image for previewing. I'm still getting somewhat snowy picture quality and pixel movement from Disc Imgages saved from live TV recording. Maybe I'm doing something wrong?
Before I return it, I'm looking for some feedback from other users, regarding any brand.
Does anyone have experience with these or any brands?
Thanks in advance for input or suggestions.
Rio.

Eye250 is aimed at cable but"EyeTV 250 is perfect for conventional analog cable TV or aerial/antenna reception. Simply connect the co-axial cable to EyeTV 250, plug EyeTV 250 into a USB 2.0 or 1.1 port on your Mac, and start watching TV. It couldn’t be easier."
So if you don't have cable or even satellite and rely on an outdoor or even indoor antenna then you can watch TV on your Mac and the quality is dependent on how good your antenna is.
As for converting VHS tapes to digital data on your Mac, "EyeTV 250 comes with a break-out cable for S-Video and composite RCA video connections. So, EyeTV 250 is the right choice if you receive higher frequency channels, scrambled analog cable (premium) channels, digital cable, or satellite via a set-top box." It's also find if you receive normal broadcast channels.
"break-out" is just a buzz word. The cable they provide with the product allows you to connect your VCR directly into the EyeTV. Instead of offering connections on the PVR itself (as they did with earlier versions) the use a cable that offers the connection plugs for RCA connections (yellow, red and white cables) and S-Video. If you have those connections you can capture from your VCR.
If you were to find a copy of their earlier EyeTV200, the connections were directly in the EyeTV box and there was not 'break-out' cable. You connected the S-Video plug to the back of the EyeTV200 or the three yellow, red and white cables. With EyeTV250 you connect into a new multi-functional cable.
Either way, your connection from VCR to Mac is there, on the EyeTV 250.
As for the fuzzy cable capture you saw. First, did he actually demonstrate the recording of the picture and then displaying of the same picture? If so, when you saw the original cable picture was it the same quality as the resulting capture display? It should have been unless he had the recorded video displaying at a larger frame size then it was captured. If you take a jpg 100X100 and zoom in on it to 500X500 then yes, it will be blurry.
When it comes to "after use" you should have no problems with EyeTV250. I think the biggest problem you may encounter with digital TV is encryption (or proprietary scrambling). NO PVR can decrypt (legally) any program that the digital supplier scrambles "their way". MacroVison is an infamous encryption process used on many commercial VHS and DVDs but that has been broken or decryped by such devices (and software) as Sima, Facetcom and (the mac software) Mac The Ripper. It has been broken because it is a standard type of encryption. Today many private broadcasters are sending out signals that encrypt in a form that they can control.
So if you plan on recording programs over cable that are generally broadcast over VHF/UVF public airwaves then you'll get high quality shows/movies. If you want copies of HBO, ShowTime, Bravo, etc., they may or may not be encrypted by the broadcaster themselves and that would leave your PVR recording scrambled. Although you don't say this specifically I think that is what you are or may be seeking to [eventually] do, i.e., such as record Pay Per View broadcasts.
No, the EyeTV does not get too hot at all. My EyeTV500 is always plugged in 24/7. Never give it a second thought regarding heat, in fact I have several VHS tapes sitting on top of it. You should not have to unplug it because of heat at all. If so, send it back.
Yes, I'm very satisfied with the EyeTV 500. I didn't really need the EyeTV 500 and should have opted (at the time) for the EyeTV 200. I think the biggest difference between the 200 and 250 is the 'break-out' cable. Elagto was able to make a cable that would allow the connection of RCA inputs into the cable rather then directly into the EyeTV hardware product. That feature/function allowed them to make the EyeTV250 hardware a bit smaller than the 200.
When I went looking for information I got most of it from a guy named John Hudson. He had done a lot of research on converting VHS videos over to digital formats and found the EyeTV 200 would provide all the basic needs but they had moved on to the EyeTV250 and the price was too high (then). He went to eBay and found a used EyeTV200 and sort of chastised me for going with the EyeTV 500 (too much product, too much money) but since my company was paying for it, I didn't mind.
If you can, go to eBay and buy a used EyeTV200 cheaply. You can always resell it on eBay if you find it doesn't give you want you want. You might even go there for a low cost EyeTV 250 because people move up or on and sell them often.
Just a tip: Television and media formats are evolving. At first I made everything into a DVD but then found that was wasteful and unnecessary for 99% of video viewing. Once captured you can export via EyeTV it to a variety of formats: mpeg, avi, DivX, mp4, and more. Play each of those on a Mac with an iMac or Cinema display and the quality is amazing, even at full screen - and I have a 30" Cinema display from Apple. And full screen is great for group viewing but if it's just you at the computer watching "Saturday Night Live" or "Babel" on say a 20" or 24" iMac or larger display, you can fill up half the screen with the video and use the other half to surf the 'Net and tend to internet business.
And in those formats you can sock away five or six full length HD movies on a blank DVDR rather then one movie on a DVD (as burned by the DVD function of Toast). And Hey! Blu-Ray has arrived. Instead of 7Gig of blank space on a DVD we have 50Gig to play with!
Tim...
3Ghz Mac Pro w/8GRam, 3TerabytesHD; 13" BlackBook; Black 80Gig Video iPod   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   30" Cinema, HPColorLJ Printer, LaCie 600Gig External & LaCie DVDRW/CDRW Drives

Similar Messages

  • Which method for best quality video?

    I am importing analog home movies into iMovie 08 via Canopus ADVC300 (works great). Which of the following methods in iMovie will produce the best quality video when I eventually burn DVDs in iDVD: (1) Share to Media Browser and check "Large", or (2) Export to DV Stream? Or is there some other option I have not mentioned? Thanks for your help!

    I agree with most of what has been said here.
    Use iMovie 06 instead. I was having the same problem when using iMovie 08. I believe it has to do with how iMovie 08 deinterlaces your video. Even at the highest settings, my videos would look bad once burned to a DVD. At first I thought maybe it was just how the video looked previewed in iMovie, but that wasn't the case. When using iMovie 06, the video looks just like the original DV while editing.
    However I have a different opinion regarding DVD media.
    I have found DVD+R to be more reliable than DVD-R. The only disadvantage to DVD+R is that DVD players manufacture before 2003 may not play them.
    DVD+R disks are better than DVD-R disks because of the increased error correction technique used for the +R type.
    DVD+R has a more robust error management system than DVD-R, allowing for more accurate burning to media independent of the quality of the media.
    I would recommend Taiyo Yuden DVD+Rs. (I get excellent results using iMovie 06 with iDVD 08.)
    If money is no object look at MAM-A DVD+R 4.7GB. Mitsui Gold Archive DVD
    Gold archive recordables are high performance discs featuring gold-on-gold construction, which provides longevity and maximum resistance to environmental degregation.

  • Best Quality graphic to import?

    I do all of my text and graphic work in Photoshop and I want to figure out the best way to import text and graphics with effects on them into FCP. I want the effects to show up. To retain the effects do I save them as png, tiff, photoshop? Which is the best quality?
    I tried to bring in a layered photoshop file with all of my text work and it didn't bring in the effects(drop shadows, glows, etc.). A png brought in the effects, but I just want to make sure I am using the best way for great looking graphics without noise around the text.
    Any suggestions would be great!
    John

    You can use a layered .psd file, but the layers involving text effects (drop shadows, glows, etc) must be rasterized.
    What I like to do is create a new, empty layer below each text layer that I want to retain as a track in FCP, then do an Option-Command-E to with the two layers selected. This preserves the original text layer while Merging Down to the bottom, empty layer (giving you the rasterized text that FCP needs). After saving the file (to preserve my 'master'), I strip out the text effects (non-rasterized) layers in Photoshop, do a save as (for the stripped-down) prior to importing in FCP.
    Though this is but one technique, and I'm no Photoshop master...

  • I would like to be able to size images by kilobytes instead of pixels--is this possible?  I use I-Contact which requires a maximum of 70kb per image.  For best quality I want to make the images as close to 70 as possible.  Currently I choose a size of 300

    I would like to be able to size images by kilobytes instead of pixels--is this possible?  I use I-Contact which requires a maximum of 70kb per image.  For best quality I want to make the images as close to 70 as possible.  Currently I choose a size of 300 pixels on the shortest side but sometimes this gives me an image of slightly greater than 70kb and sometimes the image is just 30-40kb.  Is there a way to be more precise in reaching but not exceeding 70 kb?

    That is not a feature of iPhoto - suggest to Apple - iPhoto Menu ==> provide iPhoto feedback.
    You can opnly resize using the available options and file size is not one of them
    LN

  • We are looking for a software which converts SWF to MP4, we found many software which does the job but issue is file size is not optimize.  We found Adobe captivate 6 which gives optimum quality with good output but thing is we do not have batch process i

    Hi
    We are looking for a software which converts SWF to MP4, we found many software which does the job but issue is file size is not optimize.
      We found Adobe captivate 6 which gives optimum quality with good output but thing is we do not have batch process in captivate 6. so we request you to create a plugin or give a best option which have batch render quality and optimize in file size,

    Captivate is e-learning development software not a dedicated video convertor, you are better off trying something like Adobe Media Encoder or Super.

  • I recently purchased a MacBook Pro with Retina.  Which adapter do I purchase to connect it to a Samsung TV for the best quality?

    I recently purchased a MacBook Pro with Retina.  Which adapter do I purchase to connect it to a Samsung TV for the best quality? Thanks.

    Doesn't matter. All HDMI cables should work, some are considered better than others, I had a $5 ebay cable work just as good as a $20 monster HDMI cable.

  • How to give client best quality of raw footage

    So normally I shoot, edit, and burn sporting events for a certain client. However, this thime the just want to pay for the raw footage. Since I've noveer done this before, I'm a little confused. Usually I would export using Quicktime and then drop th quicktime into iDVD or Roxio and then burn a copy. But since they might want someone else to edit the footage, how do I give them the best quality format. I am sticking with burning something to DVD. But last night I was looking at export using quicktime conversion. There were all kinds of options. What would you recommend for exporting? I would assume if I burn it onto a DVD using iDVD, they would have to rip it to edit it. But doesn't puting something on DVD compress the footage? It is shot in SD, but I want to ensure maximium quality. Any suggestions?

    It's a Sony miniDV camera. The footage specs are as follows:
    Sony:
    Frame Size: 720x480
    Vid Rate: 29.97 fps
    Compressor: DV/DVCPRO-NT
    Data Rate : 3.6MB/sec
    Aud Rate 48.0 KHz
    Aud Format: 16 Bit
    Pixel Aspect: NTSC-CCIR601
    Field Dominance: Lower(even)
    Or at least that's the information I got from FCE. The footage is 3 seperate camera angels with about 75 minutes for each camera. I'm assuming they mean to have someone else edit it, but what program they would be using, I really don't know. When you state "1) an actual copy of the raw footage", do you mean a tape copy? I do not want to give them the original tapes it was recorded onto.
    "QuickTime/DV or QuickTime/AIC" I do not know the difference. I refer to myself as the Cole Trickle (Days of Thunder reference) of video editing. I don't know how or why the car works, I just know how to drive it. With video editing, I do not know all the internal knowledge of aspect ratios or what a codec is, but I know how to tell a story and get that feeling onto a TV screen. Yes, I am limited by my own ignorance, but I am a visual learner. I can read it 100 times, but if someone shows me once I have it down.
    Aside from the rant, I want to deliver the footage on DVD. Our original agreement was for myself to edit the footage, but I respect the free market. I want to be as profesional as possible when it comes to business. I fell into this client backasswards, and wasn't meaning to create a full time career, but they liked my work and I liked doing it.

  • When importing a CD to iTunes which will then be downloaded onto a ipod, which is the best setting format for sound quality?Im unsure if once i save setting for CD import, do i then have to change settings to sync with my ipod?

    When importing a CD to iTunes  which will then be downloaded onto a ipod, which is the best setting for audio quality?  Also once CD is downloaded do i need to change the setting to sync with my ipod?

    gobbybird40 wrote:
    Also once CD is downloaded do i need to change the setting to sync with my ipod?
    I'm not sure what settings you are referring to. If you mean the import CD settings, there would be no point in changing them after importing the CD, would there?
    As for the best setting for audio quality, it's down to your preference. Many people will not hear the difference bewteen one setting and another. The best thing to do is import the same song several times using different import setttings (and change the song title so you know which one is which) and then listen to them on your iPod. Then decide.
    Unless you have specific reasons for using the WAV setting, don't use it. It will use up a lot of space on your iPod and you cannot tag WAV files in the same way as the other formats.

  • FCProp 6: Which setting for the best quality encoding (capture)?

    Hi everybody,
    i am producing contents from HDV cam (Sony Z1) and i just saw one of my colleagues (journalist too) working on Adobe Premiere having a really better final report than my one (using the same tape).
    i just wonder if someone could explain what would be the best workflow to get the best quality on a standard DVD (not the next generation)?
    our reports are based on Fashion, so we are using some filters for some of the images. i heared about the RS422 or something like that wich is the new aple encoder ? am i right ? is this what should be used for the capture and rendering files ?
    what about the export encoding setting? movies are all under 10min duration
    Thank you very much for your hightlights
    Sam

    I use FCPX/iDVD regularly to make DVDs.  Workflow is to edit 1080i project in FCPX, add chapter markers, and export video using Share -> Master File (default) with no changes.
    The resulting .mov file is then imported to iDVD with various themes, etc. and "Save as Disk Image" is used to create a burnable file for creating DVDs with Disk Utility.
    Be aware that the titling of chapter markers is flaky and you may have to retitle them in iDVD as the name from FCPX is not always saved.  No big deal.
    I also use MPEG Streamc;ip to create a 128//720 mp4 file which goes readily into iTunes and then i synced to my iPad for portable show and tell.  Have to confess that I have Compressor too, but have never used it and from following the forums get the impression that it's not easy to use.  MS works fine for my limited purposes

  • Which kind of paper is suitable for printing best quality photo by hp officejet 4500 wireless?

    Hi
    I have a "hp officejet 4500 wireless" printer and want to print best quality photo from my digital camera. Which kind of paper is suitable for my job? Please kindly advice me.
    Best regards,
    Faezeh Dibaei

    The link below will bring you to the HPshopping website for the Officejet 4500 supplies. Click on the "Paper" link at the top of the webpage and it should show you the supported paper types. I would personally asuggest the Advanced photo paper for photo pritning.
    http://shopping2.hp.com/en_US/home-office/-/produc​ts/-/-/CB867A?TargetPage=productsupplies
    Binary_Zen (worked at HP )
    Click the white Kudos star to say thanks
    Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem

  • Best Quality or Best Performance. Which?

    I am using iMovie to import a series of old videotapes and my question relates to producing the best possible output of these captured tapes from iDVD. So far it seems to me that the original tapes look better than their digital offspring written to DVD. Under Project info there are two encoding options, Best Performance and Best Quality. The help pages state or imply that Best Quality means just that. However that setting also produces smaller files, say 2.6Gb for an 83 minute recording as opposed to 4.6Gb when set to Best Performance. This doesn't seem to make sense as smaller files are presumably more compressed and therefore of lower quality. Can someone explain? What settings should I use?
    Thanks.
    Mac Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

    So if Best Quality uses a lower bitrate perhaps it should be called Less Quality
    Bitrate isn't everything. A good encoder may well produce better quality with a lower bitrate than another encoder with a higher bitrate. And often good quality takes more time to encode, too.
    I have done some tests and at least with that particular test material I got slightly better quality in a very few high-action scenes with Best Performance.
    But since most of my DVDs are >60 minutes, I always use the Best Quality setting.
    should a DVD from videotape have the same quality (good, bad or indifferent) as the original?
    MPEG encoding compresses data so the quality will always suffer. But usually you don't notice it. It also depends on the input material: difficult to encode scenes include high action, noisy low-light scenes, water, smoke etc.
    With Best Performance or with <75(-90) minutes' Best Quality the iDVD output quality has been OK for me.
    But I'd wish iDVD used compressed audio because uncompressed PCM audio steals way too much bandwidth from video in long (90-120 min) DVDs!

  • Which QT codec for best quality

    I have just finished a FCP 5 project that is less than 1 hour and would like to convert it to a QT mov to show from my laptop through a projector on a big screen. Do I use the H264 at the highest quality settings or do I use the DV/DVCPRO-NTSC best quality settings. Or, is there another QT codec that I can use to achieve the highest quality. This a SD video project not an HD. Thanks for any suggestions.
    Dual 2GHz PowerPC G5   Mac OS X (10.4.9)   QT Pro 7.1.6

    The resolution is hardly the main variable for file size vs. the bitrate. I find that 320X clips will upscale quite well from good quality source material at a high enough bitrate. You ignore the data rate and do 640X at 200 kbps it will look crummy regardless of the great size you chose.
    Actually the advice I gave him to try a test clip at a few variations is the best to follow. Avoids under or over compressing the original.
    Apple agrees with me as well:
    Data Rate (bit rate): In general, the higher the data rate, the better the quality, but the bigger the file. In most cases, you’ll want to set a data rate based on the way your movie will be viewed. For example, for streaming to 384K broadband connections, you need to limit the data rate to around 350-360 kilobits per second to leave room for network traffic. If the file will be downloaded for playback, the data rate can be much higher (the higher the data rate, however, the longer a slow-connection user has longer to wait before playback begins). In addition, remember in this dialog you’re setting the video data rate. You also need to leave some room for audio.
    For H.264, here are some general guidelines:
    * For a frame size of 1920 x 1080 (full high definition), choose a data rate of 7,000-8,000 Kbps.
    * For a frame size of 1280 x 720 (commonly-used high definition), choose a data rate of 5,000-6,000 Kbps.
    * For a frame size of 640 x 480 (standard definition), choose a data rate of 1,000-2,000 Kbps.
    * For a frame size of 320 x 240 (Internet-size content), choose a data rate of 300-500 Kbps.
    * For a frame size of 176 x 144 (3G), choose a data rate of 50-60 Kbps for 10-15 fps content, or up to 150-200 Kbps for 24-30 fps content.
    As mentioned in the 3G example, it’s important to keep in mind that the data rate of a movie is also affected by other compression options you set, such as the frame rate. So the higher your frame rate, the higher your data rate needs to be.

  • Best quality animated gif export

    Hi
    I was doing just fine exporting animated gifs (in terms of quality output) and all of a sudden on an update to my fireworks png my exports (no matter what options I change) are just not as good quality as before.
    Essentially, I am trying to get as close to the JPEG 100% quality (best quality) I can get - drop shadows on items just don't like that great at moment.
    Could someone please advise what is absolute optimum setting for best quality output for an animated gif - I am not concerned about file size.
    many thanks
    Jeff

    Without seeing the image/animation, I can't make specific comments.
    However. Keep in mind that the GIF format has an indexed palette of 256 colors, total, one of which can be transparent. If you have a still image of 256 shades of red, and a still image of 256 shades of blue, they'll look fine as GIFs. If you try to combine them as an animated GIF, then the palette will need to be 128 shades each of red and blue, so neither of the images as frames in the animation will look as good as they do as stills.
    Also, Fireworks doesn't always give you the maximum amount of colors. If you have an image with 1000 colors, and you export to GIF, you probably won't get 256 colors in your palette. Go to File>Image Preview and see what your palette is. If necessary, add colors from your image where you notice banding (with dithering off).
    Finally, the two image formats are not equally appropriate for all image content. GIF is good for line art of solid colors. It isn't good for photos or gradients. If you can forgo your drop shadows you'll probably get better quality in the essential parts of the images. JPEGs are good for photos and gradients (although I prefer PNGs for gradients, myself), and are not good for line art. Unfortunately, if you want an animation, you need a GIF or Flash.

  • Need serious help about understanding settings on photoshop for the best quality- please reply is you know a lot about this.

    Ideally I'd like to speak to someone from the UK as I feel I can't write out everything I want to say because it's too confusing and it isn't just one question.
    I need help with setting photoshop so the images are the best quality on screen and for websites and printing and how I can change that etc I've heard different things and I just need some clarification and advice.
    Obviously I'm sure some of you wont want to give personal details out that's fine but I'm generally just in need of some advice, let me know if you can help:)

    I don't change any settings.  For 1X web images I always use Save for Web.  PS remembers which web settings you used the last time.   This doesn't effect other files or formats.
    Image optimization — Web Fundamentals
    Improving Images for Hi-Res Retina Displays
    A guide for creating a better retina web - Ivo Mynttinen / User Interface Designer
    Serving Hi-Res images only to High Density Displays with PHP
    Retina Images
    Seriously, you can drive yourself crazy with all this Retina display stuff.  I don't see much upside to it except for very special situations.
    Nancy O.

  • Help understanding workflow for best quality.

    Greetings.
    I've read countless hours on this forum in the effort to understand this extremely complicated subject of getting my video out of my camera and onto a DVD in the best quality possible, and I'm still a little confused.
    I'm not recording anything that is particularly high-action, but rather weddings, funerals, (yeah, I know), children's school programs, and my next big project is a seminar with keynote speaker.
    I have three Sony HDR SR-11 cameras, which clearly record video as ACHDV and the video signal is 1080/60i (NTSC). I could also record in SD with an MPEG2 file.
    I understand the a DVD is only SD at best, and am recording in HD since I have room for the files, and someday we might have better options for the video than we have now.
    I started using iMovie, and have iMovie 11, and just love how easy and slick it is to make impressive looking stuff.
    Once I import into iDVD to make the cool menus, I use "professional" encoding. I am about to produce a longer video than will fit on a single layer disk, and will be burning to a dual-layer DVD.
    I own a copy of FCE, but was overwhelmed when I first started to use it, and on a time crunch for that project, reverted back to iMovie.
    How I record events is to set up three cameras from different perspectives and then create a movie from the best angles, switching back and forth. This is a little cumbersome in iMovie, but I've had no trouble except for the date stamp disappearing and having to fix that on my most recent project. (once the date stamp is gone...it's hard to figure out where the clips are that you need for the next minute or two at a time).
    I'm about to embark on an effort to market my work professionally, and am clearly working with amateur equipment, and without the time or resources to start all over with a $50K investment, would like to squeak by on what I have, and need to get the best quality possible out of it. Without any question, my market requires the movies to be on DVDs.
    I'm most confused by interlacing/deinterlacing issue. I understand what the two are, but not what to do about it, if anything. I notice there is a button to check "deinterlace" in iMovie, and wonder why it's there and if it works and if I should be using it.
    What would my specific advantages be, if any, to learning FCE? If a huge difference could be made, I would take the time to learn FCE, and I could lay out another couple hundred bucks for other software, if you had some to recommend that would greatly surpass what I'm doing, in place of iDVD or another intermediary I should be using.
    I've been exporting with QT, using the following settings:
    Video:
    Compression: H.264
    Quality: High
    Key frame:24
    Frame reordering: yes
    Encoding: multi-pass
    Dimensions: 960x540
    Sound:
    Format: Integer (Little Endian)
    Sample: 44.1 kHz
    Sample: 16-bit
    Channels: Stereo
    Then create menus in iDVD and burn to DVD.
    Could you please give me feedback on my process, and try to answer my questions and clear up my confusion? I'd appreciate it so much!
    Karen

    Does FCE do this with multiple cameras? I'd want to make sure that FCS does it, before I buy it and am stuck with it, especially if FCE will do it and I already have it.
    Yes and No
    No - Multicamera is a function in FC Pro
    Yes - but You do it in a very "Paper-clip" way. Put each Camera on one track ontop of each other
    Camera 1 - v-tr 1
    Camera 2 - v-tr 2
    Camera 3 - v-tr 3
    Then schrink the view of each track to 25% with Vireframe and put them into one corner
    each (Not the same one)
    Move them so that the sync. frame eg a photo flash is on the same time for all three video-tracks.
    Now when playing one see the three views in paralell.
    THIS demands that all Cameras has a common Sync-point (I use a photo-flash)
    AND that no Camera was turned off during uptake.
    IT is also important to know if any of the Cameras are sencitive to movements.
    My small one is.
    So I put mine on tripods !
    This recording behaviour is the same if using FinalCut Pro ! Cont. recording and one sync. frame.
    Then when playing in FinalCut Express - one use the transparicy tool to make the
    Camera visibly that has the best picture.
    When done the full movie (by adjusting transparicy - one re-size the Video tracks to 100% and let them fill view.
    Now when playback - You see the edited result.
    In FC Pro - You set Your Cameras as Multi Camera and set the sync frame. Now it will
    in Viewer play (in 25% size) and You just point at the best view trough the movie
    and it will assemble in TimeLine. You need not to be especially on target - easily adjusted
    with roll-tool (I think) in after hand.
    1 hour editing two Cameras takes for me (ME)
    • FinalCut Express - about 10 hours
    • FinalCut Pro - 2 hours to Capture - 1h15min to edit.
    There is a program - CaptureMagic SD (HD) - that let's You copy directly to Your Mac
    hard disk - NEED is one FW-port per Camera
    (Port is something else than the connectors, My PowerBook G4 has one FW400 and one FW800 connector
    BUT ONLY one FW-port - So I need to use a CMA-CIA-card with one FW-connector to get a second FW-port )
    This set-up works and I get the material Captured in real-time. Resulting in editing time 1h 15min per hour movie.
    Yours Bengt W

Maybe you are looking for

  • WebI report based on BEx query in Live Office document

    Hi We have a BEx query in BW that has one input ready variable (period). Then we have created a WebI report based on this BEx query (the WebI report itself does not have any prompts). When we run the WebI report we get asked to enter a value in the B

  • What does it take to turn on personal hotspot?

    Can I get personal hotspot turned on?

  • Converter pictures and videos files to jpg and mpeg

    Do you know a safety software o freeware to convert pictures and videos files to jpg and mpeg? to use in my desktop with windows?

  • Configuration id with PR  create LSMW

    Hello Experts, I am doing LSMW for Purchase requisition( Header and Item)  by using the standard Program: Object                0080   Method               0000 Program Name   RM06BBI0 Program Type     B   Batch Input But I noticed that no internal o

  • Deployment via JDev works, OEM - File Upload not!?

    Hello! A weird thing for you. I try to deploy a, 10.1.2 to 10.1.3 migrated, Struts-App. Deploying via JDev to Standalone OC4J 10.1.3 works fine! Deploying via OEM - File Upload to same OC4J ends in error: In XYZ.war missing Standard-Deployment in WEB