Why no SCALE option for lightbox images?

Need SCALE options for lightbox images!
Must have SCALE DOWN option.
Images must scale down to display correctly on a smaller screen.
Currently Muse Lightbox FAILS on smaller browser screens.
Adobe please include this feature ASAP!

Thanks for the reply
The problem with the Fullscreen Lightbox is that the images scale up and pixelate on a larger browser viewport.
(To avoid this requires a very large image that makes loading slow)
So for Fullscreen Lightbox I would like a SCALE DOWN ONLY option (requested previously). Then the images would not scale up above 100% and would float centred on larger browser viewports (FIT PROPORTIONALLY option used).
And for the standard lightbox a scale option, as requested above, would mean the image doesn't overflow on a smaller browser viewport.
The reason for asking for scale options is to keep images looking their best at 100%, and downscaling for smaller browser ports.

Similar Messages

Why are the options for "When Firefox starts" NOT clickable in Firefox 5? I want to choose "Windows and tabs that where opened last time you accessed the net" but Firefox won't let me.

In the previous version of Firefox one could choose to save tabs so that when Firefox opened, all the tabs from the previous sessions appeared. This was done in Settings > Options > General > Startup. In the menu for the "When Firefox Starts" one had the option for "Windows and tabs that where opened last time you accessed the net." in Firefox 5.0, this menu is gray and not clickable. Help, please?

''Why are the options for "When Firefox starts" NOT clickable in Firefox 5?"
Possibly you are not saving your "browsing history" which is what the session history is tied into.
'''Not saving History''' -- check your settings for '''Tools > options > Privacy'''', make sure you are not clearing more than just cache in "Settings for Clearing History"
* http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/4928/clearcachew.png
* clearing your history at end of session, cache is the only one you would want to clear at end of session, if you don't want to lose things
There are several things that are related to private browsing and not saving History
* Private Browsing Ctrl+Shift+P
* You selected "Never remember history" in first drop-down of Tools > Options Privacy and all of the check marks disappear (See picture above)
* "Permanent private browsing mode" was check-marked under "Use custom settings for history" in the first drop-down of Tools > options > Privacy (see picture above)

Why a Windows option for Banner Printing & Not MAC?

I was told by Epson that MAC doesn't offer a Banner option for my Epson Printer, but that there is an option for the Windows platform. This seems strange to me, especially when MAC is supposed to be the better graphics machine.
Does anyone know why this is the case? Is it just a question of limited printer driver options that Apple offers?
[No one was able to answer my specific question so I've made this one more general.]
Power Mac G4 & PowerBook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.8) Epson Stylus Photo R1800

I was told by Epson that MAC doesn't offer a
Banner
option for my Epson Printer, but that there is an
option for the Windows platform. This seems
strange
to me, especially when MAC is supposed to be the
better graphics machine.
It is not that Macs don't offer a banner option for
you Epson printer. Rather, it is the Epson printer
driver that doesn't offer this feature on the Mac
platform. There is a significant difference between
the two statements.
Does anyone know why this is the case? Is it just
a
question of limited printer driver options that
Apple
offers?
Apple does not write the printer drivers. Apple
includes many manufacturer's drivers with the
installation of Mac OS X, but Apple did not write
them. I do not know why Epson doesn't provide the
banner option you mentioned in your first post. Any
further statement would probably amount to
speculation and is not appropriate or permitted in
these forums. What I can state as fact is that many,
many software programs have more features in their
Windows versions than in their Mac releases.
[No one was able to answer my specific question so
I've made this one more general.]
As to your original question, I did a quick look on
VersionTracker and and found a freeware program Tiler that may be of help to you.
Matt
Mac Mini G4; B&W
G3/300
Matt,
Yes I do know that Apple doesn't write the drivers, however, they still provide the protocols & interface for both platforms. So it's hard to figure why Windows has a driver with a banner option while a MAC doesn't.
Nevertheless Matt, I do appreciate the heads-up about Tiler. If it works out, it will be a God-send for what I do.
Thanks for taking the time to respond!
Power Mac G4 & PowerBook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.8) Epson Stylus Photo R1800

Why thet gave option for idoc in bw

hi friends,
why they gave option idoc (data transfer method ) in bw. what is the use. we have psa, again why we need idoc.
Thanking u
suneel.

IDOC (Intermediate Document)
IDOC is SAPs standard format for electronic data interchange between systems. IDOCs can be used in the following business scenarios:
- Application link enabling (ALE). Communication between logical systems; logical systems can be SAP R/3, R/2, or non-SAP systems.
- Electronic data interchange (EDI). Communication between an SAP R/3 or R/2 system and a non-SAP system
In SAP BW, an IDOC is a data container for data exchange between SAP systems or between SAP systems and external systems based on the EDI interface.
SAP RESTRICTIONS
IDOCs support limited file size (1,000 bytes).
Data cannot be loaded to PSA using IDOCs (ALE).
OPTIMIZATION
Queries and Data Staging
You should leverage PSA (and ODS) to store detailed data rather than in the InfoCube as it may contribute considerably to the increase in the query (keep detailed data out of the InfoCube) and system performance (due to higher throughput during data load since PSA uses TRFC rather than IDOC).
Regards
Naga

Why no RAID options for new disks?

Hi support group,
"My name is Shaun, and I am a mac-aholic"
I inserted 4 new 3TB disks into the bays of my Mac Pro (2012), and there is no RAID option for them.
How I got here:
Inserted the WD Red drives, and they were not initiated.
I "erased" the drives, gave them names, and they appear in Disk Utility in grey drives.
Went to set up the RAID, and move the drives into the RAID, but got an error that they could not be used.
It appears to me that disk utility is not allowing me to fully use those drives. I Have created RAID drives before with no issue in RAID1 with 3TB drives before on this machine. Am perplexed, I thought this to be the easy and simple part of my upgrade odyssey! Did I screw up the initialization? On all FOUR drives?
Now, if I click on the drives, the RAID option does not present itself.
FWIW, I am using OS X 10.9.5, on Mac Pro 5,1. I boot from PCIe card. My end goal is to create a 4-disk RAID 10 using the four SATA connections on the MP.

It was really pretty simple based on your feedback, I powered down, removed the drives from the SATA backplane, moved each drive separately to the USB enclosure, then re-"erased" in OSX-Etended. I ejected each drive when finished, and moved to the next one until all four were re-"erased". Then I restarted the Mac with all four in the SATA connections, and all four were visible and had the RAID option tab. I created the three RAID schemes (two stripe and one mirror), and dragged the drives into the RAID option. Then I hit "create" or some other command to finish the RAID.
Note that I did get an error on the RAID creation. From memory, this was "cannot create RAID without an unmounted disk" or something like that. I cleared the error, and then opened back up Disk Utility. All the RAIDs were listed, and were operational with the green "On" signal. I could read/write/transfer from the RAID. Once I transfer the data to this RAID, I will work on a way to test it, but if any risk to the data, I might just leave well enough alone.
For now, it seems I have a fully functional RAID 1+0 using the four HDD on the SATA connections in my Mac Pro 5,1.

Why no BTO option for 7200 RPM Drive in 13" MBP???

There is no BTO option for a 7200 RPM drive in the 13", but there is for the 15" and 17". Does this mean they won't fit/work in the 13", or is Apple just not offering it?
Thanks..
Message was edited by: solsun

It means Apple is not offering it. There are 7200 rpm drives with the proper form factor (9.5 mm height). The heat difference is not significant. As I recall, when the MBP line first came out, 7200 rpm drives were available on the 17" MBPs, but not on the 15" models. You can't get a new 13" MBP with anything faster than a 2.53 GHz CPU, either - it's just a differentiation point. You can get the stock capacity drive on the 13" MBP, and put in a 500 GB 7200 rpm drive yourself.

Why does ppi matter for web images?

Hello
When placing an image in my (web/pixel) project the resolution is dependent from the set ppi.
When I create a new document for web, then logically only the pixels matter. Nonetheless there's a ppi field, why? And depending what value it has, placed pictures (file > place or drag&drop from Windows' explorer) get resized instead of the wanted 1:1 resolution.
1 pixel should remain 1 pixel when working with in pixels.
Try it out:
Create a new document with Full HD resolution (1920x1080 pixels), set ppi to 10.
Import a Full HD picture (Blu-Ray screenshot whatever) and it's mini-sized.
My screen resolution is 59 ppi (I use my 39" TV as monitor) and this is set in the Photoshop preferences (in case I do some print stuff that I get a 1:1 view if wanted). If there was any logic behind the pixel-ppi-placing thing, then this set standard monitor ppi should bring me a 100% sized picture... but it doesn't. Only when the ppi is set to the fantasy value of 72 I get a 100% sized placing.
This can be disturbing and is very annoying when starting a new project by opening an image that does not come with 72 ppi by default (my Canon camera makes 180 ppi JPEG photos) and placing new pictures in this project. They get opened in wrong sizes, in my case largely upscaled, with no way to correct it but guess-scaling it down.
Bug?
Pls pls fix it.
Ppi has nothing lost in pixels-only projects.
The only way that works is to open all single images in Photoshop as tabs, and then drag&drop from within Ps. -.-
Regards
Mopsi
Example screenshot: http://www.m-i-u.de/images-i83580bxvogj.jpg
The yellow framed layer is a image from my camera, opened in Photoshop CS6 extended. 3264x2448 pixels (180 ppi).
The green framed layer is a screenshot from a movie, drag&drop from the explorer. 1920x1080 (normally) unwanted upscaled here.
The red framed layer is a screensot as well, but drag&dropped from a tab within Photoshop. It remains in its original resolution of 1920x1080.

I'm wrong and your right. I just did some testing and Photoshop does indeed interpolate the lower resolution 600x400 72DPI image is up size to match the higher resolution document document size during the place process. I just assumed Photoshop would preserve image quality and not interpolate the image.    As you have shown it does interpolate the image which greatly lowers the image quality of re-sized low resolution image.
This shows you should not use Photoshop to merge images into a composite if they have greatly different resolutions. I don't have a problem there for I never use "save for web" to save images to be displayed on displays from the web or my machine. I use Fit Image and save as, or a Image Processor script that uses Fit Image to re-size and uses save as. The leave all my images files resolution setting unchanged.   For some reason Save for Web changes all jpeg files it saves resolution setting to 72 DPI even if they are 8MP images for high resolution displays..
During testing I also tried using Photoshop's script Load Files into Stack instead of using Place. That script works the way I assumed Photoshop Place would work. Images layer are not interpolated they remain the correct number of pixels and the image quality is not is not changed.. The image layer are normal layers but can be converted to smart object layers however the object would be normal layer not an image file.
When you use Place you get
It also possible to undo Photoshop's Place scaling with a simple calculation. Divide the image layer's original dpi by the document's dpi here there are three layer that did not start at 300dpi. two started out as 74dpi image file the other a 500dpi image file. 72/300=.24 = 24% the other 500/300=1.66666 = 166.66%
all you need do is change the associated layer's image transform width and height scale from 100% to the calculated percents
The only time I set document to 72DPI resolution is in Photoshop Scripts so I can calculate a font size for a charter sting so it will fit the canvas size. Photoshop Text Tools seem to be tied to 72DPI resolution. Once I add the text layer I restore the document DPI resolution back to its original setting.
So when it comes to Photoshop all files use in a project should have identical DPI resolution for best result when making composites.    My image files are either RAW files which have no DPI for they are not RGB image files. Or RGB Image files that have a high DPI resolution. I process images for print. Image files DPI resolution is meaningless when if comes to Display Screens. All that matters is the number of pixels a display can display and the number of pixels in the image. Even images I re-size for display screens DPI are high for I do not use "Save for Web". I see no good reason to strip metadata and change resolution to 72DPI. I tend not to interpolate image except the ones I save to be displayed on a display. I change Print size by changing the DPI setting without resample. My Epson 4800 inkjet printer has no problem printing high resolution pixel I see no reason resample my camera 16MP image down in size just to print at 300dpi. If I want to a single 6"x4" print I see nothing wrong printing it at 816DPI. My eyes can not resolve down there the printer can. However when Printing on Roll Paper many 6"x4" the composite document I create via a script has a 300DPI resolution and the image layers are resized to be 6" x 4".

Why there isnt option to save images as .RAW?

for example n86 8mp saves the images as 1mb jpgs right? it takes picture > compresses it > saves it
it wouldnt be much of a hassle to add option to not to compress photos if wanted i wonder why you cant do this yet or correct me if im wrong
the images would take approx 50 megabytes this way, but you could later save them as png's for example or just less compressed jpgs for better quality
Message Edited by witeshade on 30-Jul-2009 07:06 PM
Whales need plankton to survive, i need kudos! om nom nom

Exactly. It's a phone with a camera strapped on that you have there, not a digital camera that can make and receive calls. You can't expect the same image quality from a cameraphone, even one that is sold as an imaging device, as you can from a dedicated digital camera.
Was this post helpful? If so, please click on the white "Kudos!" star below. Thank you!

We need a "random" option for sorting images

I often need to randomly sort huge collections of images for web sites. This is a pain to use the "user sort" mode. Dragging and dropping is to slow.

I tried to make my onw order of pictures into a slide show,
but I do not find how to move them.
can you help me ?
thx
An

Why do the options for a new Home page always appear first when I sign in when I already have a Home page?

The screen page for creating a new Firefox Home page always shows up first when I sign on.....but, I already have a Home page and have to click again to get there.
How can I get Firefox to go directly to my actual Home page?

Hello Kathie,
Sorry for the inconvenience that has caused to you.
Please let me know if you have tried converting any other PDF to word with Reader.
Alos, please sign up at "https://cloud.acrobat.com/" using your Adobe ID credentials. Click on 'ExportPDF' tab and upload the PDF that you want to convert to Word.
Let me know if this converts fine.
Hope to hear from you.
regards,
Anubha

Why not an option for this?

I’ve gone back to Safari after years with Chrome because of the many problems I was having with the Flash extension. I like Safari again. It is more stable since I used it last. I'm still on Snow Leopard. I miss more than a few things about Chrome but there is ONE THING, however, that I really can't stand about Safari. Safari NEEDS an option to right click on selected text, select "Search with [your favorite NSA approved brower]," but open the search in a NEW TAB !!! It only searches in the same tab right now, which is very inconvenient. Either a check box in prefs or key combination-click or something. But please, make it SOMETHING. I'm so tired of having to copy the text, open a new tab, paste the text in search, and hit return. I know, life is rough sometimes but it doesn't have to be any rougher, does it?

>> ...right click on selected text, select "Search with..." but open the search in a NEW TAB !!! It only searches in the same tab right now ... Either a check box in prefs or key combination-click or something...
pressing the Command (Apple) key when clicking 'Search with...' opens the search in a new tab
Command-Shift-click makes that new tab active.
Command - Option - (Shift) does the same, but in a new window

Gray scale printing option for Canon C5030 model

Hello
Im having a problem on finding the gray scale option for canon c5030 model. I already checked for the color matching setting but no gray scale setting provided. Can someone please help me on this.
Thanks in advance!

I have the same printer and network printing is a pain. Canon decided not to include a network specific driver for this printer.
You can try getting the latest version of the gimp-print drivers. The latest version has better support for ip4300. If it's worth it to you, PrintFab drivers have been working for me but PrintFab isn't free.
The latest Gimp-print (Gutenprint) drivers are here: http://gimp-print.sourceforge.net/MacOSX.php3
Hope that helps.

Mail for exchange image retrieving

Hallo ,
Can somebody help me with exchange sync. The problem is that i recieve many times forworded mails. They have many signatures from anyone who has written there. So when i open a mail it continues telling me 'retrieving .png 'for example , and refresh the mail form the begining. If i read it , it turnd me back form the begining. so first 15 sec i cannot read the mail when open it because it dont stop to refresh itself for every image. In fact i stop the option for recieving image in the mail. from sett/phone / mail/message display/ image download - it is off. I think this is useful only for .jpg. So is there an option to make mail application not to refresh the mail for every singular part of one mail. Or is there a different sollution. Devide is n8
10x in advance

Yes I did check that. user name / password and server URL correct. Any other suggestions
Abi99 wrote:
MangeshA wrote:
16/07/2013 22:17:57 Falling back to Basic Authentication because of error 403
I am not a champion in reading these logs, however, I guess you face HTTP error 403, which means Forbidden, which means, you either have the wrong username/password or specified a wrong server URL. Did you double-check that, already?

Geotag option for Photo Downloader

An option for Geotagging images during download with the ability to select one or more matching GPS files (GPX, NMEA etc) would be highly desireable.
Similar to the current option for applying metadata
Getting this right from the outset would save a lot of duplication and messing around.
An option to run this retrospectively from Bridge would also be good.

I've been asking for this feature for a long, long time. I think I first asked for it when Lightroom 1 hadn't even made it to beta yet. It would be extremely simple to impliment but the folks at Adobe just don't listen to us.

I used to be able to right click on an image, a pop menu would show an option for properties. Where is the properties click option?

I used to be able to right click on an image, a pop menu would show an option for properties. Where is the properties click option?
Why did they change the pop-up menu? How can I revert Firefox to previous version?
== version update

To get that right-click menu item back use the extension at https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/14228/

Why no SCALE option for lightbox images?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for