Why thet gave option for idoc in bw

hi friends,
why they gave option idoc (data transfer method ) in bw. what is the use. we have psa, again why we need idoc.
Thanking u
suneel.

IDOC (Intermediate Document)
IDOC is SAPs standard format for electronic data interchange between systems. IDOCs can be used in the following business scenarios:
- Application link enabling (ALE). Communication between logical systems; logical systems can be SAP R/3, R/2, or non-SAP systems.
- Electronic data interchange (EDI). Communication between an SAP R/3 or R/2 system and a non-SAP system
In SAP BW, an IDOC is a data container for data exchange between SAP systems or between SAP systems and external systems based on the EDI interface.
SAP RESTRICTIONS
IDOCs support limited file size (1,000 bytes).
Data cannot be loaded to PSA using IDOCs (ALE).
OPTIMIZATION
Queries and Data Staging
You should leverage PSA (and ODS) to store detailed data rather than in the InfoCube as it may contribute considerably to the increase in the query (keep detailed data out of the InfoCube) and system performance (due to higher throughput during data load since PSA uses TRFC rather than IDOC).
Regards
Naga

Similar Messages

Why are the options for "When Firefox starts" NOT clickable in Firefox 5? I want to choose "Windows and tabs that where opened last time you accessed the net" but Firefox won't let me.

In the previous version of Firefox one could choose to save tabs so that when Firefox opened, all the tabs from the previous sessions appeared. This was done in Settings > Options > General > Startup. In the menu for the "When Firefox Starts" one had the option for "Windows and tabs that where opened last time you accessed the net." in Firefox 5.0, this menu is gray and not clickable. Help, please?

''Why are the options for "When Firefox starts" NOT clickable in Firefox 5?"
Possibly you are not saving your "browsing history" which is what the session history is tied into.
'''Not saving History''' -- check your settings for '''Tools > options > Privacy'''', make sure you are not clearing more than just cache in "Settings for Clearing History"
* http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/4928/clearcachew.png
* clearing your history at end of session, cache is the only one you would want to clear at end of session, if you don't want to lose things
There are several things that are related to private browsing and not saving History
* Private Browsing Ctrl+Shift+P
* You selected "Never remember history" in first drop-down of Tools > Options Privacy and all of the check marks disappear (See picture above)
* "Permanent private browsing mode" was check-marked under "Use custom settings for history" in the first drop-down of Tools > options > Privacy (see picture above)

Why no RAID options for new disks?

Hi support group,
"My name is Shaun, and I am a mac-aholic"
I inserted 4 new 3TB disks into the bays of my Mac Pro (2012), and there is no RAID option for them.
How I got here:
Inserted the WD Red drives, and they were not initiated.
I "erased" the drives, gave them names, and they appear in Disk Utility in grey drives.
Went to set up the RAID, and move the drives into the RAID, but got an error that they could not be used.
It appears to me that disk utility is not allowing me to fully use those drives. I Have created RAID drives before with no issue in RAID1 with 3TB drives before on this machine. Am perplexed, I thought this to be the easy and simple part of my upgrade odyssey! Did I screw up the initialization? On all FOUR drives?
Now, if I click on the drives, the RAID option does not present itself.
FWIW, I am using OS X 10.9.5, on Mac Pro 5,1. I boot from PCIe card. My end goal is to create a 4-disk RAID 10 using the four SATA connections on the MP.

It was really pretty simple based on your feedback, I powered down, removed the drives from the SATA backplane, moved each drive separately to the USB enclosure, then re-"erased" in OSX-Etended. I ejected each drive when finished, and moved to the next one until all four were re-"erased". Then I restarted the Mac with all four in the SATA connections, and all four were visible and had the RAID option tab. I created the three RAID schemes (two stripe and one mirror), and dragged the drives into the RAID option. Then I hit "create" or some other command to finish the RAID.
Note that I did get an error on the RAID creation. From memory, this was "cannot create RAID without an unmounted disk" or something like that. I cleared the error, and then opened back up Disk Utility. All the RAIDs were listed, and were operational with the green "On" signal. I could read/write/transfer from the RAID. Once I transfer the data to this RAID, I will work on a way to test it, but if any risk to the data, I might just leave well enough alone.
For now, it seems I have a fully functional RAID 1+0 using the four HDD on the SATA connections in my Mac Pro 5,1.

Why a Windows option for Banner Printing & Not MAC?

I was told by Epson that MAC doesn't offer a Banner option for my Epson Printer, but that there is an option for the Windows platform. This seems strange to me, especially when MAC is supposed to be the better graphics machine.
Does anyone know why this is the case? Is it just a question of limited printer driver options that Apple offers?
[No one was able to answer my specific question so I've made this one more general.]
Power Mac G4 & PowerBook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.8) Epson Stylus Photo R1800

I was told by Epson that MAC doesn't offer a
Banner
option for my Epson Printer, but that there is an
option for the Windows platform. This seems
strange
to me, especially when MAC is supposed to be the
better graphics machine.
It is not that Macs don't offer a banner option for
you Epson printer. Rather, it is the Epson printer
driver that doesn't offer this feature on the Mac
platform. There is a significant difference between
the two statements.
Does anyone know why this is the case? Is it just
a
question of limited printer driver options that
Apple
offers?
Apple does not write the printer drivers. Apple
includes many manufacturer's drivers with the
installation of Mac OS X, but Apple did not write
them. I do not know why Epson doesn't provide the
banner option you mentioned in your first post. Any
further statement would probably amount to
speculation and is not appropriate or permitted in
these forums. What I can state as fact is that many,
many software programs have more features in their
Windows versions than in their Mac releases.
[No one was able to answer my specific question so
I've made this one more general.]
As to your original question, I did a quick look on
VersionTracker and and found a freeware program Tiler that may be of help to you.
Matt
Mac Mini G4; B&W
G3/300
Matt,
Yes I do know that Apple doesn't write the drivers, however, they still provide the protocols & interface for both platforms. So it's hard to figure why Windows has a driver with a banner option while a MAC doesn't.
Nevertheless Matt, I do appreciate the heads-up about Tiler. If it works out, it will be a God-send for what I do.
Thanks for taking the time to respond!
Power Mac G4 & PowerBook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.8) Epson Stylus Photo R1800

Why no SCALE option for lightbox images?

Need SCALE options for lightbox images!
Must have SCALE DOWN option.
Images must scale down to display correctly on a smaller screen.
Currently Muse Lightbox FAILS on smaller browser screens.
Adobe please include this feature ASAP!

Thanks for the reply
The problem with the Fullscreen Lightbox is that the images scale up and pixelate on a larger browser viewport.
(To avoid this requires a very large image that makes loading slow)
So for Fullscreen Lightbox I would like a SCALE DOWN ONLY option (requested previously). Then the images would not scale up above 100% and would float centred on larger browser viewports (FIT PROPORTIONALLY option used).
And for the standard lightbox a scale option, as requested above, would mean the image doesn't overflow on a smaller browser viewport.
The reason for asking for scale options is to keep images looking their best at 100%, and downscaling for smaller browser ports.

Why no BTO option for 7200 RPM Drive in 13" MBP???

There is no BTO option for a 7200 RPM drive in the 13", but there is for the 15" and 17". Does this mean they won't fit/work in the 13", or is Apple just not offering it?
Thanks..
Message was edited by: solsun

It means Apple is not offering it. There are 7200 rpm drives with the proper form factor (9.5 mm height). The heat difference is not significant. As I recall, when the MBP line first came out, 7200 rpm drives were available on the 17" MBPs, but not on the 15" models. You can't get a new 13" MBP with anything faster than a 2.53 GHz CPU, either - it's just a differentiation point. You can get the stock capacity drive on the 13" MBP, and put in a 500 GB 7200 rpm drive yourself.

Why do the options for a new Home page always appear first when I sign in when I already have a Home page?

The screen page for creating a new Firefox Home page always shows up first when I sign on.....but, I already have a Home page and have to click again to get there.
How can I get Firefox to go directly to my actual Home page?

Hello Kathie,
Sorry for the inconvenience that has caused to you.
Please let me know if you have tried converting any other PDF to word with Reader.
Alos, please sign up at "https://cloud.acrobat.com/" using your Adobe ID credentials. Click on 'ExportPDF' tab and upload the PDF that you want to convert to Word.
Let me know if this converts fine.
Hope to hear from you.
regards,
Anubha

Why not an option for this?

I’ve gone back to Safari after years with Chrome because of the many problems I was having with the Flash extension. I like Safari again. It is more stable since I used it last. I'm still on Snow Leopard. I miss more than a few things about Chrome but there is ONE THING, however, that I really can't stand about Safari. Safari NEEDS an option to right click on selected text, select "Search with [your favorite NSA approved brower]," but open the search in a NEW TAB !!! It only searches in the same tab right now, which is very inconvenient. Either a check box in prefs or key combination-click or something. But please, make it SOMETHING. I'm so tired of having to copy the text, open a new tab, paste the text in search, and hit return. I know, life is rough sometimes but it doesn't have to be any rougher, does it?

>> ...right click on selected text, select "Search with..." but open the search in a NEW TAB !!! It only searches in the same tab right now ... Either a check box in prefs or key combination-click or something...
pressing the Command (Apple) key when clicking 'Search with...' opens the search in a new tab
Command-Shift-click makes that new tab active.
Command - Option - (Shift) does the same, but in a new window

Imovie media browser only has one option, "Mobile". other videos had option for medium and small. mobile option wont import into iDVD. other videos gave me the Medium option, why not this one?

help! imovie media browser only has one option, "Mobile". other videos had option for medium and small. mobile option wont import into iDVD. other videos gave me the Medium option, why not this one? need answers ASAP!

That is your answer then.
Large is 960x540
Medium is 640x480 (or 720x480)
Mobile is probably 480x272.
It is offering you the sizes that make sense given the size of your source material.
As a trick, you might try this. In your project, put a short 640x480 clip in the project as the first clip of the project. Then keep the rest of the project as is. See if it will let you share now in Medium. It will not look as good, because there are not enough pixels to cover the Medium size, but it might work.

Why Has Adobe Removed The Option For Individuals To Purchase Software And Not Use The Cloud?

As an individual who has been using Adobe products for about 25 years for my personal use and not as a business, I find the new policy of "renting" the software and using "The Cloud" for, at least in my case, a prohibitive monthly fee, to be totally unacceptable and will result in my no longer being able to afford using Adobe products. I do not understand why Adobe cannot offer their new cloud program for individuals and companies that may wish to use the new system and have the resources to pay in perpertuity, but they should also have the option for those of us who would rather purchase upgrades for whatever programs we use and keep them on our computer without "The Cloud" service.
I am 67 years old and living on a fixed income. I basically use four adobe programs... Photoshop, Premiere, After Effects, and Audition as I do volunteer work at a local non-profit radio and tv organization. If I were to "rent" those individually it would cost $80 per month... so I could take the next deal and get access to all software for $50 per month... I cannot afford either of those. If I could upgrade one or more of the programs every two or three years... keeping them on my computer and not using "The Cloud," then continuing to use the products would be doable. However, being forced into a program that requires a monthly fee and use of "The Cloud" which I do not need to use, seems totally unfair. I certainly understand that there are businesses and individuals who will love the new program, but why not have the option? Or perhaps a "Senior" discount as you do for educators and students?
Something to think about. It seems Adobe may be moving to the "Cable Television" model of monthly fees that will go no where but up.

Hey there, you may have heard that Adobe is continuing to sell and support CS6 for customers who prefer traditional licensing. It's last year's version instead of the latest-and-greatest CC release, but it's something to consider if that's important to you.
As far as a "senior discount" on Adobe software, there has never been one – but one thing to consider is becoming a student or teacher because there is no age restriction on that, in which case you may become eligible for education discounts.
Hope this helps.

Why do I not get the checkout option for a pdf type document when clicking on the document link in the SharePoint workflow task?

We are trying to use workflows to review and edit pdf files in sharepoint 2010. We are having a couple of issues and am hoping someone has the answer.....
1) When myself and coworkers click on the pdf document in the library, we get the check out option as expected. However when we click on the document
link in a workflow task (on the sharepoint site), the pdf opens as a temporary file and we do not get the check out option. Why does this happen?????
2) The same thing happens when we click on the document link in the workflow task email; HOWEVER, one of our co-workers does get the
check out option when clicking on the link in the email task. Why would she get the checkout option using the email and not when clicking on the link in the task list on the sharepoint site ???? We have compared our internet settings and adobe
settings to ours and found no differences.
We are using Sharepoint 2010, Windows 7, IE8, Adobe Reader X or XI. Some of us have Adobe Pro X and have the same issues.

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you could not get the checkout option for a pdf type document when clicking on the document link in the SharePoint workflow task.
I try to reproduce the issue, however, no matter when I click the pdf type document in the library or click on the pdf document link in the workflow task email, it download the pdf doucment and then I can open it.
It will be better if you can descript how you
get the check out option as expected when you click on the pdf document in the library.
Then I upload a
word type document to the library, no matter when I click the word type document in the library or click on the word document link in the workflow task email, I can open the word document directly and get the check out option as expected.
I recommend to use the other type docuemts to check whether the check out option works.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

I was wondering why the iPhone 5 has the option for a battery percentage and the iPod touch 5g doesn't? I mean... they are almost both the same thing... just the iPod does not have the phone.

I was wondering why the iPhone 5 has the option for a battery percentage and the iPod touch 5g doesn't? I mean... they are almost both the same thing... just the iPod does not have the phone.

One likely reason is the % battery is not that accurate because of the smaller battery capacity in the iPod compared to iPhone and iPad. Users why use a % battery app post that the % reading changes a lot.

HT2534 Why is there not an option for none because i dont have a credit card and there is no none button

Why is there not an option for none because i dont have a credit card and there is no none button

Create a new ID by following the steps in this article exactly as written: http://support.apple.com/kb/ht2534. Pay attention to step 3; you must first download and install any free app then create the ID.

Why there is no option for WRT54G Version 7??? the versin...

Why there is no option for WRT54G Version 7??? the versin no. jump from 6 to 8??Which firm ware should I download?

For US no vesrion 7 is released. Might be in other countries.

Why different ways to access options for tools?

Sometimes options for tools are in the Control panel, sometime you double click on the tool, and sometimes you double click on the Artboard?
Is there a reason it works this way? Just trying to understand the logic to make it easier to figure out which way to access options for which tools.
Thanks!

Each area you sighted has different options. That's why they are different.
Items in the Control Bar are generally items you'll adjust per use.
Items by double-clicking the tool are generally set once per session, or once ever.
I don't know what you are referring to by "double-clicking the artboard" As far as I'm aware, that only enters or exits Isolation Mode. (And can be turned off in the preferences.)

Why thet gave option for idoc in bw

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for