Why set up table not used in applications like FI, HR etc

Hi,
We all know that we use set up tables for LO Cockpit applications.
But we dont have for non LO applications like HR , FI...why such a difference is made by SAP...
One of the fellow suggested that for FI, HR etc, there is huge posting of data and so we dont want to store such a duplicate data
is this the case?
or there is some other reason...
please suggest the same
Thanking You,
Tarun Brijwani.

Hi,
this question has already been asked a few times. Please search the forums for the answer.
regards
Siggi

Similar Messages

Why is this query not using the index?

check out this query:-
SELECT CUST_PO_NUMBER, HEADER_ID, ORDER_TYPE, PO_DATE
FROM TABLE1
WHERE STATUS = 'N'
and here's the explain plan:-
1
2     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3     | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
4     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5     | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 2735K| 140M| 81036 (2)|
6     |* 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| TABLE1 | 2735K| 140M| 81036 (2)|
7     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8
9     Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
10     ---------------------------------------------------
11
12     1 - filter("STATUS"='N')
There is already an index on this column, as is shown below:-
     INDEX_NAME INDEX_TYPE     UNIQUENESS     TABLE_NAME     COLUMN_NAME     COLUMN_POSITION
1     TABLE1_IDX2 NORMAL     NONUNIQUE     TABLE1      STATUS     1
2     TABLE1_IDX NORMAL     NONUNIQUE     TABLE1     HEADER_ID     1
So why is this query not using the index on the 'STATUS' Column?
I've already tried using optimizer hints and regathering the stats on the table, but the execution plan still remains the same, i.e. it still uses a FTS.
I have tried this command also:-
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('GECS','GEPS_CS_SALES_ORDER_HEADER',method_opt=>'for all indexed columns size auto',cascade=>true,degree=>4);
inspite of this, the query is still using a full table scan.
The table has around 55 Lakh records, across 60 columns. And because of the FTS, the query is taking a long time to execute. How do i make it use the index?
Please help.
Edited by: user10047779 on Mar 16, 2010 6:55 AM

If the cardinality is really as skewed as that, you may want to look at putting a histogram on the column (sounds like it would be in order, and that you don't have one).
create table skewed_a_lot
as
   select
      case when mod(level, 1000) = 0 then 'N' else 'Y' end as Flag,
      level as col1
   from dual connect by level <= 1000000;
create index skewed_a_lot_i01 on skewed_a_lot (flag);
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 'SKEWED_A_LOT', cascade => true, method_opt => 'for all indexed columns size auto');Is an example.

I made the purchase association for more than a week, but even having already received confirmation of payment and the invoice , I can not use the application . I am being told I do not have no purchase on my name

I made the purchase association for more than a week, but even having already received confirmation of payment and the invoice , I can not use the application . I am being told I do not have no purchase on my name. What i must to do ?

Does your Cloud subscription show on your account page?
https://www.adobe.com/account.html for subscriptions on your Adobe page

I don't have a computer on which to convert a digital booklet in iTunes to a useable form for iBooks. Why won't it download using the cloud like all the other media I purchase on my ipad?

I don't have a computer on which to convert a digital booklet in iTunes to a useable form for iBooks. Why won't it download using the cloud like all the other media I purchase on my ipad?

LP content can only be downloaded on a computer's iTunes (or 1st gen Apple TV), you can't download them on an iOS device - and I haven't seen anything that say it will change in iOS 8. If you don't have a computer then at the moment you won't be able to download/view LP content
About LP : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3823
After you buy an album with iTunes LP on an iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch, the album's songs will download directly to the device. The iTunes LP will download to iTunes on your computer when you choose Store > Check for Available Downloads.

Can not use feacebook whats app app world etc.

my Z 10 app world will not do any updates the error message is that there was an error processing your request help me please can not use feacebook whats app app world etc.
Subject Title edited to reflect new topic.

Restart or take out the Battery ( Battery Pullout ) and insert it after few minutes
Regards Eree - Follow me on Twitter - Facebook - Google+
For More visit My Blog

Why is my SQL not using an index?

I have a small SQL query (10g) where I join to basic table together on a customer_id column.
select *
from customer c
inner join work_item sp1 ON sp1.customer_id = c.customer_id
and I am using TOAD, which tells me (in the Explain Plan area), that I'm doing a "TABLE ACCESS FULL" scan on the customer table.
But when I look at the details of BOTH tables, I can clearly see that they both have an index on the customer field, and they are both the same data types...
The interesting thing, is that if I change the query to only select data from the work_item table,
select sp1.*
from customer c
inner join work_item sp1 ON sp1.customer_id = c.customer_id
I can see that the indexes are being used...
Why is this? I must be able to select certain columns from the customer table, but why would it not use an index when I do?
Thanks!

If I understand correctly, below is a simple test case.
I created a small table and indexed "object_id" column.
When I issue "Select * from t" optimizer goes with FULL TABLE SCAN, whereas wehn "select OBJECT_ID from t" is issued, optimizer chooses to read from the index instead of accessing the table. This is because FAST FULL SCAN is far cheaper than a FTS in this case.
SQL> create table t as select object_id, object_name from all_objects;
Table created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> create index t_idx1 on t(object_id);
Index created.
SQL> set autotrace traceonly exp
SQL> select * from t;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1601196873
| Id | Operation         | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |      | 37932 | 1074K|    55   (2)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| T | 37932 | 1074K| 55 (2)| 00:00:01 |
SQL> select object_id from t;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3958994525
| Id | Operation            | Name   | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT     |        | 37932 |   185K|    25   (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| T_IDX1 | 37932 | 185K| 25 (0)| 00:00:01 |
SQL>

Why Set up table in LO Extraction ?

Hi All,
In LO Extraction we have filling up of set up tables for doing Init and then delta falls into update table etc then using V3 collective run push it to Delta Queue. Then we extract into BW. Why in LO alone this is the methodology for extraction and why not in other extractions like COPA or HR or FISL or anything ? What is the reason for these unique steps in LO extraction alone ?
Kindly let me know the answer.
Best Regards,
Fanie Hudson.

This question has already been posted several times and lot of documents are available.
Have a look at these discussions:
set up tables
Set up tables
Set up tables
view of set up tables data in se11??????????
Set Up tables..
lo: delete set up tables: DOUBT
Blogs of Roberto will be useful as well:
/people/sap.user72/blog/2004/12/16/logistic-cockpit-delta-mechanism--episode-one-v3-update-the-145serializer146
LOGISTIC COCKPIT DELTA MECHANISM - Episode two: V3 Update, when some problems can occur...
LOGISTIC COCKPIT DELTA MECHANISM - Episode three: the new update methods
LOGISTIC COCKPIT - WHEN YOU NEED MORE - First option: enhance it !
LOGISTIC COCKPIT: a new deal overshadowed by the old-fashioned LIS ?
award points if useful

Why my select is not using the index

This is my index
CREATE INDEX CONFIG_STATE_IDX ON IDENTIFIER
(CONFIGURATION_ID, STATE)
LOGGING
TABLESPACE NII_INDEX
PCTFREE 10
INITRANS 2
MAXTRANS 255
STORAGE (
INITIAL 64K
MINEXTENTS 1
MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0
FREELISTS 1
FREELIST GROUPS 1
BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT
NOPARALLEL;
This is my select statement:
SELECT *
FROM identifier i
WHERE
     i.configuration_id = '89afead40a0c0b8d00628c59aa405ea4'
     AND i.state = 'QT'
AND ROWNUM <6
This is my exmplain plan result
Operation     Object Name     Rows     Bytes     Cost     Object Node     In/Out     PStart     PStop
SELECT STATEMENT Hint=CHOOSE          5           2128
COUNT STOPKEY
TABLE ACCESS FULL     IDENTIFIER     133 K     19 M     2128
Why it is not using the index on configuration_id and state.

Possibility one: you didn't do an analyze statistics on the table and/or the index after index creation.
Possibility two: The optimizer has determined that it can return the query result set with fewer I/Os if it does a FTS vs using the index (the optimizer is very keen on I/Os).

How to set dreamweaver to not use CSS?

I know it is frowned upon to not use CSS, but, the reason why
I want everything done in HTML is because I want to list my page on
ebay, and ebay does not support the use of css, or at least it
seems that way, everything has to be purely done in HTML, is there
a way to set dreamweaver so that it does not automatically make my
formating turn to CSS?
Thanks,
Bill.

.oO(BKolos)
>I know it is frowned upon to not use CSS, but, the reason
why I want everything
>done in HTML is because I want to list my page on an
auction, and this auction
>does not support the use of css, everything has to be
purely done in HTML
If it's about eBay or a similar platform, then in fact you
can use CSS.
You just have to add a 'style' element to the page body(!) to
link to an
external stylesheet. It's completely invalid HTML, because
the 'style'
element belongs to the document's head, but it should work in
almost
every browser. And since usually the rest of the auction page
is invalid
HTML anyway, it doesn't really hurt either.
See if this helps.
Micha

Why is configuration workbench not used often

Hello all, I am working on an HRMS implementation. Now, the project manager (from client company) has most likely been to some oracle presentation and says the configuration workbench is used to create the company structure. Here is the problem for me, I have never used this in any implementation. Also, I couldn't find a way to modify the key flexfields (like Job, Position) etc and as if this wasn't bad enough, the client implementation requires the creation of numerous additional EITs, SITs etc.
How does a consultant explain not using the configuration workbench? What are the reasons this tool is not typically used (as I have never used or seen anybody use it in 6 years working in oracle hrms)?
Many Thanks

Configuration Workbench is good, and has got quite a bit better over recent releases.
Sure, it doesn't configure everything. But I'm not sure your choice is that black and white: why not use Config Workbench where it helps and do the other config manually. If it doesn't do anything useful for you (unlikely) I'm sure your PM would listen.
This sounds like a good opportunity for you to learn something new as well...

Why my iphone5 can not use the weather function with the mobile internet?

I just bought an iphone5, but the weather software doesn't work if not using wifi, the support people told me that Apple desined this only for wifi, but I don't think so, pls help to find a solution

As the attached article shows, AirPlay Mirroring requires an iMac to be from mid-2011 or newer.
You should be able to use AirPlay to send music (but not video or pictures) from your iMac to speakers.
http://support.apple.com/kb/SP654

Set KOKRS for ECATTs using CO-Transactions like KP06

Dear Collegues,
how can i make sure the ECATT i create does set the KOKRS if nessessary for transactions like KP06 for example?
I just did record the KP06 transaction now and defined the paramters as following:
KOKRS     Kostenrechnungskreis          I     KOKRS          C     4
VERSION     Version               I     VERSN          C     3
PERVON     Periode ab               I     KPLA_PERBL          N     3
PERBIS     Periode bis               I     KPLA_PERBL          N     3
GJAHR     Geschäftsjahr          I     GJAHR          N     4
KOSTL     Kostenstelle               I     KOSTL          C     10
KOART     Kostenart               I     KSTAR          C     10
PLANFIX     Geplante Fixkoste          I     WERTV8          P     15     2
VS     Verteilschlüssel          I     SPRED          C     4
My problem is now, how to set the KOKRS to the value of the import-file, which is including all fields mentioned above within this KP06 ECATT? I just thought about smth. like following:
IF KOKRS = ' '.
ABAP.
ENDABAP.
But how to use the values from the importfile here?
Any other more easy solutions for this issue?
Thanks a lot in advance
Best regards
Carsten Klatt
Endif.
TCD ( KP06 , KP06_RECORD_2 ).

You do not need a separate input file, just use internal variants for the test data in the eCATT test configuration or handle you data for input in external variant files (which have format of csv).
See also the [online help|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_smehp1/helpdata/de/da/f1383fe58d5900e10000000a114084/content.htm].
Kind regards,
Christoph

How to track changes on the table not using triggers

Hi,
I would like to track DML changes on the tables. As I have many tables it is not efficient to write triggers.
Is there any setup I can do at database level.
I am using 11g R2.
Thanks

thanks fran.
I would like to know old and new data in case of updates. This method will not show me.are you sure??
SQL> sho parameter audit_trail
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
audit_trail                          string      DB, EXTENDED
SQL> audit select, insert, update on fran.test1;
AuditorÝa terminada correctamente.
SQL> conn fran/fran
Conectado.
SQL> select * from test1;
ninguna fila seleccionada
SQL> insert into fran.test1 values('EX',2);
1 fila creada.
SQL> update fran.test1 set object_id=3 where object_id=2;
1 fila actualizada.
SQL> commit;
Confirmaci¾n terminada.
SQL> conn / as sysdba
Conectado.
SQL> select sqltext from aud$ where sqltext is not null;
SQLTEXT
select * from test1
insert into fran.test1 values('EX',2)
update fran.test1 set object_id=3 where object_id=2If you want more data, FGA is your goal
I have read some where on flashback database ..
would this create a replica table with old changesflashback database is to set the current data like in the past. I mean:
SQL> conn / as sysdba
Conectado.
SQL> alter table fran.test1 enable row movement;
Tabla modificada.
SQL> drop table fran.test1;
Tabla borrada.
SQL> select * from fran.test1;
select * from fran.test1
ERROR en lÝnea 1:
ORA-00942: la tabla o vista no existe
SQL> flashback table fran.test1 to before drop;
Flashback terminado.
SQL> select * from fran.test1;
OBJECT_NAME                    OBJECT_ID
EX                             3

Why is this query not using my index ?

hey
i have the following situation
(i'm sorry but i can't add the acctual script or output)
create table x as
select      level high_card ,
     mod(level,1000) medium_card ,
     mod(level,10) low_card ,
     '***' padding
from     dual
connect by level < 100001;
create index x_med_low_ix on x(low_card,medium_card);
create index x_high_ix on x(high_card);
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'x',cascade=>true,method_opt=>'for all indexed columns size auto');
i'm running the following query
select      *
from      x
where      low_card = 70
and     medium_card = 70
and     high_card = 70;
i'm expecting a range scan on the x_high_ix index. the optimizer expects only one row. the stats on the high_card columns shows that (num_rows * density = 1).
when i run the query the optimizer uses the x_med_low_ix and does 14 cr.
when i force the use of x_high_ix the cr goes down to 4.
i don't want to declare x_high_ix as unique.
so, why isn't he using my index ?

It's using that index for me:
SQL> create table x as
2 select level high_card ,
3 mod(level,1000) medium_card ,
4 mod(level,10) low_card ,
5 '***' padding
6 from dual
7 connect by level < 100001;
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> create index x_med_low_ix on x(low_card,medium_card);
Index created.
SQL>
SQL> create index x_high_ix on x(high_card);
Index created.
SQL>
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'x',cascade=>true,method_opt=>'for all indexed columns
size auto');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1   select *
2   from x
3   where low_card = 70
4   and medium_card = 70
5* and high_card = 70
SQL>
SQL> /
no rows selected
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 775193209
| Id | Operation                   | Name      | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |           |     1 |    15 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| X         |     1 |    15 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2 |   INDEX RANGE SCAN          | X_HIGH_IX |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   1 - filter("LOW_CARD"=70 AND "MEDIUM_CARD"=70)
   2 - access("HIGH_CARD"=70)
Statistics
          0 recursive calls
          0 db block gets
          3 consistent gets
          0 physical reads
          0 redo size
        454 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
        370 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
          1 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
          0 sorts (memory)
          0 sorts (disk)
          0 rows processed
SQL> set autot off
SQL> select * from v$version;
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE    10.2.0.1.0      Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.1.0 - Productionwhat is your version?
By the way, when i force optimizer to use index X_MED_LOW_IX, it does 2 CR for me.

Why are scratch disks not used in PS CC 2014

When editing very large project that include several layers of images and smart objects, I'm often using up all available RAM. Just as 14GB is reached, I get an out of RAM error and can't save (usually the smart objects updating is what kicks the error in)
OK, I'm out of RAM. But I've set up a 400GB scratch disk drive in Preferences. Why is that not being accessed in order to finish the operation?

OK Here's the system and settings you asked for:
I moved the memory usage slider from 10518 all the way up to 99% as shown and it just allowed more RAM usage (as expected).
My hard drives are healthy:
Let me know if you see anything of interest.
Thanks

Why set up table not used in applications like FI, HR etc

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for