Width of Speech Bubles Altered

I'm going to sound like a complete and utter idiot, but here goes.
I was doing something on my computer, and I must've hit some kind of command on my keyboard, becuase the messages on my skype screen were suddenly condensed - meaning that the width of the "speech boxes" so to speak were suddenly a lot smaller than they had been before. They previously filled out to either side of my Skype, but here's an image example of what it looks like now:
So this is how it looks now, and with red arrows I've indicated what it looked like before:
Anybody know how to fix this? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

For posterity, it's worth mentioning that the solution is to hover the mouse over either side (left or right) of the input field. You'll get a resize-left-and-right cursor and you'll be able to drag the chat history view wider and narrower.

Similar Messages

Using inline tags in text to speech to alter pronunciation and other things

We're converting a weekly paper newspaper into speech, then to iTunes as mp3s to cut a CD or stick via Garage Band for a number of sight-impaired subscribers.
We've been using TextEdit to edit the text that we receive as pdfs (or copy/paste from the newspaper website) to make it suitable for listeners and of course shorter. Problem is, that some words are mispronounced, and we sometimes need longer pauses between paragraphs.
We get around the mispronunciation by mis-spelling words. That has been working for us, although Voice Over has exactly what we want from the pronuniation point of view, but does not work with the application we're using.
We've also worked out how to use some inline tags, such as [[slnc 5000]] but examples such as [[pron sym]]="h eh 1 l ow & w er 1 l d "[[/]] simply don't work. What am I missing? Do I need to go to a specific set of xml or other tags or a standard set of tags that always work with Apple's tts engine?
Look forward to a positive result.

absolutely nothing bad will happen if you use a keyboard shortcut that's designated for something else. if you don't know it it means you don't use it so what's the problem? just use anything you like. use commandoptionL. that's not used for anything.

Please, please give us an option for a minimalisti...

look at this interface.. since the new update I have only 13 contacts visible instead of the previous 19 contact due to the new UI design. and that is when all options are as minimal as possible.
I love skype, I use it every day intensively for work. I have over 50 contacts in there and don't want to scroll all the time to find who I want to talk too.
Searching for each contact is also ineffecient. it requires me to tick the search box, type character, find it in the list and then contact them.
so please make an option in the new version to have a minimalistic contact list as the suggested v6.3. it compacts the buttons on top and with the v6.21 list spacing you can have 25 contacts visible in a skype window of 770 pixels.
Then it's no problem to just double click the one you need directly without scrolling or searching all the time.

David184 wrote:
i'm kinda ok with it. but i really hate the way Chat looks like. i know you guys are trying to make it look as much as possible to windows 8's look but i don't think it works for me because i think the chat looks more fatter. i don't like that chat has speech bubles now. so microsoft. if you can. then please rollback this update. i don't think that this update will work for people
Uninstall the currently installed 6.22 version and install the previous 6.21.0.104 version:
http://download.skype.com/msi/SkypeSetup_6.21.0.104.msi

Video flickering when published live from camera

I am getting flickered image when published from live camera.
Settings done for view of flash player in html page and settings done before publishing in actionscript is as follows:
setting in HTML:
size of flash player object in html page is 240*180
setting in actionscript:
stage size is 216*162
size of video component is 216*162
camera.setMode varies as:- camera.setMode(160,120,6) //////////////in this case there is a flickering
camera.setMode(320,240,8) //////////////in this case there is a flickering
camera.setMode(640,480,2) //////////////in this case there is no flickering.
Now what I have tried to resolve the issue:
1) changed the size in html to 320*240
2) set the stage size to 320*240
3) size of video component to 320*240
I have tried all permutations for the above three scenario but still not got the solution.
I have also tried to make the size of video component as per the camera height and width respectively, with/ without altering the size of stage, still no success.
Please help.
Thanks in advance
Nitesh

first thing to try is to upgrade your video driver. if the issue still persists, please enter a bug here: https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm
please attach your dxdiag info in the bug - http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/839/cpsid_83952.html#main_For_Windows_users

How to alter width of navigation region

Is there a way to alter the width of the Navigation Region Alternative 1? I am using it to display links to other pages, but the descriptions are bumping onto three and four lines, making it cumbersome.

Hi,
In Shared Components, Templates there is a template for "Navigation Region, Alternative 1". In the Theme I'm looking at (Theme 18), this shows:
<div class="t18Region" id="#REGION_STATIC_ID#" #REGION_ATTRIBUTES# align="left" width="200">
<div class="NavigationRegionAlternative1"><h2>#TITLE#</h2>
<div class="t18RegionBody">#BODY#</div></div></div>so, in this case, I could adjust the width attribute at then end of the first line. I'm not sure what theme you're using, but it should be something similar.
Andy

IWeb header does not retain its altered width when publishing to a folder

I already had assistance to widen the web page header, and thought the problem was solved as below:
I want to use Watercolor template in iWeb 3.0.4 but when I widen the page the full image does not follow. Is there anything that can be done?
iMac 7,1 Intel Core 2 Duo, Mac OS X (10.6.8), 2.4Ghz
This solved my question by Roddy on Apr 6, 2012 1:04 PM
If, for example, you mean the header background image you would need to go into the iWeb package contents and replace the image with a wider one.
Here's an example of a page that's the "standard" 980 px wide instead of the iWeb default of 700px.
Control click the iWeb application and select "Show Package Contents"
Drill down through Contents/Resources/Themes
Control click "Watercolor.webtheme" and "Show Package Contents"
Open the "Shared" folder to get the image
I used EasyCrop to crop and resize the image to 980px X 90px and replaced the original with this wider one.
However, when I publish the site to a folder, the old size is retained. I have created new pages using the new enlarged header, but alas it is not retained when I publish.
I have noticed the privileges of the altered file have changed. Originally it was assigned to be read by Wheel. But as soon as the file is altered, Wheel no longer exists. Could this be the problem? Is there a work around?
Thanks

Is there a work around?
you can change it with javascript:
http://temp.cyclosaurus.com/revolving/1px_line_border2.html
copy the code in my page.
add an html snippet to your page, paste in the code, click apply button.

Refreshing Entity Objects after Altering the table

Hi,
My Entity Object is based on a table... and View Objects on the Entity Objects. Now if I alter the table (just changing the width of the column), that change is not visible on the Entity Object. Is there any way I can automatically refresh the Entity Objects after altering the table(only column width is changed).
(Changes made to Entity Objects manually are reflected in the View Object correctly.)
Regards
Faiyaz

'changing the width of the column' means changing the size of the column in the table description in the database. For e.g.. In the original table I had a column OIL_KEY NUMBER(6). Now I change the column to be of size 12 i.e. OIL_KEY NUMBER(12). This does not get refreshed in the Entity Object.

How to update a large (over 4 million item) List(Of Byte) quickly by altering indexes contained in a Dictionary(Of Integer, Byte) where the Dictionaries keys are the indexes in the List(Of Byte) that need to be changed to the values for those indexes?

   I'm having some difficulty with transferring images from a UDP Client to a UDP Server. The issue is receiving the bytes necessary to update an original image sent from the Client to the Server and updating the Servers List(Of Byte) with the
new bytes replacing bytes in that list. This is a simplex connection where the Sever receives and the Client sends to utilize the least amount of bandwidth for a "Remote Desktop" style application where the Server side needs image updates of whatever
occurs on the Client desktop.
   So far I can tranfer images with no issue. The images can be be any image type (.Bmp, .Gif, .JPeg, .Png, etc). I was working with sending .JPeg's as they appear to be the smallest size image when a Bitmap is saved to a memory stream as type
.JPeg. And then I am using GZip to compress that byte array again so it is much smaller. However on a loopback on my NIC the speed for sending a full size screen capture is not very fast as the Server updates fairly slowly unless the Clients screen capture
Bitmap is reduced in size to about 1/3'd of the original size. Then about 12000 bytes or less are sent for each update.
   Due to .JPeg compression I suppose there is no way to get the difference in bytes between two .JPegs and only send those when something occurs on the desktop that alters the desktop screen capture image. Therefore I went to using .Bmp's as each
.Bmp contains the same number of bytes in its array regardless of the image alterations on the desktop. So I suppose the difference in bytes from a second screen capture and an inital screen capture are what is different in the second image from the initial
image.
   What I have done so far is save an initial Bitmap of a screen capture using a memory stream and saving as type .Bmp which takes less than 93 milliseconds for 4196406 bytes. Compressing that takes less than 118 milliseconds to 197325 bytes for
the current windows on the desktop. When that is done PictureBox1 is updated from nothing to the captured image as the PictureBox's background image with image layout zoom and the PictureBox sized at 1/2 my screens width and 1/2 my screens height.
   Then I save a new Bitmap the same way which now contains different image information as the PictureBox is now displaying an image so its back color is no longer displayed (solid color Aqua) and the cursor has moved to a different location. The
second Bitmap is also 4196406 in bytes and compressed it was 315473 bytes in size.
   I also just found code from this link Converting a Bitmap to a Byte Array (and Byte Array to Bitmap) which gets a byte array
directly from a Bitmap and the size of that is 3148800 for whatever is full screen captured on my laptop. So I should be able to work with smaller byte arrays at some point.
   The issue I'm having is that once the Client sends an image of the desktop to the Server I only want to update the server with any differences occuring on the Clients desktop. So what I have done is compare the first screen captures bytes (stored
in a List(Of Byte)) to the second screen captures bytes (stored in a List(Of Byte)) by using a For/Next for 0 to 4196405 where if a byte in the first screen captures List is not equal to a byte in the second screen captures List I add the index and byte of
the second screen captures list to a Dictionary(Of Integer, Byte). The Dictionary then only contains the indexes and bytes that are different between the first screen capture and second screen capture. This takes about 125 milliseconds which I think is pretty
fast for 4196406 byte comparison using a For/Next and adding all the different bytes and indexes for each byte to a Dictionary.
    The difference in Bytes between the inital screen capture and the second screen capture is 242587 as an example which changes of course. For that amount of bytes the Dictionary contains 242587 integers as indexes and 242587 bytes as different
bytes totaling 485174 bytes for both arrays (keys, values). Compressed the indexes go from 242587 to 43489 bytes and the values go from 242587 to 34982 bytes. Which means I will have to send 78, 481 bytes from the Client to the Server to update the display
on the server. Quite smaller than the original 4196406 bytes of the second Bitmap saved to type .Bmp or the compressed size of that array which was 315473 bytes. Plus a few bytes I add as overhead so the server knows when an image array ends and how many packets
were sent for the array so it can discard complete arrays if necessary since UDP is lossfull although probably not so much in current networks like it may originally have been when the internet started.
    In reality the data from the Client to the Server will mostly be the cursor as it moves and updating the Server image with only a few hundred bytes I would imagine at a time. Or when the cursor selects a Button for example and the Buttons
color changes causing those differences in the original screen capture.
   But the problem is if I send the Dictionaries Indexes and Bytes to the Server then I need to update the original Bitmap List(Of Byte) on the server by removing the Bytes in the received informations Index locations array from the Servers Bitmap
List(Of Byte) and replacing those Bytes with the Bytes in the received informations Byte array. This takes so long using a For/Next for however many indexes are in the received informations Index array to update the Bitmap List(Of Byte) on the server using
"Bmp1Bytes.RemoveAt(Index As Integer)" followed by "Bmp1Bytes.Insert(Index As Integer, Item As Byte)" in the For/Next.
    I've tried various For/Next statements including using a new List(Of Byte) with If statements so If the the integer for the For/Next ='s the Key in a Dictionary(Of Integer, Byte) using a Counter to provide the Dictionaries Key value then
the Dictionaries byte value will be added to the List(Of Byte) and the counter will increas by one Else the List(Of Byte) adds the original "Bmp1Bytes" byte at that index to the new List(Of Byte). This takes forever also.
   I also tried the same For/Next adding to a new Dictionary(Of Integer, Byte) but that takes forever too.
   I think I could use RemoveRange and AddRange to speed things up. But I don't know how to retrieve a contiguous range of indexes in the received indexes that need to be updated in the servers "Bmp1Bytes" List(Of Byte) from the received
array of indexes and bytes which are in a Dictionary(Of Integer, Byte). But I believe this would even be slower than some realistic method for replacing all Bytes in a List(Of Byte) when I have the indexes that need to be replaced and the bytes to replace
them with.
   Even if I just used AddRange on a new List(Of Byte) to add ranges of bytes from the original "Bmp1Bytes" and the changes from the Dictionary(Of Integer, Byte) I think this would be rather slow. Although I don't know how to do that
by getting contiguous ranges of indexes from the Dictionaries keys.
   So I was wondering if there is some method perhaps using Linq or IEnumerable which I've been unable to figure anything out which could do this.
   I do have some copy and pasted code which I don't understand how it works that I am using which I would guess could be altered for doing something like this but I can't find information that provides how the code works. Or even if I did
maybe I can't understand it. Like the code below which is extremely fast.
   Dim strArray() As String = Array.ConvertAll(Of Integer, String)(BmpComparisonDict.Keys.ToArray, Function(x) x.ToString())
La vida loca

Monkeyboy,
That was quite a bit to read, but still a bit unclear. Could you put a specific list of goals/questions, asked in the smallest possible form?
It seems like either you're making a program that monitors activity on your computer, or you're writing some kind of remote pc app.
When you do get your bytes from using lockbits, keep in mind all the files header info would be lost. I think retaining the header info is worth the extra bytes.
The other, thing: I'm not sure if you're taking 32bpp screen shots, but also keep in mind that the "whole desktop" is the final destination for blended graphics, if that makes sense. What I mean is that there is no need to capture an "alpha"
channel for a desktop screenshot, as alpha would always be 255, this could save you 1 byte per pixel captured... Theres nothing "behind" the desktop, therefore no alpha, and every window shown above the desktop is already blended. I suggest using
24Bpp for a full screen capture.
Your X,Y information for the mouse could be stored as UINT16, this would save you a measly 2 bytes per location update/save.
When you update your byte arrays, maybe you can turn the array into a stream and write to whatever index, however many bytes, that should prevent a "Shift" of bytes, and instead overwrite any bytes that "get in the way".
ex
Dim example As String = "This is an example."
Dim insertString As String = "was"
Dim insertBytes As Byte() = System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(insertString)
Dim bytes As Byte() = System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes(example)
Dim modifiedBytes As Byte() = {}
Using ms As New System.IO.MemoryStream(bytes)
ms.Position = 5
ms.Write(insertBytes, 0, 3)
modifiedBytes = ms.ToArray
End Using
Dim newString As String = System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetString(modifiedBytes)
'Notice how below there isn't the word "is" anymore, and that there isn't a
'space.
'This demonstrates that you overwrite existing data, versus shifting everything to
'the right.
'Returns: This wasan example.
MsgBox(newString)
“If you want something you've never had, you need to do something you've never done.”
Don't forget to mark
helpful posts and answers
! Answer an interesting question? Write a
new article
about it! My Articles
*This post does not reflect the opinion of Microsoft, or its employees.
Well it's too much to read. I was really tired when I wrote it. Even the below is too much to read but perhaps gets the point across of what I would like to do which I think
Joel Engineer may have answered but I'm not sure. As I'm still too tired to understand that yet and research what he said in order to figure it out yet.
But maybe the code below can provide the concept of the operation with the comments in it. But seeing as how I'm still tired it may be confused.
Option Strict On
Imports System.Windows.Forms
Imports System.IO
Imports System.IO.Compression
Imports System.Drawing.Imaging
Imports System.Runtime.InteropServices
Public Class Form1
Dim Bmp1Bytes As New List(Of Byte)
Dim Bmp1BytesCompressed As New List(Of Byte)
Dim Bmp2Bytes As New List(Of Byte)
Dim BmpComparisonDict As New Dictionary(Of Integer, Byte)
Dim BmpDifferenceIndexesCompressed As New List(Of Byte)
Dim BmpDifferenceBytesCompressed As New List(Of Byte)
Private Sub Button1_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click
SomeSub()
End Sub
Private Sub SomeSub()
' Pretend this code is in UDP Client app. A screen capture is performed of the desktop. Takes about 90 milliseconds.
Bmp1Bytes.Clear()
Using BMP1 As New Bitmap(Screen.PrimaryScreen.Bounds.Width, Screen.PrimaryScreen.Bounds.Height)
Using g1 As Graphics = Graphics.FromImage(BMP1)
g1.CopyFromScreen(0, 0, 0, 0, BMP1.Size)
Cursor.Draw(g1, New Rectangle(Cursor.Position.X, Cursor.Position.Y, Cursor.Size.Width, Cursor.Size.Height))
Using MS As New MemoryStream
BMP1.Save(MS, System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageFormat.Bmp)
Bmp1Bytes.AddRange(MS.ToArray)
End Using
End Using
End Using
Bmp1BytesCompressed.AddRange(Compress(Bmp1Bytes.ToArray))
' UDP Client app sends Bmp1BytesCompressed.ToArray to UDP Server which is the entire image of the desktop that the UDP
' Client is on. This image takes awhile to send since compressed it is about 177000 bytes from over 4000000 bytes.
' I will be using different code just to get the bytes from the actual Bitmap in the future. That is not important for now.
' Pretend the UDP Server has received the bytes, decompressed the array received into a List(Of Byte) and is displaying
' the image of the UDP Clients desktop in a PictureBox.
' Now the image on the UDP Clients desktop changes due to the mouse cursor moving as an example. Therefore a new Bitmap
' is created from a screen capture. This takes about 90 milliseconds.
Bmp2Bytes.Clear()
Using BMP2 As New Bitmap(Screen.PrimaryScreen.Bounds.Width, Screen.PrimaryScreen.Bounds.Height)
Using g1 As Graphics = Graphics.FromImage(BMP2)
g1.CopyFromScreen(0, 0, 0, 0, BMP2.Size)
Cursor.Draw(g1, New Rectangle(Cursor.Position.X, Cursor.Position.Y, Cursor.Size.Width, Cursor.Size.Height))
Using MS As New MemoryStream
BMP2.Save(MS, System.Drawing.Imaging.ImageFormat.Bmp)
Bmp2Bytes.AddRange(MS.ToArray)
End Using
End Using
End Using
' Now I have the original images bytes in Bmp1Bytes and the new images bytes in Bmp2Bytes on the UDP Client. But I don't
' want to send all of the bytes in Bmp2Bytes to the UDP Server. Just the indexes of and the bytes that are different in
' Bmp2Bytes from Bmp1Bytes.
' This takes less than 100 milliseconds for what I've tested so far where over 500000 bytes in Bmp2Bytes are different
' than the bytes in Bmp1Bytes. Usually that amount would be much less. But during testing I was displaying the image
' from Bmp1 bytes in a PictureBox so a large amount of data would change between the first screen shot, the PictureBox
' then displaying an image on the same PC and then the second screen shot.
BmpComparisonDict.Clear()
For i = 0 To Bmp1Bytes.Count - 1
If Bmp1Bytes(i) <> Bmp2Bytes(i) Then
BmpComparisonDict.Add(i, Bmp2Bytes(i))
End If
Next
' So now I have all the difference bytes and their indexes from Bmp2Bytes in the BmpComparisonDict. So I compress
' the indexes into on List and the Bytes into another List.
BmpDifferenceIndexesCompressed.Clear()
BmpDifferenceBytesCompressed.Clear()
BmpDifferenceIndexesCompressed.AddRange(Compress(BmpComparisonDict.Keys.SelectMany(Function(d) BitConverter.GetBytes(d)).ToArray()))
BmpDifferenceBytesCompressed.AddRange(Compress(BmpComparisonDict.Values.ToArray))
' Now pretend the UDP Client has sent both those arrays to the UDP Server which has added both decompressed arrays
' to a Dictionary(Of Integer, Byte). And the server has the original image decompressed bytes received in a List
' called Bmp1Bytes also.
' This is where I am stuck. The UDP Server has the Dictionary. That part was fast. However there is no
' fast method I have found for creating a new List(Of Byte) where bytes in the originally received List(Of Byte) that
' do not have to be altered are placed into a new List(Of Byte) except for the indexes listed in the
' Dictionary(Of Integer, Byte) that need to be placed into the appropriate index locations of the new List(Of Byte).
' The below example for doing so is exceptionally slow. Pretend UpdateDictionary has all of the decompressed indexes
' and bytes received by the UDP Server for the update contained within it.
Dim UpdateDictionary As New Dictionary(Of Integer, Byte)
Dim UpdatedBytes As New List(Of Byte)
Dim Counter As Integer = 0
For i = 0 To Bmp1Bytes.Count - 1
If i = UpdateDictionary.Keys(Counter) Then ' Provides the index contained in the Keys for the Dictionary
UpdatedBytes.Add(UpdateDictionary.Values(Counter))
Counter += 1
If Counter > UpdateDictionary.Count - 1 Then Counter = 0
Else
UpdatedBytes.Add(Bmp1Bytes(i))
End If
Next
' So what I'm trying to do is find an extremely fast method for performing something similar to what the
' above operation performs.
End Sub
Private Function Compress(BytesToCompress() As Byte) As List(Of Byte)
Dim BytesCompressed As New List(Of Byte)
Using compressedStream = New MemoryStream()
Using zipStream = New GZipStream(compressedStream, CompressionMode.Compress)
zipStream.Write(BytesToCompress, 0, BytesToCompress.Count)
zipStream.Close()
BytesCompressed.AddRange(compressedStream.ToArray)
End Using
End Using
Return BytesCompressed
End Function
Private Function Decompress(BytesToDecompress() As Byte) As List(Of Byte)
Dim BytesDecompressed As New List(Of Byte)
Using DecompressedStream = New MemoryStream()
Using zipStream = New GZipStream(DecompressedStream, CompressionMode.Decompress)
zipStream.Write(BytesToDecompress, 0, BytesToDecompress.Count)
zipStream.Close()
BytesDecompressed.AddRange(DecompressedStream.ToArray)
End Using
End Using
Return BytesDecompressed
End Function
End Class
La vida loca

How can I make rectangular speech bubbles that adapt to the text inside them without the "arrow" that points towards where the bubble is coming from getting changed?

I have to make lots of speech bubbles (150+) that all have texts inside them which differ in length. I want the speech bubbles to look the same in terms of style, but I need different sizes of course for each text. This means that the rectangular part of the speech bubble should adapt in length and width to the text inside it, while the "arrow" pointing towards where the bubble is coming from (e.g. the person who speaks) should stay the same on every bubble. So is there a way or a workaround to make such "adapting" speech bubbles?
I appreciate any kinds of help
Thanks in advance!

Here's another way I found:
1. Draw a speech bubble. Mine is a rectangle with rounded corners and a triangular pointer added with Pathfinder > Add
2. Drag out a frame the same size as the speech bubble. Select the speech bubble and Copy; then select the empty frame and choose Edit > Paste Into...
3. Alt-Drag the frame with the pasted speech bubble to make a copy, then crop one copy to leave only the top of the bubble showing, and crop the other copy to leave only the bottom.
4. Drag out a text frame and insert a table consisting of 1 column, 3 rows. Set the text frame to Autosize > Height Only.
5. Set the stroke/fill of the top and bottom rows to none, and style the middle row to match the speech bubble, (in my case a white fill and 2pt stroke; left and right).
6. Anchor (paste) a copy of the speech bubble top in the top table row, and a copy of the speech bubble bottom in the bottom row.
Getting the 3 parts to match up with is where you just have to work on it until you get it right. Use the positioning tools in Anchored Object options and the column width setting in Cell options to line everything up.
Enter your text in the middle row. (Hey, look at that...a valid application of Comic Sans!) With the Cell Height set to an "At Least" setting, the cell will expand to fit whatever text you enter, pushing the the bottom row down, with the text frame auto-sizing to keep everything in play...

Dynamically setting column width doesn't work all the time

I wanted to dynamically set the width of a column in a JTable to be half of the width of a another column. This should happen whenever the frame is resized. But somehow I need to tell this twice to Java. If I don't then sometimes the column width isn't set new.
Is this a Java bug or what?
public void componentResized(ComponentEvent ce)
     try
          ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(5)).setMaxWidth(ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(1)).getWidth() / 2);
          ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(5)).setMinWidth(ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(1)).getWidth() / 2);
          // Again, or it won't work:
          ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(5)).setMaxWidth(ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(1)).getWidth() / 2);
          ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(5)).setMinWidth(ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(1)).getWidth() / 2);
     catch(SQLException e)
}

Is it possible that your call to
ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(5)).setMinWidth(ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(1)).getWidth() / 2);
is altering the response created by
ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(5)).setMaxWidth(ref.table.getColumn(ref.rsmd.getColumnLabel(1)).getWidth() / 2);
? Have you tried calling them once but in the other order? Or just calling the "setMaxWidth" call twice and leaving out the second "setMinWidth"?
Good luck... :)

Allow the user to control the width of the edit forum post input box

I would like to control the width of of the edit-forum post input box. This could be:
automatically adjust the width of the box so that the box doesn't run off the right edge of the window.
have a user global preference to set the preferred width
at least, allow the user to change the width via the change size icon. The three horizontal bars at the lower left of the input box. You can adjust the vertical dimension, but not the horizontal. TenFourFox 4.0.1. This is probably being blocked for some obscure reason.
Here is an example of an over extended right margin:
Curiously enough, the "software" let's me adjust the width & height of the add reason to edit text, but not adjust the width of the more important edit text box.
Robert

Testing
Standard Reply box can be height adjusted but not width.
Same with Advanced Editor
No Adjustment at all in HTL Editor
Edit.
The Edit uses the Advanced Editor
Only Height Adjustment again.
I do seem to remember someone posting about the width and saying they could drag it over the edge of the right hand edge (Into the grey surround)
This may have been a post in the lounge.
It didn't actually try it at the time but have played with it since and have not seen it.
Maybe it is something they "Fixed" in both senses of the word.
Second edit.
I can't alter the box that currently reads "Message Edited by:- ..."
I also can't get this box to accept New lines (they appear in the box but don't post that way)
Corrected Spelling
9:51 PM Wednesday; May 11, 2011
Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"
 G4/1GhzDual MDD (Leopard 10.5.8)
 MacBookPro 2Gb( 10.6.7)
 Mac OS X (10.6.7),
"Limit the Logs to the Bits above Binary Images."  No, Seriously
Message was edited by: Ralph Johns (UK)
Message was edited by: Ralph Johns (UK)
and new line with a line space as well

Captivate 8 vs yosemite. Audio speech doesn't work neither on Captivate 7 nor Captivate 8. Is there any bug to fix this problem?

I'm having problems when using Captivate 7 and 8 - specially audio speech management.
As I use OSX Yosemite, I don't know why but it doesn't work properly.
Any bug or way to fix this problem?
Thanks in advance.

Captivate for yosemite is all around really buggy. I also cant get text to speech to work, but I am experiencing issues with what I call "windowing". When I attempted to maximize captivate 8 to my cinema display, menus and modal windows spawned by captivate often appear behind other windows. In addition, Captivate can't seem to figure out how to maximize to the available screen real estate.
These two things happen to be the most annoying bugs, but I have experienced many more:
1.Timeline is really wonky. I can't select multiple timeline items and move them without the timeline completely falling apart.
2. Selecting objects that are overlapping on the stage is terrrible
3. Altering the duration that an item should appear in the timeline often creates an extremely annoying bug where other timeline items will jump to an arbitrary spot. This creates a ton of re-work.
Adobe - Cap 8 is not ready for use in OSX Yosemite- please fix it!

Envelope widths and centering

Hello, hoping someone has run into this issue before... I have an image of whats going on and can post more visuals if needed.
I have an automated situation where text in an envelope gets changed out depending on a list of names.
I modified my original font file to have some extra info so it doesn't drastically change when in the envelope with descender characters (g, j, y, cursive z, etc)
that worked well for me and allows longer names without too much altering by the envelope box.
My issue now is short names try to fill the ENTIRE envelope... which I get that its just how envelopes work
The problem is shorter names look 'ugly' at this size and only good for names with 4 letters or more
Is there any work around to this? like say scaling the 'width' of the envelope based on the name being 3 characters or less (Names like Sue, Joy, Ma)
It currently ignores any white-space/spacing unless it has a character...
Example 1: ' Ma ' = Ma
Example 2: '. Ma .' = . Ma .
I tried some clipping mask magic to no real scalable solution... only thing I can think is that the actual envelope shape needs to scale horizontally.
But I was getting some slight vertical shifting as well... If I leave out an envelope short names look fine but longer ones simply go wider than the art board/intended output size
So I'm thinking I need an envelope and it needs to handle both long/short names/words
Hoping someone has some options, tips to try out.
I am more than happy to elaborate in my workflow just didn't want too much up front.
Thank you!! I appreciate you taking the time to read/any help you may offer my way
-Ryan

Oh wow!
Never thought to add more layers into the envelope, just tried on my end in CC
Thank you very much! Fast reply even!!

Horizontal Menu Bar Width Issues

Hey all,
I'm having some problems getting my menu bar to stretch all the way across the 1000px container it's in. Is there a way to alter the width of individual tabs? It is set to float left, and the width is currently set at auto under ul.MenuBarHorizontal li. I've put a screen shot in for reference. Thanks for any help in advance.
As you can see below, the last tab (gifts) is not quite reaching the edge of the container.

You can change the padding in the following
ul.MenuBarHorizontal a {
    display: block;
    cursor: pointer;
    background-color: #EEE;
    padding: 0.5em 0.75em;
    color: #333;
    text-decoration: none;
Gramps

Changing the pulse width of a counter on-the-fly - ?

I'm seeing strange behavior when trying to change the pulse width of a
counter while it is running continuously. Using the property node
I can set the DAQmx Channel Properties "Low
Time" and "High Time" when the values are
changed by the user (see attached VI). The first change is
ignored initially, but then applied when a second change is made, i.e.
the changes are applied one step late. If I read the respective
properties the values are what is set but not what is being
generated and seen on an o-scope. I added a
condition of watching the property "Ready For New Value" before applying the
change, but that doesn't alter the behavior. What am I missing?
Windows XP
LabVIEW 7.1
DAQmx 7.4.0f0
PCI-6251
Thanks,
DTL
Attachments:
GenDigPulseTrain-ChangingSpecs II.vi ‏104 KB

Alan,
Thanks for the reply. I don't know if I explained in well in my
previous post, but I'll try to confuse again: The issue is that the
property node change is reflected on the hardware (pulse output) one
change delayed. Example: Start the VI with time value A.
The user sets the time to value B, the property node read for the time
will read value B, but the output pulse (hardware) stays at value
A. Then the user sets the time to value C, the property node read
is C, but the output is now B, and so on...
I've worked with the DAQmx Write, as the example you pointed to shows,
and it will work properly (reflect the change immediately on the
hardware). If one replaces the DAQmx Write to a Channel Property
Node it will start working as I described above (change reflected one
change delayed). Note: A subtle additional change is that I have
changed everything to Time (High, Low) instead of Frequency (Duty
Cycle, Frequency) - ?. Note 2: DAQmx Write doesn't bring
out all the properties - what if I have to use a property node?
Do I need to "double pump" the values?
FWIW,
Don

Width of Speech Bubles Altered

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for