WiFi slower in Windows XP!

This is really strange.
I have a wireless Intel 3945ABG card with the latest drivers installed on my laptop and a WRT54G Linksys Ver. 6 router with the latest firmware installed. When I test the speeds in Windows XP they are as twice as low as they should be. For example my connection is 6Mbps and when I test it it says 3Mbps. In Windows Vista the speeds are completely different. The download and upload speeds are as they should be - 6Mbps.
Any feedback is appreciated!
Thank you in advance!

Hi……
Well is your windows vista a wireless Pc or is it hardwired to the router?
Now if the vista Pc is hardwired to the router then, first log into the setup page of the router with http://192.168.1.1 username leave blank and the password is admin. And under the wireless tab under the advanced wireless setting lower the Beacon Interval to 50, Fragmentation Threshold to 2306 and the RTS Threshold to 2307.
And if the windows vista is a wireless pc then that’s an issue with the wireless card in the laptop. Also one thing you can try is connect your laptop to the router with the Ethernet cord and then test the speed again for the windows XP computer.

Similar Messages

Why is my wifi slow on Windows 7 and not Mountain Lion?

I have Windows 7 installed through boot camp. I purchased my MacBook Pro new 2012. When I use wifi in Mountain Lion, it works great. When I boot into Windows 7 I get SUPER slow speeds. OSX I get full speed at 60 Mb/s. Windows I get 1 Mb/s or lower. I updated OSX, and windows 7. I have an Samsung SSD 840 Pro and everything is running incredibly fast. I just need the wifi fixed. I also purchased an Airport Extreme about 2 months ago, latest version. Airport Utility is also up to date. Please help!

Try a different cable. And are you connecting directly to your computer or through a USB hub?

Slow wifi connection with windows 8

Hi! I have a problem with wifi drivers for windows 8 on my MacBook Air. The OS works great but wifi is too slow. I've read that could be a bug with latest driver versions, can you tell me where I can find older versions? Or there's another solution that I don't know?
I tried to search for answers on this community but I can't find anything.
Thanks,
Luca

I just found solution for my problem It seems that there is compatibility problem between Cisco 120N wireless router and new iPad 3'rd generation. The problem is occurs in WiFi "N" mode only. Once I switched the Cisco 120N wireless router to the "BG-mixed" mode than the WiFi transfer on my iPad is as good as on other devices. And when I switched my Cisco 120N to "Wireless-N Only" than the problems with WiFi transfer were unbearable, which clearly points out the incompatibilities to the N-mode only.
I begin to wonder though whether are there any wireless routers that would properly work with new iPad in "N" mode? Could you please let me know with which Cisco/Linksys/Netgear/D-Link/TP-link wireless routers iPad 3 works well in N mode?

WiFi slow when running Windows 7 on Mac Mini (2011)

Hi,
I have just bought a Mac Mini (2011) and used Boot Camp for installing Windows 7 as well. However I am experiencing some problems with the WiFi when running Windows. The speed is less than 10% of what it should be. I have tried connecting a network cable and then everything is running fine. When booting into OS X Lion there are no problems with running WiFi. I have tried to rightclick on the network adapter and select update drivers but it says that the driver installed is up to date.
Any ideas?

Apparently it was a router issue. When I connected my old Cisco router as an extended access point both the Mac OS and Windows session connected as supposed to. I made a factory reset of the router provided by my ISP, configured it again and the problem apparently seemed to be solved.
However overnight the problem occured again - I swithed the router off and on again and was able to connect. I noticed in the DHCP log that when running Mac OS the computername "My-Mac-Mini" is sent to the router with the MAC address of the network card - when running Windows it is the machine name I entered during the Windows installation. Not sure if that is confusing the router from my ISP but after I changed the computername in Mac OS the connection seems stable.

I have an Epson printer on a Wifi network. Windows 7 desktop and and HP Win 7 laptop (my wifes) print to it just fine. My MacBook Pro running Yosemite won't detect it, and I have the latest driver installed. No problem when I had a Canon...

I have an Epson printer on a Wifi network. Windows 7 desktop is running the network, and my wife's HP Win 7 laptop prints to it just fine. My MacBook Pro running Yosemite won't detect it, and I do have the latest driver installed. I didn't have a problem when I had a Canon Pixma on the network, but when I replaced it with the Epson nothing seems to work. I go to add a printer to the queue and only the FAX function of the printer shows up - not the WS-4530 print function. Does anyone out there have any suggestions? Please??? :-)

Hi Kelly,
As someone who has to print from my Mac to a networked printer at home all the time, I can certainly understand how frustrating it must be to have that fail to perform as expected. Let's see if we can get you up and running.
I would suggest that you troubleshoot using the steps in this article -
OS X Yosemite: Printing troubleshooting
Start with the section titled Check the network.
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
Sincerely,
Brett L

Access 2007 very slow on Windows 7

Access 2007 is running very slowly in on two new Windows 7 clients. By slow, I mean the response time within Access - moving from screen to screen is dreadfully slow, taking 30+ seconds on Windows 7 to do what a computer with Windows XP will do in
1 second.
I cannot find any information that addresses the issue.
We have been running Windows XP SP3 clients successfully for almost a year. The speed is virtually instantaneous. The Access file is hosted on a file server, Windows Server 2003, with SQL Server Express 2008. Nothing has changed on the
server. The Windows XP clients previously and currently experience no problems.
The first of 2 new computers were deployed with Windows 7, with OS pre-loaded from Dell. Microsoft update was run to update OS and Access. Once discovered that Access was running brutally slow, I used the other new PC to test. Windows 7
freshly installed. Office 2007 freshly installed. Tested - still slow. Ran Windows Update, then re-tested. Still slow.
The issue reminds me of the slowness experienced when we were developing the Access database on my laptop which was running Vista. So, it runs fine on XP, but not on Vista or 7.
I'm convinced the problem is a conflict with Windows 7 on the client, but cannot pinpoint it. I've searched these forums and Google for answers, but have not found any information that has specifically addressed this issue. Can anyone offer assistance?

After reading numerous forums , I was able to resolve
the following issues (Screens Freezing, Screens Lag/Flickers, combo/list boxes freezing whilst searching for data) by carrying out the following:
Creating a brand new copy of the MS Access database in MS Access 2007/2010 using the Windows 7 image
Importing the database objects (tables queries, forms, reports, macros and modules) into MS Access 2007 /2010 d/b within the Windows 7 image.
Setting the
MaxBufferSize of 16384 (Decimal), HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE (regedit) onto various PCs as recommended by various forums.
Making sure that the relevant reference libraries have been selected for MS Access 2007. This should automatically set throughout the default
installation as demonstrated below:
Visual Basic For Applications
Microsoft Access 12.0 Object Library
OLE Automation
Microsoft DAO 3.6 Object Library
Microsoft ActiveX Data Objects 2.5 Library
Also by typing in the following words into Google, provided me with some solutions, however the instructions above allowed me to rectify the issues
experienced above.
MS Access 2007 slow in Windows 7
MS Access 2007 and Windows 7 issues
MS Access 2007 freezes
Performance slow with MS Access and Linked Tables
Slow performance windows 7 using MS Access

HP Notebook - 15-ac043tu - NOT ABLE TO INSTALL WIFI DRIVERS FOR WINDOWS 7 -64 BIT

I baught HP Notebook - 15-ac043tu. I am not able to install wifi drivers in windows 7 home edition . I have downloaded all drivers from HP Link shown below, http://support.hp.com/in-en/drivers/selfservice/hp-15-ac000-notebook-pc-series/7771404/model/8326116#Z7_3054ICK0K8UDA0AQC11TA930C7 Can anyone help me ?

Hi I am facing a similar issue,Last week I bought my friend this Hp Notebook 15 (15-ac043TU) with DOS, I installed Win8 (64bit) and tried installing drivers from 'http://support.hp.com/, but its not accepting the WLAN drivers, I tried many, available for this model for win7 as well as for win8.1, wondering there was no win8 option, however it should work for Win8, I also followed your suggest but got the same error - "Update.cpp 1205" If you need Hardware Id, on 'Network Controller' - properties in devices manager, it is -PCI\VEN_14E4&DEV_4365&SUBSYS_804A103C&REV_01 Thank you and Regards:Gagan

How can I get a better driver for my 1394b Hostcontroller in my Macbook pro 2010 to solve the problem, that it is too slow under Windows 7 installed with bootcamp ?

How can I get a better driver for my 1394b Hostcontroller in my Macbook pro 2010 to solve the problem, that it is too slow under Windows 7 installed with bootcamp ?
WIndows can't find a better one than the installed LSI Conformed 1394 Hostcontroller

Read and follow the Bootcamp Installation instructions that you were offered to view when you ran Bootcamp Assistant.
Run Bootcamp Assistant again and select the option to download the Bootcamp Support software. Follow the instructions. Then boot into Windows and install the Windows Support software you downloaded and saved.

Mac OS internet 5x slower than Windows 7 on BootCamp

Alright, here is my problem...
My one and only computer is a mid 2010 iMac... I recently moved to a new place. Prior to me moving I was stuck with an awful 3Mbps download speed. (You can tell how much I hated it by looking at my username) Now that I moved, I am able to get much faster internet. So, I got a plan that offers up to 50Mbps download speeds (Xfinity Blast cable internet). I didn't want to rent my ISP's modem/router, so I purchased my own. I got a Motorola sbg6580. As soon as I got everything hooked up, it seemed perfect. I used speedtest.net to see what I was getting. I first tested on Windows 7. To my surprise, I was getting around 70Mbps. I then restarted my iMac into the Mac OS to do some speed tests. On the Mac OS, I was getting around 50-60Mbps. A bit slower than Windows 7, but still very good. The next day I decided to do a "real world" test. I downloaded a 1 Gigabyte file just to see how fast it was. Now, if I was getting 50Mbps the file should have taken just under 3 minutes to download. Instead, it took around 7 minutes. I figured it was maybe just the website I was downloading from. (the file I was downloading was the Cry Enginge SDK - http://www.crydev.net/ ) I did some research and discovered the website testmy.net - I am not sure if this is completely reliable or not, but every test I do on testmy.net I get around 10Mbps. At first I thought it was my ISP ripping me off, then I decided to do a testmy.net test on Windows 7 via BootCamp. (please note that on both Mac OSX and Windows 7 I did multiple tests over the coarse of multiple days) On Windows, I could instantly tell that the test was going much faster. The results for testmy.net on Windows 7 were 50-60Mbps. I did not completely trust the website, so I downloaded the same Cryengine SDK on Windows. It took around 3 minutes, just as it should have. I researched a bunch online trying to find info on this problem. I tried many "solutions" but none of them changed anything. (these include but are not limited to: Tried different DNS servers, Disabled ipv6, disabled sbg6580 firewall, disabled mac osx firewall, tried changing the wireless channel, and reset sbg6580. I came to the conclusion that it was the sbg6580. I thought that maybe an airport express would give me better results. So, today I bought an Airport express. With the sbg6580, I was able to disable the router features so it was just a modem. I was then able to set up the Airport express as my router. It fixed nothing. I am still getting the same results, Windows is still getting anywhere from 50-60Mbps while Mac OSX is getting around 10Mbps. I am out of ideas, if anyone could please help me that would be great. Also, if you need to know anything else please let me know. I may have missed something...
A quick note:
At my old house I had my iMac hooked up to a surge protector. For maximum internet performance, my iMac was connected to my router with an ethernet cable. During a bad storm one day, a lightning bolt either hit my house or very close to it. Ever since, my ethernet port has not worked. I have tried multiple eithernet cables as well as multiple routers and networks. I do not have the money for apple to completely replace my logic board. - So anyway, I am unable to test the performace with an eithernet cable.
Extra information:
My sbg6580 as well as my Airport extreme are both sitting on the same desk as my iMac, so it is obviously not a signal problem.
I also own both a iPod touch 5th gen and a iPad 2nd gen. I am getting around 20-30Mbps on both of them. I am not sure what would be a "good speed" on either of these, but I figured that was pretty good for a tablet and ipod.
The upload speeds on both windows 7 and Mac OSX are around the same 5-10Mbps.
I am using Google Chrome on both Windows 7 and Mac OSX but, I have also tried Firefox and Safari.

Please read this whole message before doing anything.
This procedure is a diagnostic test. It’s unlikely to solve your problem. Don’t be disappointed when you find that nothing has changed after you complete it.
The purpose of the test is to determine whether the problem is caused by third-party software that loads automatically at startup or login, or by a peripheral device.
Disconnect all wired peripherals except those needed for the test, and remove all aftermarket expansion cards. Boot in safe mode and log in to the account with the problem. Note: If FileVault is enabled, or if a firmware password is set, or if the boot volume is a software RAID, you can’t do this. Post for further instructions.
Safe mode is much slower to boot and run than normal, and some things won’t work at all, including wireless networking on certain Macs. The next normal boot may also be somewhat slow.
The login screen appears even if you usually log in automatically. You must know your login password in order to log in. If you’ve forgotten the password, you will need to reset it before you begin. Test while in safe mode. Same problem? After testing, reboot as usual (i.e., not in safe mode) and verify that you still have the problem. Post the results of the test.

Problem with Win 7 x64, WWAN or WiFi card and Windows XP Mode

I have a T500 with switchable graphics (2056-4RU) with a clean install of Windows 7 Pro x64 with the AT&T WWAN card.
With all the Win7 RTM drivers and Access Connections for Win7, I had a problem that the WWAN card (Ericson F3507g, purchased from Lenovo and working flawlessly under Vista 32-bit) would not initialize. Support told me to uninstall the Win 7 versions of the Power Manager Drivers, WWAN card driver and Access Connections and replace them with the Vista counterparts, which restored the functionality of my WWAN card. Based on the speed with which the support tech came up with the suggested fix, I suspect I am not the only one with the disappearing WWAN card problem.
Now I have found that starting the Windows XP Mode virtual machine kills the WiFi functionality (Intel WiFi Link 5100 AGN) until I disable and re-enable the WiFi adapter in Device Manager and then restart the system. (I have not problems with XP Mode and with the Win7 drivers / Access Connections opening Windows XP Mode did not cause the problem with the WiFi.) Opening Windows XP Mode causes no problem with the wired network adapter on my system).
Thus it appears that I can have functionality of the WWAN and WiFi adapters with XP Mode using the Released Win 7 versions and functionality of Windows XP Mode together OR I can have WWAN but not WiFi functionality with XP Mode using the Vista drivers that support suggested. However, it seems that I cannot have WWAN, WiFi and XP Mode concurrently.
I reproduced the above XP mode / WWAN problem / WiFi problems on a T500 with Win7 x64 owned by another family member.
Does anyone (particularly anyone from Lenovo) have fix for this?
Thanks.

for the sim card, try this:
http://jack.ukleja.com/update-ericsson-f3507g-mobile-broadband-on-windows-7-with-lenovo-thinkpad/com...
I have another operator and I finally gave up. apparently it's also no that easy to install the SIM card, if the plastic thing that helps to remove the SIM card is not the right position, it will overlap the SIM Card chip.
can't help for the WIFI. I had the problems too with access connection and decided to remove it. I use Seven's network manager, which does an equally good job.
Since I have the switch to turn off the wireless, I don't really need access connection anyway.
Finally, something that I learns while struggling with the bluetooth driver: the order in which power manager, access connection and the different drivers are installed DOES affect their effectiveness. I forgot the details but I remember 2 things:
always read the TXT file that is available on the driver page on the lenovo web site and install power manager and access connection last.
Good luck

Is ORACLE slower on Windows then on Linux ?

Hi,
I'm suppose to choose the platform for Oracle .... Linux or Windows 2008 Server ...
Ones we've installed Oracle on Windows 2003 Server and it was really slower like 200-300% ..... we did simple default install
Does anyone know if this is a fact that Oracle will run slower on Windows platform then on any other ? Any experiance with that ? If we are talking about 5-10% then this is ok and I'll stick with windows ...
Cause I know how to deal with windows much more then how to deal with Linux admin, install and other stuff ...
Thank you...
Kris

burleson wrote:
Hi Charles,
Installing a virus scanner on the server, especially if it is permitted to scan program and data files used by Oracle.Ha, that a good one! That the FIRST thing I check!
Also, I've seen high demand screensavers (fractals) clobber Oracle performance . . .
Oracle on Windows uses a thread modelThat's actually one of the few "positives" about running Oracle on Windows . . .
rather than providing a performance comparison between Linux and Windows.Fine, try here:
www.dba-oracle.com/oracle_tips_linux_oracle.htm
"Roby Sherman performed an exhaustive study of the speed of Oracle on Linux and Microsoft Windows using identical hardware. Sherman currently works for Qwest Communications in the data technologies group of IT architecture and transversal services. He is a recognized expert in designing, delivering, tuning, and troubleshooting n-tier systems and technology architecture components of various size and complexity based on Oracle RDBMS technology.
Sherman concludes that Linux was over 30% faster:
"From perspective of performance, RedHat Linux 7.2 demonstrated an average performance advantage of 38.4 percent higher RDBMS throughput than a similarly configured Windows 2000 Server in a variety of operational scenarios." Sherman also notes: "Another point of contention was Window's lack of consistency between many database administrative functions (e.g., automated startup, shutdown, service creation, scripting) compared to what DBAs are already used to in many mainstream UNIX environments (e.g., Solaris and HP-UX)."
Mr. Burleson's comments seem to be out of line. No, I'm right on the money.
*I've seen enough companies get burned by Windows (unplanned outages, data corruption) to speak with confidence.*
Bottom line, it's malfeasence to recommend any OS platform for a production database application that has an unsavory history.
It does not take a genius to figure out that an OS with this kind of history should not be used with any data that you care about:
- "blue screen of death"
- legandary security vulnerabilities
- memory leaks you could drive a truck through
- Patching weekly
- The world's most incompetant tech support
I'm not alone in this opinion:
thetendjee.wordpress.com/2007/01/22/oracle-10202-sucks-on-windows/
www.google.com/search?&q=%22windows+sucksMr. Burleson,
Good point on the screen saver.
Comparing Windows 2000, released in March 2000, with Red Hat 7.2 which was released in ... sorry, forgot the date, but I put in a couple servers running that release of Linux into service in 2001. I was kind of hoping that you would have an article which pits Windows 3.1 against the original Linux release. :-)
You might be happy to know that things have changed significantly since Windows 3.1, and also significantly since Windows 2000. There were many improvements in Windows 2003 over Windows 2000 (I happened to read a couple large books on the subject of Windows 2003 Server a couple years ago). This page contains a couple links that you may want to browse:
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/evaluation/performance/default.mspx
Windows sucks... I have heard that the Microsoft Windows operating system is on barcode scanners, phones, and even car navigation systems. I had no idea that vacuums also utilized Windows, thanks for the heads-up:
http://www.patentstorm.us/patents/6289552/description.html
http://advertising.microsoft.com/BestVacuum
Interesting Google search of the day: define:malfeasence
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Amalfeasence&aq=f&oq=&aqi=
"Did you mean: define:malfeasance
No definitions were found for malfeasence"
define:malfeasance
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Amalfeasance&spell=1
"Definitions of malfeasance on the Web:
•wrongful conduct by a public official
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
•The expressions misfeasance and nonfeasance, and occasionally malfeasance, are used in English law with reference to the discharge of public obligations existing by common law, custom or statute.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malfeasance
•wrongdoing; Misconduct or wrongdoing, especially by a public official that causes damage
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/malfeasance"
define:unsavory
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Aunsavory
"Definitions of unsavory on the Web:
•morally offensive; ‘an unsavory reputation’; ‘an unsavory scandal’
•distasteful: not pleasing in odor or taste
wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
•Disreputable, not respectable, of questionable moral character
en.wiktionary.org/wiki/unsavory"
Regarding blue screen of death, those are rather rare with versions of Windows since the release of Windows 2000. The last blue screen that I saw on a server happened when an ECC memory module started experiencing multiple hardware bit errors which could not be corrected by the ECC memory logic. The server hardware forced the blue screen to prevent data corruption. The previous blue screen? A Windows NT 4.0 Server (circa 1996) when a new RAID controller was added to the server.
Regarding legandary security vulnerabilities, well I don't think that it quite qualifies as legendary. However, given the wide usage of Windows (particularly by people just starting to learn to use computers), there will very definitely be more security issues to contend with - Windows often offers a larger attack surface than other operating systems. Yes, there have been many security problems over the years.
Regarding memory leaks you could drive a truck through, I have to say that in a server environment I have not experienced that problem. On a desktop environment, I would say that it is typically the fault of poorly written applications which cause the memory leaks. Windows will often clean up after the poorly written applications when they are closed.
Regarding patching weekly, yes there are typically frequent security and bug fixes released for the Windows platform, but I suggest that if someone is patching weekly on a server, there is probably a larger problem to be addressed.
Regarding the world's most incompetant tech support, I am not sure that I follow your logic:
define:incompetant
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=define%3Aincompetant
"Did you mean: define:incompetent
No definitions were found for incompetant.
Suggestions:
- Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
- Search the Web for documents that contain 'incompetant'"
As previously stated, consideration should be given to the operating system which is most familiar to the OP.
Charles Hooper
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

PSE 12 running slow in Windows 7?

I have just installed PSE 12 on a Windows 7 platform and it runs very slow and freezes when I try to selct files in organizer. Is there anyhting I can do in settings, etc.?

From: Barbara B.
Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 3:56 PM
To: Mike DMD
Subject: PSE 12 running slow in Windows 7?
      I followed the instructions exactly as in the article.I don’t think there is much scope for error as i did not encounter similarly named files and the described path took me exactly to the file in Program Files. I am certain I have never encountered similar problems with my laptop before. Even if I made a mistake, it would have been so easy to make that I would not recommend anyone else to try that!
      Re: PSE 12 running slow in Windows 7?
      created by Barbara B. in Photoshop Elements - View the full discussion I

Disabling always ontop for wifi pop-up window

I'm not sure this is the correct forum in do this in, but I have a problem with using the Wifi at my university and the multi-desktop feature of OS X Yosemite.
When I log onto my university wifi it comes up with a Safari pop-up window detailing my internet usage. Unfortunately, it doesn't take into account the multi-desktop feature of OS X Yosemite. The window is always on top of all the desktops - it sits in front of my Word document, my pdf document, my general web browsing etc. When I swipe between the desktops it just just comes along and gets in the way.
There are no options on the window other than closing it. Unfortunately, if I close the window, it disables my connection.
Is there a way to disable the 'always on top' nature of this window?

The answer was provided here:How to stop the wifi pop-up window?

Focused slow on Windows 7

Hello,
some of the users of Focused are experiencing lags when typing.
The lag grows as the length of the text increases.
I verified the same behavior on Windows 7 32 bits (Adobe Air 1.5.3.9130)
It is a simple application, working correctly on win xp, vista.
Any idea?
The app:
http://spreadingfunkyness.com/focused/
The code:
http://code.google.com/p/focused/
Thanks in advance.

Hi Wleblanc,
“WebDAV is VERY slow on Windows 7 only. When using WebDAV on Windows 8 or using the web portal (browser), file uploads are very fast.”
Do you mean only the uploading operation in WebDAV of Windows 7 is slow or the whole WebDav performance is slow ?
Please check this service ”Webclient” from the service control .
I noticed that the process of creating a WebDAV connection is a little different in Windows 7 and Windows 8 .Someone indeed informed the information that this service will affect the WebDAV performance.
Here are links for reference:
Using Windows, how do I use WebDAV to upload files to my Oncourse Resources or Drop Box?(Pay attention to the creating process)
https://kb.iu.edu/d/araf
How to speed up webdav in windows 7 solved for me(Pay attention to
Ahmed Osman`s answer)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alfresco-technical-discussion/XF5HTouSnC0
NOTE: This response contains a reference to a third party World Wide Web site. Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. Microsoft does
not control these sites and has not tested any software or information found on these sites.
Best regards

WebDav Very Slow on Windows 7 Pro

Environment:
Hosted SharePoint 2010
Two laptops on a Windows Domain: 1) Windows 7 Pro 32-bit & IE11 and 2) Windows 7 Pro 64-bit & IE11.
Problem:
WebDAV is VERY slow on Windows 7 only. When using WebDAV on Windows 8 or using the web portal (browser), file uploads are very fast. We've performed extensive testing as follows with no success.
Installed or confirmed SP1 was installed
Disabled "Automatic Detect Settings" within Internet Options -> Connections -> LAN Settings.
Forced port 443 within URL upon mapping a drive (ex. <URL>:443)
Logged in using the local administrator's profile
Detached computer from domain and used the local administrator's profile

Hi Wleblanc,
“WebDAV is VERY slow on Windows 7 only. When using WebDAV on Windows 8 or using the web portal (browser), file uploads are very fast.”
Do you mean only the uploading operation in WebDAV of Windows 7 is slow or the whole WebDav performance is slow ?
Please check this service ”Webclient” from the service control .
I noticed that the process of creating a WebDAV connection is a little different in Windows 7 and Windows 8 .Someone indeed informed the information that this service will affect the WebDAV performance.
Here are links for reference:
Using Windows, how do I use WebDAV to upload files to my Oncourse Resources or Drop Box?(Pay attention to the creating process)
https://kb.iu.edu/d/araf
How to speed up webdav in windows 7 solved for me(Pay attention to
Ahmed Osman`s answer)
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alfresco-technical-discussion/XF5HTouSnC0
NOTE: This response contains a reference to a third party World Wide Web site. Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. Microsoft does
not control these sites and has not tested any software or information found on these sites.
Best regards

WiFi slower in Windows XP!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for