Windows XP - Ironport prompt Password authentication

Hi,
I am receiving password popup authentication from Cisco Ironport device, even I closed MS Outlook and other running programs while sync with outlook 2003.
Please help

Hi,
You need to apply a registry fix for this:
https://ironport.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/1314
We did it ourselves and it works a treat.
Thanks
Chris

Similar Messages

  • Problem with Windows 7 802.1x prompted for authentication multiple times

    I have setup a WLAN for users to bring in their own devices (devices are not on the domain).  It is setup for WPA2-Enterprise/AES and it doesn't require certificates.  We authenticate with a Cisco Secure Access Server 5.1.44 (setup with Active Directory).
    I have configure dthe Windows 7 wireless client:
    WPA-Enterprise/AES
    PEAP - removed "Validate server certificate"
    EAPMSCHAPv2 properties disabled "Automatically use my Windows login name and password
    Advanced settings 802.1x - ticked for "user authentication"
    My problem is when I connect to the WLAN, I'm prompted for authentication multiple times (x2).  On the second login prompt everything logs in OK.  No errors are received after the first login attempt.
    Thanks

    This doesn't have anything to do with eap settings?
    Are the current defaults the recommended settings:
    EAP-Identity-Request Timeout (seconds)........... 30
    EAP-Identity-Request Max Retries................. 2
    EAP Key-Index for Dynamic WEP.................... 0
    EAP Max-Login Ignore Identity Response........... enable
    EAP-Request Timeout (seconds).................... 30
    EAP-Request Max Retries.......................... 2
    EAPOL-Key Timeout (milliseconds)................. 1000
    EAPOL-Key Max Retries............................ 2
    EAP-Broadcast Key Interval....................... 3600
    I have seen this multiple times on varying drivers and systems. The first time you login until it is cached.
    Thanks,
    Andrew

  • Windows Security user name/password prompt when trying to remote access personal cloud storage device

    I have 2TB WD Book Live drive setup at home and is working fine, including remote accessing by internet. However using a colleague's computer at the office recently, her computer would always prompt me for Windows Security username and password. I've tried
    keying her admin user name/password and well as the router's admin/admin combinations and still doesn't allow me to access the cloud drive properly. However I have had no problem accessing the same drive remotely using other colleagues computers.
    The exact message prompt as follows: Windows Security. The server 192.168.1.1 is asking for your user name and password. The server reports that it is from index.htm. WARNING: Your user name and password will be sent using basic authentication on
    a connection that isn't secure.
    Please help me understand the problem and its solution. Thank you.

    Hi,
    The IP address 192.168.1.1 is your Router server address, isn't it? I doubt there should some limition in your colleague's system. Please check it. Also you can try to disable security software for test to access your cloud.
    The problem isn't your cloud server Authorization.
    Roger Lu
    TechNet Community Support

  • SharePoint site continues prompting window for Id and Password?

    Hi, recently all users facing issue while opening SharePoint 2010 Sites, sites continues prompting window for Id and Password, even after entering information it’s asking.
    When I login on server and try to open the site, there was also asking prompt.
    And when I added user id’s in Server local administration group then sites are opening and when if I remove user id’s from Server local administration then again starting to ask prompt.
    Domain Controller is running fine.
    Please tell what is the issue?

    Prakash,ensure that the site is added in trusted zone or disable the loop back check.please check the links below that gives you the guidance on how to over come the issue.
    http://expertsharepoint.blogspot.de/2013/10/sharepoint-site-is-prompting.html
    Anil Avula[Partner,MCP,MCSE,MCSA,MCTS,MCITP,MCSM] See Me At: http://expertsharepoint.blogspot.de/

  • Use of active directory userid/password authentication instead of SAP R/3 User/Password for digital signature?

    Dear all,
    I am looking to setup the use of active directory userid/password authentication instead of SAP R/3 User/Password for digital signature. We SSO to the backened ABAP AS via an SAP NW Portal to which SPNEgo kerberos authentication is setup. Today we specify R3 user id/password to digitally approvae a lot release. The idea is to have users maintain one AD password and don't have to remember the R/3 password anymore and also our Security team to avoid password maintenance.
    I know there are 3 options for digital signature and
    System signature with authorization by user ID and password (We use this currently)
    Digital User signature with verification - (We would like to use this with AD userid/password, so the system still ask the users their AD userid/password for the authentication when they try to "sign" a document.)
    User signature without verification
    Do you think there is a way to configure the system in order to ask and check the active directory userid/password instead of SAP R/3 password? Where can I found documentation about it ?
    I have several different versions of AS ABAP starting from NW 7.02 to NW 7.31.
    My active directory is based on Windows 2008.
    Thanks in advance!!
    Dhee

    Actually enabling Kerberos for SSO purposes and enabling Kerberos for digital signatures are two different topics although the latter is because of the former. I'm interested in the topic as well and I'm currently looking at different options. SAP provides a BAdI for the digital signature API which can be used for external authentication but they do not provide the solution to invoke Kerberos authentication based on username and password. SAP provides a semi solution with NWSSO 2.0 SP2 which works only on Windows with classic dynpros meaning SAP GUI for Windows is assumed. The solution is based on an ActiveX component which does the actual Kerberos authentication using the Secure Login Client which is part of the NWSSO suite. Extending that implementation to non-Windows and non-GUI applications would require some sort of web enabled service that could be used to authenticate the user with username and password. In case authentication is successful, a Kerberos token would be returned to SAP which would then be validated. All the required pieces are there since SAP has Kerberos support now in both stacks of the NetWeaver Application Server, some bits are still missing though which leaves customers looking at 3rd party or custom solutions.

  • Logon failure with username/password authentication in WLE 5.1

    Hi,
    I have WLE 5.1 configured and running on a Win2K system. I am able to
    build and run the simpapp sample program. I am also able to build the
    interceptor_cxx sample and run with all interceptors other than the
    security interceptor. What I realised in this case was that the
    PersonQueryClient did not perform any login of a user from which the
    security interceptor could extract user ID information (have I missed
    something? I am a WLE and CORBA newbie) so I modified the ubb config
    file to define SECURITY as USER_AUTH and add the AUTHSVC, modified
    personqueryclientc.cpp to get access to the SecurityLevel2 principal
    authenticator, built the app, created a user with the tpussradd command,
    and ran the app (the AUTHSVC successfully starts).
    The Tobj::AuthType returned by the get_auth_type method of the
    PrincipalAuthenticator is Tobj::TOBJ_APPAUTH as I expect. I call the
    logon method with the parameters (user_name, argv[0], sys_password,
    password, 0) where user_name is the same as the user I created with the
    tpusradd command, argv[0] is personqueryclient (I've tried tpusradd'ing
    the user both with the "-c personqueryclient" argument and without),
    sys_password is the password I specified when tmloadcf was run against
    the modified ubb config file, password is the password I specified when
    I ran tpusradd. The logon always fails returning
    Security::SecAuthFailure. In the ULOGxxxx file the following message is
    displayed:
    181605.NUMBAT!TMSYSEVT.2180: LIBTUX_CAT:1484: WARN: .SysClientSecurity:
    User tbartley on SITE1 authentication failure
    I've tried running in the following manners all with the same result:
    1. With or without the security_cxx interceptor registered
    2. With the user in or not in a group
    3. With the the user created using the "-c personqueryclient" arg to
    tpusradd or not
    If I change the security level down to APP_PW then everything works and
    the security_cxx interceptor sees a client name of personqueryclient and
    a username of personqueryclient. The logon fails if I use a sys_password
    other than the one specified to tmloadcf and succeeds if I use the
    correct password.
    Can anyone tell me what I might be doing wrong in the username/password
    authentication case?
    Here's the code I inserted to personqueryc.cpp to perform the logon:
    // Get SecurityCurrent object
    CORBA::Object_var var_security_current_oref
    = bootstrap.resolve_initial_references("SecurityCurrent");
    SecurityLevel2::Current_var var_security_current_ref =
    SecurityLevel2::Current::_narrow(var_security_current_oref.in());
    // Get the principal authenticator
    SecurityLevel2::PrincipalAuthenticator_var
    var_principal_authenticator_oref =
    var_security_current_ref->principal_authenticator();
    char user_name[100] = "";
    char password[100] = "";
    char sys_password[100] = "";
    // Narrow to a BEA Principal Authenticator
    Tobj::PrincipalAuthenticator_var v_bea_pa =
    Tobj::PrincipalAuthenticator::_narrow(var_principal_authenticator_oref.in());
    // See what level of logon has been turned on
    Tobj::AuthType auth_type = v_bea_pa->get_auth_type();
    cout << "Auth type: ";
    switch (auth_type) {
    case Tobj::TOBJ_APPAUTH: cout << "TOBJ_APPAUTH"; break;
    case Tobj::TOBJ_SYSAUTH: cout << "TOBJ_SYSAUTH"; password[0] = '\0';
    break;
    case Tobj::TOBJ_NOAUTH: cout << "TOBJ_NOAUTH"; break;
    default: cout << "TOBJ_<unknown>"; break;
    cout << endl;
    cout << "Username: ";
    cin >> user_name;
    switch (auth_type) {
    case Tobj::TOBJ_APPAUTH: {
    cout << "User password: ";
    cin >> password;
    // fall through
    case Tobj::TOBJ_SYSAUTH: {
    cout << "App password: "; cin >> sys_password;
    break;
    default: {
    break;
    // now that we've got all the data necessary, logon
    Security::AuthenticationStatus status =
    v_bea_pa->logon(user_name,
    argv[0],
    sys_password,
    password,
    0); // user data
    cout << "Logon result: ";
    switch (status) {
    case Security::SecAuthSuccess: cout << "SecAuthSuccess"; break;
    case Security::SecAuthFailure: cout << "SecAuthFailure"; break;
    case Security::SecAuthContinue: cout << "SecAuthContinue"; break;
    case Security::SecAuthExpired: cout << "SecAuthExpired"; break;
    default: cout << "SecAuth<unknown>"; break;
    cout << endl;
    if (status != Security::SecAuthSuccess) {
    cerr << "Invalid password." << endl;
    exit(1);
    Here are the entries I added to the ubb config file:
    *RESOURCES
    SECURITY USER_AUTH
    AUTHSVC AUTHSVR
    *SERVERS
    AUTHSVR SRVGRP=SYS_GRP SRVID=6 RESTART=Y GRACE=600 MAXGEN=2 CLOPT="-A"
    I do not have the WLE Security Services installed (i.e. the package
    that provides SSL and crypto). Is this required? It's not clear to me
    from the documentation if this is required for username/password based
    authentication or not.
    Thanks for any help,
    Tim Bartley

    Hi Michael
    I am using SSL in my application. So that it asks for the certificate username
    and password while startup. But now i want to mention the username and password
    in weblogic.properties file itself. So that the client need not have to provide
    the username and password everytime. I am using weblogic server 5.1 version.
    How do i do this?
    Hope my question is clear. Please help.
    with regds
    siva
    Michael Young <[email protected]> wrote:
    Hi.
    It's not 100% clear to me what you are asking for. Do you want authentication
    turned off for
    your application? That will certainly turn off prompting for authentication
    information. You
    can set your ACL for your application (in your properties file) to allow
    everyone to execute
    it. Something like:
    weblogic.allow.execute.<myApplication>=everyone
    But maybe you want some kind of silent authentication so that not everyone
    can execute your
    app? I suppose you could pass authentication info in a cookie. I really
    don't know enough
    about your application, though.
    I suggest you post this question in weblogic.developer.interest.security
    - you have a better
    chance of getting an answer there for security related questions.
    Hope this helps.
    Michael
    siva wrote:
    Hi all,
    I have the following requirements. I have an application which asksfor the authentication
    information like username and password at first. The application isrunning in
    weblogic5.1 server. Is there a way where in weblogic.properties file,i mention
    the username and password so that the application will not ask forin the browser.
    please help. It's urgent.
    with regds
    siva--
    Developer Relations Engineer
    BEA Support

  • Username and Password authentication

    Hi,
    I am new to both JDBC and MSSQL. I've been connecting to msSQL server without providing username and password (DriverManager.getConnection(String url)). I am wondering how to enforce the username and password authentication so that username and password have to be verified before a connection is made. Thanks in advance.

    but where can I get the username & password? I can get
    the connection even with any username & password, why?Hi WeiHang,
    This is regarding the options you have set in the SQL Server. You have to choose from Windows NT authentication and SQL Server Authentication. If you give SQL Server authentication you have mentioned the username and password and you can connect to database simple using DSN(if you are using JDBC-ODBC). However if you choose WindowsNT authentication you donot specify the user name and password there and you have to enter the same at runtime.
    Hope this can help you

  • "Use my Microsoft Windows user ID and password" is grayed out

    Hello Experts,
    I've disabled "SOX Auditing" option in Server Manager in BPC 5.1 SP03, but "Use my Microsoft Windows user ID and password" is still grayed out. The only option I unlocked is saving password.
    How do I enable Windows Authentication in BPC?
    Thanks in advance,
    Akim

    Enabling/Disabling SOX Compliance does not take effect until the 2nd time you go through the Connection Wizard.
    Your problem could also be within Internet Explorer.
    Go to:
    1.  Internet Explorer>Tools>Internet Options>Security Tab
    2.  Click on Local Intranet zone>Custom Level
    3.  Scroll down to User Authentication>Logon.  Ensure that Automatic Logon with Current UN and PW is checked.
    4.  Do the same for the Internet zone.
    Try on multiple machines.
    Also on the client machine, look at the value for BASICAUTHENTICATION in:
    hkeycurrentuser>software>vb and vba program settings>outlooksoft 5>latest

  • Anybody done USERID/PASSWORD authentication against aWindows NT Domain

    I think I'll have to write a C++ Program to the WinNT API to do it
    (LogonUser). Then I'll wrap it with a service object for authentication. Has
    it been done before? Or something similar? We want to validate users against
    a WindowsNT Server DOMAIN.
    -martin ([email protected])

    Hi Martin & All,
    Yes you are right, wrap the API in C++/C then write a PEX file for interface to Fort&eacute; and use the method to invoke the WinNT API authentication. Do not forget to validate the return values from the methods. They are very crucial in handling exceptions etc., in forte.
    I've done the same to provide the mail user authentication in MAPI API wrapper for Fort&eacute;.
    Is this what you looking for????
    Regards,
    Sivaram S Ghorakavi mailto:[email protected]
    International Business Corporation http://www.ibcweb.com/
    From: Martin G Nystrom
    Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 1997 1:53 PM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: Anybody done USERID/PASSWORD authentication against a Windows NTDomain?
    I think I'll have to write a C++ Program to the WinNT API to do it
    (LogonUser). Then I'll wrap it with a service object for authentication. Has
    it been done before? Or something similar? We want to validate users against
    a WindowsNT Server DOMAIN.
    -martin ([email protected])

  • Provide second level logon / password authentication in Portal.

    I would like to customize our portal using second level logon/password authentication for few of the pages/iviews.
    We have Single Sign on provided to portal so, user is not going to get logon page initially, once he gets into ESS Module where he has to see his /her personal information for which we are planing to ask user to enter his / her password or logout him if that is incorrect.
    please let me know if any one know if there is any inbuilt functionality already available in Portal.
    I am planing to write a Portal Compnent Project using Jspdynpage/PAR project.
    Thanks a lot.

    If you are using windows integrated authentication then what is the purpose of using logoff link.  You can hide it.
    The purpose of windows authentication is to directly logon with out furthur authentication.
    Eventhough you click logoff it will redirect again into the portal.
    If you still want to show logoff link then modify the masthead par file , so that when you click on the logoff button the browser will close. This you can do in Headeriview.jsp
    Otherwise you can redirect to the some other page after clickin the logoff link. Search in SDN for that.
    Raghu

  • Trouble sending email with password authentication in 10.5.6

    I just replaced two macs running 10.4.11 with two running 10.5.6. I am now unable to send email through an SMTP server that requires password authentication. I am able to send email if I switch to a server not requiring authentication, but the authenticating server is preferred.
    I migrated both systems using Migration Assistant, so hopefully that copied everything correctly, but I have subsequently retyped the name and password several times to be sure.
    If I setup a 10.4.11 machine beside its 10.5.6 inheritor, the mail preferences look identical to me (modulo changes in layout between the two versions). If I use Connection Doctor, the 10.4.11 machine quickly gives the server a green light while the 10.5.6 machine spins for a while and finally assigns a red light.
    What am I missing?

    Here is my output -- I have removed personal info
    CONNECTED Mar 26 14:00:20.859 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x1b918cd0 -- thread:0x1bc96d20
    READ Mar 26 14:00:20.877 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x1b918cd0 -- thread:0x1bc96d20
    220 removed.removed.com ESMTP Service (The Blue Window 8.0.022) ready
    WROTE Mar 26 14:00:21.125 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bc63a10 -- thread:0x17700350
    EHLO [IP address removed]
    READ Mar 26 14:00:21.247 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bc63a10 -- thread:0x17700350
    250-swh1.sellwebhost.com Hello [IP address removed] [IP address removed]
    250-SIZE 52428800
    250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN
    250 XXXA
    WROTE Mar 26 14:00:21.293 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bc63a10 -- thread:0x17700350
    READ Mar 26 14:00:21.412 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bc63a10 -- thread:0x17700350
    235 Authentication succeeded
    WROTE Mar 26 14:00:21.458 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bc63a10 -- thread:0x17700350
    QUIT
    WROTE Mar 26 14:00:25.897 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x1b918cd0 -- thread:0x1bc96d20
    EHLO [IP address removed]
    READ Mar 26 14:00:25.918 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x1b918cd0 -- thread:0x1bc96d20
    250-removed.removed.com
    250-8BITMIME
    250-PIPELINING
    250-HELP
    250-AUTH=LOGIN
    250-AUTH CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 LOGIN
    250 SIZE 26214400
    WROTE Mar 26 14:00:25.940 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x1b918cd0 -- thread:0x1bc96d20
    AUTH LOGIN
    READ Mar 26 14:00:25.966 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x1b918cd0 -- thread:0x1bc96d20
    334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
    WROTE Mar 26 14:00:25.989 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x1b918cd0 -- thread:0x1bc96d20
    a2FyaW0uYWxp
    READ Mar 26 14:00:26.012 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x1b918cd0 -- thread:0x1bc96d20
    334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6
    WROTE Mar 26 14:00:26.044 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x1b918cd0 -- thread:0x1bc96d20
    READ Mar 26 14:00:26.481 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x1b918cd0 -- thread:0x1bc96d20
    235 LOGIN authentication successful
    WROTE Mar 26 14:00:26.508 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x1b918cd0 -- thread:0x1bc96d20
    QUIT
    CONNECTED Mar 26 14:00:52.900 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bcecfb0 -- thread:0x1bc4d330
    READ Mar 26 14:00:53.116 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bcecfb0 -- thread:0x1bc4d330
    220-**********************************************************************
    220-*******************************************************************
    220 *****************
    CONNECTED Mar 26 14:00:57.733 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x179edaf0 -- thread:0x179d4150
    READ Mar 26 14:00:57.773 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x179edaf0 -- thread:0x179d4150
    220 removed.removed.com ESMTP Service (The Blue Window 8.0.022) ready
    WROTE Mar 26 14:00:58.169 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bcecfb0 -- thread:0x1bc4d330
    EHLO [IP address removed]
    WROTE Mar 26 14:01:02.802 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x179edaf0 -- thread:0x179d4150
    EHLO [IP address removed]
    READ Mar 26 14:01:02.828 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x179edaf0 -- thread:0x179d4150
    250-removed.removed.ch
    250-8BITMIME
    250-PIPELINING
    250-HELP
    250-AUTH=LOGIN
    250-AUTH CRAM-MD5 DIGEST-MD5 LOGIN
    250 SIZE 26214400
    WROTE Mar 26 14:01:02.852 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x179edaf0 -- thread:0x179d4150
    AUTH LOGIN
    READ Mar 26 14:01:02.875 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x179edaf0 -- thread:0x179d4150
    334 VXNlcm5hbWU6
    WROTE Mar 26 14:01:02.901 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x179edaf0 -- thread:0x179d4150
    a2FyaW0uYWxp
    READ Mar 26 14:01:02.924 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x179edaf0 -- thread:0x179d4150
    334 UGFzc3dvcmQ6
    WROTE Mar 26 14:01:02.948 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x179edaf0 -- thread:0x179d4150
    READ Mar 26 14:01:02.973 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x179edaf0 -- thread:0x179d4150
    235 LOGIN authentication successful
    WROTE Mar 26 14:01:02.996 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:smtpauth.private1.ch -- port:587 -- socket:0x179edaf0 -- thread:0x179d4150
    QUIT
    READ Mar 26 14:01:14.882 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bcecfb0 -- thread:0x1bc4d330
    250-removed.removed.com Hello [IP address removed] [IP address removed]
    250-SIZE 52428800
    250-AUTH PLAIN LOGIN
    250 XXXA
    WROTE Mar 26 14:01:14.934 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bcecfb0 -- thread:0x1bc4d330
    READ Mar 26 14:01:15.049 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bcecfb0 -- thread:0x1bc4d330
    235 Authentication succeeded
    WROTE Mar 26 14:01:15.120 [kCFStreamSocketSecurityLevelNone] -- host:mail.private2.com -- port:25 -- socket:0x1bcecfb0 -- thread:0x1bc4d330
    QUIT

  • Outlook 2010 cannot use Secure Password Authentication

    I am the administrator of the server running Microsoft Windows 2003 Server POP3 service since 2008. It hosts my email account. Nobody but me manages the settings of the server and the client side. Until the moment I decided to install Microsoft Outlook
    2010 as a client there was Secure Password Authentication working between Outlook 2003 and Windows 2003 Server. After installing of Outlook 2010, when I try to sync, the SPA authentication doesn't work. Nothing is changed on the server side.
    Enabling the SPA authentication on the both sides results a communicaton problem between Microsoft Windows 2003 Server POP3 service and Microsoft Outlook 2010 client. When I disable SPA on both sides the connection works but password is sent
    as plain text. Actually I started a discussion on
    http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2010-outlook/outlook-2010-cannot-use-secure-password/66dafd66-1b00-43b5-96fb-b8a26254fc77 but I didn't receive an answer with a solution.

    Snefels,
    This is actually a known issue that Outlook 2010 doesn't work well with Windows Server 2003 POP services.
    Here is the blog post for the issue:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jjameson/archive/2010/04/26/outlook-2010-does-not-work-with-windows-server-2003-pop3-service.aspx
    If you read the comments below, you'll found that some readers' shared some workaround/solutions, which reportedly works for others. So you might want to have a look.
    Disable SPA on the Windows 2003 POP3 server and do the same in Outlook 2010 POP setup.. using the full email address, "[email protected]" instead of just doug (if using the Secure Password Authentication).
    Aravindhan Battepati

  • EUS password authentication in sql developer failing with username/password

    We have recently changed to use Enterprise User Security (EUS) for our client authentication (password global authentication).
    This is working fine but we are encountering an issue with SQL Developer whereby we can't logon using our EUS details, it simply returns the following on the logon screen:
    Status : Failure - Test failed: ORA-01017: invalid username/password; logon denied
    Logging on via sql plus client and server software and other 3rd party tools like pl/sql developer works correctly.
    It appears to be an issue with sql developer itself.
    We are using the latest Production release of sql developer 2.1
    Does anyone have any ideas?
    This is an issue for
    Edited by: david butler on Jan 14, 2010 10:45 AM

    Further to this, I have now found a suitable resolution to this that doesn't require an external client.
    There is a jdbc setting that will allow you to use EUS password authentication.
    Add the jdbc line option (below) in the sqldeveloper.conf file (backup the sqldeveloper.conf file first).
    AddVMOption -Doracle.jdbc.thinLogonCapability=o3
    The sqldeveloper.conf file can be found wherever you have installed sqldeveloper, under <INSTALL_HOME>\sqldeveloper\bin\sqldeveloper.conf.
    After you add this option, restart SQL Developer and you should be able to use your EUS username / password to authenticate via SQL Developer.

  • T61p - Please wait while Windows configures Client Security Password - Manager

    My T61p system is fully updated, however I continue to get "Please with while windows configures Client Security Password - Manager." and then the computer trys to install
    css_manager_vista_tpm.exe
    over and over again.
    What is the problem here and how can I solve?
    How can I contact Lenovo-Thinkpad to assist?
    The problem has reoccured even after I did a system restore to an earlier date.
    It seems to initiate when I first boot up and then open up "Pictures"
    Please help.
    Thanks

    Well, I take everything back. After removing all password entries and re-installing/rebooting, it worked for a while. But now it is doing it all over again. I tried to call techincal support, but they then said I would have to pay for software support and they only support hardware, and to re-install the OS. Great, jeez, I couldn't have tried that myself, and that is so simple and takes no time at all (detecing sarcasm yet?)
    I do a lot of work for large corporations that are watching the IBM=>Lenovo takeover very closely to see if they are going to drop Thinkpads altogether and go with another laptop vendor. This type of weak support does not bode well. The person I was on the phone with was rude, hard to understand, and even told me there was no place to escalate the call to.
    There is no replacement for customer support. It is sad to see no Lenovo involvement in this forum, and don't make the mistake of thinking this is an isolated problem at this time. It is growing.
    Though Thinkpads are great Laptops, Toshiba used to have the market, but their support or should I say lack of it led to their downfall and position of leadership loss.
    It will be no different if Lenovo continues to act like a machine churner.

  • Exchange 2010 mailbox prompts for authentication to Exchange 2013 mailbox

    I am in the process of a 2010 to 2013 migration. The only issue I can't seem to manage is an authentication issue with Outlook 2010. My Outlook profile consists of my Exchange 2013 mailbox and a shared mailbox on Exchange 2010. Initially, Outlook was prompting
    for authentication to the Exchange 2010 mailbox. Regardless of whether I entered the correct credentials or simply cancelled the prompt, I still had full access to both mailboxes (including Public Folders on 2010). The authentication prompt was removed with
    the following command:
    Get-OutlookAnywhere -Server my2013exchserver | Set-OutlookAnywhere -InternalClientsRequireSsl $true
    The second issue I now have is the reverse of the above: an Exchange 2010 user is prompted for authentication to an Exchange 2013 mailbox. How do I begin to troubleshoot this problem - should I run the same command (above) on 2010? I don't quite understand
    how Outlook communicates with Exchange but I am thinking there is an incorrect setting on one of the Virtual Directories(?).
    Many thanks.

    Hi Dennis,
    Please open Outlook - press CTRL key - right click on the Outlook icon from right bottom corner taskbar –Connection Status to check the connection for your Exchange 2010 mailbox with shared 2013 mailbox. The following example in my test results:
    Please check your connection authentication. We can  run the following command to set your Outlook Anywhere for Exchange 2013:
    Set-OutlookAnywhere -Identity "E15-01\Rpc (Default Web Site)" -InternalClientAuthenticationMethod Ntlm -ExternalClientAuthenticationMethod Basic -ExternalClientsRequireSsl $True -InternalClientsRequireSsl $true
    In Outlook side, please ensure the following settings in Account Settings:
    In Security tab, make sure Always prompt for logon credentials is unchecked and Logon network security is set to Negotiate Authentication.
    Regards,
    Winnie Liang
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for