Withholding tax not captured for a single Vendor during Invoice

Dear SAP Gurus,
Withholding tax is not captured during MIRO for a particular Vendor.  The Vendor Master has been assigned with the relative tax codes. Program RFWT0010 has been run.  Tax Types have been
checked.  Error message was changed to Warning in OBA5.  Message 7Q321 Withholding tax
amount exceeds amount in Vendor line item 001.  Relative SAP notes referred. Withholding tax
type at the time of payment Central Invoice & I ppmt checked.  OBC4 reconciliation account
G067 field status group checked for taxes - optional.   Please give solution.
Thanks and regards,
Sadashivan

Hi,
Check with the minimum amount of the withholding tax code.
Check accumulation activated or not.
If you are using portary dependencies check the base withholding tax code given.
While defining the withholding tax code check the posting indicator and check withholding tax formula is activated or not. if it is active then check the amount given in withholding tax code formulas.
Still problem continue revert back.
Regards,
Sankar

Similar Messages

  • Withholding tax not working for MIRO

    Hi Sap Experts,
    I am able to get TDS challans posted by J1inchln for Invoice postings done by Fb60 Transactions , However for the same vendor when I do Invoice postings through MIRO transactions I get mesage that " No unpaid tax lines exist for the given selection criteria"
    Detailed look of error says under System Response that  " For withholding tax recovered from the vendor, tax line is present in table BSIS, but the corresponding entry is missing in table WITH_ITEM , which is necessary for challan updation"
    Also observed after posting that the accounting doc of MIRO has Business place & Section code present & shows Posting to Withholding tax accounts
    But the MIRO invoice tab for Withholding tax shows With/tax Base & With/tax amount as blank. Could You please advise why this happens.
    How this could be avoided?
    What is the solution for this MIRO not getting Witholding tax?
    I shall appreciate  your resdponse by giving max points for a solution.
    Warm regards
    Marazban Dalal

    thnks

  • Withholding Tax not picking for the current Fiscal year 2014

    Dear Gurus,
    Withholding tax assigned to the vendor is getting picked up for the fiscal year 2013 but when the same vendor is invoiced for year 2014 with the same WHT tax code we could see that there is no tax line getting generated against the Vendor. All the configurations related to WHT are verified. As far as i Know we will not maintain any end date for WHT tax code. request yout to advance.
    Thanks in advance.
    Thanks & Regards
    Srikanth

    hi,
    Please check below mentioned Path - and check date from & to given period
    SPRO- Financial Accounting (New) - Financial Accounting Global Settings (New) -Withholding Tax -Extended Withholding Tax - Company Code -Assign Withholding Tax Types to Company Codes
    select WHT type against Company code -
    W/tax obligated frm 01.04.2010        Oblig.to w/tax until 31.12.2999
    and check vendor master data -
    Thanking you
    Regards
    Mahesh

  • Create withholding tax data subsequently for reconciled and open items in c

    Hi All,
    Mine is a US co code and I have a  vendor for which invoice and payment documents are posted. After posting the invoice i found that the vendor is subjected to classic withholding tax which i did not calculate when posting invoice, making payments.
    Now i have changed the vendor master data with relevant withholding tax details.
    I know the program RFWT0020 allows us to create withholding tax data subsequently for reconciled and open items in cases where vendors or customers become liable for withholding tax with a tax rate of 0 %.
    It is not working out for me.
    Can any body help me on this.
    Thanks in advance.

    Dear all,
    by se38 --> report documentation, You can read carefully the following:
    The auxiliary program makes it possible to convert both classic and extended withholding tax data. However, with classic withholding tax, ONLY VENDOR data can be converted.
    In addition, the program enables the withholding tax code to be changed for reconciled and open items with existing withholding tax data. For this, the tax rate of the existing withholding tax data as well as the tax rate of the new withholding tax code must be 0%. The new withholding tax codes are taken from the customer or vendor master data. In the case of extended withholding tax, the withholding tax code is only changed if the related withholding tax categories are the same.  The withholding tax base amount is not changed by this procedure.
    Recreating or changing the withholding tax data requires that the program first be executed for INVOICES and then executed for PAYMENTS in a subsequent step.
    I hope this helps You.
    Mauri

  • Taxes not  capturing in miro

    Dear All,
                  We have created one import PO. There are materials which are excisable .We have maintained the condition types H edu cess on CVD ,Addnl duty,IN basic customs ,IN CVD ,Edu cess on CVD ,Sec Edu cess on BCD,Ed cess on BCD in condition tab of purchase order. While I am trying to capture MIRO for the materials these taxes are coming for one material X .But for other materials Y,Z these taxes are not coming .
                  I have checked j1id where all these materials have chapter ID, tax indicator maintained is 3 .Excise rate maintained, are same for all the materials . Can any body let me know why taxes are not capturing for material Y and Z.

    hi
    please check this thread
    SAP ERP - Logistics Materials Management (SAP MM)
    and see the reply given by Hemalatha

  • Excise is not captured for all or Second line item.

    Dear Experts,
    Excise is not updating for all the line items in while making Goods Receipt.
    while making goods receipt excise is not capturing for all the line items.
    but excise is captured at header level,its presumed that all the line items
    are capturing excise,please suggest me,what might be the reason.
    Thanks in advance.
    Varun

    Hello,
    As i think, you are creating Goods receipt With Excise option "Only Part1" in MIGO, then system will update only J_1ipart1 table with qty and without internal document number, after J1IEX only system will Update J_1IEXCDTL  table with all value and qty and internal document number.
    Suppose you have done the GR -Option' 'No excise entry" then system will not generate any Excise realted tables. Then you should  Capture Part1 entry with help of J1I5 t code, then system will update qty field , here also system will not update internal doc number.
    Write a Updation program for J_1IPART1 table for qty field
    Mahesh Naik

  • Is withholding tax code applicable for India?

    hi guys,
    Is withholding tax code applicable for India?

    Narottam Das 
    Yes it is applicable for india.
    Regards
    krish

  • Withholding tax not able to view in FBL1N - Vendor Line Item report

    Dear All,
    The VI documents are posted in different vendors. The Tax code has been duly selected and tax was deducted at the time of posting the entry. When we generate the list of vendor line items using standard report FBL1N, we observe that only some of the VI documents in the output show the withholding tax amount in the respective column whereas in some of the VI documents, the withholding tax amount is appearing as zero even though the tax line item is available in the document (same can be seen in FB03).
    Please let us know the possible cause for the same.
    Regards,
    Anand.Inguva

    Dear,
    by FBL1N is not possible to check the Extended WT            
    information due to the technical reasons explained into the note               
    number 363309.                                                                               
    Furthermore please be aware that by the report RFKQST00 and          
    RFIDYYWT You can have all the WT details.                                      
    I hope this helps You.
    Mauri

  • Withholding Tax Calculation Error for Vendor Down Payment Clearing:Oct '09

    Hi,
    We are trying to incorporate the new Withholding Tax Structure w.e.f. 01-Oct-09.
    There were 3 scenarios possible:
    a. Invoice = Down Payment
    b. Invoice < Down Payment
    c. Invoice > Down Payment
    While 1 & 2 were taken care of effectively, the third scenario did not work as expected. The scenario is as follows:
    1. Down Payment (Date : 30/09/09)
    Amt : Rs. 40000/-;
    Withholding Tax @ 15% : Rs. 6000/- (40000 * 15%)
    Surcharge @ 10% : Rs. 600/- (6000 * 10%)
    Edu Cess @ 2% : Rs. 132 (Rs. 6600*2%)
    Higher Edu Cess @ 1% : Rs. 66 (Rs. 6600*2%)
    2. Invoice (Date : 02/09/09) - As per new TDS Rates
    Amt : Rs. 50000/-
    Withholding Tax @ 10% : Rs. 5000/- (50000 * 10%)
    Surcharge : NIL
    Edu Cess : NIL
    Higher Edu Cess : NIL
    3. DPC (Date : 02/09/09) - Reversal of TDS calculated in Down Payment (Step 1) above.
    Issue:
    While making J1INCHLN, amount is adjusted as Rs. -1000/- (hence zero) not payable.
    Also, the Surcharge, Edu Cess & Higher Edu Cess are also getting reversed in DPC.
    As suggested by SAP Note No. 1372734 - Handling of downpayment clearing scenarios after budget '09, the scenario does not seem to work.
    Actual payable should be worked out as under:
    Invoice : Rs. 50,000/-
    DP : Rs. 40,000/-
    Bal : Rs. 10,000/-
    TDS @ 10% : Rs. 1,000/-
    All TDS Challans, Certificates & Returns must reflect Rs. 1000/- in the Challan.
    Require assistance.
    Regards,
    Kapil Tilwani

    Hi Kapil,
    The following needs to be taken care of  -
    The message controls settings as the note suggests must be set as W.
    When entering the details the logic is Vendor Debit amount is Tax amount + 1
    The Vendor credit line, the tax code has to be assigned with the advance amount (amount for which the challan has been created) as the tax base amount and the tax amount will be the extra liability that needs to be created.
    In your example -
    The tax amount will be - 2000 ( the debit at the time of downpayment clearing should have been 4000 instead of 6000)
    Tax base amount -  40000 (Challan for this amount has already been made at the time of downpayment made)
    The vendor Debit - 2001 (2000 + 1)
    The vendor credit - 1
    Note - Tax amount and base amount has to be made manually in the withholding Tax tab for the credit entry.
    Please revert for any clarification.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Anit

  • Withholding tax not calculating in MIRO and calculating in F-43

    Hi,
    Whenever I am positng invoice thru F-43, Calculating withholding tax amount and generating seperate line item for that.
    But for same vendor after posting MM cycle( PO - GR -MIRO) and I am posting Invoice thru MIRO  WHT line item not generating while simulating and also after posting.
    Checks done :
    1. In vendor master data Liable check box is ticked and Tax codes are properly maintained.
    2. Minimun and maximum amounts checked.
    3.Base amounts checked.
    4. Formula for WHT checked
    5. I feel if these setting are not good,it should not post in F-43 also. But it is posting in F-43.
    Kinldy tell me any specific setting for calculating the WHT thru transaction MIRO
    Thanks in advance

    Shankar,
    Thanks for reply.
    If I don't put amount in the basic data tab( MIRO) then it does not allow to "simulate" or "Post". But here I can simulate and Post
    I check every thing in WHT Config but I could't found the solution.
    I want to tell another thing, we recently went to patch upgrade from Version 4.7 E  SP 22   to 4.7 E  SP30.
    My question, Is the pacth upgrade affects in anyway???
    If any suitable answer appreciatable.
    Thanks once again for your reply.

  • Withholding tax not displayed in FBL1N

    Dear All,
    1.Can anyone do help for the displaying the wihtholding tax field in the Vendor Line Item Display.
    2. How to write fi report for displaying withholding tax field in Vendor line item display.
    Regards,
    Harinath.K

    Dear,
    yes, it is not possible to select data from table WITH_ITEM
    within the transaction FBL1N in a transparent and unique way.
    With the extended WT functionality SAP decided to create a new table WITH_ITEM to store the WT data that cannot be reached by FBL1N. Table BSEG contains Classical WT data only.
    And as note 363309 says:
    "Remove the field which contains the withholding tax information
    from your display variant.
    If you want to display the withholding tax information, double-click on
    the document number and subsequently choose 'Withholding tax'."
    I hope this can help You.
    Mauri

  • Extended Withholding Tax not calculating

    Hi
    We are in ECC 6.  In development system, we configured Extended Withhoding Tax for India and tested Vendor Invoice FB60.  It works perfectly without any problem.  It post separate line item for withholding tax as well.
    We moved the configuration to Test system, where it is not working at all.  All settings are as similar as development system.  Vendor master record also similar as development.  The document entered for testing is same as development.
    Why it is not calculating Withholding tax in Test system?  Is it any thing is to be done manually (like activation), table update.. in client independently?
    You suggestion is most impartant.
    Thanks
    Venkat

    Dear Venkatasubramanya,
    Check the following Master data in your Test System......
    1. Vendor Master Data: Check in Withholding tax tab, whether liable tick is activated or not for your Tax Codes
    2. Whether your Withholding tax types are oayment type or invoice type
    check in GL Master (Vendor Reco Account), Field Status Group, Whether Withholding tax fields are optional or not.
    Best Regards

  • Withhold taxes not withheld - F110 Program

    Hi SCN members,
    When the users performed the F110 program and generated the txt file to the bank (That is who print the bank slip.), the bank noticed that the gross amount was printed in the bank slip without subtract the taxes.
    These documents were generated from billing process VF04.
    Apparently, the issue is in the billing documents and not in F110 process because with the user, we have reversed a payment of one document and we have tried to pay it on F110. The result was the same.
    All taxes are not been subtract and not only the taxes withheld in F110. The IRRF tax is withheld in billing process and also is not been subtract.
    I’ve never seen something like that. Have you seen?
    Thanks so much!

    Hi ,
    have you configured Withholding tax on Payment .
    System deduct the withholding tax  In f110 when you configure  Withholding tax type for payment and assign to you comapny code . and then Mainatin in Vendor/ customer master.
    Please check the setting and let us know .

  • Withholding Tax not populated using BAPI

    Hello
    We are using BAPI to post invoices instead of FB60 but noticed a difference in the withholding tax data.
    Using FB60 when we provide a N1, the tax code shows up as starand the withholding tax exempt is populated along with the  withholding tax code from the vendor master.
    When we try to do the same using the BAPI providing it with N1, it does not populate the withholding tax exempt and withholding tax code fields
    We are using classing withholding tax.
    why the BAPI is behaving differently than FB60 and not picking up the standard configuration
    This is priority as we are in Production and invoices which dont have these withholding  tax information are not getting picked up for payment.
    Thanks

    Solved myself...using the ACCOUNTPAYABLE-W_TAX_CODE field to populate the tax code which is stored on the Vendor Master

  • Withholding Taxes not calculating

    Hi All,
    Currently we are using ECC 6.0.
    While creating Vendor we are assigning With Holding Tax codes and I created a BP with this Vendor.
    Now I created a Lease-In Contract for this BP, but system asking tax types and tax group is mandetory under Posting Parameters tab, but those tax types are belongs to Sales and Purchase tax codes.
    So I am unable to do with holding tax calculations and I tried Field status for for Tax types and tax group I did't find.
    Please advice me how I can achive this and is there any configuration settings to do with holding tax.
    Regards,
    CM.

    Hi,
    While assigning withholding tax code in vendor master for payment postings we should only update the withholding tax type. We must not update the withholding tax code. The reason being system always automatically calculate taxes even in the case of final payment.
    You can use report RFWT0010 to adjust the withholding tax information to the relevant withholding tax types. Hope this helps.
    Thanks
    Neel

Maybe you are looking for