Withholding tax warning message

Hi
we maintain the witholding tax at invoice & payment level both in vendor
master data, due to this system always deduct TDS twice at the time of
posting.
we want a check at the time of invociing and payment, system should ask
about TDS whether this needs to be deducted or not.
Regards,
Srinivas

Hi
You can use the exit EXIT_SAPLACC4_001 to have a warning message issued if With Holding Tax is being calculated.
Refer the Notes
OSS Note 306504 - Collective note: BAPIs for the AC Interface
OSS Note 556311 - BAPI in the extended withholding tax
OSS Note 487722 - Using EXTENSION1 for accounting BAPIs
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Similar Messages

Error in number. of withholding tax certificate, Message no. 7Q - Argentina

Hi experts
I have an issue when paying an invoice through out transaction code FBZ2.
The invoice to be paid has a withholding tax. After simulating the payment and try to save it system pops up error message u201C
u201CError in numbering of withholding tax certificate Message no. 7Q626u201D
and system suggest to Check Customizing settings for withholding tax certificate numbering
I have checked it and it seems everything is ok.
I debug the program and clearly see how system is attempting to create new payment doc. But however always getting the same error message and I can not find out where the error is.
With Transaction code SNUM (OBZZ) and object WITH_CTNO1 for our numbering group 000001 we maintain the number range. I also fixed a high number to avoid any error but again same error.
I am lost. Please help !!

Solved.
I forgot to enter the Branch in FBZ2

1 items have not been activated due to inconsistent withholding tax info

Hi Experts,
I am doing Vendor Payment through T code:F-53
That time following error coming.
1 items have not been activated due to inconsistent withholding tax info
Message no. F5787
Diagnosis
The open items display different withholding tax information from the relevant business partner master record. For example, the number of withholding tax types in the open item could differ from the number of withholding tax types in the master record.
System Response
Items are not activated.
Procedure
Change the withholding tax data for the open item in question.
waiting for reply,
In advance Thanks & Regards,
Jemes

Dear Jemes,
the Error message F5 787 normally is displayed when you have
activated withholding tax at time of payment.
If at the moment of positing the invoice the vendor was subject to
withholding tax and afterwards, before the payment, the master data
was changed, there is an inconsistencie between the withholding tax
data in the invoice document and the withholding tax data in the master
record.
You should run report RFWT0010 in order to update withholding tax data
in the invoice according to the new withholding tax data information in
the master record. Please read the note 890111 that can be useful as well.
Please let me know.
I hope this helps You.
Mauri

Issue with Cross-Company code transactions and Extended Withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
I am having an issue with Cross-company code transaction while posting expense with 2 different company codes.
In the 2 company codes, one company code is setup for Withholding tax and other was not set.
While posting in FB50, I am getting the below message and system does not allow to post the invoice.
Company codes have different settings for withholding tax treatment
Message no. F5786
Diagnosis
You are entering a document containing at least one vendor or customer item and which has line items in several company codes. The extended withholding tax treatment has been set to active in one of these company codes, but not in one of the other company codes.
System Response
You cannot enter this kind of document.
Procedure
Enter the transaction in two documents.
For this I tried to test the transaction by activating of extended Withholding tax for both the company codes. Then the invoice is posting correctly now.
The point is if I activate extended withholding tax for the Company code which is not using the setup, will it face any issues in other areas? and also kindly advice whether is this a right way to set up to fix the current problem.
Thanks for the Support and early response will be appreciated.
JBC.

Hi Mamta,
Thanks for the Response. I think you misunderstood my scenario.
For Eg in FB60 with Co code 5065:
I am debiting the Expenses for Co Code 1000(Witholding tax not active) and crediting the Bank Account of Co Code 5065(Withholding tax setup is done for this co code). When I tried to post with these line items I have getting the error.
Posting        GL                   Co Code
Dr          106520(Exp)            1000
Cr          202020(Bank)           5065
For this I tried by activating the Withholding tax for Co code 1000 which is not active before and post it. The system allows me to post the invoice.
I want to know whether is this a right way to solve this issue and will it impact on any other areas by only activating the Withholding tax for a Co code?
Thanks,
Bapu

Error in numbering of withholding tax certificate

Hi ,
I am getting this error, and i have done the certificate certificate number range, and also the number group, but no result came....
Its giving me this error....
please help asap....I will assign points.
Error in numbering of withholding tax certificate
Message no. 7Q626
Diagnosis
An error has occurred during withholding tax certificate numbering.
Procedure
Check your Customizing settings for withholding tax certificate numbering
Thnaks

Check SAP Note No. 127352. Just in case if you cannot, here is what it says.
Solution
Check your Customizing settings:
In the IMG check the settings for
Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings -> ...:
Settings for the company code:
... -> Company Code -> Activate extended withholding tax:
1. Is the extended withholding tax activated for the company code?
(Indicator: Extended withholding tax - yes )
Caution!
If the extended withholding tax is not activated, you should not activate this under any circumstances in the current, productive system. Since the classical and the extended withholding tax functions are independent of each other and also the respective withholding tax data is kept in the database in different tables, there is a need for a separate change process (migration) for the migration from the classical to the extended withholding tax functions. The migration defines a mapping of the withholding tax data (Customizing data, master data and transaction data) of the old withholding tax functions on the data of the extended withholding tax function and creates this. However, no tool is made available by SAP that allows a return to the classical withholding tax functions.
Settings for the extended withholding tax functions:
... -> Withholding Tax -> Extended Withholding Tax -> ...:
... -> Calculation -> Withholding Tax Codes ->
-> Define withholding tax codes
2.1 Is a percentage rate entered for the withholding tax codes?
2.2 If the checkbox Withholding tax formula is activated in the withholding tax code, a scaling must be defined under
... -> Calculation -> Withholding Tax Codes -> Define withholding tax formulas
... -> Company code -> Assign Withholding Tax Types to Company Codes
3. Are the withholding tax types assigned to the company code?
3.1 Is the company code defined as withholding tax obligated from for withholding tax type? (Indicator: Withholding tax obligated from - yes).
3.2. Is the current callup point within the validity period for the obligation?
3.3 For withholding tax on the debit side: is company code defined as subject to withholding tax? (Customer data Subject to withholding tax - yes )
... -> Postings -> Accounts for withholding tax -> ...
4.1 An account must be defined both on the debit side and on the credit side for withholding tax to be paid over.
... -> Define accounts for Withholding Tax to be Paid Over
4.2 For withholding tax codes which are posted with 'Grossing up', an account must be defined for the 'Grossing up' offsetting entry.
... -> Define Accts for W/hold.Tax for "Gross.up" Offsetting Entry
4.3 For withholding tax on the debit side: If the withholding tax type (only for withholding tax during payment) allows self-withholding agent and the company code is authorized to self-withholding agent, an account must be defined for self-withheld withholding tax.
... -> Define Accounts for Self-Withholding Tax
4.4 For withholding tax codes which should be posted with offsetting entry, an account must be defined for offsetting entry.
... -> Define Accounts for Withholding Tax Offsetting Entry
Depending on the rules which are selected for the account determination of the above-mentioned accounts an account must be defined for every withholding tax type or for every combination withholding tax type/tax code. Furthermore, you can also control to debits/credits indicator.
Posting ->, ... Certificate numbering for withholding tax
5. If for withholding tax type ( ...Calculation -> Withholding Tax Type) the option 'no certificate numbering' is not selected, you must carry out all corresponding settings.
Check the settings of the field status groups:
6. The withholding tax for reconciliation and posting accounts must be set to as not suppressed (required or optional).
Check the settings of the vendor or customer master data:
7. The withholding tax types and indicators must be defined as
'liable'.
8. The dialog box does not work if the current callup point is
within the exemption period and no collapsed withholding tax rate
was maintained or if this is equal zero.

Postprocess open items after changing relevant withholding tax types

HI all,
I am getting while creating vendors.
When I enter some value, system accepts it but I get this message for each row I enter:
Postprocess open items after changing relevant withholding tax types (Message # 7Q020)
if any one can provide me and explanation for it, will be nice.
thanks..and i will assign points for any input.
thanks

When you are entering or changing withholding tax type to an existing vendor, this is a standard caution system issues asking you to adjust the open items already existing for this vendor, which is good. Check if you have any open items and execute program RFWT0010 to adjust the items to withholding tax information which are now relevant.

Withholding tax line amount exceeds message no.7Q320

Dear all,
Withholding tax type we are defined as a accumulated type. untill and unless it exceeds the minimum amount system will not calculate the withholding tax once it crosses the minimum amount system will calculate tds from one rupee on words. but now at the time of posting advance payment to vendor the system generates a error namely withholding tax line amount exceeds.
As per my knowledge i convert the error message into warning even i know this not the good practice but according to situation what i did is correct. at the making those changes the system asks the request (workbench). i save under one new request when i transported to another client the system is generating warnings.
when i transport the same from develpoment to quality the system generating error. i come to know this is through request status.
What is the solution for this
Thanks & Regards,
Sankar

Hello
please go thorugh the menu path:
spro->img->Fin acct-> Fin acct Global settings->withholding tax->extended withholding tax->calculation->withholding tax types->defien withholding tax type for payment posting
give ur country key
double click on your W.T type
under central invoice option----you have to select radio button for central invoice & 1st p. pmt
this might solve porblem
please assing points if usefull
srinu

Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome !
TREAD LOCKED SINCE IT IS DUPLICATED FROM THREAD payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi,
On the analysis, the system expects an entry in the T059Q table with
code as XX.
The reason being in the extended withholding tax we use multiple
witholding tax codes and these entries are stored in the table
with_item. And in BSEG we populate the field withholding tax code i.e.
BSEG-QSSKZ with the value 'XX'. In classical withholding tax we used to
store the code directly which is not possible with Extended withholding
tax.
As the field BSEG-QSSKZ refers to the values in the table T059Q-QSSKZ
the entry 'XX" needed in this table for the corresponding country of the
company code to maintain the correct relationship and consistent
database information.
Hence for the statistical purpose and for the internal calculations we
need an entry in the table T059Q. Could you please maintain this code
i.e. 'XX' also in the table T059Q in a test system? Then retest your issue.
This should resolve your issue.
Kind Regards,
Vanessa.

Vendor is Subject to Withholding Tax Message

I have configured withholding tax in my client and it works well. The issue is with the message.
When I post an invoice using transaction MIRO, the system does not give a message that the vendor is subject to withholding tax. It does this when I post an FI invoice and hit enter. I have to go to the Withholding tax tab to check. I need this message before the invoice is saved/posted and not necessarily to check the tab.
Any ideas how to achieve this requirement?
Cheers
Victor

Thanks.
But how do I get the system to give me a message that the vendor is subject to withholding tax when I run transaction MIRO without going to the tab to check if the vendor is subject to withholding tax?
The objective here is that I want a message anytime before I save an invoice if the vendor is subject to withholding tax without the need to go check in the withholding tax tab when entering invoices.
Cheers
Victor

Message 8B565 - Withholding Tax Argentina

Hi,
Whent trying to create a Credit Note referenced to an invoice (for Argentina) the error message 8B565 is displayed.
This only happens if the withholding tax (f.e. J1W1) is determined and the invoice contains a material with a BOM (1 item without pricing).
I have looked for related SAP Notes and no one applies for this case because our support package level.
Is there any customizing missing?
Regards,
Juan

Yes, I've checked every note I´ve found but they are previous to our Component version (SAP ECC 6.0 - support Package SAPKH60405).
Regards,
Juan

Error in withholding tax certificate numbering - message FZ 379

Hi all,
While executing a payment run in F110, a number of vendors are paid and then the payment run is terminated. Opening the log shows the above mentioned error messages for our company code 0011.
Opening the long text also reveals the message number FZ 379 but no further details are given. No OSS notes can be found either under this message number.
This error occurs in a Thai client in which withholding tax is successfully active for 4 years already, so the system behaviour we now have seems "sudden". I mean it is not that we are in a start up phase with teething problems but this happens in a stable production environment.
Customising was done a long time ago and we are unsure where to start looking for the problem based on this little error information. Can anyone help? Thanks a lot in advance.

Hi Madhu,
Another consideration please:
In RFIDYYWT, would you expect option "Activate numbering" to be activated or not?
Because at the moment, they have not maintained any number range objects for option "Number range".
My fear is that their current set up, may make use of the WHT numbering, perhaps triggered by the UNchecked box "No cert. numbering" of the withholding tax type. So if I would activate that checkbox, maybe the certificate numbers are no longer generated and maybe it screws up their withholding tax reporting with RFIDYYWT.
Hope you can comment on this as well. I'm considering to apply the settings as you suggested, then let them carry out a "full incoming invoice to payment and reporting" process in their quality system, to see if there are no unwanted side effects. And then transport it to production, to see if that resolves the stuck payment proposal.
Thanks
Rene

Withholding tax information in MIRO

Hello Friends,
In vendor master the withholding tax type is selected and the liable tick mark is selected.
when posting vendor invoice through transaction F-02 after entering the vendor line item amount the system gives a pop-up for
selecting the withholding tax code, if for that particular transaction no withholding tax is applicable then that pop up can be ignored by pressing enter.
When posting vendor invoice through transaction FB60 a information message in staus bar is displayed saying
Vendor 2001305 is subject to withholding tax
Message no. 7Q333
When posting vendor invoice througth transation MIRO no such information or alert being displayed to the user while processing VIV.
How can we make this possible in MIRO, can any one please suggest.
Regards,

Hi,
System should give message 7Q 333,
check OSS notes
Note 369330 - Warning: customer/vendor subject to w/tax version 2
Note 496208 - FB60, MIRO, messages F5126 and F5122 are not displayed
hope this helps
Reg
D

Withholding tax not captured for a single Vendor during Invoice

Dear SAP Gurus,
Withholding tax is not captured during MIRO for a particular Vendor. The Vendor Master has been assigned with the relative tax codes. Program RFWT0010 has been run. Tax Types have been
checked. Error message was changed to Warning in OBA5. Message 7Q321 Withholding tax
amount exceeds amount in Vendor line item 001. Relative SAP notes referred. Withholding tax
type at the time of payment Central Invoice & I ppmt checked. OBC4 reconciliation account
G067 field status group checked for taxes - optional. Please give solution.
Thanks and regards,
Sadashivan

Hi,
Check with the minimum amount of the withholding tax code.
Check accumulation activated or not.
If you are using portary dependencies check the base withholding tax code given.
While defining the withholding tax code check the posting indicator and check withholding tax formula is activated or not. if it is active then check the amount given in withholding tax code formulas.
Still problem continue revert back.
Regards,
Sankar

Extended Withholding Tax ( Minimum/maximum Base Amount ) - with accumulati

We are facing problem in posting of vendor Invoice. Actually we have implemented Minimum base amount ( Rs. 75000/- ) at withholding tax type level and accumulation at per year in withholding tax type A1 ( for testing purpose ) and assign the same to a vendor. We have booked some invoices up to RS. 75000/- system working fine, no WHT is deducted. But now we have received a another Invoice Rs. 5000/- and at the time of booking of invoice system giving an error message
I have changed the error message to warning but itu2019s again showing the same error message.
Actually the problem is system calculate the WHT from the beginning of the year to till date and the amount of Vendor invoice is less the than the amount of WHT but itu2019s legal requirement and we have to post the financial entry as mentioned below
Fictitious figures
Vendor Account           Dr.           Rs,      1500.00     ( Debit instead of credit )
Expense Account           Dr.           Rs.      5000.00     ( Actual exp. Of Invoice )
WHT Payable Account            Cr.           Rs.      6500.00     ( Total WHT from the beginning
Please provide the any.
SAP reply
Dear Customer,
We understand your requirement. But the standard SAP system does not support a scenario where an invoice amount in lower than the tax amount.
This is not a localization specific requirement. The accumulation logic is a generic system behaviour and all countries use it. We cannot make any change in the standard in this regard and change the current system behaviour.
Option to handle this in the system
The only way this can be handled in the system is once the accumulation limit has been reached, use a separate tax type tax code with out accumulations.
Though this is not the ideal solution, this is the best possible solution for your requirement.
Accumulation is not localized for India and the standard solution vailable for all the countries is used by Indian customers too.
SAP is currently not looking at any enhancements to this feature.
Other than the option mentioned above, there is no other way of handling this in the system.
Best Regards,
Soumya
If any one have any otehr solution please inform us.

This cannot be possible for two reasons.
1. If you are not able to recover the amount from the Vendor, you'll have to bear it yourself which is a loss to the company.
2. Even if such a process is provided, you cannot alter the previous invoices and your EWT amount does not correspond to the invoice you account for. SAP works in an assumption that Tax will be calculated as a % of base price and cannot exceed it.
The only way to mitigate this is to decide whether a Vendor would require this exemption to be declared based on past experience and past amount of transactions in the beginning itself. If it is unlikely, better do not declare the accumulation limit for them. This will save you from incurring loss and reducing the risk for the company. Start deducting right from the beginning.
If you are not sure, instead of giving accumulation, you can declare exemption upto 75000. In this case, SAP cannot check whether the Vendor has crossed the limit or not. You'll have to manually check and pass a Debit note to that extent when he exceeds the limit. Again, this does not evade the risk of loss for the company. Also, you cannot do TDS post processing for this amount (like TDS Remittance challan, TDS Certificate etc).
So, in my opinion, try and decide if the Vendor would require accumulation right in the beginning itself. Even if not able to decide, you can still deduct the tax and issue a TDS certificate, which the Vendor can claim refund based on his transactions with you from the Income Tax in case he does not exceed the limit. This will limit the risk of loss for the company.
Ravi.

How to clear line items with withholding tax manually

hi Experts,
i posted a vendor invoice with withholding tax and i made payment as well but not through f-58.
now i wanted to clear these two through f-44 but it gives the message withholding tax information ignored and didnt display the invoice as open item.
how do i clear both the trasactions
regards
suresh

hi Praisty,
thanks for the reply
i have a second opinion on your statement that no matter whatever tcode you use for payment it will clear the open item. Even in F-58, if u make partial payment it will not clear you open item. But i didnt use f-58 as i said earlier.
i used FBV1 for parking the document through which i entered the payment details...ofcourse it doesnt have the option for clearing the open items, cheque printing and it will not update your cheque register. i posted the parked document through FBV0. for all practical purposes, this is my payment document but it didnt clear my open item, in order to clear it i now used f-44.
regards
suresh

Withholding tax warning message

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for