WLC2x06 auto-anchor to 4400 appears to fail

Hi, has anyone seen this problem, or is this a bug:
Auto-anchor is configured for guest mobility and has been working fine on a number of 4400 controllers in a mobility group. Guests get auto-anchored to a 4400 with access to the guest DMZ
we have now introduced both 2006 and 2106 controllers into the mobility group, however clients are net getting DHCP when coming through these controllers.
debugs show an apparent disinterest on the part of the 4400 to respond to mobility anchor requests from the 2x06, and mobility statistics report increase in 'ignored' requests
mobility debug on 4400 for unsuccessful request from 2106:
Wed May 23 15:31:34 2007: Mobility packet received from:
Wed May 23 15:31:34 2007: 192.168.156.2, port 16666, Switch IP: 192.168.156.2
Wed May 23 15:31:34 2007: type: 3(MobileAnnounce) subtype: 0 version: 1 xid: 200 seq: 200 len 120
Wed May 23 15:31:34 2007: group id: dedbb34b 687b56c2 633f1d4d 73ed6709
Wed May 23 15:31:34 2007: mobile MAC: 00:19:d2:d5:eb:39, IP: 0.0.0.0, instance: 0
Wed May 23 15:31:34 2007: VLAN IP: 192.168.156.2, netmask: 255.255.255.0
Wed May 23 15:31:35 2007: Mobility packet received from:
Wed May 23 15:31:35 2007: 192.168.156.2, port 16666, Switch IP: 192.168.156.2
Wed May 23 15:31:35 2007: type: 3(MobileAnnounce) subtype: 0 version: 1 xid: 200 seq: 200 len 120
Wed May 23 15:31:35 2007: group id: dedbb34b 687b56c2 633f1d4d 73ed6709
Wed May 23 15:31:35 2007: mobile MAC: 00:19:d2:d5:eb:39, IP: 0.0.0.0, instance: 0
Wed May 23 15:31:35 2007: VLAN IP: 192.168.156.2, netmask: 255.255.255.0
Wed May 23 15:31:36 2007: Mobility packet received from:
Wed May 23 15:31:36 2007: 192.168.156.2, port 16666, Switch IP: 192.168.156.2
Wed May 23 15:31:36 2007: type: 16(MobileAnchorExport) subtype: 0 version: 1 xid: 201 seq: 201 len 244
Wed May 23 15:31:36 2007: group id: dedbb34b 687b56c2 633f1d4d 73ed6709
Wed May 23 15:31:36 2007: mobile MAC: 00:19:d2:d5:eb:39, IP: 0.0.0.0, instance: 0
Wed May 23 15:31:36 2007: VLAN IP: 192.168.156.2, netmask: 255.255.255.0
Wed May 23 15:31:36 2007: Received Anchor Export request: 00:19:d2:d5:eb:39
from Switch IP: 192.168.156.2
Mobility debug on 4400 with successful request/resonse from another controller:
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: Mobility packet received from:
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: 192.168.160.13, port 16666, Switch IP: 192.168.160.13
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: type: 16(MobileAnchorExport) subtype: 0 version: 1 xid: 243028 seq: 29509 len 244
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: group id: dedbb34b 687b56c2 633f1d4d 73ed6709
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: mobile MAC: 00:12:f0:82:57:00, IP: 0.0.0.0, instance: 0
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: VLAN IP: 192.168.160.13, netmask: 255.255.255.0
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: Received Anchor Export request: 00:12:f0:82:57:00
from Switch IP: 192.168.160.13
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: Received Anchor Export policy update, valid mask 0x0:
Qos Level: 3, DSCP: 0, dot1p: 0 Interface Name: , ACL Name:
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: Mobility packet sent to:
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: 192.168.160.13, port 16666, Switch IP: 192.168.160.12
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: type: 17(MobileAnchorExportAck) subtype: 0 version: 1 xid: 243028 seq: 40918 len 272
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: group id: dedbb34b 687b56c2 633f1d4d 73ed6709
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: mobile MAC: 00:12:f0:82:57:00, IP: 192.168.191.16, instance: 1
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: VLAN IP: 192.168.191.2, netmask: 255.255.255.192
Wed May 23 15:31:41 2007: 00:12:f0:82:57:00 192.168.191.16 WEBAUTH_REQD (8) Plumbing duplex mobility tunnel to 192.168.160.13
as Export Anchor (VLAN 191)
all help appreciated!
Graeme

Hello
I don?t think the 20x6 controller support that.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn40216.html#wp44028
These software features are not supported on 2000 and 2100 series controllers:
?Termination of guest controller tunnels (origination of guest controller tunnels is supported)

Similar Messages

Solaris 10 sshd + GSSAPI auth appears to fail with long usernames.

Solaris 10 sshd using GSSAPI mode appears to fail with long usernames.
We have recently jumbo-patched solaris 10 server and windows 2k3 kerberos kdc. We wish to provide the single sign on thing for our Windows users, as written up in http://220-245-28-18.static.tpgi.com.au/~irvinee/gssapi-sol10/gssapi-howto.html
Everything is fine, until a user with a ten character username comes along. The ten character username does not get the single sign on experience
However, he can kinit fine on Solaris 10 server and also on other unix clients.
If I switch from the stock solaris 10 sshd to a self-compiled OpenSSH linked against MIT Kerberos, the 10 char username gets single-sign-on and all is well..
I note I have no problem when the server is FreeBSD 6.2 and the client is stock solaris 10 ssh.
It seems to be the Solaris 10 sshd only that is affected. Before I write up a bug report, has anyone else come across the same problem?

I finally got it working. I think my problem was that I was coping and pasting the /etc/pam.conf from Gary's guide into the pam.conf file.
There was unseen carriage returns mucking things up. So following a combination of the two docs worked. Starting with:
http://web.singnet.com.sg/~garyttt/Configuring%20Solaris%20Native%20LDAP%20Client%20for%20Fedora%20Directory%20Server.htm
Then following the steps at "Authentication Option #1: LDAP PAM configuration " from this doc:
http://docs.lucidinteractive.ca/index.php/Solaris_LDAP_client_with_OpenLDAP_server
for the pam.conf, got things working.
Note: ensure that your user has the shadowAccount value set in the objectClass

Cisco Auto Anchor Web Authentication - NAS IP Address

Hi,
I've setup auto anchor web authentication for my guest network. I want my Web Authentication requests to be authenticated by ISE however need the authenticating device to be the Anchor Controller.
I setup the WLAN to authenticate against ACS4.2 and it works correctly, the NAS IP address is the Anchor controller. When changing the WLAN to auth again my ISE 1.2 server, authentications are sourced from the foreign controller.
Has anyone come across this or know why ISE is seeing the NAS IP Address as the foreign wireless controller?
Thanks,

Hi,
I've setup auto anchor web authentication for my guest network. I want my Web Authentication requests to be authenticated by ISE however need the authenticating device to be the Anchor Controller.
I setup the WLAN to authenticate against ACS4.2 and it works correctly, the NAS IP address is the Anchor controller. When changing the WLAN to auth again my ISE 1.2 server, authentications are sourced from the foreign controller.
Has anyone come across this or know why ISE is seeing the NAS IP Address as the foreign wireless controller?
Thanks,

FlexConnect (aka H-REAP) and Auto-Anchor functionality

Hi Board,
I never did H-REAP on my wireless deployments. Now, I have an H-REAP (FlexConnect) requirement for branch offices.
Also there is the requirement for guest access at the same time.
From my understanding those features (FlexConnect and Auto-Anchor) should work together.
Please refer to the following exibit:
There is a FlexConnect AP at my branch office. The traffic from internal users (SSID "Internal") should be switches locally at the LAP (Lightweight Access Point). At the same time the guest SSID (SSID "Guest") should be tunneled back via CAPWAP to the controller to which the LAP is associated ("Central Controller"). The guest traffic should not emerge (switched) at the "Central Controller", instead it should be tunneled to an anchor controller in a DMZ via an "Ethernet Over IP tunnel" (Auto-Anchor functionality).
First question: Does this work (FlexConnect in conjunction with Auto-Anchor functionality)?
If this works, where's the web portal for guest authentication hosted (if using the internal web auth on WLC)? On the "central controller" or the Anchor controller? (I guess at the Anchor Controller in the DMZ, right?)
Is it possible to leave the guest SSID "open" with no webauth and still using the Anchor Controller? This would be needed if I have an external web authentication service, which would be hosted by a provider.
Thanks in advance for all your replies!
Johannes

The Flex 7500 deployment guide ("
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps11635/products_tech_note09186a0080b7f141.shtml
") states:
"The Cisco FlexConnect Solution also supports Central Client Data Traffic, but it should be limited to Guest data traffic only."
later in the document there is a section about Guest access that states "Flex 7500 will allow and continue to support creation of EoIP tunnel to your guest anchor controller in DMZ."
Hope that helps.

I'm attempting to install cs6 and after hitting install the following message appeared: installer failed to initialize. please download adobe support advisor to detect the problem. well that has been discontinued...

i'm attempting to install cs6 and after hitting install the following message appeared: installer failed to initialize. please download adobe support advisor to detect the problem. well that has been discontinued...

rename OOBE Folder to OOBE.old.
to find OOBE:
64 bit OS: Program Files x86\Common Files\Adobe\OOBE
32 bit OS: Program Files \Common Files\Adobe\OOBE

Layer 2 security with WLAN auto-anchor mobility

Hello,
I was wondering if Layer 2 security can be used with auto-anchored WLANs.
I need to deploy two new isolated WLANs which will terminate in two DMZ environments.
I was hoping to use the existing WCS-managed infrastructure with 4404 and 4402 WLCs and just throw on a couple more WLANs.
However, I've built a little test environment and while I can get the new VLAN traffic tunneled and origininating from the correct anchor controller with no layer 2 security - as soon as I turn on WEP or WPA security options it stops working. I can't find anything in documents or this forum to show auto-anchor mobility with anyhing other than unsecured guest WLANs.
Am I trying to do somethng unsupported or is it just an error on my part?

Hi Greg,
no, the users are internal so I only want to use L2 security. I can't see that L3 should be a problem to add on though. I'm using 3.2.x of the WLC code - so there is no "Guest LAN" mode - I was playing with the new versions and it looks like L2 security is disabled in that mode?
If you want to see how I got my bit working I would be happy to share my doco when I'm done.
regards,
Aaron

WLC Mobility Auto-Anchor Code Matrix

Hi guys,
I am involved with a project where I will be upgrading WiSM1s with WiSM2s and moving to the 7.2 code to support the funky new 3600 APs
The question I have is that there are some other foreign controllers of differing flavours 5508/4402 and maybe others that are tunnelled back to the WiSM1s and using these as an auto-anchor - So what are the compatibility options I have here for code support please?
I have been told there is a compatibility matrix but all I can find is the software compatibility matrix, but this does not have anchor specific code details. Maybe this means it dosen't matter but I know it had certain limitations in the past and is now opened up to differing code support since 5.2 (I think), but just not sure now whether things may change again given the next generation 7.2 code now being out.
Thanks
Rocky

Hi Scott,
Thanks for that, I was hoping someone had already set it up!
I was looking at that matrix earlier but it didn't look right to me as according to the table it is supported back to 4.2? I am positive I read this feature only kicked in at 5.2.
Thanks again
Rocky
Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

HT201302 The auto play does not appear when I connect my iphone. How to get it to appear?

My auto play has stopped appearing when I connect my iphone. How do I get it to reappear so I can download my photos and videos to my computer.

Hi tleuschner,
Thanks for visiting Apple Support Communities.
Does your iPhone appear in My Computer or Windows Explorer after it's connected? If not, see this article for some troubleshooting help:
iPod not recognized in 'My Computer' and in iTunes for Windows
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1369
Best,
Jeremy

Is local EAP + Web Authentication possible in Auto Anchor Configuration

Hi,
I have a wireless network setup in an auto-anchor configuration with the foreign and anchor controllers. Due to the foreign controller being owned and managed by another company, I have an interesting authentication scenerio I would like to acheive. We can't implement full EAP-TLS as we would have to allow authentications from the foreign controller which is owned and managed by another company.
Currently Web Authentication is working correctly for the Wireless Network. As another layer of security, I want to know if its possible for the wireless clients to trust a certificate installed on the foreign controller? If so, are you able to point me in the direction of a user guide to implement.
I found the following document which describes local EAP configuration . Would this work with Web Authentication?
Thanks

so, kinda but no. EAP is a layer 2 authentication that uses encryption as well.
WebAuth is a layer3 authentication only.
Now the kinda....you can create guest/network users on the WLC local database, and if someone logins to the webauth portal with those credentials they will be able to get on.
I'm not really sure what you are looking to do based on your post.
Personally, if I had users that were going to roam to this controller, I'd work with that companies IT and get it linked to my AAA server and keep the EAP-TLS that I had working already going. Just because that WLC would be able to communicate to your AAA doesn't mean their users would be able to get on, as they wouldn't have the machine or client certificate nor the Root CA cert on their machines.
HTH,
Steve

`test-replicationhealth QUORUMGROUP appears as failed

Hello,
I have monitored this failure while i was upgrading my clients Exchange 2010 SP1 servers to SP3. In my client environment they have 2 HUB/CAS servers and 2 Mailbox servers.
When i check test-replicationhealth QUORUMGROUP appears as failed. Screenshot is attached what could be the reason. From each server Witness share can be accessed.Please help me to rectify this issue..
Tks,
Dilshan

Hi,
I would like to verify if you can bring the Quorum Group online via Failover Cluster Manager.
What's more, please make sure that the account for DAG cluster is enabled. If it is disabled accidently, this issue will occur.
If the issue persists, please check if there is any error event in Failover Cluster Manager.
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Amy
Amy Wang
TechNet Community Support

Guest tunnel/auto-anchor from 2100 to 4400 WLC

We’d like to extend our current Guest LAN from a 4400 WLC in our data center to a 2100 WLC located at a remote facility. However, we cannot get the foreign controller to pass traffic to the anchor controller – or so it seems. The catch is that we’re not actually trying to extend the SSID itself to provide wireless access, but instead flub it so that we can provide local wired access tunneled to the Guest LAN on the anchor WLC. I’m not entirely sure if this is possible, because I’ve read that before the EoIP tunnel will come up a guest client must associate to the foreign WLC.
We’ve followed the instructions we could find that go over setting up this type of scenario, but unfortunately they only cover setting up back-to-back 4400 controllers and as such, some functions described (notably being able to create a Guest LAN) are not possible on the 2100. We haven’t been able to find a clear and concise guide on the scenario we want to set up.
Here’s some detail:
Mobility group is up/up between both WLCs. Both WLCs are running 6.0.x code.
Anchor WLC – 3750G-24WS-S25 (a 4400 WLC w/ integrated 3750G-24)
Guest LAN WLAN “wired-guest” created; Ingress is “none” and Egress is our existing “dirtnet” – i.e. outside access. The “dirtnet” interface is *not* a Guest LAN interface. Mobility anchor is set as local.
Remote WLC – WLC2106
WLAN “wired-guest” created; Interface is “wired” w/ an IP address on the same subnet as the anchor “dirtnet” and associated with port 2. Mobility anchor is set to the anchor WLC and is up/up. I have a laptop connected to port 2 with a statically assigned IP address on the same subnet as “dirtnet.” I am able to ping the local port 2 address, but I can’t ping across the tunnel to the anchor WLC. I also cannot ping the anchor WLC "dirtnet" interface from the foreign WLC’s Ping tool.
Are we missing something?

Sean,
Wired guest access is not supported on WLC2106.
Reference:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a00808ed026.shtml#configs
Please consider using a WISM, WLC4400, 3750 integrated WLC or a WLC5500

Auto calc time for shot duration, fails to change or appears to be in fixed mode.

Switching back and forth online to offline as you recommended is causing sync issues, additionally, the shot duration set for auto calc defaults back to custom so not certain if times are fixed, correct or not.
drgm

Downloaded Windows Assessment and Deployment Kit which contains the latest imagex program.
Running imagex.exe on the BASE7.WIM file on the second System Recovery DVD:
imagex.exe /info K:\PRELOAD\BASE7.WIM
ImageX Tool for Windows
Version: 6.2.9200.16384
Error opening file [K:\PRELOAD\BASE7.WIM].
The data is invalid.
The same error message is shown for BASE7.WIM, BASE8.WIM, and BASE9.WIM.
The other WIM files in the PRELOAD directory, BASE5.WIM, BASE6.WIM, BASE10.WIM, BASE13.WIM, BASE15.WIM, BASE17.WIM and BASE23.WIM, could be read by imagex without any errors.

Auto Approval of Self User Registration Fails OIM 11g R2

Use Case : Auto Approval of Self User Registration
Steps followed
1. A New Approval Policy created with Auto Approval flag set as True for Request Level Approval.
2. A New Approval Policy created with Auto Approval flag set as True for Operation Level Approval.
3. The field Organization was pre populated using the Pre Population Adapter, as mentioned below.
+<AttributeReference name="Organization" attr-ref="act_key" type="Long" widget="ENTITY" length="256" required="false" available-in-bulk="false" entity-type="ORGANIZATION">+
+<PrePopulationAdapter name="OrgPrepopulateAdapter" classname="com.plugin.OrgPrepopulateAdapter"/>+
+</AttributeReference>+
4. A new user was created using the "Register New user" Link.
5. Log in as System Adminstration and under Track requests, found that the New request has failed.
6. On click of Request link, the request details shows the Organization field has populated with the expected value.
7. The Logs suggests that the Request failed due to Organization field going Null.
LOG
[2013-02-12T15:50:39.138+05:30] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [oracle.iam.request.impl] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '7' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: e171ff3c1743d36a:6c2e4f90:13ccdc4a231:-8000-00000000000006f8,0] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Exception thrown java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 0, Size: 0
[2013-02-12T15:50:39.138+05:30] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [oracle.iam.request.impl] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '7' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: e171ff3c1743d36a:6c2e4f90:13ccdc4a231:-8000-00000000000006f8,0] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Exception thrown Index: 0, Size: 0[[
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 0, Size: 0
     at java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck(ArrayList.java:547)
     at java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:322)
     at oracle.iam.requestactions.approval.operationlevel.OrgBasedMethodology.getOrgDetails(OrgBasedMethodology.java:215)
-------------

Use Case : Auto Approval of Self User Registration
Steps followed
1. A New Approval Policy created with Auto Approval flag set as True for Request Level Approval.
2. A New Approval Policy created with Auto Approval flag set as True for Operation Level Approval.
3. The field Organization was pre populated using the Pre Population Adapter, as mentioned below.
+<AttributeReference name="Organization" attr-ref="act_key" type="Long" widget="ENTITY" length="256" required="false" available-in-bulk="false" entity-type="ORGANIZATION">+
+<PrePopulationAdapter name="OrgPrepopulateAdapter" classname="com.plugin.OrgPrepopulateAdapter"/>+
+</AttributeReference>+
4. A new user was created using the "Register New user" Link.
5. Log in as System Adminstration and under Track requests, found that the New request has failed.
6. On click of Request link, the request details shows the Organization field has populated with the expected value.
7. The Logs suggests that the Request failed due to Organization field going Null.
LOG
[2013-02-12T15:50:39.138+05:30] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [oracle.iam.request.impl] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '7' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: e171ff3c1743d36a:6c2e4f90:13ccdc4a231:-8000-00000000000006f8,0] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Exception thrown java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 0, Size: 0
[2013-02-12T15:50:39.138+05:30] [oim_server1] [ERROR] [] [oracle.iam.request.impl] [tid: [ACTIVE].ExecuteThread: '7' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] [userId: oiminternal] [ecid: e171ff3c1743d36a:6c2e4f90:13ccdc4a231:-8000-00000000000006f8,0] [APP: oim#11.1.2.0.0] Exception thrown Index: 0, Size: 0[[
java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 0, Size: 0
     at java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck(ArrayList.java:547)
     at java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:322)
     at oracle.iam.requestactions.approval.operationlevel.OrgBasedMethodology.getOrgDetails(OrgBasedMethodology.java:215)
-------------

CS3 - Auto Anchored objects

Hi all,
I would like to speed up my workflow enormously. I have a very repetitive thing that I need to speed up somehow...
I receive supplied text that requires formatting. I have just about everything automated except inserting graphics into certain locations. I currently insert an object as an anchored object one by one wherever it needs to be put..
The things is, all the graphic objects are identical (the exact same file), and they appear hundreds of time throughout the document.
The objects are to all behave exactly the same way so a style could be set up - it's just the matter of placing the object hundreds of times every time I get new text to update the file with. So at the moment, I am spending way way way too much time individually placing each object one by one.
I'm not a highly experienced ID user, so I'm hoping I'm just missing something here. I've scoured tutorials and help and the web to no avail. Hence my post here.
Currently, they put the text code "grphc" where they want the little picture in the text supplied to me. I then do a search for "grphc" in the find function. It finds it, I then select this code and place the inline object. I then go back to the find function to show me the next code. It takes me straight to it, I then repeat the process of selecting the text code, place the object, find the next code, select the code, place the object, find the next code, select the text, place the object, find the next code, select it, place the thing, find the next, select it, place it... and so on and so on till my brain hurts through a very very repetitive operation. It hurts!.
Please help me automate this very time consuming and brain numbing repetitive action...
Like I said, I'm not a heavily experienced user of InDesign, so I'm hoping that I am simply missing something. (I can only hope)
I'm hoping that a very easy, almost 'one click' fix can replace the special code with this little grpahic.
I mean, I can find all occurrences of a given text in the document and replace it all in one hit with some other text, but it seems to not allow to replace text with a graphic.
please help. even if the answer is in front of my face & cannot see it..
Thanks very much in advance.
Graeme.

WOW!!!,
Thankyou Dave, that works a treat.
I must admit though, I am surprised that with the amount of power ID has with this Find/Replace function that it doesn't have the ability to find and replace with a graphic.
Maybe I should put a wish list to ID to add this find text and replace with an object feature...
Graeme.

New network interfaces appear / networking fails

Hi
I have a strange behaviour of my ethernet networking interface. Every time I restart the mac the network connection is lost (I usally keep it in sleep and have no problems for days and weeks).
As soon as I enter the network setup I get the message that a new network connection has been found, called "Ethernet (integrated) 1 (or 2, 7, 8 number increases)"
If I look at my network configuration I see a long list of "Ethernet interface ((null))" and in beetween some "Ethernet (integrated) 1)" and the like
It usally takes a couple of restarts of the network preferences and then the interface appears in the "network status" view and the mac connects to the router.
I don't have any external networking cards and the like, just the ibook and a standard router. The router also connects to our mac mini without any problems I it ran for at least half a year with the ibook before this occured.
I would be very thankfull for any help since this is very annoying.
BTW I don't move the computer around and it is connected with a network cable.
Cheers
Peter

1st step, get Applejack...
http://www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/macosx/19596
After installing, reboot holding down CMD+s, then when the prompt shows, type in...
applejack AUTO
Then let it do all 5 of it's things.
At least it'll eliminate some questions if it doesn't fix it.
2nd step, trash, (or drag to the desktop), these files...
/Users/nnnn/Library/Preferences/com.apple.internetconnect.plist
/Library/Preferences/SystemConfiguration/preferences.plist
/Library/Preferences/SystemConfiguration/NetworkInterfaces.plist
/Library/Preferences/com.apple.networkConfig.plist

WLC2x06 auto-anchor to 4400 appears to fail

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for