WM- Wrongly triggered storage section in 902 storage type

hi
   I maintained the storage section( B11) in 902/ WE-ZONE . When i generated the GRN against purchase order ,
   during transfer syatem storage type 902 is triggering the storage section 001.. i dont want system trigger the storage
   section 001 for storage type 902..the system should generate the 902 for storage section(B11)
With Regards
Dinesh
Edited by: code acess on Dec 29, 2011 5:22 AM

Hi,
This is a std system behaviour, since the configuration is done like this in SPRO.Please check for the settings against storage type 902.
spro->Logistics execution->WM->Master data-->Define storage type -
>Define stsorage section
The system picks the section from here
Regards,
Velu

Similar Messages

Wrong dest.storage type (921 / TRANSFER) is chosen when picking of OBD

Hi Folks,
I am configuring a new warehouse. while testing of the same i came across below issue.
wrong dest.storage type and dynamic storage bin (921 / TRANSFER instead of 916 / OBD No.) is chosen when picking of Outbound Delivery.
What may be the reason of this when all the settings of LE-WM interface are in place ?
I have made the configuration similar to an existing WH and same is working fine there.

IM-LE interface is one thing.
You should get from IM-LE interface which WM-movement type is used for your IM-movement type (in standard system e.g. im-mvt 601, 641, 643 for GI --> they are linked to wm-mvt 601).
In the definition of the wm-mvt (V_T333) you should have:
- destination storage type: '916' (V_T333-NLTYP)
- dymic bin inducator: 'X' (V_T333-NKDYN)
(Please be careful because wm-mvt definition as well as IM-LE interface setting might be WH specific...)
If your settings in config are proper, you should check your develpments (user exists, etc)...

Multiple bins in one section in storage type with 'C' open storage strategy

Experts,
I am doing random storage replenishment process for a Low rack location. The replenishment gets triggered from high rack to low rack.
The low rack storage type is defined as next empty bin as putaway strategy and the storage type contains multiple bins in each section.
There is process change and I want to place multiple SUs in one bin , I want to use the putaway strategy as 'C' open storage
and mixed storage allowed with SUT check and SU management active . It is working fine as expected in terms of triggering replenishment
and storing multiple SUs in 1 bin.My concern is that as a rule open storage should contain only one storage bin for section.But in my design , each section contains
multiple storage bins. Does is really hurt in any form? What are consequences? Please suggest.
Thanks in advance

Experts,
I am doing random storage replenishment process for a Low rack location. The replenishment gets triggered from high rack to low rack.
The low rack storage type is defined as next empty bin as putaway strategy and the storage type contains multiple bins in each section.
There is process change and I want to place multiple SUs in one bin , I want to use the putaway strategy as 'C' open storage
and mixed storage allowed with SUT check and SU management active . It is working fine as expected in terms of triggering replenishment
and storing multiple SUs in 1 bin.My concern is that as a rule open storage should contain only one storage bin for section.But in my design , each section contains
multiple storage bins. Does is really hurt in any form? What are consequences? Please suggest.
Thanks in advance
Hello,
You are right. Normally it does not hurt, but what you are doing with the new process change contradicts your original design. Can you explain why you had storage sections in the area in the original design? Did you segregate SKU's by product families/fast movers etc....and now you dont have that requirement anymore or your SKU management has changed?

Question about storage type 902

Hello Everybody!
I´m implementing SAP WM and I have a doubt and is the next one:
When I do a material movement, system returns an error if the material is not create in the destiny storage type.
On the other hand, I create a purchase order and when I make the good entrance, the system stocks the material in the storage type 902 even the material is not create in this storage type.
Why is the reason for this? Is not necessary to create the materials in the standar storage type like 902?
Thank you very much for your help!

Hello Javier
You are right when it comes to goods receipt or goods issue. All the 9** series storage types are interim storage types which are fictitious. You only have to create 1 bin for each interim storage types. When you create the material master maintain the WM views only for the warehouse number and the other storage types that you use where all the bins are located. For storage types 902 the PO/inbound delivery number and for 916 outbound delivery number will be displayed as the bin numbers which are dynamic bins that gets deleted automatically once you complete the movements.
Thanks
Anandha

LT06 enhancement - How to update Storage type and Storage section

Hi,
My requirement is to update Storage bin, Storage type and Storage section, while creating Transfer order from through LT06. So I used the enhancement MWMTO003 to update Storage Bin in LT06 and it is also working.
Similarly I need to update Storage type and Storage section using userexit or BADI.
Is there any way to update Storage type and storage section in LT06?

Check enhancement MWMTO007.
regards

Stock transfer Order goods receipt puts goods into storage type 902 Q

How do we configure the STO GR to use storage type 917 as our purchase oders do?
Thanks

Hi,
Please check your settings in WM-IM interface (SPRO > LE > WM > Interfaces > IM > Define Movement Types). HEre you can check which WM-mvt belongs to (trough reference mvt) the IM-mvt.
After that (knowing which WM-mvt is to be modified), in SPRO > LE > WM > Activities > Transfers > Define Movement Types, you can define the interim storage type for your WM-mvt (please take care of choosing the proper WH & mvt combination).
Regards,
Csaba

Transfer between storage types and putaway strategies

Dear All,
Here is my scenario and please guide me on as detailes as you gurus can on how to proceed achieve this:
When receiving good from a PO the materials are received in 902: How to move them to my Raw materials storage type?
Note: I have defined 4 storages types, one for raw materials, one for production, one for Finished goods and one for spare parts.
And once I move the materials into the warehouse, what strategies do I have to define in order to place the materials in specific bins? Here's an explanation on how I need the putaway:
I have 5 different racks or stacks but I need all materials to be placed in a specific row of the first level, lets say material A in 01-A-01 the first 2 digits are stack then level then row(SS-L-RR); Material B should be placed 01-A-02 Material C 01-A-03; meaning all the materials should be placed in the level A of stack 1 but if there is another recepit of material A and it is already full then the system should propose another bin doesn't matter which one as long as it is not in the first level (because this positions are reserved for other materials).
This is the same for materials D, E, F but those are to be placed in stack 02 in level A
I need this because that's the way my client work right now, it is like Lean manufacturing strategy, so whenever they need to pick materials they always have them available at the lowest level
Is there an automatic bin to bin TO creation for when the picking empty the bin at the lowest level then a TO should be triggered automaticaly saying move from whatever bin the material is available to the "fixed" bin assigned in level A
Stack 1                         Stack 2
Level     1     2     3          Level     1     2     3
D     free     free     free          D     free     free     free
C     free     free     free          C     free     free     free
B     free     free     free          B     free     free     free
A     A     B     C          A     D     E     F
The variable here is that as I said before I have 5 Racks so in the other 3 stacks doesn't matter the levels, the materials can be placed wherever, and this will happen when receiving material A but all stack 1 is full then system should try to place it in the nearest bin available of stack 2 (only levels B, C, D) or if this is also full, then goes to stack 3 ( all levels available)
Please advise on how to map this, and the transactions and mvt types involved, and also please explain how should I make the picking or removal strategy to propose the picking always from the specific lower level bin, if not enough qty available then go and pick from other bin (and if it is possible at this point to create a TO to refill the fixed lower bin)
Thanks in advande to all.
Julio

Hi,
Try using movement type 313 and 315
313 -- Transfer posting SL to SL --- Remove from issuing SL
315 -- Transfer posting SL to SL -- Placing in Receiving SL
Regards

WM - Storage type 001 is not suitable as an interim storage area -

Hi,
When i'm doing Migo, the blw error has came, pls advise , how solve it..
seems, some where i made wrong config.. These process i was trying in our ides server..
Storage type 001 is not suitable as an interim storage area
Message no. L9022
Diagnosis
You have attempted to execute a posting to a dynamic coordinate in a storage type for which a putaway strategy is defined. Dynamic coordinates, however, are provided only for storage types without a putaway strategy.

thanks Raman
pls tell me now , where i have to check the config.. and where i may did the mistake.
for ur info, ref to sdn A08- conf guide as per blw , i made the conf..
3.1 Full WM Basic Settings
3.1.1 Defining Control Parameters for Warehouse Number
3.1.2 MM-IM Storage Location <-> Warehouse Number J01
3.1.3 Defining Storage Type 001- high rack system
3.1.4 Defining Storage Section 001- Fastmoving
3.1.5 Defining Storage Bin Types P1-BIN HEGIHT 1 MTR
3.1.6 Defining Blocking Reasons 1
3.1.7 Defining Storage Bin Structures
3.1.8 Defining Storage Type Indicators 1
3.1.9 Defining Storage Unit Types E1
3.1.10 Defining Storage Section Indicator 001- Fastmoving
3.1.11 Defining Bulk Storage Indicator B1
3.2 Strategies
3.2.1 Activating Storage Type Search
3.2.2 Activating Storage Section Search
3.2.3 Activating Storage Bin Type Search
3.2.4 Defining Sort Sequence for Putaways (Cross-line Stock Putaway) Definition of Sort Field in Storage Bin
3.2.5 Defining Strategy for Pallets
3.2.6 Defining Putaway Strategy for Bulk Storage
3.2.7 Defining Strategy for Stringent FIFO
3.2.8 Defining Strategy for Large/Small Quantities Determining Search Sequence
3.3 Activities
3.3.1 Defining Requirement Categories
3.3.2 Defining Shipment Types
3.3.3 Defining Movement Types
3.3.4 Defining Stock Transfer and Replenishment Control Defining Replenishment Control for Storage Type
3.3.5 Setting up 2-Step Picking
3.3.6 Defining Confirmation
3.3.7 Print Control
3.3.8 Defining Default Values
3.3.9 Defining Types for Storage Type
3.3.10 Defining Difference and Document Limit
3.3.11 Clearing Difference (Interface with IM) MM-IM Movement Types for Clearing Inventory
3.3.12 Clearing Difference (Interface with IM)  Do Not Allow Clearing in Storage Types
3.4 Interfaces
3.4.1 Allowed Negative Stocks in Interim Storage Types Allowing Negative Stock for Each Storage Type
3.4.2 Shipping Shipping Control per Warehouse Number
3.4.3 Shipping  Requirement Types of Delivery Documents
3.4.4 2-Step Picking
3.4.5 Creating Automatic Transfer Order
3.5 Manual Activities
3.5.1 Maintaining Number Range and Assignment
3.5.2 Maintaining Number Range for Physical Inventory
3.5.3 Creating Storage Bins
3.5.4 Generating Interim Storage Bin
Edited by: UJ on Mar 4, 2009 7:16 AM

User Exit for Put Away for multiple storage type

Hi All ,
we are using the exit EXIT_SAPML03T_002 for doing some capacity calculation and bin selection while doing a put away process in Ware house .
now i want to have two different type of storage types
say
A and B ,
if their are no empty bins in storage type A , then as per storage section search strategy the material should go in B storage type.
Both the storage type has next empty bin search strategy with user exit activated.
The difference between the two storage type is their individual capacity which is maintained in a custom table .
I am facing the problem that the exit is getting triggered only once .
ie. it will check for storage type A if the criteria is not met at a later stage while bin allocation , the system is not triggering the exit for B storage type .
do i need to do all validation and possibilities of not getting placed in storage type A in the exit . or does this exit will trigger for each storage type as per strategy if for any reason the stock is not placed in the previous storage type ?

Hi Experts
Thanks for the response,
As i tested for the 561 movement (initial upload) we need to do the put away manually.
So the system will not suggest Full qty to move to one Bulk and partial to different.
But for normal Goods receipt process the goods will be automatically placed to different storage type
based on the search strategy and in the Bulk structure we need to unchek the partial pallet allowed.
If anybody has difference pls revert
Regards
Depin

Storage Location or Storage type

Hi Experts ,
Here is the complete scenario .....
W1 -- Warehouse1 which has Supplies and Pharma
W2 -- Warehouse 2 which has Supplies and Equipments
W3 -- Warehouse 3 has Pharma only
W1 and W3 are in one Physical structure with partition
W2 is across the road...
1. Supplies move from W2 to W1 when supplies go low in warehouse 1 (W1) this is done almost daily .
2. Supplies from W1 are moved to W2 if there is any overflow or supplies come in excess which happens few times a week.
3. We have 3 shipment points where they perform shipping and receiving each for W1,W2 and W3.
4. we have 6 staging spots for staging of international shipments on W1
 and we have about 10 staging spots in W2 ....We need to know the exat location of where the shipping pallet is located for compliance purpose (Inspection )
5. Most of the receiving is done in W1 (about 85 %) where it is inspected , arranged and then put away is done accordingly ....
 If the shipment contains only equipments or Beds then its received in W2.
6. When there is an overflow of Pharma in W1 then some of the supplies in W1 are removed and put in W2 so that they get space for Pharma storage .....
7. Warehouse 3 (W3) has high value Pharma, basically used for domestic shipments (in US) or the pharma products which dont have space in W1.
8.. Moving of Pharma products for storage from W3 to W1 happens rarely;
9. Moving from W1 to W3 happens almost daily ..cause when ever the products get over in W3 then they move it from W1.
10. Picking for international shipments takes place from W3 and W1 and are shipped from W1 in big Pallets.
11. When they receive the product in Big pallets in W1 some pharma products go to W1 and some in W3 , depending on the value .
12. Some times the domestic Shipments are in large quantity so its taken from W3 to W1 and staged for shipment in W1.
13. Domestic (within US) shipments is done through Fed Ex ....which is done daily ....
My Question is will it be wise to
OPTION 1:make these 3 warehouses into 3 storage locations...(1 plant >3storage locations>1 warehouse )or
OPTION 2: is it wise to make these 3 warehouses into 3 storage types ...... (1plant --->1 storage location --->1 warehouse -
>3 storage types -->1 section under each storage type )
Will there be any problem to define shipping point,carry physical inventory,stock transfers and work with RF devices in future if i choose option 2 
Your Advise is precious to me ....Please do let me know the pros and cons .....for options ..above ....
Regards
Albert

Hello Albert,
It's always suggested to have very simple organization structure so we can avoid extra transaction.
Now in your case, if you define three Plant/SLoc/warehouse then you are going to end up with more and more transactions at inventory level and followed by warehouse transactions.
I suggest to have one Sloc and one warehouse for this kind of organization and maintain different storage type for each physical location. This will reduce the IM level transactions. Now when moving material from one facility to another facility you can maintain one more storage type for the Transport Equipement (i.e. Cart/Forklift etc) so when you move from W1 to W2 at that time you can do bin to bin transfer.
Also you want facility for overflow in one facility so this can be achieved with allowing two storage type for putaway.
for different kind of Supplies and pharma, I am sure you will plan different material type for them so that will help to get reports for each category.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

How to delete the material records related to storage type

Dear SAP guru's,
I got a situation that if the material "XXXXXX" exists in two different storage type (let say 001 & 002 ) and the material needs to be removed out of one (Let say 002) to avoid the picking and putaway in future.
Inorder to accomplish an above requirement we tried the below cases
Case 1: By flagged the material "XXXXXX" under storage type 002 in MM06 transaction.But it didn't restrict the system on allocating and removing the stock from /to to the storage type 002.
Case 2:After we flagged the material for deletion under storage type 002 ,we used to MM71 transaction to archive & delete the material record that assocaited with the storage type 002 completely.
I am kind of queiries to know if there is any other method or procedure available to delete the storage type associated material records in SAP.
Please guide me with the other options.Thanks.
Regards,
John.

Hi John,
Its very simple, remove the Storage type indicators from the material master - Warehouse View 1 at Stock placement & Stock removal section, with this it won't pickup or place the materials in the concerned storage type.
If you have extended this materials to more than 1 storage type, you need to do the same for all the storage types.
Reward if it is helpful.

Limiting Inventory Display of Storage Types within LX02

Hello All,
We are using SAP WM and have a situation where we are contracting with a 3rd party warehouse to hold some raw materials for us. We will have a captive user account that will only permit the employee at the 3rd party warehouse to perform certain restricted transaction codes. In one of the transaction codes that displays WM-based inventory, we want to only have transaction code LX02 - STOCK LIST display only the storage type that represents the inventory at that facility. We have a single WM warehouse that has multiple storage types and have allocated one storage type to represent that 3rd party warehouse location (which really is just an extension of the manufacturing plant). For example, if I have storage types A, B, C, and D within a single WM warehouse, and I have made the decision that C represents the 3rd party location, then I only want to setup SAP security to restrict the 3rd party warehouse employee to be able to only see storage type C and not the others. Can this be done with the proper assignment of security authorizations to allow this? If so, what is the authorization object that controls this?
BTW, we do not want to use a separate WM warehouse or plant to control this as that results in solving the above problem but introduces many other issues and problems.
Thanks!!

Hi,
I checked that report and it uses logical database S1L. If you display documentation for this logical DB in SE36 you will find this section
Authorization checks for the warehouse number take place in the database.
Warehouse number
So it does not seem that tit will work for you. What you can try to do is to enhance LX02 to perform additional authorization check. Using implicit enhancement points you can add code to the beginning of any routine. In this case you could enhance routine call_alv.
Cheers

ECC6.0 WM creation of one TO per Storage Type

Hello,
I'm currently implementing WM at my customer using various Storage Types. During testing we created GR in IM for 2 materials (in one document), one of them is relevant to quality inspection but the other one is not.
TO creation has been done automatically (as expected) from interim storage type 902 GR area) to interim storage type 917 (quality area) for the first position. Also a position for the second line has been created from 902 to storage type 042 (main shelf).
Technically this is all OK. However I was expecting to have 2 TO's instead of 1 TO with 2 positions. How can I trigger the system to create a seperate TO per destination storage type?
Thanks beforehand big time!
Alex

Hi,
It was working at the time I posted...so, please complain at SAP AG...
You can use this link to access online SAP help:
http://help.sap.com/
('SAP R/3 and R/3 Enterprise' - on the left)
E.g.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/e1/8e51341a06084de10000009b38f83b/frameset.htm
(you can use search term 'Transfer order split')
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/c6/f83df24afa11d182b90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Additionally you can use this as well:
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LEWM/MMWM.pdf
BR
Csaba

"control data for storage type is missing"

Hi Guys
I am trying to create a goods receipt for an inbound delivery.
I created the inbound delivery VL31N - sucessfully
But when trying to create a putaway LT0F - error
control data for storage type is missing. msg no. L3006
Do i maiantain this control data for storage type in the Material master?
is there anything Im doing wrong?
Can someone help please.
Thanks in advance for the help.
Ahmad Yahya

Hi,
Check in SPRO > Logistics Execution > Warehouse Management > Master Data > Define storage type, here for your warehouse and storage type check stock placement and stcok removal control is configured.
Regards,
Prabu

Error during Stock movement between two storage type

Dear Friends
How do i move the stock from one storage type to other storage type within a warehouse?
In the material master i have maintained a storage type indicator for automatic storage type determination.
now when i create a TO for moving the stock from the orginal loaction to other location (NOT INTERIM) i am getting an error
Error occurred during storage section search (1740 003)
Message no. L3041
Diagnosis
No storage area search has been defined for this material and this storage type.
Please assist
Thanks

Dear,
Kindly specify the storage section indicator in Material Master - WM view.
Regards,
Sandip

WM- Wrongly triggered storage section in 902 storage type

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for