Workflow and Status tracking

Dear All,
We should implement some kind of WORKFLOW solution to support the business planning process developed in SAP BI Integrated Planning.
We analyzed the Status and Tracking system in SEM-BPS but it is not seems to be the best solution for us and it does not support the Integrated Planning (am I right?).
What are the possible solutions for a workflow based process handling in an Integrated Planning solution and what are the possible (even non SAP) alternatives?
Thanks in advance,
Dezso

Hello Ajay,
When i execute the Web Interface, the following error appears:
Unable to find:http://sdevsapbw:8002/sap/bc/bsp/sap/z100upsyal00001/z100upsyal00001.htm%3Fsap-client
Im not expert in this kind of solutions but our Queries are executed on web.
I have arrived to this project two weeks ago and I tried to execute the queries in my computer and I am unable to do so. The error is the same when executing Web interface for BPS.
I compared me internet settings with another guy and are equal.
Do I have to do any configuration or install any Add-on?
Thanks,
João Arvanas

Similar Messages

ZBUS2032 not shown in workflow and status in SWEL- no receiver entered

I am trying to change an existing workflow(This one has the standard BO- BUS2032 linked). Now I am trying to link the same workflow to a custom BO(ZBUS2032) copied from BUS2032. This custom BO is generated, released, delegated. I have maintained the default values as
Method = DISPLAY and
Attribute = SALESDOCUMENT
Created an entry in SWE2 for ZWBUS2032 with
Object type = ZWBUS2032
EVENT = CREATED
RECEIVER = WS90000014
Receiver call = FM
Receiver FM = SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT
checked the linkage activated checkbox and left the rest AS-IS
In the workflow side,
In the task screen- I added the task number that has (ZBUS2032 and the new method), specified the triggering events and binded, event is green. When I click on Define binding autom. it shows
WIOBJECT_ID = &ZBUS203&
In the actual event
I added the Object type to ZBUS2032 and the event as CREATED, clicked on start condition and specified the SALES document type condition but it doesn't go green.
When I click on the binding, on the right hand side of the new window where the workflow parameters are there, it still shows BUS2032 instead of ZBUS2032
No errors, I activated. When I hit the test, it still shows BUS2032.
When I do the process through front end and check SWEL, it says No receiver entered.
I am new to Workflow. Kindly please advice.
Regards,
Kiran

Hi,
What are you trying to do with the ZBUS2032?
IIf you create a new task that should call a new method (in ZBUS2032), if you enter BUS2032 as object type and then select the method, are you able to see the new method in the selection list? If yes, that would mean that you have delegated the ZBUS2032 properly. (=You have kind of extended the usage of the standard BUS2032 with the new Z-version).
You could also add some new attributes to your ZBUS2032. If you are able to see them in workflow builder or in the workflow log, this would also mean that the delegation has been done properly. (I just hope that you did the subtype in a way that Rick tried to describe).
In general I hope that you have tested your new functionality (method or attribute) directly in SWO1. If it works there, it should then work in the workflow too. I would be interested to know how you came into conclusion that ZBUS2032 is not working as it should? Do you see an error or what?
Regards,
Karri

CRM Workflow and ERP Workflow integration

Hi,
I need to get workflow to work across several modules. One example is that I have some actions that needs to be completed in CRM, and when that has finished I need to trigger a workflow in ERP to continue the processing. How can I send information from the CRM workflow to the ERP workflow, and status message back to CRM? I have been looking at Wf-XML options, but that seems to be across http communication only.. these systems can be on the same server. Can anyone give me some tips on how this can be done? Help is greatly appreciated!
Regards,
Thomas

Hello,
My suggestion is to trigger the events with a RFC of a Function module.
Program the Function module in the ERP system and enable it as RCF function. In this module program the trigger for the prefered object.
In the CRM workflow call a background method of the corresponding object which triggers the Function Module in the ERP system.
Another solution could be that the action which was taken in CRM leads to a replication in the ERP which already triggers a standard event.
Hopefully above guides you to a solution.
Kind regards,
Peter

FM to read the different steps in workflow and the status at each step

Hi All,
Is there any FM in SAP which gives the detail roadmap of the steps taken in a workflow and the diffrent status or decision at each step.
I am looking for something like what you see when you click on the "STARTED WORKFLOW" in the business workplace outbox.
Which shows up the "steps in the process so far " and the decision and the agents for each of them.
Thanks,
Charan.

Hi,
You can get the status according to the task. please check with FM "SAP_WAPI_GET_WI_DELTA".
Regards
SM Nizamudeen

Status Tracking System and IP

Hi,
If one is to implement a brand new planning system using IP (no existing STS), what is the recommended strategy on status tracking?
Thanks,
William Lee

Hello William,
you can also use the old STS from BW 3.5 for integrated planning. But as far as I know there won't be any further progress in this area. SAP is just developing (in cooperation with DSAG) a new STS as replacement. So if you can wait, you should use the new one if it's comming in time
Bye
Frank

Tapeless workflows and Sandy Bridge or other PC's: KISS or LOVE?

Tapeless workflows and Sandy Bridge or other PC's: KISS or LOVE?
Life used to be so simple when shooting video on a tape based camera. You shot your material, captured it for editing and stored your precious original footage on tape in a safe and dry place. Sure, it took time to capture, but the big advantage was that if you had a computer or drive failure, you would still have the original tape so everything could be recreated.
Now with tapeless workflows we have the significant advantage of much faster import of the original footage. Connect the flash card or disk drive to the computer over USB and copy the data to a HDD on the computer, ready for editing. The data on the flash card or disk drive can then be erased, so you can reuse it for more shots. But, like Johan Cruyff has said repeatedly, every advantage has its drawback. In this case it simply means that you no longer have the original material to fall back on, in case of computer or drive failures. That is a very unpleasant and insecure feeling.
The easy anwser to that problem is backups. Backup of the original media, backup of projects and backup of exports. This often means a bundle of externals for backup or NAS configurations. One thing is clear, it requires discipline to make regular backups and it costs time, as well as a number of disks. Four as a minimum: 1 for media, 1 for exports and at least 2 for projects. Note: This is excluding a backup drive for OS & programs.
There are different backup strategies in use. Some say backup daily and use one disk for monday, one for tuesday, and so on. Others say one disk for the first backup, the second for the second backup, then the first again for an incremental backup, etc. and once weekly a complete backup on a third disk. Whatever you choose, be aware that shelf live of a disk is far less than tape. There are horror stories everywhere about ball-bearings getting stuck after some time and without original tapes, you better be safe than sorry, so don't skimp on backups.
What is the relevancy of all this? I thought this was about Sandy Bridge and other PC's.
It is and let me try to explain.
Card based cameras are for the most part DSLR and AVCHD type cameras, and we all know how much muscle is required to edit that in a convenient way. Adobe suggests in the system requirements to use raid configurations for HD editing and practice has shown that raid arrays do give a significant performance boost and improve responsiveness, making for a nicer editing experience. The larger the project and the longer the time-line, the more a raid array will help maintain the responsiveness.
One thing you would not do is using a raid0 for projects, media and exports, even if you have backups. The simple reason is that the chance of disk failure multiplies by the number of disks in the raid0. Two disks double the chance of disk failure, three disks triple the chance, four disks quadruples the chance, etc.
Remember: Disaster always strikes when it is most inconvenient.
Imagine you have been working all day on a project, you decide to call it a day and to make your daily backup, but then the raid fails, before you made your backup. Gone is all of today's work. Then take into consideration the time and effort it takes to restore your backups to the state it was in yesterday. That does not make you happy.
Another thing to avoid is using a software or mobo based parity raid, for the simple reason that it is slooowww and puts a burden on the CPU, that you want to use for editing, not house keeping.
For temporary or easily recreated files, like the page-file, media cache, media cache database and preview files, it is very much advised to use a raid0. It makes everything a lot snappier and if disaster strikes, so what? These are easily recreated in a short time.
This was a general overview of what is required with tapeless workflows. Now let's get down to what this means in terms of system design.
Two approaches or train of thoughts
KISS: Keep it stupidly simple or LOVE: Laughing over video editing
The first one, the most economic one, is to use a system with 3 or 4 disks internally and 4 or more backup disks.
A typical disk setup can look like this:
This is a perfectly sensible approach if one does not have large or complex projects, long time-lines and is willing to take the risk of occasionally losing a whole days work, between backups. Many hobbyists and consumers fall in this category.
The KISS approach keeps it stupidly simple. The drawback is that there is no logical way to add more disks or storage. The discipline, diligence and effort required for regular backups make it far from a laughing matter. In fact it can quickly become a bore. Add to that the fact that the disk setup is simple but not very fast, so less suited for situations where lots of clips are involved, multi-cam is a regularly recurring situation or lots of video tracks are involved.
A number of video editors want more from their system than the occasional platonic KISS, they want to really LOVE their system, which lead to the other train of thought.
This is more costly than the KISS approach, but you all know a fiancée or wife is more costly and dear than the occasional kiss on the cheek by an old friend.
Let's start with a typical disk setup. It may look like this:
Two striking differences in comparison to the KISS approach:
1. Much easier disk organization and more disks and thus more space.
2. It requires a hardware raid controller, causing a higher investment cost. It is like an engagement ring. You don't get LOVE for free, one of the guiding principles of the oldest trade in the world.
These are easy statements to make, but what are the benefits or advantages, that you would fall in LOVE with such a system, and what are the drawbacks? Think back to Johan Cruyff's adage.
The only drawback is cost. The advantages are multiple, easier organization, more speed, more storage, snappier editing, no jerkiness, lesser requirements for regular backups and - this is the major benefit - hardly a chance of losing a day's work in case of a drive failure. Keep in mind that a parity raid keeps all your data intact in case of a drive failure, so lessens the need for up-to-date backups.
We all know, we get what we pay for: "If you pay peanuts, you get monkeys. OTOH, if you pay money to monkeys, you get rich monkeys". But in this case you get what you pay for, a much better editing experience with a much easier workflow.
Using a parity raid (be it raid 3/5/6/30/50/60) you get security, ease of mind that you are protected against losing precious media, that you need not worry about the last time you made a backup, that the editing you did today may be lost and you save valuable time editing and a lot of aggravation because of a much more responsive system.
How does this all relate to Sandy Bridge and other PC's?
First of all, the price difference between a Sandy Bridge / P67 platform and an i7-950+ / X58 platform is very small. Of course the new architecture is slightly more expensive than the older one, but the differences are small, almost not worth talking about.
So what are the differences? Look below:
The first thing to keep in mind is that the Sandy Bridge is the successor of the i7-8xx CPU and as such it is much more evolutionary than revolutionary. The CPU power has increased significantly over the i7-8xx due to new architecture and a smaller production process (32 nm), but in essence all the capabilities have remained unchanged. Same memory, same PCI-e lanes, same version, same L3 cache and no support for dedicated raid controllers.
It is great that the processor performs much better than the older i7-8xx CPU's, almost achieving the level of the i7-9xx range of processors, but is still limited:
The Sandy Bridge is unsuitable for anything more than a KISS system.
Why? Because it lacks the required PCI-e lanes to accomodate more than a 16 x PCI-e nVidia card with CUDA support to enable hardware MPE acceleration and the integrated graphics are not supported by CS5.
You may wonder if that is a bad thing. The plain and simple anser is NO. It is a great processor, it delivers great value for money, is a solid performer, but it has its limitations. Intel had a reason to position this CPU as a mid-level CPU, because that is what it is, a mid-level performer in comparison to what is to come.
The term mid-level performer may seem strange when compared to the old generation of i7-9xx CPU's, because they perform almost equally well, but keep in mind that there is a generation difference between them.
So what about the i7-9xx and X58 platform?
It still is going strong. About the same performance as a Sandy Bridge, with only the much more expensive hexa-cores clearly in the lead, both performance and price wise. The quad cores deliver about the same value for money. The main difference however is the platform that allows a dedicated raid controller to be installed, thus making it the platform of choice for those who want to go from a passing KISS to true LOVE.
And what lies ahead?
Sandy Bridge E on the Waimea platform (X68). Now that is revolutionary. More than double almost everything a processor can offer: double the cores, double the PCI-e lanes, triple the memory, more than double the L3 cache, increase the PCI-e support from 2.0 to 3.0, etc...
This is why Intel calls this a high-end CPU / platform.
So what now?
If you prefer a KISS approach, choose either a Sandy Bridge/P67 or an i7-950+/X58 platform.
If you wonder whether in the future you may need multi-cam more frequently, edit more complex projects and longer timelines or even progress to RED, look at KISS/LOVE solutions, meaning the i7-950+/X58.
If you can't have downtime, time pressure is high, delivery dates to clients are critical or you edit highly complex projects, lots of multi-cam situations or lengthy time-lines, choose a LOVE solution, an i7-950+/X58 platform.
If you have the time to wait till Q4/2011, Sandy Bridge E/Waimea looks to be worth the wait.
Hope this gives you some more insight into recent and future developments and helps you make wise investment decisions.

I'm upgrading from an AMD 3800+, cutting with Vegas 7 Pro. Usually shoot DSLR or HDV, sometimes P2, EX or RED. I have ridiculously cheap access to Macs, FCP/FCS, all kinds of software.
I've been agonizing over this for the last month, was originally hoping the UD7 mobo was the solution, read the read about the NF200/PCIe issue a few days ago, http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/non-linear-editing-pc/489424-i7-980x-now-wait-sandybridge-2.ht ml- and still decided to go for a 2600k.
My preference is to treat my video footage the same way as my digital imagery: I make (at least) duplicate back ups of everything before reformatting the cards, never delete the back ups, and only worry about the day-to-day stuff at night. Unless I'm rendering or involved in other long processes, in which case I'll back up the work in process the next day. If I am under a really really tight deadline I might back up as I go.
Yes, a RAID might make it easier, but I'm paranoid enough to prefer a slower, safer backup. You can always duplicate, and usually improve upon, a days work, but you can never get back original footage you lost. I have only ever had one hard drive die on me (a few enclosures crapped out, though)- it took a couple of (mostly unattended) hours to rectify. As a matter of act, I've had far more loss/damage from tapes than from hard drives.
I ordered the UD7, 2 F4s and 4 F3Rs, understanding I will probably want to upgrade to SBE when it comes out, or maybe next year. The 2600k/mobo/RAM will likely hold its value better than a 950/X58, likely because of the marketplace as much as merit.
The UD7 / RAID card issue is in it's early days, there may be a solution/mitigation. Probably not. But if I really really need a RAID card, then I probably really really need a 980, NAS, etc etc.
But Harm still rocks!

Workflow Internal Status: Cancelled

Dear All,
We have a SharePoint/Project Server 2013 Enterprise Edition and Sharepoint Designer deployment in HYPER V virtual environment. We are using it for Project Management. We are facing an issue while designing a workflows in SharePoint
designer 2013.
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION:
“Workflow Internal Status: Cancelled
" ERROR:
RequestorId: 7b51f972-22ad-faa7-a60a-20f365bff1e3. Details: System.ApplicationException: HTTP 500 {"SPRequestGuid":["7b51f972-22ad-faa7-a60a-20f365bff1e3"],"request-id":["7b51f972-22ad-faa7-a60a-20f365bff1e3"],"X-FRAME-OPTIONS":["SAMEORIGIN"],"SPRequestDuration":["116"],"SPIisLatency":["0"],"MicrosoftSharePointTeamServices":["15.0.0.4481"],"X-Content-Type-Options":["nosniff"],"X-MS-InvokeApp":["1;
RequireReadOnly"],"Date":["Tue, 24 Dec 2013 19:28:11 GMT"],"Server":["Microsoft-IIS\/7.5"],"X-Powered-By":["ASP.NET"]} at Microsoft.Activities.Hosting.Runtime.Subroutine.SubroutineChild.Execute(CodeActivityContext
context) at System.Activities.CodeActivity.InternalExecute(ActivityInstance instance, ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager bookmarkManager) at System.Activities.Runtime.ActivityExecutor.ExecuteActivityWorkItem.ExecuteBody(ActivityExecutor executor, BookmarkManager
bookmarkManager, Location resultLocation) "
Workflow stage status: Workflow is still in processing please refresh the page and try again
After configuring the workflow in SharePoint designer followed below mentioned TechNet blog to go through the workflow designing
URL: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/jj163494.aspx
As in the blog project Event is set to when project is submitted, we tried a lot to submit the project but submit button was grayed out and unable to do this, then we changed to event
when project is committed from that above mentioned errors are occurred. Moreover we have tried to make simpler workflow but same result.
Detailed Description:
Installation of Workflow Manager 1.0
Installation of Service Bus and CU1
Start App Management Service (Also Configured in Managed Service App)
Start User Profile Service (Also Configured in Managed Service App)
Run the full user profile sync and Completed
Created the workflow using domain user account and assigned him proper permission
Thanks in Advance
REGARDS DANISH DANIE

If the workflow initiator does not have write access to the hidden Workflow History List, the same error happens.
To solve the issue, simply open the hidden list permission (through SharePoint Designer>All Files>Lists, for example) and make sure to have your potential initiators contribute rights. The list defaultly inherits the site's permissions.
kirtesh

Workflow Error status in checking In records (Records still getting syndicated to Port)

Hi Experts,
I have syndication strencil step before stop (check in) step.
After successfully syndication of records to respective ports when i see status of workflow it is going in Error state.
When i checked history of workflow then in last check in step it is giving error "insufficient right to checkin".
Owner for workflow is defined as "WFOWNER", which is specialy defined which do not have modify access to record and can see all workflow's status in workflow tab.
Below are the permissions this role is having which include checkin owned and no-owned records also.
Appreciate your comments!!
Thanks

Hi Ravi,
Thanks for promp reply.
I already have tried this option, but no luck... :-( .
Its still showing "insufficient right to checkin" in last stop check in step.
I did 1 testing that i want to share. I tried with only 3 steps, start -> syndication step -> stop and kept same owner of this workflow " WFOWNER". I got completed status with no error.
I was thinking that problem is with WFOWNER id or syndication step, but after this testing i am not sure where is the problem.
Thanks
Nitish Sharma

IDOC Status, Tracking in SAP PI/PO Single Stack

Hi All,
My PO version: 7.4, SP4. I am not sure my questions below are still a limitation in current PI/PO single stack systems, and hence requesting your help for the same.
1) Is there a way we can track outbound idocs in SAP PI/PO single stack similar to PI abap stack IDX5? ( Note:- I couldn't find any option in IDOC monitoring in single stack SAP PO 7.4, SP4)
2) IDOC status is always 0 in SAP PO 7.4 single stack IDOC monitoring. I am not sure if this status is just specific to my PO system. Any setting needs to be applied?
ps: Please post only relevant answers/solutions
Thanks,
Praveen Gujjeti
Message was edited by: Praveen Gujjeti

Hi All,
As per SAP help: Comparison of IDoc Adapter (IE) and IDoc Adapter (AAE) - SAP NetWeaver PI Reference Documentation - SAP Library idoc status and tracking not supported in current PO versions. May be SAP will add this feature in upcoming PO versions
Auditing, Monitoring ,and Tracing Functions
Attribute/Feature
IDoc Adapter (IE)
IDoc Adapter (AAE)
ALE Audit
Supported
Supported
IDoc tracing
Supported (transaction IDX5)
Not supported
IDoc monitoring
Transaction IDX5
Integration with channel monitor and message monitor (as part of Advanced Adapter Engine monitor)
Status tracking -SYSTAT
(analysis and further processing of messages that have not been processed)
Not supported
Not supported
RFC monitoring
Supported
Not supported
Message persistence in the IDoc adapter
Supported
Message correlation information can be stored in IDoc adapter.
Not supported.
Message is persisted in messaging system with correlation data persisted in adapter.
Regards,
Praveen Gujjeti

SAP Workflow and GRC 10.1 Workflow

Hi all,
We are in the midst of upgrading our GRC system up to 10.1 and some questions are coming up about the workflows. In short are GRC workflows and SAP workflows the "same thing", i.e. if someone outside of the upgrade project were to learn how to create/maintain workflows within GRC 10.1 would they be able to turn around and run the same transactions within an ECC 6.0 environment and create SAP Business workflows? From what I have seen so far in my searching is that, they have the same basic principle but very different implementation/maintenance.
Any documentation that you are aware of from SAP showing this would be helpful as well.
Thanks

The basic mechanism is the same, but the GRC workflows are more fixed (they leave less room for the workflow to be changed) have build in screens, and relay on the BRF engine to determine approvers etc.
Workflows in the ECC give you a lot more room for implanting the workflow however you wish (use a decision task, asynchronous tasks, develop your own custom approval screen etc.) and some time required you to implement changes to the workflow object (set a user status, release a document etc.) and don't usually use the BRF.
So I would have to say that the answer is no, someone who learned how to implement the GRC workflows will not be able to turn around and immediately create workflows in the ECC.

Diffrences Between SAP HR workflow and SAP Logistics workflow

Hello All,
Do we need to do any specific configuration settings to be done in the system to work on SAP HR workflow in ECC 6.0?
I am using SWU3 for automatic workflow customizing? But I am getting error indicator for u201CCheck Entries from HR Control Tablesu201D in the Maintain Definition Environment Node.
Are there any major differences between SAP HR workflow and SAP Logistics Workflow?
Regards
Venkat

Hi Mike,
what can be the impact if Check Entries from HR Control Tables setting are not maintain in the System. caz my workflow is going in waiting status and when i have chacked the container for that element then there in _Workitem.ExecuteByUser-ID is coming as <NOT SET>.
So can you please put some light on this.. that what can be the resion behind this ...?
Is this a Check Entries from HR Control Tables Problem or any other reason..
Thanks & regards
Dev

How can a Workflow get status CANCELLED

Hello,
We have the following situation.
A workflow shows status CANCELLED in the BBP_PD. All other information of the Workflow is gone in this trx!
Via the trx. SCOT we can see the workitem mail were send to the approval agents.
The question we have is:
1. Under what circumstances a Workflow can get status CANCELLED?2.
2. How can we analize, using the Workflow tools, what happened in the Workflow BEFORE it got cancelled? Did it reach the for instance the agents to get approved?
Thanks for any clue.
Aart

Hi,
Please go to transaction BBP_PD, open the document and find the workitem ID.
Display the workitem in SWI1 transaction. You see the worklfow log.
Regards,
Masa

Workflow - RFC Status -- User is locked

Hi , experts
I prepared a workflow and tested it with   PFTC_DIS transaction.
there was no problem .But when i trigered this workflow event in my program , workflow not worked. I used SWEL and SWELS programs to traced it.
The list is below.
The problem is "RFC Status = User is locked. Please notify the person responsible".
Please help.
Regards
Aysenur
SWEL -Display event trace
Event Instance ID    145008
Object Type          ZBUS_Z
Object Key           1000001999
Event                   OKEY
Event Creator        US DX          DX
Creation Time        26.02.2007 15:43:24 ZET
Receiver Type        WS98000099
Object Key
Receiver FM           SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT_IBF
RFC Destination      WORKFLOW_LOCAL_240
Check FM
Receiver Type FM
Trace Date/Time      26.02.2007 15:43:24 ZET
User Name             DX DX
Main Program         ZTR_XX
Action                    Receiver started correctly
RFC Status            User is locked. Please notify the person responsible

Hi,
Your workflow is not configured properly. Transaction SWU3 -> Configure RFC destinations, hit generate. You may well lack the authorization, in which case you will need a basis person to help you.
Hope that helps,
Mike

BPS - Status & Tracking

Hello,
I am using status & tracking for planning.
I have configured the tracking as per the how to document, assigned users for each level, the time for planning etc.
But the problem is even after the specified time the user is able to edit data although the the sheets should be locked.
Also once any user is submitted the sheets, ideally it should get locked but still he can reopen it and work on the sheet.
Probably I am missing something. Could anybody please tell what needs to be done for locking the sheets.
Regards
Vanya

Hi,
   We also had a similar situation and we realised that the following has to be done :
   Under STS Customisation (txn.: BPS_TC), you need to define the header characteristics (this is under the radio button - "Define header Chars forPlanning Session"). Here we had to define the Sub Plan and the Planning Round as selection criteris. What we experienced prior to providing this was that it was possible to change the budget/Plan figures even after the budget was approved. Providing this in the selection criteria helped in the "locking" of a Cost Center budget figures(STS uses the Sub Plan together with the Cost center for locking purposes)
   Try this if it works .
Thanks and best regards
Bala.

Shipping status tracking in B2B with out XSI

Hi Gurus,
We are implementing the the standard B2b application with ECC6.0 as the backend.
We are not using XSI fuctionality in ECC to get the information of the shipping status.
But they still get the the tracking number (VL02n) in to the ECC. Now We need to get this Information Into B2B shop for status tracking.
Do we need to XSI to be enabled to bring the tracking Information into B2B?
How can we do this with out XSI?
Can we still use the tables TCAURL , TCAVAR with out creating the Express Delivery companny.
If this need total customization can some one run me through the steps on how we can achive this.
Thank You.

Hi,
When you tracking number, I hope you mean the Airway Bill Number or Bill of Lading that is seen in transaction "Edit Delivery" vl02n.
The display of the delivery number is a standard feature of the B2B Webshop. This will be displayed at the item level.
However, the bill of lading to be displayed is not standard. There is development required in both, ABAP and JAVA (ISA) level.
We had implemented this in CRM ISA, so we had to use a Custom FM (RFC) by using a standard BAPI to return the Airway Bill Number when it was provided the delivery number as the input.
Further, the JAVA web page that displays the order status has to be modified to call your custom RFC.
This is the basic path for the solution.
Regards,
Nelson.

Workflow and Status tracking

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for