Workflow condition to check error records in a multi line container element

Hi All,
My requirement is to change a standard workflow in which below condtion is checked and subsequent action is taken.
The condtion checks a return internal table contains a row or not. Now the problem is for success and Information messages
also the return table contains entries and the condition is becoming true. Subsequently workflow follows error recovery steps when there is no error.
SAP suggests a note with manual corrections and mentions to change the condition to check whether error records are there. So can we enhance the condition &return& NX to something that it checks error records. I dont want to create a new step and go to business object method to delete non error records.
Please let me know if this condition can be enhanced.
Thanks in Advance.
Aleem Mohiuddin.

Dear Aleem,
As this is sap standard workflow, should report this error and wait for feed back. Or add a loop step before of this check any E messages inside, if yes put a errflg as x other wise keep as blank.
Best of luck.
Regards,
Ranjith

Similar Messages

  • Cost Center Error in Shopping cart Multi Line items

    Hi,
    We are working on SRM 4.0. when the user is trying to create a shopping cart from catalog he gets the error message as
    "you don't have the acces to the cost object xyz12.please return to the cost assignment section and correct".
    We have given the access to that cost center in SRM even also he is getting the same error. 
    He does not have any problem with single line item against the same cost center. problem gets only when he is going to create with multiple line items in shopping cart against the same cost center.
    Request all  please advise me where i need to check to overcome the issue.
    Regards,
    Sri

    Hi,
    Thanks for your kind response. can you please elaborate bit more  step by step.
    Awaiting for your feedback.
    Regards,
    sri

  • DTP - Error Records

    Hi All,
        Request you to please assist me in handling the error stack.
    Here is the scenario..
    There were error records in the DTP...i have corrected the errors in the error stack.
    Now, i need to know how to go about to post these error records.
    Thanks
    Hari

    Hi
    need to perform to handle data records with errors:
    Failed status of DTP in DTP Process Monitor because of invalid character in records.
    By clicking on Error Stack we can check error records.
    Total of 3 records with error in source data.
         correcting erroneous records in Error Stack by clicking edit button on top left.
    Creating Error DTP from the update tab of standard DTP. 
    Once Error DTP gets created, we can check the status of Standard DTP which is changed from create to display, and can also check the Error DTP under the Object for which we created the standard DTP.
    Here is Error DTP:
         Schedule the Error DTP from Execute tab.
         In the Error DTP process monitor itu2019s showing 3 records that we corrected in Error Stack in earlier steps.
         We can also check the status of Standard DTP, itu2019s also Green now (without errors).
         You can also check the records updated status of Standard and Error DTP in the manage tab of data target.

  • Is it possible to update a checked out record in a workflow?

    Hi All,
    I want to join a checked out records in a workflow with a updated record.. I am getting the following error:
    Import failed. Cannot import record because it is already in a workflow or is already checked out by another user
    Import action: Update (All Mapped Fields)Source record no: 2
    I have created a workflow with validations in it.. and they are failed and the records are held in that workflow.. Now I want to update those records with another import.. I am unable to join that check out records in the workflow..
    Any inputs.
    Thanks
    Rajeev
    Regards.
    Rajeev

    Hi Rajeev,
    Yes we can not import the records which are in an Workflow your import fails.
    As ravi suggested Auto join checked out records will work only when the user who checked out and the importing user are same.. but if you are trying to update the record which is checked out by another user you can not be able to update that record.
    Why are the records which are failed in the other workflow are checked out? any reason.
    when you design the worflow for validating a record are you using validation step or branch step ?
    You should use branch step on default condition you should have an assginment(for stating some field in the repository as Error so that you can trace how many records failed) and another stop step which will check in\rollback those values.
    So your records will be in check in after the first workflow is processed.....  and you can proceed with your import then.
    Let me know whether i understand your problem or not, if i am wrong please let me know the complete scenario which you want to achieve.
    regards
    Sowseel

  • Check Out Records through Workflow

    Hi
    I want to Check Out records that are added through Import Mgr untill they are reviewed and approved. However, if i enable "Check Out Records" for Start activity and select "Action on Records" as "Check In" for Stop activity - the Workflow fails to launch giving an error message "Not yet implemented".
    How do i achive this functionality?
    Regards,
    Anoop

    No way to checkin/checkout records from a non-main table.
    This would not be logical. When you check out a record from a flat table and it is used as a lookup value somewhere in the main table, so what to do with such a situation? Checkout the corresponding main table recordt? This would be rather confusing.
    In other words, it is quite a question how to handle checkin/checkout for records that are used somewhere else.
    There is no such problem for the main table records - they can never be lookup values and no record in a repository can depend on them.
    So, no way to checkout records from a flat table.

  • Portal check out record does not check in when MDM workflow is active

    Hi Experts,
    We are using portal as front end for the MDM material creation/update.
    when a user tries to edit a material via portal, the record is checked out in mdm and once the record update is done and submitted that particular record will be checked in. this is normal process and automatic in nature till date.
    However, we have created a simple workflow in mdm, we havent checked out records in start step of workflow.
    So it normally executes without check out /in via MDM Workflow.
    workflow triggerring action = record import, record update, record add.
    when i edit the material vai data manager WF triggers fine and all is well.
    However when i edit the material via portal, record is checked out (which is normal) and once record is submitted, the workflow in mdm is triggered successfully.
    Workflow ends with all necessary syndication's and validations and ends successfully, But after this the record still remains as checked out? ???
    ideally as mentioned above (in bold) once the user completes editing the record and submits it, the record should be checked in, but this is not happening!!!
    Please let me know why is this happening.
    Please help.
    Regards
    Eva

    Hi Eva,
    That is useful.
    Analyzing this issue I came across SAP note 1740194-Record remains in exclusive lock after workflow is completed.This was an issue observed in SAP MDM 7.1 SP08.
    It gives a workaround -
    The workaround is:
    The owner of updating has to click on the modified record in Data Manager after workflow completed. The original modified record will be unlocked.
    Ofcourse,resolution would require an upgrade.
    Thanks,
    Ravi

  • We have three discussions forums with same subject. whenever a post gets new reply in one forum, it should automatically trigger workflow functionality to check conditions and send the same reply to other synchronized forums.

    we have three discussions forums with same subject. whenever a post gets new reply in one forum, it should automatically trigger workflow functionality to check conditions and send the same reply to other synchronized forums.
    Rajiv Kumar

    Hi,
    More details about your discussions forum will make others easier to find a corresponding solution on your requirement.
    If you mean there are three Discussion Board list waiting for synchronizing, I would suggest you create an Event Receiver for the three Discussion Board list.
    Here is a link with code demo about how to copy items from one Discussion Board to another including Replies:
    http://spcodes.blogspot.com/2013/03/programmatically-copy-items-from-one.html
    Here is a step by step sample on creating a simple Item added event receiver for Custom List in SharePoint 2010:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff398052.aspx
    More information on Event Receiver for your reference:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg749858(v=office.14).aspx
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff408183(v=office.14).aspx
    Feel free to reply if there are still any questions. 
    Best regards
    Patrick Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Result recording(QM) - Status check error

    Hi Friends,
    I can not perform Result recording(QE01) due to "status Check Error".
    Inspection lot was created through GR. And then i tried to do Result recording. But i am getting error "status check error-This function you selected cannotbe carried out".
    Appreciate your help.
    Thanks

    hi
    If no Inspection Plan is found,
    1. Inspection Plan is not available. Check in QP03 for the material/plant combination the availability of plan. If not available, create it using QP01.
    2. The date of creation of Plan is later that date of creation of Inspection Lot. In this case, in QA02 give the key date as before the date of creation of plan.
    Next, you can do the Result Recording (from QA32 screen or use QE51N)
    Once all results are entered and saved, the status become INSP.
    Now, do the Usage Decision (QA32 / QA11) and here give the acceptace code and post the stock into Unrestricted stock
    regards
    kunal

  • FRM-40506: Oracle error: unable to check for record uniqueness

    Hello everyone
    I have an emergency problom. the context is:
    I have a master -detail structure in a form. first, my detail is a tabulation view, so it has severals records. Then, when i try to commit the form ii received the message <<<FRM-40506: Oracle error: unable to check for record uniqueness>>.
    i made a test by changing the detail block presentation to Form. and i could save because my detail has one record.
    Could someone has any idea how can I save my master-detail form with severals records in my detail.
    Master
    [code_p] [non_P]
    Detail
    [code_p] [product1]
    [code_p] [product2]
    [code_p] product3]
    [code_p] [productn]
    thanks!

    Error Cause:
    Processing error encountered while checking a record's primary key items for uniqueness. The table associated with the current block of the form does not exist, or you do not have authority to access the table.
    You can review the error documentation:
    http://www.errorpro.com/oracleerrors/oraerror.php?level1=Oracle&send=Send&ecode=FRM-40506&Submit=Search

  • Workflow Condition Step Failing

    Hi All,
    I am facing a very peculiar error.
    I have two outcomes modelled  depending on a varible (Material Type) in the worklfow.
    My workflow gets triggered when I push SUBMIT button on my ADOBE interactive form on ABAP Web Dynpro launcehd
    from UWL. Now if i check the workflow container, the variable is set properly. But still the condition fails. A backgorund task
    having import parameters as Owrkflow container elements fails with an exception even though the import parameters are set.
    But yes, again the workflow container same elements can be displayed on any form in further steps by reading the container
    from ABAP webDynpro launched from UWL. Peculiar !!!
    The same workflow works fine if I directly set the variables and test the workflow.
    Why this ?..... Any Idea.... ? If something is written on to the workflow container can the workflow work on those variables ?
    Please suggest.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Deb

    Hi Rick,
    Thanks for your suggestions. Actually we could solve it ina different way. It was a nice but tricky error in muy coding.
    Here is what I was doing:
    1)  I tirgger my workflow on click of 'SUBMIT' button on my ADOBE interactive in AWD
    2) Then I get the instance of the workflow to get the Workflow Work Item ID
    3) Now I write the form data to the workflow container.
    Note: By the time I write to my container, my workflow had been already triggered, with the condition step at the 1st.
             And the container is not yet written, hence the condition fails.
    Solution:  I used a wait step. And Read the workflow container in loop untill the container elements are populated.
                   Once out of this loop, I now tirgger the write to the container and raise the wait event.
    Cheers !!
    Deb

  • Auditing the Error Records

    How can I audit the bad records that are getting rejected from the target table. ie) i want to store the bad records rejected out to a separate table.
    i tried checking it out in the wb_rt_error_sources table in runtime repository, but it holds only the error column name and its value. i want to hold the entire record.
    Thanking in Anticipation,
    Amudha

    Amudha,
    There are two main methods of dealing with the error records:
    1. If the error records are violating key constraints, you can configure the target object (right-click on the the mapping, select configure and expand the sources and targets configuration, constraints section). You must put the constraints to false, so that OWB will disable the constraints during the load (and you will have better performance) and re-enable them after the load. The records violating the target table constraints will appear in the runtime audit error table as well as in the exceptions table, if you specify one.
    2. If you can detect the error condition with a filter, a lookup table etc., you can channel them through a splitter operator to a target table that will contain the erroneous rows.
    Regards:
    Igor

  • Workflow problem during import of record

    Hi,
    We get the following error message during import of a record using import manager:
    4868 2008/05/05 15:12:44.861   Error: RC: 0x80000002  
    4868 2008/05/05 15:12:44.861   Error: Failed to GetJoinCheckOutRights. [Owner: WF Owner; Job Id: 10165]
    Currently we run MDM 5.5 SP6 Patch 2. This worked fine before we applied patch 2.
    The record is getting checked out in the start step. If I don't check out the record it's working fine.
    Any ideas?
    BR
    Michael

    Hi Michel,
    In the start step of Workflow there is an option as check out records(yes,no). select yes, when record will enter into the workflow it will get check out and no user will be able to modify that record throughout the workflow cycle.I you want that the record shoukd be modyfied at some step during workflow then you have to give rights (Join CheckOut )to the user of that Particular step.For That login with the user which is the Owner  of the workflow now rightclick onthe record or records and check in\out->Modify Join Permissions->either add a user or a role.This will allow that added user to Join check out and modify the Record(right clik on record ->join check out).Then that User will be able to modify the records.
    Reward if Helpfull.
    With Regards,
    Vinay Yadav

  • Correct workflow condition syntax?

    Which of these two workflow conditions is correct?
    a)      (Left([<Owner>], 3) = "952")
    or
    b)     (Left([<Owner>], 3) = 952")
    Both check out as far as syntax is concerned. b) was in place up until a few minutes ago, but I'm wondering whether conditions like it throw off workflow actions by acting on the value of PRE('Owner') instead of the one that's been changed.

    We have workflows in place that are designed to assign an account to a book based on the first 3 characters of the value updated in the Owner field. For example, if the owner is 953000, the workflow action should assign the account to the 953 book.
    What appears to be happening is that it's being assigned to a Book that matches the 3-character string associated with the PREVIOUS owner. For example. I have a record whose owner is 174000. If I set the owner to 953000, the Book designation remains unchanged. If I then set the owner to 999999, the Book designation then changes to the 953 book.

  • What's the Failure Conditions about Check Datastore in a package?

    I want to perform static control on Datastores, below is the steps:
    To insert a Check step in a package:
    1. Open the package and go to the Diagram tab.
    2. Select the datastore to add to the package from the tree view.
    3. Drag and drop the datastore into the diagram. A datastore Step will appear.
    4. Double-Click on the step icon in the diagram. The properties panel opens.
    5. In the General tab, fill in the Name field. Select Check Datastore/Model in the Step Type.
    6. If you want to remove errors from the checked tables, check Delete ... from checked Tables.
    7. In the Options tab, set the specific KM options. (in this case CKM Oracle is defined in model)
    8. In the Advanced tab, define the processing after success/failure options (See Diagram).
    9. Click Apply to save.
    If constraints on the datastore are violated , I think next step is the failure step, but in fact after the success step runs.
    I can see the error record by right click the datastore control>error.
    So how can lead the next step to failure step if constraints on the datastore are violated?

    Hi Saravanan Rajavel
    Thanks for your proposals.I think it is one way that customize CKM to solve the problem.
    But how to understand "Failure conditions" said in "Oracle Data Integrator User's Guide" as below:
    =============================================
    Failure Conditions
    The table below details the conditions that lead a step to a Failure state. In other situations, the
    steps ends in a Success state.
    Step Type | Failure conditions
    Check Datastore, Model or Sub-Model Error in a the check process
    =============================================
    Can we let the step failure if there are recoreds violate the constrains in datastore? Let the check process looks like error.

  • Error Record in report

    Hello ,
    I have a issue on Report that is Developed on a Multiprovider .
    Problem : There is a report on multiprovider . Multiprovider consist of DSO and Infocube .
    Before Changes : There is a error record in the CRM tables which is fetched by Infopackage . record was like "Number"
                                  The quotes needs to be removed . Through DTP (FULL) data supplied to DSO .
    After Changes : The Error records get corrected .Now till PSA record is fine .DTP is FULL to DSO .
    But when i am reporting on that Multiprovider that error record is still there in the report and corrected record is also there .
    Please help.
    Thanks ,
    Rahul

    Hi Rahul,
    Did you delete your earlier request (the one containing the error record) from the PSA before executing the DTP?
    You can follow the below steps now to correct your data ->
    1. Delete all data from DSO.
    2. Check the PSA, delete all other requests except the latest one.
    3. Load data from PSA to DSO by DTP.
    Hope this helps!
    Regards,
    Saurabh

Maybe you are looking for

  • What cable do I need for a mac mini with this monitor

    I want a mac mini for christmas, I have a monitor but it only supports VGA, so what cable do i need to get a mac mini up and running on this monitor Thanks

  • Can I use a gift card to make a purchase on iTunes on my iPod?

    I can't access iTunes store on my windows 7 pc since the last iTunes update and I'd like to make a purchase with a gift card. Can I do this on my iPod touch?

  • Apple Flags in Full Screen Mode?

    I'm probably missing this somehow.... but can one apply a flag or color label when in full screen mode?

  • Shared services unavailable after config of 11.1.2.1

    Hi all, An environment of 11.1.2.1 has been installed and configured. I have been asked to look at it as workspace was not working. I redeployed foundation and re configured the web server and this resolved that issue. However, the admin user could n

  • Drivers for the dv6-1330ep

    i am trying to see the drivers of this laptop: http://support.hp.com/us-en/drivers/selfservice/HP-Pavilion-dv6-1300-Entertainment-Notebook-PC-series/3999443/model/4058640#Z7_3054ICK0KGTE30AQO5O3KA30R1and the page loads more than 10 minutes and nothin