Workflow Manger 1.0 failed.

Hi,
I am trying to install Workflow Manager 1.0. Installed successfully, but configuration is failed, getting following error.
Add Host to workflow manager and configuration steps failed. Please help.

Hi,
Please try the following link.
http://ybbest.wordpress.com/2012/07/23/how-to-fix-add-host-to-workflow-farm-problem-when-installing-windows-azure-workflow-in-sharepoint2013-preview/
Please mark it answered, if your problem resolved or helpful.

Similar Messages

Error in register workflow manger

i used this code in sharepoint power shell to register workflow manger
Register-SPWorkflowService -SPSite "http://sp10" -WorkflowHostUri "http://sp11:12291" -AllowOAuthHttp
it is giving me this error:
Register-SPWorkflowService : Failed to query the OAuth S2S metadata endpoint
at URI 'http://sp10/_layouts/15/metadata/json/1'. Error details: 'The
metadata endpoint responded with an error. HTTP status code: Forbidden.'. HTTP
headers received from the server - ActivityId:
32fa9178-136d-4906-802b-506f6acae7d8. NodeId: SP11. Scope: /SharePoint.
Client ActivityId : 107ec3fa-4aab-491d-a68c-9176df2ddbdf.
At line:1 char:1
+ Register-SPWorkflowService -SPSite "http://sp10" -WorkflowHostUri
"http://sp11 ...
+ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~
+ CategoryInfo : InvalidData: (Microsoft.Share...WorkflowService:
RegisterSPWorkflowService) [Register-SPWorkflowService], InvalidRequestExc
eption
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : Microsoft.SharePoint.WorkflowServices.PowerShell
.RegisterSPWorkflowService
how can i solve this error
http://www.waelk.com

Hi,
Glad to hear that you solve this issue, thanks for your sharing.
Thanks,
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Error from Cisco Agent Desktop - The agent- or workflow-initiated action request failed.

We have roughly 20 agents using Cisco Agent Desktop version 85.1.417 and I have one that when she clicks the phone button to answer a call she gets the error: "The agent- or workflow-initiated action request failed."
I reinstalled the program, but she still receives the same error. What could be causing this problem?

This is what I found in the log:
2014-10-06 08:59:46:838 INFO VOIP2021 Desktop monitoring enabled for extension [9214].
2014-10-06 09:00:12:147 WARN STD3000 Get registry key <MTS_CitrixInstall> under path <SOFTWARE\Calabrio\CAD\Site Setup>. Object not found: <2:The system cannot find the file specified.>.
2014-10-06 09:00:12:159 INFO SOCKET0000 <CADEEMConnector> service on port <59015> has started.
2014-10-06 09:01:01:580 INFO PD4002 error while answering call ICDJtapiCallControlChannel (answer) error, invalid callId (17781617 != 37533406)
2014-10-06 09:09:28:543 INFO PD4002 error while answering call ICDJtapiCallControlChannel (answer) error, invalid callId (17781655 != 37533406)
2014-10-06 09:13:42:458 INFO PD4002 error while answering call ICDJtapiCallControlChannel (answer) error, invalid callId (17781669 != 37533406)
2014-10-06 09:29:03:809 INFO PD4002 error while answering call ICDJtapiCallControlChannel (answer) error, invalid callId (17781740 != 37533406)
I'm attaching part of the DBG log. I hope that it helps.
Thanks

Changing the RunAs account without reinstalling Workflow Manger

For SharePoint 2013 installation, I need to change the RunAs account.
is it possible to change the RunAs account without reinstalling Workflow Manger/SB Manager without complete uninstall? Even if I remove all servers from the farm, seems like the RunAs account is always in Management db, so RunAs account is pre-populated
with the old account.
Thank you

To change the RunAs account of the Service Bus, use following PowerShell commands:
Stop-SBFarm
Set-SBFarm -RunAsAccount Domain\Username
$RunAsPassword = ConvertTo-SecureString
-AsPlainText -Force
'<password>'
[RunOnAllNodes] Update-SBHost
-RunAsPassword $RunAsPassword
Start-SBFarm
Then open the Service Control Manager and navigate to Workflow Backend Service and change manually the account.
Restart the Wf Service.
Damir Dobric
developers.de
daenet.de
daenet.eu
daenet.com

Workflow Manager Backend service fails to start - FatalException

Hi,
I installed Workflow Manager 1.0 (with default recommended configuration) and the Cummulative Update 1 and activated the feature on SharePoint 2013. I restarted my server.
The Workflow Manager Backend service cannot start. An attempt is done every 30" but it's always fails. The errors I see in the event viewer (every 30") are the following:
Error 1
Application: Microsoft.Workflow.ServiceHost.exe
Framework Version: v4.0.30319
Description: The process was terminated due to an unhandled exception.
Exception Info: Microsoft.Workflow.Common.FatalException
Stack:
   at Microsoft.Workflow.Common.Fx+<>c__DisplayClass2.<FailFast>b__0()
   at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(System.Threading.ExecutionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback, System.Object, Boolean)
   at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(System.Threading.ExecutionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback, System.Object, Boolean)
   at System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(System.Threading.ExecutionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback, System.Object)
   at System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart()
Error 2
Faulting application name: Microsoft.Workflow.ServiceHost.exe, version: 1.0.20922.0, time stamp: 0x505e1b24
Faulting module name: KERNELBASE.dll, version: 6.2.9200.16451, time stamp: 0x50988aa6
Exception code: 0xe0434352
Fault offset: 0x000000000003811c
Faulting process id: 0x25c0
Faulting application start time: 0x01cefd844175ec32
Faulting application path: C:\Program Files\Workflow Manager\1.0\Workflow\Artifacts\Microsoft.Workflow.ServiceHost.exe
Faulting module path: C:\Windows\system32\KERNELBASE.dll
Report Id: 7fb79f6a-6977-11e3-9401-0050569055b0
Faulting package full name:
Faulting package-relative application ID:
As a result I cannot deploy workflows on SharePoint using Visual Studio. I get a 500 error during activation of the related feature.
Any ideas?
Dimitris Papadimitriou, Software Development Professional

Hi,
I am not sure if you have solved this but it seems that the WF 1.1 Update requires some more updates in one of the tables in the configuration
database for the Workflow installation. Checkout the database [WFResourceManagementDB] and the table [WorkflowServiceConfig]. You need the flowing entries and values:
WorkflowServiceScopeSnapshotProcessBatchSize
20
WorkflowServiceScopeSnapshotProcessLoopInterval
00:05:00
WorkflowServiceSuspendedInstanceRetentionDuration
30.00:00:00
WorkflowServiceMaxInstanceCompressedSizeKB
5120
BR
Magnus Danielson

Workflow manager configuration wizard failing

On running the Workflow Manager Configuration Wizard on our new SharePoint 2013 site, it fails at the stage "Add host to Service Bus farm". I am running as domain admin and have attempted this multiple times but it keeps failing on this part.
Error log gives this: "[Error] [29/05/2013 11:34:25]: System.Management.Automation.CmdletInvocationException: Starting service Service Bus Message Broker failed: Time out has expired and the operation has not been completed. ---> Microsoft.ServiceBus.Commands.Common.Exceptions.OperationFailedException:
Starting service Service Bus Message Broker failed: Time out has expired and the operation has not been completed."
Anybody know the solution to this?
Thanks

Hi Brendan,
Is there additional information in Event Viewer?
Also, probably the following links will be helpful for you:
Troubleshooting Workflow Manager 1.0 Management and Execution
Problem starting message broker during service broker configuration
Regards Michael (http://sp2013-blog.com)
Please, don't forget to press upvote (if answer is helpful) and mark as answer (if it solves your issue)

Scaling out Workflow Manger in various physical location ideas?

We are running Sharepoint 2013 server in 3 tier. It consists of 3 web front end, 2 app server and 3 workflow server with properly load balanced using F5 load balancer. we are looking into the solution to make our workflow services highly available and strengthen
DR recover strategy. At this point all of our servers are located at one datacenter lets say minnesota, but we were thinking to move one of the Workflow manager server to North Carolina. At this circumstances if minnesota had to go down North carolina (Single
Server) would pick up the slack and continue with the services.
So i want to Know is if we can have 2 workflow servers here in Minnesota while 3rd in North carolina and if we can still just utilize F5 Load balancing with just the two in Minnesota.
This would solve issue when failing over to North carolina in our current DR strategy.

That wouldn't be supported. You instead need to use a Cold Standby or Warm Standby WFM farm:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj730570(v=azure.10).aspx
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Installation of Workflow-2.6.3 failing on 10gR2 Oracle Home

Hi
I have installed Oracle 10g R2 on windows 2000. When I am trying to install Workflow server 2.6.3 on this existing Oracle Home, I am getting the error message as the selected Oracle Home is not a 10G Oracle Home.
Can anybody suggest me can we use Oracle Workflow Server 2.6.3 on 10.2. Regards
Rom

Hi,
For 10gR2, you should install Workflow 2.6.4 which ships on the companion CD to the 10g database.
HTH,
Matt
Alpha review chapters from my book "Developing With Oracle Workflow" are available on my website:
http://www.workflowfaq.com
http://forum.workflowfaq.com

Workflow Manager - Add-WFHost fails with "Could not load file" error

Hello! I'm not sure that its Sharepoint related topic but..
I'm trying to install Workflow Manager using Powershell. I'm successfully created ServiceBus farm, create namespace, Add-SBhost etc. Also, i created WF Farm using New-WFFarm.
Now i'm got SB Configuration and try to add my first host to WF Farm using standard cmdlets:
$SBClientConfiguration = Get-SBClientConfiguration -Namespaces 'WorkflowDefaultNamespace'
(it successfuly gives me some endpoint definitions)
Add-WFHost -WFFarmDBConnectionString $WFFarmDBConStr -RunAsPassword $ServiceAccountPassword -EnableFirewallRules $true -SBClientConfiguration $SBClientConfiguration -CertificateAutoGenerationKey $CertificateAutoGenerationKey
where
$WFFarmDBConStr is typical connection string, i also used this to Get-WFFarm with no errors.
$ServiceAccountPassword and $CertificateAutoGenerationKey are secure strings.
But trouble appears with SBClientConfiguration, cmdlet returns error:
"Cannot validate argument on parameter 'SBClientConiguration'. Could not load file or assebly 'Microsoft.ServiceBus, Version=1.8.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=<SomeTokenSymbolsHere> or one of its dependencies. The system cannot
find the file specified."
What file it tries to load? I've installed all WorkflowManager binaries with
webpicmd /Install /Product:WorkflowManagerRefresh key and don't know, what can be cause.

Hi lehus,
According to your description, my understanding is that you got an error when you configured Workflow Manager using PowerShell.
Please try to use the following PowerShell command, compare the result:
Add-WFHost -WFFarmDBConnectionString $WFFarmDBConStr -RunAsPassword $ServiceAccountPassword -EnableFirewallRules $true -SBClientConfiguration $SBClientConfiguration
–EnableHttpPort -CertificateAutoGenerationKey $CertificateAutoGenerationKey
-Verbose
Check your process as:
http://lennytech.wordpress.com/2013/06/02/configuring-workflow-manager-1-0-using-powershell/
In addition, whether you could install and configure Workflow Manager with Workflow Manager Configuration Wizard. Please have a try as:
http://prabathf.blogspot.com/2013/02/installing-and-configuring-workflow-for.html
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Workflow notification when idoc fails

Hi Gurus,
have little confusion over in understnaind the concept of order acknowledgement and shippining notification and the way they appear in MD04. Please ckindly clarify.
We create a PO and send it to the vneodr (this is called 850). we use a third part VAN provider who will trnasmit the PO to our vendor. Now if there vendor receives the PO sucessfully, then it is called a 997. This is received only by the van provider. we do not get this. the van provider will only contact us if the document is not sucessfully trasnmittted.
Now if the vendor agrees to the date and quantity on a single line that we have asked on PO, what is it called? Order acknowledgement or order confirmation or shipping notification? If it is order confirmation, then should it not appear as Ord conf or something like that in MD04. What do we need to do to make it look like ord conf. Becuase rright now we are still in the testing mode, once we get a confrimation about dates and quanitites on the confirmations tab on the P,O, i see that it shows up as SHPNTG ind MD04. is it right or am i missing anything. again this is setup in config. How we can deal a scenario where our users do not want to go the route of creating the inbound delivery automatically, and VL32N goods receipt, tehy dont want to do that. They still want to stick to MIGO and receive. <<Text removed>>
My understanding is as follows, let me know if i'm right or wrong and please correct
PO gets sent out - This is 850.
Van provider gets confirmatioon of the successful receiupt of the PO from vendor - This is 997 and only van proivder gets this.
Order confirmation - is this called order ackwnowledement or order confirmation? The vendor agress to the dates and quantities that we asked, Lets say the vendor changes the dates and/or quantities than what we asked. Is there a posssibility in system where we can put them in wait mode and not update our PO, then the buyer will go to some place in SAP and verify the changes dates and/or quantities that the vendor sent and then accept or reject the changes if we dont like etc.
once the material is put on truck by the vendor, then we can get loading confirmation if we need to. Then finally once when they do the PGI that is when we get the shipping notifdication. IF this is the shipping notification then what is it that we got when the vendor agreed to our dates and quantities or changed the quanittues and dates. Please help
Thanks
Anusha
Edited by: anusha vemulapati on Jun 23, 2011 7:30 PM
Edited by: Matt on Jun 24, 2011 9:51 AM

Hi Anusha,
Well a very long description of question, and too many questions, please mention if something is missed in reply
Firstly when you receive acknowledgement of the order from vendor, that means it is Order Acknowledgement, that vendor agrees to the terms and conditions of the PO sent in the PO, he may send you a date variance and may not, but not sending a date variance doesn't guarantee that there can be no change later.
You mentioned the uses are not ready for Inbound delivery creation, so don't enter the shipping notification confirmation category in your confirmation control set up at all, or if you want you can use it but make it unaffected for your GR posting manually, by not ticking the GR assignment field in the confirmation control against shipping notification. by doing this it doesn't matter whether an Inbound delivery exists or not, you can post a GR Manually using MIGO.
See basically order acknowledgement is just an acceptance by the vendor of the PO terms and condition whereas a shipping notification is more relevant from planning point of view, because it gives you exact dates of material reciept, also you can link use these documents for various other purposes.
Regards
Chandra Shekhar

How to create workflow-status = failed with ContentService?

Hi!
For test-purpose I need a workflow with the status "failed". How can I create one?
greetings
Verena

Hi Robert
May this help
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/d6/eddef503944dc6bbe8d81a2cec44e8/frameset.htm">Customising UWL tabs</a>
Check the <a href="https://help.sap.com/javadocs/NW04S/current/uw/index.html">UWL API</a>
<a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/57/c223be82104792a15c2df11377b9ed/frameset.htm">Using UWL</a>
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/0a/ad68c125ae496f8c04a25090bd2e3c/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/3e/09df7f284f4fb9b50aaedf80652f4c/frameset.htmhttp://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/36/dd4ad73c86412e81e9ce66eeb147e7/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/09/6d6b17b29b4eef83a553acaa52f668/frameset.htm
Thanks
Swathi

SharePoint 2010 Designer workflow failing in an Ad hoc manner.

Hi Friends,
We have a SharePoint 2010 Designer workflow with 25 approval stages (supposed to run for around 1.5 yrs. ) . We have a consistent problem in the workflow as it keeps failing with message "error occured" at some stages(not uniform) after a users
tries to submit his Tasks .
After lot of troubleshooting , we found that all the workflow which is getting failed have a Tasks on which the due date of tasks has exceeded. I meant to say that user is submitting his Task (which is a custom info-path 2010 form ) after the due date of
the Tasks.
Can any one suggest if this is supposed to be the Obvious behavior of workflow ? That is ,if the user submits his Task when the due date has passed , the workflow will fail with error.

Hi Friends,
We have a SharePoint 2010 Designer workflow with 25 approval stages (supposed to run for around 1.5 yrs. ) . We have a consistent problem in the workflow as it keeps failing with message "error occured" at some stages(not uniform) after a users tries
to submit his Tasks .
After lot of troubleshooting , we found that all the workflow which is getting failed have a Tasks on which the due date of tasks has exceeded. I meant to say that user is submitting his Task (which is a custom info-path 2010 form ) after the due date of the
Tasks.
Can any one suggest if this is supposed to be the Obvious behavior of workflow ? That is ,if the user submits his Task when the due date has passed , the workflow will fail with error.
Athar raza faridi

Informatica Start Workflow failed in Workflow Manager

Hi,
I have just completed the installation of oracle BI Apps version 7.9.4 (Chapter 4 & 5 of installtion document). Now I am trying to run workflow using informatica workflow manager and i am getting below error in workflow log.
It says "Cannot find specified parameter file [opt/oracle/informatica/server/SrcFiles/PLP.PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update.txt] for session [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update].]."
What does this mean? Do i need to perform any post installation steps? If yes, what are those? Were can i find the information on what needs to be done for loading the data?
Error Log:
INFO : LM_36435 : (8588|-1567704144) Starting execution of workflow [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update] in folder [PLP] last saved by user [Administrator].
INFO : LM_36330 [Tue Feb 26 23:46:06 2008] : (8588|-1567704144) Start task instance [Start]: Execution started.
INFO : LM_36318 [Tue Feb 26 23:46:06 2008] : (8588|-1567704144) Start task instance [Start]: Execution succeeded.
INFO : LM_36505 : (8588|-1567704144) Link [Start --> PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: empty expression string, evaluated to TRUE.
INFO : LM_36330 [Tue Feb 26 23:46:06 2008] : (8588|-1567704144) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: Execution started.
INFO : LM_36522 : (8588|-1567704144) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: Started DTM process [pid = 9081] for this session instance.
INFO : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: LM_36033 [Connected to repository [Oracle_BI_DW_Base] running on server:port [PUNITP85528D.ad.infosys.com]:[5001] user [Administrator]].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: CMN_1761 [Timestamp Event: [Tue Feb 26 23:46:14 2008]].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: VAR_27015 [Cannot find specified parameter file [/opt/oracle/informatica/server/SrcFiles/PLP.PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update.txt] for session [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update].].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: CMN_1761 [Timestamp Event: [Tue Feb 26 23:46:14 2008]].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: TM_6269 [Error: The session cannot open the parameter file.].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: CMN_1761 [Timestamp Event: [Tue Feb 26 23:46:14 2008]].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: TM_6163 [Error initializing variables and parameters for the paritition.].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: CMN_1761 [Timestamp Event: [Tue Feb 26 23:46:14 2008]].
ERROR : TM_6292 : (9081|-1249401152) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: TM_6226 [ERROR: Failed to initialize session [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]].
ERROR : LM_36320 [Tue Feb 26 23:46:16 2008] : (8588|-1578194000) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: Execution failed.
WARNING : LM_36331 : (8588|-1578194000) Session task instance [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update] failed and its "fail parent if this task fails" setting is turned on. So, Workflow [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update] will be failed.
ERROR : LM_36320 : (8588|-1578194000) Workflow [PLP_SalesOrderLinesFact_InvoicedQty_Update]: Execution failed.
Thanks,
Prasad Narvekar

Hi Damon,
I am getting below error in DAC log
ANOMALY INFO::: Error while evaluating $$LAST_EXTRACT_DATE
MESSAGE:::No value for @DAC_SOURCE_REFRESH_TIMESTAMP available!
EXCEPTION CLASS::: com.siebel.analytics.etl.converter.evaluator.EvaluationException
com.siebel.analytics.etl.converter.evaluator.TimestampEvaluator.evaluate(TimestampEvaluator.java:243)
com.siebel.analytics.etl.runtime.RuntimeFunctionHelper.getEvaluatedParameters(RuntimeFunctionHelper.java:195)
com.siebel.etl.engine.core.Session.run(Session.java:2955)
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
17828 INFO Sun Mar 02 20:54:23 IST 2008 Error while evaluating $$LAST_EXTRACT_DATE_IN_SQL_FORMAT
Mar 2, 2008 8:54:23 PM global
INFO: Error while evaluating $$LAST_EXTRACT_DATE_IN_SQL_FORMAT
17829 FINEST Sun Mar 02 20:54:23 IST 2008
ANOMALY INFO::: Error while evaluating $$LAST_EXTRACT_DATE_IN_SQL_FORMAT
MESSAGE:::No value for @DAC_SOURCE_REFRESH_TIMESTAMP available!
EXCEPTION CLASS::: com.siebel.analytics.etl.converter.evaluator.EvaluationException
com.siebel.analytics.etl.converter.evaluator.TimestampEvaluator.evaluate(TimestampEvaluator.java:243)
com.siebel.analytics.etl.runtime.RuntimeFunctionHelper.getEvaluatedParameters(RuntimeFunctionHelper.java:195)
com.siebel.etl.engine.core.Session.run(Session.java:2955)
java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
I have created the custome container and set these values thee. but somehow they are not available for execution plan.
How do we set this values in custom container?
Thanks,
Prasad N.

We have 2 session in workflow if 1st session got failed-still 2nd session has to execute and workflow should go to suspended mode.How can we achieve this?

Thanks Veeru In this case workflow will go to Failed state but I want it in Suspended mode. Can you please help over here/

HI Mounika, At session level you have option fail parent if task fails. Failing Parent Workflow or Worklet #You can choose to fail the workflow or worklet if a task fails or does not run. The workflow or worklet that contains the task instance is called the parent. A task might not run when the input condition for the task evaluates to False.#To fail the parent workflow or worklet if the task fails, double-click the task and select the Fail Parent If This Task Fails option in the General tab. When you select this option and a task fails, it does not prevent the other tasks in the workflow or worklet from running. Instead, the Integration Service marks the status of the workflow or worklet as failed. If you have a session nested within multiple worklets, you must select the Fail Parent If This Task Fails option for each worklet instance to see the failure at the workflow level. #To fail the parent workflow or worklet if the task does not run, double-click the task and select the Fail Parent If This Task Does Not Run option in the General tab. When you choose this option, the Integration Service fails the parent workflow if a task did not run. This will help you. Regards,Veeru

Informatica Workflow "Succeeded" even correspsonding session Failed.

We have installed following,
obiee 10.3.1.4,
DAC 10.3.1.4,
BIApps 7.9.6,
Informatica 8.6
we are trying to run HRMS full load from DAC. But in Informatica workflow monitor "SDE_ORA_PayrollFact_Full" session FAILED but corresponding Workflow "SDE_ORA_PayrollFact_Full" status shows as "Succeeded". Since Informatica Workflow was Succeeded,DAC marks that job as Succeeded.
So question is why Informatica shows Work-flow as "Succeeded" even corresponding session status is in failed status?
Thanks,
slokam

Frustrating isn't it?
Open Workflow Designer and locate the workflow SDE_ORA_PayrollFact_Full. Go to Tools and select Workflow Desinger. Drag the SDE_ORA_PayrollFact_Full worfklow into the work area. Double click the session that is failing and ensure the following checkboxes are clicked: (1) Fail parent if this task fails, (2) Fail parent if this task does not run.
Hope this helps.
- Austin

Workflow Manger 1.0 failed.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for