WRED+bandwidth allocation algorithm ?

Dear Gurus!
Plese tell me what is the bandwidth allocation algorithm:
I have 3 flows within 1 class-map.
WRED is enabled on the output ATM pvc(the total bandwidth of pvc is 2000kbps).
Flows have dscp marks af11(10) af12(12) af13(14).
When the pvc is congested the flows get the following bandwidth share in outgoing interface: af11(dscp 10) - 59% ; af12(dscp 12) - 40%; af13(dscp 14) - 1%; + bulk traffic with dscp 0.
Total bandwidth allocated for flows 10,12,14 is near 1500000bits per sec (75% of 2000kbps)
All flows have same packet sizes - 1400 bytes
Plese tell me how 7200 calculates bandwidth allocation between flow with dscp 10 , 12 and 14.
I have the following
router 7206
IOS (tm) 7200 Software (C7200-JK8S-M), Version 12.2(13), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
cisco 7206VXR (NSE-1) processor (revision A)
ATM PA - OC3
config:
class-map match-all af11
match ip dscp af11 af12 af13
policy-map gold
class af11
bandwidth percent 65
random-detect dscp-based
random-detect dscp 10 28 45 10
random-detect dscp 12 28 43 10
random-detect dscp 14 28 40 10
class class-default
bandwidth percent 10
interface ATM2/0.34 point-to-point
description RBNet
bandwidth 2000
ip address 10.0.4.1 255.255.255.252
pvc rbnet 15/64
vbr-nrt 2000 1500 50
tx-ring-limit 3
encapsulation aal5mux ip
service-policy output gold
Thanks in advance, Andrei

Ok Andrei,
Here's my thinking about what is happening...
You are transmitting a total of 300*1400*8 = 3.36Mbps into a circuit that is configured for 2Mbps. Since this traffic is being sent at a continuous rate, that means that the queue is in a state of constant congestion. In fact, the size of the queue is going to be sitting around the maximum of 45 packets pretty much all the time. The only time that space is created in the queue is when:
1. A packet is scheduled out of the queue
2. Packets are dropped due to RED
Now, if the queue is always around the 45 packet mark, that means that once the queue reaches that point, all packets for DSCP 14 are going to be dropped since the queue depth is greater than the maximum threshold of 40 for DSCP 14.
Considering the DSCP 10 traffic now...Both the DSCP 10 and DSCP 12 traffic is operating in the RED drop zone since the queue size is much higher than their minimum threshold of 20. Therefore, roughly 1/10 packets are getting dropped for each of these flows. 1/10 of each flow would give you roughly 2 packets of each based on the fact that very little of the DSCP 14 traffic is getting through. Every time RED drops these packets, space is created in the queue and if at that point, the queue size is less than 43, packets for DSCP 12 are accepted. The queue size is always going to be less than or equal to 45, so slightly more of the DSCP 10 packets are accepted.
I hope that explains the behaviour adequately.
Pls do remember to rate posts.
Paresh

Similar Messages

  • USB Bandwidth Allocation - Numbers required:

    Hi,
    I am looking for specific information on how Windows allocates bandwidth to different USB devices connect to the PC.
    I am aware that the amount of USB Bus bandwidth allocated depends on factors like No. of USB End points, End point Max. packet size, Type of transfer (Bulk, isoch, interrupt), Operating speed (Full speed, high speed, super speed) etc.,
    But I am wondering if there are any specific numbers on the amount of bandwidth allocated by windows, and on what basis, the bandwidth allocation is done.
    It will be great if you provide me with this info.
    Regards,
    -Madhu

    Hi,
    The system allocates bandwidth on a first-come-first-serve basis.
    And Based on my knowledge, the bandwidth which the system reserved for USB1.1 is lower than USB2.0.
    For more information, please refer to the following article.
    Why is my USB driver getting out of bandwidth errors?
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff540194(v=vs.85).aspx
    Hope this helps,
    Ada Liu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Bandwidth allocation | default class|CBWFQ

    Hi everybody
    Let say we have 100 mig circuit. Max -reserved bandwidth is 100 mig as well.  We make following allocations:
    Class A
    bandwidth 20
    Class B
    bandwidth 60
    Class  Default.
    1)We did not make any bandwidth  allocations for default class.  Assuming We are congested ( i.e class A, class B ), What is the maximum bandwidth Class Default can use?
    2) Let say we are congested ( classA,classB) but there is no traffic in default class. How will this  unused 20 mig will be distributed among these classA and class B?
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    I am getting confusing answers:
    For example:
    From one of theblog ( Dont want pick on author so did not quote it)
    You'll want to configure a bandwidth command under the class class-default Otherwise, IOS will divide any unallocated bandwidth equally among all classes; this can result in the class-defaulthaving a very small amount of bandwidth.
    Cisco QOS  Documentation says:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/command/reference/qos_cr.pdf
    From the above link:
    The following output from theshow policy-map interfacecommand on serial interface 3/2 shows that 500 kbps of bandwidth is guaranteed for the class
    named voice1. The classes named class1 and class2 receive 50 percent and 25 percent of the remaining bandwidth, respectively. Any unallocated bandwidth
    is divided proportionally among class1, class2, and any best-effort traffic classes
    Which One is true statement?
    If Cisco documentation is correct, then what proportion of unallocated bandwidth is given to default class as there is no bandwidth percentage configured under default class.
    Thanks

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    #2 If there's just traffic for classes A and B, they will proportionally share it 20:60 or 1:3 (or 25%:75%).  (NB: the former is assuming they want "more".  If not, actual usage might not reflect bandwidth allocation.  For example, if class B only used/wanted 50% of link, class A could obtain the other 50%.)
    #1 recall finding some blog that really went deep into what class-default gets when you don't explicitly allocate bandwidth.  I also recall it may have been IOS version dependent and whether FIFO or FQ was defined in class-default (this also was pre-HQF).
    It was very complicated, and IMO, best avoided by defining bandwidth in class-default, if class-default usage, relative to other defined classes, is important to your QoS policy.
    Generally, if something isn't clearly documented as expected behavior, I avoid relying on "discovered" actual behavior, because it might change with next IOS release.

  • Undo Block Allocation Algorithm in Automatic Undo Management

    Hi,
    Can someone please explain me the Undo Block allocation algorithm in Automatic Undo Management??
    I need to tune my Undo tablespace in my Prod database.
    regards,
    Arul Sekar

    Hi,
    Thanks for the link provided.....
    But the link which has been provided does not contain the details about the Undo block allocation alogorithm in AUM.
    Can you please help me in this regard??
    regards,
    Arul Sekar

  • Bandwidth allocation per vrf

    Hello,
    in my lab i have 3 sites each with 3 VRF's configured. A diagram ist attached. I like to configure fixed bandwidth for each vrf. the central vrf should have 768 kbps and the the other ones ones should have 256 kbps each.
    What are the options i have to achive this?
    Thanks a lot in advanced
    Alex

    Hi Alex
    Since you have already policed the bandwidth at the access, would there be any excess bandwidth that will leak from this policing.
    Besides, ideally you would configure your core with a standard llq+cbwfq config and give priority to voice. You will in production have multiple customers and you cant have sich a bandwidth restriction in place.
    Also, no you cannot police bw in core per vrf. But at the same time I can think of a non-conventional way of doing it by using TE but that is a very bad way of doing it.
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support Android App

  • Nexus 7009 bandwidth allocation per port in shared and dedicated mode:

    We have 7009 with following I/O modules:
    N7K-F248XP-25E --
    N7K-C7009-FAB-2 - qty 3
    N7K-SUP2
    I would like to know that each port of N7K-F248XP-25E will get how much bandwidth in shared mode. if we are using only one port group with 4 ports each port with 10gbps is it possible in shared mode to get 40gbps in one port group.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I'm not sure there is such a thing as shared and dedicated mode on the N7K-F248XP-25E I/O module. I don't have one to test with, but you can see this if you execute the command show interface capabilities on your switch. If you look for the "Rate mode" line in the output it will show as dedicated or dedicated/shared. I suspect the ports on this module will all show as dedicated.
    That said, with your configuration there is potential for some level of over-subscription.
    The N7K-F248XP-25E I/O module uses a Switch on Chip (SoC) architecture with the 48-ports 10-GE ports connected via 12 SoCs, so the "port grouping" is ports 1-4=SoC 1, 5-8=SoC 2 etc.
    Each of the SoC has 40-Gbps of capacity to the switch fabric ASIC, which in turn has up to 550-Gbps capacity to the switching fabric. The 550-Gbps fabric capacity is the maximum based on 110-Gbps per slot, per fabric to the installed Fabric 2 Modules. To realise this capacity there must be five Fabric 2 modules installed in the chassis.
    From the hardware list you've supplied, you only have three Fabric 2 modules installed and as such you can only achieve a maximum of 330-Gbps per I/O module slot. What this means is that you have 480-Gbps host facing bandwidth, but 330-Gbps Fabric facing bandwidth, so a potential 1.45:1 over-subscription.
    You can reduce the over-subscription into the switch fabric by adding additional Fabric 2 modules.
    Regards

  • Bandwidth Allocation

    Dear Netpros,
    We have a Cisco AS5350 4E1 Gateway which we are using to terminate voice calls coming from Tier 1 carriers over the internet. Now currently we have a bandwidth of 1 Mbps and we have 2 customers using this bandwidth for sending voip traffic. We are soon going to have another Tier 1 Carrier testing with us and we were wondering if we could allocate bandwidth customer wise. This means that each customer can use only a % of the total bandwidth. Currently there are seperate tech-prefixes and seperate dial-peers configured on the gateway for these customers. Is there any was we can achieve this. If yes then kindly let us know the procedure to achieve this.
    Cheers
    Rushabh
    Senior Project Researcher
    PP-Ontime Co., Ltd.
    Cellular ~ 669-2047331
    www.pp-ontime.co.th

    A few options are possible. You may choose the one based onyour convinience. The options are: -
    a. Have your gatekeeper make the bandwidth choice based on the tech-prefix
    b. If you have a set of E1-s dedicated for each customer, assign a trunk-group
    for this set and make your dial-peer choice based on the trunk group number
    of the incoming PSTN call.
    c. You can use 'max-connection ..' under dial-peer voip configuration
    to restrict the number of calls that can simultaneously be active using
    a dial-peer. Based on the codec you have in your dialplan, this
    command can be used to restrict the number of outgoing calls through
    a given dialpeer

  • Bandwidth Allocation for a specific VPN Tunnel - PIX 525 7.2(1)

    Hello,
    I have a PIX with a 10 MB internet connection. This PIX has several L2L VPN Tunnels configured: Tunnel1, Tunnel2...TunnelN. I want to be able guarentee 5Mb of the total 10Mb to a specific VPN Tunnel. Is this possible? I have read the following links, however I believe that the configuration guidelines I'm looking for are a combination of several examples shown here:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_example09186a008080dfa7.shtml#tab4
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-1230
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_tech_note09186a008084de0c.shtml#cqos
    The tunnel is being defined by the following commands:
    crypto map prdmay 20 match address vpn_1
    crypto map prdmay 20 set peer 61.172.142.222
    crypto map prdmay 20 set transform-set TS
    access-list vpn_1 extended permit ip 10.14.102.0 255.255.255.0 any
    access-list vpn_1 extended permit ip 10.14.101.0 255.255.255.0 any
    tunnel-group 61.172.142.222 type ipsec-l2l
    tunnel-group 61.172.142.222 ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *
    Is the following what I need to do in order to accomplish what I want:
    priority-queue outside
    class-map vpn_5Mb
    match access-list vpn_1
    match tunnel-group 61.172.142.222
    policy-map police-priority-policy
    class vpn_5Mb
    police output 5120000
    service-policy police-priority-policy interface outside
    Thank you for your help.

    I don't think the ASA will let you match on ACL and tunnel group at the same time.
    Just the ACL will do though. The ACL should match local ip addresses (there are usually no-natted for the VPN anyway).
    Here is a page with a QoS examples on the ASA for reference https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-1230
    I hope it helps.
    PK

  • Cannot submit datapipe for urb 0, error -28: not enough bandwidth

    cannot submit datapipe for urb 0, error -28: not enough bandwidth
    What is causing this?
    I read something about disabling the following:
    :[ ] Enforce USB bandwidth allocation (EXPERIMENTAL)
    :[ ] Dynamic USB minor allocation (EXPERIMENTAL)
    But I feel that recompiling the kernel and changing in there is a bit out of my league but if it's the only solution there is I guess I have no choice.
    Anyways, I was hoping someone here maybe has seen this issue and know how to solve it.

    I don't think so. I remember for certain patchsets on Solaris (Sparc), to be able to apply the patchset - I had to download an interim patch to update the OUI version. It was necessary to apply that particular patchset. And I got that from Metalink, it was documented in the patchset help file. I guess, you should try the Metalink. The OUI version 10.1.0.4 I was referring to actually comes with iAS 10g R2. For the database version, 10g R2 - OUI version is 10.2.
    Message was edited by:
    zaferaktan

  • How to ration flatmates bandwidth

    An old problem ( that should have been fixed in the 1990s !)...
    I'm in a house with other net users.
    When one of their computers downloads a file, it hogs all the bandwidth it can, which jams up all the other connections, like any online games become unplayable.
    One housemate always has 5 HD movies downloading in parallel, which basically means, for want a just 10-50k of bandwidth per connection, serveral online actvities become unusable for the rest of the house.
    Just looking for a router that can ration out bandwidth per user.
    Do BT infinity routers do it?

    There is a guide from TP Link here.
    http://www.tp-link.com/en/article/?id=194
    Once you assign an IP address to the MAC address of a device, you can then control the bandwidth allocated to that device, as shown in the guide.
    There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
    BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

  • Thinking of purchasing EA6500. Can it monitor bandwidth use by device

    I'm thinking of purchasing a Cisco Linksys EA6500. I need a router that can one monitor bandwidth used by device. Keep exceeding our ISP's network bandwidth allocation, need to identify the devices that are causing this high usage and be able to do so from the router. Does the EA6500's standard software support this, is their router software one can obtain for the unit that does this or is there another home router option that can perform this function? Stephen, Madeisky

    If I were in your shoes, I would find a router that supported it. Linksys routers aren't designed and marketed for stuff like that.
    As was previously said, netgear routers are the only ones that I'm aware of that do that. But there could be others.
    Check here:
    Www.smallnetbuilder.com

  • EF class bandwidth for VoIP not fully utilised

    We have a customer who has subscribed to 1M of EF ( Expedite forwarding) class bandwidth ( in a 2M link)for transporting voice, AF1 class 392K for Voice signalling. The codec used is G.729b.The problem faced by the customer is they are not able to fully utilise the 1M bandwidth allocated for voice. The number of voice calls doesn't exceed 30 although there is enough bandwidth for about 35+ calls.There are also no drops seen in EF class.
    Any idea whats causing this? Any specific debug which can be captured on the router when call volume peaks?
    Many Thanks
    ED

    'show isdn call-rate' on some platforms will show you if the call flow is going through a PRI.
    Otherwise there isn't much in the CLI that will tell you this, and you would need VOIP monitoring software.
    'show voice call stat', 'show voice call summary', and 'show call active voice brief' will allow you to see many active calls are up at any given time, but no historical data.
    You may want to try switching from G.729b to G.729. G.729b is going to have a varying bandwidth since it only sends packets when there is speech. If you use G.729 you will have a constant-rate codec rather than variable and you will receive better voice quality and more reliable QoS/bandwidth requirements.
    -nick

  • VLAN Bandwidth Management

    How we can share a Bandwidth in a VLAN,
    I mean share a Bandwidth in a single VALN Clients,
    can we do it through a IOS configuration or is there any hardware for this solution,
    Note: Currently we are using L3(3550) & L2(2950) switches.
    L2 in VTP client Mode, L3 in VTP Server Mode, and all VLANS are creat in L3 Switches.
    Thank You

    Hello Mansoor,
    understood, thanks for the clarification. I am not sure if this sort of dynamic bandwidth allocation is possible with just the IOS on the 3750. You can definitely police the bandwidth per user, but this would be a static allocation:
    policy-map LIMIT_BANDWIDTH
    class class-default
    police 100000 12500 exceed-action policed-dscp-transmit
    interface FastEthernet0/1
    service-policy output LIMIT_BANDWIDTH
    service-policy input LIMIT_BANDWIDTH
    This example would limit each port to 100K of traffic, in case more traffic is sent, that traffic would be marked down according to a policed DSCP map...
    Regards,
    Nethelper

  • Max-reserved-bandwidth 100% for the interface

    According to CCO as following text, the remaining 25 percent of bandwidth is used for overhead, including Layer 2 overhead, control traffic, and best-effort traffic. I want to know why cisco choose 25 percent. why not 30% or 20%?
    If I config the max-reserved-bandwidth 100% for the interface, does it will effect the routing protocol? also effect the network conectivity?
    thanks for your answer
    =======
    Usage Guidelines for max-reserved-bandwidth
    The sum of all bandwidth allocation on an interface should not exceed 75 percent of the available bandwidth on an interface. The remaining 25 percent of bandwidth is used for overhead, including Layer 2 overhead, control traffic, and best-effort traffic.
    If you need to allocate more than 75 percent for RSVP, CBWFQ, LLQ, IP RTP Priority, Frame Relay IP RTP Priority, and Frame Relay PIPQ, you can use the max-reserved-bandwidth command. The percent argument specifies the maximum percentage of the total interface bandwidth that can be used.
    If you do use the max-reserved-bandwidth command, make sure that not too much bandwidth is taken away from best-effort and control traffic.
    The max-reserved-bandwidth command is intended for use on main interfaces only; it has no effect on virtual circuits (VCs) or ATM permanent virtual circuits (PVCs).

    Kevin,
    this is the wrong group for this question.
    Gilles.

  • 11.1.2.1 Release Delayed Again?

    At the end of March, I was hearing April 10. Today I read this:
    http://blog.topdownconsulting.com/2011/04/oracle-hyperion-11-1-2-1%E2%80%94now-it-looks-like-summer/
    Anbody have good information on whether April 10 is real or not?

    <div style="width:660px; font-size: 10pt; font-family: verdana,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; line-height: 20px; text-align: justify; text-justify: inter-ideograph;">
    We have selected the most popular papers published by <strong>IJCNS</strong> in the year 2010 for you. You are welcome to forward this message to your colleagues and friends in the related areas.
    <i>International Journal of Communications, Network and System Sciences</i> (<strong>IJCNS</strong>)
    is an international refereed journal dedicated to the latest advancement of communications and network technologies. The goal of this journal is to keep a record of the state-of-the-art research and promote the research work in these fast moving areas.
         <strong>IJCNS</strong> is published by Scientific Research Publishing which is engaged in the service of publications, organizing academic conferences and promotion of professional journals. SCIRP has an outstanding team of experts as well as the widespread third party relations, which enables our customers to obtain maximum reader impact, and the satisfaction and convenience of timely publications.
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.1</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    Extending the Network Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks Using Residual Energy Extraction&mdash;Hybrid Scheduling Algorithm
    <span style="color:#808080">T. V. PADMAVATHY, M. CHITRA</span>
    A Maximum Likelihood TOA Based Estimator For Localization in Heterogeneous Networks
    <span style="color:#808080">Mohamed LAARAIEDH, Stephane AVRILLON, Bernard UGUEN</span>
    Achievable Rate Regions for Orthogonally Multiplexed MIMO Broadcast Channels with Multi-Dimensional Modulation
    <span style="color:#808080">Marthe KASSOUF, Harry LEIB</span>
    </div>
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.2</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    Online Detection of Network Traffic Anomalies Using Degree Distributions
    <span style="color:#808080">Wuzuo WANG, Weidong WU</span>
    CPW Fed Double T-Shaped Array Antenna with Suppressed Mutual Coupling
    <span style="color:#808080">A. DANIDEH, A. A. Lotfi NEYESTANAK</span>
    A Topology-Aware Relay Lookup Scheme for P2P VoIP System
    <span style="color:#808080">Xiuwu ZHANG, Ruifeng GUO, Weimin LEI, Wei ZHANG</span>
    </div>
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.3</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    Advances in MIMO Techniques for Mobile Communications-A Survey
    <span style="color:#808080">Farhan Khalid, Joachim Speidel</span>
    Short-Term Load Forecasting Using Soft Computing Techniques
    <span style="color:#808080">D. K. Chaturvedi, Sinha Anand Premdayal, Ashish Chandiok</span>
    A Mobile Ad-Hoc Routing Algorithm with Comparative Study of Earlier Proposed Algorithms
    <span style="color:#808080">Kumar Verma Pawan, Gupta Tarun, Rakesh Nitin, Nitin Nitin</span>
    </div>
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.4</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    Envelope Correlation Parameter Measurements in a MIMO Antenna Array Configuration
    <span style="color:#808080">Constantinos Votis, George Tatsis, Panos Kostarakis</span>
    MIMO Multi Carrier Interleave Division Multiple Access System with Multiuser Detection: Performance Results
    <span style="color:#808080">Prabagarane Nagaradjane, Sai N. Chandrasekaran, Kuttathatti Srinivasan Vishvaksenan</span>
    Comparative Study of Different Space-Time Coding Schemes for MC-CDMA Systems
    <span style="color:#808080">Lokesh Kumar Bansal, Aditya Trivedi</span>
    </div>
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.5</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    Measurements of Balun and Gap Effects in a Dipole Antenna
    <span style="color:#808080">Constantinos Votis, Vasilis Christofilakis, Panos Kostarakis</span>
    Microstrip Low-Pass Elliptic Filter Design Based on Implicit Space Mapping Optimization
    <span style="color:#808080">Saeed Tavakoli, Mahdieh Zeinadini, Shahram Mohanna</span>
    Interoperability of Wireless Networks with 4G Based on Layer Modification
    <span style="color:#808080">Dilshad Mahjabeen, Aminul Haque Mohammed Sayem, Anis Ahmed, Shahida Rafique</span>
    </div>
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.6</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    A Multi-objective QoS Optimization with Fuzzy Based Parameter Setting for Real-Time Multicasting
    <span style="color:#808080">Satyananda Champati Rai, Bijan Bihari Misra, Ajit Kumar Nayak, Rajib Mall, Sateesh Kumar Pradhan</span>
    Flocking Control of a Group of Agents Using a Fuzzy-Logic-Based Attractive/Repulsive Function
    <span style="color:#808080">Hui Yu, Jigui Jian, Yanjun Shen</span>
    An Empirical Examination of Routing Protocols in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks
    <span style="color:#808080">Kuncha Sahadevaiah, Oruganti Bala Venkata Ramanaiah</span>
    </div>
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.7</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    Using Bayesian Game Model for Intrusion Detection in Wireless Ad Hoc Networks
    <span style="color:#808080">Hua Wei, Hao Sun</span>
    Design of Rectangular Dielectric Resonator Antenna Fed by Dielectric Image Line with a Finite Ground Plane
    <span style="color:#808080">Fatemeh Kazemi, Mohammad Hassan Neshati, Farahnaz Mohanna</span>
    Modeling and Analysis of Bandwidth Allocation in IEEE 802.16 MAC: A Stochastic Reward Net Approach
    <span style="color:#808080">Shanmugam Geetha, Raman Jayaparvathy</span>
    </div>
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.8</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    A Sensor Awakening Algorithm for Wireless Multimedia Sensor Networks Three Dimensional Target Tracking
    <span style="color:#808080">Jing Zhao, Jianchao Zeng</span>
    Reliable Wireless Communication for Medical Devices Using Turbo Convolution Code
    <span style="color:#808080">Debasish Bera, Tapas Chakravarty, Saswat Chakrabarti</span>
    Potential Vulnerability of Encrypted Messages: Decomposability of Discrete Logarithm Problems
    <span style="color:#808080">Boris S. Verkhovsky</span>
    </div>
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.9</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    An Efficient Noisy-ICA Based Approach to Multiuser Detection in IDMA Systems
    <span style="color:#808080">Abdelkrim Hamza, Salim Chitroub, G&eacute;rard Salut</span>
    Modulation Index Estimation of Frequency and Phase Modulated Signals
    <span style="color:#808080">Geng Peng, Derong Cai, Zhiqiang He, Zhitao Huang</span>
    A New Effective and Efficient Measure of PAPR in OFDM
    <span style="color:#808080">Ibrahim M. Hussain, Imran A. Tasadduq, Abdul Rahim Ahmad</span>
    </div>
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.10</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    Performance Improvement of Wireless Communications Using Frequency Hopping Spread Spectrum
    <span style="color:#808080">Yang Liu</span>
    A Comparative Analysis of Tools for Verification of Security Protocols
    <span style="color:#808080">Nitish Dalal, Jenny Shah, Khushboo Hisaria, Devesh Jinwala</span>
    A Turbo Decoder Included in a Multi-User Detector: A Solution to be Retained
    <span style="color:#808080">Sylvie Kerou&eacute;dan, Makram Touzri, Patrick Adde, Samir Saoudi</span>
    </div>
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.11</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    Service Networks Topological Design
    <span style="color:#808080">Boris S. Verkhovsky</span>
    A Routing Strategy with Link Disruption Tolerance for Multilayered Satellite Networks
    <span style="color:#808080">Gang Zheng, Yanxin Guo</span>
    Extraction of Buried Signals in Noise: Correlated Processes
    <span style="color:#808080">Nour&eacute;dine Yahya Bey</span>
    </div>
    <div>
    <span style="font-size: 13pt; font-weight:bold; line-height:24px">Vol.3 No.12</span> <span style="font-size:7pt">(Click to view the issue)</span>
    Enhanced Euclid Algorithm for Modular Multiplicative Inverse and Its Application in Cryptographic Protocols
    <span style="color:#808080">Boris S. Verkhovsky</span>
    Extraction of Signals Buried in Noise: Non-Ergodic Processes
    <span style="color:#808080">Nour&eacute;dine Yahya Bey</span>
    A Synchronous and Deterministic MAC Protocol for Wireless Communications on Linear Topologies
    <span style="color:#808080">Daniele De Caneva, Pier Luca Montessoro</span>
    </div>
    The journal publishes the highest quality, original papers included but not limited to the fields:
    <tr>
         <td style="vertical-align:top">
              <ul style="list-style:disc;margin-left:18px; margin-top:2px; padding:0;">
                   <li>Ad Hoc and Mesh Networks</li>
                   <li>Coding, Detection and Modulation</li>
                   <li>Cognitive Radio</li>
                   <li>Communication Networks Architecture Design</li>
                   <li>Cooperative Communications</li>
                   <li>Embedded Distributed Systems</li>
                   <li>Global Networks</li>
                   <li>Heterogeneous Networking</li>
                   <li>MIMO and OFDM Technologies</li>
                   <li>Network Protocol, QoS and Congestion Control</li>
                   <li>Network Reliability, Security and Privacy</li>
                   <li>Network Survivability</li>
                   <li>Next Generation Network Architectures</li>
                   <li>Reconfigurable Networks</li>
                   <li>Resource Management</li>
                   <li>Satellite Communication</li>
                   <li>Sensor Networks</li>
                   <li>Simulation and Optimization Tools</li>
                   <li>UWB Technologies</li>
                   <li>Wave Propagation and Antenna Design</li>
                   <li>Wireless Personal Communications</li>
              </ul>
         </td>
    </tr>
    We are also interested in short papers (letters) that clearly address a specific problem, and short survey or position papers that sketch the results or problems on a specific topic. Authors of selected short papers would be invited to write a regular paper on the same topic for future issues of the <strong>IJCNS</strong>.
    <span style="font-size:11pt; font-weight:bold;">You are welcome to submit your manuscripts!</span>
    </div>
    Edited by: 850791 on 2011-4-11 下午8:56

Maybe you are looking for