Writing a trigger to update the QOH in a Parts table for for each item of the order whenever the order is filled. The trigger is for the OrderItem table when an item record is inserted into the OrderItem table.

Any ideas?

Hi,
If orderitem and parts are the only tables involved, and each orderitem references only 1 part, then it's pretty simple: just update parts, like this
UPDATE parts
SET qoh = qoh - :NEW.quantity
WHERE part_num = :NEW.part_num;
If you can modify filled orderitems (e.g., DELETE orderitems or change the part_num after the order is filled, or change the status from filled back to unfilled then it's more complicated; you might have UPDATE the :OLD.part_num as well as the :NEW.part_num
I hope this answers your question.
If not, post your best attempt, along with a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only) for all tables involved, and also post the results you want from that data.
Since you're asking about a DML statement, such as UPDATE, the sample data will be the contents of the table(s) before the DML, and the results will be state of the changed table(s) when everything is finished.
Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
Always say which version of Oracle you're using (e.g., 11.2.0.2.0).
See the forum FAQ: https://forums.oracle.com/message/9362002

Similar Messages

Record not inserting into the table through Forms 10g

Hi all,
I have created a form in 10g(10.1.2.0.2) based on just one table that has 4 columns(col1, col2, col3, col4).
Here col1, col2 and col3 are VARCHAR2 and col4 is date and all the columns are not null columns(There are no primary and foriegn key constrains, which means duplicates are allowed).
My form contains 2 blocks where block 1 has one text item (col1) and 3 buttons (Delete, Save, Exit).
And block2 is a database block and has col2,col3,col4 which are in tabluar layout frame displaying 10 records.
When the form is opened the cursor has to be in block1.col1 for querrying. Here i enter a value in col1, and then when I click on col2 in the block2, then I put execute_query in new_block_instance of block2, which displays the records.
The block2 properties are not updatable, insertable and query is allowed.
Everything is working good until here. But here in the block2 when I want to insert another record into the table, by navigating all the way down to the last empty record and entering the new values for col2, col3 and col4 And then Ctrl+S will display the message "*FRM-40400: Transaction complete: 1 record applied and saved.*" But actually the record is not inserted into the table.
I also disabled the col4 by setting the Enabled property to No, since while inserting new record the date have to be populated into it and it shouldnt be changed by the user. And im populating the sysdate into the new record by setting Intial Value property to *$$DATE$$*.
And another requirement which I could not work arround here is that, the col3 also should be populated with the username of the user while inserting.
please help me...

Hi Sarah,
I do not want to update the existing record. So I kept Udate Allowed to No in property palette for the items in block2.
Do I have to do this property at block level also?
I'm inserting a new record here.
Edited by: Charan on Sep 19, 2011 8:48 AM

Avoiding duplicate records while inserting into the table

Hi
I tried the following insert statement , where i want to avoid the duplicate records while inserting itself
but giving me the errror like invalid identifier, though the column exists in the table
Please let me know Where i'm doing the mistake.
INSERT INTO t_map tm(sn_id,o_id,txt,typ,sn_time)
   SELECT 100,
          sk.obj_id,
          sk.key_txt,
          sk.obj_typ,
          sysdate,
          FROM S_KEY sk
    WHERE     sk.obj_typ = 'AY'
          AND SYSDATE BETWEEN sk.start_date AND sk.end_date
          AND sk.obj_id IN (100170,1001054)
           and   not exists (select 1
                                                               FROM t_map tm1 where tm1.O_ID=tm.o_id
                                                                    and tm1.sn_id=tm.sn_id
                                                                    and tm1.txt=tm.txt
                                                                    and tm1.typ=tm.typ
                                                                    and tm1.sn_time=tm.sn_time )

Then
you have to join the table with alias tml where is that ?do you want like this?
INSERT INTO t_map tm(sn_id,o_id,txt,typ,sn_time)
   SELECT 100,
          sk.obj_id,
          sk.key_txt,
          sk.obj_typ,
          sysdate,
          FROM S_KEY sk
    WHERE     sk.obj_typ = 'AY'
          AND SYSDATE BETWEEN sk.start_date AND sk.end_date
          AND sk.obj_id IN (100170,1001054)
           and   not exists (select 1
                                                               FROM t_map tm where sk.obj_ID=tm.o_id
                                                                    and 100=tm.sn_id
                                                                    and sk.key_txt=tm.txt
                                                                    and sk.obj_typ=tm.typ
                                                                    and sysdate=tm.sn_time )

Record is not inserting into the Table thourgh forms 10g

Hi All,
I have the form built in 10g(10.1.2.0.2).
Basically the form has 2 blocks.
Block 1 with only one item, where we enter some value and hit enter(this will navigate to block2 and execute the query).
Block 2(tabular) will fetch the records. Now this block2 have 3 columns(caseid, userid, date).
Now when I insert a new record, I just need to enter the caseid only. And userid and date have to be automatically populated.
I can populate the USERID and DATE fields.
And when I enter some value in caseid item of block 2, and then do Control+S(to insert the record and Save the transaction),
i get the message saying FRM-40400: Transaction complete: 1 records applied and saved.
But when I query again for the same, I dont se the record inserted into the table.
Why is this happening?
Help please...

@ Inol
There is no promary or foriegn key relation ship. The form is fetching records from just one table. As I said block1 has col1. and Block2 has col2,3,4.
@Andreas
Yes I did select * from table, select count(*) from table in SQL*Plus. Nothing is inserted.
And one thing I have to tall here is, I have a ON-INSERT trigger in block2.
The code in ON-INSERT trigger is
-- :BLOCK2.DATE := TO_DATE(:DATE,'DD-MON-YYYY') ;
/* commented since I was populating date by assigning $$DATETIME$$ to the Initial value property of the data item. */
:BLOCK2.SOURCE_CASE := :BLOCK1.SOURCE_CASEID;Forgot to tell you,
Since I was inserting the record from block2(3 columns), to the table which has 4 columns, there is another item in block 2 which has the visible property No.
So the block 2 has 4 columns. And the hidden column will hold the value that is in the item of block1. This is what i'm pushing in the ON-INSERT trigger.
Edited by: Charan on Sep 20, 2011 1:51 PM

Trigger a process when a record is inserted into database

Hi, could someone tell me how to do the following (if it's possible):
when a record is inserted into a table in a database,
I want it to somehow trigger an action which will put an item into user's To-Do inBox of the WorkSpace,
the user can then open the form in the To-Do and use it to view the data in the newly inserted record.
this "user"'s login ID is part of the inserted record.
thanks

Mmm, trigger? I don't know of a way.
But I supposed you could have a process that has a timer that peroidically queries the database for changes and then do the same thing.
You could also perhaps write a Service and then use the Java API to start a process?
Maybe take a look here
http://blogs.adobe.com/livecycle/2010/12/how-to-invoke-a-livecycle-process-periodically.ht ml

Trigger on Insert into a custom table from external application

This is the problem I am facing.
External Application using a different schema lets say extdb on a different server. This writes into a table in a schema called appscustom schema. Appscustom schema is under Oracle Apps.
A trigger in Oracle Apps to be executed on insert into the appscustom schema table.
This trigger inturn will run a concurrent job to create the invoice and gl interface tables.
THe problem I am facing is, The trigger get executed but the concurrent job does not get triggered/run.
Here is the trigger. Let me know, what might be wrong.
THe values for vRESP_APPL_Id,vRESP_ID, vUSER_ID becomes null in the test_pims table.
Whereas when I manually insert from backend into appscustom schema table the concurrent job gets submitted.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
-- Start of DDL Script for Trigger APPS.RWJF_PIMS_ORACLE_INT
-- Generated 5/25/2005 22:10:52 from APPS@HENRY_DEVL
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER rwjf_pims_oracle_int
AFTER
INSERT
ON rwjf_pimstxnbatch
REFERENCING NEW AS NEW OLD AS OLD
FOR EACH ROW
WHEN (new.status = 'U' )
Declare
ReturnCode BOOLEAN;
ConcReqID NUMBER := 0;
vRESP_APPL_ID NUMBER;
vRESP_ID NUMBER;
vUSER_ID NUMBER;
LoadToAp NUMBER :=0;
LoadToGl NUMBER :=0;
Begin
-- vRESP_APPL_ID := apps.fnd_profile.value(200); -- AP --('RESP_APPL_ID');
-- vRESP_ID := apps.fnd_profile.value(20639); -- 20639 for payables mgr. for rwjf_payables Mgr (50001); --('RESP_ID');
-- vUSER_ID := apps.fnd_profile.value(1247); -- 1247 for sury 1065 for interface -- ('USER_ID');
LoadToAp := 0;
SELECT COUNT(*)
INTO LoadToAp
FROM rwjf.RWJF_PimsTxnBatchDtl
WHERE GL_OR_AP = 'A'
AND pims_txn_batch_id = :NEW.Pims_Txn_Batch_id;
LoadToGl := 0;
SELECT COUNT(*)
INTO LoadToGl
FROM rwjf.RWJF_PimsTxnBatchDtl
WHERE GL_OR_AP = 'G'
AND pims_txn_batch_id = :NEW.Pims_Txn_Batch_id;
IF LoadToAp > 0 THEN
vRESP_APPL_ID := 200; -- Application Id 200 Account payables
vRESP_ID := 50001; -- RWJF_Payables Mgr for user interface
vUSER_ID := 1065; -- user id for user name interface
apps.fnd_global.apps_initialize(vUSER_ID,vRESP_ID,vRESP_APPL_ID);
ConcReqID := 0;
ReturnCode := FND_REQUEST.SET_MODE(TRUE);
ConcReqID := FND_REQUEST.SUBMIT_REQUEST('RWJF',
'RWJF_PIMS_INT',
'', '', FALSE,
:NEW.Pims_Txn_Batch_id,'AP', chr(0),
END IF;
IF LoadToGl > 0 THEN
vRESP_APPL_ID := 20003;
vRESP_ID := 50003;
vUSER_ID := 1065;
apps.fnd_global.apps_initialize(vUSER_ID,vRESP_ID,vRESP_APPL_ID);
ConcReqID := 0;
ReturnCode := FND_REQUEST.SET_MODE(TRUE);
ConcReqID := FND_REQUEST.SUBMIT_REQUEST('RWJF',
'RWJF_PIMS_INT',
'', '', FALSE,
:NEW.Pims_Txn_Batch_id,'GL',chr(0),
END IF;
insert into test_pims
values
('Test3',:New.Pims_Txn_Batch_id,vUSER_ID,vRESP_ID,vRESP_APPL_ID);
insert into test_pims
values
('Test3',ConcReqID,vUSER_ID,vRESP_ID,vRESP_APPL_ID);
IF ConcReqID = 0 THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Problem Submitting Program to get pims txn batch'); /* Handle Error */
END IF;
End;
-- End of DDL Script for Trigger APPS.RWJF_PIMS_ORACLE_INT

don't quite understand the structure of your tables but it sounds similiar to a merge statement.
(contiditonally insert, update records depending on whether or not corresponding records exist)
create table custom_table
(cust_no number,
line_no number,
party_id number
create table hz_parties
as (
select 1 party_id, 'A' bill_to_location, 10 cust_no, 100 line_no from dual union
select 2, 'B', 20, 200 from dual union
select 3, 'C', 30, 300 from dual union
select 4, 'D', 40, 400 from dual
merge into custom_table t1
using (select * from hz_parties) t2
on (t1.party_id = t2.party_id)
when not matched then insert (t1.cust_no, t1.line_no, t1.party_id)
values (t2.cust_no, t2.line_no, t2.party_id);
Edited by: pollywog on Mar 5, 2010 6:52 AM

How to insert into two differents tables at the same time

Hi
I'm newer using JDev, (version 3.1.1.2 cause the OAS seems to support just the JSP 1.0)
and I want to insert into two differents tables at the same time using one view.
How can I do that ?
TIA
Edgar

Oracle 8i supports 'INSTEAD OF' triggers on object views so you could use a process similar to the following:
1. Create an object view that joins your two tables. 'CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW test AS SELECT d.deptno, d.deptname, e.empname FROM DEPT d, EMP E'.
2. Create an INSTEAD OF trigger on the view.
3. Put code in the trigger that looks at the :NEW values being processed and determines which columns should be used to INSERT or UPDATE for each table. Crude pseudo-code might be:
IF :NEW.deptno NOT IN (SELECT deptno FROM DEPT) THEN
INSERT INTO dept VALUES(:NEW.deptno, :NEW.deptname);
INSERT INTO emp VALUES (:NEW.deptno, :NEW.empname);
ELSE
IF :NEW.deptname IS NOT NULL THEN
UPDATE dept SET deptname = :NEW.deptname
WHERE deptno = :NEW.deptno;
END IF;
IF :NEW.empname IS NOT NULL THEN
UPDATE emp SET empname = :NEW.empname
WHERE deptno = :NEW.deptno;
Try something along those lines.
null

Taking More Time while inserting into the table (With foriegn key)

Hi All,
I am facing problem while inserting the values into the master table.
The problem,
Table A -- User Master Table (Reg No, Name, etc)
Table B -- Transaction Table (Foreign key reference with Table A).
While inserting the data's in Table B, i need to insert the reg no also in table B which is mandatory. I followed the logic which is mentioned in the SRDemo.
While inserting we need to query the Table A first to have the values in TableABean.java.
final TableA tableA= (TableA )uow.executeQuery("findUser",TableA .class, regNo);
Then, we need to create the instance for TableB
TableB tableB= (TableB)uow.newInstance(TableB.class);
tableB.setID(bean.getID);
tableA.addTableB(tableB); --- this is for to insert the regNo of TableA in TableB.. This line is executing the query "select * from TableB where RegNo = <tableA.getRegNo>".
This query is taking too much time if values are more in the TableB for that particular registrationNo. Because of this its taking more time to insert into the TableB.
For Ex: TableA -- regNo : 101...having less entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking less than 1 sec
regNo : 102...having more entry in TableB means...inserting record is taking more than 2 sec
Time delay is there for different users when they enter transaction in TableB.
I need to avoid this since in future it will take more time...from 2 sec to 10 sec, if volume of data increases mean.
Please help me to resolve this issue...I am facing it now in production.
Thanks & Regards
VB

Hello,
Looks like you have a 1:M relationship from TableA to TableB, with a 1:1 back pointer from TableB to TableA. If triggering the 1:M relationship is causing you delays that you want to avoid there might be two quick ways I can see:
1) Don't map it. Leave the TableA->TableB 1:M unmapped, and instead just query for relationship when you do need it. This means you do not need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA), so that the TableB->TableA relation gets set. Might not be the best option, but it depends on your application's usage. It does allow you to potentially page the TableB results or add other query query performance options when you do need the data though.
2) You are currently using Lazy loading for the TableA->TableB relationship - if it is untriggered, don't bother calling tableA.addTableB(tableB), and instead only need to call tableB.setTableA(tableA). This of course requires using TopLink api to a) verify the collection is an IndirectCollection type, and b) that it is hasn't been triggered. If it has been triggered, you will still need to call tableA.addTableB(tableB), but it won't result in a query. Check out the oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectContainer class and it's isInstantiated() method. This can cause problems though in highly concurrent environments, as other threads may have triggered the indirection before you commit your transaction, so that the A->B collection is not up to date - this might require refreshing the TableA if so.
Change tracking would probably be the best option to use here, and is described in the EclipseLink wiki:
http://wiki.eclipse.org/Introduction_to_EclipseLink_Transactions_(ELUG)#Attribute_Change_Tracking_Policy
Best Regards,
Chris

Record not inserting into sap table with connector framework ?

here is the code, but record not being inserting into the table ... but same piece of code working fine while updating ... the record ...
try {
interaction = connection.createInteractionEx();
IInteractionSpec interactionSpec = interaction.getInteractionSpec();
String functionName = "Z_XYZ";
interactionSpec.setPropertyValue("Name", functionName);
String writingTable = "MYTABLE";
RecordFactory rf = interaction.getRecordFactory();
MappedRecord importParams = rf.createMappedRecord("input");
importParams.put("ATTR1", "VALUE1");
importParams.put("ATTR2", "VALUE2");
IFunction function = connection.getFunctionsMetaData().getFunction(functionName);
IStructureFactory sf = interaction.retrieveStructureFactory();
IRecordSet table = (IRecordSet) sf.getStructure(function.getParameter(writingTable).getStructure());
table.insertRow();
table.setString("ATNAME", "VALUE");
table.setString("ATWRT", "VALUE");
importParams.put(writingTable, table);
MappedRecord output = (MappedRecord) interaction.execute(interactionSpec, importParams);
} catch (Exception e) {
any idea?
than ks
MMK

Hi Mohan,
Does a creation through SE37 with the same input work?
Yoav.

Multi-table mapping is not inserting into the primary table first.

I have an inheritance mapping where the children are mapped to the parent table oids with the "Multi-Table Info" tab.
One of children is not inserting properly. Its insert is attempting to insert into one of the tables from the "Additional Tables" of "Multi-Table Info" instead of the primary table that it is mapped to.
The other children insert correctly. This child is not much different from those.
I looked through the forums, but found nothing similiar.

I would expect the Children to be inserted into both the primary table and the Additional Table? Is the object in question inserted into the primary table at all? Is the problem that it is being inserted into the Additional Table first? If it is, are the primary key names different? Is it a foreign key relationship?
If the object in question has no fields in the additional table is it mapped to the additional table? (it should not be)
Perhaps providing the deployment XML will help determine the problem,
--Gordon

XSQL Insert into Schema based Table

Hi,
I am struggling with this one:
My test XML is well formed:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<SC_ESP>
<ResultSet>
<ApplicationID>App0001</ApplicationID>
<Reason>Sucess</Reason>
</ResultSet>
</SC_ESP>
Whan I try to POST this XML data via the XSQL Servlet
I get the following error:
"Character '$' is not allowed in a XML tag name."
Anyone (Mark ?) know what it means ?
Thanks
Martin

Hello Mark,
I don't know which time zone you are in but thanks for the very prompt replies.
All I am trying to with this test is provide an XML input test facility via HTTP. The users are supposed to paste the XML into a TextAre using their browser and have that data inserted into the corresponding Table(s) via the XSQL servlet.
The XML schema have already been registered but I note from your other reply that I have not added the annotation xdb:storeVarrayAsTable="true" to the schema tags.
It is worth noting that the whole thing works if I create a simple table that is NOT related to an XML Shema.
You say that you have not had to use the XSQl Servlet. Would you care to say what approach you would use for the above requirement. Shall I set about writing my own Servlet to do this.

Inserts into Global Temporary Table

I'm working on using a global temporary table in one of my apps. I have a small test run here to isolate the problem. It simply creates the global temporary table, inserts a row, commits and then does a select to see if the insert worked. No data shows in the table when running this. I don't know much about global temp tables, so any help would be appreciated.
CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE AGENT_SILO.AS_TEMP_VALIDATE (
SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID NUMBER,
CURRENT_FLAG char(1),
EFFECTIVE_START date,
EFFECTIVE_END date
) ON COMMIT DELETE ROWS;
INSERT INTO AGENT_SILO.AS_TEMP_VALIDATE(SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID, CURRENT_FLAG, EFFECTIVE_START, EFFECTIVE_END)
VALUES(0, '', SYSDATE, SYSDATE);
commit;
SELECT * FROM AGENT_SILO.AS_TEMP_VALIDATE;

So I wonder what else I'm doing wrong that's really obvious. Here's what i'm trying to accomplish and maybe there's a better way of going about it.
I have a trigger that is supposed to do some validation before the insert is allowed to go through. So here's my approach. I have a trigger fired when there's an insert into the AS_Employee_history table. This passes some of the fields from this insert into a proc (the id, a flag and a couple of dates). Within the proc, i create a global temp table, insert these passed values into the temp table. Then I have a cursor to basically copy the rows from the as_employee_history table that have the same id. Then I can do some selects on the temp table to see if it passes the validation.
I have outputs throughout for debugging and it gets to right after the inserts into the temp table, then the rest of the code doesn't appear to be executed. So it looks like it's failing at the execution of select statements on the temp table. Anything else obvious that I"m missing here?
Here's my proc.
PROCEDURE "PAS_VALIDATE" (STATUS OUT VARCHAR2, v_status OUT BOOLEAN, NEW_SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID IN NUMBER,
NEW_CURRENT_FLAG IN CHAR, NEW_EFFECTIVE_START IN DATE,
NEW_EFFECTIVE_END IN DATE)
IS
v_prev_effective_end date;
v_flag_count number;
v_flag_count_date number;
--variables to store dynamic sql returns
v_sql_flag_count_date varchar2(255);
v_sql_flag_count varchar2(255);
v_sql_prev_eff_end varchar2(255);
cursor c_row is
select * from AGENT_SILO.AS_EMPLOYEE_HISTORY EMP
where (EMP.SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID = NEW_SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID);
r_row c_row%ROWTYPE;
BEGIN
Status := 'Started';
v_status := true;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Creating temporary table...');
execute immediate 'CREATE GLOBAL TEMPORARY TABLE AGENT_SILO.AS_TEMP_VALIDATE (
SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID NUMBER,
CURRENT_FLAG char(1),
EFFECTIVE_START date,
EFFECTIVE_END date
) ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS';
     DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Validating the data...');
     --DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Inserting submitted row into temp table');
--Insert the new row being submitted from user into the temp table
execute immediate 'INSERT INTO AGENT_SILO.AS_TEMP_VALIDATE(SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID, CURRENT_FLAG, EFFECTIVE_START, EFFECTIVE_END)
VALUES(' || NEW_SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID || ',
''' || NEW_CURRENT_FLAG || ''',
to_date(''' || to_char(NEW_EFFECTIVE_START, 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss') || ''', ''mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss''),
to_date(''' || to_char(NEW_EFFECTIVE_END, 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss') || ''', ''mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss''))';
--Insert the other rows to we end up with a subset of the employee history table
--with only rows that match the sbi_employee_id of the submitted row
     --DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Inserting into temp table...');
open c_row;
loop
fetch c_row into r_row;
exit when c_row%NOTFOUND;
execute immediate 'INSERT INTO AGENT_SILO.AS_TEMP_VALIDATE(SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID, CURRENT_FLAG, EFFECTIVE_START, EFFECTIVE_END)
VALUES(' || r_row.SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID || ',
''' || r_row.CURRENT_FLAG || ''',
to_date(''' || to_char(r_row.EFFECTIVE_START, 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss') || ''', ''mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss''),
to_date(''' || to_char(r_row.EFFECTIVE_END, 'mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss') || ''', ''mm/dd/yyyy hh:mi:ss''))';
end loop;
close c_row;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('After inserts');
-----Store queries to determine values for validation--------------------------
v_sql_prev_eff_end := 'SELECT to_char(max(effective_end), ''dd-mon-yy'')
FROM AGENT_SILO.AS_TEMP_VALIDATE
where to_char(EFFECTIVE_END, ''dd-mon-yy'') != ''31-dec-99'' AND
SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID = NEW_SBI_EMPLOYEE_ID';
--Find the largest effective_end, besides the 9999 value
execute immediate v_sql_prev_eff_end into v_prev_effective_end;
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('The highest previous end date: ' || v_prev_effective_end);
--...........Validation testing...........
execute immediate 'DROP TABLE AGENT_SILO.AS_TEMP_VALIDATE'; --Drop temp table
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Validation Procedure Complete');
COMMIT;
status:='Success';
EXCEPTION
When Others Then
ROLLBACK;
Status := SQLERRM;
END;
Thanks a bunch for helping a noob out.

Inserting into a base table of a materialized view takes lot of time.......

Dear All,
I have created a materialized view which refreshes on commit.materialized view is enabled query rewrite.I have created a materialized view log on the base table also While inserting into the base table it takes lot of time................Can u please tell me why?

Dear Rahul,
Here is my materialized view..........
create materialized view mv_test on prebuilt table refresh force on commit
enable query rewrite as
SELECT P.PID,
SUM(HH_REGD) AS HH_REGD,
SUM(INPRO_WORKS) AS INPRO_WORKS,
SUM(COMP_WORKS) AS COMP_WORKS,
SUM(SKILL_WAGE) AS SKILL_WAGE,
SUM(UN_SKILL_WAGE) AS UN_SKILL_WAGE,
SUM(WAGE_ADVANCE) AS WAGE_ADVANCE,
SUM(MAT_AMT) AS MAT_AMT,
SUM(DAYS) AS DAYS,
P.INYYYYMM,P.FIN_YEAR
FROM PROG_MONTHLY P
WHERE SUBSTR(PID,5,2)<>'PP'
GROUP BY PID,P.INYYYYMM,P.FIN_YEAR;
Please help me if query enable rewrite does any performance degradation......
Thanks & Regards
Kris

ORA-22275 inserting into the CLOB column using ODBC input parameters

Hi all,
I'm having problem with INSERT into the CLOB column via bound input parameters.
After calling SQLExecDirect() I'm getting following error:
[Oracle][ODBC][Ora]ORA-22275: invalid LOB locator specified
Adding defaults to the table definitions does not help. If I embed parameter values into the SQL statement - everything works just fine.
I use Oracle 9.2 with latest Oracle ODBC driver 9.2.0.4 under Windows XP.
Any ideas appreciated...
Vlad
Code looks like this:
SQLBindParameter(hstmt,1,...);
SQLBindParameter(hstmt,2,...);
SQLBindParameter(hstmt,3,...);
SQLExecDirect(hstmt,...);
SQL statement looks like this:
insert into tst_table (id,str_fld,clob_fld1,clob_fld2) values (50, ? , ? , ?)
Table looks like this:
CREATE TABLE tst_table (
     id          number (10,0)     NOT NULL ,
     str_fld          nvarchar2 (50)     NOT NULL ,
     clob_fld1     nclob          NOT NULL ,
     clob_fld2     nclob          NOT NULL ,
     CONSTRAINT PK_tst_table PRIMARY KEY
          id
I tried to add defaults to the table, but result is the same:
CREATE TABLE tst_table (
     id          number (10,0)               NOT NULL ,
     str_fld          nvarchar2 (50)               NOT NULL ,
     clob_fld1     nclob     default EMPTY_CLOB()     NOT NULL ,
     clob_fld2     nclob     default EMPTY_CLOB()     NOT NULL ,
     CONSTRAINT PK_tst_table PRIMARY KEY
          id

You need to provide the data at execution time (i.e. SQL_LEN_DATA_AT_EXEC(0) in the SQLBindParameter followed by a series of SQLPutData calls). If you go to Metalink
Top Tech Docs | Oracle ODBC Driver | Scripts & Sample Code
has some sample code that shows you how to do this.
Justin

How to select data from 3rd row of Excel to insert into Sql server table using ssis

Hi,
Iam having Excel files with headers in first two rows , i want two skip that two rows and select data from 3rd row to insert into Sql Server table using ssis.3rd row is having column names.

CUSTOMER DETAILS
REGION
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4 COL5 COL6 COL7
COL8 COL9 COL10 COL11
1 XXX yyyy zzzz
2 XXX yyyy zzzzz
3 XXX yyyy zzzzz
4 XXX yyyy zzzzz
First two rows having cells merged and with headings in excel , i want two skip the first two rows and select the data from 3rd row and insert into sql server using ssis
Set range within Excel command as per below
See
http://www.joellipman.com/articles/microsoft/sql-server/ssis/646-ssis-skip-rows-in-excel-source-file.html
Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
Please Mark This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
Visakh
My MSDN Page
My Personal Blog
My Facebook Page

Writing a trigger to update the QOH in a Parts table for for each item of the order whenever the order is filled. The trigger is for the OrderItem table when an item record is inserted into the OrderItem table.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for