Wrong Base amount calculated for JEC1 & JSEP

Hello All,
I am using TAXINN procedure, while creating a PO, in invoice tab, BED (JMOP) is getting calculated correctly, but for JEC1 ( 2% Edu Cess) & JSEP (1% H&SEcess) , the base value is calculated wrongly, and because if this the duty amount is shown less.
For e.g. Base Value -----     100000
JMOP (10%) -                     10000
JEC1 (2%) -                             20
JSEP(1%) -                             10
When i check base value for JEC1 and JSEP it it taking as 1000 instead of 10000. I have maintained the condition records in FV11 .
Please help
Regards,
Vikas

Hi Vikas,
Please check in OBQ3 what is the "From" field of JEC1 and JSEP. This should be the step denoting JMOP.
Regards
Binoy

Similar Messages

Wrong base amount calculation for entry tax

Hi,
We want to capture entry tax in PO with condition type ENT1. The issue appearing for the condition is that the Base value calculated to calculating the ENT1 is (Base Value + Excise + 2 * VAT). Where as the propser calculation should be (Base Value + Excise + VAT).
For example -
Base Value - 1000
Excise (BED + ECS + SECESS) - 10.3
VAT (4%) - 4
Sub Total - 1014.30
Entry tax (2%) - 20.29
Where the entry tax getting calculated is 20.37 considering VAT as 8 (2 * 4). We want the entry tax as 20.29.
How can we achieve this?
Regards,
Prashant

Hi Vikas,
Please check in OBQ3 what is the "From" field of JEC1 and JSEP. This should be the step denoting JMOP.
Regards
Binoy

Tax Base Amount calculated wrongly

Dear Friends,
While posting a MIRO with a manually enter tax base amount, the amount doubles whenever I click on another tab like basic data and come back to tac base amount.
For e.g. I have a PO for 10000, now I am posting an invoice for the same but I have to pay only 9000 to the vendor because 1000 has been deducted as a penalty for late delivery.
Now I enter a MIRO, with reference to the purchase order and enter 9000 in the line item and trying to enter 10000 in the field Tax Base amount under the Tax tab.
Now whenever I change tabs, i.e if I go to Basic data and come back to Tax Tab, the amount has been changed to 19000. If change tabs again, it changes to 28000 and so on...
Not sure if this is a bug or has anyone faced this issue? Can anyone suggest a note or a solution...
Thanks,
Hari Dharen

Thank you Mani Kumar,
But that's what we already have in customizing:
The problem is that during Invoice Verification (MIRO) we specified that only one of the items is eligible to Cash Discount (we set for item #2 that it is W/o Cash Discount):
The invoice is posting correctly identifying the correct disc. amount of 1,500 (50,000*3%):
The problem is during the Payment Run where the system determines a Cash Discount that applies but when calculating the W/Tax Base Amount it do the following:
51,000*3% = 1,530
W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,530 = 49,470 usd
F110 Proposal generated:
It is false that the Cash Discount applies to all items, the expected result should be:
(only eligible items for Cash Discount) 50,000*3% = 1,500
W/Tax Base = 51,000 - 1,500 = 49,500 usd not 49,470
Thanks

How is exempt amount calculated for involuntary deductions?

How is the exempt amount calculated for involuntary deductions?
For child support CHILD_SUPP_CALCULATION_FORMULA fast formula can be used for getting the exempt amount?
What about other involuntary deductions like alimony, creditor debt, bankruptcy?
Can anyone please guide me to any documents concerning this.
Regards,
Manish.

When you define the deduction using the Deduction template, the formula are automatically get defined.
Ex in your case Creditor debt is an involuntary deduction and it should be paid using the third party payment, the priority of this deduction will be 1 and you also might need to define external organization to pay this amount.
You can refer the payroll user guide which might provide you few details of the involuntary deduction

Tax Base amount calculation in MIRO

Hi friends ,
Need your help on the following issue
1.     PO item price is Rs 20/- & Tax is 7 % . But Tax 7 % should be calculated on                 Rs 100/- (20+80 =100) in MIRO . i.e. Assessable value for tax is Rs 100/-
2.     We tried this scenario in the following way .
      Enter the tax amount as Rs 7/- (7% on Rs 100/) ,
      Do not ticket u201CCalculate taxu201D ,
      Enter the u201CTotal Amountu201D as Rs 27/- ( Rs 20+7)can put
It is working fine. But when we take report to submit government officials, for this PO line item the assessable value is showing as Rs 20/- (PO value) and the tax 7% on this assessable value shows as Rs 1.4/- though the tax value is Rs 7/- .
Could some one help how to face this issue
Thx
Deva

If your tax procedure is TAXINN,
Define new condition type with Cond Class B & Cal Type C.
Define new condtion table and access sequence for this condition type.
Include this tax condition type in Tax procedure.
It is to be included next to BASB. This condition type to be maintained as statistical in TAXINN.
Maintain condition record on required combination.
In third step of TAXINN, give the summation of BASB & new condition type.
Use this third step as the assessable value for tax calculation.
In your case,
STEP       Condition type            Value
10            BASB                     = 20                  (From PO Item Price)
20            New condition type   = 80                 (From condition Record)
30            Assesable Value      = 100               (STEP 10 + STEP 20)
40            Tax condition type    =    7                  (7% FROM STEP 40)
Then go for PO-GR-MIRO as regular procedure.
Hope this works for you.

EXC BASE AMOUNT CALCULATED ON WHAT BASIS? (J1IEX)

When I display excise document in J1IEX in TAB Duty value Exc. Base field is there.
Can some one tell me on what basis system calculates this base value.
Better if you can give example.
Thanks,
Dhananjaya
Edited by: Dhananjayappa E on Jan 12, 2009 4:39 PM

hi
it is the net amount on which the excise to be calculated
this value is get picked up from the value we are giving in the po and on which GR is happening
like
condition value in PO 100 inr
this will be the base value
on this system will calculate excise as 10 inr and respectively 2 and 1 % cess
regards
kunal

Withholding tax base amount is wrong for sales invoice

Dear Gurus,
we had generated invoice for cop (colombia paiso) 1377350 as follows
sales a/c cr         1080000
sales a/c cr             90000
sales a/c cr           114400
sales a/c cr            92950
vat     a/c cr            33176
w/h   a/c dr            36911(withholding tax account)
customer a/c dr 1373615
The wiholding tax rate is 3.5%. it is applicble only for first line for cop 1080000. we had applied withholding condition to that line only. The vat amount cop 33176 is 16% on cop(92950+114400). There is no withholding tax or vat on line for cop 90000. when we post the invoice, the withholdng tax base amount change from 1080000 to 1054598 and system post the wihholdng tax for cop 36911 instead of 37800. In sales invoice there is no possibility to change the base amount mannually in condition. it is grey area.
we had check the configuration part about maxmimum amount,minimum amount,withholding tax base amount,calculation procedure.withholding tax type,withholding tax code. Nothing is found wrong.
you early answer is highly appreciated
Reagrd,
Rajesh K

Hi
Cheque Go to Menubar of which document you have to post for getting the WHT value Menubar Settings - editing options - remove the tick calculate tax on net amount.
Rgds
Vani

Base amount for calculating duties in import

hi all,
while doing MIGO for imports (ECC 6) , we are capturing excise invoice . in the excise details tab for item , we are getting all the duties ( CVD,ECESS,SECESS ACD ) correctly, but the base amount showing wrong. can any body tell me , how & from where it picking the value.
thanks
laxman

HI,
Check from to and step for condition type tax procedure in OBYZ.
reward if helpful,
Regards,
Chetan.

Wrong depreciation calculated for base value 04 + EA-FIN activated

Hi,
after activating EA-FIN, depreciation for assets using base value 04 (= half of replacement value) is calculated wrong.
While AW01 for a particular asset shows depreciation values based on the FULL replacement value (like it would be base value 03) AW01_AFAR (the u201Coldu201D asset explorer) shows the correct depreciation for base value 04.
The wrong base value can also be seen using the "display depreciation calculation" button in both transactions.
There are no enhancements for base value determination active.
I didnu2019t find any SAPNET notes nor SCN entries regarding this case, any ideas?
Best regards, Christian

For what it's worth, I did a search and didn't find anything either.
It sounds like you've already tried this, but if the base value (the actual $$ value) is different in the trace on both tcodes then you have a problem. I would be sure to recalculate the values when you enter AW01 and AW01_AFAR to ensure that it's correct before looking at the trace.
The formula for the replacement value is:
( u_ganlc-kansw + u_ganlc-answl +
               u_ganlc-kmafa + u_ganlc-mafav + u_ganlc-zusma +
               u_ganlc-mafam + u_ganlc-mafal +
               u_ganlc-kaufw + u_ganlc-aufwv +
               u_ganlc-aufwp + u_ganlc-aufwl ) / 2 .
I'd look at ANLC for the asset and do the calculation yourself to confirm the value.
You've probably done all of that so I predict an OSS message in your future !
-nathan

Base amount for tax calculation in billing document

Dear Experts,
Can you help me in this scenario
when i create a billing document
Selling Price :74,766.36
Output Tax: 5233.65
Final Amount: 80,000.01
the total should be 80,000 in this case as per customer PO.
the actual difference is coming from Tax rounding off done by SAP.Initially we added DIFF condition to adjust the Tax amount.
But it is affecting the Output VAT report, where it shows 0.01 values. business does not want that, so we added DIFF condition to Selling Price.
Net                 74,766.35 THB
Tax                  5,233.65
This is how it post to accounting
01 8000485 Custome. 80,000.00
50 2100100 Revenue Gds - Dom 74,766.36-
50 2623600 Output Tax 5,233.65-
40 2100100 Revenue Gds - Dom 0.01
But the base amount for tax calculation is not chaning even after adding DIFF condition.
   Tax amount         Base amnt           Tx   Tax ra
    5,233.65-          74,766.36-           O7    7.000
           Output Tax rate 7%
Is it possible to change the base amount for tax calculation to include DIFF value?
Can you please advise? If i maintain Tax condition at header level, does this solve it.
Regards
Pradeep

Hi,
Please check your condition type settings for Rounding Rule
may be it is marked as commercial
mark as B and check it might work

Tax procedure for VAT calculation on Base amount + WHT amount

Hi All,
Needed your inputs on definition of tax procedure, to calculate VAT tax where base amount + withholding tax amount are tax base components.
E.g. in AR line item:
     Revenue: 950 (FB70 ->Editing options: calculate taxes on net amount check box is enabled)
     WHT: 50 (5%) (Re-grossing method using)
     VAT: 70 (7%)
To achieve as above how to define tax procedure: current procedure definition as below.
StepCounter-Ctyp----Description-From--To
100--0---     -BASB--Base Amount
117--0---     -J1W1Output Tax----100
118--0MWS1-Subtotal--100----117
120--0---     -MWASOutput Tax------118
Please through some light on this.
Thanks in advance.
SK

Dear all,
Any comments please.
Highly appreciated calculating VAT tax on base amount and WHT (re-grossing up).
Thanks in advance.
SK

BSET-HWBAS Tax Base Amount is wrong / double

Dear Experts,
We have a scenario where in IDOC comes from External system to SAP for posting. We are using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST for doing the postings. I have nearly passed all the necessary parameters but still the Tax base amount in BSET is wrong. And it happens only for one tax code only.
I have passed the GL Account details, Currency amount and Tax amount details. For each tax line I am also filling the the relevant item number i.e. BAPIACTX09-ITEMNO_TAX.
Can you please suggest solution for this issue. I have tried to serach SAP notes + SDN post but could not get suitable solution.
The current issue is as follows:
40200001 AB      103,11- (i.e. 20% tax)
75003000 VN       90,00-   (i.e. 10% tax)
34000000 AB       20,62-   (i.e. tax calculated). Here I have entered only the tax items. The currency balance with other entries is zero.
But when I have a look at Environment--> Tax Data then it shows Tax Base amount for "AB" as 206.22 (i.e. 1033.11 x 2). The tax base amount for VN is right as 90.
Kindly advise.
-Abhishek

Solved by myself.
Refer SAP Note 626235 for details. The Tax by-pass for BKPF-AWTYP was switched off. This customization is maintained in table TAX_APPLI.

Tax Calculation on Base amount in FB60

Dear All,
My client wants to calculate tax on base amount in FB60,
he receives invoice from vendor with 6 items(i.e., 6 different types of expenses gl)
and in that invoice he get the total tax amount not individual tax amount, here is the example :
item 1       - 1402.50
item 2       - 855.50
item 3       - 3780.00
Sub total   - 6038.00
Tax 19%   - 1147.22 (tax amount for above 3 items)
Total       - 7185.22
In FB60 the system is calculating the tax on net value i.e., we have to enter the total amount (7185.22) in header level and line item we have to enter the amount including the tax value
item 1     - 1668.98 (1402.50 x 19%) - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same.
item 2     - 1078.05 (855.50x 19%) - - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same
item 3     - 4498.20 (3780 x 19%) - - user calculating the tax manually and entering the same
he is getting this type of invoices more and he dont want to do calculation for each and every item
Please advice on this issue as early as possible.
Thanks in advance
Regards
JS

Thanks a lot Pascol
Regards
JS

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

Base amount in capturing of excise duty wrong

hi all,
by mistake user put base amount wrong while capturing excise invoice .now i want to cancel it but posting is allready done for vendor so cancellation is not possible. how can i change the base amount
plz tell me urgent
regards,
sujit

Dear Sujit,
I fyou have already posted the Excise Invoice, then follow the below steps,
1. Cancel the material document
2. With canceled material document number - Post the Excise invioce with refernce to cancled Document. Then Part II duties get reversed.
3. Then go to J1IEX and cancel the Excise invoice
4. Then Post the correct excise invioce and remaining steps.
Thanks,
Krishna Reddy

Wrong Base amount calculated for JEC1 & JSEP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for