Wrong column entries

Hi,
I´ve a table where one column(status) includes wrong values. Stuff like this:
NC€CESSED
’@CESSED
jã€CESSED
thats all the same: PROCESSED! No other table or column is concerned.
Our driver (9.0.2.0.0) shows all data correct, if we are using the right statement, so we have no problems in production.
The right statement includes an select on all possible column values
Example:
select ... from confirmation where reserved = ... and status in('CREATED','PROCESSING FAILED','PROCESSED', 'PROCESSING')
Next one is´nt usable because cryptic data for column status would be returned:
select ... from confirmation where reserved = ...
What is the problem with this column?
THX for help. Marcus

Hi,
You can check; Number of incorrect logons for a user after which the logon procedure will terminate using this parameter.
in rz11 ,
login/fails_to_session_end
These parameters may help you.
http://help.sap.com/crmcg_en/22/41c43ac23cef2fe10000000a114084/content.htm
My question is there any way we can look the user account wrong password entries and how many times they entered the wrong password.
I don't think this is possible - to cheek , how many times the user entered the wrong password.
Even if possible , those types of messages should appear in the system log - sm21
Regards

Similar Messages

Managed Metadata appearing in wrong columns after Restoring a site to a new Site Collection

I've restored a site with some libraries that have Managed Metadata (MM) columns from one site collection into another site collection inside the same web app so it should all subscribe to the same Managed Metadata
Service Application.
There are two MM columns in one library, one holds a single value which is what type of document it is, the other is a general tag field that allows the user to add multiple MM values to it if they want.
What we've found is that data has randomly disappeared on some MM fields, on others it appears in the wrong column, and in other cases it appears fine.
I used native out of the box GUI backup and restored with the command line,
I've done it twice with the same result, so it’s not a one off corruption during backup. It's the same story in a different doc library based on different term sets as well.
Of all the things to not work properly, MM was probably last on my list to expect, it's knocked my confidence in it a bit, as well as worried me about future upgrades.
If anyone has any ideas over what may be the cause of this, it would be appreciated, I've read lots of blogs, but nothing quite like this has cropped up.
Thanks,
Jon

Most of the ISV offerings will allow you to 'Migrate' content from one SP location to another. I'm pretty sure AvePoint and a few others have tools specifically developed for shifting bits and pieces around SharePoint farms.
It is a limitation but the ISV tools tend to do a good job and maintain nearly full consistency.
There's scripts around that can do much/most of the migration and you could always extend them to do the same things as the ISV migration tools however the cost to do so can quickly get to the same ballpark as buying an already made tool.
Paul is also in the London office, we often work together when projects requiring his brains and my beauty crop up.

Wrong Accounting entries in Import Procurement

Hi SAP Experts,
I m facing 2 issues of wrong accounting entries in Import procurement.
1) Vendor field is not showing while making PO in item Condition details for Additional duty condition type.
2) Secondly the accounting entries may be coming wrong in GR, for ur Ref:
PO- details with Acc keys mentioned for Condition types
P001
Ex works Price
100
USD
1
NO
1,000.00
ZINS
Ins Charges Val/Qty
6
USD
1
NO
60
FR1
ZFRA
Sea/Air Frieght
6
USD
6
FR1
ZFRI
Freight Inland
1
USD
1
FR1
ZGRS
% Gross
12
USD
12
FR1
Assessable Value
107.9
USD
1
NO
1,079.00
JCDB
IN Basic customs
10
107.90
FR3
JCV1
IN CVD
3
35.61
FR3
ZECS
Education Cess
2
0.71
FR3
ZSEC
Secondary Edu. Cess
1
0.36
FR3
ZSAD
Additional Duties
1
12.24
FR3
Total
123.58
USD
1
NO
1,235.82
ZCLR
Clearing Charges
4
49.43
FR3
SKTO
Cash Discount
0
0
Total Landed Cost
128.53
USD
1
NO
1,285.25
& when i did MIGO below mentioned entries occurred.
1
89
22623000
O&M MAT-TRANSFORMERS
1,285.25
USD
2
96
22200000
GR/IR CLG A/C-DOM
1,081.74-
USD
3
50
99600001
FREIGHT CLEARING
60.00-
USD
4
96
99600001
FREIGHT CLEARING
107.90-
USD
5
96
99600001
FREIGHT CLEARING
35.61-
USD
Here only JCDB, JCV1 & ZINS amounts are going to freight clearing, rest is adding in GR/IR clearing account.
Why is it so?

Hi Dhinakaraj,
We have assigned Freight clearing accounts to tax accounts for testing purpose only, as FI guy was not here, n we are not getting any GL account for enteries check, we will change it later on with the exact tax accounts, but my question is that i have assigned accr keys to 10 condition types (4 FR1 & 6 FR3) ideally these conditions should hit frieght clearing account at the time of GR, but only few are hitting ( JCDB, JCV1 & ZINS ), why it is so ?
The GR/IR Account entry value should be 1000.00-
Correct me if i am wrong.

Delete command in SQLPLUS by use wrong column name command

Assume I have three table T1,T2 and T3 shown as follow...
sql> desc T1 ;
cusid number
name varchar2(50)
sql> select * from T1;
cusid name
1) 101 TEST1
2) 102 TEST2
3) 103 TEST3
4) 104 TEST4
sql>desc T2;
ref_cusid number
sql>select * from T2
cusid
1) 103
if I want to delete account in T1 that deleted account is in T2.
I must use query1 , it will work
query1::>
delete from T1 where cusid in (select ref_cusid from T2);
but if i type wrong by this command
query2::>
delete from T1 where cusid in (select cusid from T2);
in query 2,it should be have warning message because field cusid is not in T2.Right ? But it will delete all account in table T1.
compare query2 with query 3,
query3::>
delete from T1 where cusid in (select field_test from T2);
it will show warning message like 'ORA-00904: "FIELD_TEST": invalid identifier'
I noticed that in query2 and query3 , Different Thing is query 2 wrong column name in T2 has same name as column in T1. I wonder why it is.

I doubt very much if this is really what you did:
sql>desc T2;
ref_cusid number
sql>select * from T2
cusid
1) 103The desc command shows a column name ref_cusid. The select command shows a column title cusid, not ref_cusid.
You start by saying that you have 3 tables, without doing anything with T3. Are you sure you you haven't mixed up a copy and paste somewhere?

Wrong Accounting Entry for Rejection Excise Invoice through J1IS

Dear Experts,
When we are doing Rejection of Excise Invoice through J1IS, a wrong accounting entry is getting generated by system.
Where can I check the settings for Accounting Entry for Rejection Excise Invoice?
Thanks & Regards,
Reshma

Generally Excise Invoice for other invoice posting will be done through J1IV after creating Excise Invoice for other Movements in J1IS.
If Automatic Posting is activated against your excise group then you need not again to post J1IV. It happens along with J1IS.
By the by how you are returning Excisable goods through Return delivery with Original invoice 122 or through Return Purchase order 161 Movement type.
Have you entered Excise Rates BED, ECS and SECS in J1IS?
Elaborate in detail.

Wrong column-headline in se16n after adjustment in view (se11)

Hi together,
When I´ve just created a view in trx. se11 I made little typo when I entered the name of a view field.
Although I´ve adjusted this error, se16n still shows the wrong column headline.
I´ve already deleted the view and created it again...nothing changes. In se16 erverything is OK.
Thanks for any help

Hi,
This might be because of buffering issue. There is a standard program for deleting the ALV buffers. Don't remember the name. You can search in SCN for this.
Try to logoff and relogin. Ideally it should work.
Also you can debug SE16N and see from where the field cat is coming. I think it uses buffering parameters.
Thanks,
Vinod.

Wrong Part2 Entry for GRPO IP transaction

Hi,
I want to avail the 100% ADC which is passed by the dealer, it is import purchase from domestic dealer,
So I Captured and Posted Excise Invoice in MIGO, with selecting IP sub transaction,
But the part2 entries shows wrong Accounting entry , The accounting document generated for last line item only, I have two line item in MIGO, there is no accounting entry for first line item,
I also checked the J_1IPART2 and J_1IEXCHDR table , but values were different for BED,
I reproduced the same scenario in testing, and found that when you have only one item in MIGO the entries were correct, but if there were more than one item in MIGO that time the accounting entry generated for only last line item
Need your help on this issue,

Dear KJ,
Can you check PO for both line items JEXC and JADC has value.
Refer the note.
964190
- ADC on domestic purchase of imported goods
Check whether you are following correct process from this note.
Regards
Binoy

Wrong accounting entry for FRB2 (Freight Value)

Dear All,
Wrong accounting entry is happening for Freight value for a standard PO.
Rs. 300 was maintained in PO for this condition type, GR is done for full qty. but Accounting entry is Material cccount Rs. 156.24 to Freight clearing account.
Please help me on this issue
Regards
Prashant Atri

PO was created with 3 line items with each line item having freight condition type FRB2 - Freight value
For first line item it is Rs.200 for 1,008 quantity
For Second line item it is Rs.300 for 7,200 quantity
For Third line item it is Rs.300 for 2,604 quantity
GR was done for 3rd line item for the entire PO quantity 2604, but the frieght value is flowing only Rs. 156.24
1) Material is valuated at Standard Price.
It is Valuated at MAP
2)Condition type- FRB2- Rs 300 is entered at the Header Level and it is marked as a Group condition because of which it got apportioned to all the line items in the Purchase Order.
It is entered line itemwise with Rs.300 to the third particular line item and there is wrong flow of freight value for other line items too in GR.
Is Freight Condition type is a header condition and also check is it a group condition ( in t.code: M/06)
It is a header condition but not group condition and the values for frieght were given line item wise.
Need help to resolve this.
Edited by: prashantatri on Sep 2, 2011 12:14 PM
Edited by: prashantatri on Sep 2, 2011 12:15 PM

Cancel the Credit memo genarating wrong accounting entry

Hello,
We are facing when we Cancel sales credit memo credit memo genarating wrong accounting document entry in production system.
Same scenorio i have replicated in quality system and working fine.
I have checked the billing type for credit memo s1 and cancel credit memo in quality system and production system configuration is same why it' hitting wrongly.
Cancel credit memo is hitting document type RV instead of AB in production system but same it's correctly in quality system.
I have checked the oba7,vofa.
Please provide the clarification.
Regards,
Satya

Hello,
For document type RV we have maintained reverse document type AB.
For document type AB we have maintained reverse document type AB.
S1 is billing document type we can not map in OBA7 with documen type RV.
Please give me your inputs.
regards,
Satya

How to check 3 consecutive wrong password entries

Hi to All,
I'm new to jsp. I've created a login page using
String user = request.getParameter("username");
String pwd = request.getParameter("pass");
String query = "select * from userinfo where username='" + user + "' and pass='" + pwd + "'";It's working fine. Now assuming that when the user enters the wrong password for 3 consecutive time means the username should be locked in the database. My table fields are username and password.
How can i do this. Plese suggest me an idea.
Thanks in Advance.

Why not using a 'locked_until' date column in the DB?
In the 'business bean' you simple count 'login_attempts' and if too may failed logins you lock the user in the DB.
Example:
If login_attempts>3 then
- execute: "update user set locked_until = sysdate + 1/(24*4) where username = ?"
- reset login_attempts
- show warning: "you cannot login for 15 minutes"
Just my 2 cents...

WRONG GR ENTRY

Hi friends following is the situation of wrong entry of GR.
P.O. QTY of bearings ordered : 100 (Tolerance limit 10% )
Vendor has supplied supplied 7% less and intimated the same (supplied is 93 nos)
But during MIGO by mistake it was done for 107 numbers (7% more).
Is there any way with out doing MBST so that no additional accounting doc. generated and minimal mat docs generated.
thanks in advance
Radha

Hello Radha,
You have two choise to make the entry correct (Physical inventory is not a good idea).
1. Cancle the original material document and recreate GR document for correct quantity
2. Create one more material document with 102 mvt type with reference to Purchase order so that your quantity, accounts will be corrected and also PO qty will be updated for correct qty.
You have no choice to avoid account document becuase you must correct your accounting else you will endup paying more to vendor for less supply or your inventory will get impacted.
The best way I can see is 102 mvt type.
Hope this helps.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

VLD-1005 Wrong Column Lengts - Pointless warning

If I have an attribute that's Number(4) and I want to use it as a source for a NUMBER column (no length or precision specified) then OWB gives me VLD-1005. Isn't this totally wrong? I can't think of a scenario where it would cause a problem. Can someone else come up with a good scenario?
Proposal for the developers: treat 0 length for number fields as NULL so conditions like 0<4 that would fire above will become NULL<4 and the users won't get a useless warning.

Hi
You can use the Preference to suppress such warnings, don't think it has the greatest name - some thing like 'Suppress Validation Warning VLD-1004' which is misleading but is related to VLD1004/1005/1006 all around data type checking.
You will find the option in OWB's preferences under the Generation/Validation section.
Cheers
David

Restricting column entries in jtable

hi i have a problem here. I am developing a Database Filter. I use JTable to accept parameters for sql functions like ltrim. rtrim, etc . Each function forms a colum header. I want to restrict entry in rtrim column if ltrim is already selected in that row. Can any one help how to go about it.

Are the numeric values really numeric values? If you put them as strings in your tablemodel, the tablesorter will sort them as strings. If you put them as numbers (Integer, Float, Double, Long), they are sorted by numerical value.

How to insert date column entry for new row from adf bc tester

Hi,
JDeveloper version 11.1.1.5.0
I have a table with a DATE column. I am trying to insert a new row into the table from the ADF BC Tester. While providing value to the DATE column I am hitting the below error:
(oracle.jbo.domain.DataCreationException) JBO-25009: Cannot create an object of type:oracle.jbo.domain.Date from type:java.lang.String with value:2011/12/06
Please let me know what should be the format to specify date value while inserting entry using BC Tester.
Thanks
Rathnam

Hi,
Check
operation not allowed on java.lang.object

Wrong oratab entry

I am on a RAC 10.2.0.4 db Standard Edition on RHEL 5.3. Two nodes. The db uses an ASM 11.1.0.7 instance and CRS 11.1.0.7.
I have launched dbca and created a database like I had done with other 3 databases before.
My /etc/oratab file does not contain the instance name but the database name. Moreover the oraenv utility does not set the environment correctly.
I think this issue might be due to the fact I had a wrong ORACLE_SID variable set when I launched dbca.
How can I fix this issue?
Thanks in advance

Hi,
it is normal that in a RAC environment only the database entry is in oratab, not the instance name. (That has nothing to do to have set ORACLE_SID before, since this should have been overwritten by DBCA when creating the database).
In my RAC environments for oraenv I always add (not change!) these entries to the oratab, to have an easy possibility to set the oraenv.
In generall oratab entries are not used actively other than in dbstart, which is not active in RAC environments anyway. So there should not be any sideeffects.
Sebastian

Wrong column entries

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for