Wrong Plant in the follow on document(PO) of SC in SRM

Hi Experts,
I need urgent input for this issue, We have SRM 7.0 and ECC 6.0 EHP5 with Classic scenario, We have created FO SC in SRM for the Plant A, After creating PO through SOCO, PO has wrong plant with the same company code, This issue is only in our production system and It is not reproducible in other systems. We have checked all possible places and configurations including org structure and custom changes. But no Clue. Plz plz plz..GIve me your valuable input on this. Awaiting your reply.
Thanks,
BR,
Basu

Hello Basu,
if the whole customizing and user settings are OK, you have to debug.
Check where PLANT value is changed: in SRM or in ECC?
Put a break-point with WF-BATCH user (must be switched to a dialog user) at create_objects( ) call in TRANSFER method from CL_BBP_SC_TRANSFER class.
Regards.
Laurent.

Similar Messages

Problem in copying the territory id to the follow-up document

Hi,
I have sales order with all the partners determined with all the territories attached to them.
Now I am trying to create a follow-up document from it. I am facing the following two issues:
1. It is copying the partners to the follow-up document with different territory ID's
2. For some partner functions, it is displaying the popup with all the territories. Eventhough this partner has one territory in preceding document.
The bottom line of the requirement is: It should copy all the partners with the same territories as in preceding document.
Could you please help me out, how can I solve this.
Thanks,
Sandeep

Hi Sandeep,
The problem could be due to the territory determination, may be the list of partner you have in your oppurtunity is determined to multiple territories, in that scenario the system will provide a option to select the territory which is more proper.
So please check the territories that are assigned to the partner or else you need to do a customisation to make sure that the required territory is copied to the follow up document. You can try enhancing the CRM_COPY_BADI.
Hope this helps you out!
Regards
Veena.

Updation of contract data for all the follow up documents

In crm I have created a service contract. From this I have created a sales-service order as follow up document. Then from this service order one suspension order.
When I am opening the sales-service order in item details tab and then in contract tab we get the contract details. When i press the follow up document button and choose the suspension order the suspension order is opening and this contract details should come here also but it is not coming. Please suggest whether this can be done by configuration or by badi. If by badi then suggest its name.

Please not that the contract determination works fine when creating a new complaint ... but when the I am trying to create a complaint from service ticket the item level contract determination is not working fine ...
We have configured that the contract should be determined at the item level only option `F`.
I checked in one of the sap document that this cant be achieved by standard .
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/en/46/5cd7335bbd516fe10000000a114a6b/frameset.htmhttp://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/en/46/5cd7335bbd516fe10000000a114a6b/frameset.htm
Is there a way we can put this code in the BADI eg; CRM_SERVICE_CONTRACT ?? Please note that there is already an implementation of CRM_SERVICE_CONTRACT which is working fine for new service document creation .

Can we creat the inforecord in ECC as the follow on document of the RFX

Hi ,experts :
As we know , we can create the contract as the follow on document of the RFX in SRM .But ,in my case ,the client do not want to use the contract .The use the inforecord in ECC .
So ,I want to know how to create the inforecord as the follow on document of RFx ?
Any suggestions ,welcome .
Bestregards !
Alex !

Hi,Masa:
Thanks for your reply .
I checked the function modle .In this FM , the system has one Remote Fuction Call ---'BBPV_CONTRACT_CREATE'(this function is on the backend system ).So ,I should change this FM use the new one ,right ?
I am sorry ,do you know the funtion name that can create the inforecord in Ecc?
many thanks !
Bestregards !
Alex !

Xchange Rate type changed in the follow on document getting posted from MM

Hi,
There is an issue while the follow on document posts from MM module to FI module.
The rate of exchange captured is M-CL while creation of the Purchase order. On posting the MIGO/ MIRO, the exchange rate type is correct viz M_CL .
But when the follow on document in the FI module is generated, the Exchange rate type is changed to M.
Can any one please tell me as to what can be the possible issue and wht are the configuration details be checked in the system or whether there is any special configuration of the Exchange rate type maintenence at country level and at transaction code level.
Thanks in Advance.
Manish

Hi Amam,
Have checked in the system the tocdes and the table as mentioned by you.
The issue here is that the system is picking the default M as the exchange rate type defined is blank . I want to specify the exchange rate type for a particular (country chile) for a particular document type.
Is there any setting to set the exchange rate ype at country / company code level for a particular document type .
Thanks in advance
Manish

ESET NOD 32 cannot scan past this point. I keep getting stuck at 56% at the following; C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\Application Data\ Mozilla\Firefox\Crash Reports\Pending. Is this a problem with NOD32 or with Firefox? Thank you.

I ran into a glitch on my system that I tried to fix myself. My NOD32 was always showing the yellow warning circle as my protection status when I started my computer. I tried to fix this every way I new how.
Then I started to get pop ups asking me to fix and then send system error reports to Windows. Some stating they were '''''critical.''''' So I sent NOD32 the e-mail below.
'''Me:''' I cannot seem to run a complete system scan. I keep getting stuck at 56% at the following point. C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\Application Data\
Mozilla\Firefox\Crash Reports\Pending
I also keep getting messages to send error reports to Microsoft constantly. I also have this code C:\pagefile.sys-error opening
Thank you for your assistance.
'''Their solution:'''
Based on the information you provided, we recommend that you upgrade to latest version of ESET NOD32 Antivirus and see if this makes a difference.
Please click or copy/paste the following ESET Knowledgebase article into your web browser for step-by-step instructions:
'''Me''' : I did as they requested and am fully upgraded and licensed with their new edition.
Ran a new scan same problem.
I sent them a new e-mail but now wonder if it is a Firefox issue as, C:\Documents and Settings\Owner\Application Data\
''Mozilla\Firefox\Crash Reports\Pending'' this is where the scan stalls.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you.

Try delete the files in Pending folder and make the scan again, do not be afraid to delete the files see : https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/679996
thank you
Please mark "Solved" the answer that really solve the problem, to help others with a similar problem.

SC not in the sourcing cockpit after the follow-on document is deleted

HI,
    In sourcing cockpit , I created a contract by SC , but I deleted the contract , the SC didn't appear in sourcing cockpit. the SOURCE_REL_IND still is 'Y',    I have no way to create new contract by the SC .
   I don't know if it is the standard functionatity, It seem to be not reasonable.
Please tell me the solution that SC can be back to sourcing cockpit automatiocally.
even if I carry out the BBP_GET_STATUS_2. it still don't work.
   Thanks a lot.
Jesse

Hi
the rule is below
sc created 2 qty -- PO created 2 qty -PO deleted - now order quantity and PO quantity difference is there so now SC comes to cockpit and this shopping cart item needs to sourced and PO needs be created.
i did not test below scenario.
SC CREATED - contract or Bid invitation created and now Contract / bid invitation deleted and now you are expecting this sc item comes to cockpit.
Note 1068497 - BBPSC04: Incorrect status for items completed in sourcing
Symptom
You create a shopping cart which is sent to sourcing cockpit. You create a follow-on document. For eg: Bid invitation. You delete the same and complete the item in sourcing. The status of the item in check status is shown as 'Approved' instead of 'Cannot be ordered'.
As per the above note sap rule, even though Bid Invitation deleted and reference shopping cart must venture to cockpit to create another follow on document.in your case SOURCE_REL_IND = Y instead of X. What is the item status of sc after contract / po deleted?

Details of Follow-up documents at Table level

Dear All,
I want to know if there is any table(s) which contains the follow-up documents numbers that gets generated in CRM.
For example,
1. first IC ticket will be generated,
2. then product complaint will be generated as a follow up transaction of IC ticket.
3. Compensation request transaction will be generated as a follow up of product complaint.
I am already able to get this follow up using BAPI but I want to know how to get this at Database level so as to make report to perform faster.
regards,
Amey Mogare

Hi Amey,
one possibility is to read doc flow using FM 'CRM_DOC_FLOW_READ_DB'.
If you really want to use the tables, here's the description:
1. Table 'SRRELROLES' with OBJKEY = GUID of order --> get the ROLE_ID
2. With ROLE_ID go to table 'CRMD_BINREL' field ROLE_A / B (depends on predecessor / successor)
3. With the other role ( ROLE_A / B) you can go back to table 'SRRELROLES' and get the GUID by the OBJKEY.
Hope, this is useful.
Best regards,
Claudia

Delete follow up document recursive

Hi folks,
I' writing a report in order to delete orders but before deleteing these orders i have to delete the follow-up documents. in some cases follow-up document also have another follow up, so before delete the first on i have to delete the last one and the the Order. i wrote loop at lt_doc_flow into ls_doc_flow.
lv_objects_to_delete = ls_doc_flow-REF_GUID.
insert ls_doc_flow-REF_GUID into table lt_objects_to_delete.
endloop.
and the call function'crm-order_delete.
in order to delte all docflow, but it doesn't work.
do u have any idea , how i can delete it recursive?
thanks .

Hello Liliane
You have to define a recursive function in order to delete your documents.
The following sample reports shows how to do that:
*& Report ZUS_SDN_RECURSIVE_CALLS
REPORT zus_sdn_recursive_calls.
TYPE-POOLS: abap.
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_s_doc.
TYPES:   guid(3)        TYPE n.
TYPES:   ref_guid(3)    TYPE n.
TYPES:   text(50)       TYPE c.
TYPES:   deleted        TYPE abap_bool.
TYPES: END OF ty_s_doc.
TYPES: ty_t_doc    TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF ty_s_doc
                   WITH DEFAULT KEY.
DATA:
gs_doc    TYPE ty_s_doc,
gt_doc    TYPE ty_t_doc.
START-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM fill_docs.
SORT gt_doc BY guid ref_guid.
WRITE: / 'Flow of Documents:'.
PERFORM write_docs.
WRITE: / 'Deleted Documents:'.
LOOP AT gt_doc INTO gs_doc
                 WHERE ( deleted = abap_false ).
    PERFORM delete_doc
                   USING gs_doc.
ENDLOOP.
write: / syst-uline.
SKIP 2.
" Reset delete flag
gs_doc-deleted = abap_false.
MODIFY gt_doc FROM gs_doc
      TRANSPORTING deleted
    WHERE ( deleted = abap_true ).
" Change sorting
SORT gt_doc BY ref_guid.
WRITE: / 'Flow of Documents:'.
PERFORM write_docs.
WRITE: / 'Deleted Documents:'.
LOOP AT gt_doc INTO gs_doc
                 WHERE ( deleted = abap_false ).
    PERFORM delete_doc
                   USING gs_doc.
ENDLOOP.
END-OF-SELECTION.
*&      Form FILL_DOCS
*       text
* --> p1        text
* <-- p2        text
FORM fill_docs .
* define local data
DATA:
    ls_doc    TYPE ty_s_doc.
" Example: Doc_001 -> referenced by Doc_011 -> referenced by Doc_101
"          Doc_002 -> Doc_012, Doc_013      -> Doc_112, Doc_113
"          Doc_003 -> not referenced
CLEAR: ls_doc.
ls_doc-guid     = '001'.
ls_doc-ref_guid = '000'. " no reference to other document
ls_doc-text     = 'Document 001'.
APPEND ls_doc TO gt_doc.
CLEAR: ls_doc.
ls_doc-guid     = '011'.
ls_doc-ref_guid = '001'.
ls_doc-text     = 'Document 011'.
APPEND ls_doc TO gt_doc.
CLEAR: ls_doc.
ls_doc-guid     = '101'.
ls_doc-ref_guid = '011'.
ls_doc-text     = 'Document 101'.
APPEND ls_doc TO gt_doc.
CLEAR: ls_doc.
ls_doc-guid     = '002'.
ls_doc-ref_guid = '000'. " no reference to other document
ls_doc-text     = 'Document 002'.
APPEND ls_doc TO gt_doc.
CLEAR: ls_doc.
ls_doc-guid     = '012'.
ls_doc-ref_guid = '002'.
ls_doc-text     = 'Document 012'.
APPEND ls_doc TO gt_doc.
CLEAR: ls_doc.
ls_doc-guid     = '013'.
ls_doc-ref_guid = '002'.
ls_doc-text     = 'Document 013'.
APPEND ls_doc TO gt_doc.
CLEAR: ls_doc.
ls_doc-guid     = '112'.
ls_doc-ref_guid = '012'.
ls_doc-text     = 'Document 112'.
APPEND ls_doc TO gt_doc.
CLEAR: ls_doc.
ls_doc-guid     = '113'.
ls_doc-ref_guid = '013'.
ls_doc-text     = 'Document 113'.
APPEND ls_doc TO gt_doc.
CLEAR: ls_doc.
ls_doc-guid     = '004'.
ls_doc-ref_guid = '000'. " no reference to other document
ls_doc-text     = 'Document 004'.
APPEND ls_doc TO gt_doc.
ENDFORM.                    " FILL_DOCS
*&      Form delete_doc
*       text
*      -->P_GS_DOC_GUID text
FORM delete_doc
            USING
               value(us_doc) TYPE ty_s_doc.
* define local data
DATA:
    ls_doc    TYPE ty_s_doc.
LOOP AT gt_doc INTO ls_doc
                 WHERE ( ref_guid = us_doc-guid )
                 AND   ( deleted = abap_false ).
    PERFORM delete_doc
                   USING ls_doc.
ENDLOOP.
IF ( syst-subrc NE 0 ).
    us_doc-deleted = abap_true.
    MODIFY gt_doc FROM us_doc
        TRANSPORTING deleted
      WHERE ( guid = us_doc-guid ).
    WRITE: / us_doc-guid, us_doc-text+0(15), us_doc-ref_guid.
ENDIF.
ENDFORM.                    " delete_doc
*&      Form WRITE_DOCS
*       text
* --> p1        text
* <-- p2        text
FORM write_docs .
* define local data
DATA:
    ls_doc    TYPE ty_s_doc.
LOOP AT gt_doc INTO ls_doc.
    WRITE: / ls_doc-guid, ls_doc-text+0(15), ls_doc-ref_guid.
ENDLOOP.
SKIP.
ENDFORM.                    " WRITE_DOCS
Regards
Uwe

Problem in changing follow up document Transaction type using CRM_COPY_BADI

Hi,
I am creating follow up document ( Service Contract ) to another service contract. Now Based on a condition, in CRM_COPY_BADI, I have to change the follow up document type forcefully to Service Contract Quotation.
Menas, eventhough I select ZSC, I have to change it to ZSCQ using CRM_COPY_BADi.
Can you please help me, how to do it.
Thanks
Sandeep

Yes, Rajesh is right. You can use action profile for that kind of stuff. For the action just use the method call COPY_DOCUMENT. And of course you then create several action which trigger this method and in action parameters define which action is triggerred when.
Regards.

When installing Itunes 10.4.1 manually I get the following error message

When installing the latest version of itunes manually since it would not automatically from the apple/itunes/download site I get the following error message
' could not access netwrok location %APPDATA%!.'

With that particular variety of 1606 (it's a 1606 error message even though the 1606 error message number isn't returned by the iTunes installer), the following Microsoft document is worth a try:
You receive an "Error 1606" error message when you try to install or remove a Microsoft program

I am trying to download latest Apple Itunes update to my Toshiba laptop and got the following system error message: APSDaemon.exe

While trying to download the latest Apple Itunes update to my Toshiba laptop I got the following
message: APSDaemon.exe system error.
I uninstalled Itunes and tried again, but got the same message.
Help, please

Go to Control Panel > Add or Remove Programs (Win XP) or Programs and Features (later)
Remove all of these items in the following order:
iTunes
Apple Software Update
Apple Mobile Device Support (if this won't uninstall move on to the next item)
Bonjour
Apple Application Support
Reboot, download iTunes, then reinstall, either using an account with administrative rights, or right-clicking the downloaded installer and selecting Run as Administrator.
The uninstall and reinstall process will preserve your iTunes library and settings, but ideally you would back up the library and your other important personal documents and data on a regular basis. See this user tip for a suggested technique.
Please note:
Some users may need to follow all the steps in whichever of the following support documents applies to their system. These include some additional manual file and folder deletions not mentioned above.
HT1925: Removing and Reinstalling iTunes for Windows XP
HT1923: Removing and reinstalling iTunes for Windows Vista, Windows 7, or Windows 8
tt2

Trying to install itunes on windows vista and get the following error message:

Trying to install itunes on windows vista and get the following error message: An error occurred during the installation of assembly "Microsoft.VC80.CRT,version="8.0.50727.4053",type="win32",publicKey Token="1fc8b3b9a1e3b",process orArchitecture="x86"". Please refer to Help and Support for more information. HRESULT: 0x80070424.

A broken Windows Modules Installer then. It's a bit of an involved fix getting past it, but we've had success here with it in the past.
First, I'd strongly suggest setting up a system restore point.
Now try the Scenario III treatment from the following document:
Windows Update Error 80070424 in Vista
Head back into Windows Update and attempt to get updates again. If they still fail, this time with an 8000FFFF error code, try the following Microsoft document:
Windows Update error 8000FFFF
If you get Windows Updates flowing again, stock up on any you're behind on (restarting the PC when requested to do so). This may take some time and may have to be done in several batches, depending on how far you've fallen behind. Basically, keep going back to Windows Update until it stops offering you new updates.
After the updates have been installed, restart the PC one more time (in order to ensure that any pending installs requiring a restart have been resolved).
Now try another iTunes install. Does it go through without the 0x80070424 this time?

Follow-on documents are not visible in MIRO in TEST server, awsys = PRD300.

Dear Experts ,
The Test Server was refreshed around mid-June 2011 with data of
Production Server. The follow-on documents are not visible for the
invoice documents in MIRO in TEST server due to value in tables
BKPF,RBKP : field : AWSYS = PRD300 .
The newly created Purchase Orders after the refresh, the accounting
documents can be seen for the Goods Receipt (MIGO_GR-display) and
Invoice documents (MIRO).
we had already raised this issue in March & got the feedback from SAP
as shown below.
accordingly we have developed & run the program "zzlogsys2" which
updates the Logsys/Awsys field from PRD300 ( of production server ) to
that of the current server i.e. TST300 as required.
after which the FI documents for the material documents are visible in
MIGO,but follow-on documents are not visible for the invoice documents
in MIRO.
we have Checked notes 781498 and 28958 to see if the logical system is
correctly assigned , where we found that in table RBKP after entering document number, Fiscal Year , the
Field AWSYS is "PRD300" & not "TST300" as it should be. We will take up the activity of updating table RBKP
also as we are currently doing for tables MKPF & BKPF.
But to have clear picture as to what we are doing is correct , pl
advise about the following :
1) Is it a correct process done by our SAP-Basis team , that every time
any Server ( e.g. Test or Quality ) is refreshed with Production server
data, the Field AWSYS in various transaction tables gets value as
"PRD300" which then is required to replaced by running program such as
ZZlogsys.
REPORT ZZLOGSYS.
TABLES: T000, MKPF.
DATA: NEW_SYS LIKE MKPF-AWSYS.
PARAMETER: OLD_SYS LIKE MKPF-AWSYS.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM T000 WHERE MANDT EQ SY-MANDT.
NEW_SYS = T000-LOGSYS.
CHECK NOT NEW_SYS IS INITIAL.
UPDATE MKPF SET AWSYS = NEW_SYS
WHERE AWSYS = OLD_SYS.
WRITE:/ 'Number of updates: ', SY-DBCNT.
2) if the above process is correct & normal , then which are the other
tables in a particular server ,apart from tables MKPF,BKPF,RBKP , which
needs to be updated the value of field "AWSYS" in the same way
replacing value "PRD300".
3) if the process in point no. 1 is not correct , then what is the
correct process that the Basis team can do while refreshing any target
server with production data so that target server retains its value in
Field AWSYS & not showing "PRD300".
With 3 servers TEST,DEV & Quality , recently refreshed with production
server to bring all servers in Sync for a HR patch application, we have
this situation now in all 3 servers .
Thanks in advance ,
Anil Shanbhag

It is appropriate to move this thread from ERP-MM to [Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)|Enterprise Resource Planning (SAP ERP);
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Jul 7, 2011 4:56 PM

Limitation on po line items and follow on documents

Hi All,
Greetings..
Can any one let me know what is the cap limit for line items for an srm PO and even on the follow on documents.
Currently wer arein 4.0 and are facing problems with these issues upgrade is planned next month.
will this be an issue in SRM 7.0 also
Regards
Gopi

Hi
I dont think there is any cap limit for line items of a Purchase order in SRM. It must be something specific to your landscape. In that case , check what is developed to put a check on limit field in SRM 4.0.
You will then need to evaluate if that developmnet is impacted in SRM 7.0 or not
Regards
Virender Singh

Wrong Plant in the follow on document(PO) of SC in SRM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for