Limitation on po line items and follow on documents
Hi All,
Greetings..
Can any one let me know what is the cap limit for line items for an srm PO and even on the follow on documents.
Currently wer arein 4.0 and are facing problems with these issues upgrade is planned next month.
will this be an issue in SRM 7.0 also
Regards
Gopi
Hi
I dont think there is any cap limit for line items of a Purchase order in SRM. It must be something specific to your landscape. In that case , check what is developed to put a check on limit field in SRM 4.0.
You will then need to evaluate if that developmnet is impacted in SRM 7.0 or not
Regards
Virender Singh
Similar Messages
-
Multiple Service Entry Sheet For PO Line Items and One GR Document
Dear All,
We have just migrated from ECC 5.0 System to ECC 6.0 System. We are facing a problem while processing service entry sheets and the GR against them. The scenario is:
1. We create a maintenance plan
2. Upon saving the Maintenance Plan, a Purchase Requisition (PR) is generated
3. The PR's are combined into one Purchase Order
4. Against the Purchase Orders, multiple service entry sheets are created
In ECC 5.0 System, we used to accept the service entry sheets and only one material document used to get generated as GR document. But now in ECC 6.0, we observe that with the same configuration, individual material documents are getting generated for individual service entry sheets. Is there a configuration in ECC 5.0, that enables clubbing of service entry sheet items in one GR document?
Your help will be sincerely appreciated.
Thanks and Sincere Regards,
AmitabhaHi,
If this can be of help I can report the list of the programs that
are executed:
Before the popup "FUNCTION POPUP_TO_CONFIRM_STEP" appeares in ML81N,
following programs are executed:
5 FUNCTION POPUP_TO_CONFIRM_STEP SAPLSPO1
4 FORM SELECTION_CHANGED_PO SAPLMLSR
3 FORM FCODE_SEL_PO SAPLMLSR
2 FORM FCODE SAPLMLSR
1 MODULE (PAI) FCODE SAPLMLSR
Unfortunately at this time it is not planned to change the current
functionality.
Regards,
Edit -
Error while editing PO - deleting service line item and creating material line item.
In SAP SRM Extended classic scenario, PO is in 'ordered' status and contains a service line item. While editing this PO, I delete the service line item and create a new material line item. This gives me the following error.
Back end error: Enter G/L account
Back end error: LIne item still contains faulty items.
This happens only with service- material comibination and no other combination(material-service, service-service, material-material).
I need to know the reason for this issue and how it can be solved?PO Values (Inc Tax):
Item 1: INR 228 L
Item 2: INR 27.83 L (Payment also done in 2008)
GR for Item 1: INR 207.46 L
Remaining Comm = INR 21.01 L
Item 1 having 73 sub line items.... fo some of the sub-line items GR for some qty already done in last fiscals.
User changing for remaining qty.
Budget Report values:
Previous Years: Budget, Actual & Assigned = 304.85 L
Available = 0 (Carry Forward done for Budget & Commitments)
2011: Budget = 75.15 L
Actual = 53.86 L
Comm = 21.01 L (Same as Remaining Commitment)
Avai = 0.28 L
Hope this will help. -
In a archived saler Order user had deleted Line Item and completed overall sales order. Now this sales order is archived, but it is stll appearing in BW report as open order because of deleted item with rejection Status is maintained as “A” (Not yet Processed).
We want to change this status from "A" (Not yet Processed) to "C" as completed.
I have tried to reload Archive data but due to some limitation I was not able to do it. Also I feel this will like this s not the proper way to do it.
Could you please help me to correct way to do it???
Thanks in advance....Hi Vaibhav,
If you can get the list of Sales orders which has deleted line items and force completion status. You can manage them in BI via lookup or navigation attribute.
Just my views I am sharing .
Thanks,
KDJ -
Line Item and Transaction Figures
Hi experts,
What is the difference between line items and transaction figures ?
I have gone through a document which specifies for Line items GL AR AP, it picks data respectively frm tables BSEG/BKPF, BSAD/BSID, BSAK/BSIK and for transaction figures GLT0/GLFUNCT, KNC1/KNC3, LFC1/LFC3.
What data 0FI_XX_6 fetches into BI when compared with 0FI_XX_4 ?
Please clarify.
Regards,
Bhadri M.Hi,
What are Transaction Figures :
Transaction figures are the sums of line items on the debit or credit side. The balance is the
difference between the debit and the credit transaction figure.
What is line items :
Line items are document items that were posted to a specific account. In contrast to a document item a line item only contains the information from the document that is relevant from the account view.
You can display the following line items:
Open items Cleared items Noted items Parked items Items with special G/L transactions (in Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable)
Items with customer or vendor items (in Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable)
You can display the line items for the following account types:
Customer accounts
Vendor accounts
G/L accounts
Point No 1:
0FI_XX_6 : Transaction Figures:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/41/4b73415fb9157de10000000a155106/content.htm
0FI_XX_4: Line-Item
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw33/helpdata/en/af/16533bbb15b762e10000000a114084/content.htm
Regards
Ram.
Edited by: Ramakanth Deepak Gandepalli on Dec 22, 2009 10:46 AM -
Buyer change the PO line items and end up with Awaiting Approval status.
Can you please help to look into this issue.
1.Buyer change the PO line items and end up with Awaiting Approval status.
2. But user claim that she got enough limit and should not route to her manager's approval. Also check with her manager and this PO do not exist his queue.
Any clue or tips on how to investigate on this issue. All your tips are appreciated,
-RickYou cannot change these POs because their changed version has status
'Deleted'. My proposal to fix them will be the following:
You will have to set changed version as closed(DOC_CLOSED set to X)
and in active version set DOC_CLOSED to space.
__-For the above statement, Can you guys please let me know, which table DOC_CLOSED belongs to and what are the steps to do this, as i come from a functional back ground.__ -
Header, Line Item and Cache Techniques Using Hashed Tables
Hi,
How can I work with header, line item, and a cache techniques using hashed tables?
Thanks,
Shah.Hi,
Here is an example to clarify the ideas:
In general, every time you have a header-> lines structure you have a unique key for the lines that has at least header key plus one or more fields. I'll make use of this fact.
I'll try to put an example of how to work with header -> line items and a cache technique using hashed tables.
Just suppose that you need a list of all the material movements '101'-'901' for a certain range of dates in mkpf-budat. We'll extract these fields:
mkpf-budat
mkpf-mblnr,
mseg-lifnr,
lfa1-name1,
mkpf-xblnr,
mseg-zeile
mseg-charg,
mseg-matnr,
makt-maktx,
mseg-erfmg,
mseg-erfme.
I'll use two cache: one for maintaining lfa1 related data and the other to maintain makt related data. Also I'll only describe the data gathering part. The showing of the data is left to your own imagination.
The main ideas are:
1. As this is an example I won't use inner join. If properly desingned may be faster .
2. I'll use four hashed tables: ht_mkpf, ht_mseg, ht_lfa1 and ht_makt to get data into memory. Then I'll collect all the data I want to list into a fifth table ht_lst.
3. ht_mkpf should have (at least) mkpf's primary key fields : mjahr, mblnr.
4. ht_mseg should have (at least) mseg primary key fields: mjahr mblnr and zeile.
5. ht_lfa1 should have an unique key by lifnr.
6. ht_makt should have an unique key by matnr.
7. I prefer using with header line because makes the code easier to follow and understand. The waste of time isn't quite significant (in my experience at least).
Note: When I've needed to work from header to item lines then I added a counter in ht_header that maintains the count of item lines, and I added an id in the ht_lines so I can read straight by key a given item line. But this is very tricky to implement and to follow. (Nevertheless I've programmed it and it works well.)
The data will be read in this sequence:
select data from mkpf into table ht_mkpf
select data from mseg int table ht_mseg having in count all the data in ht_mkpf
loop at ht_mseg (lines)
filter unwanted records
read cache for lfa1 and makt
fill in ht_lst and collect data
endloop.
tables
tables: mkpf, mseg, lfa1, makt.
internal tables:
data: begin of wa_mkpf, "header
mblnr like mkpf-mblnr,
mjahr like mkpf-mjahr,
budat like mkpf-budat,
xblnr like mkpf-xblnr,
end of wa_mkpf.
data ht_mkpf like hashed table of wa_mkpf
with unique key mblnr mjahr
with header line.
data: begin of wa_mseg, " line items
mblnr like mseg-mblnr,
mjahr like mseg-mjahr,
zeile like mseg-zeile,
bwart like mseg-bwart,
charg like mseg-charg,
matnr like mseg-matnr,
lifnr like mseg-lifnr,
erfmg like mseg-erfmg,
erfme like mseg-erfme,
end of wa_mseg,
data ht_mseg like hashed table of wa_mseg
with unique key mblnr mjahr zeile
with header line.
data: begin of wa_lfa1,
lifnr like lfa1-lifnr,
name1 like lfa1-name1,
end of wa_lfa1,
data ht_lfa1 like hashed table of wa_lfa1
with unique key lifnr
with header line.
data: begin of wa_makt,
matnr like makt-matnr,
maktx like makt-maktx,
end of wa_makt.
data: ht_makt like hashed table of wa_makt
with unique key matnr
with header line.
result table
data: begin of wa_lst, "
budat like mkpf-budat,
mblnr like mseg-mblnr,
lifnr like mseg-lifnr,
name1 like lfa1-name1,
xblnr like mkpf-xblnr,
zeile like mseg-zeile,
charg like mseg-charg,
matnr like mseg-matnr,
maktx like makt-maktx,
erfmg like mseg-erfmg,
erfme like mseg-erfme,
mjahr like mseg-mjahr,
end of wa_mseg,
data: ht_lst like hashed table of wa_lst
with unique key mblnr mjahr zeile
with header line.
data: g_lines type i.
select-options: so_budat for mkpf-budat default sy-datum.
select-options: so_matnr for mseg-matnr.
form get_data.
select mblnr mjahr budat xblnr
into table ht_mkfp
from mkpf
where budat in so_budat.
describe table ht_mkpf lines g_lines.
if lines > 0.
select mblnr mjahr zeile bwart charg
matnr lifnr erfmg erfme
into table ht_mseg
from mseg
for all entries in ht_mkpf
where mblnr = ht_mkpf-mblnr
and mjahr = ht_mjahr.
endif.
loop at ht_mseg.
filter unwanted data
check ht_mseg-bwart = '101' or ht_mseg-bwart = '901'.
check ht_mseg-matnr in so_matnr.
read header line.
read table ht_mkpf with table key mblnr = ht_mseg-mblnr
mjahr = ht_mseg-mjahr.
clear ht_lst.
note : this may be faster if you specify field by field.
move-corresponding ht_mkpf to ht_lst.
move-corresponding ht_mseg to ht_lst.
perform read_lfa1 using ht_mseg-lifnr changing ht_lst-name1.
perform read_makt using ht_mseg-matnr changing ht_lst-maktx.
insert table ht_lst.
endloop.
implementation of cache for lfa1.
form read_lfa1 using p_lifnr changing p_name1.
read table ht_lfa1 with table key lifnr = p_lifnr
transporting name1.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
clear ht_lfa1.
ht_lfa1-lifnr = p_lifnr.
select single name1
into ht_lfa1-name1
from lfa1
where lifnr = p_lifnr.
if sy-subrc <> 0. ht_lfa1-name1 = 'n/a in lfa1'. endif.
insert table ht_lfa1.
endif.
p_name1 = ht_lfa1-name1.
endform.
implementation of cache for makt
form read_makt using p_matnr changing p_maktx.
read table ht_makt with table key matnr = p_matnr
transporting maktx.
if sy-subrc <> 0.
ht_makt-matnr = p_matnr.
select single maktx into ht_matk-maktx
from makt
where spras = sy-langu
and matnr = p_matnr.
if sy-subrc <> 0. ht_makt-maktx = 'n/a in makt'. endif.
insert table ht_makt.
endif.
p_maktx = ht_makt-maktx.
endform.
Reward points if found helpfull...
Cheers,
Siva. -
FBCJ LINE ITEM AND FI LINE ITEMS ARE DIFFERENT
Dear Expert
FBCJ LINE ITEM AND FI LINE ITEMS ARE DIFFERENTHi,
It seems from the screen shot you are seeing different documents as in the first screen shot it clearly shows you have booked the multiple expenses under one see the below screen shot we have circled it
whereas FB03 screen shows different.
You can do one thing click on circle item and check the expenses involved in it and accordingly go to FBL3N and display documents for that G/L for the date 05.04.2014.
Hope your issue has been resolved else revert.
Regards,
Tejas. -
Missing Line Items and '?' Symbols in some Reports
I have upgraded the patch level of my production server and patch level
list is given below
SAP_BASIS 640 0022 SAPKB64022
SAP_ABA 640 0022 SAPKA64022
ST-PI 003C_640 0001 SAPKITLPS1
PI_BASIS 2006_1_6400006 SAPKIPYL06
SAP_BW 350 0021 SAPKW35021
SAP_HR 500 0017 SAPKE50017
SAP_APPL 500 0019 SAPKH50019
PI 2004_1_5000004 SAPKIPZI64
problem is that whenever I run SAP FICO standard reports FL3N, FBL5N,
KB01, F.08 etc it generates the report correctly but when i am taking
print out of these reports it misses some line items and total value as
well screen shots are attached for information.
my second problem is that there are some garbage entries with
symbol '?' in SAP Menu and toolbars of some Reports. Screen shot is
also attached for your information.
i am facing lots of problem in executing my daily operations due to
these errors.
regards,
Majid KhanDear Subramanian,
I am facing the same problem in Development and Quality Assurance Server
Regards,
Majid Khan -
Current;y have to expand each major line item and check all the minor line items, I just want a list of SNs associated with the contract. Any way to get this mailed to me every month?
Hi
I am sorry to see you are having problems
I suggest you contact the forum mods they should be able to get this problem sorted for you this is a link to them http://bt.custhelp.com/app/contact_email/c/4951
They normally reply by email or phone directly to you within 3 working days they will take personal ownership of your problem until resolved and will keep you informed of progress
They are a UK based BT specialist team who have a good record at getting problems solved
This is a customer to customer self help forum the only BT presence here are the forum moderators
If you want to say thanks for a helpful answer,please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the reply answers your question then please mark as ’Mark as Accepted Solution’ -
STO or PO for multiple line items and multiple destinations
I am working in retail enviornment and I have folloowing two questions:
1- we need to push articles( materials) to approx 1400store- we need to create STO with approx 10 line items and send materails to 1400 stores- this happens several times a year.
what is the easiest way to create this document without having to create either 1400 documents or create one document for all stores and enter 14000 lines? (Sames items/ and qty going to all stores)
2- We also have to send approx 600 items to one or two stores at a time ( when a new store is opened)- these items are same.
Is there a way to create this STO/ PO and keep reusing this document again and again withoiut entering 600 line items everytime this requirement comes up ( this requirements comes up anywhere from 10 times per year to 50 times/yr
Does anyone have any idea on how to simplyfy this process. Any help/ idea would be of great help.
Thanks
RajA PO once entered can be copied in ME21N, by drag-n-drop into the shopping cart. The problem might be changing delivery dates and delivery plants.
Another option is to use BOMs. -
Relation between Invoice Line items and Accounting Line item
Dear All,
My requirement is to print all the invoice documents and it's tax values like cenvat, Ecess, BED and VAT.
I have to fetch these tax details from BSEG table .
I' am getting Invoice number ( RBKP-BELNR ) from BKPF-AWTKEY .
Can any one please tell me how to relate the Invoice line items and Accounting document line items..
Any BAPI or FM is there to retrieve these data.
Please do needful in this regard.Hi,
from table bseg - field Koart
K = Vendor
D = Customer
S = G/L account here tax lines identify with buzid = T
or take table bset for taxes
Andreas -
To get line item and confirmation details from CRM_ORDER_READ
Hi,
Please can anybody let me know which the field from which i can get line item details and material for the service order given?
I am using CRM_ORDER_READ to retrieve the values. In that i am exporting 4 fields - et_orderadm_h, et_orderadm_i, et_product_i, et_doc_flow. So from where to get line items and material id from these fields?
I will be very thankful if i get the answer of this question.Hi,
The attribute NUMBER_INT of ET_ORDERADM_I contains the Item Number.
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Rohit -
Table to link FI document number, line item and pricing condition type
Hi,
I am looking for tables to link the FI document number, line item and PO pricing condition type.
Appreciate any help on this.
Thanks.For any PO in ME23n in which Goods receipt has happened, you can check in the itemdetails->Po history tab in ME23n.
Here you will find the material document number. Just click on the material document, it will take you to anpther screen here you will find a button for FI document.
Click that button for FI document. In PO history istelf you can see the Condition types.
Hope this helps. -
Line item and summary settlement in AUC
Hi
What is the difference between line item and summary settlement with reagrds to AUC,In what cases they are going to be used ,can any one provide me some examples.
Thanks
LilyHi,
In WBS, there would be n number of line items in the Investment Projects.
So while doing settlement for those, we can decide whether to do on WBS based or Line items based.
These settings will be done by CO people.
Regards,
Maheswaran.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to install Flash Player onto E51?
I really want to watch videos from my phone but unfortunately, only after I bought the phone did I realise that the latest Flash Player is not installed in this model. As such, most websites that I can normally watch videos from do not work (except f
-
Hyperlink style changes after launching site
I've assigned a hyperlink style to some text and it works fine when I'm publishing my temp site. Once I "launch" the site, the link stye changes to default (blue text and underline). How do I get my Launched site to adhere to the specified link style
-
Issue with the recent MAC OSX 10.7.5 update
The recent MAC OSX 10.7.5 update rendered my WD external backup disk unusable. The iMAC only recognizes it as read-only now despite having 2 TB of available space. It doesn't even show on my desktop anymore. I have tried disk repair but it couldn't
-
Using Windows 7. 64 bit
-
No surround sound on DTT2500 with X-FI music card
Hi, I have new x-fi music soundcard and my old Cambridge Soundworks DTT2500 System. When I set the speakermode of the x-fi to 5.1 speakers it doesn't work correctly. The speaker test for the rear speakers is only audible on the left and right speaker