Wrong SOAP port?

Hi everyone,
I'm trying to call a web service, which I've previously designed. As the location of the webservice I used the format:
http://host:port/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?channel=party:service:channel
I didn't know the port, so I left it out, hoping it would be ok. I used a configuration like this instead:
http://host/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?channel=party:service:channel
When I now call the SOAP request with XML Spy using the generated WSDL, I get the following error message:
HTTP error: could not POST file
'location' on server 'host' (500)
So it's a 500 error I'm getting, and I wonder if this is because I haven't specified a port. If so, how can I find out, what port to use for a SOAP request? Is there a standard port?
Thank you,
Alex

Hi,
You have to Use the XI'sServer Port which starts with 5xx00... where xx is the instance no
Check thsi for better clarity
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/ae/d03341771b4c0de10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Also Look at this Blog which deals with Direct posting to IS
Using the SOAP inbound channel of the Integration Engine
REgards
Seshagiri
Edited by: N V Seshagiri on Aug 13, 2008 9:09 AM

Similar Messages

Error Calling Web Service - VersionMismatch Wrong SOAP Version

Hello,
I am attempting to create a web service from a function module, and to call this web service from outside of SAP.
I used the Web Service Creation Wizard to create a web service from BAPI_CURRENCY_GETLIST, and tested it using the Web Service Homepage button from transaction WSADMIN. Everything seems to work OK so far.
To test calling the web service, I copied the SOAP envelope from the web service homepage into a vbscript file:
Const HOST = "http://<server>.<domain>:<port>"
Const URL = "/sap/bc/srt/rfc/sap/ZWSD_Currency?sap-client=<nnn>"
' Create the HTTP object
Set xmlhttp = CreateObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP")
Dim Request
Request = "<?xml version=""1.0"" encoding=""UTF-8"" ?>" & _
          "<SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV=""http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope"" xmlns:xsi=""http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"" xmlns:xs=""http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"">" & _
          "<SOAP-ENV:Header>" & _
          "<sapsess:Session xmlns:sapsess=""http://www.sap.com/webas/630/soap/features/session/"">" & _
          "<enableSession>true</enableSession>" & _
          "</sapsess:Session>" & _
          "</SOAP-ENV:Header>" & _
          "<SOAP-ENV:Body>" & _
          "<ns1:CurrencyGetlist xmnls:ns1='urn:sap-com:document:sap:soap:functions:mc-style'>" & _
          "<CurrencyList><item>" & _
          "<CURRENCY></CURRENCY>" & _
          "<CURRENCY_ISO></CURRENCY_ISO>" & _
          "<ALT_CURR></ALT_CURR>" & _
          "<VALID_TO></VALID_TO>" & _
          "<LONG_TEXT></LONG_TEXT>" & _
          "</item></CurrencyList>" & _
          "</ns1:CurrencyGetlist>" & _
          "</SOAP-ENV:Body>" & _
          "</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>"
xmlhttp.open "POST", HOST & URL, False
xmlhttp.send (request)
MsgBox (xmlhttp.responseXML.xml)
When I execute the vbscript, the response is
<soap-env:Envelope xmlns:soap-env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelop/">
<soap-env:Body>
<soap-env:Fault>
    <faultcode>
      soap-env:VersionMismatch
    </faultcode>
    <faultstring xml:lang="en">
      Wrong SOAP Version
    </faultstring>
</soap-env:Fault>
</soap-env:Body>
</soap-env:Envelope>
The system log (transaction SM21) contains the messages:
SOAP Runtime: SOAP Fault exception occurred in program CL_SOAP_MESSAGE===============CP in include CL_SOAP_ME SSAGE===============CM00X at position 34
SOAP Runtime: Exception message: Severe processing error; SOAP fault handling required
In the RFC trace (transaction SM59) I see
XRFC> INFO 14:25:10: SOAP Transport Binding CL_SOAP_TRANSPORT_BINDING     <
XRFC> ROOT->IFSOAP_TRANSPORT_BINDING~RESPONSE() Try to create response <
XRFC> message                                                             <
XRFC>                                                                     <
XRFC> INFO 14:25:10: SOAP Transport Binding CL_SOAP_TRANSPORT_BINDING     <
XRFC> ROOT->IFSOAP_TRANSPORT_BINDING~RESPONSE() Response message        <
XRFC> created                                                             <
XRFC>                                                                     <
XRFC> INFO 14:25:10: SOAP Transport binding CL_SOAP_HTTP_TPBND_ROOT       <
XRFC> ->IF_SOAP_TRANSPORT_BINDING~RECEIVE() Try to receive message        <
XRFC>                                                                     <
XRFC> 20071218 142510 00037640: SOAP Fault Exception caught: : Wrong      <
XRFC> SOAP Version                                                        <
XRFC>                                                                     <
XRFC>
XRFC> End of user trace
How can I tell what version(s) of SOAP the NetWeaver 2004 platform supports? Has anyone seen and resolved this error?
Thanks in advance,
Mark

Hi Anton,
Thanks for the helpful suggestion. I did try setting SOAPAction using xmlhttp.setRequestHeader, but that didn't seem to make any difference. I may not have formatted the SOAP header correctly, however.
What I noticed is that if I added a slash at the end of the xmlns:soap tag in the SOAP envelope, I got a different error message (SOAP Processing failure, error id = 112).
I downloaded version 2.0 of the .NET framework and the SOAPSonar tool. SOAPSonar was able to format the SOAP envelope from the WSDL. When I pasted the SOAP envelope from SOAPSonar into my vbscript file, it worked. So, the vbscript looks like this:
Const HOST = "http://nwr051.nwenergy:1080"
Const URL = "/sap/bc/srt/rfc/sap/ZWSD_Currency?sap-client=100"
Const FORMAT = "dd-MMM-yy"
' Create the HTTP object
Set xmlhttp = CreateObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP")
Dim Request
Request = "<?xml version=""1.0"" encoding=""utf-8""?>" & _
          "<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap=""http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"" xmlns:xsi=""http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"" xmlns:xsd=""http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"" xmlns:tns=""urn:sap-com:document:sap:soap:functions:mc-style"">" & _
          " <soap:Body>" & _
          "    <tns:CurrencyGetlist>" & _
          "      <CurrencyList>" & _
          "      </CurrencyList>" & _
          "    </tns:CurrencyGetlist>" & _
          " </soap:Body>" & _
          "</soap:Envelope>"
xmlhttp.open "POST", HOST & URL, False
xmlhttp.send (request)
MsgBox (xmlhttp.responseXML.xml)
Again, thanks for taking the time to read through this and offer your insight.
Regards,
Mark

No supported SOAP Port found to test. Please validate WSDL

Hi I deployed a BPEL process.
When I click Initiate link to test it .
it shows above error ' No supported SOAP Port found to test. Please validate WSDL'
Where I am doing wrong ?
Thanks
Praveen

Hi This is my WSDL from BPEL console
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <definitions name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImpl" targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/ABCSImpl/EBIZ/Core/SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImpl/V1" xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" xmlns:tns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/ABCSImpl/EBIZ/Core/SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImpl/V1" xmlns:itemabcs="http://xmlns.oracle.com/ABCSImpl/EBIZ/Core/SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImpl/V1" xmlns:itemebo="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EnterpriseObjects/Core/EBO/Item/V1" xmlns:svcdoc="http://xmlns.oracle.com/Services/Documentation/V1" xmlns:plnk="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/05/partner-link/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:itemsvc="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EnterpriseServices/Core/Item/V1" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:client="http://xmlns.oracle.com/ABCSImpl/EBIZ/Core/SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImpl/V1" xmlns:itemabo="http://www.example.org/SyncItemPublicationInput">
<import namespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EnterpriseServices/Core/Item/V1" location="http://ap6032fems.us.oracle.com:7831/AIAComponents/EnterpriseBusinessServiceLibrary/Core/Item/ItemEBS.wsdl" />
- <types>
- <xsd:schema targetNamespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/ABCSImpl/EBIZ/Core/SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImpl/V1" elementFormDefault="qualified" xmlns:itemabcs="http://xmlns.oracle.com/ABCSImpl/EBIZ/Core/Item/V1" xmlns:itemebo="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EnterpriseObjects/Core/EBO/Item/V1" xmlns:plnk="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2003/05/partner-link/" xmlns:svcdoc="http://xmlns.oracle.com/Services/Documentation/V1" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:client="http://xmlns.oracle.com/SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImpl" xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" xmlns:itemabo="http://www.example.org/SyncItemPublicationInput">
<xsd:import namespace="http://xmlns.oracle.com/EnterpriseObjects/Core/EBO/Item/V1" schemaLocation="http://ap6032fems.us.oracle.com:7831/AIAComponents/EnterpriseObjectLibrary/Release1/Core/EBO/Item/ItemEBM.xsd" />
<xsd:import namespace="http://www.example.org/SyncItemPublicationInput" schemaLocation="http://ap6032fems.us.oracle.com:7831/AIAComponents/ApplicationObjectLibrary/EBiz/ApplicationInterfaces/Item/Schemas/ItemABM.xsd" />
</xsd:schema>
</types>
- <message name="SyncItemResponseMessage">
<part name="SyncItemPublicationConfirmation" element="itemebo:SyncItemPublicationConfirmationEBM" />
</message>
- <message name="SyncItemRequestMessage">
<part name="SyncItemPublication" element="itemebo:SyncItemPublicationEBM" />
</message>
- <message name="SyncItemABMRequestMessage">
<part name="Item" element="itemabo:item" />
</message>
- <message name="SyncItemABMResponseMessage">
<part name="ItemStatus" element="itemabo:itemStatus" />
</message>
- <portType name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplCallback">
- <operation name="onResult">
<input message="tns:SyncItemResponseMessage" />
</operation>
</portType>
- <portType name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImpl">
- <operation name="initiate">
<input message="tns:SyncItemRequestMessage" />
<output message="tns:SyncItemResponseMessage" />
</operation>
</portType>
- <binding name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplCallbackBinding" type="tns:SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplCallback">
<soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" />
- <operation name="onResult">
<soap:operation style="document" soapAction="onResult" />
- <input>
<soap:header message="tns:WSARelatesToHeader" part="RelatesTo" use="literal" encodingStyle="" />
<soap:body use="literal" />
</input>
</operation>
</binding>
- <binding name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplBinding" type="tns:SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImpl">
<soap:binding style="document" transport="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http" />
- <operation name="initiate">
<soap:operation style="document" soapAction="initiate" />
- <input>
<soap:header message="tns:WSARelatesToHeader" part="RelatesTo" use="literal" encodingStyle="" />
<soap:body use="literal" />
</input>
- <output>
<soap:body use="literal" />
</output>
</operation>
</binding>
- <service name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplCallbackService">
- <port name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplCallbackPort" binding="tns:SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplCallbackBinding">
<soap:address location="http://set.by.caller" />
</port>
</service>
- <service name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplService">
- <port name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplPort" binding="tns:SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplBinding">
<soap:address location="http://set.by.caller" />
</port>
</service>
- <plnk:partnerLinkType name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImpl">
- <plnk:role name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplProvider">
<plnk:portType name="tns:SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImpl" />
</plnk:role>
- <plnk:role name="SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplRequester">
<plnk:portType name="tns:SyncItemEBIZProvBPELABCSImplCallback" />
</plnk:role>
</plnk:partnerLinkType>
- <plnk:partnerLinkType name="ItemEBS_PL">
- <plnk:role name="ItemEBS_Role">
<plnk:portType name="itemsvc:ItemEBS" />
</plnk:role>
</plnk:partnerLinkType>
</definitions>

SOAP ports with cluster setup and BES?

Okay, our cluster setup in NetWare (yes, still NetWare cluster) with Groupwise 7.0.3 we have unique TCP ports for the client/server (like 1677-something). Even though each clustered node has a unique IP and is running in protected memory.
That being said:
We'd like to enable SOAP for use with BES and GWArchive.
The issue/question:
Do either of these figure out the SOAP port for each PO? Or must the SOAP port be the same among all the PO's for BES to work properly?
If the SOAP port must be the same (I'm not the BES admin, so I don't know if the setup lets you specify just one port or if you can defined them per PO), can you run multiple POA on the same physical host (keep in mind, this is clustered with protected memory) and use the same TCP port # for SOAP?

kjhurni wrote:
> Okay, our cluster setup in NetWare (yes, still NetWare cluster) with
> Groupwise 7.0.3 we have unique TCP ports for the client/server (like
> 1677-something). Even though each clustered node has a unique IP and is
> running in protected memory.
>
> That being said:
>
> We'd like to enable SOAP for use with BES and GWArchive.
>
> The issue/question:
>
> Do either of these figure out the SOAP port for each PO? Or must the
> SOAP port be the same among all the PO's for BES to work properly?
>
> If the SOAP port must be the same (I'm not the BES admin, so I don't
> know if the setup lets you specify just one port or if you can defined
> them per PO), can you run multiple POA on the same physical host (keep
> in mind, this is clustered with protected memory) and use the same TCP
> port # for SOAP?
>
>
I haven't used BES, but in general there's no auto-discover method for
SOAP ports, so yes they'd probably have to be the same port.

Groupwise Mobile Issue - multiple SOAP Ports

Hi All,
I'm having an issue with Groupwise Mobile.
I've got multiple POAs hosted on the same server (using different ports), and GMS can only access one of them. The one that it can access is using the standard 7191 SOAP port.
Is there a trick to get mail to pass across another port? Users can authenticate, but synchronization doesn't work.
Thanks,
Matt

Originally Posted by mikebell90
There used to be a known issue with soap that if you had multiple poas
on the same ip, you could only access one
It seems to be working now. But I'm not sure how I fixed it.
To complicate things, I think I was suffering from two separate issues that presented themselves as one problem.
One of the changes I made was to install GWM as a trusted app, rather than using user based authentication. This seemed to help GWM access POAs with SOAP ports other than 7191.
The other "issue" I had seemed to "heal" itself. The user account I was using to troubleshoot this showed up with the following message in it's inbox:
Syncing resumed - password resupplied
Your password was resupplied, and Intellisync Mobile Suite is now syncing normally again
...so I'm assuming that GWM was caching bad authentication data. I just couldn't seem to get this data to flush out, even after deleting and re-adding the user in GWM, cycling services, and rebooting servers.

Soap port already in use (856B) GW 703

Anyone run into this problem where if you have multiple POA's on single server and if you enable SOAP to use default port of 7191 on both POA's, one or other POA complains about "soap port already in use (856B)" and shuts down that POA.
BES doesn't seem to have option for add'l port number assignments? Or is there a workaround to allow both POA's to listen on same port number?
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Thanks

On Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:36:02 +0000, josejimenez wrote:
> Anyone run into this problem where if you have multiple POA's on single
> server and if you enable SOAP to use default port of 7191 on both POA's,
> one or other POA complains about "soap port already in use (856B)" and
> shuts down that POA.
Makes sense. You can't run multiple services on the same server using
the same IP address and port.
> Or
> is there a workaround to allow both POA's to listen on same port number?
Use multiple IP addresses and bind each POA to a specific IP.
Joe Marton
Novell Knowledge Partner
SUSE Linux Enterprise 11 is ready for action.

UWC tabs have wrong UWC PORT listed in URL

Hello --
Platform JES 2005Q1 with latest available patches.
UWC without SSL works fine --
UWC on same Web instance with Identity.
Issue:
I add SSL-enable listen socket to Web Instance (UWC, Identity), update UWC for SSL (ssl enabled=yes, auth_only=no), update M62 config for SSL/IdentiySSO, and observe the following problem after log-in.
The UWC log-in event works correctly - SSL enabled.
The HREF tied to each UWC tab includes WRONG port to insure UWC works correctly.
Example: From UWC home (immediately after login).
Calendar tab:
https://mail.domain.com/history.html?https://mail.domain.com:0/uwc/base/UWCMain?forwardtodefview=true
Address Book tab:
https://mail.domain.com/history.html?https://mail.domain.com:0/uwc/abclient/AddressBook
Options tab:
https://mail.domain.com/history.html?https://mail.domain.com:0/uwc/base/MailOptions
NOTE the port = ":0" suffix on UWC. The value should be "8008" -- the port for SSL-enabled Web Instance where UWC and Identity are located.
If there an undocumented place to configure this value?? Otherwise, this seems like BUG -- or maybe work-around exists by modifying JSP's?
Where is this value determined?? How can I change??
This is my only problem. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
-G

I install the certificate in the web server and work perfect. In my browser put "https://host.domain.com/uwc" and send the certificate. (it's not my problem)
I install the web server on the port: 80 and https: 443
But I modify the parameter: uwcauth.ssl.authonly= true and the other parameter: uwcauth.ssl.enabled=false. I need UWC work with "authonly". I modify de file: uwcauth.properties. (and uwcauth.https.port: 443)
And ssl with authonly don't work.(note: in my browser I use https)
I, with Ethereal (program who scaning all the packages) I see my user name and password. if I put username: jane and password: 123yyy, I see this information with my program. In other work, My username and password don't encrypt!! I think, if i enable the parameter (uwcauth.ssl.authonly) I suppose don't see this parameters whit my program.
I configure with this link:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2661/6n4uetjru?q=authonly&a=view
I reed this informacion, and configure the 3 steps. And restart my web server and does work.
Exit addicional changes or configuration for enable ssl with authonly ?
Note: My UWC work correctly with no-ssl
Tks

BD64 - generate partner profile - outbound parameter; wrong receiver port

Hi all,
I'm using a distribution model (transaction BD64) for creating partner profiles in my system.
This works fine, exept for one thing.
The receiver port used in the outbound parameter is wrong.
It's using the tRFC port of the destination system instead of the tRFC port of the SAP XI/PI system.
If I send an Idoc it's now going directly to the destination system instead of going to XI/PI first.
I could modify this manually (which is a lot of work), but I would like to know how SAP determines which tRFC port is used when generating the partner profile and creating the outbound parameters.
Can anybody help me with this?
Reagrds,
Roy

Hi,
According to my knowledge, if you have a receiving logical system name is same as the RFC destination name, then the SAP will take the RFC destination properly and will generate the port automatically (for Ex: if you have a port A00..12 then it will create a port A..13). the generated port will be used in partner profile.
Or
Give a try by assign the RFC destination (The receiving logical system name and RFC destination name should be same) for a port and use it while generating the partner profile by using BD64 or SALE.
Regards,
Venu V

Wrong remote port number with TCP listener

Hi
I am sending data from a dsp with a network card over TCP/IP to my pc running labview7express. The data is received correctly, I use a 'TCP create listener' followed by a 'TCP wait on listener' to establish the connection, followed by a while loop with 'TCP read' in it.
The port returned by 'TCP create listener' is correct (1001), but somehow 'TCP wait on listener' returns 57345 as remote port!?
Also when using another port eg 1003 it still returns 57345..
Anyone knows how this erroneous portnumber is achieved?

stino wrote:
> Hi
> I am sending data from a dsp with a network card over TCP/IP to my pc
> running labview7express. The data is received correctly, I use a 'TCP
> create listener' followed by a 'TCP wait on listener' to establish the
> connection, followed by a while loop with 'TCP read' in it.
> The port returned by 'TCP create listener' is correct (1001), but
> somehow 'TCP wait on listener' returns 57345 as remote port!?
> Also when using another port eg 1003 it still returns 57345..
> Anyone knows how this erroneous portnumber is achieved?
Nothing wrong with that. A TCP/IP connection has ALWAYS two connection
ends with each of them using a port number. 1001 is the port of the
local listen socket (which needs to be fixed so that clients can connect
to a know
n server) in your LabVIEW application. 57345 is the port number
used by your software running on your DSP board. A client usually has no
fixed port number but allocates any port number not already in use. When
the listen socket receives a connection request it connects and passes
the connection with the local port 1001 and the remote port 57345
through TCP Wait On Listener to your application. Since you set up the
Listen Socket in Create Listener you already know its port number so TCP
Wait on Listener does only return the port number of the remote
connection end of your connection.
Rolf Kalbermatter
Rolf Kalbermatter
CIT Engineering Netherlands
a division of Test & Measurement Solutions

How is wsdl generated? Wrong soap:address...

We're using Apache in front of WLS and when the WSDL is generated for the service (i.e. from http:/URL/Service.jws) is contains a soap:address with port=80 instead of port=443 as it should.
This is a workshop generated jws.
I'm wondering how this soap:address in the generated WSDL is constructed. It must be some combination of wlw-runtime-config.xml, frontend host, etc. So far we haven't been able to find the right combo to make it work.
Thanx,
Max

If the WSDL file is a workshop generated one, then the soap:address port number must be the same as your Apache/WLS development server's port number when the WSDL file was generated. You will need to update it during the production move to point to your production server port.
<service name="MyService">
<port name="MyserviceSoap" binding="s0:MyServiceSoap">
<soap:address location="http://localhost:80/ctx/MyService.jws"/>
</port>
</service>

Wrong http - port called when calling BI iviews since SPS15

Dear all,
we have installed SPS15 to our BI stacks. Since that we cannot execute BI iviews out of PCD anymore.
In every case a wrong port (8080) is called instead of 55300.
All other java-based BI functionality (Webanalyzer, Broadcasting, Integrated Planning...) is doing fine - exclusively webtemplates that have been 'published to the portal' or added manually to the PCD do not work anymore. (Configuration status in the 'Diagnostics and Support Desktop Tool' is fully 'green'.
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards,
Dirk

Can you check and see whether the iView Property for the these iViews are set to SAP_LocalSystem.
There has been some changes from SPS 13 to accomodate FPN.
See note https://websmp230.sap-ag.de/sap/support/notes/1140854

Soap Port

HI Experts,
Is it possible to change the port that the system publishes on soap sender individually,
i mean that in each scenario, i will use a different port.

>Is it possible to change the port that the system publishes on soap sender individually, i mean that in each scenario, i will use a different port.
App server maintain various services on the different port. Example:Webservices uses transport protocol http(s) port to host this service. You cannot have different port for each scenario. BTw, why do you want different port for each scenario?

Whats wrong with port

hello
i have made simple video player http://83.149.241.81/chto/chtoPlayerTest/CHTOPlayer.html
it plays fms's streams (vod)
But customer cannot use it, he opens "log" (inside player), and log stops in line "FMS connecting to rtmp://83.149.241.81/vod"
Not any NetStatusEvent.NET_STATUS event fires
Using this tool (http://www.therealtimeweb.com/index.cfm/2004/10/2/fms-port-tester?CFID=851950&CFTOKEN=1871 6924) customer get this information
RTMP DEFAULT Success
RTMP 80 Failed
RTMP 443 Success
RTMP 1935 Failed
RTMPT DEFAULT Success
RTMPT 80 Success
RTMPT 443 Success
RTMPT 1935 Success
how can i set different port for VOD rtmp (or rtmpe)

Your port result looks little wierd to me - how RTMP DEFAULT return SUCCESS and RTMP 1935 Fail?

Frames forwarded to wrong access port

Hi,
my problem is quite simple:
I have an access port of my switch 3750 that receive frames that aren't for his mac-address -.-
System image file is "flash:c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-40.SE/c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-40.SE.bin"
Here the config:
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/11
description Server fisico test LACP
switchport access vlan 103
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
end
Acc-Dev-SAP02#show mac address-table interface GigabitEthernet1/0/11
          Mac Address Table
Vlan    Mac Address       Type        Ports
103    000a.e481.1b90    DYNAMIC     Gi1/0/11
Total Mac Addresses for this criterion: 1
The switch correctly show the mac-address of my ethernet port:
[root@server ~]# ifconfig management0 | grep -i ether
ether 00:0a:e4:81:1b:90 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
Now I assume that if I try to sniff the traffic on my ethernet card eth0 (I renamed it with udev) I should see only frame that have in the dest_ether my mac address but it is not so! Here a little sniff with tcpdump:
tcpdump -e -n -i management0 not port 22
14:43:52.434489 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 321: 172.25.240.27.57917 > 192.168.130.23.https: Flags [P.], seq 151:418, ack 1242, win 253, length 267
14:43:52.472355 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 113: 172.25.240.27.57917 > 192.168.130.23.https: Flags [P.], seq 418:477, ack 1242, win 253, length 59
14:43:52.473597 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 907: 172.25.240.27.57917 > 192.168.130.23.https: Flags [P.], seq 477:1330, ack 1301, win 253, length 853
14:43:52.479279 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 01:00:5e:00:00:66, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 114: 192.168.130.3.hsrp > 224.0.0.102.hsrp: HSRPv1
14:43:52.479813 00:00:0c:9f:f0:67 > 01:00:5e:00:00:66, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 114: 192.168.130.2.hsrp > 224.0.0.102.hsrp: HSRPv1
14:43:52.484884 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 74: 172.25.68.48.ldap > 192.168.130.23.36075: Flags [S.], seq 4028131841, ack 1191200232, win 8192, options [mss 1380,nop,wscale 8,sackOK,TS val 33737784 ecr 871056973], length 0
14:43:52.487582 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 88: 172.25.68.48.ldap > 192.168.130.23.36075: Flags [P.], seq 1:23, ack 39, win 513, options [nop,nop,TS val 33737784 ecr 871056973], length 22
14:43:52.488874 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 1974: 172.25.68.48.ldap > 192.168.130.23.36075: Flags [P.], seq 23:1931, ack 142, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 33737784 ecr 871056974], length 1908
14:43:52.489376 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: 172.25.68.48.ldap > 192.168.130.23.36075: Flags [R.], seq 1931, ack 149, win 0, length 0
14:43:52.491508 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 74: 172.25.68.48.ldap > 192.168.130.23.36076: Flags [S.], seq 3174971581, ack 1333951668, win 8192, options [mss 1380,nop,wscale 8,sackOK,TS val 33737785 ecr 871056974], length 0
14:43:52.493522 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 88: 172.25.68.48.ldap > 192.168.130.23.36076: Flags [P.], seq 1:23, ack 69, win 513, options [nop,nop,TS val 33737785 ecr 871056974], length 22
14:43:52.494018 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 66: 172.25.68.48.ldap > 192.168.130.23.36076: Flags [.], ack 77, win 512, options [nop,nop,TS val 33737785 ecr 871056975], length 0
14:43:52.494061 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 60: 172.25.68.48.ldap > 192.168.130.23.36076: Flags [R.], seq 23, ack 77, win 0, length 0
14:43:52.533119 d8:67:d9:7a:c2:44 > 00:0c:29:98:ee:48, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 74: 172.25.68.48.ldap > 192.168.130.23.36079: Flags [S.], seq 3291750511, ack 1947665179, win 8192, options [mss 1380,nop,wscale 8,sackOK,TS val 33737789 ecr 871056985], length 0
Anyone could explain to me because I receive traffic that should be for 00:0c:29:98:ee:48? It seems like the switch is working like an hub -.-
Thanks for help!

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Rick, I'm sure, has simplified "... so forwards to all ports in the vlan.", but just to note, that excludes the ingress port.

WSDL contains wrong HTTPS port

Hi All,
I am publishing a WSDL from an ICO (Integrated Configuration) object. The WSDL contains two URLs, one for HTTP and the other for HTTPS. All good so far. Unfortunately the URL for HTTPS refers to port 50001 when it should be using 443. I have used NWA (nwa_ssl) to confirm that the HTTPS port is actually 443.
How can we influence the HTTPS port in the WSDL? Where is this configured, any clues?
Thanks
Che
I know the URLs can be influenced when publishing the WSDL, but was wondering if the actual default setting can be influenced so I do not have to change the port when publishing:

Hello Che,
Check the location documented in 1583506 FQDN missing from generated WSDL URL in PI Directory. You can change the port here.
Regards
Mark

Wrong SOAP port?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for