WRX Error-For consumables posting with Acc Assignment K

We are doing a GR for consumables posting with account assignment category K (Cost centre). However, while trying to post the document, system issues a message that "Account determination for WRX cannot be determined".
Why this error is coming for consumables posting for a cost centre ? Is it standard or am I missing any configuration ?

Hi,
When you are booking a Consumption to a Cost Center at the time of GR, the entry whihc is passed is
Consupmtion A/c Dr
GR/IR Account Cr.
At the time of IR, the entry will be
GR/IR Account Dr.
Vendor A/c Cr.
So you will have to do the settings for the WRX for GR/IR account in OBYC.
Regards,
Amit
Edited by: amit kulkarni on Dec 2, 2009 5:19 PM

Similar Messages

Bapi for Transfer posting with clearing

Hello,
please let me know the bapi for Transfer posting with clearing for transcation F-04 or FB05.
quick reply wil be helpfull.
Thanks,
ram

Hi
I don't know in release greater than 4.7, but there isn't that BAPI.
There's a BAPI to post a document, but the clearing is an internal transaction so I don't believe there's a BAPI for it.
Anyway you can try to create one using the std BDC RFBIBL00: it suppoerts that transaction.
Max

Invoice verification for blanket PO with account assignment category U (un

Hi all
While doing miro when i am doing invoice verification for blanket PO with account assignment category U (unknown) system is not allowing me to enter the GL it is disable,wat can be the possible reason
Regards
shailesh

Hi Shailesh,
As you have maintained the account assignment category as U the account assignment tab will not be available. If you want to enter a GL account then use the Account assignments K or F or X.
Else if you want to use U in PO then you can give the GL account and other account assignment details only in the Invoice verification.
Regards,
Kathir

GR going to wrong GL account for PO Item with Account Assignment Category M

Hi Experts,
I need some help on GR posting for PO Item with M as AAC.
PO1 for material ABC with M as Account Assignment Category, when I book GR for this Item, the GL document generated as below.
Dr: PRD (Cost Price Differences)
Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
The material ABC price control is "S" and already have standard cost.
For another material DEF which have ascetically same master data as ABC and got a similar PO2 with M as Account Assignment Category.
But the GR document as below.
Dr: BSX (Inventory)
Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
How can be one same setting got so different results, is there any data in Material or PO make these differences?
Actually the results for material DEF is what we want, how could I avoid the GR results for material ABC.
Thanks~

Thanks you Mukthar,
I have checked all the information and porcess for both material and did a lot of testing in testing system.
Here is what I found.
Case
Material ABC SO: 1111 PO: 6666 (ACC:M)
Material DEF SO:2222 PO: 7777(ACC:M)
All the information in material mast data, SO, PO are the same.
The differences is that:
PO:6666 post GR before Material ABC's standard price release. So the first GR document as below
Dr: PRD (Cost Price Differences)
Cr: WRX (GR/IR)
This is correct document without material stand cost.
The problem we reverse the fist GR document, release standard cost for Material ABC. Then re-do the GR. but the GL document still book into PRD instead of BSX.
If I create a new SO:3333 and PO:8888 (with ACC M) for material ABC now.
The GR could be book into BSX.
It seem like once the PO got GR with 0 standard cost, even I relesed a new price for the material and re do the GR, it still take the previous 0 cost to book inventory which make all the amount into PRD.
Quite Strange

Goods receipt for purchase order with account assignment 'K'

Hello All,
There are couple of purchase orders with acc.*** "K". On doing the GR for these PO's they have been done with mvt type 103 & mvt typ 105.
I understand that material has been directly consumed to the respective cost center.
How do track the internal movement for these materials??
I need to view the stock for these materials at the cost center as in MMBE the stock is seen as ZERO.
All these materials are with QM proc ACTIVE. So a goods receipt is done 105, then the inspection lot is cleared. However, in this case as the material is directly consumed, it is NOT displayed in QA32.
Is the above procedure correct??? Is it better to receive stock against mvt type 101 & then do a 201 mvt ??
Request your inputs.....
Regards,
Manoj Reddy

Account assignment inventories are not maintained. To maintain a report for cost center receiving/issuing you need to make a customized report with help of ABAP.
Other way is to pull report in MB51, with selection criteria COST CENTER and it will give you result of stocks available on cost center. For stocks received on cost center, you can pull report with cost center and movement 101.
201 is used for goods issue to cost center from warehouse, the stock you receive from PO against 101 is directly charged to cost center, so no need to issue later to cost center.
Edited by: Afshad Irani on May 17, 2010 2:17 PM

About cost center accounting (Transaction based posting with CO assignment

Hi,
I m working on cost center accounting ,and i m stuck in transaction based posting ,i m post transaction through FB50,
i m given concern G/L account Dr 8000 and credit to bank account with account assignment cost center 10100.after i simulate this transaction the system accepts and i m enable to see the transacion after simulation,but after that i m going for save it at this time system geting error ,and error is like ---
Not possible to derive owner from account assignment/bank details
Message no. REEXFI054
Diagnosis
In the condominium owner company code, the system attempts to determine a unique condominium owner for each document.
To make this determination, the system analyzes:
The profit centers in the document. Usually the system derives the profit centers from the account assignment objects in the individual line items. In the condominium owner company code, the system determines the profit center for real estate objects from the condominium management contract for the rental object.
The house bank data in the document. Therefore, the affected bank account has to be entered uniquely in each bank line item. You can enter the house bank and the account ID in FI posting transactions by choosing Additional Data. The system then searches for the condominium management contract that has these bank details.
In the current case, the system is not able to determine a unique owner.
System Response
The system cannot post the document.
Procedure
Check the account assignment data and bank details.
So plz guide me about this ,
Regards,
Pramod Kulkarni

Hello again,
First off all thank you both for your answers.
Dirk,
When I said enhancing I was not thinking of developing the hole thing. That seems to be a hugely complex task and I do not have the time for that in the project were I am presently working. What I meant was: Is there a SAP Enhancement available? A function exit? A Customer Include? Something that is half way done?
If this is not the case the solutions I thougth were:
i) Replicate my infocube's data into a ODS. Develop a report on the R/3 side that reads that data via a RFC and uses Batch Input (Call transaction) to update the data on the R/3 side;
ii) Develop a function module (similar to the standard one) on the BW side to use in a planning function of type exit which would update a Z database table on the R/3 side and, afterwards, develop a report (also on the R/3 side) which would read that database table and update transactional tables via Batch Input (or Call Transaction with a developed log transaction).
From the point of view of performance I believe the solution involving the ODS is better because we are talking about 300 000 materials.
As for your proposed solutions 1) and 2) althougth they seem very nice and elegant I would like to avoid changing the R/3 customizing. Regarding your proposed solution 3) I am going to take a look at the function group you mentioned and the respective note.
Once again thanks a lot for your answer. You have been very helpfull.
Best Regards,
Vasco

BORGR 649 error message while posting with 105 mov type

Hi Gurus,
I faced a problem when I try to post with 105 mov type, when material doc is related to Inbound delivery.
Explained better:
I did a purchase order with inbound delivery confirmation.
I carried out Good Receipt (related to Inb delievery) with mov type 103 (blocked stock from PO)
When I try to post stock with 105 mov type, the following error appear:
"Movement type 105 not allowed as it is not assigned to item category"
Msg ID: BORGR
Msg no: 649
I already checked delivery item category configuration, movement types involved and transactions allowed for each mov types.
Take care that the error mentioned doesn't occur if posting is related directly to purchase order, instead of inbound delivery..
Thanks in advance
Regards
Ale

Hi Sandra_PF
in the inbound delivery the mov type is not 105, but 101 (correct, it's the default value for Inb delivery)
With transaction MIGO I do 2 different operations (in 2 different moments):
1°) Good Receipt referred to Inbound delivery (103 mov type - Blocked stock from PO)
2°) Stock posting with 105 mov type, to transfer stock from Blocked to Unrestricted
Here the system notice me that is not possible, because the mov type 105 is not assigned to the delivery inboud category.
Please note that we did the same thing in another system with the same configuration, without any problems..
Cheers,
Ale

Goods delivery error for transfer posting

I have created a P.O for transfer posting for a material from Plant 2000 to plant 3000.where in my account assignment I have mentioed the WBS element.
created the delivery document---VL10B and outbound delivery VL01N.
during PGI, system gives error that no WBS element has been assigned.I went to item level and in financial posting TAB page I could not locate the same WBS number in the filed, which is not editable too.the movement type is 641.
Please advcie what other things to check.
Zinni

Check your delivery type which copy control and how this value is passing.I think through some routine it is populated.Check the routine in VOFM transaction.

PR overall release strategy with acc. assignment category characteristics

Hi,
Here is my issue : i created an Overall release strategy but the characteristic is on item level. In some precise cases, no release is generated.
see below more details :
I have created the following PR release strategy with classification.
PR type concerned " NB": overall release
Rlease group concerned : overall release
In this release group i have 1 class
in this class i have 2 characteristics : PR type and Account assignement category.
Release strategy 1 :
PR type = NB
Acc. assignment cat = P, W
Release strategy 2:
PR type = NB
Acc. assignment cat = K, V
TEST 1 : PR type NB, 1 item with P category
OK the release strategy 1 is generated
TEST 2 : PR type NB, 1 item with W category
OK the release strategy 1 is generated
TEST 3 : PR type NB, 2 items with P category
OK the release strategy 1 is generated
TEST 4 : PR type NB, 2 items with P and W category
TEST KO, no release strategy is generated
=> what should i do to solve this issue ?
Thank you in advance for your quick answers,
Isabelle

What is the specific requirement for Overall release strategy?
Besides, once you go for Overall release strategy, you cannot have another release strategy at item level.
Every line item generates a PO, so logically should be set to a release strategy.
Bottomline is use release strategy at line item level Unless a specific reason exists.
Regards,
Sameer

Extended Notification not working for Dialog Task with agent assignment

Hi Friends,
I have an issue where I have a user decision step and a sub workflow contains a dialog task with agent assignment.
Extended notification is configured properly and is working properly for user decision step but its not working for the dialog task created as an activity.
Batch jobs are configured to run report SWN_SELSEN.
I was checking SDN and found this discussion handy :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw73ehp1/helpdata/en/4f/3bed495cc018c8e10000000a42189e/content.htm
One thing that wonders me is that notifications show up in SOST 4-5 seconds before the user decision step starts execution.
See screenshot from SOST and WF log.
SOST log :
2 questions here: Why is notification not being sent for Dialog task?
Why is user decision notification being sent that early even before the User decision task starts execution?
Please provide your valuable inputs.
Regards,
Sandip

An activity step with agents is supported by the extended notifications if it is a decision task or not, I have used it many times and it works well just no approval/rejection links if it's not a decision task.
From your screenshot you can see that a mail has been created and is found in SOST, usually this cases are problems with the mail server or connection to it, check the mail settings in the SMTP node in transaction SCOT, also check with mail server team if there is a block to/from the SAP server.

Negative stock allowed for a material with SDG assigned

Hi All ,
I have raw material for which stock determination group assigned in MRP 2 view for issuing the componets .
I also marked allow negative stock in plant/storage location view .
Normally if the stock determination group is not assigned and if the negative stock allowed in plant/storagelocation is checked then during backflush though the required qunatity is not availabe then the stock will be marked in negative quantities , so that when GR happens for this material will overcome the negative quantity .
But since stock determination group is assigned , though the negative stock allowed is checked the backlogs are created in MF47 rather making the stock of the material negative [ I assume this behaviour is because the SDG is determined dynamically ]
Is there any setting required to not sit these backlogs in MF47 when the negative stock allowed in plant/storagelocation is checked
Thanks
Sireesha

Hello Sireesha,
Even I have similar issue, can you please let me know if this is fixed for and how did it work.
Thanks
Chandra

Error in MCH1 table update for batch create with class assignment

Hi Experts,
I am looking for a BAPI which could help me to assign a class and in respectively assigns characteristics to th batch.
and hence i cant update MCH1 table for the same.
so please suggest me how could i achieve the same.
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Ashish

Hello,
You can use the BAPI BAPI_OBJCL_CHANGE.
Regards,
Alok Tiwari

GR for purchase order with Account assignment E

Hello All
I am having a scenario where in the BOM structure is as under: A->B->C--->D, D is the raw material, C is the component produced in-house, B is the material which we procure through subcontracting, in the material master of C SPK:30 is used for subcontracting, & A is in-house produced material with purely MTO scenario (20 - strategy).
Once the sales order of A is there we run MRP for it, as per the master data settings described above we get purchase requisition for D & when I convert it to purchase order it is having account assignment as E.
This is all well but the moment I try to save it, system throws an error stating: 'G/L account 20500100 cannot be used (please correct)". This G/L account is of raw material itself.
Can you please guide me to overcome this problem.
I am looking forward to listen from you soon.
Regards,
J K Tharwani

Hi
Check the OBYC settings for this transaction, assign the correct G/L for this transaction. Try to get the help from MM consultant to resolve this.
Check in BSX Transaction for the invetroy posting.
Check the G/L account it is exist for your company code.
Take the G/L account which is coming in the error message and go to FS00 t code select tab Create/blank/interest , there you will have field status group just double click on that . It will take you to field status group display in that check the combination of the selection.
Thanks
S.Murali
Edited by: S. Murali on Jun 26, 2009 5:07 PM
Edited by: S. Murali on Jun 26, 2009 5:19 PM

Classic Scenario_Tolerances error for GR posting in SRM

Hi,
I am getting error "quantity too high" and "System status is INCM is active" when i try to post goods receipt in SRM. we are on SRM5 and under classic scenario. For the shopping cart, i posted PO with 10% over tolerances,which is configured already and system allowed to create PO with over delivery tolerance.
Where as when i try to post GR against this PO, i am getting this error. i think SRM checks against PO while posting GR for any tolerances.
Here is example: SC qty is 100, PO qty is 110 (10% over delivery tol is setup) ,in GR i am confirming against PO qty 110 ,i am getting error.
All my tolerances were setup in ECC only. I haven't set up any tolerances in SRM and in org structure.
Appreciate any inputs.
thanks
Krish
Edited by: Krishna on Feb 3, 2009 9:03 PM
Edited by: Krishna on Feb 3, 2009 10:41 PM

Hi ,
Same as backend we need to maitain tolerence in SRM also there is attribute TOG
where we have to maintain the values.
for Maitaining the Tol key goto T.code BBPCTOL
you can maintain the limits here
Hope thiswill help you
Best Regards
Edited by: CK on Feb 4, 2009 8:52 AM

Access Denied Error For Shared Folder with Win Server 2008R2 Task Manager Scheduled Task

Hi,
I have scheduled a Task with the Task scheduler. It invokes an .EXE file after every 5 min.
The application is supposed to access some files lying on a different Server's shared path, process them and move them across folders on the Shared path only.
Problem: When the .EXE gets executed from the Task scheduler, I am getting "Access Denied to the Shared path" error. I have already given Full Control to Everyone as well as to the Account with which the Task has been configured with.
Another important point to note is, if I run the .EXE manually, the solution is able is able to do everything intended; I don't get any Access Denied error.
Kindly help me with what needs to be done in order that this issue is resolved. This is really urgent for me.
Thanks a lot in advance..
AC

Hello Alex,
first of all, make sure your task was correctly create: How to Create Advanced Tasks with the Task
Scheduler.
Please, read these:
TechNet Library Task Security Context
TechNet Forums post How
does "Run with the highest privileges" really work in Task Scheduler ? - Look at the answer "...When you want to run a program with admin rights from a standard user account, you have to select "run whether the user is logged
on or not" and select a user which is member of the admingroup."
TechNet Forums post
Log on as batch job right (written on previous post)
serverfault Task Scheduler is not executing the program
serverfault
unable to schedule a task (access denied)
UAC: Do you receive the User Account Control "Windows need your permission to continue" message to approve the scheduled application ?
If yes, maybe "Run with highest privileges" option will not take precedence of the UAC. While the Admin Approval Mode for built-in Administrator account is enabled, UAC will still ask for approval according to the settings on the Behavior
of elevation to prompt for the administrators. Check whether the "User Account Control: Admin Approval Mode for built-in Administrator account" is enabled. If yes, disable it or change the setting on "User Account Control: Behavior
of elevation to prompt for the administrators" to elevate without prompting.
Local Computer Policy ---> Computer Configuration ---> Windows Settings ---> Security Settings ---> Local policies ---> Security Options (source: Task
Scheduler "run with highest privileges": does not work on Windows Server 2008 ?)
Bye,
Luca
Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees, and confers no rights. Whenever you see a helpful reply, click on [Vote As Help] and click on [Mark As Answer] if a post answers your question.

WRX Error-For consumables posting with Acc Assignment K

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for