WS-Security Encrypted Response

Hi,
When I call a WS-Security web service (in WLS 8.1 SP3), it works fine until I set it to encrypt the response. Then I get
java.rmi.RemoteException: SOAP Fault:javax.xml.rpc.soap.SOAPFaultExc
eption: Exception during processing: weblogic.utils.AssertionError: ***** ASSERT
ION FAILED *****[ Unable to secure response ] - with nested exception:
[java] [weblogic.xml.stream.XMLStreamException: Object not initialized. - w
ith nested exception:
[java] [weblogic.xml.security.encryption.EncryptionException: Object not in
itialized. - with nested exception:
[java] [com.rsa.jsafe.JSAFE_InvalidUseException: Object not initialized.]]]
(see Fault Detail for stacktrace)
[java] Detail:
[java] <detail>
[java] <bea_fault:stacktrace xmlns:bea_fault="http://www.bea.com/servers
/wls70/webservice/fault/1.0.0">com.rsa.jsafe.JSAFE_InvalidUseException: Object n
ot initialized.
[java] at com.rsa.jsafe.JG_BlockCipher.encryptUpdate(JG_BlockCipher.jav
a:652)
[java] at weblogic.xml.security.encryption.CipherWrapper$JSafeCipherWra
pper.update(CipherWrapper.java:277)
etc.
Any ideas ?
Dave
UK

Looks like a problem in the key pair mis-matched. i.e: domestic strength key vs. foreign

Similar Messages

Since the most recent Firefox update 3.6.8 by banking institution no longer shows as having a secure encrypted connection, however, my bank assures me all is well with their certificates and that is a problem with the new Firefox browser update, can you g

Since the most recent Firefox update 3.6.8 my banking institution no longer shows as having a secure encrypted connection, however, my bank assures me all is well with their certificates and that is a problem with the new Firefox browser update, can you give me some idea why it is doing this?
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== Right after the new Firefox update

Hello Anne.
Can you please try it in a new (temporary) Firefox profile and see if the issue is still present? See [http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Managing+profiles this article] to know how to create a new Firefox profile. Please report back the results.

Weblogic.security.Encrypt

Have been a long time user of weblogic security So far it always used 3DES
Recently with 11gR1 (we are using Weblogic Portal which internally uses weblogic Server Securiy)
I went into the domain directory
typed
java weblogic.security.Encrypt mypass
Got back a encrypted string which is AES encrypted
type the same command Again after 1 minute
Got back a different string which is AES encrypted
In previous release I never saw this. We are using bundled jrockit on Red hat 5.3 as the OS here
I was expecting the utility to always return the same encrypted password every time I run it ? Not sure if this is a bug or just the way AES encryption behaves
Which encrypted password should I use in the jdbc config.xml ?
Is there a way to use 3DES versus AES (some switch which controls this behavior at server level)
Thanks
Yesh

its an expected behavior that you dont see the same encrypted string as a dynamic vector is used as the hash value.
Since hash is different all the time, encrypted string is different.
You can use both AES/DES without a problem.

Weblogic.security.Encrypt -and- Not enough space

This post has two questions.
I have a simple application on wls9.2 that is a web front end to the weblogic.security.Encrypt command line utility. It seems to work fine, but after a little bit of use I am seeing the following:
java.io.IOException: Not enough space
at java.lang.UNIXProcess.forkAndExec(Native Method)
at java.lang.UNIXProcess.<init>(UNIXProcess.java:53)
at java.lang.ProcessImpl.start(ProcessImpl.java:65)
at java.lang.ProcessBuilder.start(ProcessBuilder.java:451)
at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:591)
at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:429)
at java.lang.Runtime.exec(Runtime.java:326)
at encrypt.wls92Encrypt(Unknown Source)
at encrypt.doGet(Unknown Source)
at encrypt.doPost(Unknown Source)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:763)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:223)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:283)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:175)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3245)
at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:121)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2003)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:1909)
at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1359)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:209)
at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:181)
1) Here is the forking code:
try {
proc = Runtime.getRuntime().exec("java -Dweblogic.RootDirectory="+rootDir+" weblogic.security.Encrypt "+password);
BufferedReader bf=new BufferedReader(new InputStreamReader(proc.getInputStream()));
line=bf.readLine();
bf.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
Is there a better way to do this, without forking? Seems odd to execute a java call, in java, just to get the encrypted string. I'd like to call weblogic.security.Encrypt inline, but have been unable to do so.
2) Why would the Not enough space error creep up? Researching it, it seems like it is a swap problem, but that does not seem to be the case on our system. A top shows:
Memory: 8192M phys mem, 2769M free mem, 5004M swap, 5004M free swap
at the time of failure. Disk usage is looking great as well. The JVM heapsize is around 80% free. An lsof on the system shows about 150 open files on the managed server.
Any ideas on how to troubleshoot this would be appreciated.
Thanks

I use CCleaner from the AppStore to delete the 'useless' stuff. It's free and works great for me

⁂ OSX 4.5 Announced this morning w/process Security Incedent Response Websi

See: Crashing Missing Disappearing iTunes OS X 4, & AntiPiracy/Licensing Scripts
Thank You Apple
I Just woke up and saw the announcement
I did not call Tech Support.
Very good news AND a Policy Statement link w/process Security Incedent Response Website (which Tech Support would probably have refered me to ...had I called)
Contacting Apple- Apple Product Security -apple.com/support/security
Mac OS X Update 10.4.5
in the details of the download, Please refer to:
About this update
Mac OS X Update 10.4.5
http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/macosxupdate1045.html
specifically html link #3
For detailed information on Security Updates, please visit this website: http: http://www.info.apple.com/kbnum/n61798
iMac G5, 20, 2.1GHz PowerPC, 1 GB, 250 HD (Purch Date: 01/19/06) Mac OS X (10.4.4) Just installed the initial full set of activation updaters

You guys are great!
[email protected]

Firefox is up to date. need 128 bit security encryption

My firefox is up to date. In order to get paperless statements from credit cards I need to have 128 bit security encryption. Card company checked browser and did not continue to make the change to paperless, due to the fact that 128 bit security encryption was not found; also read that: you need to update your browser.
How do I get this encryption? thank you

Can't you bypass that test?<br />
There is usually a link on the page to continue anyway and ignore the check for the encryption check.
If websites complain about 128 bit encryption not available then that can be caused by the "U;" that is no longer present in the user agent of Firefox 4+ versions.
* https://developer.mozilla.org/en/User_Agent_Strings_Reference
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_agent#Encryption_strength_notations
*[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572668 bug 572668] - Remove the crypto strength token from the UA string
Firefox supports 256 bit encryption ciphers (AES-256) since 2003 in Firebird 0.6, so all Firefox versions have 128 bit and 256 bit encryption.
* https://www.fortify.net/sslcheck.html

In trying to set up an online account, a diagnostic informed me that I should update my browser to accept 128 bit security encryption. How do I accomplish this? I already have Firefox 4.

I can't understand why my browser would not be compatible with 128 bit security encryption. Have set up several other accts with no issues. What are possible problems related to this non-compatibility?

Firefox 4 supports AES-256 (256 bit) encryption in addition to 128 bit since Firefox 2 in 2002.
* https://www.fortify.net/cgi/ssl_2.pl
Can you post a link to that page?

Is the security encryption in Mozilla browser 128 bit or higher? I have a site that requires confirmation before I can use it.

Just an information question, not a problem. A site that I want to use on line securely to transfer funds requires that I confirm that my browser supports or has 128 bit security encryption. The site offers to check my browser, which I did and it comes up saying that I don't meet 128-bit security encryption standard or something to that effect. I believe I have the latest version of Firefox/Mozilla installed -- updated just last week (Sept 8th, 2011).
Does this browser have 128-bit security encryption?

Firefox versions since Firefox 2 in in 2002 support AES-256 as you can see used on this forum.
*https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Security_in_Firefox_2
*https://www.fortify.net/sslcheck.html

No Security Encryption shown when purchasing onlin...

I just decided to get a online telephone number in the US and it displayed the last 4 digits of my credit card but the encryption security logo was not displayed. I am running win7 with the latest updates so I do not understand why you do not display this security logo.
Please tell us why?

I went back and took a second look and i found the problem which is rather disturbing. The security logo is not displayed as it should be, instead you get a lock displayed as you go into you're account. That is pure rubbish. The security encryption logo should be displayed when you are in a secure encryption environment.
Also equally disturbing is you have set up two pending purchases to my credit card for
an online number which you say is being held for 19 days.
There is no way to cancel this that is obvious.
My whole outlook of Skype has changed.
I want a way to remove these impending charges to my account.
I have been shopping online for over ten years and never run into anything as sleazy as the way you do with this pending charges to credit cards with no way to cancel these pending charges.
I would like someone who can correct this matter to contact me and explain this policy and remove these so called pending charges.

HP Secure Encryption testing

Hi,
I'm interning this summer with HP and I just finished installing HP Secure Encryption on our HP Proliant DL380p gen8 server. I need to prove that encryption is working but can't find how to test that it's working. I can't find any guides for using HP Secure Encryption.
Thanks in advance,
Matthew

I have been a part of a few Beta and Delta programs in the past. Basically you sign up and then as opportunities come up you will get an email invite. You then go apply for specific programs.
I will send you a PM with information on signing up.
Bob Headrick, HP Expert
I am not an employee of HP, I am a volunteer posting here on my own time.
If your problem is solved please click the "Accept as Solution" button ------------V
If my answer was helpful please click the "Thumbs Up" to say "Thank You"--V

Security encryption for Original Airport Card?

I recently purchased and installed an Apple Original Airport card(802.11b) for my iBook G3 running OSX Tiger(10.4.8). All available written documentation that I've obtained is telling me that the card is only 128 bit WEP encryption capable. However, I have been able to log onto my home network and access the internet via my router which is configured for WPA-PSK security encryption.
Now, my question is? Do I have a problem with my home network security if I'm able to access it with a wireless card that is not supposed to be able to access it? Has anyone else encountered this?

Hey Guys,
I have a small problem with setting up our WIFI network!
I have a G3 IBOOK Clemshell & a PC XP SP2 both on the WIFI Network. Right now i just removed the SSID and i enabled MAC filtering. But i want to secure our Network more, but how do i do that.
How do i know, which WPA i need to take?
I have a Belkin router/ Modem and i can choose WPA/WPA2-Personal (PSK)but than i have a field for "Authentication" what do i need to choose there? the options are: WPA-PSK, WPA2-PSK or WPA-PSK + WPA2-PSK. after that i have this field "Encryption Technique" and i can choose TKIP, AES or TKIP+AES! what to take???
I know, so many questions,
but first of all, i am quite new to APPLE and to WIFIs so a lot to learn, i really do hope, you can give me a hand!
Best Regards,
Jan

Encrypted response from a SOAP Sender???

Hi,
I am implementing a WS scenario SOAP<->XI<->RFC securing the exchanges (SOAP<->XI) using WSS .
The scenario works fine with an encrypted SOAP request but I would also need the SOAP response to be encrypted...
I have my communication channel configured to use the Security Profile (WSS) and a Sender agreement configured with the keys for the decryption.
I do not understand how to achieve the encryption of the SOAP response as only the decryption options are available on the sender agreement...
Please help!!!
Thanks,
Adalbert

Adalbert,
if you have have selected "Select Security Profile" in the sender soap communication channel, you should see two fields for Security Settings in the Sender Agreement, one for the request and one for the response.
Check this out: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/1f/7e2441509fa831e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
What version/SP of XI are you in?
Regards,
Henrique.

Ios security - encryption - where is it?

hi all,
     I read reports and apple's statements saying ios 8 is so secure and encrypted that law enforcement find it difficult to crack it. I used my iphone 6 with ios 8.1.1 on ubuntu linux and also windows 7 with ifunbox.
    It doesn't matter if the phone is locked prior to this or not. The entire filesystem is accessible. I can see pictures, apps, ebooks, podcasts, safari data, itunes purchases, voice recordings, icloud sharing data directly. The files can be opened and viewed, there's no encryption for any of the things I mentioned, even if the phone was locked.
   This works even for ios 6 - 8, with iphone 4s, iphone 5 and iphone 5s and iphone 6. I can't located emails, imessages and contacts as yet, but maybe by digging more into the filesystem, you could find those.
   So my question is - what exactly are people who are against ios encryption complaining about? But more importantly, what does apple mean when it says that it's implemented a high level of security with system wide encryption?
This is apple's official link which talks about it: https://www.apple.com/privacy/privacy-built-in/
It mentions icloud data (including photos), health app, imessage, mail and other stuff.
I am attaching these images: Could someone shed more light on this?

sure, but how is it relevant that its "my computer"? Maybe in windows, but there's no itunes trust in linux. the phone is locked and I didn't click "trust this computer" when I connected using linux.
so effectively its anyone's computer.

How do I change security encryption name on WiFi network so computer will stop kicking me off Internet?

My Internet provider, Verizon, recently had me update my router to WPA2 encryption. It was previously WEP. Now, each time my computer goes to sleep it drops off the Internet and when I click on the Network icon on the top menu bar it asks again which network. I select it and then a box pops up that says this was previously a WEP network and not a WPA2 - do I want to join. I click "join" and then get on the Internet, but it is very annoying to keep doing this over and over. I went into the settings menu for "Network" and tried a number of things to change the network security designation to WPA2 w/o success. I also tried deleting the current network, restarting my computer and reselecting a network, but that didn't work either. Verizon walked me through their methods to correct this and it didn't work. The problem seems to be my computer has not recognized the change. How can I fix the change to my router? It seems as though it should be simple, but I can't find it. I have OSX 10.9.5, Memory 4 GB and Processor 2.5 GHz Intel Core i5. Thanks for any assistance you can provide.

Thank you Eric. This seems to have solved the problem. Now the only network that shows is my WiFi with the new encryption name. I appreciate your help.
Carol G

SOAP receiver - Message level security - Encryption

Hello,
I want to use message level security when using HTTPS. Client provided us the encryption certificate which we have uploaded in the keystore, also done the necessary settings in PI 7.1 but we are getting the below mentioned error.
Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: com.sap.aii.security.lib.exception.SecurityException: SecurityException in method: apply( Message, CPALookupObject ). Message: SecurityException in method: apply( Message, CPALookupObject ). WSSEThread-Exception: SecurityException in method: run(). Message: Connection timed out: connect. To-String: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect; To-String: com.sap.aii.security.lib.exception.SecurityException: SecurityException in method: run(). Message: Connection timed out: connect. To-String: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect. To-String: com.sap.aii.security.lib.exception.SecurityException: SecurityException in method: apply( Message, CPALookupObject ). WSSEThread-Exception: SecurityException in method: run(). Message: Connection timed out: connect. To-String: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect; To-String: com.sap.aii.security.lib.exception.SecurityException: SecurityException in method: run(). Message: Connection timed out: connect. To-String: java.net.ConnectException: Connection timed out: connect
Thanks & Regards,
Rahul Nawale

I agree
Try executing a Full CPA Cache refresh.

WS-Security Encrypted Response

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for