XI Dev. connected to ECC Dev and ECC Qas

Hello Folks,
I have a question -
We have 2 XI systems: Development, and Production (no QAS)
And 3 ECC systems: Dev, Qas and Prd.
Now we have the XI Dev connected to the ECC Dev.
I'd like to know if it's possible to also connect the XI Dev System to the ECC Qas system.
I mean, to create the RFC dest. in both systems, a new Business System for ECC QAS; and all the necessary config.... and if it won't take problems when we have to transport the Interfaces from DEV to PRD.
Thanx in advance.
Juan

Hi juan,
just be carefull when you add you QUA config in ID and then when you will transport...
1. in your ID, when will define the config with QUA, do NOT ADD the object to your Scenario.... if for the transport you choose the option "Transport all objects of my Scenario"... else you will have a problem in Prod because of the system QUA. Indeed with transport DEV become PROD but your ECC QUA cannot become ...
2. when you will transport to your PI prod :
- check my first point or use option "Transport by selecting each objects" and choose only object linked link to your DEV.
- delete also the Condition option (if you have one) in the Receiver Determination if in th receivers list you have DEV and QUA.... because after the transport the ECC QUA become nothing.
So yes we can. There is no technical issue.... if you do properly the things !!
Regards.
Mickael

Similar Messages

What is the difference between ECC 5 and ECC 6.0

Dear Experts,
Can any one tell me in detail the difference between SAP R/3 versions ECC 5 and ECC 6 functionality wise in MM mdoule?
To be specific what are the new features in MM being added in ECC 6.0 when compared with ECC 5.
Request your help in this regard.
Rgds,
Uzair
Edited by: Mohd Uzair Hussain on Jul 23, 2008 5:35 PM

Hi,
Refer following link;
[SAP ERP Solution Browser|http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/]
Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned;
Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
- Goods receipt
- Goods issue
- Transfer posting
- Remove from storage
u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
Requirement prioritizations in materials management
u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
Mass maintenance of outline agreements
The following two transactions available:
u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
Commitment plan for purchase contracts
u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
- To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
- Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
- Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
- Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
- 107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
- 109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
Prepayment of invoices
This functionality is characterized as follows:
u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
Parking service items
It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
u2022 This Report is available with u201CNon-Hierarchyu201D display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location

Connection between webdynpro java and ECC.

Hi experts,
I am very new to webdynpro java, I want to learn webdynpro java since I know little bit of java.
So here is my question,
I want to connect my webdynpro java to ECC to get data from ECC and display it on front end and as well i want to send data to ECC, can anyone help me to resolve this one.
Thanks and Regards,
Santoshkumar.

Hi Santosh,
This is pretty basic stuff in the world of Web Dynpro Java - I'd suggest you search SCN, read content on help.sap.com and then come back here with more specific questions. All anyone can do to answer your current question is search for you and post links to documents that you could find for yourself.
Cheers,
G.

Connection Between Solution Manager and ECC

Dear Techies,
I would like to install SAP Solution Manager in one laptop and ECC on another laptop. Both the laptops have very good configuration in terms of operating system (both have server editions) , RAM ( 8GB each) and Hard Drive ( 600 GB each). Once the installation is completed, is there any way that I can establish connection between both the laptops over the same internet/wifi ? I would like to ensure connection is established successfully and data transfer is happening between both the systems. Many thanks for your answers in advance.

Hi Arun,
Please check below -
Create A Quick Ad Hoc Wireless Network Connection Between Two Computers In Windows 7/Vista
Best Regards,
Tanmeya

How One EP Portal will connect the 2 Different System(ECC Europe,China)

Hi Friends,
I have one more doubt on Multi region Functionality. Here we are using single EP Portal. Depending up on user we are able to connect to the ECC System.
Ex: Here we are using 2 ECC Systems( ECC Europe and ECC China). In Portal ECC Europe is login into the Portal he will be able to connect ECC Europe System through ECC Europe Model data and Meta Data like as ECC China user Login into the Portal he will be able to connect ECC China System through ECC China System Model data and Meta Data.
How can I do this work. Can you tell me. What type of coding I can write here. Please give Help.
Regards
VijayK

Hi Vijay,
Not just multiple Systems/JCos needed, you also need multiple souce objects to connect to multiple Systems/JCos.
In your case you need multiple iView (applications), and configure them to connect to different back-end systems.
You got to modify the Application Parameter of WD iView objects saperately to talk to different systems.
Reason, you cannot make one application to use multiple JCo destinations at any point of time.
Thanks,
MS

ECC dev to new PI sandbox to be point in ABAP proxy configuration

Hi All ,
We are testing ABAP proxy configuration between ECC Dev and PI new system (sand box) .
FYI : Currently ABAP proxy configuration running fine between ECC DEV and PI DEV system .
Now we have to testing ABAP proxy configuration between ECC Dev and PI new system (sand box) .
Pls advise what needs to be done.
thanks

Dear All,
Any relation between SLD and Abap proxy configuration ?
FYI:
1,ECC SLD is running fine with PI DEV sysytem (PI7.1).
2,in ECC SAPSLDAPI RFC destination program id is pointing to PI DEV system .
3,In Ecc LCRSAPRFC RFC destination program id is pointing to PI DEV system .
4, PI DEV system is PI7.1
5, PI Sandbox is PI 7.4 SP06 (note : currently we are testing all the interface , PI scenario in new sand box - it is newly upgraded PI system . )
6.In ECC SXMB_adm -> Role of Business System -> Application system
Corresponding Integ. Server -> dest://RFCDESTINATION (H connection type RFC created in ECC SM59.
Below is my question.
1, Latest PI version required H og G type connection ?
2, SLD (sldapicust,lcrsaprfc,sldapicust,rz70)related information needs to point to PI new upgraded dsystem for ABAP proxy testing in new sand box?
pls advise.

RFC connection error between BW 3.5 and ECC 6.0

Hi gurus,
We've defined an RFC destination between BW 3.5 and ECC 6.0. Connection test (SM59) is ok, but authorization one fails and ALEREMOTE users block. These users on both systems have good profiles. We look ST22 and find a runtime error on CALL_FUNCTION_REMOTE_ERROR. We've cleaned source system on BW and RFC destination and we've created one more time, but error doesn't disappear. We've looked OSS but don't find anything.
Any idea? Is there any other place (users, RFC) where we have to change user password on system?
Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Iván.
Edited by: Iván Cabezas Castillo on Nov 6, 2009 12:09 PM

Solved!
This is because of the incompatibility of password handling between
640 and 700 systems.
We have to use a maximum 8 character long password with only capital letters (numbers are also allowed) for the user "ALEREMOTE".
1. Change the password for the user in SAP R/3.
2. Maintain the password in SAP BW for the RFC destination (transaction SM59 - Logon/Security tab)
3. Authorization test is now successful.
(SM59 - Test - Authorization).
Regards!

Connection SEM 4.0 and BW 3.5, after upgrade R/3 4.6C to ECC 6.0

Hello experts,
Currenctly my customer has the following systems:
BW 3.5 with software component SEM 4.0
R/3 4.6C without software component SEM
ECC 6.0 with software component SEM 6.0 (Development system, I cannot connect the BW system to this one!)
Next week my customer is going to upgrade R/3 4.6C to ECC 6.0 (Test system).
I have to investigate if this upgrade does not influence the communication between SEM 4.0 and BW 3.5, if I connect BW 3.5 to ECC 6.0.
According to the blog: /people/karen.comer/blog/2006/12/19/confused-about-business-planning-releases-between-sap-sem-and-sap-netweaver-bi
SAP SEM is an add-On on top of SAP BW / SAP NetWeaver BI.
This blog also states that:
SEM 4.0 should work with BW 3.5
SEM 6.0 should work with Netweaver 2004s (BW 7.0)
Now I have the situation that software component SEM 4.0 is installed in BW 3.5, and SEM 6.0 is integrated in ECC 6.0 because it is part of Netweaver 2004s.
Does anyone know if the upgrade to ECC 6.0 has influence to the connection between BW 3.5 and SEM 4.0??
Tnx for your help!
G.

>
Markus Taxacher wrote:
>Is the only possible way to migrate the BW 3.5 to ERP/ECC 6.0?
> Whats the easiest way for upgrading to 6.0?
>
> Best regards,
> Markus
Hi, you cannot use BW3.5 you must have BI7 (not ECC6!) to install BCS 6 - BCS sits on BI (formerly known as BW).
It doesn't matter what version of source system you have, you can still collect data from ERP 4.6, you don't necessarily need ECC6.

RFC connection BI and ECC 6.0

Hi
I am trying to connect BI and ECC 6.0 at home on two different virtual machines for data extraction and practicing delta management ( they are on the same virtual network).
I am following these steps :
Step-by-step procedure to connect BI with ECCu2026
Define the logical system in R/3 using the transaction code SALE in both the systems (ECC and BI)
Assign Logical System to a client using transaction code SCC4 in both the systems (ECC and BI)
Setup the RFC Destination using transaction code SM59 in both the systems (ECC and BI)
Hit Transaction BD64 and Click Create model view - Enter the Short text u2013 Enter the Technical name u2013 Hit Execute - Distribution Model will be created and the technical name of the distribution model will be listed
Place the cursor on model created and and click Add message type button on the top right corner
Enter sender and receiver system IDs and select the correct message type assigned to the correct system
Distribute this model using Edit u2013 Model View u2013 Distribute
Select the receiver of the model view and proceed to distribute the model
Please note that the distribution of data model is not required to repeat in BI system as this step automatically replicates settings in BI
You have to generate partner profile for each system with which your system communicate using BD82
Outbound records are created in the partner profile for each outgoing message and inbound records are created for each incoming messages
You can view the partner profiles generated using the transaction code WE20
Message Types:
RSRQST: This message type is send by BI to R/3 while loading any data. This gives information about the data source, selection condition and other BI settings to R/3. As and when a load is started in BI, RSRQST message type is sent to R/3 requesting for data.
RSINFO: Once R/3 receives RSRQST message from BI, it sends an acknowledgment message type to BI informing about the status of the request. That is whether the request can be handled or not by R/3. It also gives information about how many data packages are being send and what is the total number of records extracted for the given data source and selection.
RSSEND: After sending a positive acknowledgement to BI, R/3 starts the extraction job and starts collecting data in data IDocs. This message type carries the actual data with it into the BI system.
My question is that : Do i know need to create three model views for these three message types?? Are these steps sufficient?
Please let me know if some other things needs to be followed or U know more simpler way to RFC connect so that I can pull data from ECC into BI and practice delta management.
Thanks
Edited by: max.sap on Apr 28, 2011 8:24 AM

Hi Niru,
Have you created a
[RFC destination in NW Administrator?|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce10/helpdata/en/5a/97a066223e440b8ead3da027b17d9e/frameset.htm]. Have you created a [BI System connection?|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwce10/helpdata/en/7e/6dbcea3700452195e3bddaa47c5906/frameset.htm]
Best regards,
Dharmi

Connectivity between SAP ECC system and SAP BI

Connectivity between SAP ECC system and SAP BI
Hi BI-experts!
I would like to load e.g. transaction data from SAP ECC system into SAP BI system.
The Loading process is hanging in processing step u201CSERVICE APIu201D.
The process in hanging in status "yellow" and then changed after a while to status u201Credu201D.
[0FI_AR_4 |http://www.file-upload.net/view-1447743/0FI_AR_4.jpg.html ]
The following steps within Load process are yellow and then red:
Extraction (messages): Missing messages
Missing message: Request received
Missing message: Number of sent records
Missing message: Selection completed
Transfer (IDocs and TRFC): Missing messages or warnings
Request IDoc : Application document posted (is green)
Data Package 1 : arrived in BW ; Processing : 2nd processing step not yet finished
Info IDoc 1 : sent, not arrived ; Data passed to port OK
Info IDoc 2 : sent, not arrived ; Data passed to port OK
Info IDoc 3 : sent, not arrived ; Data passed to port OK
Info IDoc 4 : sent, not arrived ; Data passed to port OK
Subseq. processing (messages) : Missing messages
Missing message: Subseq. processing completed
DataStore Activation (Change Log) : not yet activated
Question:
Can some one tell me whether my distribution model or other settings are wrong?
I created 2 distribution model (BD64), one from SAP BW system and other from SAP BI system with message types RSRQST, RSINFO, RSSEND
Thank you very much!

Hi Holger.
this issue is related to the RFC but not the one which is communicating from BI to R/3 rather the one which is communicating from R/3 to BI follow these steps.
1. check your BI system logical name from the myself source system.
2. go the ECC and run the transaction sm59
3. go the ABAP Connection folder and search for your RFC which name would be by default as per your BI logical system name.
4. double click it and edit it now check whether the Target hostname or ip is OK.
5. In the logon tab check the client number User and password settings.
Save it and test it with both Connection Test and Remote Logon.
if every thing work fine i hope your problem will be solved.
kind regards,
Zeeshan

Connection between Crystal Report and SAP ECC

Hi. can you help me please.
I'm testing the connection between Crystal Report and SAP ECC. I tried using the tables,
but by making the links between foreign keys does not bring data. The other way I tried was using an ABAP function module,
but using this way, Crystal will only works like a Presentation Layer because all the work was did it in ABAP;
besides that shows the limitation that I can not pass as input a table.
what is the best practice for reporting on SAP ECC using Crystal Report?
Thanks.

Hi,
Crystal Reports is able to leverage tables, ABAP functions, SAP query and InfoSets.
what is the issue when using the tables ?
ingo

ChaRM configurtn-No network connectivity in between DEV-QA1 to QA2 and PRD

hi Experts,
We are planning to implement solution manager for CHaRM configuration.
Our Landscape is something like this...
ECD(DEV)->EC1(QA1) and
EA2(QA2)->EAP(PRD)
we are not having any network connectivity in between DEV-QA1 to QA2 and PRD. DEV and QA1 are in one network and QA2 and PRD are on other network.
DEV and QA1 are connected and QA2 and PRD are connected.
Now we need to implement ChaRM from Dev to PRD, so please suggest me how to implemet this. Whether this is possible or not? what different settings we have to do from standards.
It would be very great if you suggest us on this.
thanks
narpal

Hi Raghu,
we are moving the files (Co files and Data File) manually from QA1 to QA2.
We are runnning one batch proggram that moves the co file data file from QA1/DEV to one spefifyed folder/server/device.
And then from this device/folder to QA2 we are moveing manually.
Now same way whether we can move the files in case of ChaRM configuration? Please suggest?
thanks
Narpal

Connection string in dev and production

I have a several servers that i want to pull data from.
I put the connection string in a OBJECT variable that come from configuration table and use it in the for loop mapping the value to local variable called connectionstring, this variable is the expression for the connection string property.
So far everything is working as expected.
my problem is that on my development i put my local server in the connection string variable so i will be able to connect to the server so i will be able to map source to destination.
When i deploy the solution to production the data in the configuration table is different obviously but i get a connection error that saying that it try to connect to my dev server.
Any idea why?
Thanks.

Seems like you haven't configured your package properly
Here are some important consideration for SQL Server Configuration
Now, let’s go through some important considerations that will help you to understand this configuration type better, and to avoid common implementation issues:
SQL Server configurations are very flexible, as you can store multiple configuration properties/values in the same table.
Multiple packages can use the same configuration table and filter.
You can have a configuration filter for each entry in the configuration table, or you can use the same filter to group a set of entries. If you use the second approach, make sure that all properties under the selected filter exist in the package
being configured. Otherwise warning messages are generated for those properties in the configuration filter that do not exist in the target package.
You can use existing database security and backup policies to protect the configuration table contents.
A drawback of this configuration type is that it relies on an SSIS connection manager to get access to the configuration table, but does not have built-in support for updating its connection string. In other words, the connection string that points
to the configuration table is hard-coded inside of the package, and you have to take extra steps in order to update it (for example, through an extra package configuration placed at the top of the Package Configurations Organizer, or in SQL Server 2008, by
using the /CONN option of DTExec).
The /CONN option of DTExec utility can be used to override the connection string used by the configuration only in SSIS 2008. This is because SQL Server 2008 Integration Services reloads configurations after applying DTExec command line options.
The configuration wizard can create the table and insert the required rows when they do not exist, but only if the direct method is chosen. The wizard never includes any sensitive data in the ConfiguredValue column of the table, and you would need
to manually update the table to add the required sensitive data.
If you use the direct method, and provide an existing configuration filter, the wizard will prompt you to either reuse the configuration information in the table or to override it with the property values from the current package. Make sure that
you understand this behavior, since choosing the wrong option could change the contents of the configuration table and produce unexpected execution results.
When you use the indirect method, the environment variable must contain the name of the configuration connection manager, the name of the configuration table and the configuration filter. The syntax should be:
“ConfigurationManagerName”;”Schema.ConfigurationTableName”;’ConfigurationFilter”
As with the direct method, you have to account for extra logic if you need to modify the connection string inside of “ConfigurationManagerName”

SAP RAR - Best Practice ECC,CRM and BW systems

Hi All
i have the requirement to configure RAR for the systems ECC,CRM and BW systems . Each system has only one client . whats the best practice regarding using the rules against each system . i am assuming the rules will be the same irrespective of the system but when i see the names of the initial files , they are system specific . can anybody elloborate around this . thanks
Regards
Prasad

Prasad,
To build on Chinmaya's explanation, make sure you use a logical system for CRM, BI, and ECC for the basis portion of the rule set (and only the basis portion). This will keep you from duplicating your rules to meet your basis requirements. The other rules should be attributed to the individual systems (or additional logical systems if including mult landscapes, ex. Dev, QA, and Prod ECC merged into one ECC logical system).

Org Structre in SRM and ECC not in synch

Hi Friends
System :SRM 7.0 Extended Classic scenario.
Scenario: We never copied our Dev Client fro Production. Recently our Dev ECC system has been copied from Production
But ,because of memory constraints we cannot do the same to SRM system.
Also our Org is replicated from ECC to SRM.
Objective: 1 Need to synch up the Org of ECC (Dev) to SRM(Dev)
Query 1: How do we overwrite the entire org setup of SRM .
Query2 : Can we make use of concept of Plan version here so that we end up doing wrong ,so that we could switch back to
the earlier version)
(Any inputs on how can we make this possible)
Query 3: Is it possible to transport only the Org structure from either Production (SRM) or Develepoment (ECC).
While doing all this we have a major issue
Issue1: We could figure out that the number ranges setup in our Dev org structure of SRM are totally differnt from ECC Dev.
Ex: Postion number are 65XXXXXX in ECC where as 60XXXXXXX in SRM.
So when we perform PFAL ,it fails .
Any kind of inputs for us to brainstorm on this.
Regards
Sarath

Hi Sarath,
If we are using active version then change the number ranges in OONR against 01$$
Check the IDOC settings for message type HRMD_ABA. it must be transafer IDOC immediately.
Get the all active organization unit (O) from HRP1001 table in SAP and run PFAL in update mode for object (O) and let me know the result. It will replicate all orgnaization unit and position which fas assigned to above
Regards
Dayal

XI Dev. connected to ECC Dev and ECC Qas

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for