XI Implementation Solution for Manifacturing Domain

Hi Experts,
I am going to work PI Implementation for Manufacturing Domain Project,
I dont have any idea about Manufacture Domain, my prior XI Implementation experience not belong to manufacture domain.
Please share some helpful doc's about XI Implementation stratagies and some useful tips about manufacture Domain.
Thanks
Raj

hi Also check This Pdf & Thread
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/704357d9-ce6e-2910-f085-bb1a238b6330
Murli's querry is same
Re: Regarding XI Implementation
Regards
Abhishek

Similar Messages

Does any one implemented solution for httpservlet request/response object in IWSDLInterceptor implemented class?

I am trying to handle Producer not available situation in which I am using Interceptor IWSDLInterceptor in WLP 10.3.4. I am able to retrieve exception using onWSDLException but from here if I have to forward my pageURL object I need httpservlet request and response. I tried my own filter class to have its own customize request and also tried it out all other Interceptor to see if any one can handle IOException. I did manage to throw my own Customize exception but that also did not work out as Page does not have any backing file or any supportive Controller class.
Does any one implemented solution for httpservlet request/response object in IWSDLInterceptor implemented class? or do we have any specific documentation in regards to this? As I am not able to find much martial on IWSDLInterceptor except Java API from Oracle and article defining Two way SSL handshake Producer.
Any kind of help is appreciated.
Thanks
PT

Thanks Emmanuel for your response but render behavior is not available for IWSDLRequestContext/IWDSLResponseContext object which IWSDLInterceptor uses for implementation.
Let me put my question in little simpler manner. May be my approach to the problem is not proper.
Problem : Handle Producer Not available (no application exists on server) on consumer side.
So far tried approach : Producer is not running then I am able to handle that TransportException at IInitCookieInterceptor/IHandleEventInterceptor onFault behaviour but in the case of Producer not even exists Consumer try to get WSDL fetch operation and failed with FileNotFoundException.
To handle this exception, I used IWSDLInterceptor which is available under IWSDLInterceptor.OnWSDLException (Oracle Fusion Middleware Java API for Oracle WebLogic Portal)
I am able to catch the exception but problem arise when application needs to forward at specific page/render portlet for this situation. For that it required request/response object but IWSDLInterceptor does not give any kind of instances to redirect request as there is no direct access to HTTPServlet request/response object.
I tried my custom request object to use there. I tried out custom filter object of IWSDLrequestContext. nothing works.
One approach works is to put producer WSDL file at consumer level. But in that, you need to handle different producer files for different environment. Which I don't think its a good approach.
eAny one Let me know if my approach to the problem/scenario is wrong. Or if I am missing out any other supporting interface which also required to handle this scenario. or I am using wrong interface for this scenario.
Thanks for your help in advance.
PT.

Groupware solution for cross domains

Hello all,
Does anyone know if groupware solution is supported for if groupware servers ( in our case lotus Domino Servers ) are located in 2 different domains.
Our landscape is like this..
1 connector , default proxy instance , CRM Server and 1 Lotus Server on 1 domain and the 2nd Lotus server is on a different domain...Directory assistance is setup////
Wanted to know if Groupwaer solution is supported for such a landscape?
Thanks.
Regards,
Pratima

I have come across information where groupware has worked across different domains.
If anyone has worked on cross domains...it would be great if you can share what u have done..
In our case, if the groupware server is in a different domain, userlist is not getting generated with an error "user does not exist in the groupware domain" even though it does exist ...works fine for users in the same domain as the connector and CRM.
In the transaction SCOT, we have configured the the MailHost = 'abcsmtp' and the MailPort = '25'...
Regards,
Pratima
Edited by: pratima purigali on Apr 14, 2010 8:31 AM

Implementing Security for BPEL Process

Hi,
We have a requirement to add security layer to BPEL processes (BPEL 10.1.3.4) deployed on WL 9.2. Client has asked us to implement PKI for WL domain.
Please guide me regarding the same.
Regards,
Prabodh Mitra
P.S. we are not using OWSM due to some business reasons

Hi,
Can you please provide any docs related to implementing pki/ssl in a BPEL-WLS env ? I have tried, but in vain.
These are the questions I have,
1. BPEL is installed on a separate domain in WLS. How will we enable SSL here? Is it ok if we enable at admin server level ?
2. Do we need to do some configuration on BPEL side as we do in OAS setup?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
AP

We need to implement EP Solution for Supplier Portal

Hello All,
I'm working on BSP's and Portal since 1 Year.
The Portal Implementation is already done before I started working on it.
Now my scenario is as folows :
We need to implement EP Solution for Supplier Portal .
For this we want to know what are all the activities involved.
Can anyone throw some light on it ?
Regards,
Deepu.K

We have to make setting for displaying all the roles defined for supplier portal to reflect in the EP.Portal is integrated with Webclient of CRM so make sure all changes done in the webclient are reflected in the Portal thing.

Mailman v3 implementation of support for multiple domains

Mailman has evolved to support listserve names for multiple domains (think VH for listserves). At what point can we see Apple roll this kind of management into the existing product? It would be fabulous to give VH clients the ability to have their own 'branded' listserve experience rather than one with our default domains
Server Group -- please update Mailman when more pressing bug fixes are out of your way. Thank you!

Alex,
Thanks. I know that it can be done via the CLI, but once again we see where alterations done in the CLI will immediately require abandoning the SA as an admin tool. We're trying to encourage Apple to not create this paradox, or rather, to evolve the GUI admin toolset. I was recently at a Leopard Server tour seminar where the field engineer and I discussed this very feature. His comment to me was essentially 'many of the tools in the Server are based on open source projects, so you can simply download the latest update, compile it and configure it for the server ... but you won't be able to use the admin tools we provide." He's accurate, and if I was the only one admin'ing my machines, that might be a temporary solution to this particular small issue. But it immediately brings to mind the reflex question of 'so why did I buy Leopard server?
This is a matter of Apple needing to provide sufficient resources to the Server group to grow the product. Whether that means some new hiring, or not pulling engineers off for other product lines, or a different management paradigm. We shouldn't purchase a server product that is touted as an enterprise-class solution when it may only have a bare framework for the offered toolsets. If growing the toolset to match what is already offered in the open source world (for that particular product) requires abandoning the server tools, then there's a bit of a vision problem with the Server product.
Sorry, -- I didn't mean to get on a soap box. You and I are here to learn and help others. I know you aren't part of Apple any more than I am. I do hope Apple engineers are given some time to peruse this board and mine it for ideas, or gauge the effectiveness of their solutions based on the questions and solutions posed here.
With Mailman 3 so far along in development (VH support was added in October), is Apple culling the very best from it for their user base (and adjusting the SA toolset accordingly)?

Is there a solution for Higher Ed Computer Labs?

I am an instructional Technician for the Photography Department at a Community College. We currently purchase and use the Creative Suite 6 Design & Web Premium here in the Photography, Graphics and Journalism departments. We have over 150 Macintosh computers licensed with your product and we are very interested in the Creative Cloud.
Currently we purchase the licenses for all of our student and faculty computers, we are hoping that you will be developing an education solution for computer labs like ours.
What we would like to see is an arrangement that would allow our students to subscribe to the Creative Cloud for a three-month period that would be paid for prior to the first day of classes. This would avoid classroom disruptions from students failing to pay if the subscription was on a month-to-month basis.
While I understand that the current Student and Teacher edition at $19.95 is a limited promotion, a price of $20–$25 per month or $75 for a three-month period would be less than the cost of a textbook and could be easily charged as a class fee.
A potential problem is that students sometimes do not use the same computer all the time. If students are taking multiple classes in different labs, they need to be able to access the programs on several computers. I am currently subscribed to the free trial month and my impression is that the subscription is dependent on logging in with an Adobe ID. If this is the case, students should be able to use this log in to access the software they need on whatever computer they are at as long as they have an active (paid) login, and are not logged in on another computer.
As it is everywhere in education, our program budgets are tight. The Creative Cloud would allow us to save a significant amount of funds while still offering the most current technology to our students and faculty. The ability to access any software we need and allowing students the ability to access the programs at school and at home will empower both our faculty and students. Additionally, the availability of cloud storage will allow students to work on files at home and at school seamlessly.
I am making several assumptions:
Pricing –
Student and faculty pricing will be available.
A price will be established for a three-month period to facilitate a college semester.
Access –
Students will be able to access the programs on more than one lab computer.
Is access controlled by logging in with an Adobe ID?
Once the software has been installed on a computer, will any student with an Adobe ID be able to access it?
We are hoping to be able to implement this by next fall, so I am anticipating that these details will be worked out before then.

Great to know this I will be sharing it with my professors also. To have the "team" version would be great! Many problems occur for students with portable storage units. The worst is forgetting to download a project and take it with you. which really hurts our timing on a project to completion. Also as the projects grow in size we can end up with storage issues as some files are very large. This sounds like a grand solution.
Thank you for answering my question earlier Mr. Rice. Now I need to get back to my assignments. bye.

How can I set up SSL login authentication on one domain for multiple domains

Our site currently runs in 22 countries with 22 different
country domains:
www.mysite.com
www.mysite.co.uk
www.mysite.fr
etc
We want to use SSL on our login pages but realise that the
cost of certification for every domain is expensive. One solution
would be to channel all login activity to a single domain, eg:
www.mysite.com/login.cfm?site=fr which would then redirect to
www.mysite.fr – this is how Google do it
But, currently we are using encrypted cookies for login
authentication so we would have the problem of having to transfer
the cookie info across domains securely. Is there any way of going
about this?
Any other suggestions would be great, too. We do plan to move
to session management for logins but this is a longer term project
so we are hoping to sort out the SSL prior to that.

Can you not pass the values you need as URL parameters?
Encrypt them befor you send them and then decrypt them on the new
domain. Then add them to whatever place you need (cookie, session,
etc.)?

Mouse over solution for jdk1.0

hi all,
I am interested in making the equivalent of a mouse over solution for a java applet.
Basically I'll have approximately 100 Rectangle objects representing images on the applet.
When the person moves the mouse over these 100 rectangle objects, i'll use contains() method to determine if the mouse is over the object in question.
If true, the image will be changed to represent the mouse over event .
I thought for a msecond about looping through all the rectangle objects each time the mouse moves. but that seemed impractical since the mouse can move pretty quickly.
It seemed to me the best option was to extend the Rectangle object and put an event listener on it . so that the Rectangle object can be triggered at the same time or individually as needed in response to the mousemove event .
Does anyone have any thoughts about that ?
does anyone know how I would possible implement something like that for java 1.0
thanks
stev

it seems like I have to extend Component some how to get access to enableEvents method.
Here is my class
class ListeningRectangle extends Rectangle{
     public ListeningRectangle(int w, int x, int y, int z, Component c){
          super(w,x,y,z);
          c.enableEvents(AWTEvent.MOUSE_MOTION_EVENT_MASK);
     public void mouseMoved (MouseEvent me) {
     System.out.println("event has been received by rectangle");
I am using this class in conjunction with a java applet (targetted to 1.0-1.1 ).
I'm passing a reference of the applet in to create this ListeningRectangle like this
new ListeningRectangle(a,b,c,d,this);
my objective is to have about 100 different rectangle areas defined on the java applet.
and when the person moves the moves the mouse of the applet rapidly, only the appropriate ListeningRectangle object would respond.
any ideas on how to get this done ? ?
The full code is below
stephen
================================
full source code below
import java.applet.*;
import java.io.*;
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
public class TestEventHandler extends Applet implements Runnable{
     ///variables
     public static Color bgColor = Color.blue.darker();
     private Thread thread;
     public Graphics offGfx;
     private Image offImg;
     private Image basicOffImg;
     public static int xlen;
     public static int ylen;
public ListeningRectangle lr;
     ///methods
     public void init(){
     xlen = size().width;
     ylen = size().height;
     basicOffImg = createImage(xlen, ylen);
     offImg = basicOffImg;
     offGfx = offImg.getGraphics();
     setBackground(bgColor);
     offGfx.setColor(bgColor);
     offGfx.fillRect(0, 0, xlen, ylen);
     offGfx.setFont(new Font("Arial, Helvetica, Helv", 1, 15));
     FontMetrics fontmetrics = offGfx.getFontMetrics();
     offGfx.setColor(Color.white);
     String s = "pleaseWait";
     offGfx.drawString(s, xlen / 2 - fontmetrics.stringWidth(s) / 2, ylen / 2);
          lr = new ListeningRectangle(20,20,50,50,this);
          offGfx.fillRect(20,20,50,50);
     public void start(){
     if(thread == null)
          thread = new Thread(this);
          thread.start();
     public void run(){
          while(thread != null){
     try
          Thread.sleep(100L);
          catch(InterruptedException _ex) { }
     public void stop()
          if(thread!=null)
     thread = null;
     public void update(Graphics g){ paint(g);}
     public void paint(Graphics g){
     g.drawImage(offImg, 0, 0, null);
public boolean mouseDrag(Event event, int i, int j)
if(true)
return false;//means ripple
} else
return true;//means do not ripple for jvm1.0
public boolean mouseMove(Event event, int i, int j)
if(true)
return false;
} else
return false;
class ListeningRectangle extends Rectangle{
     public ListeningRectangle(int w, int x, int y, int z, Applet c){
          super(w,x,y,z);
          c.enableEvents(AWTEvent.MOUSE_MOTION_EVENT_MASK);
     public void mouseMoved (MouseEvent me) {
     System.out.println("event has been received by rectangle");
}//end of class

Make your own Fax Server with Automator! (Pagesender solution for Mavericks)

I have been scouring these discussion boards for some time now looking for a suitable substitute to PageSender, an awesome fax solution for the Mac from SmileOnMyMac LLC, which for some inexplicable reason stopped development and updates after OS 10.6.8. The result is that many small business office users who still rely on fax (and yes...no matter what they tell you, most of the business world DOES still use fax because it's legally binding and more secure than email for the transmission of legal documents or healthcare records, and does not rely on database integration accross different systems, which is sadly but very realistically still a long ways off), and no longer have a way to integrate faxes into a paperless or digital workflow office system.
I suspect like many folks who receive faxes, those who used PageSender, used a very powerful feature to forward faxes by email, thereby turning your Mac into a Fax server that could distribute your faxes to other workstations and staff throughout the business via email. Presumably, if you have your own email server (Exchange, Kerio, AppleMail server, PostFix enabler etc.) you could distribute faxes on your own internal network, securely behind a firewall, and effectively create a digitial/paperless workflow for your faxes.
Even if you have a USB modem or multifunction printer that allows you to recieve a Fax to your desktop (Apple's internal fax via printer preferences, and some HP models like the HP MFP 127fw) for example will allow you to recieve a Fax to a desktop folder or forward to a single email address. But the former is of limited functionaliy and the later only lets you send to an email address out over the internet with a registered public domain, which means you give up all control of privacy and means you can't process it through a private mail server to create a digital workflow for your office...
...Until now!!!
I am happy to report that I have finally discovered a very easy and useable feature that will save a lot of time, money, and headaches for those looking to create a digital workflow and fax server system for a small office system. (I don't think there is any limit to scale here, but I suspect offices with more than 10 employees probably have a BizHub, or HP MFP/digital sender that can create the same process directly from the printer, but of course these come with a price tag of $2000 and up...).
To accomplish this however, you will need some basic requirements which are as follows:
1) A USB modem from either US Robotics or Zoom Modem. These are readily available from Amazon, MacMall or any number of other online vendors and work very well and seemlessly with all Macs running OSX right up through Mavericks
OR
A Multifunction printer that is capable of receiving faxes to a desktop Mac like the HP 127 fw. Other models exist from other manufacturers as well, but you will have to do a bit of research and probably check with the vendor or user manual directly to confirm that Fax to desktop is supported for Mac and OS 10.9.
2) A dedicated Mail Server (MSFT Exchange, Kerio, MacOSX server with mail server enabled, or PostFix enalber or MailServe from Cutedge Systems)
You will need to set up an email account on your server that is the parent for all incoming faxes from which the faxes will be sent out as part of your digital workflow. This is beyond the scope of this discussion but if you've come this far and you're still reading, you probably know how to do this already. I recommend setting this up as a POP account, not IMAP. This way, the attatchments (your faxes) will always remain on your server as a back up, until you delete them from the server.
3) Now simply go to System preferences and select "Printers and Scanners". Select either the Fax printer for your multifunction printer, or add a fax printer/reviever using the + button and select "Fax" if you are using a USB modem. You must have the USB modem attatched to the computer in order to use the built-in Apple Fax feature for the latter option.
4) Now click on the receive options. Select "Recieve faxes to this computer" and set your ring answer settings. Check "Save to" and select the designated folder (either Faxes or Shared Faxes on your computer) or create a new folder. Depending on the volume of faxes, and your back up systems, you may want to designate a separate folder on a separate drive, exclusively for your Faxes. This is where all your faxes will be stored.
5) Now launch "Automator" in your applications folder and create a new workflow. You will be presented with several options. Select "Folder Action".
6) At the top right of the window space you will see "Folder Action receives files and folders added to" . Select the Fax folder you created in step 4.
7)On the left hand side of the "Actions" menu select "Mail"
8) From the list of actions select "New Mail Message" this will take the latest Fax added to your Fax folder and attach it as a PDF to a new outgoing mail. In the "TO" address put the email address that belongs to the parent account your created for the Faxes on your mail server eg. [email protected]. In the subject field you can put "Fax Workflow" or any other generic subject that will identify to all reciptients that this is an email that contains a Fax/PDF attatchment.
Under "account" use the SMTP account you set up on your mail server to handle the routing of internal emails. In most cases, this will be the same as the parent account created above. (Effectively, this account is sending and receiving emails to itself).
9) From the list of actions, select "Send outgoing messages".
10) Save the Automator workflow with a name like "FaxDistribution" or "FaxFlow".
11) Go back to the Fax folder you created in step 4. Right click or option click on the folder and scroll down the options menu and select "Folder Actions Setup". You will see a list of scripts including the Automator workflow you just created. Choose it.
That's it!! From now on, when you get a fax, it will get dumped into the designated fax folder, and this will automatically trigger the workflow to atttach and send it as an email to anyone in your office that is set up to receive emails with the "faxserver" address. You now have a paperless fax digital workflow server system for distributing your faxes digitally to anyone in your office who needs to review your faxes. Good luck!

Thank you for this interesting posting.

Can't setup scan to email with google apps for your domain (HP Officejet Pro 8500 A910 Printer)

Printer HP Officejet Pro 8500 A910
Web interface (HPLIP installed on ubuntu 11.10, but problem is linked to web config.)
"The device could not send the test e-mail message. (EmailAccounts-timeout)" when going through the full setup, and "The device could not send the test e-mail message." when testing the account after creating it from the "Outgoing Email Profiles" tab.
No changes.
I can't cofigure the printer to send emails out using the email adress we have created exclusively for it with our domain name in Google Apps for your domain. The settings test ok for the email alerts.
I'm using these settings:
Server: smtp.google.com
Port: 587 (also tried 465)
username: [email protected]
good password, copied and pasted to make sure there are no typo's.

Welcome to the forums Joanda!
I saw your post about the issues you are having with scanning and would like to help!
Please let me know which model of printer you have:
HP Officejet Pro 8500A e-All-in-One Printer - A910a
HP Officejet Pro 8500A Plus e-All-in-One Printer - A910g
HP Officejet Pro 8500A Premium e-All-in-One Printer - A910n
Also let me know which operating system you are running on your computer.
Thank you!
R a i n b o w 7000I work on behalf of HP
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" at the bottom of this post to say
“Thanks” for helping!
Click “Accept as Solution” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution!

SQL Server 2012 - Wat Is The Best Solution For Creating a Read Only Replicated/AlwaysOn Database

Hi there I was wondering if someone may have a best recommendation for the following requirement I have with regards setting up a third database server for reporting?
Current Setup
SQL Server 2012 Enterprise setup at two sites (Site A & Site B).
Configured to use AlwaysOn Availability groups for HA and DR.
Installed on Windows 2012 Servers.
This is all working and failover works fine and no issues. So…
Requirement
A third server needs to be added for the purpose of reporting, to be located on another site (Site C) possibly in another domain. This server needs to have a replicated read only copy of the live database from site A or Site B, whichever is in use. The Site
C reporting database should be as up-to-date to the Site A or Site B database as possible – preferably within a few seconds anyway….
Solution - What I believe are available to me
I believe I can use AlwaysOn and create a ReadOnly replica for the Site C. If so do I assume Site C needs to have the Enterprise version of SQL server i.e. to match Site A & Site B?
Using log shipping which if I am correct means the Site C does not need to be an Enterprise version.
Any help on the best solution for this would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Steve

for always on - all nodes should be part of one windows cluster..if there site C is on different domain - I do not think it works.
Logshipping works --as long as the sql on site C is is same or higher version(sql 2012 or above). you can only do read only.
IMHo, if you can make site C in the same domain then, Always is better solution else log shipping
also, if your database has enterprise level features such as - partitonin, data compression -- you cannot restore the database on lower editions- so you need to have enterprise edition.
Hope it Helps!!

Cannot connect to SERVER. Login failed for user 'DOMAIN\user'. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error 18456) - SQL Server 2012 on Windows Server 2008 R2

I've seen multiple blogs and forums with similar problems and SQL 2012 or 2008. But no solutions that work for me.
I have installed SQL Server in mixed mode (SQL and Windows authentication). I can create new Login accounts in either mode. However, I cannot get an AD security group Login account to work. I am trying to add group 'DOMAIN\Domain Admins' or 'SERVER\Administrators'
as a Login so that any of the domain's administrator accounts can open SQL Server Management Studio and act as an 'sa' account on this server.
I have deleted the SQL account 'DOMAIN\Domain Admins'.
I have restarted SQL.
I have restarted the Win2K8r2 server.
I have launched SSMS as Administrator from the desktop of SERVER.
I have launched SSMS as another user (and used 'DOMAIN\user' to lauch it) from the desktop of SERVER.
I can create a login account named 'DOMAIN\user' (who happens to be a member of the 'DOMAIN\Domain Admins' group) and give this account 'sa' security, and when I do that, this account works as expected...
How do I add a security group as a Login account and give all members of that group the ability to be an 'sa' account?

Hi geoperkins,
Are you getting the following error message?
Error: 18456, Severity: 14, State: 11
Login failed for user <Domain\user>. Reason: Token-based server access validation failed with an infrastructure error.
If that is the case, the issue could be due to that the Windows login has no profile or that permissions could not be checked due to UAC. Please disable UAC firstly and check if it is successful to log in SQL Server.
Another reason could be that the domain controller could not be reached. You may need to resort to re-creating the login. Create a new group in AD, add users to the new group, then add the group to the local admin group and create login for the group in SQL
Server.
There is a connect item describing similar issue for your reference.
https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/680705/cant-login-to-sql-using-windows-authentication-when-user-is-in-a-domain-security-group
For more details about above error, please review the following blog.
http://sqlblogcasts.com/blogs/simons/archive/2011/02/01/solution-login-failed-for-user-x-reason-token-based-server-access-validation-failed-and-error-18456.aspx
Thanks,
Lydia Zhang
Lydia Zhang
TechNet Community Support

Single server solution for RDS / TS / RDP using Windows Server 2012 R2

Planning on setting up a small single server and need this functionality:
* 3 local users runnnig Windows 7 Home Premium needs to access files on the server
* The same 3 users should also be able to connect from home (PC, Mac, iPhone) and run an application on the server. (Session-Based Remote Desktop).
We want to use Windows Server 2012, and found out that Essentials does not support RDP, so that leaves Foundation and Standard versions.
However, I also found out that in WS 2012 the RDP can not be on the same server as the Domain Controller, and we therefor needs to run 2 server instances on our hardware. I think this starts to look way to complicated for what we want to do, but found out
that WS 2012 R2 allows a single server to run RDP (See TechNet article 2833839).
So we will go for Windows Server 2012 R2, either Foundation or Standard to set up our RDP.
So now the question: Will that solution work with our local machines running Windows 7 Home Premium, as they cannot connect to a domain? Can we set up some kind of simple file share or Workgroup to acces files locally while still keeping the RDP
functionality on the server?
And, will WS 2012 Foundation R2 do this as well as WS 2012 Standard R2?
(I have been asking several locat MS representatives to find a solution to our needs, but no one seems to know how this works....of cause we could just get 2 WS 2012 Standard server instances, run one as DC and on as RDCB and upgrade all our clients to Win
7 Pro, but we would like a solution with minimal investment in time and money)
Rgds
Petter

Hi Ryan,
and thanks for the answer! I do not know how to do "multiple quote" in this forum so I do it this way:
"have you considered virtualisation, as you can run multiple virtual machines under one licence. I think this would be the cheapest and most efficient use of your money. Upgrading your clients to Windows 7 pro would allow you to have domain control
Single Sign On SSO. "
This is the "official" solution I think: Upgrade all clients to Win 7 Pro and run two instances of Win Server 2012 Standard on the server.
However, I was hoping to get away with something a bit more Quick & Dirty.....;-) We do not have big security issues and will have a good backup system, and I think for 3 users only, it will be more work trying to centralise administration like updating,
backups etc, than to just go to each machine and do what is needed.
We are good with computers/Windows but have no Server experience. A server guy will help us get started, but I dont want him around after that, so it must be a very simple solution.
Also, installing 2 instances of WS 2012 and upgrading all 3 clients to Win Pro, and then installing all software and settings on the clients into the new domain user accounts on these clients is quite a lot of work. So I was hoping to keep only existing local
users on the client machines and only have some kind of file share thing going on with the server disks that we need to access. So perhaps use a Workgroup instead of a domain, if that works with the RDS setup?
"Option 1
2 virtual machines 1x DC and 1x RDS server."
So, if we set up RDS this way (so we can log in remote and run our application session-based on the server), can we keep the local clients running Windows Home Premium using our current local user logins (ie no domain user accounts created on the client machines,
as this is impossible in Home versions) and still access the server disks somehow, or is it impossible?
Another question is if it is stupid/a really bad solution...but I still want to know if it is possible....;-)
"Option 2
2 virtual machines 1x DC and 1x RDS server.
You can configure your RDS solution as a domain joined platform and will still be able to access resources from the local device as you can map local drives to the session host. http://www.serverintellect.com/support/techfaq/drive-rdp/
Your users would have two sets of credentials, one for the local client and one for the domain."
I do not want to access files over VPN or RDP, we only want to run an application on the server from remote (Session-Based Remote Desktop). However when we use the local clients we want to access files on the server, and then we access huge image and film files
on fast RAID drives, so local network speed must be top speed. Also if possible we would like to not upgrade to Win Pro, and then joining a domain is not possible.
"Option 3
1x Server
The second option would be to manually deploy the session host role and licencing role to a work group server. This would limit access to RDP only and you would loose web access functionality."
I think this is what I was hoping for. It seems that the new R2 release of WS 2012 allows you to rund RDP and Domain Controller roles on the SAME instance of the server. That sounds nice, it limits what we need to keep track on and minimises the load on the
server that needs to act as a very fast file server locally.
However, can we do this and still keep file acces with only Windows Home (no domain) in the local clients (same question as above under "Option 1")?
Rgds
Petter

Solution for printing of Purchasing Documents in SAP with version managemen

Hi experts,
We found that the standard solution does not meet the following requirements for purchasing document
1)     The print for the latest version of the document does not contain items unaffected by change. It requires printing of whole document with all items, but with version number and highlighted changes.
2)     The standard solution cannot highlight some of the changes which are not captured by version management like text changes, target value and Contact (Purchasing Group) in header, text changes at item level, etc.
3)     The standard solution can be used to reprint the whole PO without version management but that cannot highlight the changes specific to the version for which it is printed.
If any solution which can meet the requirements specified above, please let us know <removed by moderator>.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Mar 30, 2011 9:39 AM

Ok.
I have already done with SPRO configuration.
MM->Purchasing->Version management->
It has implemented ECC 6.0. The version management has been activated for Purchasing documents. The standard printing solution for printing of these documents (PO, Outline Agreements and RFQ) print these documents with changes made in the latest version. Any item which is not changed in the latest version does not get printed.

XI Implementation Solution for Manifacturing Domain

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for