Cost Center and Cost Element Hierarchy and Actual Cost Center

In Bex - Right now I am displaying Cost Center and Cost Element hierarchy with 12 months of data. I want to display the actual Cost center number next to cost element hierarchy - Can I display in Bex?
Tried to with Structure creating formula variable for Cost Center using replacement path - didn't work. Can you please suggest me how i can achieve this?
The format should be
CostCenter H1   CostElement H1   CostCenter   Jan  Feb ...
Thanks in advance and appreciate for any help...

Let me explain it clearly and hope it is clear now...
Designed the report as like this - Cost Center Hierarchy by Cost Element Hierarchy for 12 months of data. But Business agian search in R/3 for actual cost center numbers based on above two hierarchy nodes.
I am trying to achieve this Bex instead of going back to R/3 - so that they can understand how the dollar amount is summed up on which major cost centers.
If I remove the hierarchy on Cost Center - it will display all the cost centers. They want to see the Cost center numbers based on CC and CE hierarchy node so that you are displaying only those cost centers. That's the reason I am trying to design the  report with CC Hier, CE hier, Cost Center number and 12 months of data.
In my data model - have only one Cost Center, if i can create another ZCOSTCENTER same as 0COSTCENTER - May be I can achieve this. still looking for options with out changing the design.

Similar Messages

  • I have Windows 7 and PS Elements 10 and can't get the text button to work properly.  What can I do?

    I have Windows 7 and PS Elements 10 and can't get the text button to work properly.  What can I do?

    Try selecting the T tool and then doing a reset (see image below)

  • Have  Canon 7d MK2 and Photoshop Elements 12 and I cannot open my RAW FILES

    I have a CANON 7D MK2 and PHOTOSHOP ELEMENTS 12 and I cant open my RAW files

    The 7D Mark II requires ACR plug-in 8.7 which came out after PSE13 was the current version so you can upgrade or use the DNG Converter 8.7 or newer to create DNGs from the CR2s and those DNGs will work with the older ACR plug-in versions.

  • Im planning on buying PS Lightroom 5, PS Elements 12 and Pr Elements 12 and currently have a MacBook

    Im planning on buying PS Lightroom 5, PS Elements 12 and Pr Elements 12 and currently have a MacBook Pro running Mavericks. Will i have any problems using these programs?

    This is the Premiere PRO forum... you need to ask in the forums for the products you are going to buy
    Photoshop Elements Forum http://forums.adobe.com/community/photoshop_elements
    Premiere Elements Forum http://forums.adobe.com/community/premiere_elements
    Go to http://forums.adobe.com/index.jspa to find a lightroom forum

  • I am using Windows 8.1 and Prem Elements 13 and Elements is not seeing my recordings on a CF Card The camera is a Canon XF 100 recording in Mpeg2

    I am using Windows 8.1 and Prem Elements 13 and Elements is not seeing my recordings on a CF Card The camera is a Canon XF 100 recording in Mpeg2. I have been told it is a codec clash?

    jamesb
    Premiere Elements 13 Windows 8.1 (assumed 64 bit).
    From what I have read, the Canon XF100 uses the MPEG2 Long GOP video compression, however it uses a MXF file extension (container/wrapper format).
    Premiere Elements (any version) does not support MXF files.
    Based on existing information, you would need to convert the MXF file to another format which is supported by Premiere Elements.
    Apparently lots of the MXF converters available online.
    Have you been there and done that?
    ATR

  • Burden Cost shows as Financial Item in Workplan Actual Cost

    We are burdening Cost in Project Manufacturing. When Actual Cost shows in Project Management it is displaying Raw cost as Labor and Burden Cost in Financial Item row as unplanned cost. Any ideas? During the planning it is correct --- Burdened Cost.

    Hi Connell,
    For your first question, you have to set the correct parameters in the file menu, options for the earned value analysis. Select the appropriate Baseline (Baseline 1) and the physical % complete:
    Then you are talking about a chart. What chart is it? Have you first checked the BCWP column in MS Project Pro if you do have values before exporting data? Also have you set the status date? Do you have work resources with a standard rate?
    For your 2nd question, depending on your Project version, you can use the visual report (2007, 2010, 2013) or the report feature (2013) using the cumulative fields (actual cost, Baseline, cost...).
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, P-Seller |

  • Planned cost correct in value category, problem in actual cost after GI

    Hi,
    I have maintained cost elements for value categories for material. The cost comes correctly under value category. After doing good issue of this material. The cost comes in maintenance order actual cost. But it does not appear under value category expected (it should fall in same value category as planned cost). Please suggest on this.
    Regards,
    Vijay

    Hi,
    The value category / cost elements combination is corret & this is the reason why the cost comes in proper value category in planned cost when the material is reserved.
    But when the material is issued, it does not come in same value category under actual cost head.
    I believe there are no different settings for planned cost & actual cost related to value category & cost element.
    In my understanding, if the cost comes in planned cost then it should come in same value category in actual cost.
    Please correct if I am wrong.
    Thanks

  • What is the difference between student version of photoshop elements 13 and premiere elements 13 and the regular version

    what is the difference between photoshop elements 13 and premiere elements 13 student version versus regular

    General overview here
    What’s the Difference Between Adobe Student Editions vs. Regular? | ProDesignTools

  • Can i download and buy elements 11, and still get the cd shipped to me?

    hi there,
    i downloaded the trial version of photoshop 11, it quit after 24 hours...........
    i am happy to buy it though......
    can i download and pay for it, and get a serial...................
    and then tomorrow when the office opens, i can call them to ship me the cd?
    thank you,
    george

    gave up on the trial....
    i ended up buying it at future shop for $119 this evening........... cheaper than buying it online and having it shipped.
    had a bit of an issue when i installed it, it said the provided serial was wrong.........
    i got online with adobe chat....... they are useless........ to the point where i asked for a supervisor... they said no...... i asked for the agents id number, and he said no.....
    anyways, it's a long story..... but i finally ended up getting it working without them.........
    thank you for all the suggestions.. this forum is worth 1000 of those guys on adobe online chat help,
    i wont be going back there again, but ill be back here again,
    thank you
    gh

  • Cost of producion item not related to actual costs of items isued to prod

    I have a scenario where a production order for producing a quantity of one of a specific item has been created and released. The Planned quantity of the unique Item used for production in Components Tab is 10, the  Issue method is Manual
    In Issue for production screen the quantity recorded is 12, 2 more than the planned
    Then the receipt for production has been recorded for 1 item.
    Valuation method for all involved items is Moving Average
    The system behavior expected by myself was the cost of the produced item was the cost of the component multiplied by 12. However the cost the system calculates is the cost of the component multiplied by 10.
    While the Summary of the production order shows Actual Component Cost as multiplied by the Actual Product Cost is just multiplied by 10
    Some ideas here?
    Julio

    Suda,
    Many thanks for your answer. I will try to explain the business scenario and why I think the cost should be different . In my explanation the sequence of actions and people performing actions is relevant.
    1. Product Engineering clerk determines producing parent item will require 10 components and based of that the BOM is created by Product Engineering clerk with 10.
    2. Production planning clerk creates production order based on BOM
    3. Production planning clerk releases the order
    4. Production clerk (the actual performer) requires 5 components to raw material warehouse (nothing recorded in SAP)
    5. Warehouse clerk 1 (at raw material warehouse) gives 5 components to production clerk. Warehouse clerk 1 uses Issue for Production transaction to record 5 components issued to production order
    6. Production clerk identifies that for this specific production order 10 components should not be enough so for finishing the order requires 7 components to raw material warehouse (again, nothing recorded in SAP)
    7. Warehouse clerk 1 gives 7 components to production clerk. Warehouse clerk 1 uses Issue for Production transaction to record 7 components issued to production order
    8. Warehouse clerk 2 (at finish goods warehouse) receives the item produced and uses Receipt from production transaction to record 1 item received
    From 4 to 8 actions the interaction is just between production clerk and warehouse clerks. It is not expected warehouse clerks neither production clerk have access to modify production order details. They just record what they do.
    At the end of the day the reality is that this specific product just produced costed more because more components were used (think the components can be kilograms of a substance or even pieces that can be with some defects just identified at production). And yes, there is a variance between the original order details and the actual components used. All this is shown at Order Summary Tab.
    But if the product is been valued using moving average method why the real components issued to production are not used to calculate the cost of the finished product and rather the "planned" components are been used?
    I have tried the option you mention. To modify directly the order but to issues arise from here.
    a) Every single time some extra components are required the Production planing clerk has to updated the order?
    b) If we do so no variance is reported and no action can be taken to avoid this variance.
    Your thoughts?
    Julio

  • Printing with HP B9180 and Photoshop Elements 8 and Color Management

     I've got a bit of confusion about certain settings in the printing process and I've posted a rather long discussion of my 'issues' and confusion.  I hope someone can give me some guidance here.  I've seen a lot of these issues addressed in many places but I can't seem to find an integrated response.  Thanks to anyone who takes the time to read and respond.
    Color Management Questions
    My problems started when I was getting pictures that were too dark from my HP 9180 printer after having gotten very nice prints for a long time.  I had obviously started to do something differently inadvertently.  The only thing I think that is different is that I got a new 23 inch monitor, which does produce much brighter on-screen images.  So, I started to do some research and know just enough about color management to be slightly confused and have some questions that I hope someone can give me some help with.
    Equipment Background
    I use both a Canon 20D and a Canon PowerShot SD600 camera. Both have the default color space as sRGB, although the 20D can be also set as RGB.
    I also use Photoshop Elements 8, where there are a variety of settings possible for printing.
    My monitor is an HP S2331, whose color space is sRGB and cannot be reset to RGB (I think) except for temperature; the default is 6500K.
    My printer is an HP Photosmart Pro B9180 Printer, where there are also a variety of settings possible.
    I’m running XP-Pro.
    Here’s Where I Get Confused
    Everything I have read about color management (various web sites, forums, books, etc) says to have the image, monitor, and printer all in the same color space.
    Everything I read about PSE 8 (same sources) says to set PSE 8 to ‘Always Optimize for Printing’ under Edit>Color Settings in order to get the best prints.  This displays photos based on the Adobe RGB color space. 
    I am taking pictures in sRGB, and telling PSE 8 to process them in RGB by selecting ‘Always Optimize for Printing’.  Is this something I should be concerned about?  Should I reset my camera for RGB?
    Further, by selecting ‘Always Optimize for Printing’, I am setting PSE 8 for RGB while my monitor displays sRGB.  Is this an important issue or is it also much ado about technicalities that an amateur should not worry about?  It does violate the ‘keep them in the same color space’ rule.
    Next, when I go to File>Print and get the Print window and then do the Page Setup and Select Printer, I then go to More Options in the lower left of the window.  Under the More Options window, I select Color management and select Photoshop Elements Manages Colors.  Next, there is Image Space, which is fixed and not subject to selection from a drop down menu. 
    I understand that this is the image space of the image I took with my camera and that information is embedded in the image.  Correct?
    Next, there is Printer Profile.  But, from what I have read, this is where the IEC profile of the paper being printed on is supposed to be selected, isn’t it? 
    Shouldn’t this more appropriately be called Paper Profile, or Printing Media Profile?  Further, this drop down menu appears to be somewhat erratic, sometimes showing all of the paper profiles I believe are loaded, sometimes not. It also shows listings such as Working RGB-Adobe RGB (1988), Adobe RGB 1988, Dot Gain 10%, 15%.... along with a lot of paper profiles.  Aren’t those profiles unnecessary here?
    I’ve used both Relative Colorimetric and Perceptual Rendering and am happy with either one. 
    Next, when I go to Printer Preferences, in order to “…disable color management in the printer preferences dialog”, under the Color Tab, I select Application Managed Colors from the Color management drop down menu, and also have the option of selecting ColorSmart/sRGB and Adobe RGB (1988).  
    Is there any time when I should use either ColorSmart/sRGB or Adobe RGB  (1988)?  If I were staying with my camera’s sRGB setting, given the fact that the monitor is sRGB, would the appropriate selections be ‘Printer Manages Colors’ and ‘ColorSmart/sRGB’?
    Finally, under the Features Tab, I go to look for the same paper I selected under Printer Profile (Question 4 above).  If it is one of the pre-loaded (by HP) profiles, it is there, but if it is a profile I downloaded, say for an Ilford paper, it isn’t listed, and I need to guess at an equivalent type of paper to select.
    Is there any way to get that listing to appear under the Paper Type drop down menu?
    I know that this is a long post, but it helped me to clarify my ‘issues’.  Thank you for any and all suggestions, answers, guidance and help.

    RIK,
    Some printers have long names, esp. HP printers, and PSE gets ":confused." In control panel>devices and printers, right click on the default printer, go to printer properties, and rename the default printer to something short, e.g. "Our Printer." That may fix it..

  • Can I deactivate and uninstall elements 11 and reinstall on my wifes computer?

    I would like to deactivate and uninstall adobe photo elements 11 from my computer and reinstall it on my wifes computer. Is this possible?

    baiken280
    Adobe allows you to install the purchased serial number for your Premiere Elements 11 version on no more than 2 of your computers. So, if you have a 3rd computer and want to use the same product (same purchased serial number) on the 3rd computer, you need to deactivate the product on one of the other 2 computers. Deactivate is not the same as uninstall.
    In Premiere Elements 11, deactivation is done in an opened project via Help Menu/Deactivate. If uninstall is wanted additionally, then the uninstall is done in the usual Control Panel manner.
    I am assuming here that Windows computers are the only kind involved here? Please confirm. Are you working from installation files from an online purchase or from installation disc from the product purchased in boxed packaging?
    From what I understand of the Adobe Licensing (you can verify with Adobe - we are not Adobe), you cannot/should not be using the two activated ones with the same purchased serial number at the same time.
    Please review the above and then let us know if any questions or clarification needed.
    Thanks.
    ATR

  • I tried to upgrade PSe-13 and get Error Code: U44M1I210.  I restarted and had loaded Elements and Premier elements separately and got same error code for both.  Someone said to Remove and reinstall but has that worked for anyone??

    I tried customer support and got "not my job"

    Meowia for Error 201 please see Error downloading Creative Cloud applications - http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/error-downloading-cc-apps.html.  Error 213 indicates there was problem locating the update or an incorrect URL.  The troubleshooting steps are still the same as both errors are related to failure of the current network connection.

  • Cost element and Line item reports show different actual costs

    Hi PS experts,
    My client has an issue pertaining to actual cost reports. The cost element report shows actual costs $42,000 for one WBS and when I double click to see details the value it shows is $2100. Even when I checked line item report for this WBS the value is $2100. What could be the reason for getting different values? If some one throw some light on this it would be great helpful to me
    Regards,
    Laxminarsimha

    Laxminarsimha
    The values in CJI3 should be correct and will include all postings (e.g. Settlement values) and possibly Actual Revenues unless a filter is in place - so take this as being your correct figure to start with.
    Your drilldown will show the same value as CJI3 because it is CJI3
    Any cost element report you are using is probably correct for what you are asking - is this a Standard Cost Element Report you are using or is it bespoke
    One thing to be careful of when you drilldown on Cost Element Reports is that you do not always get the a make up of the value you have drilled down
    e.g.
    Cost Element Report was run for Period 1 to 6 2008 and shows £100.00
    You drilldown and sometimes the drilldown automatically shows ALL line items e.g £500.00 (not just the values for periods 1 to 6 of 2008 which you may expect £100.00)
    In the past I've removed the drilldown capability from bespoke cost element reports to prevent drilldown to the line item report (which is CJI3) because of this problem.
    Usually where values for a a number of periods only (not total costs) was required
    Other factors to consider
    Revenues/Settlements may be excluded from Cost Element Report but will not be excluded from CJI3 unless you specifically restrict
    You need to identify which types are postings are missing from the Cost Element Report (what is common...cost element, dr/cr indicator, business transaction)
    I've also hit the mistake in the past where I've asked for periods 1 2007 to period 3 2008 and instead of giving me just over a years worth of actual it gave me actuals for periods 1 to 3 for 2007 and 1 to 3 for 2008.
    Hope this helps
    Steve

  • Standard and actual costing run

    I am doing actual coting run ckmlcp every month end on last of the month. stadard costing run I am doing on start of the month on 1st day of the month before actual transactions taking place.
    Here the problem is I already did the stadard costing and actual costing runfor april, now i want to do stadard costing today midnight 1AM for june and I want to do actual costing tomarrow evening 6PM for may.
    April stadard price is Rs150 and current stadard price is Rs 160 beacause of 1st june costing run.  If I will do the costing for May month now means  (1st)tomarrow evening which stadard price it will pick in ckmlcp and varience calculated.

    as cost estimate is run for the material in plant u can not  get cogs at  depot  level.
    Edited by: kumaraguru v on Jan 17, 2008 12:24 PM
    Edited by: kumaraguru v on Jan 17, 2008 12:25 PM

Maybe you are looking for