Customised item separation ( same item ) at invoice level

hello gurus,
plz go through my requirement.........
material (say X) is maintained in PC unit of measure. it can be packed in the denomination of 1,4 and 2 only.
pack of 1 unit is refered as A
pack of 2 unit is referred as B
pack of 4 unit is referred as C
if ordered qty is 25 (say), then at invoice it should show:------
    6  C
    1  A
how to configure this? Please guide...
regards
Vishal

hi.
I understand from question
Pr00 = 50 + 50 =100
Freight = 20
total = 120.
Discount :10 = 110 Rs.
user RA01, RA00.
thanks
Kuntla

Similar Messages

  • Total amount of all the items of invoice at document level to present ....

    We have two cubes one is sales document count cube (header data) and other one is sales transation cube (item level data) . Invoice net val is there in sales document count cube and profit center, principal and item category is ther in sales transation cube.
    our requirement is ,total amount of all the items of invoice at document level to present along with principal, profit center & item category.
    This has to be done in the document count cube and not the transaction cube.
    note: multi provider is not solution. There any solution at query level?

    hi
    If your using 2 ODS one for header and one for Item to 2 Cubes.....
    Then just create a update rule between Item data ODS to Document CUbe mapping the new keyfigure ( Net value of total of all items in sales order )
    If not tel me how the cubes and ODS are fed the data
    Assign points if useful
    Regards
    N Ganesh

  • Create Item AR Invoice to Service AR Credit Memo

    Hi Expert,
    Customer is running 2007A PL30. We understanding that it is impossible to copy Item AR Invoice to service AR credit memo. It is customer business practice to issue same AR invoice to all customer for same item and later issue service AR credit memo to customer. Customer wants the item information to be copied to service AR credit memo rather than keying multiple rows to indicate discount given on which items. It is not possible to include discount at original AR invoice.
    Any workaround or solution to solve this problem?
    Regards
    Thomas

    Please note the following:
    Item and Service type documents do not have a one to one match of the row level fields.  So the ItemCode from the AR Invoice could not be copied to a AR Service CM as the ItemCode column is not exposed and these are 2 different types of documents.
    This is what you could do....
    Open the AR Credit Memo...Enter the Customer Code....
    Add a formatted search to the Description field to Display the list of Items and take the Invoice number from the user as a parameter.
    Query same below
    SELECT T0.ItemCode FROM [dbo].[INV1] T0 INNER JOIN [dbo].[OINV] T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry
    WHERE T1.CardCode = $[$4.0.0.] AND T1.DocNum = '[%0]'

  • Batch split items in invoice

    Hello Friends,
    I have a delivery item with batch split and which consists of 5 batch split items. If i create an invoice from delivery , invoice is whowing all 5 batch split items as 5 line items in the invlice. User wants only the one item  with full quantity should show in invoice.
    Please guide me how to do this.
    Thanks,
    Ashok S

    fyi,
    -While Creating Invoice for Batch split material, System copies all the batch items including main item, where as, system should copy/combine all batch split items into Main item, batch split items should not be shown in different line items in Invoice.- ?
    In copy control from the delivery type to billing type VTFL, for the item category maintain billing quantity as G. This will ensure that the batches are clubbed into single line item.
    In Item Category of the Billing, goto VOV7 u2013 maintain billing relevance as u201CMu201D.
    - Batch Management in STO, after creating delivery via VL10F, wrt: STO order, automatic batch determination is not happening for the batch managed material. But for the same Material, from SD it is working fine. System displays message as u201C No Batch search procedure assigned to the order typeu201D
    In V/C5, batch has to assigned to the determination procedure in combination of Sales Org / Dist Channel / Division / Order type u2013 Search Procedure / Check batch indicator.
    *Sales area should be taken from STO-ME22n, Shipping tab at item level.
    *Order type should be, default Order type from the specific Delivery type eg:NL-
    Item Category for STO main item : NLN / batch item: ULN, both has to be marked for automatic batch determination indicator in IMG-LG-Batch Mgmt u2013 Batch detu2019n & Batch check u2013 Automatic batch detu2019n in SD u2013 Activate Auto. Batch detu2019n for Delivery Item Catu2019s
    After following above procedure, system displays error message as u201C Item Category is not maintainedu201D
    -Tcode:0184-Delivery item cat detu2019n
    Maintain entries as u201CDel type/Item cat group / Item Usage / High. Item Cat- Default, Item catu201D
    Eg: NL u2013 NORM u2013 CHSP -= ULN
    CHSP u2013 Batch split item.
    NOTE: Copy Controls from Delivery u2013 billing at item level u2013 ULN should not be maintained.

  • Payment with residual items in invoices with defer $1 in transaction F-32

    Dear all,
    We receive the following message when we want to clear an item which has a deferred tax code.
    Payment with residual items in invoices with defer $1
    Is there a way to clear these items? I've found on the forum:
    " Please note that the residual item option is not supported by the
    deferred tax solution. Please use the partial payment option instead.
    The report does not support residual items payment. The reason
    is clear. The second and subsequent residual item payments have no
    reference to original invoice. The report blocks such postings.
    If you use deferred tax solution in your system (RFUMSV25 or RFUMSV50)
    it is forbidden to use residual item method "
    However in the next lines the person said that for F-32 it works:
    "But it allows me to do residual item in F-32 (customer clearing)".
    Can this problem be solved or is it just impossible?
    Regards.
    Leen
    Edited by: Leen Debrabanter on Dec 8, 2010 1:23 PM

    Hi Leen,
    I'm facing the same error in F-28. has this been answered? If so, kindly provide the solution.
    Thanks

  • Reg: Maximize the Number of Line Items in Invoice Verification

    Hi Gurus,
                 For a Client who is dealing in Retail business,there is a necessity to maintain a huge number of line items at Invoice Verification level.Standard SAP has some maxium line items for each document type.Where are the control for maximum line items and how to increase that?
    Regards,
    Sarosh

    Hi,
    At Billing-Country specific settings you will be able to maintain maximum 3 digit billing item no i.e 999.
    Any other suggestion.
    Regards,
    Sarosh

  • To remove line items from invoice which have 0 qty.

    Dear Friends,
    Requirement: To remove line items from invoice which have 0 qty.
    For this I wrote the code in RV60AFZZ. It is very well happening, but when last line item comes it is failing.
    What I have written is " DELETE XVBRP WHERE FKIMG = '0' ." . This code is deleting all the line items with 0 qty except last line item.
    Actually, this exit works line item wise. Once the line item is appended, the code what I have written is working. For the last line item, record is not appended when this exit is triggerred, thats why last record is not deleted.
    The include where all line items are getting appended in XVBRP is LV60AB03. I modified this also. Same code I have written here to delete the records once it is appended. But after doing this the problem is - invoice is not getting created.
    Please help me in doing this so as to delete this last record also. I tried with other logics also, not able to track the last record.
    Please help me to resolve this problem.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Check user exit RV60AFZC.
    RV_INVOICE_DOCUMENT_ADD is the FM which is called to generate number for the invoice after all the line items have been added to vbrp structure. Add a break-point here and check.
    All the best.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • Dunning Procedure (FBMP) - Total Due Items from Dunning Level

    Hi,
    In Dunning Procedure (FBMP), there is a field called "Total Due Items from Dunning Level" ...
    Questions: What does this field mean?
    Besides, if possible, kindly explain the following:
    1) Min.days in arrears (acct):
    Days in arrears which at least one item in this account must have for a dunning notice to be created. These minimum days in arrears have no influence on calculating the days overdue.
    If I put 50, then does this mean that system won't generate dunning notice, although in the dunning level 1: 15, dunning level 2: 30, and dunning level 3: 45?
    Thanks.

    hi,
    The dunning intervals are usually meant for two purposes, one to send notices at appropriate intervals, to calculate interest on arrears accordingly for delay in payment.  The dunning days say 45 will not be calculated from the 15th day but from the original date of document posting. Say if you have an open item on 01.01.2008 and the dunning procedure calls for intervals 15.30.45 etc. first dunning is due on 16.05.2008 and second dunning 01.06.2008 third dunning due on 16.06.2008.  
    Some other useful info. whenever a dunning run is complete the vendor master and the line items gets updated automatically. So if you have to run dunning again for the one already run say, you want to generate the dunning notice of the 2nd dunning then you have to delete these details from the base records and schedule dunning once again.  Otherwise you obviously will generate notice of the last dunning run.  Also if you are scheduling dunning for group of vendors then all vendors should have the same dunning levels, otherwise the output will be of the latest dunning level. But the master records and line items gets updated correctly.  Example you are dunning for two vendors one has got the second level due and other has got 3rd level due but the output for the two will be the output of 3rd level . But the vendor master and line items gets updated as 2 and 3 accordingly. This will happen if and only the vendors fall in the same dunning procedure.
    clarify if you have still doubts,
    regards

  • No. of child Items should be printed with the parent item at row level

    Hi..
    that the number of the child Items should be printed on A/R Invoice along with the parent Item at row level.
    I want to know whether this is possible through PLD or not . if yes, please let me know how ?
    Regards
    Rakhi
    Edited by: Rakhiatsap on Jul 12, 2010 9:21 AM

    hi Joseph
    I  have defined the Sales type of BOM for the parent Item. At the of punching the A/R Invoice, all the child items appear under the parent items and changeable in terms of Numbers. and in the printed Invoice  parent item details appear.
    What i want that the only number of child items of parent item should appear at the row level.
    Regards
    Rakhi..

  • Sorting of order items on invoice

    How can we make sorting on order items in invoice when we are clubbing together many sd-orders in one invoice?
    In the document flow, the sd-orders are sorted in a correct matter - but when we look at the invoice the materials is not sorted in the same way.
    Take a look at the link [sorting|http://img212.imageshack.us/img212/2433/sortingdocumentflowvsinit8.jpg]
    I would expect the order items from sd-document 37403, then 37404 etc. to be sorted in the invoice in the same way as document flow - hence order items from 37403 first, then order items from 37404 etc.
    Is this possible and if so how?

    I haven't received any answers or feedback to this question.....does it mean it is not possible to sort this on the SD-side?

  • When-validate-item at form level do not fire

    Hi, I wrote a when-validate-item at form level to do same check in all items of a screen and note that this trigger do not fire when executing the form. does someone know why this form-level when-validate item do not fire. Are there some conditions i probably forgot to have? Thnaks very much.

    Hi, if you also have a validate-item trigger on the item itself, this may be overriding the form-level validate item.
    At the ITEM-LEVEL:
    if a when-validate-item trigger exists and the Execution Hierarchy property of the trigger is set to override then the item-level trigger will fire instead of any trigger by the same name at any higher scope.
    So make sure you do not have validate-item triggers at the item or block level that may be overriding the form-level when-validate-item.
    To see the properties of a trigger, highlight the trigger and press F4
    Hope this helps!

  • Error in clearing - Payment with residual items in invoices with defer $1

    Hi
    I did customer advance with service tax.
    Entry:
    Bank A/c... Dr 52000
       To Advance Rs.50000
       To service tax interim Rs.2000
    Now i ran F.38 and Rs.2000 got transferred to service tax final A/c
    I did FB70 (for total amount of Rs.150000 + 4%)
    Entry:
    Customer A/c... Dr 156000
       To Sales A/c 150000
        To service tax interim Rs.6000
    I did F-39 (clearing advance)
    Entry:
    Advance Rs.50000... Dr
    Service tax interim Rs.2000... Dr
       To Customer A/c Rs.5222
    Now there is a debit of Rs.156000 and credit of Rs.52000 by putting Rs. 104000 into residual
    Now i tried to clear this in F-32. But it gave following error:
    Payment with residual items in invoices with defer $1
    Please tell me how to resolve this error.
    For F.38, i m using RFUMSV25 program and i am on ECC6.0
    Edited by: Deepak Agrawal on Apr 16, 2010 4:32 PM

    Hello Deepak,
    Did you find the solution of the error message FF804, i have the same probleme ?
    Regards

  • Unable to hide feilds for a limit item at PO level in SRM 7.0

    Hi,
    Currently we are working in SRM 7.0. extended classic scenario. While creating a limit item at PO level we are unable to control the custom feilds in general data tab.
    We have created some custom fields. And we are trying to control (Visible,Enable & Required) these custom fields from IMG settings (Customer Metadata for item fields in Normal entries) for LIMIT items at PO Level. But we are unable to control.
    Where this is working fine at Shopping cart level.
    Can anybody help me in this regard.
    Thanks.
    Regards,
    Kalyani

    Please refer to this link.
    https://websmp105.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700001969972008E.pdf
    This has everything you need to know about extending fields and controlling there behaviour on UI.
    Regards
    Mustameer

  • Sales order display-how to change color of item with high level 0

    Please does anyone know how can i chenge the color of item with high level 0 in display of sales order in red or yellow so it can be seen better for better searching on page?
    thank you in advance...
    regards..

    You'd probably have to do a modification in SD for that. But what you can do, is make the higher level item not changeable. You could also set the display range to UHAU to only see the main items, do this in transaction VOV8. Or you could change your item category in VOV7 only to show main items.
    good luck

  • How can I have the pricing conditions at the item and header level of the d

    How can I have the pricing conditions at the item and header level of the delivery? There exist "condition" tabs both the header and the item level of the delivery but the contents of the tabs are empty. I'll be happy if you can help me. Thanks in advance....

    Hi
    If you want to have the pricing procedure at delivery level then you need to assign a pricing procedure at delivery level also
    Just go through the path to maintain the pricing procedure at delivery level.
    IMG -> Logistics execution -> Shipping -> Basic Shipping Functions -> Pricing -> Pricing Procedure. for Delivery.
    But can you be more clear if the above one is not your query ?
    Regards
    Srinath

Maybe you are looking for