Do newer versions of project files build on older ones?

I'm asking this for a friend.
The project in question has been revised several times. If one was to delete the older-version project files to recover some disc space, would it also delete the same resource files used in the newer versions?

To be clear, I hope your friend is not relying on auto-save to save their projects. Auto-saves in the auto-save folder are snap shot of a project file saved at adjustable intervals. These do not overwrite the active project file (Like what Final Cut X does). Your open project should be saved manually and often. You can "Save As" to create a new or back up project (redundant in most cases in my opinion).
What I recommend is to go into the Auto-save preferences and set it to save every 5-10 minutes, and raise the number of copies from a default of 20 to 100 or more. It really depends if you want to back up hours or days of work.
Also, when loading an autosave project, be sure to choose the project file by date\time created and not the the auto generated filename. This is because after the autosave project version limit has been reached, the numbering in the file names will rollover and then save over the 1st one, then second, and so on.
Lastly, when loading an autosave project, immediately do a "Save As" to you main project folder, outside of the auto-save folder, or else premiere will create a whole new set of sub folders, including an autosave folder.
I've seen confused editors trying to find their project, and they have like 4 levels of autosave folders and they have no clue what they have worked on.

Similar Messages

How to uncheck "Add as a new version to existing files" inside the "Add a document" dialog

I am working on a publishing site collection using the enterprise wiki template. Currently when users want to insert an image inside the rich text editor, they will be prompted with the following:-
And if the user insert a picture that already exists then it will replace the existing one, which might cause the picture to be displayed inside a Wiki page which it does not belong to !!
So is there a way to do any of the following:-
Give the new picture a unique auto generated name?
To un-check the   “Add as a new version to existing files” by default?
Or to always prevent replacing images, as this can cause many conflicts !!
Can anyone advice ?please?

You can do it using below script
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:51tmEQHanZoJ:vegardstromsoy.blogspot.com/2011/05/jquery-to-override-sharepoint-ootb.html+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in
$(document).ready(function() {
    if (document.title ==
"Upload Document") {
        $("input[id$='OverwriteSingle']").attr("checked",false);
        $("input[id$='OverwriteMultiple']").attr("checked",false);
http://hansiandy.wordpress.com/2010/10/19/sharepoint-20072010-tips-uncheck-add-as-a-new-version-to-existing-files-checkbox-on-upload-aspx-in-moss-2007sharepoint-2010/
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered
but where i should add the following jQuery :-
$(document).ready(function() {
if (document.title == "Upload Document") {
$("input[id$='OverwriteSingle']").attr("checked",false);
$("input[id$='OverwriteMultiple']").attr("checked",false);
inside the master page or insdie the upload.aspx page ?

New After Effects project file for download

New After Effects project file for download:
http://marko-stojkovic.blogspot.com/p/animation_03.html
and more on: http://www.marko-stojkovic.blogspot.com/p/animation_03.html

Not that I'm aware of. I think the largest one I've ever made was around 98mb. At that point, the file became way too cumbersome, and I ended up splitting up the project more efficiently into multiple project files. There may be a limit, but if not, then it would probably be any file size limits imposed by your OS.

New Album from Smart Album makes NEW VERSIONS of all files? Bug?

Got what I think is an oddball bug here, but see if any of you have experienced it.
Making a new album of the contents of a Smart Album with about 600 images resulted in the SBOD, a lot of time and disk activity and the creation of NEW VERSIONS of all the files populating the new album. This, of course, also doubled the number of files in the original Smart Album, since the keywords used are a match. First thinking it might be something I had not read in the manual, I grabbed the book and could not find this behavior listed…..so….my expected result is a new album with the identical contents of the Smart Album selected as the source.
I am creating a presentation for a client whose work is in multiple projects in a ~150GB library. All images are heavily keyworded, so making Smart Albums of specific elements of the work was easy. My intended workflow to get through this mountain of pix was to make Smart Albums of specific elements, then make New Albums from each, manually edit and reorg these albums individually, then combine my edits into a single book file.
Now the structure leading to this problem is as follows:
1) I created a single “main” folder to store all projects and other elements and hierarchy for this client. Clicking on this folder returns some 8500 images spanning multiple projects…all as expected.
2) At the top level of this “main” folder, I made about 20 Smart Albums to presort the main elements I wanted to include. I made the first Smart Album by clicking the icon in the top bar. The rest of the smart albums I made by duplicating the previous Smart Album, then changing keyword selection. I would select the new keywords I wanted, then de-select the ones that were from the album I had duplicated. The reason I did it that was for speed, there is little delay in displaying the items that were already searched for, and a significant delay in going from new. Anyway, somewhere in this process, I decided to organize my workflow further, so I created a new folder (calling it Smart Album Selects) at the same level as the Smart Albums, and then dragged the Smart Albums into the new Smart Album Selects folder. Still, no problem.
3) Later in my session, I went to create another new Smart Album, and this time I did so already in the Smart Album Selects folder. When I opened the HUD to select the keywords, the Keyword area and check box were greyed out!!! Weird, I though….so I simply duplicated an existing Smart Album from my Smart Album Selects folder, opened the HUD, and sure enough, all my keywords were there. I changed the keyword selection, and went on with work. During the day I did this same operation 3 more times, making 4 Smart Albums created the same way.
4) OK…here is the strange behavior. To make my new custom album from the Smart Album selects, I selected one of the Smart Albums, and clicked on the New Album icon. Got the expected dialog, make with 1 image or all images, selected all images, and instead of a new album popping up moments later, I got the SBOD, and the Activity Monitor said Aperture and my hard disk was cranking away. About 4-5 minutes later, Aperture became responsive again, and had created a new album. However, upon inspection, the album contained NEW VERSIONS of all the images that were in the Smart Album, about 600 files.
5) I went back and clicked on a different Smart Album in the same spot in the hierarchy…but it was one of the first ones I had created (meaning I built this BEFORE reorganizing into the Smart Album Selects folder). Tried making a new album again, with 1 image, worked fine, popped up instantly. Tried selecting 4 images, same thing, worked fine. Selected All, made album, worked fine.
6) Went back to the Smart Album I had the problem with, this time selected 4 images, make New Album, and sure enough the New Album had NEW VERSIONS of the pix again…OK, I went back to the top of my folder hierarchy, my “main” folder and made a brand new Smart Album by clicking the icon, and selecting keywords. Made a new album from that, no problem, popped up instantly, no new versions.
7) I then re-made all my Smart Albums at the top of the folder hierarchy, and they all work fine creating new albums. I got back to the task at hand…hopefully there is enough data here to let the Aperture engineers find this problem…Assuming, that is it is not just me misunderstanding some element in the program.
Sorry for the length, but has anyone else run into this??
PowerBook G4 1.67 2GB RAM 128MB ATI Video, External FW Drives for library Mac OS X (10.4.7)

Nope, all the images at this point in my workflow have been unstacked, with the non-picked members of the original stacks discarded.
Now that it seems I am not the only one who has witnessed this behavior, what I am really trying to find out, is what is the definitive proper operation of this according to the Aperture group at Apple.
Assuming I have opened a Smart Album with images displayed, and no images are selected.
Is the correct behavior:
1) Selecting New Album makes a new Untitled Album (very quickly) with the identical contents of the Smart Album....OR...
2) Selecting New Album makes a new Untitled Album (slowly) with NEW VERSIONS of the contents of the Smart Album. (Also, depending upon the number of images, typically brings up SBOD and makes Aperture unresponsive until it is complete.)
Now what I expected to happen was #1, as it is what happens when I select New Album when a project is selected. Given Apple's human interface creedo for intuitive operation, I think this is the most intuitive choice, because I can't think of a good reason I would want to double the number of versions of all files in an album, unless I expressly told the app to do this.
Could an Apple guy provide the definitive answer, please...
Thanks in advance for your help.
PowerBook G4 1.67 2GB RAM 128MB ATI Video, External FW Drives for library Mac OS X (10.4.7)

I have downloaded Firefox 5.0 at least three times and saved file, but I don't know how to install and run. It keeps asking me to download new version and Save file. I'm in a never ending loop, it keeps downloading same exe & does not install Please Help

Please tell me how to install and run new Firefox 5.00 after I have downloaded the new version and chosen Save File. I just go into Loop and screen says new version available and download again !

Did you ever resolve the iCloud problem.I am in the same position and its driving me mad!!! If you have a link to an solution I would appreciate it.

Do not want new version for rdl file for each snapshot rendering

ssrs 2012 sp1 sharepoint mode, sharepoint 2013
option set for the report - render from snapshot, a schedule set for the snapshots creation
each snapshot rendering adds new viersion to the rdl file with updated field
Execution DateTime - not really sure who needs this "feature" but it would be nice to switch this off/fix a bug
Sergey Vdovin

Hi Sergey,
Sorry for my misunderstanding.
In SharePoint, the generation of a report version is determined by the modifications of the entire SharePoint list item. If any field of the list item is changed , it will create a new version for the list item. For a report RDL file uploaded to a SharePoint
document library, the report version is not just created based on the modifications to the report content. In your case, once it has generating a new snapshot, it will modify the column Execution DateTime value.
Besides, once we configure a report to render based on a snapshot, the Execution Datatime field will be available in the library view. However, if we create snapshots manually rather than based on a schedule, this field won’t be updated, hence, the report
version won’t be added. If we configure the snapshot to be generated based on a schedule, the Execution Datetime will be updated each time the snapshot is generated, thus the report version will be updated. This is actually a by design inconsistent behavior
between Reporting Services and SharePoint.
To avoid this behavior, on Reporting Services side, you need to either disable the snapshot or configure the snapshot not to run based on a schedule. Taking into account that this may be unacceptable for your, there is a possible approach on the SharePoint
side. In SharePoint, if we want an item to update without creating a new version based on a judgment condition, we can use Visual Studio workflow and with a code to determine when to update list item. Here is some resource about this topic for your refer:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/750658ca-5a5d-49cb-99c2-70335fd5375b/updating-an-item-in-list-with-out-creating-a-version?forum=sharepointdevelopmentprevious
http://www.codegain.com/articles/sharepoint/developmentprogramming/what-is-the-difference-between-splistitem-systemupdate-and-splistitem-update-method.aspx
Since the approach is related to SharePoint development, if you need more help, I recommend you post a question in the following forum to get dedicated support:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/home?forum=sharepointdevelopmentprevious
Best Regards,
Alisa Tang
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Alisa Tang
TechNet Community Support

How to get rid of new version itunes and go back to older version

I DO NOT LIKE THE NEW VERSION OF ITUNES
HOW DO I GET RID OF OT AND GO BACK TO OLDER VERSION

You can get closer to the old look with ctrl-b to turn on the menu bar and ctrl-s to turn on the sidebar, then select Artists from the selection of views across the top.
If you still want to roll back to iTunes 10.7 first download a copy of the installer from here, uninstall iTunes and suppporting software, i.e. Apple Application Support & Apple Mobile Device Support. Reboot. Restore the pre-upgrade version of your library database as per the diagram below, then install iTunes 10.7.
See iTunes Folder Watch for a tool to scan the media folder and catch up with any changes made since the backup file was created.
tt2

How can I download the old version of ibooks that will operate with 5.1? I cannot download the new version in order to get a compatable one!!

have read the 'help' given for this question from another ipad owner --which was to download the current version and then might be able to get a compatable version --- but the new version will not download -- just tells me I have to upgrade to version 6 which is not possible on the 1st generation ipad! I cannot understand why the older versions of ibooks and Kindle are not avilable for those of us who cannot afford to buy the new ipads. Please can anyone help?!!!!

Sorry, but you can't.
 Cheers, Tom

How to install a newer version when I already have an older version?

I have an older version of Firefox. How do I install the latest version? If I follow the instructions for installing Firefox will it automatically upgrade my current version? Why is Firefox not automatically installing newer versions?

hello rkhpci, yes firefox should automatically update every six weeks (or between if there's a critical security update). in the past this might not have worked when you had a restricted user account.
please download the newest firefox version for your system and language from https://www.mozilla.org/firefox/all/ and install it on top of your current installation. this will keep all your bookmarks, customizations and so on...

I cannot update to New version of iPhoto. Still have older version despite uninstalling application and redownloading it? any suggestions. My current version is the 2012 version, but it is not updating to the new version

I updated to OS X Mavericks. I updated all of the new iLife applications. iPhoto is not updating to new version. I have iPhoto '11.
The icon on the dashboard has the new logo, however when I open the application it hasn't updated. I tried deleting the application and redownloading it. Still stuck with old version

I have exactly the same problem as carson.
iPhoto tells me that I have Version 9.5, and the info-page tells me "iPhoto 11, Version 9.5 (902.7)", and the logo is the new one.
However, the programme is exactly the same as the old version - not just similar, exactly the same! The screenshots on the apple-website show a dark grey, almost black interface, for example (like the new iMovie). However, my version still shows the old light grey.
I deleted the iphoto-app entirely (and was horrified to lose all my photos), but that also didn't work out.

Error: A newer version of data type was found than one required

Hi Experts,
we made a changes to a table and then transported the table to the quality system. But a program which is referring to this table, results in dump with the below error message.
Error Message>>>>>>>>>>" A newer version of data type <TABLE> was found than one required "
The issue occures inspite of
1. re-activated the table and send to quality system
2. Re-activated the program
3. Activated and adjusted database in SE14.
Please let me know the correction to be taken to resolve the issue.
Regards
Suresh Kumar

This happens when you modify your new data element, domain while another program is currently using it.
Simply get out completely of the program, re activate the program, reactivate the table. You might need to run se14 to convert the database table but this does not happen frequently. Try first to reactivate the program
Dean
Edited by: Dean Ton on Mar 8, 2012 9:54 PM
Edited by: Dean Ton on Mar 8, 2012 9:56 PM

New version possibly did not completely uninstall older version?

On my computer (Running Windows 7 and Firefox 3.6.12) I noticed in my add/remove programs, two instances of Firefox (the extra being for 3.6.3), so I switch from the limited user I run as generally to the administrator account to uninstall the old version, but I find that in the add/remove programs panel in the administrator account there is only one version listed and it's the older version (3.6.3). So I open up Firefox in the admin account to check the version, and find it's the new version that runs, but for some reason it does not show up in add/remove programs when using the admin account. I want to uninstall the old version but I am afraid that since it is the only version listed in the add/remove programs panel in the admin account that it will delete the new version too with all my bookmarks and add-ons and settings and whitelists. This fear is further noted when I try to uninstall the older version as a test and it prompts me to close the running instance of the newer version of Firefox.
What is happening here? Can I delete the old version without messing up the new one? Why can't the admin account's add/remove program panel see the new version, but the limited user's one can?

You most likely only have that old entry in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\Mozilla Firefox left. It happens more often that the updater leaves old entries in the "CurrentVersion\Uninstall" registry key. If you are comfortable with editing the registry then you can remove that key or just change the name to the current version. Otherwise just leave it as is to avoid problems or uninstall and reinstall Firefox.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere (not in the Firefox program folder) and won't be affected by an uninstall and reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.

TimeMachine to save ONLY the current version of Apps? Not the older ones...

Hi everyone!
I update my apps a lot, or I modify them (XSlimmer, Trimmit, Monolingual, etc...)...
Therefore, I have TimeMachine that saves me all the old (and heavy) versions of all my apps.
Ho can I get TimeMachine to save only the current (last) version of the apps stored on my internal HD?
Thank you!

No no no!
I ment, I have the lastest versions of my apps on my internal HD, but TimeMachine (on an external HD, obviously) saves ALL the versions of them (the older and bulkier ones too, which take space for nothing)...
I'd like to know if I can tell TimeMachine to save only the latest versions of the apps (and not the older ones...)
Thanks

New versions of swf files wont download automatically?!

Let's say I have a main swf file. If I edit that and upload,
chances are good that it will be re-downloaded on my client's
browsers when they refresh. However, if that swf then loads a swf
using "loadMovie()" that has been edited and uploaded, the browser
(safari 2.03 / Firefox 1.5 on Mac or pc) will not go and get the
latest version. It will display the cached swf file?!?! I have
"<meta HTTP-EQUIV="Expires" CONTENT="Mon, 04 Dec 1999 21:29:02
GMT">" on all of the html pages to (I thought) force the browser
to redownload all content, including all swf files.
What can I do to ensure that external swf's loaded with
"loadMovie()" get pulled from the server when they have been
edited??
This has been a thorn in my side for a while now. It doesn't
happen all the time, but enough where it is extremely frustrating
and embarrasing to try and explain to the client. I am using Flash
Pro 2004 and am using "loadMovie("
http://domain/path_to_swf",
"_root.mc")" to load the external swf file.
Thanks in advance!

Interesting. Could it be happening because I don't have the Flash Player installed on my Mac? (Hadn't gotten around to that yet since buying this Mac, and wanted to research a bit first to understand this whole Apple vs. Flash issue...)
So could it be that since I don't have Flash Player installed, a misconfigured web server is downloading the .swf file to my mac directly?
Sorry if these are all stupid questions; I feel a bit stupid being so new to the Mac world. But could this also be related to the news today of this flashback trojan?

How to Merge the Contents of Two Folders in Lion, Keeping the Newer Versions of Duplicate Files.

Select and copy all the contents of the folder containing the newer files. Paste the files ONTO the folder containing the older files. The unique files will be copied into the older folder without further ado. For the duplicates, a window will appear warning that a file with the same name already exists in the older folder. Check the "Apply to All" box and click on the Replace button, not the Skip button. These steps will merge all the files in the newer folder into the older folder, replacing the duplicates with the copies from the newer folder.
Unfortunately, the only information that the warning window provides about the duplicates is their common name, not sizes, dates, or times. These steps worked for me because I knew for certain that all the newer files were in one folder.

Great, I just lost 10 GB of data thanks to OSX folder merge... because appaerantly I should have known better not to keep a subfolder inside my folder I was trying to merge
I can not beleive more people don't have a problem with this. Merge contents in Lion does NOT merge contents if 1 or more of those supposed "contents" is a subfolder
Merge contents of two folders only works for files, it does NOT work for subfolders!!!!
Can we please get this acknowledged as a bug that needs fixing?
EXAMPLE:
Drive1 / Folder1
               - text1.txt
               - text2.txt
               - / subfolder / text3.text
MERGE TO
Drive2 / Folder1
               - text1.txt (this gets updated / merged)
               - text2.txt (this gets updated / merged)
               - / subfolder /
                         - text.txt
                         - text2.txt     (this should get text3.txt merged into it, from Drive1, but instead this subfolder is REPLACED, and NOT MERGED!!)
Why would i want to replace a folder if I'm trying to merge it!?
Almost 2013 and OSX still cant merge a folder? unbelievable

Do newer versions of project files build on older ones?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for