"intercompany for billing in advance" flow to implement

Hi dear all,
Further to the migration EHP5 of our sap system, the flow "intercompany for billing in advance" does not work any more. It is necessary to find why.
Can you please indicate me what are the steps necessary to implement this flow. I have to resolve this problem asap.
Thank you for your help.

Hi ,
As of knowledge there is not much differences in between R/3 4.7 and EHP 5 In SD module.
Configuration for Inter company Sales will be same.
If this is a Special scenario, Kindly check the settings in present system. And do the same in development system of EHP 5.
If you find any problem you can post the issue in Portal.
That will be easy for all to help you.
Hope you got my point.

Similar Messages

Intercompany stock transfer - Item not relevant for billing

Hi Experts,
please can you help me in Intercompany stock transfer billing. I set up all customizing for Intercompany stock transfer, checking also with all OSS notes available.
When I try to invoice Stock Transfer Delivery (created from Stock Transfer Purchase Order) with VF01, system issues the message "F044 The item is not relevant for billing".
As per standard setting, billing relevance on Stock Transfer Delivery item category is "D".
Thank you very much
Kind Regards
Andrea

Check your copying control setting for Delv to Billing in VTFL (LF - IV)
Header:
Copying requirements - 014 - Hdr dlv.rel.IC bill.
Item:
Copying requirements - 015 - Itm dlv.rel.IC bill.
Data VBRK/VBRP - 001- Inv.split (sample)
Also, check for your I Cat that has billing indicator is active.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Billing status in delivery not updated for free-of-charge flow

Hi,
I have a free-of-charge flow: sales order-delivery-invoice. The invoice has the net value 0 and do not goes in accounting. The problem is that the billing status in delivery is still "not invoiced" and because of this i can make more invoices for the same delivery/qty. Why the status in not updated? The item categ is relevant for billing (A).
Thanks.

You can refer SAP Note 33258 - Processing free-of-charge items.
Where they talk about Item cat setting, use of Cond Type R100.
Regards
JP

Derivation Strategy for billing types - Post activation in KE4W

Dear Friends,
I recently activated KE4W for billing types S2, Credit Notes & Debit notes.
This is for restricting the COGS flow to CO for these billing types.
Now when i am releasing the sales document to accounting - Its asking to maintain derivation strategy.... KEDR for all the billing types.
From my previous implementations i have never maintained KEDR for billing types... as it is suppose to be on a standard derivation strategy.
How can i go about resolving this.
Do i at all need to maintain KEDR for billing types.. or is this error because of something else..
Thanks in advance
Vikrant Sood.

HI,
normally KE4W (reset CO-PA value fields) does not require any KEDR-steps.
I suggest to make a test derivation within KEDR to identify the step(s) where the message occurs.
Maybe also T-Code KECM is helpful (Overview of derivation, characteristic derivation) to see if the billing type is used as a key field,...
Best regards, Christian

Deliveries Showing as 'not relevant for billing' after Invoice Cancellation

Hi,
We have a plants abroad scenario, where the billing document (plants abroad invoice) had to be cancelled because of wrong profit centres. After correction of data, when we are trying to invoice these deliveries, the system shows these as 'not relevant for billing'. Any idea what could have caused this and/ or how to correct this?
Thanks in advance for the help,
Regards,
alok

HI Alok,
Could you please recheck the delivery document flow again, its only Billing document is cancelled or PGI reversal is also done or not.
As per my knowledge G/L correction is nothing to do with 'not relevant for billing' or "relevant for billing".
Try again there might be a case where delivery might have been reversed or billing document has not been cancelled or Document might have been blocked.
Regards,
Nagesh

Document is not relevant for billing

Dear All,
We are implementing ECC 6 in one of our client.
Our client manufacturer of x finished product, they want monitor the production process through Project system and deliver should be through project system,
We did the complete configuration from Production order till delivery in PS is working fine.
But when we try to post billing document from the delivery document, the system is showing the following error,
Document is not relevant for billing: LP is not relevant for F2.
Our doubt is in this process, whether excise invoice will be generated or not?
this LP is hard coded in SAP, We are unable to rectify the error,
our GO-LIVE date is 1st March
can any one help us to solve this issue?
Thanks in advance
regards
Elango

LP is not relevant for F2
What is LP ?? Is it Delivery type or Item Category ?? Nevertheless, copy control is missing in VTFL.
whether excise invoice will be generated or not?
If physical material movement is there from a manufacturing plant to outside, then definitely, you should generate an excise invoice
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Copa document for free of charge orders not relevant for billing

Hi all,
when we create the shipment costs of the samples goods the systems give us this error: ME083 "Entre Profit. segment".
The mistake is related to the missing profitability segment in the sales order of samples goods there are not valid for the billing.
How can we generate a profitability segment for free of charge sales orders not relevant for the billings?
The Item Category is not relevant for the billing and we can't modify it.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards.
Matteo

Hi Sanil,
unfortunatly we can't create the billing. Due to fiscal requirements only sales orders and delivery exist.
We can't generate an invoice even with zero value.
The SD item category is not relevant for billing, so in the sales order no profitability segment is generated.
This is the standard functionalty of SAP, but we need to generate a profitability segment in the sales order because the shipment cost need it (transportation module of SAP).
All the other SD flow (sales orders with invoices) run already well.
Thanks
Matteo

Special G/L transactions not defined for bills/exch.and down pmnts ERROR

Dear Experts,
I am trying to park document via F-63 - Invoice Parking - General to park down payments made to vendor using following details in initial screen for F-63:
Posting Key_____29
Account number _1000
SGL Ind ________A
after pressing enter key the system prompt error message that is:
Special G/L transactions not defined for bills/exch.and down pmnts
Message no. FP030
Diagnosis
You have selected a posting key with a special G/L indicator of type 'Bill of exchange', or 'Down payment'. Document parking is not defined for special G/L transactions of the type 'Bill of exchange' or 'Down payment'.
System Response
Document parking cannot be carried out.
Procedure
Select a different posting key or special G/L indicator. If the posting is a 'One-time posting' to a rent contract, select a different transaction type or post the document directly.
HOW CAN I PARK DOWN PAYMENT DOCUMENT FOR VENDOR. KINDLY PROVIDE SUITABLE SOLUTION.
REGARDS

Dear,
Your special G/L "A" is set as Down Payment/Down Payment request, this is what cause the error.
To meet your requirement just go to FBKP select special G/L "A" enter your chart of accounts and go into properties, change
Special G/L transaction types to Others from Payment/Down payment request.
Advances can be created as Special G/L transaction types Others
If parking is utmost required by you then according to me you should create two special G/L for Down Payment. New created should be used for parking and default by SAP you can use with functionality like F-47, F-48, F-54.
System is stopping you because down payment functionality is provided exhaustively in SAP so you should follow that.
Please analyze the process exhaustively and implement to smoothen your process.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi.

Automatic clearing for Billing Reversal not working because of SPL 90

Hi all experts,
We recently implemented the Grants management module and SPL 90 is now active.
We are now having a problem with automatic clearing for billing reversals.
When I go to VF11 and try to reverse a document, the FI postings and FM postings seem to be happening. But the automatic reversal does not go all the way through because when it tries to post to special purpose ledger 90, it does not find the original document there and hence, stops.
Can someone tell me how to fix this?
Thanks a lot, in advance.
AJ

Can someone PLEASE look into this question?
I really appreciate your feedback.
Thanks.
A

Intercompany sales/billing - trading partner functionality

Hi Guys,
I understand the theory of trading partner.
But if anyone can give me an example (accounting entries) of trading partner in intercompany sales/billing..that would be very helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
MS

Hi Roman,
As you said, trading partner functionality in SAP is an excellent tool for inter-company transactions and elimination of intercompany payables and receivables for consolidation purposes.
1. The pieces of configuration / master data maintenance you need are:
a. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Enterprise Structure -> Definition -> Financial Accounting -> Define Company (OX15)
b. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Financial Accounting -> Assign company code to company (OX16)
c. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings -> Document -> Document Header -> Define Document Types (OBA7) - Here, for document types you want to use for inter-company postings, you may want to check the checkboxes 'Inter-company postgs' and/or 'Enter trading partner'. Read the SAP Help Documentation on these fields (press F1 when on the field).
d. Create your sister concerns as customers and vendors (preferably under an account group different from your external customers/vendors) and specify the Company you have created in (a) above in the Trading Partner field of Control data tab.
e. Enter Trading Partner in relevant G/L accounts (FS00) in Type/Description tab -> 'Consolidation data in chart of accounts' section.
f. Consider substitution rules (OBBH) for substituting Trading Partner in required transactions.
2. Things to consider for implementing the Trading Partner functionality for entities already performing day to day transactions on SAP.
I am not pretty sure about this, but I guess it is better to go for the change after you end a fiscal year and from the beginning of the next.
3. I think it is better to enable this functionality for everyone on SAP at once.
Good luck!
Srikanth

SD Billing - EPCG & Advance License

Guys,
Hi,
Points will be given for all relevant / close answers.
We are planning for a development for EPCG and Advance License tracking. but, these two numbers have to be mentioned in sD Billing.
Can you suggest any user exit or any field exit to capture these details in SD Billing?
Has anyone done this before, pl throw some light.
regards,
rahul asai

Dear rahul
Yes as for as exports from India is concerned, SAP has not addressed the requirement of export obligations. Government incentives to Indian exporters like Advance Licence, EPCG, Drawback etc., are all have to be developed on our own.
While developing, you can take into consideration the following to add new fields
For Advance Licence
- Licence Type
- Licence Number
- Issue Date
- Validity period
- Export Item
- Obligation quantity
- Import components
- Export value
For EPCG
- Licence Type
- Licence Number
- Issue Date
- Validity period
- Obligation period
- Obligation amount in Local currency
- Obligation amount in Foreign currency
- Type of EPCG Licence
- Item exported
- Asset Number
- po ref
- Plant to which the machinery would be imported
Once you develop fields for maintaining the above basic datas, you can tell the ABAPer the logic as follows
For Advance Licence
Whenever export invoice is generated for an item which is maintained in Advance Licence, for print out, it has to fetch the text (as prescribed by the Government) from the above area and also based on the billing quantity, it should cumulate and ensure that the billing quantity should not exceed over and above the obligation quantity.
For EPCG
But for EPCG, the above condition is not applicable. You can define a logic that if any of the items generated in billing is maintained in EPCG licence, the respective text (may be you can hard code this) should flow to invoice.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Billing in advance

Hi dear all,
I have a problem with a billing in advance order. A staff member of the sales department created the invoice (Proforma invoice for Delivery xxxxxxxxxx) in a wrong way. She handled it like a normal order. To make this possible she deleted the Material in the order and readded this material afterwards. After that it was possible to generate the Proforma invoice for delivery. But it seems that the reference to the contract has been lost.
The order is in the document flow of the contract, but there appears no delivery or other documents attached to the billing in advance order in the flow of the contract.
If we check directly in the order, the contract appears and the proforma invoice !!!
The problem is that the amount of the delivery is not subtracted from the amount of the contract. So there is a difference of the amount concerning the contract between us and the customer.
The sales department donu2019t want to cancel the following documents, because then it will be generated a credit note and the financial balance is after that incorrect.
Do you know how we can correct that?
I hope you understand the problem the way I explained.

"If we check directly in the order, the contract appears and the proforma invoice !!!"
This is the standard behaviour of referencing.
The sales department donu2019t want to cancel the following documents, because then it will be generated a credit note and the financial balance is after that incorrect.
If this is proforma invoice, there shouldn't be any accounting document. Please check. Just ignore this invoice and wait for time to bill original.
Manually complete the contract order if required.

Intercompany return billing problem

Hi experts
I met a question for intercompany return billing, in VF01, when I chose seletion list, it only list the batch split item with open quantity, it's ok to invoice here.
but when I invoice to customers, the main item didn't appear, it only has the batch split quantity as billed quantity. so no way to invoice customers.
any one can help me to solve this problem?
thanks in advance
elly

Hi,
Kindly check in copy control setting for the item category and if the billing quantity is {which is most probably at this moment for your setting} [ G ] then you will have to change it to [ H ].
Important to note that if you are using the standard F2 billing type and LF delivery type and TAN as item category then it is not advisable to change the Standard SAP settings at all.
Let me know on the same.
Hrishi

Detilas about invoice and billing in sd-flow

hi please send details about the invoice and billing in sd-flow.

procedure step wise for revenue recognition
Please try to avoid asking "step by step". First you have to take some efforts to search the forum to find out whether your query has already been answered. Next to implement revenue recognition, you need to seek the permission from SAP.
G. Lakshmipathi

* Values for Billing QTY in a Report

Dear SDN,
I am getting some values for Billing Qty as star (*)...in a Credit memos Report (SD)..
I am using 0SD_C03 InfoCube..
I have checked in the PSA also.. Data is available... Some value should come...but * is coming
Help will be greatly appreciated with points..
Thanks in advance...

Thanks...
But after doing the same way .. i am not getting any Units...
Not getting * but values are ok...But without any units
But Now client may ask to me..How to identify which are expressed in NO and TO and KG...
Please help me out to resolve it
Indeed, Thanks a lot for your help...

"intercompany for billing in advance" flow to implement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for