Internal Email recipient Status: 400 4.4.7 Message delayed, too many concurrent deliveries of this message at this time

Hi All,
I've read the other threads on this but not found one exactly like it. We are running Exchange 2010 SP3 Update 1. We recently sent out an internal email to a distribution that had a couple of dynamic DL's in it and a few regular DL's. 
A lot of people got the initial email and others didn't until the following day. There was around 3000 or so users in that group. When investigating it with the message tracking log, a lot of users had "400 4.4.7 Message delayed, too many concurrent
deliveries of this message at this time" for the status.
Could this be to do with message throttling? I can find very little information on this on the Internet.
Thanks in advance,
Chris

This is not throttling.
How many HT servers do you have? What is the name of queue they all are residing? 
Cheers,
Gulab Prasad
Technology Consultant
Thanks for your response Gulab,
I have two HT servers and I'm not sure what queue they were residing in as they eventually all went through. Is there any way I can tell this with the message tracking logs?
Thanks again,
Chris

Similar Messages

  • Internal Emails not being delivered to Mobile Devices or Delayed.

    Hi There!
    We have a customer running GW2012 SP2 and Mobility 1.2.5 and they have recently reported internal emails are delayed or not arriving to mobile devices.
    How would I start troubleshooting an issue like that please?

    Hi,
    This TID may be of some use to get you started with troubleshooting: http://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=7013038
    Let us know how it goes.
    Cheers,

  • Order output send with attachment to external email recipient

    Hello,
    We have a requirement that we should be able to send an email with an orderconfirmation attached (like BA00) to specific contact persons (maybe one, maybe multiple contact persons) But this should be not the email in the customer master general data. This email is not internal, we need to send external emails with the document attached (PDF).
    Also this requirement should be also for invoices (RD00), it could be that this is an other person than the contact person for the order confirmation.
    Our first thought was to use the contact persons and create 2 new entries, order confirmation recipient and invoice recipient. In this contact person we can add an e-mail address .
    First, we created a condition record for output BA00 in VV12. We use standard communication strategy CS01 and with partner function CP (Contact Person) and add the number of the contact person (which is found in customer master).
    Only then we get the following messages:
    Message no. AM016
    Please enter an address number     
    Message no. SVN000
    Communication type  cannot be used
    Ok, this is due to that CP is missing in partner functions, so we add this then the output is send to the contact person. This is fine and working.
    But the problem is that we want to have this for multiple recipients, so for example 2 contact persons. You cannot create the same condition record for two recipients, so you can leave the partner empty in VV12. But when you enter an order, you get a popup for which CP you want to create this order. So only one is possible.
    Now we saw that there is a partner function MA (Mail partner address) is available. I have looked and searched but cannot find the exact function of this partner function. Like the MP (Mail partner) is internal, I expect this one to be external mail.
    But the only problem is with this partner function, we cannot add this to the partner determination for customer master.
    So how are we able to set this up? Any suggestion is appreciated and when usable also awarded.

    Read note 191470 - Purchase order as an e-mail.pdf

  • Exchange 2010 - Getting report on local internal email

    Hi,
    I am trying t get one particular stat out of my Exchange 2010 server using Powershell and could use some help.  I simply want the total number of emails sent internally within my single exchange server. 
    Below is the Powershell command I have tried.
    get-messagetrackinglog -ResultSize unlimited -Start “05/14/2013 00:00:00″ -End “06/10/2013 23:59:00″ | where {$_.Sender -like “*@domain.com“} | where {$_.Recipients -like “*@domain.com“} > “C:\internalmail.txt
    The internalmail.txt file is empty.  I have made a couple attempts to get this information from the messagetrackinglog, but haven't gotten any results.  I was able to get the total number of RECEIVED and SENT emails from and to external addresses,
    but nothing internal.
    Does the messagetrackinglog keep a record of internal emails within the Exchange server?
    Thanks for any help you can give.
    Terry

    Your command should work, but there's no need for a double 'where{}' and using ">file.txt" makes a not so useful file:
    get-messagetrackinglog -ResultSize unlimited -Start “06/10/2013 00:00:00" -End “06/10/2013 00:59:00" | where {$_.Sender -like “*@rotterdam.nl“ -AND $_.Recipients -like “*@rotterdam.nl“} > “C:\internalmail.txt"
    Also, you did not specify a server, so you will have to run this command on a transportserver and it will only return results from that perticular server.
    Try the following:
    get-transportserver| get-messagetrackinglog -ResultSize unlimited -Start $(get-date).addhours(-1) -End $(get-date) | where {$_.Sender -like "*@org.nl" -AND $_.Recipients -like "*@org.nl"} | select EventId,Source,Sender,@{name="Recipient";expression={[system.String]::Join(";",$_.Recipients)}},MessageSubject| export-csv -noTypeInformation "C:\internalmail.txt"
    you should be able to run it from any of you servers and it should get you the logs from all transport servers over the last hour. I've used $(get-date) here to see if it is an issue with your date format (it uses locale settings, an "issue" that
    has been fixed in Exch 2010).
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997573(v=exchg.80).aspx
    End
    Optional
    System.DateTime
    This parameter returns message tracking log entries up to, but not including, the specified End date and time byusing the regional format of the
    computer on which the cmdlet is run.
    (you can expect an error on edge server query ... ignore these)

  • Outlook 2010 - "Reply To" linking to wrong Exchange 2010 Internal Email Address

    Hi,
    One of my internal email users (Exchange 2010 Enterprise) compiled an email from within Outlook 2010 and sent it to a specific internal colleague with a CC to two other internal colleagues plus two external contacts.
    They all recieve the email successfully but if any of them (internal & external contacts) try to "Reply" or "Reply All" the "To" for the new email is automatically populated with a completely different and unrelated
    internal email account instead of that of the original sender? This occurs when attempted from either thier Outlook or OWA environments.
    This appears to be a one off issue, as the original recipient of the problem email has recieved other emails from the same sender both just before and soon after which all behave correctly.
    I have looked at the View Source information for the recieved and confused email from Outlooks perspective and there is no reference within the source to the wrong account that get consistantly used for the
    purposes of a Reply.
    I have never experienced this sort of problem before since administering Exhange etc and would like to understand how it can randonly occur.
    Any help would be most welcome.
    Regards,
    Mark

    Hi,
    Does this issue happen to other emails or just the certain one?
    On the sender side, please go to Send Items folder, find and open the problematic message. Click on File > Properties and check if the user set “Have replies sent to” in the Delivery options section:
    If the original email was set with this option, when we click Reply, it will send email to the people typed in the box.
    We can also check the message properties on the recipient side.
    Please let me know the result.
    Regards,
    Steve Fan
    TechNet Community Support

  • Internal email delivery taking very long time (EMAIL WITH attachment sent to large distribution group)

    Hi Fellows
    I am facing an issue with Exchange 2010 SP3 (14.03.0123.003) environment. Internal email sent with attachment to an all employee or large-member distribution group chokes the queue on Hub Transport and takes from 7 to 15 minutes to deliver. during this
    time period users's emails are also delayed because of transport queue. I am trying to diagnose the root cause for this. Your suggessions and insight might be helpful for me to get it over quickly.
    2 x HT + CAS (WNLB)
    2 x MBX (DAG)
    UserBase: 5000+
    Regards.
    J.A

    Hi,
    Generally, a message that has a large attachment or many recipients takes longer for a Hub Transport server to process than a small message that's addressed to only one recipient.
    In Exchange 2010, after a message is received by the Hub Transport server, the message is added to the Submission queue. Messages move from the Submission queue through the categorizer. When the message is categorized, a recipient's e-mail
    address is resolved to an object in Active Directory. This query determines the mailbox associated with that e-mail address and which Mailbox server is hosting that mailbox.
    For more information about Internal message Routing, please refer to the following link.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb232193(v=exchg.141).aspx
    In addition, Slow network bandwidth will effect email delivery. We can increase the network bandwidth to take a test. Low computer performance will also affect the delivery. If sending internal email without attachment to all employee or
    large-member distribution group, will they take the same long time to deliver?
    Best Regards.

  • "The request failed with HTTP Status 400: Bad Request." when running reports

    Hi,
    I installed reporting services and the install went fine.  The Reporting Services are located on a different server.  I can see all the reports in SCCM but when I try to run them I get the "400" error with the following details:
    System.Net.WebException
    The request failed with HTTP status 400: Bad Request.
    Stack Trace:
       at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.ReadResponse(SoapClientMessage message, WebResponse response, Stream responseStream, Boolean asyncCall)
       at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] parameters)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.Internal.Soap.ReportingServices2005.Execution.ReportExecutionService.LoadReport2(String Report, String HistoryID)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.Internal.Soap.ReportingServices2005.Execution.RSExecutionConnection.<>c__DisplayClass2.<LoadReport>b__0()
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.Internal.Soap.ReportingServices2005.Execution.RSExecutionConnection.ProxyMethodInvocation.Execute[TReturn](RSExecutionConnection connection, ProxyMethod`1 initialMethod, ProxyMethod`1 retryMethod)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.Internal.Soap.ReportingServices2005.Execution.RSExecutionConnection.LoadReport(String Report, String HistoryID)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ServerReport.EnsureExecutionSession()
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ServerReport.SetParameters(IEnumerable`1 parameters)
       at Microsoft.ConfigurationManagement.AdminConsole.SrsReporting.ReportViewerWindowsForms.SetParameterValues_DoWork(Object sender, DoWorkEventArgs e)
    I can open the URL from the SCCM server but when I select a report I am unable to select any report options if available.  If no options are availble the report just doesn't run,  I don't get and error if I select "View Report" mutiple
    times.
    If I connect to the Reporting Services site on the computer where it is installed all the reports run fine.
    One thing I have noticed is that when I try to change or add a role assignment for Reporting Services the edited account always reverts back to the default settings and the added Domain user is dropped.
    Thanks

    I reviewed the topic and found a couple of steps I missed the first time around.  I had to "Configure Reports to Use Report Builder 3.0 and setting the "Log on Locally" permission. 
    I then uninstalled the role and reinstalled it.  I am still getting the 400 error.
    When I inspected the SmsAdminUI.log I noticed the Error on the last line 2151811598 (it repeats in the log).  I couldn't find anything specific related to it.  By reading a few "related" Internet posts I came accross a intial setup
    blog that noted some WMI firewall execptions (Async-in, DCOM-in and WMI-in) as require so I checked and they were not allowed on the SCCM server so I allowed them and tested with the same result.  I turned them off again. 
    Here is the tail end of the SmsAdminUI.log
    [19, PID:2684][01/24/2013 16:08:29] :[ReportProxy] - User-specified default Reporting Point [INC-SQL42.deccoinc.net] could not be found, [] is now the default Reporting Point.
    [4, PID:2684][01/24/2013 16:08:30] :[ReportProxy] - User-specified default Reporting Point [INC-SQL42.deccoinc.net] could not be found, [] is now the default Reporting Point.
    [15, PID:2684][01/24/2013 16:08:30] :[ReportProxy] - User-specified default Reporting Point [INC-SQL42.deccoinc.net] could not be found, [] is now the default Reporting Point.
    [1, PID:2684][01/24/2013 19:06:02] :System.Management.ManagementException\r\nNot found \r\n   at System.Management.ManagementException.ThrowWithExtendedInfo(ManagementStatus errorCode)
       at System.Management.ManagementObject.Initialize(Boolean getObject)
       at System.Management.ManagementBaseObject.get_wbemObject()
       at System.Management.PropertyData.RefreshPropertyInfo()
       at System.Management.PropertyDataCollection.get_Item(String propertyName)
       at System.Management.ManagementBaseObject.GetPropertyValue(String propertyName)
       at System.Management.ManagementBaseObject.get_Item(String propertyName)
       at Microsoft.ConfigurationManagement.ManagementProvider.WqlQueryEngine.WqlConnectionManager.GetInstance(String objectPath)\r\nManagementException details:
    instance of SMS_ExtendedStatus
     Description = "Error retrieving object FileType=2";
     ErrorCode = 2151811598;
     File = "e:\\nts_sccm_release\\sms\\siteserver\\sdk_provider\\smsprov\\SspInterface.h";
     Line = 1208;
     Operation = "GetObject";
     ParameterInfo = "SMS_SCI_SysResUse.FileType=2,ItemName=\"[\\\"Display=\\\\\\\\INC-SQL42.deccoinc.net\\\\\\\"]MSWNET:[\\\"SMS_SITE=INC\\\"]\\\\\\\\INC-SQL42.deccoinc.net\\\\,SMS SRS Reporting Point\",ItemType=\"System Resource Usage\",SiteCode=\"INC\"";
     ProviderName = "ExtnProv";
     StatusCode = 2147749890;
    \r\n
    [1, PID:2684][01/24/2013 23:39:14] :System.NullReferenceException\r\nObject reference not set to an instance of an object.\r\n   at Microsoft.ConfigurationManagement.AdminConsole.SmsCustomDialog.get_LocaleIndependentIdentifier()
       at Microsoft.ConfigurationManagement.AdminConsole.ShowDialogTaskHandler.DoTask(NavigationModelNodeBase node, SccmTaskConfiguration sccmTask, PropertyDataUpdated dataUpdatedDelegate, Boolean readOnly)\r\n
    [1, PID:5008][01/25/2013 20:48:00] :System.Management.ManagementException\r\nNot found \r\n   at System.Management.ManagementException.ThrowWithExtendedInfo(ManagementStatus errorCode)
       at System.Management.ManagementObject.Initialize(Boolean getObject)
       at System.Management.ManagementBaseObject.get_wbemObject()
       at System.Management.PropertyData.RefreshPropertyInfo()
       at System.Management.PropertyDataCollection.get_Item(String propertyName)
       at System.Management.ManagementBaseObject.GetPropertyValue(String propertyName)
       at System.Management.ManagementBaseObject.get_Item(String propertyName)
       at Microsoft.ConfigurationManagement.ManagementProvider.WqlQueryEngine.WqlConnectionManager.GetInstance(String objectPath)\r\nManagementException details:
    instance of SMS_ExtendedStatus
     Description = "Error retrieving object FileType=2";
     ErrorCode = 2151811598;
     File = "e:\\nts_sccm_release\\sms\\siteserver\\sdk_provider\\smsprov\\SspInterface.h";
     Line = 1208;
     Operation = "GetObject";
     ParameterInfo = "SMS_SCI_SysResUse.FileType=2,ItemName=\"[\\\"Display=\\\\\\\\INC-SQL42.deccoinc.net\\\\\\\"]MSWNET:[\\\"SMS_SITE=INC\\\"]\\\\\\\\INC-SQL42.deccoinc.net\\\\,SMS SRS Reporting Point\",ItemType=\"System Resource Usage\",SiteCode=\"INC\"";
     ProviderName = "ExtnProv";
     StatusCode = 2147749890;
    \r\n

  • GetItemsRequest failed with HTTP status 400

    At one of our customers we've got a strange error.
    The Login/Logout request works fine, but the getItemsRequest fails with status 400.
    Here is the soap request:
    ------- SoapRequest at 13:29:22 -------
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
    <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><soap:Header><session xmlns="http://schemas.novell.com/2005/01/GroupWise/types">BbOOBFebTkAxSffn</session></soap:Header><soap:Body><getItemsRequest xmlns="http://schemas.novell.com/2005/01/GroupWise/methods"><view>default id container @type message subject startDate endDate attachments recipients status</view><filter><element xsi:type="FilterGroup" xmlns="http://schemas.novell.com/2005/01/GroupWise/types"><op>and</op><element xsi:type="FilterEntry"><op>contains</op><field>subject</field><value>*</value></element></element></filter><items><item xmlns="http://schemas.novell.com/2005/01/GroupWise/types">4ECE5BEE.GWDOMNM.GWPOSTNM.100.1333466.1.16E BA.1</item></items><count>-1</count></getItemsRequest></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
    POA is 8.0.2, any suggestions?

    There is not enough information.
    You could check the POA log file.
    You can turn on logging the soap requests in the POA log file
    to see if that shows the error around the time on the soap
    request.
    If you get an 8.0.x build after 98083, we put the engine
    error in an HTTP header line:
    X-GWError-Code: xxxx
    Preston
    >>> On Wednesday, January 04, 2012 at 6:26 AM,
    hkunze<[email protected]> wrote:
    > At one of our customers we've got a strange error.
    > The Login/Logout request works fine, but the getItemsRequest fails with
    > status 400.
    >
    > Here is the soap request:
    >
    > ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑ SoapRequest at 13:29:22 ‑‑‑‑‑‑‑
    >
    > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf‑8"?>
    > <soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
    > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema‑instance"
    > xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><soap:Header><session
    > xmlns="http://schemas.novell.com/2005/01/GroupWise/types">BbOOBFebTkAxSff
    > n</session></soap:Header><soap:Body><getItemsRequest
    > xmlns="http://schemas.novell.com/2005/01/GroupWise/methods"><view>default
    > id container @type message subject startDate endDate attachments
    > recipients status</view><filter><element xsi:type="FilterGroup"
    >
    xmlns="http://schemas.novell.com/2005/01/GroupWise/types"><op>and</op><eleme
    nt
    >
    xsi:type="FilterEntry"><op>contains</op><field>subject</field><value>*</valu
    e></elemen
    > t></element></filter><items><item
    > xmlns="http://schemas.novell.com/2005/01/GroupWise/types">4ECE5BEE.GWDOMN
    >
    M.GWPOSTNM.100.1333466.1.16EBA.1</item></items><count>‑1</count></getItems
    Request></s
    > oap:Body></soap:Envelope>
    >
    > POA is 8.0.2, any suggestions?

  • Recipient Status 550 #5.1.0 Failures on Automatic Replies Only

    I have a strange issue with regard to at least one of my users auto reply's.  This user is able to communicate with a particular client via normal emails without issue, but when she sets her Out of Office Assistant her auto reply's get bounced back
    with the following Recipient Status: "550 #5.1.0 Rejected by bounce verification."   This only seems to happen with a few domains.  Is this an issue on the target side, or do I have some configuration issue to look into?  At first
    I thought it was on their end, but since I can see it happening with more than one recipient at different domains I'm questioning my config.   

    Hi MoltenArrow,
    From your description, you can configure the third party Spam AV/Smart host to accept messages with empty return path for troubleshooting.
    What's more, I recommend you use Test E-mail AutoConfiguration to check AutoDiscover on your problematic user's Outlook and normal user's. Compare the two result and check if there are any difference.
    If the issue persists, please move the problematic user's mailbox to another database and see the result.
    Here are some threads for your reference.
    Auto Reply - OOO Not working - MS Exchange 2010
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/93edc530-2bb3-4036-a5d5-e7cfb51fc6fd/auto-reply-ooo-not-working-ms-exchange-2010
    Auto Replies (Out of Office) not working - Exchange 2010 with Autodiscover running properly
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/exchange/en-US/0cdd8ef4-f66e-491c-8c39-6790f0814f59/auto-replies-out-of-office-not-working-exchange-2010-with-autodiscover-running-properly
    Hope it helps.
    If there are any problems, please feel free to let me know.
    Best regards,
    Amy
    Amy Wang
    TechNet Community Support
    HI Amy,
    Thank you for the options, but I'm not sure you understood my question, or I didn't present it well.  We're not having trouble receiving, but sending.  There's no third party application at play.  Autodiscover
    for this user is typical.  Their auto replies are going out to most  The message in the subject is the one that is returned, I'm assuming, by the target (external) server. 
    Lrok and Bobby,
    There is no NDR...  It just gets dropped.  That could be a function of our configuration as well, but I haven't confirmed that yet.  What I HAVE confirmed is that for ALL OOF replies the "Return-Path" header
    is set to "<>" which is consistent with the error message I'm seeing.  When a normal email is sent that header is populated with the sender's address. (I'm checking this from an external email system)  I've practiced some Google-Fu on this
    and it seems like that is the desired behavior since Exchange 2007 to prevent automated email storms, and is RFC compliant.  Can anyone confirm this?  **note: I'm using a single Exchange 2010 SP2 server with just a Hub transport, no Edge**
    As for the Transport rule, I tried creating one but it didn't seem to affect it.  I didn't restart the server though, is that required for it to take effect?  Furthermore, If I follow the links provided I get references for Transport Agents and
    Transport Rules, which I understand to be different things. Can anyone clarify that? Thanks!

  • Internal Email delay

    I have a person here in the office that is having issues with internal emails. She will get emails sent by someone in our office (same domain, same email domain) 1 to 2 days late. It doesn't appear to be specific from one sender but random. She is the only
    one out of about 100 people who are having this issue. I was able to send her an email and she got it right away so replicating the results is difficult, however she is getting 2 or more emails a day that are a day or so late. Does anyone have any ideas? Our
    setup is 2 exchange mailbox data base servers, two CAS servers and we are running Exchange 2010. The user with the problems is running Windows 7 with Outlook 2010.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I recommend you use message tracking to check if the message was delivered to the recipient with any delay.
    In addition, let the user disable the virus software on the client PC, and try to use outlook safe mode and online mode. Check if the issue still occur.
    Thanks.
    Niko Cheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • Email to distribution list from SAP Internal Email

    I have a scenario where in I have to send email from sap internal email (T-code:-SBWP) to the distribution list.
    Can some one give me some idea on the same .
    When we go to T-code: - SBWP, for unread email we right click and fwd the email to distribution list, can we achieve the same functionality by a program so that we can automate the process.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards,
    Pawan.

    Hi,
    Yes ,one can write an ABAP code to send the mail to a distribution list.
    Please try and use the Function Module 'SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_SEND_API1' and you need to pass the import and export parameters to this FM which needs to be defined and populated before you use this FM.
    The first Exporting parameter is 'document_data' which will be of type 'sodocchgi1'.In order to populate this, you can use the structure of type 'sodocchgi1' and give the name, description, sensitivity and the language by referring to the data type mentioned above('sodocchgi1').
    The next is the document type and you can mention any one of them from 'RAW' to anything again refering to the document type.
    The next are the tables parameters and the first one is "object_content" which would be of type "solisti1" and you need to populate this one as well.This table would contain the contents of the mail.
    The next Tables parameters is "receivers" which would be of type 'somlreci1' and in order to populate this,you need to use the below like code:
    smtp_addr = any valid email id.
          gi_recievers-receiver = smtp_addr.
          gi_recievers-rec_type = 'U'.
          gi_recievers-com_type = 'INT'.
          APPEND gi_recievers.
    once this is done, an email will be sent to the recipient which can be monitored in the T-code SCOT and SOST.It will take sometime for the mail to be sent as there is a fixed timeline after which the R/3 system pushes the mails through it to the recipients.
    I guess, I have tried to answer your question.
    In case of any queries,please let me know.
    Regards,
    Puneet Jhari.

  • C370 control between internal email domains

    Hi All,
    I have a customer where they have a few internal mail servers and the mail server’s email gateway are pointed to the C370 ironport.
    They have a special requirement where they would like to block certain users from one mail server to be communicating with a set of people in another mail server.
    They also have requirements like certain users can only send email to other certain users in another internal email domain.
    Example:
    a) [email protected] can only email [email protected]
    b) [email protected] cannot sent emails to [email protected]
    What I did is create mail policies for each requirement. For a) what I did is “allow from [email protected] to [email protected]”; then “deny [email protected] to any email domain”. As for b), what I did was “deny from [email protected] to [email protected]”; then “allow from [email protected] to any email domains”.
    My question is:
    1. Do I apply these policies on the incoming mail policies or outgoing? Taking into consideration I have a 2-data port topology where data-1 is configured to face the internet (public) and data-2 is facing the LAN (private)
    2. Will my mail policy work?
    Many thanks.

    Hi Andreas,
    Because I want to block [email protected] to send email to [email protected] only, I will have to define specific policies that drops [email protected] to [email protected], then allow [email protected] to every other email. Something like firewall rules performing specific deny and allow any any at the last line.
    I performed some internal testings and I realize that in order to specifically block from [email protected] to [email protected], I have to define sender = [email protected] in the outgoing mail policy and [email protected] in the outgoing mail filter under filter = envelope recipient; action = drop (or vice versa). Otherwise, if I place sender = [email protected] and recipient = [email protected] in the mail policy, any email from [email protected] OR to [email protected] will hit the policy.
    I feel that this is kind of brainless to do such thing and will add operational complexity. Unfortunately, my customer has a very strict security environment. I did say the same thing to him. "Why don't control on the server end?". He replied "what if my servers get compromised?"
    Hope you can understand my explanation Thanks.

  • Internal Email Recipients by Size report

    Hi,
    Is IronPort had "Internal Email Recipients/Senders by Size" report ?
    I see this information in Mail Flow Central reports, but not in IronPort reports....

    Hi,
    Thanks for the answer.
    I am looking for "Internal Email Senders/Recipients by Size" part of MFC Volume Report by User. See example below
    or page 64 of MFC 1.4 User Guide
    Is any way exist to add this information to IronPort reports ?
    Internal Email Recipients by Size
    Envelope Recipient Messages % Virus Positive % Spam Positive Total Message Size
    Virus Spam Positive Suspect Spam Total
    anatsh@*.*.* 0 0 0 44 0.0% 0.0% 77.06 (MB)
    iditm@*.*.* 0 4 0 13 0.0% 30.8% 34.98 (MB)
    tehilak@*.*.* 0 3 0 60 0.0% 5.0% 28.47 (MB)

  • Internal error: Recipient address not found.return code : 80

    Hi All,
    I am getting this this error in sost tcode.I am facing this tcode for the first time and hence have no idea.could any one suggest why this is coming and could be the solution for this ?
    Status      trans.met sender recipient send date send time  status text
    Red mark  via. inter.  john      -           27.08.08   15:45:00  internal error: Recipient address not  found.return   code : 80
    Need solution urgently.

    Not in SCOT, If you read carefully i said,
    setup the Relay Agent in your SMTP server
    For example if you use MS Exchange you need to do the config there... If you ask your Mail Admin he will know what you're talking about.
    Regards
    Juan

  • Service Desk Settings, Automatic Email at status change of messages

    Hello experts,
    I need your help about this:
    I am configuring Service Desk Specific Scenario Settings -> Automatic Email at status change.
    I made the configuration suggested as described SAP Note 691303. Also I configured the status profile SLFN0001 in transaction DNO_CUST01, and the Action profile SLFN0001_STANDARD, both  for the SLF1 (Service basis message), but still when we change the status of messages, the email is not generated in SCOT, overview of send orders.
    I want to clarify that the configuration made for the action of send email was in transsaction SPPFCADM, selected DNO_NOTIF, and push Define Action Profile and Actions, then selected the Action profile SLFN0001_STANDARD for making he ocnfiguration as suggested in note 691303.
    SCOT is correctly configured and working OK.
    Business partners emails are mantained too.
    Thank you very much.
    Hector Longarte

    Hello. Thanks to all of you for your comments. I am answering to your questions below:
    Have you assign proper partner function to every status in action?
    I do not know where can I make this assigment.  I am thinking that this may be the cause. Please I kindly ask you to give me orientation about this.
    Have you defined condition for defined action?
    Yes, the condition was defined thru SPPFCADM. Now, I wonder if this must be configured for CRM_ORDER application as described in note 691303, or for DNO_NOTIF ??
    Have you maintained user deatils on identification tab in BP?
    Yes, the Business partners and emails adresses were correctly mantained.
    The configuration we are talking about and you want to change, is it regarding SLFN (Service Desk Messages) or SLF1 (Basis Service Message)?
    I supose that for Service desk messages we must configure SLFN, and not SLF1. Right?
    In DNO_CUST01, we have SLF1. We have not made any configuration in DNO_CUST04, it is still as original standard. Please let me know if we are right.
    You want to send an aut. email notification when status of SLF1 changes?
    We want to send email notifications to the message creator about the status change of service desk messages.
    Thank you very much.
    Best regards.
    Hector Longarte.

Maybe you are looking for