Issue with Ravenna search

Hi all,
He have problem when using the search included in test portal in Site Studio (the Ravenna portal). After doing a search, we do not get any result, and Content Server logs file registers the following lines (see bellow)
Details of our environment:
- Stellent 10.1.3.3.1 (070511) over Windows XP (local test environment)
- DataBase: Oracle 10.2.0.1.0
- Search Engine: DATABASE.METADATA (no full-text search)
Thanks
Francis
LOGS:
Event generated by user 'sysadmin' at host 'localhost'. Referred to by http://localhost/RVH/SearchResults/index.htm?ssUserText=Ravenna.
User agent is Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; WinuE v6; WinuE v6) and request method is GET.
Query operator fulltext does not exist. Query operator fulltext does not exist. [ Details ]
An error has occurred. The stack trace below shows more information.
!csUserEventMessage,sysadmin,localhost!csFileServiceReferredToBy,http://localhost/RVH/SearchResults/index.htm?ssUserText=Ravenna!csFileServiceUserAgent,Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; WinuE v6; WinuE v6),GET!csSearchQueryOperatorNotExist,fulltext!csSearchQueryOperatorNotExist,fulltext
intradoc.common.ServiceException: !csSearchQueryOperatorNotExist,fulltext
     at intradoc.search.UniversalSearchQueryParser.parseQueryEx(Unknown Source)
     at intradoc.search.UniversalSearchQueryParser.parseQuery(Unknown Source)
     at intradoc.search.UniversalSearchQueryParser.parse(Unknown Source)
     at intradoc.search.DBSearchConfigCompanion.fixUpAndValidateQuery(Unknown Source)
     at intradoc.shared.CommonSearchConfig.fixUpAndValidateQuery(Unknown Source)
     at intradoc.server.SearchService.prepareLocalSearch(Unknown Source)
     at intradoc.server.SearchService.getSearchResults(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
(...)

The search feature of the Ravenna demo requires full text search.

Similar Messages

Issue with Google search on Safari

Hello: I am having the same issue with my iPad and iPhone 6. I think it may be related to iOS 8. when I was running iOS 7 whenever I would search for something in the Google search bar with and Safari the search bar would start to get suggestions what I may be searching for. For example if I would type in IT it would suggest that I was searching for the word Italy. Ever since I up dated to iOS 8 the suggest feature no longer works. I was wondering if this is an Apple issue and they will resolve it in a future iOS update or is there a problem with my settings. FYI in my Safari settings the default search is set to Google.
Thank you.

I have been having this same issue since the upgrade, and I cannot seem to fix it. I have restored, but iTunes won't let me revert back to pre 8.0/2.
Have not found any kind of resolution to this problem, and it doesn't seem to be a wide issue, as this is the only post I have seen on it.
Really annoying.

Issue With Similar Search Strings in EBS

Hi Everybody, I'm experiencing some issue regarding a Search String that I have, the config is very similar, the only difference between one and the other is that there's a specific posting rule for one particular account.
EG: Search String 1: (^)ACCOUNT TRANSFER TRSF TO( |$)
Search String 2:(^)ACCOUNT TRANSFER TRSF TO 1111111111( |$)
(Where 1111111111 is the bank account)
Same Extenral transaction, NTRF, Same house bank and account id. Same Comapny also
But when executing a Statement with the 1st one it works fine, but when runing the 2nd one it does not use any of them(it takes the Posting rule set for NTRF in the EBS configuration).
I've tested it in the SS test and it takes the right posting rule.
If you have any clue on this I'll really appreciate it.
Regards
Luciano

I apologize for the above and the thread has been posted here as I was unable to access the correct category due to some technical issues with Oracle forums. Also, the mentioned issue is in critical state and has a deadline so thought of posting to get it resolved as soon as possible. Specific categorization will be surely taken care in future.
Moving the thread to below location:
http://myforums.oracle.com/jive3/thread.jspa?threadID=1023776
Edited by: 931435 on Jun 6, 2012 12:25 AM

Issue with Formatted Search and Sales BOM

Good afternoon,
One of our customers uses a Formatted Search on the Sales Order row to lookup the Project Code stored against the Item.
This works very well, except for when a Sales BOM is selected. I assume the FS lookup is working correctly, but the screen is quickly refreshed to list all the component items related to the BOM. This process appears to overwrite the contents of the Project field.
We wish to keep this functionality, but retain the FS lookup results in the Project column. Could the order of the process be changed so that the BOM refresh occurs prior to the FS lookup.
Thanks
Greig
Edited by: Greig Burrows on Jul 21, 2010 5:57 PM

Hi,
For metadata, which metadata are you not seeing? Are they custom properties within the PDF, and have you checked if you have crawled properties matching these?
I know there's issue with last modified on PDF's (http://sharepointfieldnotes.blogspot.no/2013/05/understanding-and-getting-sharepoint.html)
Thanks,
Mikael Svenson
Search Enthusiast - SharePoint MVP/MCT/MCPD - If you find an answer useful, please up-vote it.
http://techmikael.blogspot.com/
Author of Working with FAST Search Server 2010 for SharePoint

Issues with PRC search

I'm having all kinds of fun with the PRC search API and I'm wondering if anyone else has experienced any of these issues. These two are the current thorns in my side:
1) IPortalSearchResult.getIconURL returns an incorrect image URL. My server (tomcat) is on http://bdg-solaris2:8080/portal/server.pt and my images (apache httpd) are on http://bdg-solaris2:8888/imageserver. Here's a sample URL coming back from getIconURL:
http://bdg-solaris2:8080/imageserver/plumtree/portal/public/img/icon_user.gif
It has the wrong port. Why?
2) IPortalSearchResult.getURL returns an empty string. Why? My current search is on users -- wouldn't it be appropriate to return the opener URL for the URL object or do I need to construct this myself?
Geez.
Chris Bucchere | bdg | [email protected] | http://www.bdg-online.com

Hi, Chris -
Yeah... I tell ya, I saw something like this and I kinda just bypassed it
1) Instead of using the getIconURL I just popped the output into an adaptive tag on the way out to draw the property. I do have a snippet of PRC search code at work that used this - I'll have to check when I get into the office. When I saw this it was goofier than your example - it was getting confused and mangling the URL for me in a different way. I chalked it up to my noobness at that point and didn't have time to mess with it. I'm curius - that config setting is contained somewhere and sent to the remote tier - I'll bet it's confused somewhere on the portal or WS API tier and passing this along. If you check the WS API logs, does it show what it "thinks" the right imageserver URL is?
2) Ditto-ish on this. I avoided the getURL altogether and just used the common opener link tag. I figured I had the object and class Ids, so... I just fed them into the tag.
I know that doesn't answer your question pe se, but maybe it's another option?
Thanks,
Eric

Issue with custom search fields in agent inbox

Hi All,
I am working on CRM agent inbox 7.0. The issue I am facing is like this:
I have added custom search fields in inbox. When give a combination of standard search field and custom search field, the result is only based on standard field. The value of custom field is not considered.
Is this a standard behaviour? Are standard fields given higher priority that custom fields?
Any pointers on this would be highly helpful.
Thanks,
Narendra

Hi Naren,
Did you add custom field using AET? If yes then while adding custom field using AET did you make it search and result relevant?
There is nothing like priority in standard SAP fields and custom fields.
Please let me know so that I can further help you.
Thanks,
Bhushan

[solved]Possible issue with forum search

This thread does not show up in a search for "xfce" in "Topic subject only".
Edit: apparently, all searches are "described" the same way, so nevermind the rest.
Also, the description for the search is
Topics with posts containing 'xfce'
which seems like a poor description for a search in "Topic subject only".
Topics containing 'xfce'
would be much more appropriate I think.
Last edited by alphaniner (2012-04-30 18:45:25)

alphaniner wrote:
There's a particular cruelty in Arch having a broken forum search function, as often as people are admonished for not STFF.
If the function is known to be bugged, wouldn't it be responsible to point that out somewhere, if not remove it entirely?
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Main_Page tels you that you can use Google search too. Such a note for the forum would be nice.

I have an issue with the search bar features

so the search bar changed recently and it's crap.. basically, it pops up way more information than needed as i'm typing in my search, and if my mouse happened to move over a random button when i hit "enter" it searches a different engine or goes to "change search settings".. these buttons do not need to be engaged with the enter button, it's really annoying.. in the screenshot picture i took it removed my cursor but you'll notice that "change search settings" is highlighted, if i were to press enter it wouldn't search, it would open settings

If you want to revert changes made to the search bar and have the standalone window to manage search engines then you can toggle this pref to false with a middle-click on the about:config page.
*browser.search.showOneOffButtons = false
Close and restart Firefox to make the change effective.
You can open the about:config page via the location/address bar.
You can accept the warning and click "I'll be careful" to continue.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/about:config

Performance issue with context search

We have a performance problem with a table tise with about 10 mio rows
and a text column tise_desc with short descriptions (about 300 characters per row).
We currently use mixed queries of the form (here very simple)
SELECT /*+ FIRST_ROWS(10) */ * FROM tise
WHERE reg_id = 'REGI0000000000000132'
AND contains(tise_desc, '(employment)' ) > 0
When the structured query part (here reg_id) and the fulltext part (contains) is not selective some queries take about 30 sec to 90 sec to process.
When we repeat the query it only takes about 1-3 sec (may be due to caching).
We are not interested in scoring nor in sorting the data.
Until now we have tried to use different hints, use different index types (btree versus bitmap), use different sql query syntax, use one fulltext index with xml and within syntax without any real progress.
Has any body addtional ideas?

Since you are doing a combination of structured queries and simple text queries on only one column, a ctxcat index with a catsearch may be better than a context index with a contains search. The catsearch has fewer additional features available than contains, but some context features can be done with catsearch through a query template. If you only do simple searches and don't need those extra features then it doesn't matter.
Make sure you have current statistics, so that the optimizer can use them to select the best execution plan.
Use bind variables instead of literal values in your searches. When you use bind variables, the previous query in the SGA can be reused for different variable values without reparsing, so that every query with new values has the same effect as rerunning the previous query. This alone could account for the different between 30 to 90 seconds on the first run and 1-3 seconds on the second run.
If you are not using scoring or sorting, then you might be better off without the first_rows hint, which chooses the best path for sorting. Try it both ways and see which works best for you.
Once you have tested with a ctxcat index, current statistics, and bind variables, if it is still slow you may be able to use some tracing to determine the cause of the slowness and adjust some memory settings or some such thing. You can find more tuning hints for Oracle Text here:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/text.111/b28303/aoptim.htm#i1007227
Please see the demonstration below that implements the recommendations above.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE TABLE tise
2    (reg_id        VARCHAR2 (20),
3      tise_desc VARCHAR2 (300))
4 /
Table created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> INSERT INTO tise VALUES ('REGI0000000000000132', 'employment')
2 /
1 row created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> INSERT INTO tise SELECT object_id, object_name FROM all_objects
2 /
68770 rows created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> -- try a ctxcat index instead of a context index
SCOTT@orcl_11g> -- (make sure the index is not fragmented by periodically
SCOTT@orcl_11g> -- dropping and recreating or altering and rebuilding or optimizing)
SCOTT@orcl_11g> BEGIN
2    CTX_DDL.CREATE_INDEX_SET ('tise_iset');
3    CTX_DDL.ADD_INDEX ('tise_iset', 'reg_id');
4 END;
5 /
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE INDEX tise_id_desc_idx ON tise (tise_desc)
2 INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CTXCAT
3 PARAMETERS ('INDEX SET tise_iset')
4 /
Index created.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> -- make sure you have current statistics:
SCOTT@orcl_11g> EXEC DBMS_STATS.GATHER_TABLE_STATS (USER, 'TISE')
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> -- use bind variables so that the query in the sga can be reused
SCOTT@orcl_11g> -- for different variable values without reparsing:
SCOTT@orcl_11g> VARIABLE search_reg_id VARCHAR2 (20)
SCOTT@orcl_11g> VARIABLE search_desc VARCHAR2 (2000)
SCOTT@orcl_11g> EXEC :search_reg_id := 'REGI0000000000000132'
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> EXEC :search_desc := 'employment'
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@orcl_11g> -- query using catsearch with a ctxcat index and bind variables:
SCOTT@orcl_11g> COLUMN tise_desc FORMAT A30 WORD_WRAPPED
SCOTT@orcl_11g> SET AUTOTRACE ON EXPLAIN
SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT *
2 FROM   tise
3 WHERE CATSEARCH (tise_desc, :search_desc, 'reg_id=''' || :search_reg_id || '''') > 0
4 /
REG_ID               TISE_DESC
REGI0000000000000132 employment
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 409728589
| Id | Operation                   | Name             | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT            |                  | 3439 |   100K|   102   (0)| 00:00:02 |
|   1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| TISE             | 3439 |   100K|   102   (0)| 00:00:02 |
|* 2 |   DOMAIN INDEX              | TISE_ID_DESC_IDX |       |       |            |          |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   2 - access("CTXSYS"."CATSEARCH"("TISE_DESC",:SEARCH_DESC,'reg_id='''||:SEARCH_REG_ID|
              |'''')>0)
SCOTT@orcl_11g> SET AUTOTRACE OFF
SCOTT@orcl_11g>

IOS 7.1 - Safari issues with Google search results

Since the latest upgrade to iOS on my iPhone 4, I'm have a problem with Safari. When I do a search on Google, the results webpage will not display the forward/back buttons with the change windows button. I have to close Safari, restart and then quickly hit the select window button before the search results display again. All other websites seem to be working fine. Anyone else experience this?

Negative. Try tapping toward the bottom of the screen and the navigation bar will show. You don't have to scroll to make that happen.

Urgent help - Issue with Search results in Web help (Robohelp10)

Hi,
I am facing an issue with the Search tab of my Web help output. The search is performed only on a part of the text entered.
For example, I search for a word "Planning", the results are generated for "plan".
I search for the word "Table", the results are generated for "Tabl"
I search for "corresponding", the results for "correspon" are displayed.
Is this an existing issue? Is there any fix for this.
Please help.

Hi there
This is the option Jeff was referring to. I see it in my own RoboHelp version 10. As we aren't seeing it in your screen capture, I'm wondering if this was an option that was added via a service release you haven't installed.
I do suppose another possibility would be that you are using RoboHelp for Word and perhaps that isn't an option with that application.
Cheers... Rick

Issue with Local Facets

ATG 10.0.1 on JBOSS.
We are facing issues with “Facetted Search Results” on local facets. It works perfectly fine for the Global Assets.
We have 4 global facets created that are applicable to all the sites/catalogs.
We have one local facet created for a Category. When I do the search(Category Search), I don’t get the results of the local facets. Am I missing something here. Is there any specific configuration to be done for local facets.
Murugesh

Folks, The issue got resolved.
If I use out of the box ATG configuration, I cannot have a “CategoryId” with a “_” in it. ATG uses “_” as the delimiter in the form handler. As our categoryId had an “_”, I had to change ATG to use a different delimiter.
Murugesh
#/atg/commerce/search/CustomCatalogCategoriesPropertyAccessor
delimiter=__

Issue with File Download(messageDownload) on Search Page.

Hi,
I created a custom OAF search page which fetches values from one table. The document in getting stored in my custom table in a BLOB colums and NOT in FND_LOBS.
The table has 3 collumns along with others:
1st is primary key (Record_Seq) ==> number data type
2nd to store actual file name (File1Name) ==> varcahar2 data type
3rd to store the actual uploaded data (File1Data) ==> BLOB data type
The reason for having the “File1Name” is so that I can display the original file name of the document that was uploaded, instead of just the “view” in the search page results .
On the File1Data BLOB and created a messageDownload for that under query results table with following details:
ID : File1Data
ItemStyle : messageDownload
FileMIME Type : pdf
Datatype : BLOB
View Instance : LacEmpExposureVO1
view Attribute : File1Name
File View Attribute : File1Data
When I click on the "File1Name" data hyperlink, it is opening only the first document corresponding to the first record in the search page results.
For example, If my search page returns 10 rows then when I click on the file1name on any row, It is open the first row file name only.
I have a primary key column(RECORD_SEQ) in the Table / EO / VO which is displayed in the search page results.
Also one weird thing is happening:
If I try to do this more than 2 times then it is opening the update page with the first record from the search page results…
I tried to print the context and it is nul the first time, But the second time then context is changing to "update". Dont know how this is happening????
Any advice is greatly appreciated as it is very crucial for me to get this resolved ASAP. I have looked at several forums and did a lot of things as advised in the forums . But nothing seems to work for me.
Thanks,
Mir
CO code for the search page
===========================
if (pageContext.getParameter("Create")!= null)
System.out.println("Into LacEmpExposureCO in PROCESS FORM REQUEST with Context of CREATE");
pageContext.setForwardURL
("OA.jsp?page=/lac/oracle/apps/lac/lacempexposure/webui/LacEmpExposureCreatePG",
null,
OAWebBeanConstants.KEEP_MENU_CONTEXT,
null,
null,
true, //Retain AM
OAWebBeanConstants.ADD_BREAD_CRUMB_YES,
OAWebBeanConstants.IGNORE_MESSAGES);
else if ("update".equals(pageContext.getParameter(EVENT_PARAM)))
System.out.println("Into LacEmpExposureCO in PROCESS FORM REQUEST with Context of UPDATE");
System.out.println("LacEmpExposureCO ==> RecordSeq in PROCESS FORM REQUEST is: " + RecordSeq);
HashMap params = new HashMap(1);
params.put("RecordSeq", RecordSeq);
pageContext.setForwardURL
("OA.jsp?page=/lac/oracle/apps/lac/lacempexposure/webui/LacEmpExposureUpdatePG",
null,
OAWebBeanConstants.KEEP_MENU_CONTEXT,
null,
params,
true, //Retain AM
OAWebBeanConstants.ADD_BREAD_CRUMB_NO, // Do not display breadcrumbs
OAWebBeanConstants.IGNORE_MESSAGES);
else {
String strEvent = pageContext.getParameter(OAWebBeanConstants.EVENT_PARAM);
System.out.println(strEvent);
System.out.println("Into the last ELSE part in LacEmpExposureCO.java");

Duplicate post -- Issue with File Download(messageDownload) on Search Page.

The browser back button is not working correctly when using the search funtion in ProBoards forums. Is there a known issue with ProBoards & FF?

I have submitted a bug report to ProBoards, but they cannot duplicate the problem I am having, so I am submitting this here in hopes you can find a solution.
At ProBoards Support and another PB forum while doing searches I found this problem, which continues with repeated testing over the past week or so:
url: http://support.proboards.com/search
1. enter perameters for the search (posts only by staff for the last 2 days)
2. choose one of those post results & click on it (choose a post on page 14 and not on page 1 of the results)
3. using the browser back button, attempt to return to the previous page of search results
4. rather than being taken back to the search results with my parameters, the search parameters have been removed and the page show 1000 results of posts by everybody.
I have tested this over and over again, disabling plugins, and nothing seems to alter the malfunctioning of the back button when I am doing this search function at ProBoards.
I have tested it in Internet Explorer and find that in IE the browser back button works properly with ProBoards searches. I always get the result I expect, so it's a problem with how FF interfaces with ProBoards, I think.

Many site issues can be caused by corrupt cookies or cache. In order to try to fix these problems, the first step is to clear both cookies and the cache.
Note: ''This will temporarily log you out of all sites you're logged in to.''
To clear cache and cookies do the following:
#Go to Firefox > History > Clear recent history or (if no Firefox button is shown) go to Tools > Clear recent history.
#Under "Time range to clear", select "Everything".
#Now, click the arrow next to Details to toggle the Details list active.
#From the details list, check ''Cache'' and ''Cookies'' and uncheck everything else.
#Now click the ''Clear now'' button.
Further information can be found in the [[Clear your cache, history and other personal information in Firefox]] article.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

Anyone else had issues with phone network being unavailable on iPhone 4 since updating to iOS 5.0.1? My iPhone 4 is continually searching for a network and does not find my provider. I swapped SIMs with another iPhone 4 on ios 4 to confirm device problem.

Has anyone else had issues with phone network being unavailable on iPhone 4 since updating to iOS 5.0.1? My iPhone 4 is continually searching for a network and does not find AT&T, my provider. I swapped SIM cards with another iPhone 4 running ios 4 and established this is a device problem, not a SIM card problem.

Does the device get any signal?
Sounds like the device may have had a hardware failure. If it is out of warranty, the only option is the Out of Warranty replacement.
AppleCare is only an option if it is still under the original warranty.

Issue with Ravenna search

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for