Long time  to render widescreen material ...

I'm sure this is a stupid question everyone and I tried my best to see if this has been posted before so I didn't have to bother you all with it but I couldn't see anything there.
I have a 2 hour play that was actually shot on a Sony Z1 (Widescreen SD,not HD) and when you download the footage into iMovie and then drag into the timeline it's there instantly. And of course had none of the dropped frame problems either. DVD did take 12 hours to burn instead of 8 so I don't know if that's the trade off.
But when the footage is downloaded into FCE 3.0 and you try and bring that into the timeline, not only do you have to have it rendered but it takes absolutely ages. Should this happen or am I going about it in the wrong way?
* I'm actually on 10.4.9 now and I have read the thread that says I should update to FCE 3.5 to address the dropped frames problem. I'll do that soon. Might that speed up the rendering process too?
Thanks for reading this and any advice will be appreciated.
Peter L

If you did that before your material was captured, then the material is OK. But if you didn't make a new sequence and used the default one that was in the browser it was probably DV NTSC 4:3. After you change the preset you have to make a new sequence.

Similar Messages

  • FCP Stuido 2 --- QT Reference takes long time to render HDV material

    Hi,
    another problem
    i captured several hours of HDV material, all single clips, now i have over 300 single files/clips.
    I edit all clips into a timeline (1 hour each long) then try to export as QT movie..i use a fresh system Mac Pro 8 Core FCP 6.0.1....i wonder because creating QT Refs take only a couple of seconds, now i wait 1 hour to export 1 hour as QT Ref...is this normal ? waste of time for me to wait so long...

    in my own experience, exportings as QT Reference simply doesn't work as efficiently when dealing with MPEG formats. the long export time reflects this poor efficiency

  • My final cut is running extremely slow after having for 6 months.  I use external hard drives and save nothing on my computer.  it takes a long time to render now. do you think something is wrong with computer. took it to mac store but they fail to help

    my final cut is running extremely slow after having for 6 months.  I use external hard drives and save nothing on my computer.  it takes a long time to render now. do you think something is wrong with computer. took it to mac store but they fail to help me.  I have a 13 inch mac book pro 10.6.8 8gb 2.3 gfz intel core i5

    What did Apple tell you about what they did (or did not) find here?
    See if working on the main disk is any faster.
    USB2 is glacial, as I/O interconnects go.  And USB2 disks have been known to fail, or sometimes to drop back to USB1 speeds, too.  FireWire 800 is substantially faster than USB2, but still not as fast as the internal drive connections can provide.
    Put another way, start varying your configuration, and see which configuration changes (still) have the problem, and which don't.

  • Screen takes a long time to render

    APEX 2.2 form with many regions displayed.
    One region is a matrix of about 10 columns and, potentially, hundreds of rows constructed using the HTMLDB_ITEM.HIDDEN, HTMLDB_ITEM.TEXTAREA, HTMLDB_ITEM.SELECT_LIST_FROM_LOV, HTMLDB_ITEM.TEXT and HTMLDB_ITEM.CHECKBOX functions.
    When there are few rows, the region displays very quickly. When there are 200-300 rows, the region can take 20-30 seconds to display.
    Running the same SQL in SQL*Plus for a 300 row region takes less than 0.5 secs.
    To try to isolate the problem I created two SQL regions, one above the below, the region taking the time.
    Running
    select to_char(systimestamp,'HH24:MI:SS:FF') time_mark
    from dual
    I got 16:05:32:007738 and 16:05:57:498557.
    The whole form is just under 1MB in size (when there are 300 rows in the large region). By monitoring the Windows task manager you can see the data getting transferred to IE in one rapid spike. The browser then takes a few seconds to display the form.
    Can anyone help to explain where the 20 -30 seconds is going?
    It seems to me that its either APEX itself or the AS (although the AS seems to be idle mostly)
    Can anyone offer any tuning suggestions?
    Thanks
    Adam

    Hi Adam,
    I've had similar problems before (but not in an Apex app). Whilst it may not be the same for you, the problem related to (A) the select lists and (B) the table widths.
    In both, it was because the browser had to load the data and then determine how to display it. It has to work out the width of each select list and then the width of every cell to work out the width of each column and, thus, the table.
    You can improve the speed by using the "table-layout:fixed" style for the table and by using COL tags with style="width:nnnpx". Together these force the browser to use specific widths for each column and stops it working out the widths for itself. If you don't want to use COL tags, the width would then be set by the width of the first row's cells. Either way, you need to adjust your report template to make these settings.
    Additionally, the longer the select lists, the worse the page-load time. You can see if these are causing the problem by using popup popup LOVs instead.
    Regards
    Andy

  • Long time for creation of materialized view

    Hi,
    we are trying to create a materialized view and this view would contain 1 lakh records and around 50 columns.
    The select statement to get these records takes only 1-2 sec whereas the actual creation of view takes 17 minutes. The database used is Oracle 8i. The code used is
    CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW employee_master_t
    PCTFREE 10
    STORAGE (initial 500k next 500k pctincrease 0)
    REFRESH WITH ROWID COMPLETE START WITH SYSDATE
    NEXT SYSDATE + 1 AS select * from table_name
    Is it because the insert is slow and temp tablespace may have to be increased?
    also, can anyone pls suggest if fast refresh mode can be used with Oracle 8i since currently we are not able to create as error saying that query is complex is returned

    It will be possible to create a Materialised view with up to 20 tables, but you have to understand the restrictions on complex Materialised views with regards to fast refresh.
    To help your understanding, refer to Materialized View Concepts and Architecture
    <br>
    Oracle Database FAQs
    </br>

  • SSRS 2012. ReportServer takes long time to be up.

    SSRS 2012 Sp1
    Hi guys,
    I am using SSRS as my reporting platform, but I have always got the following issue.
    SSRS ReportServer takes time to load.
    The first time takes long, then less time but only if the ReprotServer web page is continuosly retrived.
    HERE the problem:
    If the ReprotServer page is not used after a short time (let me say 10 min), the page takes long time to be up again.
    I have checked the configuration that is set as for default 12 hours.
    Is there a way to speed up the ReportServer opening page time?
    Thanks for your help 

    Hi Fasttrack2,
    According to your description, you want to optimize the performance of your report. Right?
    In this scenario, when your report page is not active for a short time, it will take long time to render again. This is because the you have the report timeout. You can select "Do not timeout report" in Processing. Please refer to the link below:
    SQL Server Reporting Services – Timeout Settings
    For the performance issue, it can be many reason cause the report running slowly. Please refer to the articles below to optimize the report:
    More tips to improve performance of SSRS reports.
    Reporting Services Performance and Optimization
    Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best Regards,
    Simon Hou

  • MDX report rendering takes long time and showing Conflict Message

    Hi All,
    This is my MDX Query
    with member
    [Measures].[Rent] as
    IIF(IsEmpty([Measures].[Budget]),
    NULL, [Measures].[Rent])
    select {[Measures].[Rent]}
    on columns,
                         [Property].[Address].[All].children *
             DESCENDANTS([Account].[Account Hierarchy].[Account Group].[Expenditures],
                         [Account].[Account Tree].[Account]) *
                         [Property].[Property].[All].children
    on rows
    from
       [Master]
    When i comment [Property] Dimension member , i am able to get the result, but i need Property Dimension in MDX.
    Can anyone give some idea ?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Jarugulalaks,
    According to your description, it take long time to render the report when using [Property] dimension, right?
    In this case, the issue can be caused by that there are too many members under this dimension. In your query, you used CrossJoin function to join multiple dimensions which might cause the performance issue. If you cross-join medium-sized or large-sized sets
    (e.g., sets that contain more than 100 items each), you can end up with a result set that contains many thousands of items—enough to seriously impair performance. You can use the NonEmptyCrossjoin function instead of Corssjoin function. For the detail
    information, please see:
    http://sqlmag.com/data-access/cross-join-performance
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms144797.aspx
    Besides, the total time to generate a reporting server report can be divided into 3 elements: Time to retrieve the data (TimeDataRetrieval); Time to process the report (TimeProcessing); Time to render the report (TimeRendering). For the detail information,
    please refer to the link below to see Charlie's reply.
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/a0962b54-6fc2-4111-b8f1-a3722a65fa05/how-to-improve-performance-of-report?forum=sqlanalysisservices#a0962b54-6fc2-4111-b8f1-a3722a65fa05
    Regards,
    Charlie Liao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Takes along time to view a materialized view definition

    Hi,
    Using owb 11.2.0.3 and takes a long time to see any materialized view definition which is based on a particular table (talking a few minutes compared to over a minute compared to seconds
    to see other mview definitions.
    platform aix.
    8 million rows in base table.
    Thoughts as to why this would be case?
    Thanks

    user5716448 wrote:
    Hi,
    Using owb 11.2.0.3 and takes a long time to see any materialized view definition which is based on a particular table (talking a few minutes compared to over a minute compared to seconds
    to see other mview definitions.
    platform aix.
    8 million rows in base table.
    Thoughts as to why this would be case?
    Thanks
    post actual EXPLAIN PLAN

  • Taking an Impossible Amount of time to Render a video

    Greetings,
    I'm using Adobe Premiere Elements 11 for Video editing and it is taking a very very very very long time to render. *about 15 Hours for an Hour and Twenty minuet video. It is exporting to H.264 MP4. HD 1080P
    I have 12 Gig of Ram and I'm using AMD Athlon II 4x 640 in An HP Pavilion P6727 Desktop Computer.
    What is taking so long? If I was to boost my memory up to 16 Gig Ram would it make that big of a difference?
    Thanks! -Cheers-

    The amount of time it takes to render your video depends on how fast your processor is, how much RAM you have, what operating system you're using, what model of camcorder your video is coming from and what resolution and format it is. If you are using photos in your project, your rendering time can also increase and the program may freeze if your photos are larger than 1000x750 pixels in size.
    What model of camcorder is your video coming from, etc?
    Are you talking about just rendering your timeline for smooth playback or are you talking about rendering to output a finished video?

  • Longer time for Material Availability check while creation of prd order.

    Hi guys,
    I am facing a weird problem while creating production orders thru CO01.
    I enter the component and plant and I am also using the forward scheduling option.
    for some reason, SAP is taking a long time for material availability check when I hit the release button.
    Sometimes its taking more than an hour. Its happening with few specific BOM's, and I have checked the master data but I could hardly find a problem in master data.
    Can someone suggest me some tips ??
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sashivardhan

    Hi,
    Please check the Availability check control maintained for Components it should be 01 or 02. Also check the issue storage location maintained or not. You can maintain issue storage location in BOM in Status/lng text tab in Production Storage Location.
    Hope this will help.
    Regards,
    Navin

  • Materialized view creation taking long time

    Hi All,
    We are creating a dimensional OLAP model with the Materialized views. In that we are having 7 dimensions and 1 fact table. I have created all the dimensions with the materialized views with out any problem. But when im trying to create my Fact materialized view it is running for 14 hours and is still running. I'm waiting to see when it will complete. The select statement in the Fact MV returns only 19 records and that too in seconds. But when i use the same select statement for MV creation it is taking a long time. I dont know how long it gonna take. How can i reduce this long running time. Mean while my fact MV is having nearly 15 joins with other physical tables and dimensions.
    Thanks in advance,
    Karthick

    Hi all,
    Thanks for your reply..
    I think i dint clearly mention my problem..
    The select statement for the MV will return 19 records. But when im trying to create the MV it is taking quite a long time. it ran for >14 hours but still it dint create a MV. Why is it happening like this? Is it possible to increase the performance.
    Thanks,
    Karthick

  • SSRS Reports taking long time to load

    Hello,
    Problem : SSRS Reports taking long time to load
    My System environment : Visual Studio 2008 SP1  and SQL Server 2008 R2
    Production Environment : Visual Studio 2008 SP1  and SQL Server 2008 R2
    I have created a Parameterized report (6 parameters), it will fetch data from 1 table. table has 1 year and 6 months data,      I am selecting parameters for only 1 month (about 2500 records). It is taking almost 2 minutes and 30 seconds
    to load the report.
    This report running efficiently in my system (report load takes only 5 to 6 seconds) but in
    production it is taking 2 minutes 30 seconds.
    I have checked the Execution log from production so I found the timing for
    Data retrieval (approx~)       Processing (approx~)               Rendering (approx~)
    10 second                                      15 sec                        
                2 mins and 5 sec.
    But Confusing point is that , if I run the same report at different time overall output time is same (approx) 2 min 30 sec but
    Data retrieval (approx~)       Processing (approx~)                Rendering (approx~)
    more than 1 min                            15 sec                                     
    more than 1 min
    so 1 question why timings are different ?
    My doubts are
    1) If query(procedure to retrieve the data) is the problem then it should take more time always,
    2) If Report structure is problem then rendering will also take same time (long time)
    for this (2nd point) I checked on blog that Rendering depends on environment structure e.g. Network bandwidth, RAM, CPU Usage , Number of users accessing same report at a time.
    So I did testing of report when no other user working on any report But failed (same result  output is 2 min 30 sec)
    From network team I got the result is that there is no issue or overload in CPU usage or RAM also No issue in Network bandwidth.
    Production Database Server and Report server are different (but in same network).
    I checked that database server the SQL Server is using almost Full RAM (23 GB out of 24 GB)
    I tried to allocate the memory to less amount up to 2GB (Trial solution I got from Blogs) but this on also failed.
    one hint I got from colleague that , change the allocated memory setting from static memory to dynamic to SQL Server
    (I guess above point is the same) I could not find that option Static and Dynamic memory setting.
    I did below steps
    Connected to SQL Server Instance
    Right click on Instance go to properties, Go to Memory Tab
    I found three options 1) Server Memory   2) Other memory   3) Section for "Configured values and Running values"
    Then I tried to reduce Maximum  Server memory up to 2 GB (As mentioned above)
    All trials failed, this issue I could not find the roots for this issue.
    Can anyone please help (it's bit urgent).

    Hi UdayKGR,
    According to your description, your report takes too long to load on your production environment. Right?
    In this scenario, since the report runs quickly in developing environment, we initially think it supposed to be the issue on data retrieval. However, based on the information in execution log, it takes longest time on rendering part. So we suggest you optimize
    the report itself to reduce the time for rendering. Please refer to the link below:
    My report takes too long to render
    Here is another article about overall performance optimization for Reporting Services:
    Reporting Services Performance and Optimization
    If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
    Best Regards,
    Simon Hou

  • AME takes a long time to start encoding when using GPU Acceleration (OpenCL)

    Have had this issue for a while not (current update as well as at least the previous one).
    I switched to using GPU Hardware Acceleration over Software Only rendering. The speed for the actual encoding on my Mac is much faster that software only rendering. However, more often than not, the encoding process seems to stick at 0% waiting to start for a long time, say anywhere from 1 minute to several minutes. Then it will eventually start.
    Can't seem to find what is causing this. Doesn't seem related to any particular project, codec, output format or anything else I can see. I'd like to keep using GPU Acceleration but it's pointless if it takes 5 times as long to even start as rendering by software-only would. It doesn't even pass any elapsed time while it's hanging or waiting. Says at 0 until it starts. Like I said, once it starts, it's a much faster render than what the software would take. Any suggestions? Thanks.
    using an iMac, 3.4Ghz, 24GB RAM, AMD Radeon HD 6970M 2048 MB

    Actually, I just discovered it doesn't seem to have anything to do with OpenCL. I just put the rendering back to software only and it is doing the same thing. hangs for a long time before it starts to run. Activity monitor shows it running 85-95% CPU, 17 threads and about 615 MB of memory. Activity Monitor doesn't say its not responding, it just seems kind of idle. It took almost 7 minutes for it to start rendering.
    1- Running version 7.2.2.29 of Media Encoder,
    version 7.2.2 (33) of Premiere.
    2- Yes, a premiere project of HD 1080 source shot with Canon 60D, output to H.264 YouTube 720, fps 23.976
    not sure what you are referring to by native rendering. The rendering setting i tried now is Mercury Playback Engine Software Only if that is what you are referring to. But OpenCL gives me the same issue now.
    3- H.264 YouTube 720, 23,976 - seems to happen on multiple output types
    4- In Premiere, I have my project timeline window selected. Command-M, selected the output location I wanted and what output codec, selected submit to Queue. Media Encoder comes up, the project loads and I select the run icon. It preps and shows the encoding process setup in the "Encoding" window, then just sits there with no "Elapsed" time occurring until almost 5-6 minutes later, then it kicks in.

  • Attribute Change run taking too long time to complete.

    Hi all,
    Attribute change run has been taking too long time to complete.It has to realign 50 odd aggreagates, some by delta , some by reconstruction. But inspite of all the aggregates it used to finish in quick time earlier. But since last 4-5 days it is taking indefinite time to finish.
    Can anyone please suggest what all reasons may be causing this? and what possibly can be the solution to the problem? It is becoming a big issue. So kindly help with ur advises.
    Promise to reward your answer liberally.
    Regards,
    Pradyut.

    Hi,
    Check with your functional owners in R/3 if there are mass changes/realignments or classification changes are going on regarding master data. e.g. reasigning materials to other material groups. This causes a major realignment in BW for all the aggregates. Otherwise check for parameterchanges / patches or missing db stats with your sap basis team.
    Kind regards, Patrick Rieken.

  • Mail takes considerably long time to download attachments

    Hello,
    Wondering if anybody has run into a solution for this problem:
    Mail (Version 3.5, build 930.3) takes a VERY, VERY long time to download any attachments. I am using only ONE account - MobileMe.
    Whenever I receive a message with an attachment (from Mac or PC) that is over 100K, Mail just crawls to a near stop when trying to download it. In fact, if the attachment is over 1MB, there is an excellent chance that the Mail program will hang altogether. I commonly will have to force quit the Mail application in order to get it working on the download again. THIS is the real problem. All other "text-only" messages come in at a normal speed and render almost instantly. In a message where there is a large attachment, the message and it's contents appear almost instantly, but the attachment(s) sits at the bottom, middle, or top of the message and remain "greyed out" while downloading. I get no indication that the attachment is downloading from the server in the mail activity pane either. It just sits there blank. Eventually the image will appear in the body of the message, but only if I click on another message in my inbox and then "click back" to the attachment message.
    I just sent myself a message as a test. It was a 4.5MB Tiff file. It sent out from my account in about 45 seconds (ending in the "Swoosh" sound.) When Mail detected the new message a few seconds later, the download from MobileMe's servers took an astonishing 14 minutes to completely download and render in the body of my message. I can see no rhyme or reason as to why this is happening, but it has been present for over a year, even through OS updates, mail rebuilds, optimizations, and IMAP settings alterations.
    The same download speed can be achieved on my wife's iPod Touch. Very fast.
    The really strange thing is that my iPhone does NOT do this. I sent the same image again to my account and checked my mail with my iPhone instead. It took the same 45 seconds to send the image, but the iPhone was able to download and display the image in the iPhone mail App in just over a minute. This is using the exact same internet connection in my house, not Edge or 3G.
    I have rebuilt my mailbox, deleted all accounts and settings, and have started from scratch several times. I am beginning to think that this is either an issue with the OS, or a major problem with my Mail application itself.
    Any ideas on what may be causing this? I am using the standard MobileMe IMAP account settings that are provided when you set up a new Mail account.
    Thanks for any help you can provide - this is driving me crazy. I have had to tell all of my friends to NOT send me any messages over 1MB or it will destroy my mail application for several minutes.
    Message was edited by: nekosaur

    ME TOO!!!! This has been driving me nuts!!! I've been trying to streamline my workflow and integrate everything the way it's SUPPOSED to work, to no avail! Does anyone know anything about this at all? Is apple looking into this? Does anyone have suggestions?
    With me, it's any msg that has an image file, which is every email my school sends me! The msg doesn't display, Mail hangs and I have to force quit.
    HELP!!!

Maybe you are looking for