Multi mapping 1 to n files

Hi,
We are trying to develop an scenario with multimapping 1:n, but the issue is that we should save it in different files.
Let me explain the scenario a little bit further.
XI receives an IDOC of type delvry03. We split the message into several messages (all of them of the same type, let's call it OutDelvry).
Right now, the AE generates one file with repetitions of the message OutDelvry. What we liked is to generated as many files a n messages are created from the splitting message.
Any idea?
Thans in advance,
David R.

Hi David,
The only solution which comes to my mind is this:
1) Create a BPM.
2)Split the response on some condition say itemno etc. into n target messages.
You can send those to different destinations.
See the sample scenario in help.sap.com.
The below thread might help.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/14/80243b4a66ae0ce10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Regards,
Sumit

Similar Messages

  • Error: 1:n multi-mapping using BPM for file to file scenario

    Hi. Iu2019m trying to do 1:n multi-mapping using bpm scenario. I use file to file. Input file consists of many records and then I want many record to be transformed into many file at target system. I follow step in http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/. However, I have a problem when file is retrieved in to XI. It doesnu2019t create any output file.
    When I look at SXMB_MONI, it shows u201CNo object type found for the message Check that the corresponding process is activated.u201D Besides, it shows error message "Unable to perform action for selected message" when i clikc at PE in SXMB_MONI.
    I have check at many previous posts with the same error message but still couldnu2019t solve it. I already activate my BPM and check that status in SXI_CACHE = 0. There is noting left in change list of my IR and ID.
    Here is my design and configuration.
    IR
    Data Type: DT_file_split -> for both input and output file
    Message Type: MT_file_split_sender, MT_file_split_receiver
    Message Interface: SI_file_split_in, SI_file_split_out, SI_file_abs_source, SI_file_abs_target
    Message mapping: MM_file_split for mapping MT_file_split_sender with MT_file_split_receiver
    Interface mapping: OM_file_split
    u2022     Source = SI_file_split_out
    u2022     Target = SI_file_split_in
    u2022     Mapping Program = MM_file_split
    BPM following this link http://www.riyaz.net/blog/xipi-1n-multi-mapping-using-bpm/.
    ID
    Import my Integration process
    2 Communication Channel for getting input file (CC_File_split_sender) and creating output file (CC_File_split)
    2 Receiver determination:
    u2022     Source system to BPM using interface SI_File_Abs_source
    u2022     BPM to target system using interface SI_File_Abs_target
    1 Interface determination:
    u2022     from source system to BPM
    u2022     Sender interface: SI_File_Split_Out
    u2022     Receiver interface: SI_file_abs_source
    1 Sender Agreement
    u2022     Commu. Component: Source System
    u2022     Using interface: SI_File_Abs_source
    u2022     Sender Communication Channel: CC_File_Split_Sender
    1 Receiver Agreement
    u2022     Sender Communication Component: BPM
    u2022     Receiver Communication Component: Target System
    u2022     Receiver Interface: SI_File_Split_In
    u2022     Receiver Communication Channel: CC_File_Split
    Anyone know how to fix this?
    Thanks,
    Pavin

    Hi,
    Yes, thats the problem.
    You are creating file from test tab of  1..N mapping .
    In case of 1..N mappping in mapping Extra tags of messages are addded to the data.As shown here:-
    Messages
          Message1
               MessageType
    When you use this mapping to generate xml message then it will add additional tags for <Messages> and <Message1>, which is not correct. it should only have structure of you MT.
    So remove start and end tag of <Messages> and <Message1> from your data file. Mentioned below in bold.
    <xml......>
    <Messages>
    <Message1>
    <MT_...>
    </MT_...>
    </Message1>
    </Messages>
    This should solve your problem.
    Regards,
    Sami.

  • IDoc Package to File using Multi Mapping urjent

    Hi Experts,
    I have a scenario where PI 7.1 need to receive IDocs in a package and should send three files to target system. I am using multi mapping concept here, where i have created one message mapping, one operation mapping with three interfaces specified in it. I am getting the error "Inbound interface found several times (for same sender and receiver) for the outbound interface" .

    Hi,
    Please make occurence of the message type in message mapping as 0..unbounded.
    Also in operation mapping the occurence of inbound interface as 0..unbounded.
    Also now in configuration-->interface determination... access the new operation mapping.... u will c the occurence as 0..unbounded. Refresh the cache ad execute it once more...
    Let us know the result...
    Babu
    Edited by: hlbabu123 on Apr 3, 2010 1:16 PM

  • Multi mapping and File Content Conversion

    Hi,
    I've created a similar interface to the the one in this blog
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
    In the Config, I receive a CSV and use FCC in the File Adapter to build the XML file. Because of the multimapping, XI adds the following to my Message Mapping
    <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
       <ns0:Message1>
    Do I need to add this XML to the FCC??

    No,you dont need to add extra tags.
    Those tags are only for XI internal processing.
    Thanx
    Aamir

  • Multi mapping.. is it possible File to Idoc & FIle .. its urgent?????

    Hi All,
    File to Idoc & File.
    I need to pick the file and i need to do multi mapping, so that from the file we can generate
    one idoc which has to go to SAP and
    one acknowledgment's file and sent back to partner.
    Based on the below blog, looks like we can't use Idoc adapter when the target message is Idoc using Multi mapping.
    /people/jin.shin/blog/2006/02/07/multi-mapping-without-bpm--yes-it146s-possible
    Can anyone suggest me how i can achieve this scenario without using BPM.??
    Regards
    Seema.

    Hi,
    The Multi mapping is possible without BPM but not for IDOC as its not part of Java Stack. IDOC adapter is on ABAP stack.
    As Raj have suggested,
    You could create two different Mappings one for file to IDOC and another for file to file as an acknowledgment.
    In Receiver determination you need to use multiple receivers as IDOC --R/3 receiver and the File receiver system.
    It will create the IDOC as well as push the acknowledgment to file also.
    But incase if you get any problem with sending the IDOC then also you will get successful acknowledgment via file. So directly there will not be any relation between these IDOC and File receivers as an delivery recipt of IDOC.
    Here either you have to use the IDOC acknowledgment feature or BPM or Alert notification to get the exact notification about the IDOC posting to receiver system.
    Please refer below links
    1. IDOC acknowledgment
    This Feature is Available under SP 18 and we are on SP16
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/c8f66bc7a56bb0e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    Check this document on handling IDOC acknowledgements. This might give you some pointers.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f6d2d790-0201-0010-9382-b50b499b3fbe
    This Feature is Available under SP 18 and we are on SP16
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/c8f66bc7a56bb0e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
    Check this document on handling IDOC acknowledgements. This might give you some pointers.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f6d2d790-0201-0010-9382-b50b499b3fbe
    How to Handle Acknowledgments for IDoc (NW7.0)
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/903a0abc-e56e-2910-51a8-9dc616df56eb
    IDOC acknowledgements
    2. BPM
    File to IDOC with BPM
    File to idoc with BPM
    Problem in BPM implementation
    Use Aleaud in BPM
    /people/udo.martens/blog/2005/09/30/one-logical-system-name-for-serveral-bpm-acknowledgements
    /people/pooja.pandey/blog/2005/07/27/idocs-multiple-types-collection-in-bpm
    3. Alert Notification
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/09/xi-alerts--step-by-step - Alert Configuration
    /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/09/xi-alerts--troubleshooting-guide - Trouble shoot alert config
    Thanks
    Swarup

  • Regarding RFC to FILE - Multi Mapping

    Hii
    I am doing BAPI/RFC to File Asynchronous Scenario. The data is being Pushed from SAP via BAPI/RFC. For testing, I am sending the data form Test tool of RWB.
    I am sending single BAPI/RFC with 3 PO, in the target I should get 3 files generated. I am using Multi Mapping. I am using Dynamic configuration for Filename and created UDF. My target filename should be Process_Order_%y%y%y%y%M%M%d%d%H%H%m%m%s%s
    I had Mapped the UDF to the root node.
    In the SXMB_MONI, I am able to see 3 files getting created. But in the target folder I am getting onlly 1 file with the 3rd PO content and the file name is correct. The first  2 PO's are missing.
    When I testted the same with out UDF using Add timestamp in the File Adapter, i am able to get 3 files generated.
    Any Inputs would be appreciated.
    Regards,
    Varun
    Edited by: Varun Reddy on Jul 2, 2009 10:20 AM

    But in the target folder I am getting onlly 1 file with the 3rd PO content and the file name is correct. The first 2 PO's are missing.
    When I testted the same with out UDF using Add timestamp in the File Adapter, i am able to get 3 files generated
    The files are not missing but the 1 and 2 files are getting overwritten by the 3 file........what is the name that is generated for the files by the UDF....i doubt it is the same name...and hence this is happening....
    Whereas when you are using the Timestamp option you are getting all the files since the names are different......so that means you have to make some change in the file names so that you get all the three files....else there doesn't seem to be any workaround...
    Regards,
    Abhishek.

  • Spliting files based on condition using multi mapping with BPM

    Hi All,
    Can any one please let me know How to <b>Splite the outbound records based on condition using multi mapping with Integration Process in BPM</b>?
    Thanks
    Govindu.

    Hi All,
    Sorry for mistake this question for Exchange infrastructure guys.
    Thanks,
    Govindu

  • Multi Mapping

    Hi all,
    I need a help on how to go about the following scenerio.
    XI first performs a multi-mapping that creates two output messages:
    One is the target message in Flat File Format. The mapping also generates the filename for the output message which should follow the format 11_<Unique ID>.txt. This filename is written into the XML Payload of the message. The File Adapter later does a flat file conversion on the message. In this step, the filename is not written into the flat file. Instead, it is used by the file adapter as the target filename.
    The file should be placed in a specified directory. 
    The mapping also creates a second message, which only contains the same filename in the payload. This message goes to a second File Adapter, which also does a flat file conversion. Its output only contains the filename that was created by the mapping, followed by a line break. The output of this File Adapter is written into the same directory as the first file. The name of the output file is 11.catlg. If the file already exists in the target directory, the output needs to be appended to this file.
    Thankyou.

    Shruthi,
    It seems the payload contains the filename and this filename as to be used in the Communication Channel of file adapter.If my understanding is correct the problem can be solved by the Variable substitution. Refer the below link:[http://****************/Tutorials/XI/Variable/substitution.htm]
    Regards,
    Kiran Bobbala

  • Multi Mapping error

    Hi,
    I am required to have a IP recieve 3 IDOC types triggered from BD10 . It can trigger 3 or more IDOCs. For Eg.
    1 ARTMAS (only 1) , 2 INFRECs and 1 LIKOND.
    If anyone IDOC has come then after a waiting period of 1 minute it should come out of FORK.
    My IP is like this.
    In a FORK there are 4 branches.
    1) ARTMAS receiver
    2) Loop(infinite) with INFREC Receiver and a Container Operation to collect all IDOCs
    3) Loop(infinite) with LIKOND Receiver and a Container Operation to collect all IDOCs
    4) A wait Step with a container operation to initialize endtime variable
    necesary branches: 4
    The Fork Comes out when the end condition is met ie the End variable is Set or if all the IDOCS have  come.
    Corelation on MATNR.
    Next I have the transormation and send step.
    In the MM i have 3 Source and 1 Target.
    Artmas 0-1 occurance
    INFREC 0 - unbounded
    LINKND 0-unbounded
    I have created the Target with External Definition and have set the correct occurance in the XSD file
    I have mapped the neceessary Segments from INFREC and LIKOND and all the Segments of ARTMAS to the Target structure.
    In SXMBMONI it says error on Outbound side and
    I see Mapping Exception  when I seen in WORKFLOW.
    Is my design Correct?
    I have tested the Interface & Message Mapping they are correct
    Request your help.
    John Rajesh
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    - <MappingTrace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Namespace:http://test.com/usa/SapRetail/ARTICLE_CLASSIFY/TESTDEMO</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Name:IM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB01</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-SWCV:00000000000000000000000000000000</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Type:JAVA</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">Mapping-Program:com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Multi mapping required.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Creating Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Load b8f12d30-2c45-11da-90af-ef160a892024, http://test.com/usa/SapRetail/ARTICLE_CLASSIFY/TESTDEMO, -1, com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_.class.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Search com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_.class (http://test.com/usa/SapRetail/ARTICLE_CLASSIFY/TESTDEMO, -1) in swcv b8f12d30-2c45-11da-90af-ef160a892024.</Trace>
      <Trace level="3" type="T">Loaded class com.sap.xi.tf._MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
      <Trace level="2" type="T">Call method execute of the application Java mapping com.sap.xi.tf._MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">RuntimeException during appliction Java mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_MM_ARTMAS04_TO_ZARTMAS04_PUB_</Trace>
      <Trace level="1" type="T">com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException: RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformation: Cannot produce target element /ns4:Messages/ns4:Message1/ZARTMAS04_PUB/IDOC. Check xml instance is valid for source xsd and target-field mapping fulfills requirements of target xsd at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.AMappingProgram.start(AMappingProgram.java:292) at

    Check the following
    1. Have u mapped the root level element?
    2. Inside interface mapping, when u say read interface, is it diplaying both the interface.
    Also check ur input
    may be u r not providing proper input
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • SP14 Multi-mapping - error in receiver idoc adapter

    Hi,
    I have a scenario where a business service should send some XML to SAP CRM. I get the file via a sender JMS adapter and try to post it to CRM via a receiver IDOC adapter.
    I have created a multimapping (1:N - 1 XML file to many Idocs) as should in the repository.
    In the configuration under Interface Determination, I have chosen 'RB_SPLIT' and selected the interface multimapping.
    It should be pointed out, that when testing both interface and message mapping i get no error. All idocs seem to be created as they should.
    When testing the setup 'real life' the message fails. The error message in the monitor says:
    - <!--  Call Adapter
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="IDOC_ADAPTER">ATTRIBUTE_WRONG_INTF</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>InterfaceCollection</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Unable to interpret IDoc interface InterfaceCollection</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    Notice that the above error is when trying to send only 1 record, which in turn then should result in only 1 idoc.
    If trying to send multiple XML records, i get the following error:
    - <!--  Technical Routing
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">MMF_ENGINETYPE</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1 />
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>A system error occurred in the outbound binding</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    In the monitor in the payload of 'Request message mapping' I see as many Maindocument, Submaindocument pairs as should be Idocs.
    Now i really don't know how to interpret the error messages in both cases, so I'm a little lost here...
    It should be pointed out that the idoc being used everywhere in this scenario, has not been modified - from all places it is being used (and only exists) in the 'Imported objects | Idocs' place.
    Also the Idoc is also being used as Inbound interface - so no mistakes here either.
    I really hope someone can help me here, as I'm otherwise pretty stuck in this case.
    Best regards,
    Daniel

    Hi Daniel,
    I have exactly the same type of scenario (under SPS14 and now also SPS15), sending an XML message over JMS to XI and trying a multi-mapping to many IDocs (actually a list of orders in XML is mapped to n ORDERS Idocs).
    I also face problems doing so, when I use the IDoc Adapter as outbound in the Receiver Agreement. I receive the following error:
    <i>CO_TXT_MMF_ENGINETYPE
    Messages in multi message format can be sent to one adapter engine only</i>
    However, I tested the same scenario by just changing the Receiver Agreement to a File Communication Channel and - surprise, surprise - it works. One file per IDoc is created.
    Of course, this is not what we want to accomplish, but when I checked this piece of documentation (sorry another link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/content.htm
    the IDoc adapter is not listed in the list of Adapters that are supported. Does that mean, that this feature is not supported for generating IDocs? Maybe that's a question for a SAP OSS Message?
    I hope that helped you a little further - if you find out more I'd be happy to learn about it.
    regards,
    Peter

  • Multi-mapping for ibound IDOC

    Hi! All
    It would be of great help if you provide your suggestions on:
    Mapping one XML source file to 6 IDOC receivers, 2 of them are of the same type and 4 are distinct idoc types.
    I tried multi-mapping and received the following error:
    "Messages in multi-message format can only be sent to one Adapter Engine"
    Looks like IDOC adapter does not support multi mapping...
    Can you please suggest any other option apart from using BPM(since it consumes lot of resources).
    Thanks a lot!!
    Regards,
    Patrick

    Hey
    its not possible to do Multimapping over IDOC's without BPM.
    other way around can be to do a single -single scenario,suppose u have 6 IDOC's to post then u need to design 6 different scenarios for them.
    without BPM you cant do multimapping for IDOC or HTTP
    Thanx
    Aamir
    Message was edited by:
            Aamir Suhail

  • Multi-mapping 1:n - 1:1

    Hi,
    We are using multi-mapping in a file-to-file interface. When we have 1:n everything is ok, but when we have 1:1 we have this error:
    Success The message status set to DLNG.
    Error Unable to find channel ID
    Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection AFW failed, due to: Couldn't find delivery channel for message: f285a9a0-4a74-11dc-b843-00145e1b2f3d.
    We need this interface working for both 1:n and 1:1 situations.
    Any idea?
    Thanks for your help:)

    Hi Diana !!
    Check this thread:
    Re: Couldn't find delivery channel !!!
    Regards,
    Matias.

  • Multi-Mapping Message Split 1:n

    Hi experts,
    I have a few questions regarding a multi-mapping for a 1:n message split. I have a business process which collects IDOCs from a specific IDOC type (ZHINVOIC01).
    I have a 1-to-1 Mapping for collecting the IDOCs.
    After this 1-to-1 Mapping the IDOC has the following structure:
    xdoc has the occurrence 0..unbounded
    For every IDOC in the source structure one xdoc in the target structure should be created. My Mapping works very fine, but I have one question. If there are more IDOC-Elements in the source structure, I have more xdoc-Elements in the target structure. But I do not want to have one target-message. the mapping should create one file with the element xdoc for every IDOC element in the source structure.
    I want to send a xml-file for each xdoc-element to a ftp-server. is that possible?
    Thanks and best regards
    Christopher Kühn

    Hi Udo,
    look at my example above:
    for the source structure
    <Messages>
       <Message1>
          <ZHINVOIC01>
             <IDOC/>
             <IDOC/>
             <IDOC/>
          </ZHINVOIC01>
       </Message1>
    </Messages>
    I have the following target structure:
    <Messages>
       <Message1>
          <xdoc/>
          <xdoc/>
          <xdoc/>
       <Message1>
    <Messages>
    now the target structure is only one message, isn't it?
    But I want to have for this case 3 Messages each with only one xdoc-element.
    I hope that we are not talking at cross-purposes
    Thanks and best regards
    Christopher

  • Multi-mapping scenario with multiple receivers

    Hello all,
    I have an interface using multi-mapping to generate to different files types from one source; works great.
    JDBC --> XI --> (1) XML (2) CSV
    I now need to have the XML file go to one receiver and the CSV file needs to go to a second receiver.  I've looked at the blog:
    /people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
    This blog shows how to configure dynamic receiver determination based on the source data.  In my case the output files are identical (as far as mapping), the only difference is the output format.  Has any one seen a "How to" document or blog more in line to my scenario?
    Regards,
    Jose

    Hi,
    You can also do this way
    You can define as many number of Business system you need. Say for eg you need to send XML to one BS and CSV to another BS.
    Instead of doing Extended interface determination... Goto to Receiver Determination and when you are adding the Receiver service you have the option to add one more Service... There you give both the Business Service and hence you will have two inbound interface and you can different interface mapping and so on..
    Regards,
    Prakash

  • Multi mapping problem

    Hi All,
    I tried a simple BPM with a transformation step involved. I have done a multi mapping here. One source msg to 2 target msgs.When I test the mapping using test tab with the incoming payload from SXMB_MONI, I am getting 2 msgs as expected. But during runtime, this is not happening.
    These are the output msgs I am getting. It does not have any node in it. The second msg doesnot even have a closing tag for namespace.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    <ns:MT_TGT xmlns:ns="urn:bpm:file:2rec">
      <Header />
      </ns:MT_TGT>
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
      <ns:MT_RECR xmlns:ns="urn:bpm:file:2rec" />
    Any pointers on this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jai Shankar.

    Hi Bhavesh,
    Yes. I checked the source msg in BPM container element. I tested the mapping with thet payload. It is working fine. I can see the source payload in container element as expected. But the MESSAGES_OUT has 2 msgs in the format I pasted above.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jai Shankar.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cannot install Windows 8 Consumer Preview on MacBook Air 11" (Late 2010)

    Hi, I'm trying to install Windows 8 Consumer Preview on my MacBook Air 11" (Late 2010 model) via Boot Camp assistant. I've hacked the Info.plist of the Boot Camp Assistant to allow it to create a bootable USB installer drive. After successfully creat

  • Intermittent Wireless Connection, Dropping Wireless Connection

    I am asking this in hopes of finding at least some way to diagnose my problem and hopefully eventually solving it. My wireless connection currently drops at varying amounts of time. Sometimes I can go 20mins others merely 5mins. The Airport reads tha

  • Delivery Split

    Hi all, I am encountering a problem, when i tried to do a Outbound Delivery(Order Combination) it is getting split into two deliveries, the reason what i am getting from the report is EKNUM(Number of foreign trade in MM and SD Documents and ZKURL(Com

  • How do I get MacU app videos to run?

    After a recent replacement of my hard drive MacU videos will not run. I have tried uninstalling and reinstalling them but with no success. They ran OK before the drive replacement.

  • Safari icloud tabs not working between ipad mini and iPhone 5

    I have an ipad mini an iMac a MacBook Pro and an iPhone 5. All running the latest operating systems. The ipad mini and iPhone 5 can't see each others open I cloud tabs in safari. Anyone know why? Private browsing is off on the devices. Thanks.