No fact table at the requested level error.

I have one dimension
Account
Two fact tables
Threshold and Transaction
These tables are joined to the Account Dim using Account Number.
Now when I create an analysis using Account Numbers from all three tables, it says no fact table at the requested level. If I include any other fact from both the fact tables, it populates null. It works right when I create an analysis from one dimension and either of the fact tables.
Why do we get this error and how else should it be modeled.
Edited by: 979130 on Dec 29, 2012 12:52 AM

I'm not sure about your data.. I give couple of options try them out any of one should work.
Assuming both facts are at same granular: You need to create Logical Fact table in BMM add first fact as source then, open properties wizard and add other fact table.
Assuming both facts are at Different or Same granular: You need to create Logical Fact table in BMM add first fact and then add 2nd fact as 2nd logical table source and set the content tab for both facts
Using any of the option you'll be going for metrics and use them in report.
In general: You need to let BI server let know how data is spread across tables so that BI Server can respond as you expected.
Hope this helps, Appreciate if you mark as correct/helpful
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Dec 29, 2012 12:58 PM

Similar Messages

No fact table exists at the requested level of detail Error.

Hi Everybody,
Facing a issue on the using Fact less Fact tables.
Scenario:
========
Using two subject areas to develop a report.OBIEE 11g
Fact1 --> Compensation Plan Assignments Real Time
Fact2 --> Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details
On both facts we created dummy metrics on respective table id's and aggregated to ROWCOUNT.
As i said in earlier we are using the above 2 subject areas to develop reports.
Logical SQL:
===========
SELECT
0 s_0, "Incentive Compensation - Compensation Plan Assignments Real Time"."Role"."Role Name" s_1,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details"."Cost Center" s_2,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant Details"."Country Code" s_3,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Participant First Name" s_4,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Participant Last Name" s_5,
"Incentive Compensation - Participant Detail Real Time"."Participant"."Party Number" s_6
FROM "Incentive Compensation - Earnings Real Time" FETCH FIRST 65001 ROWS ONLY
Error Message:
==============
Expression 'RowCount:[DAggr(Fact - Compensation Plan Assignment.RowCount by [ Dim - Participant Details.Cost Center, Dim - Compensation Role.Role Name, Dim - Participant.Participant Name] )]' converted to NULL because [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request RowCount:[DAggr(Fact - Compensation Plan Assignment.RowCount by [ Dim - Participant Details.Cost Center, Dim - Compensation Role.Role Name, Dim - Participant.Participant Name] )]..
[2013-10-21T12:18:45.000-05:00] [OracleBIServerComponent] [TRACE:2] [USER-34] [] [ecid: 004uJx90aHO9lZ73VJJNB80007eh000gl_,0:2:1:9:5] [tid: 457c2940] [requestid: f2e001b] [sessionid: f2e0000] [username: [email protected]] -------------------- Query Status: [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:
Please share some ideas on this or any guidelines will be very much helpfull.

Govardhan,
Did u configured any Dimension Hierarchy please set the levels in that particular Fact LTS.
For more info,check the below thread
https://forums.oracle.com/thread/2134934
Thanks,

No fact table exists at the requested level of detai error

Hi Gurus,
Gud Evening,
There is a report with 10 columns and its coming fine when ever we are adding new column some date column (Start Date) it is showing the below error
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:
Can any give some suggestions..
Regards

Hi,
You have to go to the fact LTS and set granularity for each dimension associated with it. You might be bringing a column from a dimension in your report, for which you didn't set up granularity in the facts LTS.
Thanks
Venkat
OBIEEDeveloper

OBIEE 11g - No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

My dimesion tables are snow-flake.
Table1 has Key, ProductName, ProductSize, Table2Key
Table2 has Key, ProductDepartment, Table3Key
Table3 has Key, ProductDivision
I have created 2 hierarchies (in same dimension Product). Note: ProductSize is in Table1.
ProductDivision > ProductDepartment > ProductName (shared level)
ProductSize > ProductName (shared level)
There are 2 fact tables
Fact1 is at ProductName level
Fact2 is at ProductDepartment level
When I create a request with columns as ProductSize and some measure; and filter it on ProductDepartment. The request fails with error "No fact table exists at the requested level of detail", but the request can ideally be answered using fact with ProductName level.
I have properly defined logical level keys in the hierarchies and logical level in the LTS (content tab)
Can anyone point me what I am doing wrong here?

Since both fact tables are at same granular level I would suggest to map each other (Signon_A maping Signon_B) in BMM layer logical fact @source.
Considering them as Fact and with fact extension.
BTW: Did you try by setting implicit fact at subject area properties?
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Feb 1, 2013 9:04 AM

[nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail:

Hi All,
I am using OBIEE 11.1.1.6.8.
I have below senario...My fact table contains 3 LTS(yearly, Monthly, Weekly) and TimeDim contains3 LTSs(yearly, Monthly, Weekly)
Fact-Weekly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimWeekly
Fact-Monthly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimMonthly
Fact-Yearly joins with (D1,D2,D3) & TimeDimYearly
I hv also set the Fact source content to appropriate level of TimeDIM and details level of other Dimensions.
when i build a report using only year_code or month_code_or week_code as filter the query is going to appropriate physical sources
ie. if i take week_code as filter then the query firing to FactWeek, TimeDimWeekly & other Dimensions
if i take Month_code as filter then the query firing to FactMonthk, TimeDimMonthly & other Dimensions
Problem is when I use dynamic filter its is giving [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail: error.
My filter is something like this using presentation variable pvTime (filter is prompted)
case '@{pvTime}'
when 'Weekly' Then "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY"
when 'Monthly' Then "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY"
when 'Yearly' Then "Calendar"."Year ID" end
Please help me if I missed any step
Thanks
Smita

Its a guess but try the below.. As you are using the CASE statement in your filter, use it in the below way.
Store the value that is prompted into a presentation Variable
YOUR WAY
case '@{pvTime}'
when 'Weekly' Then "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY"
when 'Monthly' Then "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY"
when 'Yearly' Then "Calendar"."Year ID" end
SUGGESTED WAY
(case '@{pvTime}'='Weekly' and "Calendar"."Week - WYYYY" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1
when '@{pvTime}'='Monthly' and "Calendar"."Month - MONYYYY" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1
when '@{pvTime}'='Yearly' and "Calendar"."Year ID" = '@{new PV}' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) =1
This might correct the way your are using your CASE statement in Filters..

No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

We have two fact tables F1,F2 and D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 dimensions.
They are connected line this.
F1 to D1, D2, D3 and self dimension D_of_F1
F2 to D2, D3 and self dimension D_of_F2
Means D2 and D3 are common dimensions between two facts.
D_of_F1
         |
         |
D1--F1--D2
         |      |
         |      |
        D3   |
        |       |
        |       |
        |-F2-|
        |
        |
        |
   D_of_F2
Hierarchies
H1 for D1
H2 for D2
H3 for D3
H_of_F1 for D_of_F1
H_of_F2 for D_of_F2
and pinned LTS of F1 --> H1 detail, H2 Detail,H3 Detail, H_of_F1 Detail
and pinned LTS of F2 --> H2 Detail,H3 Detail, H_of_F2 Detail
We are selecting these columns
D1.C1, D1.C2, D2.C1, D2.C2,D3.C1 and report works perfactly.
But when I add D_of_F2.C1 then report gives this error
Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail
Please help me to solve this error....
I m new in OBIEE concepts so not able to trubleshoot...
Thank you.

i'm try to do an analysis between two tables (that have a relatinship), we had inclued first the FACTURA.FACTURA_COD, then columns from COBRANCAS and it work's. When we inclued the FACTURA.COMISSIONISTA_ID it return the fowlling error :check the level set in content tab in fact table.it can happen that FACTURA.COMISSIONISTA_ID is at a lower level than specified in fact table.
Regards,
Sandeep

No Fact Table Exists at the request level of Detail

Hi,
I'm new to BI.can anybody come across more than one fact table in BMM layer,currently i working with AP module,i am getting the error Error NO:14025 No Fact Table Exists at the request level of Detail.
Even i check with content tab where i have given detail level for confirming tables and total for non-confirming tables.
can any one have document related more than fact table in BMM layer, any body give me the right solution.
Thanks in advance !

thanks for your response,i did for the selected measures also. in Account payable model i have two fact.
F1 with dimension D1,D2,D3,D4
F2 with Dimension D5,D6,D7,D8
when i'm trying to generate reports F1 with D1,D2,D3,D4 i am getting the output,but with the non-conforming table D5,D6,D7 i am getting the error. can you give some document to work more than 1 fact table.

No fact table exists at the requested level

Hi,
I have a 3 dimension tables and D_CANDIDATE, D_QUALIFICATION, D_SERIES. D_CANDIDATE is linked with D_QUALIFICATION and D_SERIES. If i create a analysis with all the 3 dimensions i am getting this error. no fact table exists at the requested level. When i remove D_SERIES from the analysis it is fine. What i might have done wrong. Can anyone help me out please.
Regards,
Natesh

So I'm assuming your joins are like
D_CANDIDATE--> D_QUALIFICATION
D_CANDIDATE--> D_SERIES
Then treat D_CANDIDATE as logical fact in BMM and use reports, it is nice to have default hierarchies for D_QUALIFICATION and D_SERIES. in this case D_QUALIFICATION and D_SERIES are logical dimension tables in BMM
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Apr 4, 2013 8:05 AM

OBI Joining two lookup tables. [nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail

Hello,
I basically have only fact tables that I need for my analysis. No dimensions, no hierarchies.
When add two tables in OBI Answers to start the analysis I see this error:
[nQSError: 14025] No fact table exists at the requested level of detail
I have them defined as lookup tables. How can I join lookup tables?
In order to pre-filter them using the user_name session variable.

Hi Nagireddy.
As described:
open your rpd. go to "manage" -> Variable Manager / New / Session / Variable. so to create a new session variable in the .rpd.
then you create a variable NO_FORCE_TO_DETAIL_BIN and se the default to 1.
BUT....this did actually not do the trick
I have created a logical table that is a table made up of the two that I just want to join and as soon as I create a bi answers report that contain columns from those two tables I see the error 14025.

Changes in the request level

Dear Experts,
can you please tell me the reason for the below changes in the request level.
Step1)
Once I executed the Info package till 5 to 6 hours atleast one record will not update and the request will be in yellow .
Step 2)
Then suddenly the request will become red and atleast one record will not update and the message will be as:--
Diagnosis: No Errors found the current process has probably not yet finihed.
System responce : The ALE of Inbox is identical to the ALE outbox of the source sytem
or
The maximum wait time for thiis request has not been exeeded.
or
The background job has not yet finished in the source sytem.
Step 3)
Then after some time suddenly around 800 records will come and the request also wil become yellow and the message will be as same as above.
Thanks and Regards,
Suresh.

Hi Suresh,
Check the trend of the data load requests from this datasource.
There are few possibilities like :
1) If all the requests are taking this much time,then your extractor is taking time based on the logic written to extract data from the base tables.
2) If this perticular load request is taking time,then check the selections you have given in the infopackage to fetch the data
The reason for turning it to yellow,red and again yellow is :
The maximum wait time given for the IP is exceeded.When the job in source is running its yellow,if exceeded the time limit,it is red in BW but yellow in source.Once the records are fetched, system sets the technical status to yellow again and then in turn to green once job is source system is finished.
Hope this helps !!
Regards,
Yogita.

Join fact table with higher dimension level

how do i join fact tables with higher dimension levels with discoverer?
fact with detail at level C
measure X
dimension with
D->C->B->A
E->C
level
A B C
1------1------1
2------2------1
3------2------1
join between fact X and dimension level C
X=3*C because of sum(X) in discoverer and 3xC in dimension
is there a way to get correct values for X without creating a dimension like
D->C
E->

another way of asking this is whether you can create a summary table in Discoverer at a higher level than a dimension's fundamental grain. In other words - the summary examples in the documentation all describe leaving out one or more of your dimensions... they are either left in or completely taken out. But, some of the most effective summarization occurs when you summarize daily data to a monthly level. Assuming that I have a sales table (at a daily level, and a key value sales_date), and a table date_dim (primary key sales_date), I would like to create a summary sales_month_summary where the sales are grouped on month_year (which is a field in the sales_date table).
How is this done? I suspect that we can't use the date_dim table with the summary (due to the problems noted by the poster above). Do we have to create another table "month_dim"? Do we have to fold all of the desired date attributes (month, quarter, year) into the summary? Obviously we'd like to re-use all of the pertinent already existing date items (quarter, month, year, etc.), not recreate them over again, which would result in essentially two sets of items in the EUL. [One used for this month summary, and another used for the detail.]
I searched the forum - someone asked this same question back in 2000 - there was no answer provided.
The only other thought I have is to "snowflake" the date_dim into two tables and two folders, one at a date level, another at the month level. Then the detail tables can connect to date_dim (which is linked to month_dim), while the summary data can connect directly to month_dim.

Distinct count for multiple fact tables in the same cube

I'm fairly new to working with SSAS, but have been working with DW environments for many years.
I have a cube which has 4 fact tables. The central fact table is Encounter and then I also have Visit, Procedure and Medication. Visit, Procedure and Medication all join to Encounter on Encounter Key. The relationship between Encounter
and Procedure and Encounter and Medication are both an optional 1 to 1. The relationship between Encounter and Visit is an optional 1 to many.
Each of the fact tables join to the Patient dimension on the Patient Key. The users are looking for a distinct count of patients in all 4 fact tables.
What is the best way to accomplish this so that my cube does not talk all day to process? Please let me know if you need any more information about my cube in order to answer this.
Thanks for the help,
Andy

Hi Andy,
Each distinct count measure cause an ORDER BY clause in the SELECT sent to the relational data source during processing. In SSAS 2005 or later, it creates a new measure group for each distinct count measure(it's a technique strategy for improving perormance).
Besides, please take a look at the following distinct count optimization techniques:
Create Customized Aggregations
Define a Processing Plan
Create Partitions of Equal Size
Use Partitions Comprised of a Distinct Range of Integers
Distribute the Hash of Your UserIDs
Modulo Function
Hash Function
Choose a Partitioning Strategy
For more detail information, please refer to the article below:
Analysis Services Distinct Count Optimization:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=891
In addition, here is a good article about SSAS Best Practices for your reference:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc966525.aspx
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Hope this helps.
Elvis Long
TechNet Community Support

Reg: Using Multiple fact tables in the RPD!

Hello everyone,
Can I get some help with the following scenario?
We use OBIEE 11g.
We have a report that uses only 1 fact table to retrieve the data and it takes hell lot of time to bring up the data in the report.
My question here is is there a way to bring up the performance of the report if we split the data in 1 fact table to 2 fact tables and make the report use the 2 fact tables.
Are there any other ways of tuning the report for better performance.
Thanks for the help in advance!
Ajay.

Hi Ajay,
Follow the following steps for the tuning;
1. Try to tune the SQL query first generated by the report, and make necessary changes. (Put indexes on required column so that your query is scanning the index instead of entire table)
2. You can try to create agg fact table and use the agg navigation for improving the performance. (Idea is to reduce the data set on which sql is fired)
3. You can try to create partitions on the FACT table in the DB and so that required partitions are queried as per filters.
4. In the Last if all the above doesn't tune your query you can try splitting the FACT table in to TWO or More as per your decision and then use fragmentation content in the BMM layer of the RPD so it will hit appropriate tables as per you report.
Mark Correct/Helpful if it helps.
Best of Luck,
Kashi

Why is the FactAdditionalInternationalProductDescription a fact table in the AdventureworksDW2008R2 database?

Was wondering why this table is a fact table in the AdventureworksDW2008r2 database? It has no measures that I can tell.
Here is the schema for the table....
[ProductKey] [int] NOT NULL,
[CultureName] [nvarchar](50) NOT NULL,
[ProductDescription] [nvarchar](max) NOT NULL

Yes, I think it should be a dimension also.
The dimDate table has translation for month, dyas, etc in other languages. They don't put those translations in a fact table. Also, fact tables have measures, you can not perform math on those columns except maybe count...
The only thing I could think of is maybe it is some sort of intermidiate table... like if you have a many to many and need a one to many for SSAS, but still trying to wrap my head around some of these concepts.
I have just been studying this stuff for about a year or so, so wasn't sure. Studying for 70-463 hope to get MCSE someday too.
Mike

Updates to the table from the database level.

Hi Dear All,
If we do some updates to the table at the Database Level, like i deleted some records from the table at the Oracle level. But I'm still able to see the same deleted records from the Data Dictionary(SE11) at the application level.
Can you pl explain the mechanism, that how it is possible and why.
best regards
Mahesh

transparent tables store data directly....if you delete some data from transparent tables, the same is reflected in the database (oracle) but the reverse is not true...if you modify the database table contents directly...the dictionary table remains intact...
transparent tables have a one-to-one relationship with the database tables....
hope that clarifies a bit....
(somebody correct me if i am horribly wrong)

No fact table at the requested level error.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for