Planned Dep not posted for retired assets

Hi ,
We are running the asset depreication everymonth end, and it was posting without any errors.
But suddenly we found that some assets which we retired have still not posted the balance depreication and it is still reflecting in Planned Depreication in AW01N for previous months.
Eg: Asset retired on 29th of a month. Depreciation was not posted for this 29 days. and this balance still lies in planned depreication even after the depreciation run.
When i try to do a repeat run it gives an error message,
depreication for Peirod...... already posted.
As we have already run the depreciation, kindly suggest what best can be done without affecting the depreciation which is posted for other assets which is correct.
Thanks & Regards
Sanjay Marathe

Dear Ramesh,
Thanks for the update, i have got once more important information on this.
The problem lies only in one asset.
When they posted the depreiciation, in the actual run it gave a warning message that
" The posted depreciation and estimated depreciation are different" . But as the user was not aware regarding the Rerun and he has posted depreciation for subsequent periods.
And now it is not allowing to do a rerun for pervious periods.
Acq date :           9/11/2004
DOC       :           9/11/2004
Retirement date : 29/05/2007
useful life :          5yrs
Dep key LINR :     SLM from remaining life to book value zero.
Depreciation to the day is checked in the Dep Key
Exp useful life 2 years 161 days as on 31st march 2006
It was migrated on 1/4/2006 to SAP.
Points will be awarded.
Thanks & Regards
Sanjay Marathe

Similar Messages

Depreciation planned but not posted.

Hi all,
There is the following case.
In asset explorer there is planned depreciation which is not posted for prior year. I want to erase this planned depreciation (is incorrect) in prior year without affecting G/L. Could you please advise?
If this is to be made with ABSO and specific transaction type, could you please tell me setup of the transaction type?
Best Regards,
Kyriakos

Dear Kyriakos,
is this prior year closed in FI-AA already? If so, how were you able to close this fiscal year? This should be found as error by the fiscal year close report.
If the prior fiscal year is not closed, then you can either change the depreciation key to a non-calculating one (e.g. 0000) or set a shutdown indicator for the complete fiscal year. This should reduce the planned depreciation to zero. No posting or G/L entry is necessary therefor.
If the prior fiscal year should be already closed in FI-AA (still I would be wondering how you did that), you could use the solution provided in [SAP Note 29694|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/29694].
Hope this helps,
Markus

Excise Accounting document not generated for Imported Asset GR

Dear all,
Excise accounting document is not generated for imported asset goods receipt(MIGO)
but "C" Register part 2 no. is generated,usual accounting document is generated for GR,
Asset is Dr to GR/IR
Process is
1. Create asset purchase order with acct. assignment "A",
2. Customs miro based on p.o.
3. Do GR with excise
4. Post invoice for orginal vendor.
What will be cause of this problem ?
How to solve this issue ?

The above issue may be due to Accout assignmnet -A . Check your accout assignment in spro -mm-purchasing -accout assignment - Asset A - GR Non valuated has Ticked on . If it is ticked on - No Fi entry will happen at the Time of GR .
The reason being , if an FI entry happen for the first time , asset is capitalised . To avoid this GR is made in ur config as this .
rewdzzzz is full if correct
Edited by: manu m on Apr 24, 2010 11:11 AM

Accounting documents are not posted for Excise invoice

Hi,
1. The Excise invoice has been created with reference to F2 invoice but the accounting documents is not posted for excise invoice, what is the settings needs tobe maintained to post the accounting entries to excise invoice..?
2. where we will maintain number ranges for excise invoice..?
Thanks
Rao..

hi
1. The Excise invoice has been created with reference to F2 invoice but the accounting documents is not posted for excise invoice, what is the settings needs tobe maintained to post the accounting entries to excise invoice..?
Not sure but can u try to relese this to accounting
2. where we will maintain number ranges for excise invoice..?
Excise invoice number range is depend on Excise series group.
T-Code : SNRO
Following is the No. Range Objects related to Excise, select the proper no. range object as per your requirement.
J_1I57FC - 57FC Number Range
J_1IARE1 - ARE1 Doc No object based on Series Group
J_1IARE3 - ARE3 Doc No object based on Series Group
J_1IBOND - Excise Bonding: Bond number object
J_1ICERT - Withholding Tax Certificates (India)
J_1ICHLNNO - Internal number range for challans
J_1ICONPLA - Consolidated PLA serial no. generation
J_1IDEPINV - Excise Invoice Number for Depot Invoices
J_1IEXCEXP - Export excise invoice number range
J_1IEXCINV - Excise invoice number
J_1IEXCLOC - Local excise invoice numebr range
J_1IEXCTST - Excise invoice with intervals
J_1IEXINEX - Excise invoice number for export
J_1IINTNUM - Internally document number to be generated
J_1IINTPR2 - Despatch serial number
J_1ILIC - Excise Bonding: License number object
J_1IPLA2 - PLA part II number range object
J_1IRG1 - RG1 Number range object
J_1IRG1_T - No. Range for RG1 - Excise group / Material
J_1IRG23A1 - RG23A part 1 no. range object
J_1IRG23A2 - RG23A part II number range object
J_1IRG23C1 - RG23C part I number range object
J_1IRG23C2 - RG23C part II number range object
J_1IRG23D - Folio Numbers for RG 23D
Check the link
Re: Excise Invoice Number Range
excise invoice and domestic invoice sharing same number range

SPA3000 F/W 3.1.20(GW) last digit repetition within the dial plan is not working for gateway 0-4

H/W: SPA3000
F/W: 3.1.20(GW)
Problem: The last digit repetition within the dial plan is not working for gateway 0-4.
Line 1 Dial Plan: (****|<#,xx.<:@gw1>|1747xxxxxxxx.<:@gw1>)
Dial "17474743246#" which works for gw1.
Dial "#17474743246" which also works for gw1.
Dial "17474743246" which doesn't work and actually goes through VoIP 1 but not gw1.
It results in I have to specify a fixed number of digits for gw0-gw4 in the dial plan or it won't works. This could be very difficult for international calls.
Is there any way to specify Interdigit Short Timer with <:@gw0>?
BTW, it's strange that I have to include (****) in the dial plan to enter IVR. Without it I can't even hear any sound coming from gw1 (SIPphone). Maybe the SPA needs a factory reset. The test dial plan might look like,
S:4,(****|*xxx.|[2-9]|xxxxx|*0<:@gw1>|1747xxxxxxx<:@gw1>|1408xxxxxxx<:@gw0>|xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.!)
The last barring sequence "xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx!" is to make sure the Interdigit Short Timer works after the last digit dialed otherwise the number will be transmitted immediately which is not preferred.

IMHO , if there's a need for you to include *** on the dial plan to enter the IVR menu there might be a need to reset the unit.
I believe that you can set the interdigit timer by including that on the dial plan ie: xxxxS0 just like on a hotline, i just never had a chance to try including that syntax when invoking gw0 on the dial plan , but i guess you may give it a try.

Part 1 not Post for excess of qty

Hi.
I have one problem during STO
When i despetch 1 Material total of 108 KG in different batch say B1(40),B2(41) and B3(27)
I make delivery say DEL1
I make excise invoice say EXC1 for qty 108 for three batch
when i go for MIGO against outbound delivery DEL1 and enter excise invoice EXC! with Part 1 system shows me error message Part 1 not Post for excess GR qty
and in excise tab it shows qty for 1 batch only say B3 for all item tab.
Thanks & Regards
Chetan

Dear,
Two way,
1) Cancel Good receipt document with MIGO t-code and create new document for material receipt and capture part 1.
2) Go J1IEX - capture excise invoice against your material document.
Than post it with J1IEX.
Regards,
Mahesh Wagh

Capacity planning is not possible for this info structure

Hi Gurus,
When I create Rough cut planning profile, I am getting error message ""Capacity planning is not possible for this info structure""
I am using info structure S994 copied copied from standard info structure.
Please suggest to oversome this error.
thanks and regards
Murugesan

Hi,
Make sure the capacity planning relevant field is maintained for the Infostructure config setttings in MC7F.
regards
Ratan
Edited by: Ratan on Aug 10, 2009 7:49 PM

Depreciation not run for single asset-Why

Hi Experts,
Could anybody advise me why I am unable to run depreciation of single asset,(AFAB and repeat run used)
However.I can ran depreciation of all assets of the company code(all are working fine),
So Please suggest me how can I run depreciation for a single asset (Any specific configuration?)
Note:-
When I am checking AW01N I found depreciation of a asset has been posted for period-15(spl period)
But for other asset -depreciation has not been posted for period-15(showing planned only and revaluation amount also showin in plan ,done through AB01)
So I am trying to post the depreciation for the period -15,
So that after depreciation posting revaluation amount also can go in posted amount(revaluation amount showing in plan only as depreciation has not been posted for the period-15)
Please advise
Thanks and Regards

Hi,
As per standard SAP, depreciation can be run at company code level and not at asset level.
If you just want to check the nature of posting, you can give a single asset and run in 'Test Run' mode.
Regards,
Sridevi

Manual depreciation and Planned but not posted depreciation forwarded

HI Expert,
We would like to request for Product Enhancement for Fixed Asset Module due to the inconsistency in the computation for the following:
u2022 The planned and un-posted depreciation is already considered as confirm transaction when they compute for the accumulated depreciation to be forwarded next year (as well as net book value beg for next year)
u2022 But as for the no of months (remaining life) u2013 it will only consider the no of posted months when they compute for remaining life of the asset
The current feature of SAP affecting our enhancement request is as follows
1) Manual depreciation is currently validates manual depreciation based on Planned depreciation instead of Posted depreciation
2) Remaining life computation for next year depreciation is based on posted transaction only
3) When user wants to fully depreciate the asset, we cannot post depreciation based on remaining un-posted depreciation using manual depreciation
Based on this feature we want to request for the following enhancement
1) For the remaining un-posted depreciation (especially if the previous year is already close), we should be able to choose which month we want to post the un-posted depreciation
2) Since the remaining life computation is based on posted depreciation only, 1) the validation and 2) the net book value forwarded next year should also be based on posted depreciation
We have a sample computation based on current feature VS the suggested computation for SAP. Is there any way for us to import the file here at the forum? We will wait for your advice
Regards,
Amy

Dear Kyriakos,
is this prior year closed in FI-AA already? If so, how were you able to close this fiscal year? This should be found as error by the fiscal year close report.
If the prior fiscal year is not closed, then you can either change the depreciation key to a non-calculating one (e.g. 0000) or set a shutdown indicator for the complete fiscal year. This should reduce the planned depreciation to zero. No posting or G/L entry is necessary therefor.
If the prior fiscal year should be already closed in FI-AA (still I would be wondering how you did that), you could use the solution provided in [SAP Note 29694|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/29694].
Hope this helps,
Markus

Problem with depreciation posting for an asset with a '0' net book value.

Hi,
I have a problem with depreciation posting on one asset. I think it should not be calculated and posted at all.
On 1st November 2010 (our Fiscal year starts on 1st November) there was acquisition posted to an asset and then it was reversed on the same day - so the net book value was '0'.
In AFAB depreciation run for April 2011 - it posted depreciatoion of 0.01 Euro, so now the book value is -0.01.
Do you know how this could have happened and what can I do to get the value of this asset back to 0?
Thank you,
Karol

Hi Murlidhar,
Thank you for your reply.
I just have one doubt - as depreciation of 0.01 Eur was posted in previous period leaving net value of asset equal to -0.01 Eur.
Shouldn't I get ritd of this asset value before I proceed with the steps you suggested?
I think it is not possible to reverse the depreciation - so I struggle to find a way to bring asset value back to zero.
Thank you,
Karol

Help in CENVAT Posting for Import Asset Purchases

Dear All,
I have a Import Asset Purchase order that has excise posting.
Excise duty rates are:
HCESS 200
BASIC 200
CESS 200
SED 200
In Part 2 of Excising postings, I have the following entries:
HCESS 100
BASIC 100
CESS 100
SED 100
Current system will have the following accounting postings:
CENVAT Hold 400
HCESS 100
BASIC 100
CESS 100
CENVAT Clearing 400
I would like to know why the SED Posting was combined in the CENVAT HOLD.
Upon investigastion, the ETT for the PO is GRPO and subtransaction type of XX.
In configuration for specify GL Account for Excise transaction, the Account is also different to the one actually posted in accounting.
Customer also wants that for SED the Part 2 Posting should be 100 percent, so in the case above the Part 2 Posting should be 200 instead of 100.
So I have a bunch of errors, the accounting document posting is not posting in the correct GL account as configured. The SED Posting is being bundled with the CENVAT Hold and customer wants 100% Part 2 Posting of the SED Excise rate.
Appreciate if you could help.
Thank you!

hi
please check that u have main tained the gl accounts for subtransaction IP for ETT CAPE
check ur entry here
spro>Logistics - General>Tax on Goods Movements>India>Account Determination>Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction check combination of CAPE and IP is maintained here
CAPE IP Credit CENVAT clearing account
CAPE IP Debit CENVAT on hold account
CAPE IP Debit RG 23 AED account
CAPE IP Debit RG 23 AT1 Account
CAPE IP Debit RG 23 BED account
CAPE IP Debit RG 23 ECS Account
and then for Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction u have to maintain the GLs
also check that u have maintained the material type as A asset for the material in J1id
regards
kunal

Depreciation posting for Book Assets to Cost Center

Dear Friends,
We have upgraded from 4.70 version to ECC6.0 EHP4. Fixed Assets was not
implemented in 4.70. Now we are implementing Fixed Assets module in
ECC6.0.
We have copied the Standard Chart of Deprecition 0IN from Client 000
and renamed the same as BCLL: Chart of depreciation: BCLL.
I defined asset masters and maintained Cost center and Bus Area in the
Time Dependent area.
I maintained the configuration in Transaction Code ACSET for the
default Cost Center.
But while posting depreciation i.e. AFAB, the system is throwing error
and not posting to the Cost center defined in the asset master.
Hence I am maintaining the Default Cost center in OKB9 for depreciation
posting.
Please help me in resolving the issue.
Best Regards
Srinivas A

Dear Friends,
As pointed out by you, I have already activated the Account Assignment KOSTL and also maintained the Account Assignment Object in ACSET but the system is throwing the error "Account 4850 requires an assignment to a CO object", Message Number KI235.
The system is not posting to the Cost Center maintained in the Asset Master record.
Hence I posted to the Cost Center maintained in OKB9 but I understand this is not the correct appraoch.
Regards
Srinivas A

Excise Invoice is not posted for Part II

Hi,
During Excise Invoice Posting J1IEX_P the message--> Tax code V8 in procedure TAXINN is invalid
the message comes Tax code V8 is not defined for Tax procedure TAXINN , Where as so far we have not created tax code V8, and it is not there in the drop down list in FTXP & in PO Invoice tab tax code.
(Note --> I would like to inform you that the same message (V8 in procedure.......) was coming in the MIGO and giving the dump , before JMX1 Conditions were maintained, after maintaining the JMX1 , the message was not coming and material document saved with capture excise invoice.)
Awaiting reply & comments on this message.
Thanking you,
Manish Gupta

Check these two threads
[Re: ARE1 creation error - "excise Invoice is not meant for Exports|ARE1 creation error - "excise Invoice is not meant for Exports"]
[Re: ARE1 Error ''000005/2009 Excise Invoice is not meant for Export|Re: ARE1 Error ''000005/2009 Excise Invoice is not meant for Export"]
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Invoices not posted for accounting(Error:Max. no of items in FI is reached)

Dear Experts,
I have an issue in the billing document.It is not getting posted for Accounting even it is 23(230)and in some cases it is 30 lines line items in it.
It is shoing the error as Max. no of items in FI is reached.
This problem is in Production client only.As we have seen and checked the setting in all the client. It is same every where.
Could any one help.
The SAP help says:The number of accounting line items are restricted to 999 therefore your billing document line items should be significantly less than that to prevent a failure to post an accounting document.
There are two options open to you, one is to split the billing document automatically each time a maximum number of line items are reached, take a look at IMG > Billing >Country Specific Features > Maximum number of Billing Items, then in your copy control line item Data VBRK/VBRP include the following codeu201D

Hi,
Check Note 36353 'AC interface: Summarizing FI documents', it give you ideas as how you can avoid this big number of FI items.
I hope this helps you,
Regards,
Eduardo

FI DOCUMENT NOT POSTED FOR 201 MOVEMENT

HI ALL,
In one of the my client having one issue for particular one material ,FI document not posted ,while issue the goods to shop floor 201 movement type & same document we cancelled ,but FI document posted. Same cancellation document again cancelled.
How do we post / Release the same 201 Movement type material documet to FI. Due this my valuation agaisnt GL is inconsistency in MB5L AND MB5B report. Could u please help.
Rgds
SumaMani

Hi,
the following things have to be concidered for your issue
1. FI Document is not generated if the price of material is ZERO
2. check whether during the movement type 261 the material price is ZERO or not
3. Check whether during the cancellation of that document the material price is changed some how?
i my opinion during the 261 for that material that material price was Zero and no FI Document was generated and during the cancellation of that document that material has got some price so the FI Document was generated
Best Regards,
Ravi Reddy,

Planned Dep not posted for retired assets

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for