QM Inspection requirement?

Hi All,
We have a requirement as given below...
A vendor and/or a material must be selected (manually) and then this vendor or material
must be flagged at the goods receipt for quality inspection.
My client does not want to implement the quality inspection functionality in SAP QM. Can we achieve the above requirement in any way without QM inspection ?
Even a workaround would do.
Please guide...
Regards,
V S

One More Solution: -
First Create Good receipt with movement type 103 - Good receipt in Blocked stock.
After checking material quality then release material with movement type 105 - Good receipt from blocked stock to release stock.
Regards,
Mahesh Wagh

Similar Messages

SIP Inspection Required

Hi everyone,
Do I need to enable SIP inspection as per this article?
We're trying a proof-of-concept install for the Cisco Mobile iPhone client and the Cisco Cius, since we do not have any corporate WiFi we're utilising the AnyConnect clients that are available on both via our ASA5510 appliances that are running 8.3(1). However, we are unable to make calls via the VPN and find that the call initially rings but the call isn't fully setup when answered (The calling side will just continue to ring).
I'm seeing TCP connections (See attached syslog messages) being denied for port 5060 on the basis that there is no existing connection as the previous TCP connection is torn down. Hoping I can get some confirmation here before giving it a go.
Thanks,
Mark

Mark,
Normally you do not need to have inspection over VPN:
1) Typically you do not have NAT over VPN (typically!)
2) All the traffic is allowed over VPN by default (there is a sysopt for VPN traffic to ignore ACLs)
Now if it really is a problem of inspection, it's hard to say.
Did you try skinny instead of SIP? (Just out of curiosity).
Marcin

Sale Order / Project specific Inspection Plan

Dear All,
I want to create Sale order or Project specific inspection plan for a material. This is because, my customers want some specific inspection requirements for individual materials, which are assigned to Sale order or project. I want to inspect the material after receipt for these specific account assignments. I do not want to assign the customer because, my single customer may give different sale orders with different inspection requirements.
But in inspection plan, i can not see the assignment of sale order / project as i can see in Rate Routing.
Can anybody tell me about this?
Regards,
Prashant Kolhatkar

Create a Material ONE as Configurable Material. Assign 300 Class Type Class with Charcateristics created through CT04 Transaction which in turn linked to MICs.
Create another Material TWO with same Class but not configurable but is a Variant of Material ONE (MRP 3 View)
Maintain Configuration Profiles for both Materials.
In Material TWO, for insp. type details click on Insp. by Config indicator.
Whenever a Sales Order is created, maintain the requirements from the Customer in Characteristics and save the Sales Order. Against this Sales Order whenever a GR is made for respective Production Order inspection lot is created against the specifications given by Customer and not that maintained in inspection plan.
Best Regards,
K. Raghavendra Nayak

Help needed in PI sheet requirment

Hello Experts,
We have one specific requirement for PI sheet for our client (4.6 C)
The business want to sendquality information (inspection requirements ) like MIC, Insp. Method,Specifications etc. for 04 inspection lot and they want to see all these information in tabular format on PI sheet
In SAP, there is no standard way to generate instructions for GR inspection characteristics . SO we planned to use user exit to populate the characteristics values in instruction category for inspection.
If we use Repeated data request and table size, we could only populate first MIC and its related information in first row of table and it is getting repeated for multiple rows ( Exit is getting called only once).
We cannot create multiple instructions for each MIC as well , since it will generate individual table for each one .
Has anyone worked on such requirement before ? Any help will be appreciated
Thanks,
Sachin C

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fucntion_name(latA IN NUMBER, longA IN NUMBER, latB IN NUMBER, longB IN NUMBER) RETURN NUMBER
IS
pi CONSTANT NUMBER:=3.14159;
theta NUMBER;
distX NUMBER;
distY NUMBER;
distZ NUMBER;
distP NUMBER;
BEGIN
theta :=longA - longB;
distX :=sin( latA * PI /180) * sin ( latB * PI /180) + cos ( latA * PI/180) * cos ( latB * PI/180) * cos ( theta * PI / 180);
distY :=acos(distX); --this is arc cosine
distZ :=distY * 180/PI; --PI refers to the mathematical PI
distP :=distZ * 60 * 1.1515; --this value should be returned. Of course the intermediate variable names don't matter.
RETURN distP;
END;Edited by: Ora on May 3, 2011 11:46 PM

With 10% inspection lot has to be created

HI
after procurement of rawmaterial against the purchase requisitionby posting with 101 mvt type lot has to be created with 10%
(ex:if 100 kgs we procured lot has to created in quality with 10 kgs
what is the way
explain
thank u in advance

Hi Senthil,
Follow the Below step.
1. Go to QDR1 enter 3char header Press enter.
2. In 2nd screen Enter Decrip and Choose At Lot Creation and Enter reset period 9999
3. Click -> (Arrrow in Top) It will going to New screen.
Create 2 Stage One for Inspection and 2nd for Skip
Stge:1, Insp Sev 4, Tick Ist Enter Description as Inspection required and press enter.
In another small popup screen enter no of Inspection 1 (Bcz your case after 1 Inspection go to SKIP), New Stage as 2, Rej 1, New 1,
Stage2, Tick in SKIP, and Maintain No Skip as 4 (Bcz your case You need inspection after 4 lot) New Stage 1 (Bcz after complete the 4 lot it will go to 1st stage for Inspection.), Rej 1 , New Insp 1.
Save.
Then attach the same thing to Quality Inspection Plan QP01
In Header Detail Screen (2 nd screen) Choose DMR at lot level and assign the your created DMR.
For any query revert.
Regards,
S.Babusingh

Source inspection configuration

dear all,
what is source inspection and vendor evaluation, please give me details of configuration steps for it.
thanks in advance

*What is Source Inspection*
What is source inspection and what are the setup required to do in system to implement successfully?
A source inspection is a quality inspection in which Buyer required the quality check before the material received. So that he performed the quality inspection at the vendoru2019s Location.
To setup source inspection, you should define inspection type (01 and 0101) in material master QM View. (MM01)
When requesting source inspection, include the following information:
a) Purchase order number
b) Item number
c) Part number
d) Quantity of parts to be inspected
e) Date source inspection is required
f)   Types of inspection required
     - In Process
     - Final
     - Interim
     - First Article Inspection (FAI)
g) Contact name and phone number
Go to transaction QI07 and give the material code, vendor, plant and opening period. When you execute the transaction you would find open purchase orders for the given input data. Select the Purchase Order you wish to perform Source Inspection and choose Create Inspection Lot. These inspection lot triggers for inspection type 0101. Against this inspection Lot perform result recording QE01 & QA11.
When finally you received Goods at your premises, then inspection lot will triggered automatically (01) and perform result recording QE01 & QA11
        How to do Source Inspection in QM
Can any one guide how to do Source Inspection in QM. What are the settings required to be done and can the lot for source inspection be trigerred manually or automatically.
The Q-Info Record is used to trigger a source inspection lot for a material/vendor and plant. Under the tab key Inspection Control in Q-Info Record, you would find vendor source Inspection and under that select the inspection type desired for source inspection (say 01,0101) and give the lead time required to perform the inspection in days (say 10 days). If you do not want to trigger an inspection lot @ GR for a source Inspection lot then check the box (Source Insp. No Gr).
Ensure that the inspection type selected @ source inspection is activated in the Material Master Record for the chosen material in the Quality Management View.
To trigger the lot manually you need to have some open purchase orders for the material/plant/vendor. Go to transaction QI07 and give the material code,vendor,plant and opening period. When you execute the transaction you would find open purchase orders for the given input data. Select the Purchase Order you wish to perform S.I and choose Create Inspection Lot.
This would trigger the lot and then it is QE01 & QA11.
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion     Key 01 Key 02
Price                   1      5
Quality                 1      5
Delivery                1      2
Gen. service/support    1      1
Ext. service provision 1      2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.

Doing GR for a material type, system should give a message like QI required

Dear Friends
While doing MIGO(GR) for a material type, system should give a message like Quality Inspection required
but Client requirement is not to maintain QM view or Inspection Type 01for material type
Any setting required
Thanks & Regards
Gajendranath

Hi
Please check user exit QBCK0003 |Extended QM check for goods receipt
Regards
sujit

Delivery - Quality Inspection Issue

Dear Gurus,
I have the following scenario where system works fine, but required an alternate solution for client.
I have a valuated material, if there is no stock system can generate the sales order and than delivery, although cant possible for PGI, so my user generate shipment with referenc eto delivery number. and when stock come pgi can possible.
at the other scenario..
inspection is active on the material, but there is no stock, and as per client, they call the tuck inside the org. territory with reference to shipment number when when stock available they process the delivery.
But here when i create delivery with reference to order system even cant bring to me on delivery screen, so no process starts futher and due to no stock and inspection required the qty hold the outbond delivery.
"Error creting inspection lot for material xyz".
Looking for the gurus response, that is there any possibility to avoid inspection qty message, so that i can save and get the delivery number for further processing.
Thanks.

Correct dear,
kindly read my scenario again.
QM view is on, but i still wants that system generate atleast outbond delivery document number.

R12 PO Inspection vs. Quality Skip Lot

We have been performing PO inspections without the Quality module for over 10 years. There is project to move many of our key suppliers to an Evaluated Receipt Settlement program. The accounting folks want to throw these suppliers into some sort of Skip Lot process. However it appears that to go in this direction all Inspection Required receipts will now have to have a Quality Plan associated to it. Is this true? Is there anyway to commingle the two inspection methods?
Thanks in advance!

Hi Rahul
You may need to set following to meet your need,
1. In Quality Collection Plan Set Item Inspection required - for a Particular Supplier or Supplier + Site
this will invoke Quality plan only if above conditions meet and hence it will feed this to skiplot engine.
Skiplot engine is designed with skipping lot, irrespective of mode of receiving materials.
Hope this helps.
Any questions let me know
Cheers
Kamal
0044-7533787829

Error in creation of Phantom item bill

Hi Gurus,
We have planned to use phantom item. for that wehave created an item of type: 'option class'. Then created its routing but facing below error when trying to cretae bill for phantom item.
Kindly help me out
Regards,
Ali Raza
APP-FND-01048: Use of this combination restricted by WHERE clause ' ( ((:parameter.query_mode = 2 AND bom_enabled_flag = 'Y') OR (:parameter.query_mode = 1 AND EXISTS (SELECT NULL FROM bom_bill_of_materials bom WHERE bom.organization_id = :parameter.org_id AND bom.assembly_item_id = inventory_item_id AND ((:parameter.bom_or_eng = 1 AND assembly_type = 1) OR :parameter.bom_or_eng = 2) ))) AND (bom_item_type in (:parameter.model_item_access, :parameter.planning_item_access, :parameter.std_item_access, :parameter.oc_item_access) ) AND ((:parameter.bom_or_eng = 1 AND eng_item_flag = 'N' AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT 'X' FROM bom_bill_of_materials bom WHERE bom.organization_id = :parameter.org_id AND bom.assembly_item_id = inventory_item_id AND bom.alternate_bom_designator IS NULL AND bom.assembly_type <> 1) AND (:parameter.eam_type is null OR (:parameter.eam_type in (1, 2, 3)
APP-FND-01388: Cannot read value for profile option FND_INDICATOR_COLORS in routine &ROUTINE.

Hi Sandeep,
Thanks for your reply.
I have checked all three possibilities. Item is not Engineering item and already assigned to Org. Also the BOM doesnot exist. Kindly note that I donot have any issue in creating bill of a standard item. We are using phantom item for the first time so tell me if phantom item need some special setup or some profile option to be active etc? I am using below attributes in inventory. Kindly go through it and suggest.
Deviation Factor +     0
Deviation Factor -     0
Shelf Life Days     0
Price Tolerance %     0
Acceptable Rate -     0
Acceptable Rate +     0
Postprocessing Lead Time     0
Planning Time Fence Days     1
Lead Time Lot Size     1
Descriptive Flexfield     ---------
Item Status     Active
Conversions     Both standard and item specific
Forecast Control     Consume Forecast
Effectivity Control     Date
Service Request     Enabled
RMA Inspection Required     Inspection not required
Default SO Source Type     Internal
Restrict Locators     Locators restricted to pre-defined list
Make or Buy     Make
Billing Type     Material
Cycle Count Enabled     No
Check Material Shortage     No
Lot Split Enabled     No
Lot Merge Enabled     No
Lot Translate Enabled     No
Lot Substitution Enabled     No
Bulk Picked     No
Engineering Item     No
EAM Notification Required     No
Use Approved Supplier     No
Taxable     No
Allow Description Update     No
RFQ Required     No
Outside Processing Item     No
Equipment     No
Planned Inventory Point     No
Repetitive Planning     No
Build in WIP     No
Customer Ordered     No
Customer Orders Enabled     No
Internal Ordered     No
Internal Orders Enabled     No
OE Transactable     No
Assemble to Order     No
Ship Model Complete     No
Financing Allowed     No
Invoiceable Item     No
Invoice Enabled     No
Enable Contract Coverage     No
Enable Defect Tracking     No
Lot Control     No lot control
Serial Number Generation     No serial number control
Lot Expiration     No shelf life control
End Assembly Pegging     None
Check ATP     None
ATP Components     None
Safety Stock     Non-MRP planned
Inventory Planning Method     Not planned
MRP Planning Method     Not planned
Primary Unit of Measure     NUMBER
BOM Item Type     Option class
WIP Supply Type     Phantom
User Item Type     Phantom item
Locator Control     Prespecified locator control
Tracking UOM Indicator     Primary
Pricing UOM Indicator     Primary
Reservable     Reservable
Restrict Subinventories     Subinventories restricted to pre-defined list
Description     TEST FG
Revision Control     Under revision quantity control
Planning Time Fence     User-defined time fence
Inventory Item     Yes
Stockable     Yes
Transactable     Yes
BOM Allowed     Yes
Costing Enabled     Yes
Inventory Asset Value     Yes
Include in Rollup     Yes
Purchased     Yes
Purchasable     Yes
Receipt Required     Yes
Create Supply     Yes
Shippable     Yes
Pick Components     Yes
Returnable     Yes
Enable Service Billing     Yes
Regards,
Ali Raza

How to handle Packing, Frieght etc., additional charges on PO as separate lines - not looking for LCM

Hi,
Following is Business requirement given by client
1.Create Item ( say item code : PACKING CHARGES ) as Purchasable only ( non-stockable )
2.Invoice Match Option in Purchasing Tab of Item is : Receipt Required : No , Inspection Required : No
3.Receipt Close Tolerance is : 100% in Item setup > Purchasing Tab ( Client don't want this line to appear in Receipt Screen )
4.PO Created with two lines one is Inventory Item and second line is PACKING CHARGES
5.As soon as PO is approved Second line got closed for Receiving , First line is the only line visible in Receipt Screen
6.Receipt and Delivery is completed for Inventory item
7.Invoice is entered > Matched > Validated > generate accounting entries is also successfully completed
8.PO is still with Closure Status : Open at header level
9.Inventory Item Closed Status is Closed , PACKING CHARGES line is still with status Ope
Expectation is the PO Closure Status should go to Closed , since we have completed Invoice matching and account generation and there is nothing pending to be done.
Please help.
If you have any Test case document or document explaining similar case with accounting entries, this will be a great help.
Regards
Anil

Hi Anil,
I tried your test case here and below are my inferences.
a) At the time of PO Creation, the packaging item selected will be close for receiving.
b) The Item will be available for matching only if the Invoice Line type is Item, and the controls are defined as 3 Way Match Level with PO match option.
c) Before attempting to match this line, the match level at invoice must be changed to PO.
d) This line will not be created as a freight or packaging line, but it will be an item line type.
These inferences point to the fact that the mapping is not correct. By the book, freight or any other misc charges are finalized only when the item is received and not at PO creation.
Which means that the PO should have the only the item which is being procured and not the charges as separate line items.
At the time of creation of the Invoice, while matching you have an option to check the Freight/ Miscellaneous check box, which gives you a popup to enter the value of the Freight and associated cost type.
By adding this, system adds a new invoice line with the type freight/ misc and puts the additional amount incurred as charges there which is the correct behavior.
Please discuss with the customer and update us based on above facts.
Rgds,
Abhi

Sample Size Calculation based on the results

Dear all
I have a scenario as below
for a product the upper and lower specification is given as below
Upper spec 19.00mm
Standard 18.00mm
Lower spec 17.00mm
my client is having ranges as below
Range 1
Upper spec 19.0 to 18.75
Lower spec 17.0 to 17.25
Range 2
Upper spec 18.75 to 18.50
Lower spec 17.25 to 17.50
Range 3
Upper spec 18.50 to 18.25
Lower spec 17.50 to 17.75
Range 4
Upper spec 18.25 to 18.00
Lower spec 17.75 to 18.00
a) Initially the sample size is 50%. Starts with range 4 .
b) if consecutive 5 receipts are ok we want to switch to range 3 - sample size 25%.
c) if consecutive 5 receipts are ok we want to switch to range 2 sample size 10%
e) and range 1 sample size 5%.
f) if there is any rejection at any range, then reset to range 4.
g) if out of specification noticed then the next incoming material will be inspection in the next lowest range. ie in range 1 out of specification noticed shift to range 2 in the next Goods receipt.
I know that Sampling scheme can be used but how to link the specifications in it.
How to link this in SAP QM.
awaiting for your valuable feed back Please.
Regard
P.Srihari

Hi Sri,
As per your requirement you have to create 4 MIC as well as 4 DMR follow the below step.
1. Create MIC1,MIC2,MIC3,MIC4
2. Create DMR1,DMR2,DMR3,DMR4
3. Assign the DMR at MIC level.
a) Go to QP01 In Header data screen choose Dynamic mod. level DMR at character level. (Don't assign any DMR here)
b) In Characteristics screen assign DMR to MIC
(Range1) MIC1 - DMR1
(Range2) MIC2 - DMR2
(Range3) MIC3 - DMR3
(Range4) MIC4 - DMR4
Save the Inspection plan.
DMR detail explaination
As per your requirement MIC4 will be initially inspected (ie: range 4) and remaing MIC all are after 5 consecutive lots if any rej at any stage again inspect the Range4.
DMR1: Create 2 Stage (1st is SKIp 2nd is Inspection)
Stage1: Start with Initial stage, Tick in SKIP, and Maintain No Skip as 15 (Bcz your case You need this MIC1 after 15 lot (555)), Skip duration 999 (Bcz your case days not consider) New Stage 2 (Bcz after complete the 15 lot it will go to 2nd stage for Inspection.), Rej 1 , New Insp 1 (Bcz rejected means MIC1 is not required)
Stge:2, Insp Sev 4, Ist Enter Description as Inspection required and press enter.
In another small popup screen enter no of Inspection 5 , New Stage as 2, Rej 1, New 1,
DMR2: Create 2 Stage (1st is SKIp 2nd is Inspection)
Stage1: Start with Initial stage, Tick in SKIP, and Maintain No Skip as 10 (Bcz your case You need this MIC2 after 10 lot (5+5)), Skip duration 999 (Bcz your case days not consider) New Stage 2 (Bcz after complete the 10 lot it will go to 2nd stage for Inspection.), Rej 1 , New Insp 1 (Bcz rejected means MIC2 is not required)
Stge:2, Insp Sev 4, Ist Enter Description as Inspection required and press enter.
In another small popup screen enter no of Inspection 5 , New Stage as 1, Rej 1, New 1,
DMR3: Create 2 Stage (1st is SKIp 2nd is Inspection)
Stage1: Start with Initial stage, Tick in SKIP, and Maintain No Skip as 5 (Bcz your case You need this MIC3 after 5 lot ), Skip duration 999 (Bcz your case days not consider) New Stage 2 (Bcz after complete the 5 lot it will go to 2nd stage for Inspection.), Rej 1 , New Insp 1 (Bcz rejected means MIC3 is not required)
Stge:2, Insp Sev 4, Ist Enter Description as Inspection required and press enter.
In another small popup screen enter no of Inspection 5 , New Stage as 1, Rej 1, New 1,
DMR4: Create 2 Stage (1st is Inspection 2nd is Skip)
Stge:1, Insp Sev 4, Start with Intial stage Ist Enter Description as Inspection required and press enter.
In another small popup screen enter no of Inspection 5 , New Stage as 2, Rej 1, New 1,
Stage2: Tick in SKIP, and Maintain No Skip as 999 , Skip duration 999 (Bcz your case days not consider) New Stage 2, Rej 1 , New Insp 1 (Bcz rejected means again inspect the MIC4)
Note: Read step by step.
Revert further clarification.
Regards,
S.Babusingh

Material Availabilty Date Determination in Sales Order

Hi Gurus,
When creating the sales order, if stock is not available then how the material availability date is determined.
What are the inputs the system consider for calculating the material availability date.
Even though I am giving the total replenishment leadtime, Inhouse processing time(Lot size independent), GR processing time and even the planned delivery time, the system proposing the current date as material availability date irrespective of the sales order quantity.
All responses will be rewarded suitably.
Thanks and Regards,
Jejesh.
Edited by: jejesh yal on Sep 12, 2008 6:33 PM

Available checking rule in SD.
It depends on the Availability group you have maintained in material master.
The checking rule specifies the scope of the availability check for the respective transactions in sales and distribution by specifying precisely which stocks, receipt and issue elements should be taken into account during the availability check.
Every checking rule is allocated to a checking group: together these two elements determine the final inspection requirements. In addition, the checking rule includes a specification whether or not an availability check should take into account the replenishment lead time ( i.e. Total time for the in-house production or for the external procurement of a product. In in-house production the replenishment lead time is determined to cover all BOM levels.)
Items for which the delivery date falls within the replenishment lead time, but for which there is no inventory, are confirmed for delivery after the replenishment lead time. In the case of items for which the delivery date falls after the end of the replenishment lead time, the system assumes that everything can be confirmed.
If you want the system to check the replenishment lead time, you should make sure that you have entered a value in at least one of the following three fields in the material master:
GR (goods receipt) processing time (Purchasing view)
Planned delivery time (MRP I view)
GR processing time (MRP II view)
Otherwise, the system confirms every requirement.
Ava checking group what you have maintained in material master and the checking rule for SD (in std system is A)
--combination of above will decide how the ava check to be carried out and decide the delivery date. This sitting is available in SPRO in OVZ9.
If you carry out the availability check using the replenishment lead time, you should plan ahead in regular intervals (on a daily basis for individual and daily requirements, on a weekly basis for weekly requirements) to prevent a shortage and therefore a possible delivery block. This shortage could occur if the delivery date of a sales order, which was confirmed the previous day for the replenishment lead time, is already within the replenishment period on the current day and therefore results in a shortage.
Hence,
1. Check the configurations for the checking groups which are contained in the standard SAP R/3 System.
2. Make sure that the checking group is maintained in the material master records. Depending on the plant, you can specify a checking group for each material type
3. Select the individual stock elements as well as the receipts and issues which should be taken into account during the availability check.
4. Select the field for replenishment lead time if you do NOT want to take the replenishment lead time into account.
Depending on above setting delivery date will e determined or delivery block in case no qty available can be designed.

Work flow in DMS

Dear Expert,
can anybody tell me the solution for the below scenario.
1-i want to attach few documents to WBS elements in PS.
2-Project manager should get one mail automatically after i attach the document.
3-Then Project manager has to change the status of the document like 'approved' or 'rejected'.
4-after that automatically a mail should flow to the responsible person with a comment.
How to map this scenario.
can anybody tell me?
Thanx in advance.
Regards
Ashis

Hi Ashis
1-i want to attach few documents to WBS elements in PS.
Suppose User A Creates a DIR Name Proj109 .I particular status he Links it to a project called D3017.As soon as he saves DIR and Changes the status to Inspection required a workflow should triggered to the Project Manager.Now Project Manager should be identified from the Proj D3017 to which Document is linked.
2-Project manager should get one mail automatically after i attach the document.
After receiving workflow Item in Business Workplace(SBWP), he clicks the Object(DIR Proj109)en sent as link.This will direct him to DIR.
3-Then Project manager has to change the status of the document like 'approved' or 'rejected'.
Once he arrives at DIR Proj109 from workitem, he will change status of document to approve or rejected
Once he saves the DIR, again a workflow will be triggered to the person who has created document ( If rejected) or person who is receiver of DIR (Approved).
4-after that automatically a mail should flow to the responsible person with a comment.
You can provide comments in workflow based on what status you have given to document.
example :- If DIR is rejected you can hardcode comment DIR is Rejected. Please check the DIR. or a text field can be provided in workflow to put comments.
My suggestion would be pen own your process in a Logical manner in MS Visio with detail steps in workflow with the person involved and when workitem should get triggered on what action.This will help your workflow consultant to design workflow in quicker and acurate way.
Hope I have answered in better way.
With regards
Mangesh Pande

Updating Receipt Routing in PO Shipments

          Hello all,
          I am looking for any option to update Receiving_routing_id in the table PO_LINE_LOCATIONS_ALL except the base table update( since it is not supported ).
          So far I have explored following options.
          1. Use of PDOI program to update receipt routing from Direct Receipt to Inspection Required but PDOI doesn't touch Open PO releases so I doubt this will work.
          2. Personalization on Receipt form to change the receipt routing
          Please suggest me any other alternative if you know. This is highly important for us to get the solution. Thanks in advance.

Can you explain with some more details ?

QM Inspection requirement?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for