SXMB_MONI time difference in performance header

Hi,
I've noticed the time in the performance header trace in sxmb_moni is 5 hours later than the real time (System time).
Even the time sent is 5 hours later. Exp :
<SAP:TimeSent>2009-11-24T21:13:09Z</SAP:TimeSent>
When it was actualy sent at 16:13:09 ?
However , the start and end time in the alv list for sxmb_moni is correct.
I've seen the other thread on user preferences (timezone) but this is not it ... any ideas ?
Thanks Guys

Dear Thierry,
the reason for this difference in time is that the PerformanceHeader object needs to be filled with continous values. Discontinuities (for example, caused by daylight-saving time) might lead to tremendous deviations. Thus, timezone UTC is used to store performance data to that header object. Timezone UTC is also used for storing dates and time to the trace header object.
Best regards,
Harald Keimer
XI Development Support
SAP AG, Walldorf

Similar Messages

  • Stopping a while loop using the time difference of two tick counts

    Hi Guys,
    I'm currently writing a code which test how long does it take for a formula node to perform its operation. The program uses a while loop to perform the calculation, and the program stops after calculating when tick count has reached 10 seconds. The program then displays the number of iterations it does in 10 seconds. 
    So initially I created 2 frames of sequence structure. In my first frame I have my initial tick count, and in my second frame I have my final tick count and the while loop. I used the subtract function and divide the output by 1000 to get the time difference. Then using the comparison function, I set if output > 10 then the program should stop, to do this I linked the output of the comparison function to the stop button inside the while loop. 
    However, when I tried to run the code, the program just didn't run. Hence I created a similar program which puts the last tick count in new frame sequence. When I ran this code, the program never stopped. 
    Do you guys have any idea what went wrong with my codes.
    Thank you!
    Erry
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.
    Attachments:
    1. Tick Count.vi ‏27 KB
    tickcoun2.vi ‏27 KB

    Dataflow!
    In both VI's the stop terminal of the while loop is controlled by a boolean whose source is ouside of the while loop.  So that loop will either run once, or run forever, depending on the value of the boolean that is calculated before the loop starts and shows up at the tunnel going into the loop.
    I would recommend looking at the online LabVIEW tutorials
    LabVIEW Introduction Course - Three Hours
    LabVIEW Introduction Course - Six Hours

  • Time differences between camera and iMovie

    Hi,
    When I import footage from my Mini-DV camera into iMovie I am seeing a difference between the time displayed on the tape and time displayed in iMovie. The camera says 48 seconds while iMovie says 44 seconds. I thought that it might be related to the framerate of the video in iMovie, but I have changed this to 25 fps which matches the video camera and am still seeing a different time. The framerate needs to be perfect as the footage is going to be shown side-by-side with a animated graph which builds with time.
    Does anyone have any idea what could cause this time difference?
    Thanks

    < scratching head > we had something about a NTSC/PAL issue.. hmm.. ?
    if possible, open an existing PAL project (window titles says DV-PAL), save it under a diff. name, import into that project, delete the not wanted parts..
    another option is, quit iMovie, delete ~/Library/Preferences any com.apple.iMovie.plist file.. relaunch iM.. that 'resets' iM... sometimes, it starts to stumble..

  • Performance header in message monitoring

    Hello
    I have scenario XI -> synch RFC Receiver.
    In message monitoring I select response message and performance header part.
    There are entries:
    INBOUND, Request MAPPING, OUTBOUND, CALL ADAPTER, Response MAPIING
    Does this time include RFC call through RFC Adapter?
    Or it includes only IE processing like mapping.
    What will include the time: <b>last time entry - first time entry</b>?
    Whill it equal: request mappingRFC callresponse mapping?

    Hi Denis,
    the best way to monitor the performance
    is the performance monitor tab in RWB
    have you tried it?
    you can monitor single interfaces and
    also aggeregated
    Regards,
    michal

  • Concatenating date and time and then performing time calucations on this

    Hi,
    I have complex date/time calculation to perform in QD. Scenario is as follows:
    Objective: I want to calculate the difference in hours:mm:ss between the start order time and the end order time
    1. I have two fields one date & one time for each startorder time and an endorder time.
    2. I want to combine these together to get a date & time field for both startorder and endorder
    3. I want to calculate the difference between these 2 fields (datetime-start order & datetime- end order) to find the difference in hours:mm:ss
    Question is this possible in QD if so how?
    Or if it not possible in QD then is it possible in the transformation, if so how?
    thanks.

    Hi Amir,
    In the QD it only possible to get the date difference using replacement path and time difference cannot be calculated.
    You can achieve this by writing a routine at transformations level. You need to call a function module to time difference.
    /SDF/CMO_DATETIME_DIFFERENCE
    SD_DATETIME_DIFFERENCE.
    Hope this helps.............
    Rgs,
    Ravikanth.I

  • How to solve the problem with time difference?

    Hi,
    I work in India with time difference about 12 hours faster than American time.
    I put a validation in my application as follows:
    IF :P2_FINISH_DATE > SYSDATE THEN
    return false;
    else
    return true;
    end if;
    Today (13-Mar-09) at 9:30 am according to my system, I entered 13-Mar-09 as FINISH_DATE.
    But it returned false with an error message: "Finish date cannot be greater than system date."
    I changed my system time as 13-Mar-09, 9:30 pm. Then it accepted 13-Mar-09 as FINISH_DATE.
    How can I solve this issue.
    Would appreciate your help.
    Thanks,
    Guy

    Hi Arie,
    Thanks for the code.
    Your code works perfect in SQL Commands.
    But I don't know how to use the code in my application.
    Would appreciate if you can help me know the followings:
    - How to define two application processes -- before header and after submit (before any processing) – with the proper alter session statement.
    - How to use the APEX VPD field to do the same.
    FYI, I use the following codes:
    - For file upload
    If (:p2_SUBMIT_FILE is not null) then
    insert into PM_DOCUMENT (id, name, blob_content, mime_type, PROJECT_NAME, SUBMIT_TIME, SUBMITTED_BY)
    select id, :p2_SUBMIT_FILE, blob_content, mime_type, :P2_NAME, SYSDATE , :P2_UPDATED_BY
    from apex_application_files
    where NAME = :p2_SUBMIT_FILE;
    Delete from apex_application_files where name = :p2_SUBMIT_FILE;
    end if;
    - For Data entry validation
    IF :P2_START_DATE > :P2_FINISH_DATE
    OR :P2_START_DATE > :P2_TARGET_DATE
    OR :P2_FINISH_DATE > SYSDATE THEN
    return false;
    else
    return true;
    end if;
    Thanks,
    Guy

  • How much time difference allowable in ntpdate

    I gave the command ntpdate on 1 RHEL machine with reference to another RHEL machine like,
    ntpdate –b <machine 2>
    from machine 1 and time difference supposedly was less than 1 min between machine 1 and machine 2.
    But, I have got error like ‘ntpdate[5771] no server suitable for synchronization found’. This raises few queries like:
    1) How much time difference is allowable between 2 machines to sync? Is it that the difference should be less than 1 second?
    2) What are the pre-requisites to use the ntpdate command so that the operation can be performed smoothly.
    I hope, my question is clear.
    Please revert with the reply to my query.
    Regards

    1) The clocks must be within 600 seconds (10 minutes).  The idea is that you set the clock by your wristwatch to get "close enough" and then use ntpdate to actually set the time.
    2) Mostly, you must have connectivity from your client to the NTP server; firewalls opened for port 123; and the NTP server must be allowed to send time to the client and the client must be allowed to receive the time.  This is what all those nasty restrict lines in /etc/ntp.conf are for.
    11

  • Time Difference with Desktop Intelligence XI

    Post Author: tknight
    CA Forum: Desktop Intelligence Reporting
    I have 2 date time fields
    Starttime: = mm/dd/yyyy HH:MM:SS AM/PM
    Stoptime: = mm/dd/yyyy HH:MM:SS AM/PM
    I would like to compare the actual time difference between them.  Unfortunately Daysbetween() doesn't cut it because it returns an integer for the actual days between.  I need the number of hours/minutes. 
    For Example:
    Starttime = 03/27/2008 01:00:00 PM
    Stoptime = 03/27/2008 01:15:00 PM
    =Daysbetween(Starttime,Stoptime) returns "0"
    I need my variable to return eith 15 minutes or 0:15  (read 0 hours and 15 minutes).  Any thoughts?

    Post Author: jsanzone
    CA Forum: Desktop Intelligence Reporting
    tknight,
    There is no function for minutes that is comparable to DaysBetween, so you'll have to perform the work of "minutes between" in SQL using Designer....

  • Difference in performance MXML and XHTML pages

    We are testing with the beta 904 release. I've build the same application in MobileXML as in XHTML. There seems to be a big difference in performance if I load the pages XHTML. MXML renders much faster.
    The header of the XHTML pages looks like this (with enabled caching):
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    <%@ page contentType="application/vnd.oracle.xhtml+xforms; charset=UTF-8" %>
    <%@ page language="java" %>
    <%@ page import='java.util.*' %>
    <%@ page errorPage="ErrorPage.jsp"%>
    <jsp:useBean id="UserDetails" scope="session" class="nl.transiciel.asw.UserDetails" />
    <jsp:setProperty name="UserDetails" property="*" />
    <%
    // response.setHeader("Cache-Control", "no-store");
    // response.setHeader("Pragma", "no-cache");
    // response.setHeader("Expires", "0");
    request.setCharacterEncoding("UTF-8");
    %>
    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:xf="http://www.w3.org/2002/xforms/cr"
    xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xmlns:demo="http://xf-demo.oracle.com"
    xmlns:ev="http://www.w3.org/2001/xml-events"
    xmlns:mxml="http://xmlns.oracle.com/2002/MobileXML"
    profile="http://xmlns.oracle.com/ias/dtds/xhtml+xforms/0.9.0/1.0"
    xmlns:extra="urn:oracle:iasw-internal:mxml.1.0"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml ../../xsd/xhtml1.1.xsd">
         <head>
    Are there ways (instead of buying a new server with a faster CPU) to improve the performance of the XHTML pages?
    The MXML page header looks like this:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <%@ page contentType="text/vnd.oracle.mobilexml; charset=UTF-8" %>
    <%@ page errorPage="ErrorPage.jsp"%>
    <%@ page import="java.util.*" %>
    <jsp:useBean id="UnitDetailsBeanId" scope="session" class="aswe.UnitDetailsBean" />
    <jsp:setProperty name="UnitDetailsBeanId" property="*" />
    Any suggestions?

    Hi,
    There were performance bottlenecks that were identified since beta 4 that have subsequently been resolved. These should be made available in the production release.
    Regards,
    Deepak

  • Time difference between the Identity system and Access System: OAM

    I was installing OAM. Performed the below steps.
    -installed identity server
    -installed webpass
    -setup of identity system console
    -installed policy manager
    -setup of access system console
    The above steps were successfull. Then when i was logging into Access system console, i am getting the below error:
    Error:there was a problem obtaining the userid. One possible reason for this is a time difference between the Identity system and Access systems (Policy Manager and Access system console).+
    The Identity Server, WebPass and Policy Manager are installed on the same machine.
    Userdata repository: OVD 10.1.4.3
    Policy and Config Data Repository: OID 11.1.1.3
    OAM: 10.1.4.3
    Windows2008 - 64bit
    Found document in metalink similar to this issue. suggested to change ldapmaxofreties. but didn't help.
    Any idea on this error. Please Advise.
    Thanks in advance.

    Try this::
    Check Time Difference Between Identity and Access Manager Systems
    Check the logfile in the Access Manager install directory. The default location is <$AMinstall_dir>/access/oblix/logs/oblogfile.
    If the file exists and it contains following line "skew = slack = " that means the Identity and Access Manager Web Servers are on different machines and have not synchronized time within a minute.
    Either synchronize times between the two machines within a minute's accuracy or you can increase the slack by modifying these two files: <$AMinstall_dir>/access/oblix/apps/common/bin/oblixbaseparams.lst: loginslack: <$IMinstall_dir>/identity/oblix/apps/common/bin/oblixbaseparams.xml: loginslack: where numofseconds is more than skew found in the oblogfile.
    For example, if you have following line in oblogfile "skew = 121 slack = 60", set numofseconds in the two parameter files to 130. After doing this, Stop the Identity Manager Web Server. Then stop the Identity Server. Start the Identity Server.
    Then start the Identity Manager Web Server. Start a new browser session and see if you get the same error.

  • Can anyone tell me the difference in performance between CSS URL switching

    first
    Can anyone tell me the difference in performance between CSS URL switching and F5 Big-IP?
    second
    Can anyone tell me the difference in performance between CSS URL switching and alteon ?
    third what is best overally?
    i think alteon is best
    is that right?
    best regard

    It looks like the primary question here is performance, in which case:Performance is not an issue, so long is it is sufficient. In the case of CSS 11000 and Alteon, performance fall within the same order of magnitude (supporting web sites with several billion hits per day.) F5 does not have sufficient performance, due to platform and OS limitations (I’ve heard as low as 50 connections per second in complex configurations). The Cisco CSM posts up over 10x the performance at 200k flows/second.
    Typically the primary concern is features, then CSS 11000 switches lead with a wide and flexible array of features that are not only helpful to network and web administrators, but well integrated too. CSS 11000 switches offer configuration through CLI, Web GUI, and XML. CSS 11000 collects statistics that can be exported to non-Cisco applications for billing and management.
    The CSS11000 also supports URL load balancing and HTTP header balancing within one content rule, with complex matching. Further, it supports user agent, pragma/no-cache, host field, cookie field, language field, accept, accept charset, accept-encoding, and Connection within the http header field.
    In addition, the CSS11000 matches up to 128 bytes with support of wildcards anywhere within the string.On the other hand, Nortel (Alteon) - HTTP header load balancing is not supported on the same VIP as URL load balancing. Eg. This means that a simulated WAP user cannot be directed to a server while load balancing "normal" browsers to their servers based on URL without using two separate VIPs. Only ONE http header load balance is supported on the entire switch. This limits you to either User Agent (WAP, Netscape, IE, Palm, etc), OR pragma/no cache (do not send the user to cache, allow (the user) to go to the origin), or Host field (allowing you to direct on domain name), or Cookie. Also, Nortel does not support the language field.
    In regards to F5, many of the performance claims are based on HTTP 1.0 requests (most web sites today are not using HTTP 1.0), Many emerging applications rely on HTTP 1.1 rather than HTTP 1.0. Also, the BIG-IP cannot spoof the connection to detect the URL, cannot do NAT on the flow, and cannot maintain states for persistent connections.
    Overall, I think CSS switches are the lowest cost to own, and most effective of all the load balancing platforms on the market.

  • How to calculate the % of time difference between different state

    Hi there,
    The below query returns the follwoign outptut. I need to calculate the % of time period that a specific state ( state ex: open or closed or all report )exists.
    I have to find the time difference between the 2 states . How could I do that ?
    The first row shows null for the previous state . How could get actual previous state for the first row?
      SELECT si.station_name,
                    vppstation.avi_control_state_code.STATE_SHORT_NAME,
                    ash.state_id ,
                    lag(ash.state_id) over (order by ash.STATE_EFF_DATE desc) previous_state,
                    TO_NUMBER(TO_CHAR(ash.state_eff_date, 'SSSSS')) "periods in sec",
                    TO_CHAR(ash.state_eff_date, 'dd-mon-yyyy hh24:mi:ss am') "Date"
               from vppstation.avi_state_history ash
    left outer join vppstation.avi_control_state_code
                 on ash.state_id = vppstation.avi_control_state_code.state_id
    LEFT OUTER JOIN vpproadside.stations_installed si  
                 ON ash.station_id = si.station_id               
              where ash.state_eff_date >= to_date('28/02/2010', 'dd/mm/yyyy')
                and ash.state_eff_date <= to_date('03/03/2010', 'dd/mm/yyyy') ;
           group by si.station_name
                         ash.state_id
           order by ash.state_eff_date asc ;
    STATION_NAME                   STATE_SHORT_NAME STATE_ID               PREVIOUS_STATE         periods in sec         Date                   
    IRDNCST02                      Open             1                    NULL                  85166                  01-mar-2010 23:39:26 pm
    IRDNCST02                      All Report       3                      1                      85159                  01-mar-2010 23:39:19 pm
    IRDNCMT01                      Closed           2                      3                      81376                  01-mar-2010 22:36:16 pm
    IRDNCST02                      Open             1                      2                      78723                  01-mar-2010 21:52:03 pm
    IRDNCST02                      All Report       3                      1                      76023                  01-mar-2010 21:07:03 pm
    IRDNCMT01                      Open             1                      3                      55922                  01-mar-2010 15:32:02 pm
    IRDNCMT01                      Closed           2                      1                      54931                  01-mar-2010 15:15:31 pm
    IRDNCHA01                      Closed           2                      2                      41291                  01-mar-2010 11:28:11 am
    IRDNCAS01                      Open             1                      2                      38847                  01-mar-2010 10:47:27 am
    IRDNCAS01                      All Report       3                      1                      37947                  01-mar-2010 10:32:27 am
    IRDNCST02                      Open             1                      3                      35332                  01-mar-2010 09:48:52 am
    IRDNCST02                      All Report       3                      1                      32632                  01-mar-2010 09:03:52 am
    IRDNCST02                      Open             1                      3                      31502                  01-mar-2010 08:45:02 am
    IRDNCST02                      All Report       3                      1                      28802                  01-mar-2010 08:00:02 am
    IRDNCHI01                      Open             1                      3                      25368                  01-mar-2010 07:02:48 am
    IRDNCHI02                      Open             1                      1                      23939                  01-mar-2010 06:38:59 am
    IRDNCMT01                      Open             1                      1                      20696                  01-mar-2010 05:44:56 am
    IRDNCCH02                      Open             1                      1                      13452                  01-mar-2010 03:44:12 am
    Edited by: Indhu Ram on Mar 11, 2010 1:34 PM
    Edited by: Indhu Ram on Mar 11, 2010 2:20 PM

    If you look at the table which is output of the given query , there is column called "STATE_ID" It shows the current state ie open or closed or all report.
    The column 'PREVIOUS_STATE' shows the state before the current state. .In the table in 2nd row in previous_state column there is state_id = 1 (open)which is the state before 'all report state'

  • How to measure time difference between zero crossing of a sine wave and rise time of a pulse on a same graph?

    I have a 50Hz sine wave and a pulse signal on a same graph. The phase difference between two is between 0-90 degrees.
    Now I need to calculate the time difference between (when the sine wave crosses zero volts) and (when the pulse rises). The frequency will stay approximately same for both signals.
    The application is for a three phase generator. In simple words, when the time difference between the zero-crossing of sine wave and the pulse rises increases, that means that the load on the generator has increases.
    I am a beginner user of LabView (version 9, 2009), maybe it is a very simple problem but I've been pulling my hair out for the last few days and coudln't figure anything out. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am using DAQ USB-6008 to measure these voltages and pulse from the generator and a sensor
    I have attached a jpg (a graph that i just made with excel to explain). The time 't' is what I am trying to measure
    Cheers
    Awais 
    Message Edited by awais.h on 03-30-2010 11:20 PM
    Message Edited by awais.h on 03-30-2010 11:21 PM
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi
    Thanks for the code but I'm afraid it won't work. Like you said the probability of choosing a value that is on both graphs may not happen. This is something that I would like the code to do automatically.
    But I did use the previous code posted and made some modifications to it and it seems to work perfectly. Now the next thing is to be able to get just that one value that tells you the first time difference.
    Here is what I get using that code.
    As you can see from the t Values. I only need the one that is highlighted. If there is a way to filter out the rest it would be great.
    I was thinking of a while loop and as soon as the value is higher than 3E-5 it would store the number and stop the loop, but I'm not too familiar with arrays in labview.
    Here is the the code modified.
    As you can see, it wasn't that big of a modification and it still is your code.
    I will keep trying.
    Thanks for the help
    Attachments:
    FinalShockSpeed.vi ‏55 KB

  • Lost connection detection time difference

    Having a problem understanding why a broken JDBC connection is detected under Windows much quicker than it is under Linux.
    I have an process that opens a connection to MSSQL using JDBC, a Stored Procedure is then executed and the result set
    processed, this execute step is repeated every 60 seconds or so. If any exception is thrown then resources are closed, sleep
    for 60 seconds, the connection is reopened (if fails then sleeps and repeats), once reopened the process continues. There is logging throughout
    the above steps.
    On Windows Vista 64bit Sun Java platform the process runs fine, if I deliberately break the connection (stop MSSQL service), the process
    logs a problems within 60 seconds and starts handling the error, when the MSSQL comes back then within 60 seonds the connection is remade
    and the process continues as expected.
    Under Ubuntu 10 64bit both Sun and OpenJDK the process runs fine, until the connectionis broken, as it takes about 17 minutes for the exception to be thrown
    for the broken connection (stopped MSSQL) to be detected, as opposed to under Windows taking seconds. Once detected then the process works as expected, retrying
    and reconnecting as it should.
    The libs and code used are the same the only difference between the windows and linux versions are the logging path parameter, have tried with different versions of Java
    and with different MSSQL JDBC drivers.
    What could be the reason for the time difference in the lost connection detection between Windows and Linux? Any help tips would be most welcome.
    Thanks.

    The connection is only made once and used throughout, it is only closed if there is a problem. This runs absolutely fine with logging for weeks, the execute and processing take millisecondsIt is pointless to keep the connection in that situation. Create it every time.
    Doing that might even fix your problem. But regardless you should still not keep it.
    Have jujst checked the timings and if the db connection is broken the on Linux (Ubuntu) the exception generated by step 4. takes up to 15 minutes 35 seconds to move on to step 7. on Windows though it is instant, there is a log message output prior to the execute statement this outputs then the exeception logged.You have an existing connection.
    Then you attempt a request which I am guess takes 17 minutes to timeout. (That happens because you are testing by stopping the server.)
    That is the problem.
    First verify the connection url. It might have timeout values in it.
    If not then the next most likely cause is that someone changed the OS (not java) TCP timeout values. Bad idea if they did. And the only way to fix is to change them back to something reasonable. You can code around this by using two threads. One that sets a timer and the other that runs the request. If the timer fires then attempt to cancel the request (see the jdbc api.)

  • How to find out time difference between 2 consecutive characters coming in

    Hi
    Data is coming on serial port and m taking this data in a input stream.I need to know the time difdference between consecutive characters.Any ideas?

    What do you mean? If you meassure the time between two characters, you want to calculate how accurate it is? First you would need to find out how accurate the System.currentTimeMillis is on the platform you run on. That may be easy
    long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
    long end;
    while ((end = System.currentTimeMills()) == start);
    long delta = end - start;But sometimes (on win98) it reports 50, other times 60. So its not quite accurate. But you could redo that test a couple of times and take the avg or the max.
    Then if you get a time difference of 0ms between two characters, you know it will be somewhere 0 and 60ms. If you get 60ms between two characters, you know it will be somewhere between 0 and 120 ms. It's +/- delta seconds accurate.
    Would this be a way to calculate the percentage accuracy: 100.0-100.0*delta/(time+delta)
    Still better to meassure the time over more than just 2 characters unless it is a very slow stream.

Maybe you are looking for