2851 Router question RE:Voice.

Have implementation of 2 2851 Routers connected via 10mb EPL connection interlinking two sites via 10mb Etherenet Private Line (via int g0/1), need to know if possible to insert new HWIC T-1/ISDN PRI to supply connectivity between both ends. Traditional ROLM Phone system on T-1/PRI port to 2nd site at other end of 10mbEPL to a Media GW that will convert to access for a VoIP PBX. Concern is of course that this traffic be given priority over the 10mb EPL over any data that would be input and carried and normal data connectvity is via G0/0. Have diagram as attachment is pdf. If any one has done this would it be possible to share a config.

Hello,
Thanks for your post! Since this is not a small business product, I suggest posting your question to the Networking Professoinal Connections (NetPro) Discussion Forum for input from appropriate subject matter experts. NetPro is a peer and expert forum where you can get suggestions and information from networking professionals on a variety of solutions and technologies. The NetPro forums have many threads on the 2851 and I'm sure someone over there will be able to help you.
Let me know if you have any questions,
Cisco Moderation Team

Similar Messages

2851 router vpn to 851 router lan clients cannot ping

Greets - I'm expanding my lab experience by adding a 2851 router to my mix of 18xx and 851/871 units. Some of this infrastructure is in production, some just lab work. I have established good connectivity between 18xx's and 851/871's with IPSEC VPNs (site-to-site static and dynamic), but my problem is with adding in a 2851.
Setup: 2851 with 12.4 ADVENTK9, WAN on GE0/0 as 216.189.223.bbb/26, LAN on GE0/1 as 172.20.0.1/20 (VPN module, but no additional HWIC modules)
851 with 12.4 ADVENTK9, WAN on FE4 as 216.53.254.aaa/24, LAN on FE0..3 via BVI1 as 172.21.1.1/24
The two router WAN ports are bridged via a 3rd router (a Zywall with 216.0.0.0/8 route, with the router at 216.1.1.1) affectionately called the "InterNOT", which provides a surrogate to the great web, minus actual other hosts and dns, but it doesn't matter. As both my WAN addresses are within 216.x.x.x, this works quite well. This surrogate has tested fine and is known to not be part of a problem.
The 851 has been tested against another 851 with complementary setup and a successful VPN can run between the two.
I have good LAN-WAN connections on each router. I do have a "Good" VPN connection between the two routers.
The problem: I cannot ping from a LAN host on 172.20.x.x on the 2851 to any 172.21.1.x (eg 172.21.1.1) host on the 851, and vice versa.
From a LAN host, I can ping to my InterNOT - for example a dhcp host 172.20.6.2 on the 2851 LAN can ping 216.1.1.1 fine. I can also ping the 851's WAN address at 216.53.254.aaa.
To complicate matters, if I connect to the routers via console, I CAN ping across the vpn to the destination LAN hosts, in both directions.
This seems to indicate that there is a bridging problem between the LAN interfaces to the VPN interfaces. I suspect this is a config problem on the 2851, as I have had a similar config working on my 851 to 851 site-to-site setups. I also suspect it is in the 2851's config as I'm still just starting out with this particular router.
So some stripped-down configs:
For the 2851:
no service config
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname router2851
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
no logging buffered
no logging console
enable password mypassword2
no aaa new-model
dot11 syslog
no ip cef
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 172.20.0.1 172.20.6.1
ip dhcp excluded-address 172.20.6.254 172.20.15.254
ip dhcp pool Internal_2000
   import all
   network 172.20.0.0 255.255.240.0
   domain-name myseconddomain.int
   default-router 172.20.0.1
   lease 7
no ip domain lookup
multilink bundle-name authenticated
voice-card 0
no dspfarm
crypto pki <<truncated>>
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-2995823027
<<truncated>>
   quit
username myusername privilege 15 password 0 mypassword2
archive
log config
hidekeys
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp key mysharedkey address 216.53.254.aaa
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto map SDM_CMAP_1 1 ipsec-isakmp
description Tunnel to216.53.254.aaa
set peer 216.53.254.aaa
set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
match address 100
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description $ETH-WAN$
ip address 216.189.223.bbb 255.255.255.192
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
crypto map SDM_CMAP_1
no shut
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description $FW_INSIDE$$ETH-LAN$
ip address 172.20.0.1 255.255.240.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
no ip route-cache
duplex auto
speed auto
no mop enabled
ip forward-protocol nd
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/0
ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip dns server
ip nat inside source route-map SDM_RMAP_1 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
access-list 1 remark CCP_ACL Category=2
access-list 1 permit 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255
access-list 100 remark CCP_ACL Category=4
access-list 100 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 100 permit ip 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 remark CCP_ACL Category=2
access-list 101 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 101 deny   ip 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255 any
route-map SDM_RMAP_1 permit 1
match ip address 101
control-plane
banner motd ~This is a private computer system for authorized use only. And Stuff~
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
privilege level 15
password mypassword
login local
transport input telnet ssh
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
end
And for the 851:
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname router851
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
logging buffered 52000 debugging
no logging console
enable password mypassword
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authorization exec default local
aaa session-id common
resource policy
clock timezone PCTime -5
clock summer-time PCTime date Apr 6 2003 2:00 Oct 26 2003 2:00
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip dhcp excluded-address 172.21.1.1 172.21.1.100
ip dhcp pool Internal_2101
   import all
   network 172.21.1.0 255.255.255.0
   default-router 172.21.1.1
   domain-name mydomain.int
   dns-server 172.21.1.10
   lease 4
ip cef
ip domain name mydomain.int
ip name-server 172.21.1.10
crypto pki <<truncated>>
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-3077836316
<<truncated>>
quit
username myusername privilege 15 password 0 mypassword2
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp key mysharedkey address 216.189.223.aaa
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA1 esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA2 esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
crypto map SDM_CMAP_1 1 ipsec-isakmp
description Tunnel to216.189.223.bbb
set peer 216.189.223.bbb
set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA2
match address 100
bridge irb
interface FastEthernet0
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet1
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet2
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet3
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet4
description $ETH-WAN$
ip address 216.53.254.aaa 255.255.254.0
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
ip tcp adjust-mss 1460
duplex auto
speed auto
no cdp enable
crypto map SDM_CMAP_1
no shut
interface Vlan1
description Internal Network
no ip address
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface BVI1
description Bridge to Internal Network
ip address 172.21.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 FastEthernet4
ip route 172.21.1.0 255.255.255.0 BVI1
ip http server
ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source route-map SDM_RMAP_1 interface FastEthernet4 overload
access-list 1 remark CCP_ACL Category=2
access-list 1 permit 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 100 remark CCP_ACL Category=4
access-list 100 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 100 permit ip 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255
access-list 101 remark CCP_ACL Category=2
access-list 101 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 101 deny   ip 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.20.0.0 0.0.15.255
access-list 101 remark IPSec Rule
access-list 101 deny   ip 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255 172.21.101.0 0.0.0.31
access-list 101 permit ip 172.21.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
route-map SDM_RMAP_1 permit 1
match ip address 101
control-plane
bridge 1 route ip
banner motd ~This is a private computer system for authorized use only. And Stuff.~
line con 0
password mypassword
no modem enable
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password mypassword
scheduler max-task-time 5000
end
Note that the above are somewhat stripped-down configs, without firewall or WAN ACL's - interestingly my default WAN-Inbound ACLs seem to break connectivity when included, so I realize I have some more cleanup to do there, but the 2851 LAN bridging seems to be what I should concentrate on first.
I'm still googling some of the particulars with the 2851, but any assistance is appreciated.
Regards,
Ted.

Hi,
First,please delete NAT.If we configured the NAT in the RRAS,the source IP address in all packets sent to 192.168.1.0/24 would be translated to 192.168.1.224.
Second,please enable the LAN routing in RRAS server.To enable LAN routing,please follow the steps below,
1.In the RRAS server,Open Routing and Remote Access.
2.Right-click the server name,then click
properties.
3.On the General tab,select
IPv4 Router check box,and then click Local area network(LAN) routing only.
Then,announce the 172.16.0.0 network to the router.
To learn more details about enabling LAN routing, please refer to the link below,
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd458974.aspx
Best Regards,
Tina

Dialup access on 2851 router

I am configuring a 2851 router with a NM-1CE1T1-PRI card and a PVDM2-12DM module. This router will be used for dial-up access for remote clients only. I have configured the T1 controller, group-async interface and applicable lines (see attached config). When the number is dialed I don't get any ringing, but the call appears to connect, however, I just get dead air. I have ran various debug and logging commands and I'm not seeing anything in terms of erorrs or line activity. The T1 is straight 24 channels for dial-up, no D-channel.
Also, is it correct to us the DS0-group command in the controller? When I tried the pri-group and channel-group commands they created a serial D-channel, which I'm not using. I am running 12.4.11T, modem firmware v3.07.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

To define T1 channels for compressed voice calls and the channel-associated signaling (CAS) method by which the router connects to the PBX or PSTN, enter the ds0-group controller configuration command. The no form of the command removes the group and signaling setting. This command is supported from the IOS versions 12.1 and 12.1(3)T.

Router 2911 with voice card VIC3-E/M VOIP Problem

hi All
I want to ask if any of you have any experience like this. I have deployed a new Cisco router (model 2911) in my client. The previous router they used is 2811. After deployement, the WAN & LAN connection work fine, but the VOIP connection does not work.
The previous router (2811) uses a voice card module VIC2-e/m. But the new router (2911) use voice card module VIC3-e/m. It is used to connect to the PABX Panasonic TD-1232.
Could this be a factor?
Can anyone help?

Hi,
In addition to what Terry has said, the only change is IOS 15.1 where Toll Fraud Prevention feature was introduced which says
The router will automatically add any destinations that are defined as an ipv4 target in a VoIP dial-peer to the trusted source list.You can run the command
show ip address trusted list
To overcome this behaviuor, you can follow the three ways as suggested in below link .The one has been already suggested by Terry.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/46566/understanding-toll-fraud-enhancements-1512t
your 28XX router has 12.4 IOS version
regds,
aman

Etherchannel trunking between 2970 switch & 2851 router

Hi.
I'm planning to do router on a stick with my Catalyst 2970 and my Cisco 2851 router. I got it working to do router on a stick with one physical link to do interVLAN routing, but when I try to configure it using an etherchannel trunk between them, I can't get it working. Please help. Here's my running config for the switch and router:
2970 Switch:
<removed irrelevant info>
interface Port-channel1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 10
switchport mode trunk
duplex full
interface GigabitEthernet0/23
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 10
switchport mode trunk
duplex full
channel-group 1 mode on
interface GigabitEthernet0/24
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 10
switchport mode trunk
duplex full
channel-group 1 mode on
interface Vlan1
no ip address
no ip route-cache
interface Vlan10
ip address 172.16.1.18 255.255.255.240
no ip route-cache
ip default-gateway 172.16.1.17
2851 Router:
interface Port-channel1
no ip address
duplex full
speed 1000
interface Port-channel1.10
encapsulation dot1Q 10 native
ip address 172.16.1.17 255.255.255.240
interface Port-channel1.20
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address 172.16.2.1 255.255.255.240
interface Port-channel1.30
encapsulation dot1Q 30
ip address 172.16.3.1 255.255.255.240
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no ip address
channel-group 1
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
channel-group 1
Thank you.

The following is a similar example , try some debuging to find encapsulation errors.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps628/products_configuration_example09186a00800ef797.shtml
Also see whether you are meeting the following requirements
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk213/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094646.shtml

UC500- Outbound SIP Routing Question

We have a UC540 that is receiving its trunking from a cloud based sip server. They have two trunks on the server, one for voice traffic and one for fax traffic. Inbound this works fine but all outbound traffic goes over the 'voice' trunk. Is it possible to route outbound traffic, from the fxs ports that the fax machines are connected to, onto the 'fax' trunk of the sip server? The sip server only provides one ip address, with unique registration to each trunk.

Hey guys,
Thanks for the response. Let me clarify my question a bit. I get the translation routing part and that is very helpful but I am still stuck on how to point a dial peer to the 'fax' trunk on the sip server.
A typical dial peer on the switch looks like this:
dial-peer voice 1022 voip
corlist outgoing call-national
description **CCA*Generic Locale*Long Distance**
translation-profile outgoing SIP-Trunk-Out
preference 1
destination-pattern 91[2-9]..[2-9]......
session protocol sipv2
session target sip-server
voice-class codec 1
voice-class sip dtmf-relay force rtp-nte
dtmf-relay rtp-nte
ip qos dscp cs5 media
ip qos dscp cs4 signaling
no vad
and the sip-ua looks like this:
sip-ua
credentials username 7xxxxx5 password xxxxx realm xxx.xxx.xxx.236 (voice trunk/user ID on the sip server)
credentials username 7xxxxx6 password xxxxx realm xxx.xxx.xxx.236 (fax trunk/user ID on the sip server)
keepalive target ipv4:xxx.xxx.xxx.236:5060
authentication username 7xxxxx5 password xxxxxx
no remote-party-id
retry invite 2
retry register 10
timers connect 100
timers keepalive active 100
registrar ipv4:xxx.xxx.xxx.236 expires 3600
sip-server ipv4:xxx.xxx.xxx.236:5060
connection-reuse
host-registrar
Thanks,
Chad

2851 Router will not boot from CF, after reload goes into rommon

I recently obtained a 2851 and have been battling this issue for a week now. An odd set of circumstances happen with the bootstrap startup process. If the router has loss of power or when reloaded; it fails to read the CF card and boots to rommon. I can tftp an image to it (tftpdnld -r) and IOS CAN read the flash card along with any saved configuration.
In fact once in IOS, I can wr mem and print the hardware details of the CF card. Once I reload the router it goes to rommon, fails to open the flash, then sits until i tftp the image back. When the router load IOS, it also loads the startup config.
I don't think it's a problem with the CF card as IOS can read it. I've tried formatting the card from IOS and from my pc as FAT, FAT16, FAT32, and NTFS - it didn't make a different. I updated the ROMMON to allow for USB booting but haven't purchased a USB Drive yet for testing. The upgrade didn't resolve this issue either. It almost seems like a firmware problem with the EPROM.
I've played with the config register to see what, if any, impact it had. Currently it's set to 0x2102, putting it in the diag register didn't produce any other errors than what's listed below.
I'm stumped and out of ideas. Hoping somebody has some insight on what could be causing this to happen.
Apprecite your time reading my question.
Upgrade ROMMON initialized
program load complete, entry point: 0x8000f000, size: 0xcb80
open(): Open Error = -66
loadprog: error - on file open
boot: cannot load "flash:c2800nm-advsecurityk9-
mz.151-3.T2.bin"
c2851 platform with 262144 Kbytes of main memory
Main memory is configured to 64 bit mode with ECC enabled
Upgrade ROMMON initialized
program load complete, entry point: 0x8000f000, size: 0xcb80
open(): Open Error = -66
boot: cannot open "flash:"
boot: cannot determine first executable file name on device "flash:"
c2851 platform with 262144 Kbytes of main memory
Main memory is configured to 64 bit mode with ECC enabled
Upgrade ROMMON initialized
program load complete, entry point: 0x8000f000, size: 0xcb80
open(): Open Error = -66
boot: cannot open "flash:"
boot: cannot determine first executable file name on device "flash:"
c2851 platform with 262144 Kbytes of main memory
Main memory is configured to 64 bit mode with ECC enabled
Upgrade ROMMON initialized
Entering rommon> prompt after several failed attempts to boot an IOS image.
Please check your internal/external flash drives for the correct IOS image
and issue 'reset' at the rommon> prompt to re-try the boot process.
rommon>

Yes, I have tried different types of CF and USB with the same result. I have "official" cisco 256mb cf and a sandisk cf. I have tried various brands of usbflash.
I added boot system statements to the config to cf, then usb0, then usb1 to see if perhaps one would read. It looks like it doesn't bother after the first device fails. This is only for my studies and I can deal with "tftpdnld -r" every time I boot it. Just was trying to nail down any other possibilies.
System Bootstrap, Version 12.4(13r)T11, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 2009 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Initializing memory for ECC
c2851 platform with 262144 Kbytes of main memory
Main memory is configured to 64 bit mode with ECC enabled
Upgrade ROMMON initialized
program load complete, entry point: 0x8000f000, size: 0xcb80
open(): Open Error = -66
loadprog: error - on file open
boot: cannot load "flash:c2800nm-ipvoice-mz.151-2.T1.bin"
c2851 platform with 262144 Kbytes of main memory
Main memory is configured to 64 bit mode with ECC enabled
Upgrade ROMMON initialized
program load complete, entry point: 0x8000f000, size: 0xcb80
open(): Open Error = -66
boot: cannot open "flash:"
boot: cannot determine first executable file name on device "flash:"
c2851 platform with 262144 Kbytes of main memory
Main memory is configured to 64 bit mode with ECC enabled
Upgrade ROMMON initialized
program load complete, entry point: 0x8000f000, size: 0xcb80
open(): Open Error = -66
boot: cannot open "flash:"
boot: cannot determine first executable file name on device "flash:"
c2851 platform with 262144 Kbytes of main memory
Main memory is configured to 64 bit mode with ECC enabled
Upgrade ROMMON initialized
Entering rommon> prompt after several failed attempts to boot an IOS image.
Please check your internal/external flash drives for the correct IOS image
and issue 'reset' at the rommon> prompt to re-try the boot process.
rommon 1 >

Agent Selection/Routing Question

Hello:
I wanted to run a question by the group to get some feedback on a question I have surrounding Agent routing within UCCX (8.5 su4).
Here is the setup of the environment:
CSQ1: General
Routing Criteria: LAA
CSQ2: Spanish
Routing Criteria: Most Skilled
Agent1
has Skills of General and Spanish.
Their competency is the same within both skills.
Question: Calls are in queue for both CSQ's, although the call in the spanish CSQ has been in queue longer. And agent 1 goes ready. Whats currently happening is that agent 1 is getting another call from the General Queue as opposed to getting it from the spanish queue.
How do I ensure that agent 1 gets the call from the spanish CSQ over the general CSQ? Each CSQ needs to keep the Routing Criteria the same.
My thought is that it has to be one of these two items, if not a combination of both.
Decrease the Competency of all General agents to a (5) and Making the Spanish competency higher then 5.
in the script, for Spanish Calls use the Set Priority Node to increase Spanish queued calls to be at like a 5, to ensure all spanish calls have a higher priority then general Calls.
Any feedback would be appreciated!

Hi Sean
All calls on the system if you are not using priority steps already should be answered FIFO... provided that there are agents available in the queue that the first call came in (i.e. they meet the minimum competency). Competency, skills/LAA and all those algorythms only affect who gets the call, not which one is served first. The exception to that is if the competency excludes some agents from the CSQ completely.
So a call that arrives in 'Spanish' first should be routed to agents first, as long as there are agents available. Does the same apply if the agent is 'ready' but on a call for example? E.g. call voicemail as the agent, then put a call in to spanish, then one in general, and see which one comes through first.
Priority will work, but will mean that Spanish calls alway queue jump. Priority is absolute, so a p2 call will jump in front of all other lower-priority calls regardless of how long they have been there.
If you just want first-come-first-served, then that's what you should have by default.
Aaron

BT Infinity - HG612 and second router question

Hi,
I've got an odd question. I have BT Infinity and have the HG612 VDSL modem. Does anyone know if and how it can be configured to bridge its WAN connection to another router? For work I need site-to-site VPN access, which is performed by this other router. Unfortunately it needs to own the WAN address, so I need to configure the HG612 to bridge the address with it. Has anyone does this? Is the HG612 even capable of doing this?
I can't find any user manuals on it.
Thanks,
Simon

Hi Andy and welcome
In THIS POST Phil recently wrote.-
"Very proud of myself this afternoon. I'm not much of an expert when it comes to DIY but I have managed to hardwire the router from the back of my house to the office on the first floor at the front. After much contemplation, I decided to buy some external cat5e cable and run this along the same points as the SKY feed. The result looks pretty good and I can now get 37.5Mbps upstairs as well as down. Result."
Phil is very friendly I am sure if you have any questions it might be worth dropping him a PM ( philt1808 ) PM = Private Message if you click on the link philt1808 in brackets on the right you'll see SEND THIS USER A PRIVATE MESSAGE click on that.
Mention it's PC's fault your contacting him...
Edit this thread has some info on cables http://community.bt.com/t5/BT-Infinity/Master-Socket-gt-Modem-gt-Hub-Router-cabling/td-p/408439
Please Click On any Text in Blue as that automatically links to information.
PC (NDEGR)

ESB routing question

Hi,
I have a question on the service that we are writing for the ESB. We are doing some simple transformations on the messages that the ESB consumes through AQ, then outputs to various end points(file adapter, soap adapter, DB adapter) after going through a routing service.
My question is that it seems like the message delivery to the end points is very sequential. I thought that the message was suppose to hit all the end points, regardless of it's state, and move on to the next end point, and only retry the end points that failed. But this does not seem to be the case. Is there a way to achieve this with Oracle ESB?
Thanks.

The issue is that the routing service is sequential. We have a few adapters on the same routing service, and we observe that the message moves through the adapters sequentially.
We are going to try to break out the routing service and end points so that each process dequeues from AQ, goes to one routing service, and one end point. Hopefully this way, there won't be any blocking, and all RS and endpoint can execute independently. The concern then is having a multi-consumer AQ, and I'm not sure if there are any issues with it.

1760 Router Questions

Essentially, I've been studying for the CCNA and I've decided to purchase some older equipment to set up in my house so I can get some additional practice with the IOS interface. I've been looking at 1760 routers on ebay, and it seems like a pretty good place to start as I would like to actually use the devices in my current LAN, rather than simply setting up a lab.
My question is, could I take a 1760 and connect it to my cable modem, and then connect a switch (say a 2950 that I'll purchase a later date) to another interface? What add-in cards will I need to make this possible?
Here's a graphic representation of what I'd like to do.
If the 1760 isn't a good choice for this sort of setup, what would you reccomend? I'd prefer 100Mbit/sec capable routers if possible.
Thanks for the help/suggestions.

Taylor,
if you have a VLAN capable switch and proper IOS support, you can configure PPPoE client on a subinterface hence you can use the 1760 (or any other router) to connect to the ISP and route between VLANs.
This is my current setup:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.4
encapsulation dot1Q 4
ip pim dense-mode
ip igmp query-interval 125
pppoe enable group global
pppoe-client dial-pool-number 9
interface Dialer9
mtu 1490
bandwidth 4672
bandwidth receive 480
ip address negotiated
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
encapsulation ppp
ip policy route-map RM-loop1
dialer pool 9
crypto map CM-1
crypto ipsec client ezvpn witopia_IAD
As you can see I use a subinterface to do PPPoE client and have the Dialer 9 interface receive the public IP address then I route traffic to other dubinterfaces. I used to do that on a 1751 nd on a 1721 this is now a 1921.
You need to ensure the pppoe client on 803.1q subinterfaces is supported in the ios version you run and obviously that 803.1q subinterfaces are supported.
You can do all of that in the cisco feature nav.
Enjoy
Fabio

2 more router questions

Hi everyone. I had a couple questions about some readings on my FIOS Actiontec router. Sorry if this is basic stuff, but I am still learning:
                    1) On the my main page where it shows my computer's wireless connection it reads that remote access is enabled. What does this mean?
                    2) On the Wireless Status page it shows something called WMM is enabled. What is WMM?
Thanks in advance for any help.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Well here is an update: I made a lot of changes on my computer based on the advice given to me on this forum. Based on what I changed, I would say it was a combination of remote microsoft and remote verizon processes/services running on my computer. Now that I have disabled or blocked many of those processes and services, the router no longer displays "remote access enabled". Thanks to everyone who responded for your very helpful advice and information.

Stacked SF500-24P and routing question

I'm looking for a stackable L3 switch which can do routing and with PoE and I think the SF500-24P is just right for me but have a question.
Is a stack of 2 of these switches seen as 1 device with 1 outside ip address per VLAN by devices that have this stack as the default gateway? or is something like VRRP active between the 2 stack switches and they both have their own ip address?
Thanks in advance,
Jasper

That is correct. The entire stack seen as one device. once the switches are stacked, there is no need for VRRP, HSRP, etc.. It is all one switch with one IP for management.
HTH

Question about voice and data plan for Europe

I am in New York and my boss is going to France for a week and a half. He told me he will not have access to the internet there. He asked me to find out if it would be possible to get a voice and data plan for the month that he will be there, and if so, could someone show me where I could look at the different plans available?
If it's not possible to do that for just a month, then could someone tell me where I could find the rates are for voice and data in France?
Thanks

Hi kevindrosario,
I appreciate your interest in our International Services. France, is a GSM country and will only support a Global capable device. Unfortunately, its not clear if your boss has a Global capable device. If so, here are the details for the voice and data rates for France.
If your boss doesn't not have a Global capable device, no worries! We offer an Occasional Global Traveler program, in which we will loan you a Global device for up to 21 days. I hope this information is helpful. Please let me know if you have any any additional questions or concerns.
Thank you,

Simple Router Question (except not simple for me)

(Couldn't find another place for this question so I put it here.)
I have a router between my broadband modem and my Macs on the blink. I want to get a new one. I'm not asking for product recommendations as much as terminology clarification.
Again, I need a box that accepts my ethernet cable coming out of my broadband modem. I don't need wireless. It's simply going to allow me to offer ethernet cables out to Airport Express, iMac, etcetera.
What am I precisely looking for?
An ethernet router? Splitter? Does it need to have some sort of high bandwidth? The thing is I see these produces vaguely named and prices all over the place. A simple ethernet 'hub' strikes me as something very cheap ($20-30).
Any help truly appreciated.

Unless your broadband modem is "Also" a router, you need a router.
The Airport Express is a router, but it takes the ethernet cable and provides routing services for WiFi devices. It will not provide additional ethernet services for other devices.
You can NOT use an ethernet switch nor an ethernet hub.
While you can get ethernet only routers, the chances are that you will pay a premium over just getting a WiFi base station.
A WiFi base station is mostly a commodity items so they are often very inexpensive.
If you really do not need the WiFi services, many WiFi base stations allow you to turn off the WiFi.
Also note. If you are going to use the Airport Express to provide your WiFi, then you should configure it so it is in "Bridge" mode, otherwise you will have multiple isolated subnets where the devices on WiFi will not be able to properly see the devices on your ethernet. Putting the Airport Express in "Bridge" mode makes the WiFi network part of the same subnet that the ethernet devcies are on.

2851 Router question RE:Voice.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for