5508 snmp packet loss

We had a system outage due to power problems a few days ago, and now our WLC is showing short term packet loss when monitoring it using SNMP. We also monitor it using ICMP, but that shows no packet loss. I looked at the interface statistics on the WLC and all of the switches in between and there are no errors to be seen. is there any way to troubleshoot this problem on the WLC? I am more familiar with IOS than the WLC CLI.
Thanks,
Dan.

No, no wireless issues that we know of. I wouldn't rule it out so fast, as our monitoring system is working fine. All of the other devices it is monitoring have no packet loss. Yes it could be something with the network, but why is it only this one device doing this....
Other then enabling and disabling the snmp option, and checking the interface the only other thing I know of trying is restarting it.
Dan.

Similar Messages

Packet Loss after Reboot of ASA 5510

Hi all,
I have an ASA and a 2811 behind it and I had to replace a battery on a UPS so I had to take down the network to do it. Before doing it the network ran fine, but I did a WR MEM and a Copy RUNNING to STARTUP config thinking that the configs I had were fine. At some point in the past I must of made a change and never applied it and maybe it is causing the issue, but I am at a loss as to what is the cause. I am getting consistent packet loss from the ASA out. Any address I ping on the inside is clear and quick. Also, I do not know if it is related, but I cannot get results from TRACE ROUTES and I believe I used to.
I have confirmed the PL is related to my network, if I plug the static IP info from the provider in to a laptop, it is clear. I am at my wits end, and I know just enough to be dangerous, so any help would be appreciated.
Here are my configs:
ASA5510# sh run
: Saved
ASA Version 9.1(4)
hostname ASA5510
domain-name m.int
enable password encrypted
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any4
xlate per-session deny tcp any4 any6
xlate per-session deny tcp any6 any4
xlate per-session deny tcp any6 any6
xlate per-session deny udp any4 any4 eq domain
xlate per-session deny udp any4 any6 eq domain
xlate per-session deny udp any6 any4 eq domain
xlate per-session deny udp any6 any6 eq domain
passwd encrypted
names
dns-guard
interface Ethernet0/0
description LAN Interface
nameif Inside
security-level 100
ip address 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.252
interface Ethernet0/1
description WAN Interface
nameif Outside
security-level 0
ip address 68.233.x.x 255.255.255.128
interface Ethernet0/2
description DMZ
nameif DMZ
security-level 100
ip address 10.10.0.1 255.255.255.252
interface Ethernet0/3
description VOIP
nameif VOIP
security-level 100
ip address 10.10.2.1 255.255.255.252
interface Management0/0
management-only
shutdown
nameif management
security-level 0
no ip address
boot system disk0:/asa914-k8.bin
ftp mode passive
dns domain-lookup Inside
dns domain-lookup Outside
dns server-group DefaultDNS
name-server 8.8.8.8
name-server 8.8.4.4
name-server 68.233.xx.5
name-server 68.233.xx.6
domain-name m.int
same-security-traffic permit inter-interface
object network ROUTER-2811
host 10.10.1.2
object network ROUTER-2821
host 10.10.0.2
object network WEBCAM-01
host 192.168.1.5
object network DNS-SERVER
host 192.168.1.2
object network ROUTER-3745
host 10.10.2.2
object network RDP-DC1
host 192.168.1.2
object network BLUE
host 192.168.1.6
description Blue Iris Server
object network M_LAP_LEA
host 192.168.1.20
description Laptop from LEA
object-group network PAT-SOURCE
network-object 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.252
network-object 10.10.0.0 255.255.255.252
network-object 10.10.2.0 255.255.255.252
network-object 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 172.16.20.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 128.162.1.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 128.162.10.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 128.162.20.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 162.128.1.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 162.128.10.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 162.128.20.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 142.16.1.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 142.16.10.0 255.255.255.0
network-object 142.16.20.0 255.255.255.0
object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_2
network-object host 98.22.xxx
object-group network Outside_access_in
object-group protocol DM_INLINE_PROTOCOL_1
protocol-object gre
access-list USERS standard permit 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0
access-list Outside_access_in extended permit tcp host 98.22.xxx object ROUTER-2811 eq ssh
access-list Outside_access_in extended permit tcp host 98.22.xxx object ROUTER-2821 eq ssh
access-list Outside_access_in extended permit tcp host 98.22.xxx interface Outside eq https
access-list Outside_access_in extended permit tcp host 98.22.xxx object WEBCAM-01 eq www inactive
access-list Outside_access_in extended permit tcp host 98.22.xxx object RDP-DC1 eq xxxx
access-list Outside_access_in extended permit tcp host 98.22.xxx object BLUE eq xxxx
access-list Outside_access_in extended permit tcp host 98.22.xxx object ROUTER-3745 eq ssh
access-list Outside_access_in extended permit tcp any object BLUE eq xxxx
access-list dmz-access-vlan1 extended permit ip 128.162.1.0 255.255.255.0 any
access-list dmz-access remark Permit all traffic to DC1
access-list dmz-access extended permit ip 128.162.1.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.1.2
access-list dmz-access remark Permit only DNS traffic to DNS server
access-list dmz-access extended permit udp 128.162.1.0 255.255.255.0 host 192.168.1.2 eq domain
access-list dmz-access remark Permit ICMP to all devices in DC
access-list dmz-access extended permit icmp 128.162.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
access-list dmz-access remark Permit all traffic to DC1
access-list dmz-access remark Permit only DNS traffic to DNS server
access-list dmz-access remark Permit ICMP to all devices in DC
pager lines 24
logging enable
logging asdm informational
mtu Inside 1500
mtu Outside 1500
mtu DMZ 1500
mtu VOIP 1500
mtu management 1500
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
icmp deny any Outside
asdm image disk0:/asdm-715.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
no arp permit-nonconnected
object network ROUTER-2811
nat (Inside,Outside) static interface service tcp ssh x
object network ROUTER-2821
nat (DMZ,Outside) static interface service tcp ssh x
object network WEBCAM-01
nat (Inside,Outside) static interface service tcp www x
object network ROUTER-3745
nat (VOIP,Outside) static interface service tcp ssh x
object network RDP-DC1
nat (Inside,Outside) static interface service tcp xxxx xxxx
object network BLUE
nat (Inside,Outside) static interface service tcp xxxx xxxx
nat (any,Outside) after-auto source dynamic any interface
access-group Outside_access_in in interface Outside
route Outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 68.233.151.1 1
route DMZ 128.162.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.2 1
route DMZ 128.162.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.2 1
route DMZ 128.162.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.0.2 1
route VOIP 142.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.2.2 1
route VOIP 142.16.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.2.2 1
route VOIP 142.16.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.2.2 1
route Inside 172.16.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.2 1
route Inside 172.16.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.2 1
route Inside 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.2 1
route Inside 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.2 1
route Inside 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.2 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout pat-xlate 0:00:30
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
timeout floating-conn 0:00:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
aaa-server PNL-RADIUS protocol radius
aaa-server PNL-RADIUS (Inside) host 192.168.1.2
key *****
radius-common-pw *****
user-identity default-domain LOCAL
aaa authentication ssh console LOCAL
http server enable
http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Inside
http 98.22.xxx 255.255.255.255 Outside
snmp-server host Inside 192.168.1.2 community ***** version 2c udp-port 161
snmp-server location Lovington NM USA
snmp-server contact Mitchell Tuckness
snmp-server community *****
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart warmstart
crypto ipsec security-association pmtu-aging infinite
crypto ca trustpool policy
telnet timeout 5
ssh 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Inside
ssh 98.22.xxx 255.255.255.255 Outside
ssh timeout 60
ssh version 2
ssh key-exchange group dh-group1-sha1
console timeout 0
threat-detection basic-threat
threat-detection statistics
threat-detection statistics tcp-intercept rate-interval 30 burst-rate 400 average-rate 200
ntp server 24.56.178.140 source Outside prefer
username xxxx password x encrypted privilege 15
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
policy-map type inspect dns migrated_dns_map_1
parameters
message-length maximum client auto
message-length maximum 512
policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect dns migrated_dns_map_1
inspect ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect h323 ras
inspect rsh
inspect rtsp
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect skinny
inspect sunrpc
inspect xdmcp
inspect sip
inspect netbios
inspect tftp
inspect ip-options
inspect icmp
inspect icmp error
inspect pptp
class class-default
user-statistics accounting
service-policy global_policy global
prompt hostname context
no call-home reporting anonymous
call-home
profile CiscoTAC-1
no active
destination address http https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/oddce/services/DDCEService
destination address email [email protected]
destination transport-method http
subscribe-to-alert-group diagnostic
subscribe-to-alert-group environment
subscribe-to-alert-group inventory periodic monthly
subscribe-to-alert-group configuration periodic monthly
subscribe-to-alert-group telemetry periodic daily
password encryption aes
hpm topN enable
Cryptochecksum:949189d67866f6c09450769d41649992
: end
C2811#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 3925 bytes
version 15.1
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
hostname C2811
boot-start-marker
boot system flash
boot-end-marker
enable secret 4 DWJfYBf6KhkIRmhhIhx8ibAAXVGQWjwfuyzfaX4Im8M
aaa new-model
aaa session-id common
dot11 syslog
no ip source-route
ip cef
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip domain name maladomini.int
ip name-server 192.168.1.2
ip name-server 8.8.8.8
ip name-server 68.233.xxx.x
ip name-server 68.233.xxx.x
no vlan accounting input
multilink bundle-name authenticated
password encryption aes
crypto pki token default removal timeout 0
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-1290569776
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-1290569776
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-1290569776
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-1290569776
certificate self-signed 01
3082022B 30820194 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 05050030
31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274
69666963 6174652D 31323930 35363937 3736301E 170D3134 30313035 30363130
33395A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649
4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D31 32393035
36393737 3630819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281
8100B18F F63C5121 00785DE0 854601BA EE77DAA3 21286D8C 6E700C37 237CC1BE
611023AF FBE04BBE 7B4B3233 E4E129DD A74604E5 62AA39BF 77F98D5D D63944E9
2345AE37 D93C5753 E425E85A EB22C2C9 CFC5D1A0 F800449B 0419A5C8 A0A101EC
02928172 7B30A609 71ADA3D4 68F4F484 AF2B3249 0E225DB2 C72C136A E670D761
DDE30203 010001A3 53305130 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 301F0603
551D2304 18301680 1461F6DE 8EF50F7B 0E46359F 421EA106 9375F65F 30301D06
03551D0E 04160414 61F6DE8E F50F7B0E 46359F42 1EA10693 75F65F30 300D0609
2A864886 F70D0101 05050003 81810049 BA55F695 8525265F ED2D77EE 8706BF10
63A7E644 202F6663 9EA5551F 47F7FC50 D4021EDD E3DC5A80 39FD161A C337D20D
71B98875 0F1FE887 649E81D3 F93F7A1B A1E18B99 A77B1A59 84DB4711 867913FD
044084FB 651ECA6E C6EDF35C E43A2946 8C01781E 26DB9484 C8740A82 4A7CA266
A0655526 CBCB4982 F30D68E9 D70753
quit
license udi pid CISCO2811 sn FTX1041A07T
username admin secret 5 $1$iBeC$8dqYMcpTex8gtUfannzox.
username xxxx privilege 15 secret 4 DWJfYBf6KhkIRmhhIhx8ibAAXVGQWjwfuyzfaX4Im8M
redundancy
ip ssh time-out 60
ip ssh authentication-retries 5
ip ssh version 2
interface FastEthernet0/0
description CONNECTION TO INSIDE INT. OF ASA
ip address 10.10.1.2 255.255.255.252
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface FastEthernet0/1
no ip address
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface FastEthernet0/1.1
description VLAN 10
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 192.168.1.2
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface FastEthernet0/1.2
description VLAN 20
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address 192.168.20.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 192.168.1.2
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface FastEthernet0/1.3
description Trunk Interface VLAN 1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 192.168.1.2
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface Dialer0
no ip address
ip default-gateway 10.10.1.1
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip dns server
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.1.1
ip ospf name-lookup
access-list 1 permit any
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
snmp-server community Maladomini-RW RW
tftp-server system:running-config 1
control-plane
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
password 7 101D58415D361606050A147A
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
exec-timeout 0 0
password 7 0527031B2C49470758
transport input ssh
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
end
2821:
C2821#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 4128 bytes
version 15.1
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
hostname C2821
boot-start-marker
boot system flash
boot-end-marker
enable secret 4 x
aaa new-model
aaa session-id common
dot11 syslog
no ip source-route
ip cef
no ip dhcp use vrf connected
ip domain name maladomini.int
ip name-server 192.168.1.2
ip name-server 8.8.8.8
ip name-server 68.233.xxx.x
ip name-server 68.233.xxx.x
no vlan accounting input
multilink bundle-name authenticated
password encryption aes
crypto pki token default removal timeout 0
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-3335929422
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-3335929422
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-3335929422
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-3335929422
certificate self-signed 01
3082022B 30820194 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 05050030
31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274
69666963 6174652D 33333335 39323934 3232301E 170D3134 30313135 30333537
32385A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649
4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D33 33333539
32393432 3230819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281
8100AF6D 8C23745E 80AA83AC BE0243DD C8F8EC56 85BBE495 EF790354 B7E81921
4C46CE35 F840420A 8385D3E3 B7B14EDF F4A8DB51 1A29E0ED A2704F69 9632ED7E
5F66E546 486B2821 FB77266F 950D351E 13AA18FE 687643F6 FB9BF95F E56A0195
19B8A7B6 7A582357 2517F08E 5E3BA197 2CD71E3E 32AB4B96 412E9AE3 1932A218
7A1F0203 010001A3 53305130 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 301F0603
551D2304 18301680 14A86115 C2CA9E15 399B2A9C 21585323 1E2F3D98 45301D06
03551D0E 04160414 A86115C2 CA9E1539 9B2A9C21 5853231E 2F3D9845 300D0609
2A864886 F70D0101 05050003 81810028 81D8F701 D6AFDC54 94A93185 1E5F4DAC
4DBF50B7 30B57ABD D1612E69 D964B77A A379F55C 7E823F42 4D01440C B237DED9
6B8047B7 0496D8BB BD7EAC18 E6ACA1B1 3B527172 4A7B0D7B 4A031168 F99B171D
D217CB06 2F31E4DF FD9AC1C9 1199869A 34E90671 5611A6DA 7CC6A7B0 A39F78FB
B3932E37 4B302779 E761DB00 AFA7CC
quit
license udi pid CISCO2821 sn FTX1327AH7A
username x privilege 15 secret 4 x
redundancy
ip ssh time-out 60
ip ssh authentication-retries 5
ip ssh version 2
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description CONNECTION TO INSIDE INT. OF ASA
ip address 10.10.0.2 255.255.255.252
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.1
description VLAN 10
encapsulation dot1Q 10
ip address 128.162.10.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 192.168.1.2
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.2
description VLAN 20
encapsulation dot1Q 20
ip address 128.162.20.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 192.168.1.2
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface GigabitEthernet0/1.3
description Trunk Interface VLAN1
encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
ip address 128.162.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 192.168.1.2
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface Serial0/0/0
no ip address
shutdown
interface Serial0/1/0
no ip address
shutdown
interface Serial0/2/0
no ip address
shutdown
interface Dialer0
no ip address
ip default-gateway 10.10.0.1
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip dns server
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.0.1
ip ospf name-lookup
access-list 1 permit any
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
snmp-server community Maladomini-RW RW
snmp-server host 192.168.1.2 version 2c Maladomini-RW envmon cpu snmp
control-plane
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
password 7 101D58415D361606050A147A
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
exec-timeout 0 0
password 7 15415A545C0B2F29213D0B73
transport input ssh
scheduler allocate 20000 1000
end
POE Switch:
C3560#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 7368 bytes
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
service password-encryption
hostname C3560
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
enable secret 5 $1$wzS5$Kl0aHmGjOrfNL8H8QN9gJ1
enable password 7 091F1F514124131F02023A7B
username mtuckness privilege 15 secret 5 $1$j68Z$ObA6K7Qc2Vsmyu479Hlh6/
aaa new-model
aaa session-id common
clock timezone MST -7
system mtu routing 1500
ip domain-name maladomini.int
password encryption aes
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-2488747392
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-2488747392
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-2488747392
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-2488747392
certificate self-signed 01
3082024C 308201B5 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030
31312F30 2D060355 04031326 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274
69666963 6174652D 32343838 37343733 3932301E 170D3933 30333031 30303031
30385A17 0D323030 31303130 30303030 305A3031 312F302D 06035504 03132649
4F532D53 656C662D 5369676E 65642D43 65727469 66696361 74652D32 34383837
34373339 3230819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281
8100B715 1CCA0EFB 6D550F27 A4B9F403 7D1CBCCE AB363F89 61AF4773 64351010
AB866AA6 411463BC A7D9C6E3 0CA4EEEC 47C50D33 2F904AD1 8FC5B10B 8F204157
FB5B3A4C 78BD4BDF 14F79CCC D9A0E10B 909BF5BA 095BB9AC 722197D4 3C2CB70B
15D2A221 5FF8BC03 6A642B36 437B9E22 858BF597 F1844026 5DAF2114 EF75718D
EC3B0203 010001A3 74307230 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 301F0603
551D1104 18301682 14433335 36302E6D 616C6164 6F6D696E 692E696E 74301F06
03551D23 04183016 8014D364 9162E0D2 C7936513 1E1C677C 73D675EC 37FF301D
0603551D 0E041604 14D36491 62E0D2C7 9365131E 1C677C73 D675EC37 FF300D06
092A8648 86F70D01 01040500 03818100 2DE49969 2E9C7A81 E96B97A8 7E15BC69
2DA62233 C958092D 2E51DD59 526DA795 CBFE219E 3536852A 5F71A90A BF5016E0
F93FA6F7 55D9BA23 52A2858E B927E0FB B3DC6B20 28FBD64C 6FA956EC 3E6E8756
F12F7182 538D13AE E343674E 41A1BDE1 A42579F2 8070FC92 5C805995 7BA25FA5
3A89C4E5 C6B2D76F FF2C1CF9 6A8DF631
quit
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree portfast bpduguard default
no spanning-tree optimize bpdu transmission
spanning-tree extend system-id
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
ip ssh time-out 60
ip ssh authentication-retries 5
ip ssh version 2
interface FastEthernet0/1
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
interface FastEthernet0/2
switchport mode access
spanning-tree portfast
Removed interfaces
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description CONNECTION TO 2821 ROUTER - TRUNK
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,10,20
switchport mode trunk
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
interface GigabitEthernet0/4
interface Vlan1
ip address 128.162.1.3 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 192.168.1.2
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
interface Vlan10
ip address 128.162.10.3 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 192.168.1.2
interface Vlan20
ip address 128.192.20.3 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 192.168.1.2
ip default-gateway 10.10.0.2
no ip classless
ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
access-list 1 permit any
snmp-server community Maladomini-RW RO
snmp-server location Lovington NM USA
line con 0
exec-timeout 0 0
password 7 075C701416281D081E1C355D
line vty 0 4
password 7 0527031B2C49470758
transport input ssh
line vty 5 15
exec-timeout 0 0
password 7 05585757796D4A04100B2943
end

I located the issue of the packet loss. I have a security system that uploads FTP images of the cameras and after the reboot of the network, the only computer that wasn't shut down was the security camera PC.
So I think what happened was after I brought everything back up, it was saturating the outgoing bandwidth, causing packet loss and high latency. Once I determined what it was and shut off the FTP image upload, the pings stabilized and it is working fine now. Trace routes are still not functioning, but I can live without that for now.

Percantage of packet loss on link

I am working with Cisco routers and i need somehow to find out packet loss percentage for each link (actual). I was trying to use ICMP Jitter IP SLA operation, which unfortunately returns only the number of dropped packets. So i need to get via SNMP the number of transferred packets on line to calculate the percentage. Which OID should i use to obtain this information?

Be careful, by definition a 10 Mbit half-duplex connection is equivalent to a single T1 of bandwidth, nothing even close to 6 Mbit of bandwidth. If you are running QoS (assuming CBWFQ and LLQ), based on a shaped parent policy equal to 6 Mbit you will definitely oversubscribe the 10 Mbit half-duplex connections by a significant margin.
The reason for this is that a T1 is 1.536 Mbit full-duplex (over 3 Mbit of bandwidth). A 10 Mbit half-duplex connection maxes out of usable bandwidth at about 30% utilization, with almost 100% packet loss (due to excessive collisions) at 40% utilization. As you can see, 40% utilization on a half-duplex 10 Mbit connection is equal to about 4 Mbit of bandwidth and a single T1 is over 3 Mbit of bandwidth. Again, not anywhere close to 6 Mbit of bandwidth.
Assuming you are shaping at 6 Mbit with a child CBWFQ and LLQ policy (you are shaping, right?), you will not be able to guarantee that rate of bandwidth which will crush your audio/video call.
Let me know if you have any questions/comments...

Traceroute timeouts and lots of packet loss when a...

I host various site via the above, and since late last night and today, I am having connection timeout issues on all of them (but sites like bbc, bt etc are fine). I contacted them and performed a traceroute to my default site southee.co.uk which timed out. Below are the results:
traceroute to southee.co.uk (37.61.236.12), 64 hops max, 52 byte packets
1 bthomehub (192.168.1.254) 2.733 ms 2.414 ms 2.415 ms
2 esr5.manchester5.broadband.bt.net (217.47.67.144) 72.412 ms 29.705 ms 131.735 ms
3 217.47.67.13 (217.47.67.13) 31.390 ms 29.680 ms 103.936 ms
4 213.1.69.226 (213.1.69.226) 41.172 ms 32.700 ms 129.323 ms
5 31.55.165.103 (31.55.165.103) 30.791 ms 31.639 ms 130.306 ms
6 213.120.162.69 (213.120.162.69) 31.248 ms 59.138 ms 30.657 ms
7 31.55.165.109 (31.55.165.109) 32.159 ms 31.507 ms 31.513 ms
8 acc2-10gige-9-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net (109.159.250.228) 31.499 ms 31.325 ms
acc2-10gige-0-2-0.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net (109.159.250.194) 31.197 ms
9 core2-te0-12-0-1.ealing.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.250.147) 41.744 ms
core2-te0-13-0-0.ealing.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.250.139) 41.346 ms
core2-te0-5-0-1.ealing.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.250.145) 41.744 ms
10 peer1-xe3-3-1.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.254.211) 39.527 ms
peer1-xe10-0-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net (109.159.254.122) 38.791 ms 38.910 ms
11 te2-3.sov-edge1.uk.timico.net (195.66.224.111) 54.032 ms 37.941 ms 38.642 ms
12 78-25-201-30.static.dsl.as8607.net (78.25.201.30) 45.830 ms 46.413 ms 42.448 ms
13 * * *
They then performed a traceroute from the server and got the following, again with timeouts and packet loss. See below:
1. 37.61.236.1 0.0% 10 0.5 0.7 0.4 2.9 0.8
2. ae0-2061.ndc-core1.uk.timico 0.0% 10 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.1
3. te2-3.sov-edge1.uk.timico.ne 0.0% 10 10.5 9.7 4.2 30.2 8.7
4. linx1.ukcore.bt.net 0.0% 10 4.1 4.3 4.1 5.9 0.6
5. host213-121-193-153.ukcore.b 0.0% 10 5.5 8.0 4.9 12.7 2.3
6. acc2-10GigE-4-3-1.mr.21cn-ip 0.0% 10 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.6 0.1
7. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8. 31.55.165.108 0.0% 10 12.1 12.1 11.8 12.4 0.2
9. 213.120.162.68 0.0% 10 12.0 12.1 12.0 12.3 0.1
10. ??? 100.0 10 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
I've just spent a fustrating 15 minutes with Bt Support chat who just seemed want to pass me on to the BT Business team, so I thought I'd post here, for a more informed response.

Hi Jane, Thanks for the reply. I have now purchased an AEBS(n) to try to overcome this problem. The Apple site says it is compatible with all versions of Airport card so I thought it would solve the problem. My new problem is to be found here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1087292&tstart=0
However to answer your questions, The OS is 10.4.10 and I have run every updater I can find for all Macs concerned. hope this helps.

Terrible Packet Loss in Game- Please help!

Computing statistics for 100 seconds...
Source to Here This Node/Link
Hop RTT Lost/Sent = Pct Lost/Sent = Pct Address
0 Sam-PC.home [192.168.1.5]
0/ 25 = 0% |
1 2ms 0/ 25 = 0% 0/ 25 = 0% Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
1/ 25 = 4% |
2 13ms 1/ 25 = 4% 0/ 25 = 0% L100.WASHDC-VFTTP-126.verizon-gni.net [173.66.228.1]
0/ 25 = 0% |
3 11ms 1/ 25 = 4% 0/ 25 = 0% G1-5-0-4.WASHDC-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.213.68]
0/ 25 = 0% |
4 20ms 1/ 25 = 4% 0/ 25 = 0% so-12-1-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.151.230]
0/ 25 = 0% |
5 12ms 1/ 25 = 4% 0/ 25 = 0% 0.xe-8-0-0.BR2.IAD8.ALTER.NET [152.63.38.129]
0/ 25 = 0% |
6 34ms 1/ 25 = 4% 0/ 25 = 0% ae17.edge1.washingtondc12.level3.net [4.68.62.137]
0/ 25 = 0% |
7 33ms 2/ 25 = 8% 1/ 25 = 4% vl-3503-ve-117.ebr1.Washington12.Level3.net [4.69.158.26]
0/ 25 = 0% |
8 29ms 3/ 25 = 12% 2/ 25 = 8% ae-6-6.ebr1.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.69.148.105]
0/ 25 = 0% |
9 30ms 2/ 25 = 8% 1/ 25 = 4% ae-63-63.ebr3.Atlanta2.Level3.net [4.69.148.241]
0/ 25 = 0% |
10 50ms 1/ 25 = 4% 0/ 25 = 0% ae-7-7.ebr3.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.134.21]
1/ 25 = 4% |
11 56ms 2/ 25 = 8% 0/ 25 = 0% ae-63-63.csw1.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.151.133]
0/ 25 = 0% |
12 54ms 2/ 25 = 8% 0/ 25 = 0% ae-1-60.edge2.Dallas1.Level3.net [4.69.145.11]
0/ 25 = 0% |
13 54ms 2/ 25 = 8% 0/ 25 = 0% 4.59.197.34
1/ 25 = 4% |
14 50ms 3/ 25 = 12% 0/ 25 = 0% 64.25.32.9
0/ 25 = 0% |
15 --- 25/ 25 =100% 22/ 25 = 88% 64.25.32.26
0/ 25 = 0% |
16 48ms 3/ 25 = 12% 0/ 25 = 0% 64.25.39.1
These are the results of a test I ran, but I don't know how to solve the problem. The game is unplayable because of the amount of packet loss. I know it is an issue of connection between the game and my router, so should I get a new router if mine is old?

The router I would imagine to be okay for the first bit, but for the sake of things, reboot the router and also try giving your ONT a reboot by unplugging it from AC power and then disconnecting the battery. Re-connect it after 30 seconds by connecting the battery and then plugging it back into AC power.
Also, see if the packet loss takes place during specific times of the day. If your router has a WAN connection over Coax (rather than an Ethernet connection) to your ONT, also consider checking your MoCa speeds based on this FAQ. Poor MoCa speeds can suggest shoddy coaxial causing some issues, too: https://secure.dslreports.com/faq/verizonfios/3.2_MOCA#16569
========
The first to bring me 1Gbps Fiber for $30/m wins!

WIFI Packet Loss/Jitter MacBook Air 11 & LION OSX 10.7.1

I started using computers more than 30 years ago when I was 5, I had my first IBM PC at the age of 10 and have never had any interest in paying over the odds for an Apple mac mainly because I saw the Mac as a kind of "Can't open nothing", one mouse buttoned retard of the computer world.
That is, until now.
I set up an online business 3 years ago and rented a dedicated server and set the whole business up in a cloud, so to speak. Having done that, all I needed a laptop for was a remote desktop connection and to run a SIP phone (Internet phone).
My PC based laptops had almost nothing installed on them, and I wasn't using software on the laptop itself, I was using remote desktop, so - why not try a MAC? The new Macbook Air 11 is small, light and made of metal and glass so should be robust enough to travel with me.
I have to say, this was the worst move I've ever made.
I opened the new shiny macbook and the first thing I noticed was that the internet seemed hit and miss. Moving around the room I managed to find a spot whereby pages woud load quickly. Strange, my £200 acer laptop was sh.t fast everywhere in the house. No matter, I packed it back away and carried on working on the Windows machine.
I've come to Newquay this week, and i've started to try and use the Macbook again in a hotel. The wireless signal in the room is low, and speedtest shows about 1 meg down and 3/4 meg up. That may sound bad to you, but remote desktop uses about 5k/sec (modem dial up speed) and the softphone, well, my Asterisk VOIP setup is confugured to use the GSM codec so that's 8k/sec each way + overheads.
This whole setup was deliberately designed to be "thin" so I can travel with ease and work on bad connections like USB internet sticks.
Anyhow, the Macbook was unable to hold a stable connection to the remote desktop or SIP phone, even though the speed test showed a whopping 1 meg up and down. What you may not be aware of is that there is more to a connection than the speed, there is the quality as well. How many packets are lost / how much "jitter" is on the line.
Anyhow, we're not living in the 3rd world, I ran a PINGTEST and it showed a small amount of jitter but told me the line was class B, online games may suffer but voip should be fine.
I unpacked the Acer, placed it in exactly the same spot as the Apple had sat in and it worked beautifully with 1 bar of wireless signal, all day long. Phone calls were clear.
So you know now what I'm thinking. I'm sitting here with my £200 acer because I can't use the £1500 macbook air 11. I paid nearly sixteen hundred pounds for this piece of .... and it doesn't ...... work. Time to contact Apple support.
2nd Mistake!
Representitive 1: - Told me that I can't compare the Macbook Air to the Acer, the Acer has Google Chrome and everybody knows Google Chrome is the fastest browser. I was told there was nothing more he could do, its probably a bad line at the hotel. When I explained the Acer works fine for voip I was told well, maybe it is getting a better signal. I explained the Acer has the cheapest possible parts inside it and paid 1500 for this macbook, expecting it to have quality parts inside and was told I'd paid for the size, because its so small but its not considered "powerful". Apple do you train your staff? Clearly not.
Thank god I wasn't paying to talk to this moron.
Representitive 2: - Had no idea what packet loss or Jitter was, got me to do a speedtest and said that looks fine. Then he got me to remove the WIFI adapter and re add it in the network settings.
Guess what, nothing changed, its still the same hardware and software.
Representitive 3: - Still not really understanding "quality" issues with the networking interface, I was asked to install the latest Java client. I did it, only because I wanted to comply with Apples wishes so they'd help me, but they weren't helping and Java has nothing to do with the network adapter, so that was useless advice too.
Apple seem to have no idea there is a problem, even though Google has pages and pages of people saying the same as me, and their own discussion forums have thousands of people complaining https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2664670?start=0&tstart=0
Finally, late yesterday whilst speaking to d.ck head number 3 at Apple support, we found a forum post talking about a fix, 10.7.1 update. I told d. head number 3 about the update and he suggested I applied it. So I did and everything looked great, for a whole evening.
This morning, I switched on again and the same thing, slow remote desktop, choppy unusable phone. Remember the phone needs less than 20k for a conversation, thats 0.2 meg. Speedtest again showing a whole meg both ways.
I called apple support again, this time being a little forceful, and I've asked for this to be escalated, but the bottom line is - they have no fix, they don't aknowledge this as a problem and I was told LION is new, so maybe it's got a bug..
I told the guy on the phone this is a network driver issue, the intermittency of the problem shows that and the Apple's lack of settings for the network adapter means the unit is autonegotiating with the router and choosing speed and duplex settings on its own. Sometimes it does that correctly, other times not and the connection although fast has a lot of noise / packet loss / corruption.
I've found a workaround, you put the unit to sleep and wake it up again and it runs fast until the next shutdown. Not really acceptable seeing as I was paying for "the cream of the crop".
I will definately not be recommending Apple products, and i'll certainly not be replacing the Windows laptops in my business with Apple's toytown system- i'd go out of business if I had to rely on this.
All there is left now, is to look at Boot camp and see if I can wipe this waste of space linux hack from the unit and install Windows 7.

I started using computers more than 30 years ago when I was 5, I had my first IBM PC at the age of 10 and have never had any interest in paying over the odds for an Apple mac mainly because I saw the Mac as a kind of "Can't open nothing", one mouse buttoned retard of the computer world.
That is, until now.
I set up an online business 3 years ago and rented a dedicated server and set the whole business up in a cloud, so to speak. Having done that, all I needed a laptop for was a remote desktop connection and to run a SIP phone (Internet phone).
My PC based laptops had almost nothing installed on them, and I wasn't using software on the laptop itself, I was using remote desktop, so - why not try a MAC? The new Macbook Air 11 is small, light and made of metal and glass so should be robust enough to travel with me.
I have to say, this was the worst move I've ever made.
I opened the new shiny macbook and the first thing I noticed was that the internet seemed hit and miss. Moving around the room I managed to find a spot whereby pages woud load quickly. Strange, my £200 acer laptop was sh.t fast everywhere in the house. No matter, I packed it back away and carried on working on the Windows machine.
I've come to Newquay this week, and i've started to try and use the Macbook again in a hotel. The wireless signal in the room is low, and speedtest shows about 1 meg down and 3/4 meg up. That may sound bad to you, but remote desktop uses about 5k/sec (modem dial up speed) and the softphone, well, my Asterisk VOIP setup is confugured to use the GSM codec so that's 8k/sec each way + overheads.
This whole setup was deliberately designed to be "thin" so I can travel with ease and work on bad connections like USB internet sticks.
Anyhow, the Macbook was unable to hold a stable connection to the remote desktop or SIP phone, even though the speed test showed a whopping 1 meg up and down. What you may not be aware of is that there is more to a connection than the speed, there is the quality as well. How many packets are lost / how much "jitter" is on the line.
Anyhow, we're not living in the 3rd world, I ran a PINGTEST and it showed a small amount of jitter but told me the line was class B, online games may suffer but voip should be fine.
I unpacked the Acer, placed it in exactly the same spot as the Apple had sat in and it worked beautifully with 1 bar of wireless signal, all day long. Phone calls were clear.
So you know now what I'm thinking. I'm sitting here with my £200 acer because I can't use the £1500 macbook air 11. I paid nearly sixteen hundred pounds for this piece of .... and it doesn't ...... work. Time to contact Apple support.
2nd Mistake!
Representitive 1: - Told me that I can't compare the Macbook Air to the Acer, the Acer has Google Chrome and everybody knows Google Chrome is the fastest browser. I was told there was nothing more he could do, its probably a bad line at the hotel. When I explained the Acer works fine for voip I was told well, maybe it is getting a better signal. I explained the Acer has the cheapest possible parts inside it and paid 1500 for this macbook, expecting it to have quality parts inside and was told I'd paid for the size, because its so small but its not considered "powerful". Apple do you train your staff? Clearly not.
Thank god I wasn't paying to talk to this moron.
Representitive 2: - Had no idea what packet loss or Jitter was, got me to do a speedtest and said that looks fine. Then he got me to remove the WIFI adapter and re add it in the network settings.
Guess what, nothing changed, its still the same hardware and software.
Representitive 3: - Still not really understanding "quality" issues with the networking interface, I was asked to install the latest Java client. I did it, only because I wanted to comply with Apples wishes so they'd help me, but they weren't helping and Java has nothing to do with the network adapter, so that was useless advice too.
Apple seem to have no idea there is a problem, even though Google has pages and pages of people saying the same as me, and their own discussion forums have thousands of people complaining https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2664670?start=0&tstart=0
Finally, late yesterday whilst speaking to d.ck head number 3 at Apple support, we found a forum post talking about a fix, 10.7.1 update. I told d. head number 3 about the update and he suggested I applied it. So I did and everything looked great, for a whole evening.
This morning, I switched on again and the same thing, slow remote desktop, choppy unusable phone. Remember the phone needs less than 20k for a conversation, thats 0.2 meg. Speedtest again showing a whole meg both ways.
I called apple support again, this time being a little forceful, and I've asked for this to be escalated, but the bottom line is - they have no fix, they don't aknowledge this as a problem and I was told LION is new, so maybe it's got a bug..
I told the guy on the phone this is a network driver issue, the intermittency of the problem shows that and the Apple's lack of settings for the network adapter means the unit is autonegotiating with the router and choosing speed and duplex settings on its own. Sometimes it does that correctly, other times not and the connection although fast has a lot of noise / packet loss / corruption.
I've found a workaround, you put the unit to sleep and wake it up again and it runs fast until the next shutdown. Not really acceptable seeing as I was paying for "the cream of the crop".
I will definately not be recommending Apple products, and i'll certainly not be replacing the Windows laptops in my business with Apple's toytown system- i'd go out of business if I had to rely on this.
All there is left now, is to look at Boot camp and see if I can wipe this waste of space linux hack from the unit and install Windows 7.

Verizon FIOS Intermittent Packet Loss Problem - How to Convince Verizon Support it's NOT ME

Hi,
I have been having a problem with Verizon FIOS Internet AND Phone since Thursday afternoon.
Basically I have intermittent outages several times a day of 15-40 seconds where my download doesn't work, but upload still does. This happens on BOTH my phone and internet. Therefore it's not my router or computer equipment causing the problem.
Here's what happens:
- On the internet: I have a periodic download problem where I can receive no data for about 15 - 40 seconds. After that it returns to normal
- On the phone: If I'm on the phone at the same time then during that period of internet loss I also can not hear anything that the person I am talking to says. However they can hear me just fine (ie. download only problem)
I have been talking to Verizon technical support and they have blamed my router and ONT. I have tried switching off the router, and using a different one. Also they have replaced the ONT twice.
* This problem occurs on BOTH the phone and internet at the same time. This clearly suggests the problem is not in my own house.
In fact I know exactly where the problem lies. I did a traceroute to google below:
Tracing route to google.com [74.125.113.106]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1     4 ms     1 ms    <1 ms 192.168.1.1
2     5 ms     4 ms     4 ms L300.NWRKNJ-VFTTP-122.verizon-gni.net [74.105.157.1]
3     9 ms     8 ms     7 ms G2-0-0-1822.NWRKNJ-LCR-08.verizon-gni.net [130.81.133.156]
4    11 ms     8 ms     7 ms P15-0.NWRKNJ-LCR-07.verizon-gni.net [130.81.30.148]
5     9 ms     6 ms     7 ms so-5-0-0-0.NWRK-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.29.8]
6     7 ms     6 ms     7 ms 0.so-7-0-0.XL3.EWR6.ALTER.NET [152.63.19.177]
7     9 ms    10 ms     9 ms 0.so-1-0-1.XL3.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.0.213]
8     9 ms     9 ms     9 ms TenGigE0-6-0-0.GW8.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.22.41]
9    33 ms    31 ms    35 ms google-gw.customer.alter.net [152.179.72.62]
10     8 ms    11 ms    10 ms 209.85.252.215
11    18 ms    17 ms    16 ms 209.85.249.11
12    31 ms    29 ms    29 ms 209.85.241.222
13    30 ms    29 ms    29 ms 209.85.241.207
14    41 ms    39 ms    34 ms 209.85.243.1
15    27 ms    27 ms    29 ms vw-in-f106.1e100.net [74.125.113.106]
Trace complete.
Then I pinged each device for hops 2-4. When the problem occurs the first one in the hop - 74.105.157.1 - runs fine. The second device - 130.81.133.156 - times out, and all other devices further down the chain time out. This clearly suggest that the device:
130.81.133.156 has major problems.
I have mentioned this to tech support, but they have no way for me to send them logs. Apparently the support technicians at Verizon can not be trusted with even the most basic of tools like email and the web. They also shield me from the NT (Network technician), who is so special that even the tech support guys are only allowed to text chat with him, not actually talk to him. I have enough logs here to clearly show what the problem is.
The latest from tech support is that they are sending yet another guy by my house tomorrow to witness this problem firsthand. Then he will call support that will text chat with the NT, and MAYBE they'll start thinking it's not me.
My main question here is: "How do I get Verizon to believe it really could be a problem in their own network?"
Here are some threads from last year that explain exactly the same problem I'm having. So it wasn't just me:
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-TV-Technical-Assistance/Verizon-FIOS-intermittent-connection-drops...
http://forums.verizon.com/t5/FiOS-Internet/Intermittent-Network-Timeouts/m-p/28138
One person said Verizon finally fixed it by replacing a PON card. I'm not sure if this is the same problem as that though.
I am an avid Starcraft player and this is driving me crazy because I am getting dropped from my games all the time. Also phone conversations suck when there's these big lags where I can't hear who I'm talking to.
I have had Verizon FIOS internet for 3 years now and this is the first problem I've ever had with it. But I'm starting to get majorly frustrated at how long it's taking to resolve the problem.
Here is a sample of the ping logs I was talking about for different devices all at the same time.
Device 2 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=78ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=57ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=41ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=59ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=24ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=48ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=4ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=19ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 74.105.157.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=126
Device 3 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=253
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=253
Reply from 130.81.133.156: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=253
Device 4 in the Trace Route:
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=252
Reply from 130.81.30.148: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=252
Any help, thoughts, suggestions, etc would be great appreciated!
~David

I understand your logic, but you have not eliminated 74.105.157.1 as the problem. It could be allowing packets out, like outside callers hearing you, but not allow them back in. Since you have results pinging out, trying ping back in. Use this packet loss tool. You do not need to catch it when it's not working because this tool will ping your IP address (and all the hops in between) for up to 7 days. You will easily see when packet loss is occurring.
If it can successfully ping 74.105.157.1 when the problem occurrs, then 130.81.133.156 is not the issue. This may not help dealing with the personalities at Verizon, but it will help definitively knowing which device is the issue.

Wrong direction of Packet loss

Recently,I capture some RTP packets when user meeting the dialogue jitter and latency.
User A using the 3951 ip phone (IP address is x.x.125.206, and x.x.200.165 is the voice gateway's ip address ) , and user B using a mobile phone.
User A responds to me that she can't hear user B clearly.
This reflect to packets capture result should be packet lost at the in direction.
But the capture result show that packets loss happen at the out direction.
Could any body explain it for me?
Thanks a lot!

Probably you have captured RTP traffic near the voice gateway. Right?
I suppose that you have bidirectional packet loss.
In this case, if you use wireshark near one of the sources you can observe only one direction loss.
You must try to use wireshark in both network segments.
P.S. in the bottom of the your image we can see ip addresses of your net.
Regards.

Network issues. Packet loss when spray is used!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hi, I am not in a position to figure out, is it an issue with my server or my network. I run spray and find packet loss...what should I suspect?
In one way, the packet loss is 0%, while the other way, there is 90% loss. Both machines are located in two different buildings.
here is the output.
bash-2.03# spray 172.16.59.7
sending 1162 packets of length 86 to 172.16.59.7 ...
no packets dropped by 172.16.59.7
34031 packets/sec, 2926694 bytes/sec
bash-2.03# spray 172.16.59.7
sending 1162 packets of length 86 to 172.16.59.7 ...
no packets dropped by 172.16.59.7
33512 packets/sec, 2882044 bytes/sec
bash-2.03# spray 172.16.59.238
sending 1162 packets of length 86 to 172.16.59.238 ...
205 packets (17.642%) dropped by 172.16.59.238
28146 packets/sec, 2420575 bytes/sec
bash-2.05$ spray giove
sending 1162 packets of length 86 to giove ...
1052 packets (90.534%) dropped by giove
7 packets/sec, 629 bytes/sec
bash-2.05$ spray giove
sending 1162 packets of length 86 to giove ...
1052 packets (90.534%) dropped by giove
7 packets/sec, 629 bytes/sec
bash-2.05$ spray giove
sending 1162 packets of length 86 to giove ...
1052 packets (90.534%) dropped by giove
7 packets/sec, 629 bytes/sec
bash-2.05$ spray giove
sending 1162 packets of length 86 to giove ...
1052 packets (90.534%) dropped by giove
7 packets/sec, 630 bytes/sec
bash-2.05$ spray giove
sending 1162 packets of length 86 to giove ...
1052 packets (90.534%) dropped by giove
7 packets/sec, 630 bytes/sec
bash-2.05$ spray giove
sending 1162 packets of length 86 to giove ...
1052 packets (90.534%) dropped by giove
7 packets/sec, 630 bytes/sec

http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5166/6mbb1kqhl?a=view
spray is not useful as a networking benchmark, as it uses unreliable connectionless transports, UDP for example. spray can report a large number of packets dropped when the drops were caused by spray sending packets faster than they can be buffered locally, that is, before the packets get to the network medium.

Increasing Frequency of Packet Loss

Has anyone else been experiencing packet loss more frequently in the last month? I've noticed it a few times when streaming shows or Twitch and lately it's been pretty severe when playing League of Legends.

What state are you located in? Twitch in general has been having tons of issues that they aren't owning up to. I've had a ticket open with them for a month now showing that there is a ton of issues on their end.
However, I have been having issues with packet loss in other games. Mainly with routing through the main Los Angelas Data Center. This started a month ago for me as well. I used to get a latency of 20-30 through the LA Hub. Now it spikes anywhere from 200-300ms after a certain time of day (usually 6:00PM PST). Using ping plotter, I can clearly see that the LA hub is causing most of my issues and later down the route I'm getting 10-20% packet loss in 2 other hubs before I reach the data centers for the game I'm playing.
As a gamer, you'd know the difference between 20ms and 250ms, which is what I feel after 6pm pst. Verizon Support has not owned up that it is their issue so far and the support I've reached out to from the gaming companies can clearly point out that the issue is with the Verizon data center at different hops.
I'm getting annoyed with this and it hasn't been fixed for well over a month.

7613 Router - Packet-loss on a LAN link between 6704 and ES 2T

Hi
After connecting two ends of a 10 Gig LAN Link from a 6704 on one 7613 to a ES 2T on another 7613 , then we have packet loss on that link beyond a specific traffic limit !
Please note that after changing both boards to ES 2T we have no problem and LAN/WAN mode is also checked .

Ash wrote:
It's dropping pings, you can see that clearly from the above. It's intermittent. Whilst a drop in pings isn't the definitive sign of packetloss, the way in which it's doing it is.
If it was going to drop it through flooding it simply wouldn't respond at all after the first few. It it was configured to not respond, it simply wouldn't.
Pings to any external source - (not to the device itself) are also failing intermittently. This indicates that a device along the traffic path is having issues.
I can screenshot a nice disconnection plug in games, but there's no real need.
The evidence is there if you know how to interpret it. This needs to be investigated.
A question for you then!
What happens when your router gets repeated pings from the same source?
Does it not block them as a possible DDOS attack?
The more gamers try this tactic the worse their traces will get & it will more than likely also affect other gamers interested in low latency through these same nodes!
Check the timings between the true source & destination by all means but please do not
unnecessarily stress individual points on the main ISP network backbones!
"I have this awful feeling someone is watching every move I make (one of my pet hates is router location tagging)." Marvin (A paranoid Android)

Bouts of packet loss and complete loss of connection

Ok forum, I give up! I need your help.
I have an E1200 and am time out and packet loss issues. The internet connection is fine for 30 seconds to five minuets and then everything times out for 15-20 seconds. Although it’s only a minor incontinence to web browsing, it makes playing games and watching videos a nightmare. “Lost connection to server error.” and the like…
This is what I have done to remedy the problem.
I upgraded to a new router, the e1200 I am currently using, from my Tenda 10/100 N. The problems where the same that I am experience currently and the reason I bought it in the firs place.
When I directly connect to the cable modem, I have no issues and everything is fine.
I have run a trace route and the second hop, (the router to the modem) is the choke point.
I have cloned the MAC address
I have updated the firmware and hard reset
I have throttled my MTU to automatic, 1500, and 1472. None making any difference.
I have disabled NAT and all that does is kill my internet connection
I have disabled all firewalls router and windows, no change.
I replaced the physical wire from the router to the modem.
I have disconnected all devices except one computer, and no difference.
I ran a DNS trace and I have… non routable local internet address 192.168.1.1
DNS-cac-lb-01.rr.com and DNS-cac-lb-02.rr.com
I am using windows 7 and my ISP is time Warner so-cal. Help me obiwan, you’re my only hope.

Sorry friend. I have not had the gaul to load the 1.0 firmware. I am 99% sure I have the 2.0 hardware. I did however unplug my modem for an hour and then try and reconnect. The result was a lossless environment for fifteen to twenty minuets (a long time for me.). But, I am right back still having the same problem. A friend gave me a new netgear router, I am going to try that and I am going to go to Timewarner and have them replace my modem just to make sure there is nothing wrong with the surfboard. I will report back with my findings.

Tons of packet loss and Verizon techs say its fine

As you can see from the below test ran from dslreports.com, I'm having a lot of packet loss issues. This has been going on for nearly two weeks now and tech support has been more of an annoyance than a help upto this point. I've talked to tech support at least 5 times only to be told my line test comes back fine, its normal, reset your modem, delete your cookies, is your pc old, etc. I've even had them vpn itno my system and run pings and they see the packet loss and all the issues I'm having first hand and still say it isn't a big deal. On more than one occasion I've had my modem data light just flashing and had to reset the modem and they suggest I just buy a new modem. Seriously, is this how bad tech support has gotten?
I've shown them test after test after test and the all come back pretty much the same... The thing is its been perfect for years and suddenly this and its like tech support wants to sweep it under the rug or something. I've had it suggested to me the packet loss and high pings when I'm not getting the packet loss is due to my pool being over populated. Like I'm ow getting ping averages of 250-300 instead of 30-40s, again when its not all timing out.
I've posted over on the dslreports forums asking about this as well as in the Verizon specific forums to the techs all with 0 replies from anything and was told to come here and see if anyone would be able to help.
I really not bother with the hassle of switching isps as ive been a loyal Verizon dsl customer for well over 5 years but at this point just knowing how bad tech support is alone might make me want to.
Can anyone offer any insight on what else to do or help on this possibly?
Thanks.
Test Loss Min
Latency Avg
Latency Max
Latency Pass
Fail Simple ping loss check
10secs of 40byte packets 2 per second 5% loss 137ms 141ms 148ms
warn low bandwidth stream
10secs of 56k/bit ping stream 512byte packets 6% loss 142ms 147ms 154ms
warn medium bandwidth stream
10secs of 128k/bit ping stream 512byte packets 2% loss 140ms 147ms 173ms
pass your first hop ping
stream of 40byte pings to 130.81.44.101 4% loss 118ms You are 19ms
to your first hop
pass Ping plot:
Ping plot:
From East Coast - USA to YOU Hop Host LOSS Rcv Sent Best Avg Worst 0 ae-2.bb-b.slr.lxa.us.oneandone.net 0% 60 60 0.46 2.29 59.98 1 te-2-1.bb-b.ms.mkc.us.oneandone.net 0% 60 60 0.92 1.89 36.10 2 64.209.105.233 0% 60 60 13.97 41.38 948.69 3 0.xe-8-2-0.BR3.CHI13.ALTER.NET 0% 60 60 26.13 30.80 80.28 4 0.ae3.CHI01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.NET 0% 60 60 26.49 27.84 88.62 5 P15-3.RONKVA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net 0% 60 60 54.25 55.01 56.32 6 P0-0.RONKVA-RONKVALK-ERXG02.verizon-gni.net 0% 60 60 116.80 121.05 130.35 7 pool-71-171-24-94.nwrknj.east.verizon.net 14% 52 60 142.49 147.61 169.10 (fail) From West Coast - USA to YOU Hop Host LOSS Rcv Sent Best Avg Worst 0 unknown.Level3.net 2% 59 60 0.64 16.67 150.86 1 ae-4-99.edge1.SanJose3.Level3.net 4% 58 60 1.15 5.12 59.35 2 4.68.63.146 0% 60 60 1.25 3.31 55.27 3 0.ae3.XL3.SJC7.ALTER.NET 0% 60 60 1.25 1.68 9.80 4 0.ge-6-3-0.XT1.DCA6.ALTER.NET 0% 60 60 75.58 77.85 108.89 5 0.so-4-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net 0% 60 60 75.52 80.78 136.25 6 P15-3.RONKVA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net 0% 60 60 90.25 91.97 94.08 7 P0-0.RONKVA-RONKVALK-ERXG02.verizon-gni.net 2% 59 60 154.03 159.68 164.42 8 pool-71-171-24-94.nwrknj.east.verizon.net 4% 58 60 175.74 183.27 187.00 (fail)

As you can see from the below test ran from dslreports.com, I'm having a lot of packet loss issues. This has been going on for nearly two weeks now and tech support has been more of an annoyance than a help upto this point. I've talked to tech support at least 5 times only to be told my line test comes back fine, its normal, reset your modem, delete your cookies, is your pc old, etc. I've even had them vpn itno my system and run pings and they see the packet loss and all the issues I'm having first hand and still say it isn't a big deal. On more than one occasion I've had my modem data light just flashing and had to reset the modem and they suggest I just buy a new modem. Seriously, is this how bad tech support has gotten?
I've shown them test after test after test and the all come back pretty much the same... The thing is its been perfect for years and suddenly this and its like tech support wants to sweep it under the rug or something. I've had it suggested to me the packet loss and high pings when I'm not getting the packet loss is due to my pool being over populated. Like I'm ow getting ping averages of 250-300 instead of 30-40s, again when its not all timing out.
I've posted over on the dslreports forums asking about this as well as in the Verizon specific forums to the techs all with 0 replies from anything and was told to come here and see if anyone would be able to help.
I really not bother with the hassle of switching isps as ive been a loyal Verizon dsl customer for well over 5 years but at this point just knowing how bad tech support is alone might make me want to.
Can anyone offer any insight on what else to do or help on this possibly?
Thanks.
Test Loss Min
Latency Avg
Latency Max
Latency Pass
Fail Simple ping loss check
10secs of 40byte packets 2 per second 5% loss 137ms 141ms 148ms
warn low bandwidth stream
10secs of 56k/bit ping stream 512byte packets 6% loss 142ms 147ms 154ms
warn medium bandwidth stream
10secs of 128k/bit ping stream 512byte packets 2% loss 140ms 147ms 173ms
pass your first hop ping
stream of 40byte pings to 130.81.44.101 4% loss 118ms You are 19ms
to your first hop
pass Ping plot:
Ping plot:
From East Coast - USA to YOU Hop Host LOSS Rcv Sent Best Avg Worst 0 ae-2.bb-b.slr.lxa.us.oneandone.net 0% 60 60 0.46 2.29 59.98 1 te-2-1.bb-b.ms.mkc.us.oneandone.net 0% 60 60 0.92 1.89 36.10 2 64.209.105.233 0% 60 60 13.97 41.38 948.69 3 0.xe-8-2-0.BR3.CHI13.ALTER.NET 0% 60 60 26.13 30.80 80.28 4 0.ae3.CHI01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.NET 0% 60 60 26.49 27.84 88.62 5 P15-3.RONKVA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net 0% 60 60 54.25 55.01 56.32 6 P0-0.RONKVA-RONKVALK-ERXG02.verizon-gni.net 0% 60 60 116.80 121.05 130.35 7 pool-71-171-24-94.nwrknj.east.verizon.net 14% 52 60 142.49 147.61 169.10 (fail) From West Coast - USA to YOU Hop Host LOSS Rcv Sent Best Avg Worst 0 unknown.Level3.net 2% 59 60 0.64 16.67 150.86 1 ae-4-99.edge1.SanJose3.Level3.net 4% 58 60 1.15 5.12 59.35 2 4.68.63.146 0% 60 60 1.25 3.31 55.27 3 0.ae3.XL3.SJC7.ALTER.NET 0% 60 60 1.25 1.68 9.80 4 0.ge-6-3-0.XT1.DCA6.ALTER.NET 0% 60 60 75.58 77.85 108.89 5 0.so-4-0-0.RES-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net 0% 60 60 75.52 80.78 136.25 6 P15-3.RONKVA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net 0% 60 60 90.25 91.97 94.08 7 P0-0.RONKVA-RONKVALK-ERXG02.verizon-gni.net 2% 59 60 154.03 159.68 164.42 8 pool-71-171-24-94.nwrknj.east.verizon.net 4% 58 60 175.74 183.27 187.00 (fail)

A strange packet loss in a switching environment.

I have a switching environment with four switches as the diagram showing below. SW1 and SW2 are two Cisco 6509-E switches, SW3 and SW4 are two Cisco 4848E switches, Host 1 and Host 2 are Solaris servers.
The original issue reported was that the SSH session between two servers were not be able to established. Tcpdump result on the servers indicated there was packet loss in the network. Instead of randomly lost some of the packets, only specific packets were lost in the network.
When running ssh server on Host2 and running ssh client on Host1, the Diff-Hellman Key Exchange Reply packet from Host2 to Host1 was lost.
When running ssh server on Host1 and running ssh client on Host2, the Diff-Hellman GEX Init pakcet from Host2 to Host1 was lost.
There are no ACL configured on the switch interfaces.
The packet loss seems targeted for Diff-Hellman related packets, which is really weird. Does any one know why it happened?

I work with the individual reporting this issue and turns out a bad line card on the 6509-E where these 4948e access switches trunk to is the ultimate root cause. I don't believe there were any syslog or other indicators of the failure and it was semi-masked by the fallout being dependent on where the VLAN roots were homed so it wasn't consistent. Ultimately when the VLAN roots were reviewed in-depth, it did make complete sense on the impact being seen on just some access switches and ports and not others.
I believe I've written up all the pertinent facts here or perhaps left a few out and they will be filled in or corrected later.

Packet Loss When Extending Network?

Hi there, everyone.
I just purchased the Airport Extreme AC after upgrading to 802.11AC devices in the home. On its own, the Extreme AC performs flawlessly - consistent connections, max speed my ISP provides, no-lag, no studdering, no packet loss. I was dissapointed with the range of the device at the far ends of my home, so I set up my previous generation Airport Extreme to extend the network.
It extends the network fine, speeds are about half of what I get at the source, but the issue is that when it is part of the network, I experience packet loss, anywhere from 3% to 8%. I've tested this multiple times, unplugging, testing, replugging, testing. It happens both wirelessly and through ethernet. The issue is no question caused by the previous gen Airport extending the network.
Any help here would be great!
Setup:
- Motorla Surfboard SB6141
- WAN into Airport Extreme AC
- Previous generation Airport Extreme to extend the network, no special settings.
Don't be afraid to use techincal terminology to help me. I can follow and understand the majority of it, as I'm pretty into all of this.

I'm not aware of anything that has changed in the 802.11ac version of the AirPort base stations that would induce the packet loss that you are seeing with an extended network over using an earlier generation. I am assuming, of course, that you are extending another Apple wireless router ... correct?
Typically I would recommend that you would review the placement of the extending base station to be sure that it is in the optimal spot to reproduce the signal with the greatest amount of bandwidth possible. (Ref: This AirPort User Tip)

5508 snmp packet loss

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for