/610 is missing in pay result

why our /610 is showing up last month but hasn't come up this month? We always have it and it was working fine until this month. Could anyone give me some clue? Thank you.

Basically the ENDDA for 0209 for th employee and also, the validity of that Tax authority in the system.
Sisnce the only reason of these wagetypes related to taxes to not to show up is the date ranges.
Regards,
Amit

Similar Messages

  • UCM 11g File missing from search result although file is accessable

    When I do search without any criteria in UCM 11g, some files missing from search result although I know the files were checked into UCM already since I'm able to see these files using url similar to:
    http://ucm/cs/idcplg?idcService=GET_FILE&dID=12345
    or use following url to get document information:
    http://ucm/cs/idcplg?idcService=DOC_INFO&dID=12345
    the file is not in the search resule even search by ID.
    also, the seach result say "displaying 1-20" but only display few files (e.g. 2 files, less than 20)
    Is this a known problem? the same search was working in UCM 10 perfectly.
    Thanks

    The query seems able to retrieve the missing document. for example, I search by content ID, in the audit log (eanbled as you mentioned) give th efollowing information:
    fusionappsattachments/6     09.13 06:22:03.878     IdcServer-3474     --- @ResultSet SearchResults ---
    fusionappsattachments/6     09.13 06:22:03.878     IdcServer-3474     numFields=66,*numRows=1*,currentRow=0
    also, the infomation following above give the deteail field information which match with the missing document.
    I looks like UCM just did not bring it to UI as part of search result.
    This seems match with my another finding as I mentioned earlier: the seach result say "displaying 1-20" but only display few files (e.g. 2 files, less than 20)
    it seems query did find the documents but UI did not show it.
    Not sure if this is a known bug.

  • What is the best way to reconcile gl account postings with pay results ?

    Hi experts
    what is the best way to reconcile gl account postings with pay results ?
    is it running wage type reporter ?
    or is there any otehr way .. i have variances in wtr n gl posting for a few employees.
    Regards

    Hi,
    Match Payroll Journal (PC00_M40_LJN - Payroll Journal ) with Wage type Report.(PC00_M99_CWTR - Wage Type Reporter )
    Finally verify the Posting amount (PCP0) with Payroll Journal....(PC00_M40_LJN - Payroll Journal )
    This should solve your issue...
    Regards,
    Veeram

  • For all entries : lines are missing in the results

    Hi all,
    I have a problem with my abap code.
    some lines are missing in the results.
    I have check the note 65554 but i use the version 6.40
    TYPES: BEGIN OF wys_bseg,
             bukrs TYPE bsad-bukrs,
             belnr TYPE bsad-belnr,
             gjahr TYPE bsad-gjahr,
             augbl TYPE bseg-augbl,
             augdt type bseg-augdt,
             hkont TYPE bseg-hkont,
             WRBTR type bseg-WRBTR,
             KOART type bseg-KOART,
             SHKZG type bseg-SHKZG,
           END OF wys_bseg.
    TYPES: begin of wys_bsas,
             bukrs TYPE bsas-bukrs,
             hkont TYPE bsas-hkont,
             augbl TYPE bsas-augbl,
             augdt type bseg-augdt,
             gjahr TYPE bsas-gjahr,
             belnr TYPE bsas-belnr,
             waers TYPE bsas-waers,
             blart TYPE bsas-blart,
             gsber TYPE bsas-gsber,
             dmbtr TYPE bsas-dmbtr,
             xblnr TYPE bsas-xblnr,
             SHKZG type bseg-SHKZG,
             zmntfact TYPE bsas-WRBTR,
           end of wys_bsas.
    DATA: wt_bseg_tmp TYPE wys_bseg OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA : wt_bsas type wys_bsas occurs 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
        sort wt_bsas by bukrs belnr gjahr.
        DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM wt_bsas COMPARING bukrs belnr gjahr.
    IF NOT wt_bsas[] IS INITIAL.
        select bukrs belnr gjahr augbl augdt hkont WRBTR KOART SHKZG from
    bseg into table wt_bseg_tmp
                  for all entries in wt_bsas
                  where bukrs EQ wt_bsas-bukrs
                    and belnr EQ wt_bsas-belnr
                    and gjahr EQ wt_bsas-gjahr
                    and koart EQ 'D'.
    ENDIF.

    Hi
    Yes Arun is right, INTO TABLE option delete automatically the duplicates lines, so you make sure to insert all keys in order to load all record.
    Insert the field BUZEI in the structure of internal table:
    TYPES: BEGIN OF wys_bseg,
             bukrs TYPE bsad-bukrs,
             belnr TYPE bsad-belnr,
             gjahr TYPE bsad-gjahr,
             buzei type bseg-buzei, <------ New field
             augbl TYPE bseg-augbl,
             augdt type bseg-augdt,
             hkont TYPE bseg-hkont,
             WRBTR type bseg-WRBTR,
             KOART type bseg-KOART,
             SHKZG type bseg-SHKZG,
           END OF wys_bseg.
    Max

  • Programmatically creating a Rendezvous : missing variable in Result container

    Hi everybody,
    For my tests purpose, I need to programmatically create a sequence. In this sequence, I need to insert Rendezvous steps.
    Everything works fine when creating them, but when I execute the sequence / steps created this error always show up for rendezvous step : 
    Unknown variable 'TimeoutOccured' ; Error accessing item 'Result.TimeoutOccured'
    According to the TS help, this variable should be created when I configure the step for the rendezvous operation. Drag and dropping the step from the TS insertion palette works fine, and the variable is created when chosing the operation 'rendezvous'. But when doing the same thing through programmation, the variable is not created.
    Here are the steps executed to create the RDV step :
    I create a new step using method Engine.NewStep
    I set the step name using Step.Name
    I set the rendezvous properties using a statement (Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep is the variable holding the the step reference) :
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.Operation = 1, //A value that specifies the operation for the step to perform. The valid values are 0 = Create, 1 = Rendezvous, and 2 = Get Status
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.NameOrRefExpr = Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RefName, //Contains the Rendezvous Name expression for the Create operation and the Rendezvous Name or Reference expression for all other Rendezvous operations
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.TimeoutEnabled = False, //The Timeout Enabled setting for the Rendezvous operation
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.ErrorOnTimeout = True, //The Timeout Causes Run-Time Error setting for the Rendezvous operation
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.RendezvousCountExpr = Parameters.NbBranches, //The Number of Threads Per Rendezvous expression for the Create operation
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.Lifetime = 3, //A value that specifies the Lifetime setting to use for the Create operation. The valid values are 0 = Same as Sequence, 1 = Same as Thread, 2 = Use Object Reference, and 3 = Same as Execution
    4. Then I insert the step in my current sequence using method Sequence.InsertStep
    Everything works fine, the rendezvous step is perfectly created and all properties are set finely. However, the variable TimeouOccured is missing in the Step.Result container (TS help says that this propoerty exists when the step is configured as a rendezvous operation (cf. Operation = 1)).
    Am I doing something wrong somewhere ? Why is this variable missing ?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi Doug,
    TS help says that this property exists when the step is configured as a rendezvous operation (cf. Operation = 1)... So shouldn't it be created when I create / insert the step ?
    I find it very weired to add a subproperty to a StepType, in the Result container...

  • When i click on itunes to open, message says: the registry settings used by the itune drivers for importing and burning cds and dvds are missing. this can result from installing other cd burning software. Reinstall itunes.  I'm inexperienced. Please help

    When I click on itunes, I get a message that says, "the registry settings used by the itune drivers for importing and burning cds and dvds are missing.  this can result from installing other cd burning software.  Reinstall itunes."  I am a really inexperienced computer user. My computer is a windows 7.  Would someone please walk me through this or tell me where to find information on how to do this. Thanking in advance, Laurie

    Check out this Apple article -> iTunes for Windows: "Registry settings" warning when opening iTunes
    The article will walk you through reinstalling iTunes and then checking for or creating device filters. Did it help? Did you run into any problems?

  • ReentrantLock is missing wake signals resulting in a deadlock

    We are hitting an issue with ReentrantLock where it is missing the awake signal resulting in a deadlock. Here is the thread dump for the same. As you can see, Thread-55 is blocked on acquiring the lock, which is not locked by any other thread. This issue is very similar to
    http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6822370 which happens in Sunspot JVM.
    "Thread-55" id=143 idx=0x2a4 tid=9388 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
    -- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock$NonfairSync@0x00000001A21AC9A8
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
    at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:811)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:867)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1201)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock.lockInterruptibly(ReentrantLock.java:312)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:396)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ExecutorCompletionService.take(ExecutorCompletionService.java:164)[inlined]
    at com/teneo/esa/common/textengine/expander/StemIndexManager.isStemPresent(StemIndexManager.java:1345)[optimized]
    at com/teneo/esa/common/textengine/expander/StemIndexManager.buildStemIndex(StemIndexManager.java:425)[optimized]
    at com/teneo/esa/common/textengine/expander/StemIndexManager.buildStemIndex(StemIndexManager.java:825)
    at com/teneo/esa/analytics/stemindex/StemIndexAnalyticsImpl.process(StemIndexAnalyticsImpl.java:155)
    at com/teneo/esa/analytics/stemindex/StemIndexAnalyticsService$1.run(StemIndexAnalyticsService.java:128)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace
    "pool-7-thread-1" id=170 idx=0x310 tid=5524 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
    -- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
    at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
    at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace
    "pool-7-thread-2" id=171 idx=0x314 tid=15588 prio=
    2012-10-04 13:18:37,908 INFO [STDOUT] (RMI TCP Connection(1465)-10.65.59.167:) 5 alive, parked, native_blocked
    -- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
    at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
    at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace
    "pool-7-thread-3" id=172 idx=0x318 tid=6056 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
    -- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
    at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
    at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace
    "pool-7-thread-4" id=173 idx=0x31c tid=6312 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
    -- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
    at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
    at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace
    "pool-7-thread-5" id=174 idx=0x320 tid=15132 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
    -- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
    at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
    at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace
    "pool-7-thread-6" id=175 idx=0x324 tid=10636 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
    -- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V
    2012-10-04 13:18:37,908 INFO [STDOUT] (RMI TCP Connection(1465)-10.65.59.167:) (Native Method)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
    at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
    at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace
    "pool-7-thread-7" id=176 idx=0x328 tid=17820 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
    -- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
    at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
    at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace
    "pool-7-thread-8" id=177 idx=0x32c tid=6516 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
    -- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
    at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
    at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
    at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
    at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace
    Environment:
    VM Version: Jrockit R28.2.3
    JDK: 1.6.0_31
    OS: Windows 2008
    Let me know if you need any details.
    Thanks,
    Snehal
    Edited by: 957943 on Oct 4, 2012 11:38 AM

    Hi,
    Open a ticket with support to file a BUG with JVM team.
    Or try to upgrade your JVM to avoid this issue.
    Regards,
    Kal

  • Image missing from Search results

    When my search results come up, in the top left corner of the
    results is a red x indicating a missing image. Checking the
    properties of this image, it is a 28 x 30 pixel image. Address just
    shows
    http://robohelp/Robo/BIN/ (our
    intranet site is
    http://robohelp). What is this missing
    image? and how can I make it appear (or delete).
    Also strange thing happened this morning where clicking on
    the search button brought up all the main navigation buttons again
    where the search results should appear and also search field did
    not work at all. I closed browser and started new session and all
    is well now, but RoboHelp does some strange stuff sometimes.
    Thanks.

    try to perform the below steps and check if it works or else we need to wait till Exchange 2013 SP1 which they have planned to bring digital signature message in exchange
    Outlook 2007
    In Outlook 2007, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
    In Outlook, click Tools, Instant Search, and then click
    Instant Search.
    When the Microsoft Office Outlook dialog appears, you should see the following:
    Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
    New items are indexed when they arrive.
    0 items remaining in "Mailbox -<<var>username</var>>"
    0 items remaining across all open mailboxes.
    Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013
    In Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
    In Outlook, click in the Search box.
    Click the Search tab, click Search Tools, and then click
    Indexing Status.
    When the Indexing Status dialog appears, you should see the following:
    Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
    0 items remaining to be indexed.
    Exchange Queries

  • Windows 8 - Folder Redirection policy missing from GP Results.

    Hi guys! This has been giving me a hard time the last day or so.  I've got some Win8 machines in our 2003 domain. I've got some GPO's applying with WMI filtering for win8 machines. Mostly these are ok, but i'm having a huge problem with Desktop Folder
    Redirection. 
    After a fresh build and first login, everything works fine. Drive mappings are all there and the Desktop is redirected to to users home drive on the file server. This is being done with Advanced settings using group membership and set to "Create a folder
    for each user under the root path" \\dfs1\users. This location is correct and permissions are fine of course as everything works for a while.
    After a little while or some unknown event, this redirection stops working.
    check these two screengrabs. These are different users on different machines. The machines are identical, are in the same OU and have the same image. The users are different but have the same group memberships and are in the same OU. 
    This is a working machine. Not the Folder Redirection component was processed and the Policy exists.
    This machine is not working. Folder Redirection is processed, but the Policy is missing. Running a gpresult /v on this machine yields: 
     Folder Redirection
         N/A
    It was working fine yesterday and this morning. Now at some point a policy refresh stopped it from working. Just trying to figure out what! These are the exact settings currently in place for our win 7 machines which all work just fine. Going a bit crazy
    tbh and usually when i post questions i figure it out shortly afterwards anyway huhu. Any help is appreciated! 
    h 

    well I though this issue was gone when I switched to a new Task Sequence in SCCM every machine that was built with that was working fine with Folder Redirection happening as it's meant to be. That was for about a week, now it's back to not working.
    here's a snippet of the gpsvc.log file pertaining to FD.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOs(User): Processing extension Folder Redirection
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ReadStatus: Read Extension's Previous status successfully.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CompareGPOLists: The lists are the same.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CompareGPOLists: The lists are the same.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 GPLockPolicySection: Sid = S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230, dwTimeout = 30000, dwFlags = 0x0
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CGPApplicationService::LockPolicySection.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Beginning WaitForSingleObject.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Completed WaitForSingleObject.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CPolicyCriticalSectionCollection: LockPolicySection called for user <S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230>
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 SID = S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 bMachine = 0
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 Global Sync Lock Called
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 Writer Lock got immediately.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 Global Lock taken successfully
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: Entering for extension Folder Redirection
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 UserPolicyCallback: Setting status UI to Applying Folder Redirection policy...
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: No changes. CSE will not be passed in the IwbemServices intf ptr
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 CGroupPolicySession::QueueItemForPolicyApplication::-- (Status: 997)
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 CGPApplicationService::UserLogonEvent::-- (Status: 997)
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: Extension Folder Redirection returned 0x0.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: Extension Folder Redirection status was not updated because there was no changes and no transition or rsop wasn't enabled
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CGPApplicationService::UnLockPolicySection.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Beginning WaitForSingleObject.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Completed WaitForSingleObject.
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 Setting GPsession state = 1
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 User SID = <S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230>
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CPolicyCriticalSectionCollection: UnLocked successfully
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 CGroupPolicySession::QueueItemForPolicyApplication::++ (bTriggered: 0, bConsole: 1)
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 PolicyApplicationState is True.
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 AsyncThreadsProcessing is False.

  • Acrobat 8 Slow Encoding from Word, Missing Text in Result!

    I am getting so frustrated with Acrobat 8.x.. not only do I have to put up with the 90-second hang after launching ANY PDF doc, but when I author docs out of Word and Quark, many times it takes ten minutes or more to export a 1-page doc and 40% of the text is MISSING! In other words, after waiting what seems an exhorbitant amount of time for a Word doc to export, I can't even use the PDF I exported because nearly half the text is missing. I'm exporting a single page price list in a basic table format. I've done this scores of times under Acrobat 7.x and it never took more than a couple of seconds and ALWAYS was WYSIWYG. Acrobat 8.x is just hopelessly broken. I've never had these problems with 7.x and earlier.
    Unless there is a quick fix, my question is can I install the older Acrobat 7 and uninstall the Acrobat 8 that is part of CS3 and have 7.x work like it did for me in the past?

    QuarkXpress and Word 2003 are the two apps I make PDFs from the most often. And Acrobat is version 8.1.
    Win XP Pro SP2, 3.5GHz quad core with 4GB RAM, BTW.
    PDF maker icons appear in all applications that can export a doc, and it is definately Adobe Distiller that is running when I click the "make PDF" icon in Word.
    I found a workaround--rebooting and making the PDF first thing before I do anything else. Apparently, this version needs all the resources of a freshly-booted XP in order to work properly. After an hour of use, Acrobat breaks down again and slows to a crawl, makes incomplete documents again. Just have to completely restart anytime I make a PDF--or revert to Acrobat 7 for fully-functional PDF maker that works any time of the day or nite.

  • Signed messages are missing from search results in a shared mailbox

    We recently completed moving all user mailboxes to Exchange 2013 from Exchange 2010.  We also have a policy that disables the 'download shared mailboxes' option in Outlook as it cause .ost files to get cumbersome and cause performance problems.  This
    means that shared mailboxes that users have open are all in 'Online' mode.  Since the move to 2013, when users search against a folder in a shared mailbox, the only items that are returned are unsigned messages.  Our customer base very frequently
    signs email and these signed messages do not show up in results.  This was working in Exchange 2010 so our users are frustrated by the sudden inability to receive complete and accurate search results.
    If they perform a search of their local mailbox, which is using Cached mode, they are searching against their local index and they can find signed messages.  But since the shared mailbox is not cached to their local system, they are relying on the Exchange
    server index and it does not seem to be indexing any signed messages.
    Does anyone know how to force Exchange 2013 to index signed messages?

    try to perform the below steps and check if it works or else we need to wait till Exchange 2013 SP1 which they have planned to bring digital signature message in exchange
    Outlook 2007
    In Outlook 2007, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
    In Outlook, click Tools, Instant Search, and then click
    Instant Search.
    When the Microsoft Office Outlook dialog appears, you should see the following:
    Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
    New items are indexed when they arrive.
    0 items remaining in "Mailbox -<<var>username</var>>"
    0 items remaining across all open mailboxes.
    Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013
    In Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
    In Outlook, click in the Search box.
    Click the Search tab, click Search Tools, and then click
    Indexing Status.
    When the Indexing Status dialog appears, you should see the following:
    Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
    0 items remaining to be indexed.
    Exchange Queries

  • How to take report for Employee past pay results!!!

    Hi Experts,
    I would like to know how to generate report for employee's past pay roll, which gives information pertaining to employee's pay hike if any and other details.
    Please advice...subbu14blueatgmail.com
    Thank you in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Subbu

    Hi,
    Pc00_M40_calc though you can do the live run then
    go PC00_m99_CWTR here you can select the payroll period button
    There you can give the payroll area and selection periods.
    Then you can give the  company code, and what ever you can personnel area wise and all.
    Below that screen you need to select the Lay out variant.
    Then you can execute that report.
    Then you will get the wage types and the amount.
    Any query's let me know.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Revathi.

  • Ivolume -- anybody know how long trial is... what's missing from Pay ver.

    First of all sorry if wrong spot... And yes I could contact the vendor...but thought folks here might know.
    I download ivolume...I love it...and am more than happy to pay for it...
    I expected the free trial version to expire by now...but it hasn't...how long do you get with the free version...and what doesn't it have that the paid version does.
    Again, sorry if inappropriate for this spot/forum.

    I believe that the trial version has no time limit but rather limits how many tracks it will process. Contact the developer to confirm.
    Regards.

  • Missing column in query results CF9

    I've got a very simple table in mssql 2005 consisting of these columns:
    id (pk int),
    app_id (int),
    name (varchar50),
    dir_key (varchar50),
    path (varchar100),
    size_limit (smallint),
    ext_limit (varchar50),
    virtual_dir (varchar50)
    My query, run via cfquery or as a query object in script:
    SELECT * FROM dbo.tblAppUploadSettings WHERE app_id = 1
    Now, when that query runs, column virtual_dir is missing in the result set. It is present when running the same query via sql management studio.
    If I explicitly add virtual_dir to the select list ( *,virtual_dir ) then I get the column returned twice.
    I've made sure to clear query cache, etc. but to no avail.
    Any thoughts?

    vectorpj wrote:
    I've made sure to clear query cache, etc. but to no avail.
    Which 'query cache' did you clear?
    vectorpj wrote:
    Any thoughts?
    DO NOT USE
    SELECT *
    When you do, the database driver will cache the table structure the first time it is executed, and from then on it will not see any changes made to the table in the database, until such a time as this 'cache' is cleared.  And the only way, AFAIK, to do this is to restart services and|or servers.  This can lead to a whole host of hard to debug issues, such as the one you are experiencing.

  • Missing topics in printed documentation

    I am using RoboHelp V7 and WebHelp as my Primary Layout. My project has approximately 100 topics.
    The project is basically an A-Z with various topics saved into 26 folders (A-Z). The printed documentation prints perfectly except that the H1 headings for all the 'A' topics are missing from the resulting Word document.
    The table of contents in the Word document is correct, with "A" listed but none of the topics are listed in the TOC. The topics appear in their correction location in the word document except the H1 headings is missing. The heading "A" appears in the correct location in the Word document.
    In each topic the H1 is in the header and draws its text from the name of the topic.
    All the 'A' topics were created manually and the rest 'B-Z' were imported from an Word Document. This appears to be the only difference between the topics!!
    All the topics (A-Z) are connected to the same template and access the same CSS file.
    On the final screen of the Print Documentation Wizard (Print Document Appearance - Pninted Documentation) I have tried connecting to different templates from the drop down list under MS Word Template. I have also created my own *.dot file out of a resulting document (i.e. stripping all the text and saving as *.dot). But no luck.
    Any thoughts?
    Many thanks in anticipation.

    The HMTL for the two types of pages looks identical
    An 'A' page
    <div placeholder id=header style="width: 100%; position: relative;">
    <h1><variable name=title x-format=default x-value="Air conditioning">Air conditioning</variable></h1>
    </div>
    A 'D' page
    <div placeholder id=header style="width: 100%; position: relative;">
    <h1><variable name=title x-format=default x-value="dress code">dress code</variable></h1>
    </div>
    The only obvious difference in the HTML for the two types of pages is that the pages imported from Word have the following line in their metadata:
    <meta name=OriginalFile content="Orientation Guide - Draft Wording_V2.doc">
    And both types of pages are clearly connected to the same style sheets.
    Stumped? 

Maybe you are looking for