ReentrantLock is missing wake signals resulting in a deadlock

We are hitting an issue with ReentrantLock where it is missing the awake signal resulting in a deadlock. Here is the thread dump for the same. As you can see, Thread-55 is blocked on acquiring the lock, which is not locked by any other thread. This issue is very similar to
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6822370 which happens in Sunspot JVM.
"Thread-55" id=143 idx=0x2a4 tid=9388 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
-- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock$NonfairSync@0x00000001A21AC9A8
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.parkAndCheckInterrupt(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:811)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.doAcquireInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:867)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.acquireInterruptibly(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1201)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/ReentrantLock.lockInterruptibly(ReentrantLock.java:312)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:396)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ExecutorCompletionService.take(ExecutorCompletionService.java:164)[inlined]
at com/teneo/esa/common/textengine/expander/StemIndexManager.isStemPresent(StemIndexManager.java:1345)[optimized]
at com/teneo/esa/common/textengine/expander/StemIndexManager.buildStemIndex(StemIndexManager.java:425)[optimized]
at com/teneo/esa/common/textengine/expander/StemIndexManager.buildStemIndex(StemIndexManager.java:825)
at com/teneo/esa/analytics/stemindex/StemIndexAnalyticsImpl.process(StemIndexAnalyticsImpl.java:155)
at com/teneo/esa/analytics/stemindex/StemIndexAnalyticsService$1.run(StemIndexAnalyticsService.java:128)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace
"pool-7-thread-1" id=170 idx=0x310 tid=5524 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
-- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace
"pool-7-thread-2" id=171 idx=0x314 tid=15588 prio=
2012-10-04 13:18:37,908 INFO [STDOUT] (RMI TCP Connection(1465)-10.65.59.167:) 5 alive, parked, native_blocked
-- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace
"pool-7-thread-3" id=172 idx=0x318 tid=6056 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
-- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace
"pool-7-thread-4" id=173 idx=0x31c tid=6312 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
-- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace
"pool-7-thread-5" id=174 idx=0x320 tid=15132 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
-- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace
"pool-7-thread-6" id=175 idx=0x324 tid=10636 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
-- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V
2012-10-04 13:18:37,908 INFO [STDOUT] (RMI TCP Connection(1465)-10.65.59.167:) (Native Method)
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace
"pool-7-thread-7" id=176 idx=0x328 tid=17820 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
-- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace
"pool-7-thread-8" id=177 idx=0x32c tid=6516 prio=5 alive, parked, native_blocked
-- Parking to wait for: java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@0x00000001D2094E90
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park0(J)V(Native Method)
at jrockit/vm/Locks.park(Locks.java:2230)[inlined]
at jrockit/proxy/sun/misc/Unsafe.park(Unsafe.java:616)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:156)[inlined]
at java/util/concurrent/locks/AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1987)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:399)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:947)[optimized]
at java/util/concurrent/ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:907)
at java/lang/Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(JJJJJ)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace
Environment:
VM Version: Jrockit R28.2.3
JDK: 1.6.0_31
OS: Windows 2008
Let me know if you need any details.
Thanks,
Snehal
Edited by: 957943 on Oct 4, 2012 11:38 AM

Hi,
Open a ticket with support to file a BUG with JVM team.
Or try to upgrade your JVM to avoid this issue.
Regards,
Kal

Similar Messages

  • UCM 11g File missing from search result although file is accessable

    When I do search without any criteria in UCM 11g, some files missing from search result although I know the files were checked into UCM already since I'm able to see these files using url similar to:
    http://ucm/cs/idcplg?idcService=GET_FILE&dID=12345
    or use following url to get document information:
    http://ucm/cs/idcplg?idcService=DOC_INFO&dID=12345
    the file is not in the search resule even search by ID.
    also, the seach result say "displaying 1-20" but only display few files (e.g. 2 files, less than 20)
    Is this a known problem? the same search was working in UCM 10 perfectly.
    Thanks

    The query seems able to retrieve the missing document. for example, I search by content ID, in the audit log (eanbled as you mentioned) give th efollowing information:
    fusionappsattachments/6     09.13 06:22:03.878     IdcServer-3474     --- @ResultSet SearchResults ---
    fusionappsattachments/6     09.13 06:22:03.878     IdcServer-3474     numFields=66,*numRows=1*,currentRow=0
    also, the infomation following above give the deteail field information which match with the missing document.
    I looks like UCM just did not bring it to UI as part of search result.
    This seems match with my another finding as I mentioned earlier: the seach result say "displaying 1-20" but only display few files (e.g. 2 files, less than 20)
    it seems query did find the documents but UI did not show it.
    Not sure if this is a known bug.

  • For all entries : lines are missing in the results

    Hi all,
    I have a problem with my abap code.
    some lines are missing in the results.
    I have check the note 65554 but i use the version 6.40
    TYPES: BEGIN OF wys_bseg,
             bukrs TYPE bsad-bukrs,
             belnr TYPE bsad-belnr,
             gjahr TYPE bsad-gjahr,
             augbl TYPE bseg-augbl,
             augdt type bseg-augdt,
             hkont TYPE bseg-hkont,
             WRBTR type bseg-WRBTR,
             KOART type bseg-KOART,
             SHKZG type bseg-SHKZG,
           END OF wys_bseg.
    TYPES: begin of wys_bsas,
             bukrs TYPE bsas-bukrs,
             hkont TYPE bsas-hkont,
             augbl TYPE bsas-augbl,
             augdt type bseg-augdt,
             gjahr TYPE bsas-gjahr,
             belnr TYPE bsas-belnr,
             waers TYPE bsas-waers,
             blart TYPE bsas-blart,
             gsber TYPE bsas-gsber,
             dmbtr TYPE bsas-dmbtr,
             xblnr TYPE bsas-xblnr,
             SHKZG type bseg-SHKZG,
             zmntfact TYPE bsas-WRBTR,
           end of wys_bsas.
    DATA: wt_bseg_tmp TYPE wys_bseg OCCURS 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA : wt_bsas type wys_bsas occurs 0 WITH HEADER LINE.
        sort wt_bsas by bukrs belnr gjahr.
        DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM wt_bsas COMPARING bukrs belnr gjahr.
    IF NOT wt_bsas[] IS INITIAL.
        select bukrs belnr gjahr augbl augdt hkont WRBTR KOART SHKZG from
    bseg into table wt_bseg_tmp
                  for all entries in wt_bsas
                  where bukrs EQ wt_bsas-bukrs
                    and belnr EQ wt_bsas-belnr
                    and gjahr EQ wt_bsas-gjahr
                    and koart EQ 'D'.
    ENDIF.

    Hi
    Yes Arun is right, INTO TABLE option delete automatically the duplicates lines, so you make sure to insert all keys in order to load all record.
    Insert the field BUZEI in the structure of internal table:
    TYPES: BEGIN OF wys_bseg,
             bukrs TYPE bsad-bukrs,
             belnr TYPE bsad-belnr,
             gjahr TYPE bsad-gjahr,
             buzei type bseg-buzei, <------ New field
             augbl TYPE bseg-augbl,
             augdt type bseg-augdt,
             hkont TYPE bseg-hkont,
             WRBTR type bseg-WRBTR,
             KOART type bseg-KOART,
             SHKZG type bseg-SHKZG,
           END OF wys_bseg.
    Max

  • Programmatically creating a Rendezvous : missing variable in Result container

    Hi everybody,
    For my tests purpose, I need to programmatically create a sequence. In this sequence, I need to insert Rendezvous steps.
    Everything works fine when creating them, but when I execute the sequence / steps created this error always show up for rendezvous step : 
    Unknown variable 'TimeoutOccured' ; Error accessing item 'Result.TimeoutOccured'
    According to the TS help, this variable should be created when I configure the step for the rendezvous operation. Drag and dropping the step from the TS insertion palette works fine, and the variable is created when chosing the operation 'rendezvous'. But when doing the same thing through programmation, the variable is not created.
    Here are the steps executed to create the RDV step :
    I create a new step using method Engine.NewStep
    I set the step name using Step.Name
    I set the rendezvous properties using a statement (Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep is the variable holding the the step reference) :
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.Operation = 1, //A value that specifies the operation for the step to perform. The valid values are 0 = Create, 1 = Rendezvous, and 2 = Get Status
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.NameOrRefExpr = Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RefName, //Contains the Rendezvous Name expression for the Create operation and the Rendezvous Name or Reference expression for all other Rendezvous operations
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.TimeoutEnabled = False, //The Timeout Enabled setting for the Rendezvous operation
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.ErrorOnTimeout = True, //The Timeout Causes Run-Time Error setting for the Rendezvous operation
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.RendezvousCountExpr = Parameters.NbBranches, //The Number of Threads Per Rendezvous expression for the Create operation
    Parameters.BranchesRendezVous.RDVStep.AsStep.Lifetime = 3, //A value that specifies the Lifetime setting to use for the Create operation. The valid values are 0 = Same as Sequence, 1 = Same as Thread, 2 = Use Object Reference, and 3 = Same as Execution
    4. Then I insert the step in my current sequence using method Sequence.InsertStep
    Everything works fine, the rendezvous step is perfectly created and all properties are set finely. However, the variable TimeouOccured is missing in the Step.Result container (TS help says that this propoerty exists when the step is configured as a rendezvous operation (cf. Operation = 1)).
    Am I doing something wrong somewhere ? Why is this variable missing ?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Hi Doug,
    TS help says that this property exists when the step is configured as a rendezvous operation (cf. Operation = 1)... So shouldn't it be created when I create / insert the step ?
    I find it very weired to add a subproperty to a StepType, in the Result container...

  • When i click on itunes to open, message says: the registry settings used by the itune drivers for importing and burning cds and dvds are missing. this can result from installing other cd burning software. Reinstall itunes.  I'm inexperienced. Please help

    When I click on itunes, I get a message that says, "the registry settings used by the itune drivers for importing and burning cds and dvds are missing.  this can result from installing other cd burning software.  Reinstall itunes."  I am a really inexperienced computer user. My computer is a windows 7.  Would someone please walk me through this or tell me where to find information on how to do this. Thanking in advance, Laurie

    Check out this Apple article -> iTunes for Windows: "Registry settings" warning when opening iTunes
    The article will walk you through reinstalling iTunes and then checking for or creating device filters. Did it help? Did you run into any problems?

  • Image missing from Search results

    When my search results come up, in the top left corner of the
    results is a red x indicating a missing image. Checking the
    properties of this image, it is a 28 x 30 pixel image. Address just
    shows
    http://robohelp/Robo/BIN/ (our
    intranet site is
    http://robohelp). What is this missing
    image? and how can I make it appear (or delete).
    Also strange thing happened this morning where clicking on
    the search button brought up all the main navigation buttons again
    where the search results should appear and also search field did
    not work at all. I closed browser and started new session and all
    is well now, but RoboHelp does some strange stuff sometimes.
    Thanks.

    try to perform the below steps and check if it works or else we need to wait till Exchange 2013 SP1 which they have planned to bring digital signature message in exchange
    Outlook 2007
    In Outlook 2007, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
    In Outlook, click Tools, Instant Search, and then click
    Instant Search.
    When the Microsoft Office Outlook dialog appears, you should see the following:
    Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
    New items are indexed when they arrive.
    0 items remaining in "Mailbox -<<var>username</var>>"
    0 items remaining across all open mailboxes.
    Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013
    In Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
    In Outlook, click in the Search box.
    Click the Search tab, click Search Tools, and then click
    Indexing Status.
    When the Indexing Status dialog appears, you should see the following:
    Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
    0 items remaining to be indexed.
    Exchange Queries

  • Windows 8 - Folder Redirection policy missing from GP Results.

    Hi guys! This has been giving me a hard time the last day or so.  I've got some Win8 machines in our 2003 domain. I've got some GPO's applying with WMI filtering for win8 machines. Mostly these are ok, but i'm having a huge problem with Desktop Folder
    Redirection. 
    After a fresh build and first login, everything works fine. Drive mappings are all there and the Desktop is redirected to to users home drive on the file server. This is being done with Advanced settings using group membership and set to "Create a folder
    for each user under the root path" \\dfs1\users. This location is correct and permissions are fine of course as everything works for a while.
    After a little while or some unknown event, this redirection stops working.
    check these two screengrabs. These are different users on different machines. The machines are identical, are in the same OU and have the same image. The users are different but have the same group memberships and are in the same OU. 
    This is a working machine. Not the Folder Redirection component was processed and the Policy exists.
    This machine is not working. Folder Redirection is processed, but the Policy is missing. Running a gpresult /v on this machine yields: 
     Folder Redirection
         N/A
    It was working fine yesterday and this morning. Now at some point a policy refresh stopped it from working. Just trying to figure out what! These are the exact settings currently in place for our win 7 machines which all work just fine. Going a bit crazy
    tbh and usually when i post questions i figure it out shortly afterwards anyway huhu. Any help is appreciated! 

    well I though this issue was gone when I switched to a new Task Sequence in SCCM every machine that was built with that was working fine with Folder Redirection happening as it's meant to be. That was for about a week, now it's back to not working.
    here's a snippet of the gpsvc.log file pertaining to FD.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOs(User): Processing extension Folder Redirection
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ReadStatus: Read Extension's Previous status successfully.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CompareGPOLists: The lists are the same.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CompareGPOLists: The lists are the same.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 GPLockPolicySection: Sid = S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230, dwTimeout = 30000, dwFlags = 0x0
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CGPApplicationService::LockPolicySection.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Beginning WaitForSingleObject.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Completed WaitForSingleObject.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CPolicyCriticalSectionCollection: LockPolicySection called for user <S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230>
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 SID = S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 bMachine = 0
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 Global Sync Lock Called
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 Writer Lock got immediately.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 Global Lock taken successfully
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: Entering for extension Folder Redirection
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 UserPolicyCallback: Setting status UI to Applying Folder Redirection policy...
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: No changes. CSE will not be passed in the IwbemServices intf ptr
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 CGroupPolicySession::QueueItemForPolicyApplication::-- (Status: 997)
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 CGPApplicationService::UserLogonEvent::-- (Status: 997)
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: Extension Folder Redirection returned 0x0.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 ProcessGPOList: Extension Folder Redirection status was not updated because there was no changes and no transition or rsop wasn't enabled
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CGPApplicationService::UnLockPolicySection.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Beginning WaitForSingleObject.
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 WaitForServiceInitialization: Completed WaitForSingleObject.
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 Setting GPsession state = 1
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 User SID = <S-1-5-21-2272506071-1675830810-3538462175-3230>
    GPSVC(43c.11f4) 08:59:47:231 CPolicyCriticalSectionCollection: UnLocked successfully
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 CGroupPolicySession::QueueItemForPolicyApplication::++ (bTriggered: 0, bConsole: 1)
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 PolicyApplicationState is True.
    GPSVC(43c.5d0) 08:59:47:231 AsyncThreadsProcessing is False.

  • Acrobat 8 Slow Encoding from Word, Missing Text in Result!

    I am getting so frustrated with Acrobat 8.x.. not only do I have to put up with the 90-second hang after launching ANY PDF doc, but when I author docs out of Word and Quark, many times it takes ten minutes or more to export a 1-page doc and 40% of the text is MISSING! In other words, after waiting what seems an exhorbitant amount of time for a Word doc to export, I can't even use the PDF I exported because nearly half the text is missing. I'm exporting a single page price list in a basic table format. I've done this scores of times under Acrobat 7.x and it never took more than a couple of seconds and ALWAYS was WYSIWYG. Acrobat 8.x is just hopelessly broken. I've never had these problems with 7.x and earlier.
    Unless there is a quick fix, my question is can I install the older Acrobat 7 and uninstall the Acrobat 8 that is part of CS3 and have 7.x work like it did for me in the past?

    QuarkXpress and Word 2003 are the two apps I make PDFs from the most often. And Acrobat is version 8.1.
    Win XP Pro SP2, 3.5GHz quad core with 4GB RAM, BTW.
    PDF maker icons appear in all applications that can export a doc, and it is definately Adobe Distiller that is running when I click the "make PDF" icon in Word.
    I found a workaround--rebooting and making the PDF first thing before I do anything else. Apparently, this version needs all the resources of a freshly-booted XP in order to work properly. After an hour of use, Acrobat breaks down again and slows to a crawl, makes incomplete documents again. Just have to completely restart anytime I make a PDF--or revert to Acrobat 7 for fully-functional PDF maker that works any time of the day or nite.

  • Signed messages are missing from search results in a shared mailbox

    We recently completed moving all user mailboxes to Exchange 2013 from Exchange 2010.  We also have a policy that disables the 'download shared mailboxes' option in Outlook as it cause .ost files to get cumbersome and cause performance problems.  This
    means that shared mailboxes that users have open are all in 'Online' mode.  Since the move to 2013, when users search against a folder in a shared mailbox, the only items that are returned are unsigned messages.  Our customer base very frequently
    signs email and these signed messages do not show up in results.  This was working in Exchange 2010 so our users are frustrated by the sudden inability to receive complete and accurate search results.
    If they perform a search of their local mailbox, which is using Cached mode, they are searching against their local index and they can find signed messages.  But since the shared mailbox is not cached to their local system, they are relying on the Exchange
    server index and it does not seem to be indexing any signed messages.
    Does anyone know how to force Exchange 2013 to index signed messages?

    try to perform the below steps and check if it works or else we need to wait till Exchange 2013 SP1 which they have planned to bring digital signature message in exchange
    Outlook 2007
    In Outlook 2007, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
    In Outlook, click Tools, Instant Search, and then click
    Instant Search.
    When the Microsoft Office Outlook dialog appears, you should see the following:
    Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
    New items are indexed when they arrive.
    0 items remaining in "Mailbox -<<var>username</var>>"
    0 items remaining across all open mailboxes.
    Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013
    In Outlook 2010 and Outlook 2013, follow these steps to verify that indexing is complete:
    In Outlook, click in the Search box.
    Click the Search tab, click Search Tools, and then click
    Indexing Status.
    When the Indexing Status dialog appears, you should see the following:
    Outlook has finished indexing all of your items.
    0 items remaining to be indexed.
    Exchange Queries

  • DAQ Card is inducing noise on an external clock signal resulting in false triggering

    I am using an optical encoder as an external clock source for analog measurements with a PCI 6036 card.  The optical encoder signal is "filtered" using a Schmitt Trigger circuit and proper shielding practices are used on the encoder cable.  I am using a recent version of Labview.
    When the TTL square wave signal from the encoder is viewed on an oscilliscope (without the DAQ attached) it is a picture perfect square wave, nothing that would cause any problems.
    When I then connect the encoder output to my PFI line (with or without the oscilliscope) I get false triggering due to intermittent (seemingly random...) high frequency noise "blips".  Out of 360 expected samples, I will typically get between 2 and 6 "bonus" samples...  When captured on a scope, the noise looks like a decaying sine wave and lasts for only a few us.  the peak magnitude is tyically around 2 V or so as shown on the scope, which is apparently just enough to make my card grab a sample.
    Since the noise is only present when the encoder signal is attached to the DAQ, it seems that the DAQ is somehow inducing noise into the signal.
    I have been fighting this problem for a while now and tried the following:
    1)  I first tried the raw encoder signal, but then added the Schmitt trigger, increased the signal strength of the encoder lines by adding resistors to ground, double checked my shielding, etc...
    2) I verified that my ground potential between my card and my conditioning circuit were not causing problems.  The conditioning circuit and encoder is now powered of the card itself, which should resolve any possible problem with grounds.
    3) Cursed at various inanimate objects (made me feel better but didn't help the situation)
    4) Checked if I could set a minimum pulse width required to trigger off of an exernal scan clock (I can't with my hardware.)
    5) Swapped my card with a card of a different type (problem is still there)
    If anybody out there has some recomendations, I am open to anything.

    Hello OSU_Mech_Eng,
    I'm not quite sure how the DAQ card could be inducing glitches into
    your digital signal.  Digital signals from mechanical devices like
    quadrature encoders can often be glitchy or bouncy, but your schmitt
    trigger should act as a debouncing filter to clean up that digital
    signal.  It sounds like you have thoroughly troubleshooted this
    problem, and I would recommend moving on and trying to use a counter on
    your DAQ board to generate the digital signal, rathar than using the
    raw signal from your encoder/schmitt trigger.
    You were correct when you stated that the best way to do this is by
    configuring your counter to perform retriggerable pulse
    generation.  You can use the signal of from your encoder to gate
    the internal clock on your DAQ card, creating a clean digital
    signal.  By setting the minimum pulse width of the signal, you
    will be able to ignore the small glitches in your signal. Here is
    a link to some Knowledgebases describing how to do this:
    How Do I Remove Glitches or Add a Debounce Filter to My Digital Signal?
    How Do I Define the Parameters for Pulse Generation in NI-DAQmx?
    For further reference, on all of NI's new M-Series DAQ cards (PCI
    625x), the PFI circuitry contains built in debouncing filters to
    protect against small glitches in digital signals.  If you have an
    M-Series card lying around, it might be helpful to give that a try.
    I hope this helps,
    Travis Gorkin
    Applications Engineering
    National Instruments
    www.ni.com/support

  • The missed call signal is repeated

    My iPhone is to remind every minute myself that i missed a call or sms. Is it possible?

    No i dont think there is a way, i know you can make it so text message notifications can be repeated but i dont think missed call notifications can.

  • /610 is missing in pay result

    why our /610 is showing up last month but hasn't come up this month? We always have it and it was working fine until this month. Could anyone give me some clue? Thank you.

    Basically the ENDDA for 0209 for th employee and also, the validity of that Tax authority in the system.
    Sisnce the only reason of these wagetypes related to taxes to not to show up is the date ranges.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • Missing column in query results CF9

    I've got a very simple table in mssql 2005 consisting of these columns:
    id (pk int),
    app_id (int),
    name (varchar50),
    dir_key (varchar50),
    path (varchar100),
    size_limit (smallint),
    ext_limit (varchar50),
    virtual_dir (varchar50)
    My query, run via cfquery or as a query object in script:
    SELECT * FROM dbo.tblAppUploadSettings WHERE app_id = 1
    Now, when that query runs, column virtual_dir is missing in the result set. It is present when running the same query via sql management studio.
    If I explicitly add virtual_dir to the select list ( *,virtual_dir ) then I get the column returned twice.
    I've made sure to clear query cache, etc. but to no avail.
    Any thoughts?

    vectorpj wrote:
    I've made sure to clear query cache, etc. but to no avail.
    Which 'query cache' did you clear?
    vectorpj wrote:
    Any thoughts?
    DO NOT USE
    SELECT *
    When you do, the database driver will cache the table structure the first time it is executed, and from then on it will not see any changes made to the table in the database, until such a time as this 'cache' is cleared.  And the only way, AFAIK, to do this is to restart services and|or servers.  This can lead to a whole host of hard to debug issues, such as the one you are experiencing.

  • Signal icons for available networks on wifi tab are missing :(

    ive been having this problem since i upgraded to mountain lion.. the signal icons for available networks on wifi tab are missing..i do not have any problem with my connection but it would be better to see signal status before i connect to any available network....this is what it looks like...

    i did that many times but its still not working . its only for the icon on the menu bar which i have...i'm missing those signal icons beside the lock icons when im trying to search for available networks. ..if you could notice the above photo, i encircled it..the lock icon is usually accompanied by a status signal icon but its now gone....

  • External monitor won't wake up

    I've just installed 10.5.8, and can no longer wake up my external monitor from sleep with the clamshell closed by pressing a key on my external keyboard, meaning that I now have to have the clamshell open (and macbook display active) when I want to use my external screen. I installed 10.5.8 specifically to solve the sleep issue that many users have been experiencing. Does anyone have any advice? Thanks.

    I have the new 15" Retina MacBook Pro connected to a Thunderbolt display using one of the TB ports. Earlier today, I discovered that I could connect a second older 24" Dell Monitor (2405FPW) I've been using for years by using the DisplayPort to DVI adapter I had on my old iMac, and plugging the Dell directly into the second Thunderbolt port on the MBP.  All was well, until the displays went to sleep (I have my laptop configured to not sleep for 3 hours, but have the displays sleep after about 15 minutes).  When I came back, moving the mouse and typing on the keyboard brought the Thunderbolt Display back to life, but the Dell monitor remained dark.  Pressing buttons on the Dell had the message "In Power Save Mode - press key on the keyboard" appear.  I tried turning the monitor off, back on, unplugging the DVI cable from the MBP, all sorts of things.  It just would not wake up.  When going to the System Preferences, the dell WAS recognized.  As I plugged and unplugged the DVI cable from the second TB port, the "Arrangement" tab would appear and go away.  So, it SEEMED like it was working.
    Final solution for me: I selected "Sleep" from the Apple menu to actually put the entire machine to sleep.  I then jiggled the mouse, and the machine woke up, along with BOTH monitors!
    So, it appears that if just the monitors go to sleep, the "wake" signal is not making it to the Dell.  If the ENTIRE MACHINE sleeps, they all wake together.
    Hope that helps someone.  I couldn't find an answer, so I found it trial-and-error.

Maybe you are looking for