64 bit itanium support

Is tangosol supported for the 64-bit JVM (Sun JDK 1.4.2_05) on an Itanium box running Windows 2003. Is there a 64-bit version of tangosol that I need to download?

Hi,
As far as Coherence is concerned, the entire product is compiled to Java bytecodes, which are defined the same on every platform (i.e., no native code). We have run Coherence on most of the enterprise platforms out there, all the way up to 64-bit UNIX platforms and Z/OS mainframes.
The behavior of the JVM is clearly specified on both 32- and 64-bit platforms (including the Java memory model). It is unlikely that there is a significant implementation bug in the Itanium-specific JVM, so the most likely explanation is that there is a configuration issue in the build or runtime environments -- perhaps a file security setting, or some type of OS lockdown (port blocking, perhaps).
Have you tried running Coherence standalone (without your application), i.e. using bin/coherence.cmd? If that doesn't work, can you take a simple "hello world" application from your development environment and successfully run it in the Itanium environment?
Jon Purdy
Tangosol, Inc.

Similar Messages

Is 11.1.2.1 (32 bit) not supported for windows xp professional (SP2)

Is 11.1.2.1 (32 bit) not supported for windows xp professional (SP2).
Edited by: 867760 on Aug 18, 2011 3:36 PM

No, it is not supported as a server.
Please refer: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/bi-foundation/oracle-hyperion-epm-system-certific-131801.xls for supported versions.
HTH-
Jasmine.

Windows Server 2008 Standard 64 bit edt support Hyper-v replication

Dear Team.
Windows Server 2008 Standard 64 bit edt support Hyper-v replication or not.
If my primary physical server down so my secondary server act as primary server.

Hi,
Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V do not Support Hyper-V replica.
This is a new Feature in Hyper-V for Windows Server 2012.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831410.aspx#BKMK_Replica
Regards
Sebastian

I recently upgraded to Mavericks from Snow Leopard. Does Snow Leopard still exist on my Mac? If so, is it possible to restart under Snow Leopard in order to run PowerPC apps? If not, is there an OS available in 64 bit that supports PowerPC apps? Mav ***.

I recently upgraded to Mavericks from Snow Leopard. Does Snow Leopard still exist on my Mac? If so, is it possible to restart under Snow Leopard in order to run PowerPC apps? If not, is there an OS available in 64 bit that supports PowerPC apps? Mav ***.

The only reason I upgraded to Mavericks was because my Snow Leopard OS was 32 bit, which I was told would support only 4GB of RAM.
That wasn't quite right. You can put in as much RAM as your Mac's hardware supports. The division is in the apps themselves. A 32 bit app can't use more than 4 GB or RAM. A 64 bit app can use much more.
For example, as a 32 bit only version, Photoshop CS3 can't use more 4GB of RAM, no matter how much you actually have installed. CS4 or later can use all the RAM you want to throw at it.

HT1846 which edition of windows 32 or 64 bit are supported by macbook pro late 2011

which edition of windows (32 or 64 bit) are supported by macbook pro late 2011

I would go so far as to say there is no reason or need for there to even be 32-bit version.
64-bit has better memory and graphic handling with whatever you have.
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_ss_c_1_16?url=search-alias%3Dsoftware&field-ke ywords=windows+7+system+builder&sprefix=windows+7+system%2Caps%2C201

8-bit vs 10-bit monitor support?

Okay, I keep seeing in a photography forum that Mac is lagging behind PCs because it still uses 8-bit monitor support and Windows has 10-bit monitor support. I would really love to know from one the the experts in this forum: Is this a true fact, or just hype? Just what is the real difference is between 8- and 10-bit monitor support? Is Apple working on offering 10-bit support, and if so when?

10bit monitor display from Mac Pro late 2013
Can I use "deep color" (10-bit each color) on actual mac-mini?

ATA PCI card with 48 bit BIOS support?

Hello,
I have an iMac G3 CRT purchased at the very end of 2001 (last of this model.) I am about to install a new hard drive. I am replacing an 80GB with a 160GB Maxtor (because they were the same price!) The drive box says that drives larger than 137GB require a Mac-compatible ATA PCI card with 48 bit BIOS support. Do I already have this? Is this part of the mother board? If not I will exchange the drive for a smaller one.
Thanks.
iMac G3 CRT Mac OS 9.2.x

I forgot to mention something. Firewire cases can allow you to make use of a larger drive though. So you could keep your internal and put the new drive in a firewire case that supports large drives and get lots of extra space.

Portege M300 - How many bit are supported by LBA

Hello,
Does someone know how many bit are supported by LBA? Has it 48 bit?
I need to know if I can mount a 120GB Hdd against a 160GB for an important upgrade.
I can't find this information on toshiba site: are there changelog BIOS somewhere?
Thank you

Did you mean the general LBA specification or the ATA interface equipped in M300?
There are two different spec; 28bit and 48bit.
I think your M300 supports the original design specifications and it provides only 28bit logical block addressing.
Therefore in my opinion you will be not able to use bigger then 137GB HDDs

MSI GT70-0NC Notebook Windows 8 64-bit driver support?

Is there any MSI GT70-0NC Notebook Windows 8 64-bit driver support out yet?

Quote from: 3dfuzion on 25-August-12, 02:47:30
Still looking for the following driver, PC Simple Communications Controller? Any suggestions?
It's Intel Management Engine, but i don't see Win8 driver for it yet, so you have to wait for this.
Dunno if driver from win7 can works. But better don't try it as a mess can occur

Labview with Vista 64 bit native support

I'm waiting day after day to see a new Labview release supporting Vista 64 bit (I mean running at 64bit natively and not in a 32bit emulation layer). I expected it last year... then I waited believing that of course... it'll come soon... but now I'm really panicking.
64bit CPUs and Vista x64 are now available from a long time ! What's going on ?
Did I miss some release note ??? Maybe is already available and I don't know ? (I hope so!)
In the mean time Microsoft announced the discontinuation of Windows XP on June 2008 this year (3 moths from now)!!!
Does anyone knows when a full 64bit Labview version will be released ? And what about Vision libs ? (I also need full 64 bit Vision Libs for my applications...)
I have big memory allocation limits due to 32bit addressing (max 2GB) that I cannot afford anymore... not in the 2008.
I write Vision acquisition software using Labview, IMAQ Hardware and Advanced IMAQ Vision Libs.
As everybody know, memory allocation is "generally" limited to 2GB by the 32bits OS (little more with some tricks) but max image allocation in Labview is anyway much smaller because of default memory fragmentation (Labview and Vision LIBs require allocating a "contiguous memory block" and generally no more then 3-500MB are really available for a single image even with 4GB of memory installed in your PC! This is caused by all DLLs and processes running in memory at different addresses and fragmenting the memory).
I spoke several time with NI concering this problem in the last years and I was told to wait... in the mean time I had to write a special "memory defragmentation" tool myself in order to free up to 1.2GB of RAM for imaging with Labview. Not enough for me and anyway not a clean solution.
Then after Microsoft announced Vista 64bit (a few years ago now) and all PC manufacturer starting building 64bit architecture I expected to solve all my problems soon because of the much larger usable memory addressability...
but this cannot be done yet if Labview and Vision LIBs run in 32bit emulation only !!!
Furthermore Vista 32bit is much slower then XP and uses much more memory !!! This is really a nightmare as I believe that for the first time I'm facing the possibility that soon I'll have to deliver a "newer" but worst product to my customers.
In fact I'll be forced soon to move from LV 7/8 to LV 8.5 (just in order to support Vista) but only to be slower and having the same memory limitations (or maybe more).
Maybe I'm wrong ?
Can anyone reassure me... LV 9 is just after the corner with full 64bit as requested ??? I'm really in panick !
Thanks...
I'm really a LV lover but cannot wait anymore...

Dear Matt,
I was aware of the /3GB and I tryed time ago with LV 7 and XP but without being able to allocate a larger image anyway...
I'll try again and for sure 4GB under Vista 64 is better then anything !!! Do you know if "Image Create.vi" (a VI included in the Vision package) is also able to allocate up to 4GB ?
Concerning Memory defrag I started using some tools available in the marlet (there are good ones for memory analyzing but no one is capable of defragging the memory really)... then a coupple of years ago I wrote a small application in Labview based on 2 free tools provided on the web (those are free tools for developpers provided from Microsoft)...
One is Listdlls.exe which is a command line capable of listing all running DLLs (associated with any running application) and it produces a memory map of the DLLs allocation in memory which allow you to understand how memory is fragmented.
The other one is also a command line tool named Rebase.exe which allow you to a DLL to a different address in memory.
In fact once rebased a DLL will generally load automatically starting at the new address instead of loading in the middle of the memory or at the original address... but not always as some rare system DLLs will anyway try to load always at the same position (as for Asian Language Pack on Chinese/Japanese OS). Furthermore some DLLs need to be loaded to a specific address.
I wrote a program in order to automatically create a memory map of all running DLLs (including system ones) using Listdlls.exe and automatically rebasing them after the first 128MB in memory. Rebasing system/running DLLs is generally more difficult (because of the required access policy and because you must plan a replacement only after next reboot) ... my software take care of this.
Furthermore rebasing running/system DLLs is also dangerous and can crash your system... after many test I limited the rebasing to the memory addresses included between 256MB and 1.6GB... I never have problems rebasing all DLLs in these range (including system ones) under XP 32bit SP2.
I also move DLLs to free space only (not on already occupyed space). Furthermore I never allocate DLLs in the first 128MB (as you'll crash your system probably). In this way I was capable of freing a lot of memory (generally about 15-20 DLLs are reallocated and memory between is free between 300 and 1.6)... something more can be done manually on the higher memory addresses but it take times and must be checked always. In automatic mode my software is capable of freing memory in 2 seconds (but you need a reboot).
Backing up original DLLs is also suggested in order to be able to restore them in case of any problem. I implemented an automatic backup and a restore option for this. A manual mode allow me to manually move DLLs in memory (but it's more dangerous and never allow my customer to do it).
Generally after rebased the memory stay defragmented until you install a new OS patch (which replace old DLLs).
Then you must be aware then in order to mantain the memory clean when running your application in Labview you should preallocate a large memory block when starting your application preventing labview from allocating resources in your free memory (it must use memory outside the 300-1600MB range). This is another problem... I found it hard to solve and my application is doing a good job but not perfect for this.
p.s. Labview and LV Runtimes are major cause of memory fragmentation as they load just in the middle of the system memory... these are the first DLLs ro be rebased !!!

How to workaround the lack of 64 bit windows support of HWS

I have very long patterns in text format for a traditional semiconductor digital tester that I need to use in a NI HSDIO card. The HSDIO driver can only import files of HWS type. The Digital Waveform Editor only supports HWS to save patterns with more than two states. So if I want to convert my pattern to a binary type that supports more data states than 1 and 0, and load it using HSDIO, I have to use HWS. What am I supposed to do if I have 64 bit windows? I cannot mess with the PC I am using, and 64 bit is pretty standard nowadays.

Hi J_osh_o,
I saw that you were already being helped by one of our Applications Engineers on another post. Please keep to one post per question.
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Replacement-tool-for-Digital-Waveform-Editor-that-is-compatible/m-p/...
In case you are referencing this Knowledge Base article for this information. Please noet that the Title is incorrect, and that there should not be a problem using HWS files in Windows 64-bit but actually only LabVIEW 64-bit. We will be changing this title soon.
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/9A90CF836B86263686257998007D184D
Regards,
Kaitlin N.
National Instruments
Applications Engineer

Solaris 10 64 bit and 64 bit JVM support for Weblogic Server 9.1

Does the following configuration supported:
Weblogic Server 9.1
Sun Solaris 10 (64 bit)
Sun JVM 5.0 (64 bit)
I could only find reference to 32 bit JVM on bea site.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks

Hi.
answers inline:
sanjay wrote:
Hi,
Can Weblogic Express (Cluster edition)6.1J sp2 be installed on Sun Solaris(Sparc)
8(64 bit) ?Yes - http://edocs.bea.com/wls/platforms/index.html#solaris8
>
>
Can Weblogic Express (Cluster edition)6.1J sp2 JDBC driver be used for Oracle 8.1.7(Solaris
64 bit) ?
Yes - http://edocs.bea.com/wls/platforms/index.html#jdbc
Michael Young
Developer Relations Engineer
BEA Support

Reader 64 bit browser support

We would like to enable PDF file scanning from our graphing tool, but need Adobe to provide a 64 bit version of nppdf32.dll for browser support. We provide this scanning functionality from the 32 bit versions of Ansys Simplorer and Ansys Maxwell, but eliminate the PDF option for our 64 bit versions, because the CHtmlView we use won't load PDF files. The technical world is moving rapidly to 64 bits. Where is Adobe?

There is currently no 64-bit plugin available, but I have a strong feeling that it will be there in Reader 12.

Installing crystal 2008 on windows 2003 64 bit Itanium server

We just purchased crystal 2008. We want to install the crystal runtime on windows 2003 itanium 64bit.
After install. the reports give crystal run time error.

what about:-
https://edelivery.oracle.com/EPD/Download/get_form?egroup_aru_number=10880598
Oracle® Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Microsoft Windows (64-Bit) on Intel Itanium DVD (Part 1 of 5) B24898-01 Part 1 of 5 522M
Oracle® Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Microsoft Windows (64-Bit) on Intel Itanium DVD (Part 2 of 5) B24898-01 Part 2 of 5 566M
Oracle® Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Microsoft Windows (64-Bit) on Intel Itanium DVD (Part 3 of 5) B24898-01 Part 3 of 5 435M
Oracle® Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Microsoft Windows (64-Bit) on Intel Itanium DVD (Part 4 of 5) B24898-01 Part 4 of 5 595M
Oracle® Database 10g Release 2 (10.2.0.1.0) for Microsoft Windows (64-Bit) on Intel Itanium DVD (Part 5 of 5) B24898-01 Part 5 of 5 583M

No 64-bit vista support...? Starting to question my relationship with Apple

Apple still isn't fully supporting 64-bit vista, and there is no word as to if or when they will do so. Every time I open itunes I have to tolerate the "not correct installed" message and the inability to burn CDs.
I've spent thousands of dollars on ipods, music, and videos. I did so expecting that apple would support me as a customer. It has been months since vista was released, and at this point apple is just being negligent in their lack of support. This is a main-stream windows operating system here. It is entirely reasonable to expect support for it.
I'm starting to reconsider my relationship with Apple. I certainly won't be expanding my library any time soon. Not when they have the ability to hold me hostage by limiting their support. I'm tempted to cut and run. I'll take a big loss on my library, but there may be no other choice.
People have posted links to some 3rd party driver you can install to work around the problem... but I'm not looking for a work-around. I'm looking for reasonable support from a company which has taken a good deal of my cash.
Apple, please do the right thing and resolve this issue.

http://www.gearsoftware.com/support/drivers.cfm
these aren't 3rd party drivers that act as a workaround. these are necessary drivers to your computer that, for some reason, are absent from vista 64. because every other computer running vista 32 or xp has these drivers. i originally had 32 bit vista and had no issues with itunes. it was only until i got the 64bit version that i had any problems. but seriously, this is probably the only way you'll get around that issue. i don't see apple caring when they're spending all they're resources on releasing new ipods and iphones that have their own sets of problems.

64 bit itanium support

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for