9iAS Profiling tools

Does anyone know ofProfiling tools I can use for my Java programmers? Specifically, I am looking to view performance issues like I can against the Database.
Thanks

Did you look at the profilers availble as part of Oracle9i JDeveloper? You have 3 profilers there (event, memory and execution) plus a sqlplus explain plan capability.
There is a script that show you these as part of the JDeveloper reviewer guide.
http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev

Similar Messages

Known issue: Diagnostic tools - profiling tools fail to launch (Windows 10 Technical Preview SDK and tools, March 2015 release)

The following issues exist when you run the diagnostic tools without the debugger for Windows universal app projects (Debug >
Start Diagnostic Tools without Debugging):
When the startup project is a C++ universal app set to deploy to a physical Windows Phone device, the profiling tools fail to launch.

Workaround:
Using the Start debugging drop-down menu, change the target to Local Machine, Simulator, or Emulator.

Profiling Tool for Web AS

Hi,
which profiling tool would you recommend to be used for Web AS 6.4 based J2EE applications? Is the JDI shipped with one?
Thank you,
Heiko Nolte

Hi Heiko,
the "most official" supported tool is the so-called Sherlok (Doku: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sapportals.km.docs/documents/a1-8-4/sherlok 1.4 java application monitor reference guide.pdf; Download: https://www.sdn.sap.com/sdn/downloads.sdn?page=sherlok_download.htm). More general information to be found under https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sapportals.km.docs/documents/a1-8-4/how to analyze performance problems.pdf.
Nevertheless, JProbe is "somewhat" supported, look here: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sapportals.km.docs/documents/a1-8-4/how to start jprobe with web as java
Hope it helps
Detlev

Profiling tool for applets using Microsoft JVM?

Hello All,
I have an applet designed to work in Microsoft JVM. It is slow and sometimes crashes the browser and I doubted that it caused memory leak. Therefore, I wish to have a profiling tool which can collect time and memory consumption from Microsoft JVM.
Please advice.

simply: there is none.
Its even impossible to denug it withought a legal copy of J++, trust me MSJVM really sucks.
I have to create a really big applet which is compatible to Netscape-4.7 and MSJVM-3167+ and its nightmare. One change and the whole cardhouse breaks.
I do not want to make you feel sad, but leave it.
lg Clemens
PS: I would try to create as few objects a s possible, the ms-gc is not very powerful nore stable...

JVM performance profiling tool

Hello,
I wonder if there are any tools available out there for profiling a Java program running inside Oracle8i. A tool that measures in what methods execution time has been spent (how much time), how many instances of different objects have been created, heap size etc etc. I've been using OptimizeIt for standalone applications, but I don't know what to use for JServer inside 8i.
Help !!!
/Patrik

Have you looked at JDeveloper? It has a set of execution profile and memory profile tools. It also supports debugging in the database for both PL/SQL and Java stored procedures.

Free performance-profile tool ?

Hi Folks,
Might anyone know of a good and free performance profile tool ?
I am looking for something like Candle, Intrascope or Mercury 'Deep Diagnostics'.
I've just seen a list on http://www.javaperformancetuning.com/resources.shtml
anyone used these ?
thanks!
JM

"Marmelstein" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:40bd9e54$1@mktnews1...
I should add that I'm more interested in application-level stuff than the JVM.
The kind of thing I'd really like to see is (for example) lots of time is spent
in a particular ejb 'find' method.
Hi Folks,
Might anyone know of a good and free performance profile tool ?
I am looking for something like Candle, Intrascope or Mercury 'Deep Diagnostics'.
I've just seen a list on http://www.javaperformancetuning.com/resources.shtml
anyone used these ?
I'd get a commercial one. Usually such tools pay off after the first use.
Regards,
Slava Imeshev

Lens Profile Tool Addition – White Balance Offset Correction

I have noticed that my Canon 17-40mm and 70-200mm F4 IS lenses have virtually identical color temperature and can use the same white balance setting. My Sigma 50mm F2.8 Macro lens is another story, requiring almost 200K and +15 change to White Balance sliders. I am sure there are cases where Canon’s lenses will differ more widely and exhibit a similar degree of white balance differences, not to mention use of UV or 1B protection filters. An 85mm F1.2 lens using “rare earth” low dispersion glass, will have a warmer color temperature than a lens using more common glass elements.
I use the X-Rite ColorChecker Passport to create custom profiles for each of my camera bodies. I typically make separate correction presets for Daylight, Cloudy, and Tungsten (2700K). This requires changing the LR White Balance sliders to obtain “neutral gray in the ColorChecker image files shot in each of above described lighting conditions. It does not appear necessary to create a separate ColorChecker camera profile for each lens, just correction to the LR white balance slider settings.
I did some measurements of change in camera profile for Sunny Daylight (~5,500K), Cloudy (8,000K+), and Tungsten (~2,900K) lighting. There was no measurable change in rendering of the ColorChecker Passport images for the extreme Sunny to Cloudy conditions, and only very slight changewhen comparing the Tungsten profile. This was done by loading a ColorChecker Passport image file and applying alternate profiles:
EXAMPLE:
Open a DaylightColorChecker Passport image file in LR, apply Cloudy Camera Profile, and adjust White Balance for the gray scale patches using the Eyedropper Tool. Then look at the 'Before' and 'After' images....you will see NO visual change to any of the color patches. I saw only a very slight change when doing this with the Daylight to Tungsten (artificial light source) comparison.
The relatively small change in color balance between lenses (~500K max.) should have no measurable or visible affect to the ColorChecker Passport created "Camera Profile." The ColorChecker Passport or any other "Camera Profile" creation tool is first and foremost correcting for differences in the camera's image sensor color rendering.
SUGGESTION:
Since this white balance difference is a factor of the lens, it would be very convenient to add another tool in Lightroom's and Camera Raw Lens Profile panel for “White Balance Offset.” This allows setup of LR defaults for one specific lens type, such as your most used lens. Then you use the new ‘Lens Profile’ located ‘White Balance Offset’ correction tool to adjust white balance for all of your other lenses. In addition, Adobe or camera manufacturers could also provide the 'White Balance Offset Correction' as a function of the lens spectral response deviation from linear. This would provide a "uniform method" of calculating and adding the White Balance correction to the 'Lens Profile.' Since this is a factor of the lens only, the “lens offset correction” can be used with ANY lens/camera body pairing, The current LR and Camera Raw White Balance settings are then only used for “Global” correction of lighting conditions, and NOT for lens differences.
This is a linear mathematical function,which should be extremely easy for Adobe to add the ‘White Balance Offset’ correction feature to LR’s and Camera Raw's Lens Profile GUI. Just like many other tools in LR that some don't use, you can choose to use it or not!

Interesting suggestion. Thanks. -Simon

Profiling Tools for Jdeveloper

Hi all
Is there any tools that can be used for the purpose of profiling , code review for the JDeveloper IDE. Or does jdeveloper come inbuilt with such features.

CPU Profile and Memory profile in Run will help you
additional to that you can use jrocikit to do extensive profiling and lock, memory leaks etc

Kernel module profiling tools?

Are there any tools available to profile a kernel module?
I have a STREAMS module that does crypto stuff and it's performance is not up to what I would like. I'd like to see where it's spending it's time.
Or is the best I can do keep track of time myself with gethrestime()?

Hello,
Also, if you are on Solaris 8, you can use lockstat. Please check
the man page of lockstat(1M) for more information.
Hope this helps.
-- Gopinath
Sun - DTS

Memory profiling tools

I'm looking for a tool that will allow me to profile the memory usage of different classes in my Java applicaitons. I need to see how many instances of various classes exist and their memory usage.
Can anyone point me in the direction of some good tools that do this sort of thing?
Thanks.

There are lots of java profilers.
With java/5 you have jmx inside the jvm, it may help for some operations.
If you want more details you can try my free profiler, jmp, http://www.khelekore.org/jmp
but if you prefer to pay for it you can google for
jprofiler, optimizeit, jprobe
/robo

Oracle 9iAS administration tool with GUI??

Hello,
Has Oracle9iAS an administration tool with a GUI (web tool or similar...)??
I found some console commands to start/stop and deploy some EJB but it's too bored.
If this tool exists, please tell me how can I access to it.
Thanx in advance.
Byeee

In Oracle9iAS Release 2, V902, the web based EM tool provides the entier OC4J administration capabilities including application deployment.
Regards
Pavna Jain
Oracle9iAS Product Management

Weblogic Profiling tools

Hi
Has anybody used OptimizeIt with WebLogic for profiling? If so, has anyone
tried to use the Java HotSpot VM with OptimizeIt?
Thanks in advance
Sudhakar

Yes, we have successfully used OptimizeIt with Weblogic. However, it does
not support hotspot in java 1.3
We are very pleased with OptimizeIt. It has helped us a great deal.
"Sudhakar Durairaj" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3a01cbe8$[email protected]..
Hi
Has anybody used OptimizeIt with WebLogic for profiling? If so, hasanyone
tried to use the Java HotSpot VM with OptimizeIt?
Thanks in advance
Sudhakar

Option Profiler in "visualvm" tool not available under Linux ?

When starting Visualvm 1.0.1 under RedHat Linux
I get only the three following basics tools: overview monitor threads
it lacks : profiler
Is there any option to set to get the profiler tool?
( The same version works well under windows )

To get the profiler tab, monitored application must be running on JDK6. See VisualVM feature matrix at [https://visualvm.dev.java.net/features.html#feature_matrix]

Crash when starting a performance/memory profile

I'm having a catastrophic crash when I hit the 'Start' button in the Profile -> Performance and Memory... dialog. There is no error message whatsoever, and when I restart Labview, it only asks me about files to recover, it doesn't tell me where it crashed (i.e. somefile.cpp line ###). Well, it might have told me once, but now it doesn't, so unless there is a log of these things somewhere, I can't say much more.
I'm using Labview 2009, and I'm having the exact same issue on at least 2 machines which are fairly different (Win XP 32 bit vs Win7 64 bit (with Labview 32 bit)).
The application is pretty large (~1500 vi's), so it's kind of hard to tell what is making it crash.
The problem can be replicated in different ways:
1) Load main VI which loads all the VI's in memory
2) Start Performance/Memory profile *crash*
1) Load VI
2) Start VI (runs in a loop)
3) Start Performance/Memory profile while it runs *crash*
1) Start Performance/Memory profile
2) Some NI VI's show up in the list with '0' time everywhere
3) Load VI
4) Execute VI
5) Stop execution of VI *crash*
Any clues? Is there a log somewhere that could help me/you find the issue?
I could spend all day trying to load different parts of the project and look for problems, but I have no idea what to look for.
Last Friday I had successfully profiled what I wanted to, then I had another crash... Oh I remember now... I did a 'Search' in my project, looked for a particular string, and it crashed after a while in the middle of the search. Since then I was unable to use the profile tool. Could it be some data corruption? We use SourceSafe... so I wouldn't be surprised if it gave me a corrupted file If so, how could I find it?
Thank you

Hey Samapico,
I actually found an incident like yours involving the performance and memory tool crashing when used for specific VIs which were very large. How big (in terms of filesize) is your VI?
R&D found this issue in LV 2009 and fixed it in 2010 under Corrective Action Request 215410.
Is there any way you could try and test your issue out on a machine with LV 2010?
<Joel Khan | Applications Engineering | National Instruments | Rice University BSEE>

Lightroom Bug: with GoPro Hero4 Silver Lens Profile, crop settings do not sync properly in Lightroom 5.7.1 when Constrain To Warp is checked

I was having a bit of difficultly in getting crop settings to properly sync in Lightroom 5.7.1 (running on OS X 10.10.1) when Constrain to Warp was checked. This appears to be a bug in the latest version(s) of Lightroom that include(s) the GoPro Hero4 Silver Lens Profile settings. I'm working with a lot of files from a GoPro Hero4 Silver camera shot in the time-lapse / interval timer mode. All of them are horizontal with the same resolution (and dimensions). I've tried various sequences to get this to work in terms of using Auto-Sync, resetting the settings on all images except one and then copy and pasting settings, etc, though the crop is not properly syncing regardless of what I do.
Here's are instructions of how to duplicate this issue (there are some extra details/steps here, though this should be clear enough to produce the same result):
     1. in the Develop settings for a single selected image, go to Lens Corrections, click to Enable Profile Corrections (in the Profile tab), and then pick the GoPro Hero4 Silver Edition (Adobe Profile) if it is not automatically chosen for you (if you are using files from a Hero4 Silver camera). After this, click on the Manual tab, and set the Scale setting to 76. (as you will see, you now have the full horizontal width of the image that was getting cropped off, though you do see white around the edges that have been warped/shaped to correct the fisheye distortion)
     2. Press the R key (or click on the Crop Overlay tool just below the histogram). Change the Aspect option to Custom. Click to unlock the lock next to it (this seems to re-lock after setting to custom even if it was locked before). Place a checkmark next to the Constrain To Warp option. (At this point, you'll see the image gets cropped back to an approximately 4:3 ratio and the full horizontal width is not included in the cropped area) Click the upper right most corner of the crop area and drag as much to the right and top as it lets you go. Do the same for the lower left corner, dragging it as far to the bottom left as you can go. (Now, you will see that your cropped area is the maximum rectangular width and height you can select without getting any of the excessive white area) Click the Close button (or press R again) to leave the crop overlay tool.
     3. Press G to go back to the grid of images. Make sure the image you just adjusted the settings for is the only one selected. Right click on it, go to Develop Settings, and click Copy Settings. Click Check All on the window that appears and then click Copy.
     4. De-select the image you were working on. Select multiple other images in the grid. Right click on one of these, go to Develop Settings, and click Paste Settings. (at this point, you will see their aspect ratio has become more panoramic than the 4:3 aspect ratio the images previously were)
     5. De-select these images. Select one of these image, and then press D to go to the Develop settings for this image. Press R to go to the Crop Overlay tool. Here you will see the bug where the crop was not properly copied over from the first image. The selected area is smaller than the full width and height available to crop.
It seems that the bug is that Lightroom is only copying the aspect ratio (and the other settings), but not the actual crop selection.
I just thought of a workaround that I've tested and can confirm works (and will also work in a slightly different workflow than above). In step 1 above, for the Model (and Profile), manually pick the "GoPro Hero4 Black Edition" or the "GoPro Hero3-Silver Edition". If using the "Hero3-Silver" setting, the Scale (also in step 1 above) need only be set to 79 (rather than 76 for the Hero4 profiles). By picking one of these Lens Profiles and doing everything else the same as the other steps above, the crop settings do copy and paste properly. This does also appear to work properly when selecting the "GoPro Hero3-White Edition" Lens Profile, with a Scale setting of 75, which yields a slightly more rectilinear image (with a wider aspect ratio -- almost, but not quite 16:9).
While this isn't too big of deal as it does work by picking one of the other lens profiles (and the Hero4 Black Edition profile appears to make the same exact correction to the image), this was incredibly frustrating last night to notice that some files had the proper horizontal field of view / crop and others didn't, and other users may experience this or not even notice their crop is not copied properly (as, depending on one's composition and image, it's not extremely obvious with such a wide view).
I hope this discovery helps someone else and provides feedback for Adobe to correct this issue in the next version of Lightroom 5.
On a separate, additional note for Adobe: Please allow the crop overlay tool to "crop" an image to a size that is larger than the original dimensions of the image. This would allow for one to retain maximum original sharpness in the center of the image when using the Lens Profile tool to correct, or "de-fish" a lens, without having to scale the image down with the Scale option on the Manual tab of the Lens Corrections settings. For example, when I do the above process selecting the Hero3-White Edition profile, my final image dimensions are 3840 by 2257 pixels, reducing the size of the image in the center by 25%. If the tool allowed one to crop/scale a larger image size, and I kept the Scale option of the Lens Corrections settings at 100 rather than 75, my final image dimensions would be 5120 by 3009 pixels (larger than the 4000 by 3000 pixel dimensions of the original image which the tool now limits me to). Yes, the edges would be a little softer but the center would retain the original detail. (this is essentially what the Calculate Optimal Size button found in the Hugin open source software does, when using it on a single image for lens transformations/corrections)

Can you zip up a few of your GoPro images, upload them to dropbox.com and post a share link, here, so others can experiment with them, or do you mean this issue is global to all camera models?

9iAS Profiling tools

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for