A small clarification in Exception handling

Please find the simpe program given below on Exception handling I have asked my query at the end of the program
This program is about throwing a user defined exception when Command line arguments satisfieds one of the checked conditions. Thanks in advance:
class myexcep extends Exception
class exception
public static void main(String arg[])
try
for(j = arg.length-1;j>=0;j--)
checkfood(arg[j]);
catch(myexcep e1)
System.out.println("Exception " +e1);
System.out.println("I dont like this ifood");
e1.printStackTrace();
public static void checkfood(String a) throws myexcep
if (a.equals("Pizza") | a.equals("Brocolli") | a.equals("Pasta"))
throw new myexcep();
System.out.println("I like this food " +a);
The program complies and runs succesfully. After compilation if I give
c:> java exception cabbage Pizza sub
3rd and 2nd arguments are evaluated sucessfully and a exception is thrown, when argument "Pizza" is encountered which is succesfully caught by catch block. SO program ends there without even looking at my first argument cabbage.
Can anyone give me a suggestion as of how to evaluate String "cabbage".

Swtich the for and the try ... like this:
    for(int j = arg.length-1;j>=0;j--) {
      try {
        checkfood(arg[j]);
      } catch(myexcep e1) {
        System.out.println("Exception " +e1);
        System.out.println("I dont like this ifood");
        e1.printStackTrace();
    }

Similar Messages

PL/SQL 101 : Exception Handling

Frequently I see questions and issues around the use of Exception/Error Handling in PL/SQL. More often than not the issue comes from the questioners misunderstanding about how PL/SQL is constructed and executed, so I thought I'd write a small article covering the key concepts to give a clear picture of how it all hangs together. (Note: the examples are just showing examples of the exception handling structure, and should not be taken as truly valid code for ways of handling things)
Exception Handling
Contents
1. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 1)
2. Execution of the Execution Block
3. Exceptions
4. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 2)
5. How to continue exection of statements after an exception
6. User defined exceptions
7. Line number of exception
8. Exceptions within code within the exception block
1. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 1)
The first thing that one needs to understand is almost taking us back to the basics of PL/SQL... how a PL/SQL execution block is constructed.
Essentially an execution block is made of 3 sections...
+---------------------------+
| Declaration Section |
+---------------------------+
| Statements Section |
+---------------------------+
| Exception Section |
+---------------------------+
The Declaration section is the part defined between the PROCEDURE/FUNCTION header or the DECLARE keyword (for anonymous blocks) and the BEGIN keyword. (Optional section)
The Statements section is where your code goes and lies between the BEGIN keyword and the EXCEPTION keyword (or END keyword if there is no EXCEPTION section). (Mandatory section)
The Exception section is where any exception handling goes and lies between the EXCEPTION keyword at the END keyword. (Optional section)
Example of an anonymous block...
DECLARE
.. declarative statements go here ..
BEGIN
.. code statements go here ..
EXCEPTION
.. exception handlers go here ..
END;
Example of a procedure/function block...
[CREATE OR REPLACE] (PROCEDURE|FUNCTION) <proc or fn name> [(<parameters>)] [RETURN <datatype>] (IS|AS)
.. declarative statements go here ..
BEGIN
.. code statements go here ..
EXCEPTION
.. exception handlers go here ..
END;
(Note: The same can also be done for packages, but let's keep it simple)
2. Execution of the Execution Block
This may seem a simple concept, but it's surprising how many people have issues showing they haven't grasped it. When an Execution block is entered, the declaration section is processed, creating a scope of variables, types , cursors, etc. to be visible to the execution block and then execution enters into the Statements section. Each statment in the statements section is executed in turn and when the execution completes the last statment the execution block is exited back to whatever called it.
3. Exceptions
Exceptions generally happen during the execution of statements in the Statements section. When an exception happens the execution of statements jumps immediately into the exception section. In this section we can specify what exceptions we wish to 'capture' or 'trap' and do one of the two following things...
(Note: The exception section still has access to all the declared items in the declaration section)
3.i) Handle the exception
We do this when we recognise what the exception is (most likely it's something we expect to happen) and we have a means of dealing with it so that our application can continue on.
Example...
(without the exception handler the exception is passed back to the calling code, in this case SQL*Plus)
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 v_name VARCHAR2(20);
3 begin
4 select ename
5 into v_name
6 from emp
7 where empno = &empno;
8 dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
9* end;
SQL> /
Enter value for empno: 123
old 7: where empno = &empno;
new 7: where empno = 123;
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at line 4
(with an exception handler, we capture the exception, handle it how we want to, and the calling code is happy that there is no error for it to report)
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 v_name VARCHAR2(20);
3 begin
4 select ename
5 into v_name
6 from emp
7 where empno = &empno;
8 dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
9 exception
10 when no_data_found then
11 dbms_output.put_line('There is no employee with this employee number.');
12* end;
SQL> /
Enter value for empno: 123
old 7: where empno = &empno;
new 7: where empno = 123;
There is no employee with this employee number.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
3.ii) Raise the exception
We do this when:-
a) we recognise the exception, handle it but still want to let the calling code know that it happened
b) we recognise the exception, wish to log it happened and then let the calling code deal with it
c) we don't recognise the exception and we want the calling code to deal with it
Example of b)
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 v_name VARCHAR2(20);
3 v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
4 begin
5 select ename
6 into v_name
7 from emp
8 where empno = v_empno;
9 dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
10 EXCEPTION
11 WHEN no_data_found THEN
12 INSERT INTO sql_errors (txt)
13 VALUES ('Search for '||v_empno||' failed.');
14 COMMIT;
15 RAISE;
16* end;
SQL> /
Enter value for empno: 123
old 3: v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
new 3: v_empno NUMBER := 123;
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at line 15
SQL> select * from sql_errors;
TXT
Search for 123 failed.
SQL>
Example of c)
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 v_name VARCHAR2(20);
3 v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
4 begin
5 select ename
6 into v_name
7 from emp
8 where empno = v_empno;
9 dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
10 EXCEPTION
11 WHEN no_data_found THEN
12 INSERT INTO sql_errors (txt)
13 VALUES ('Search for '||v_empno||' failed.');
14 COMMIT;
15 RAISE;
16 WHEN others THEN
17 RAISE;
18* end;
SQL> /
Enter value for empno: 'ABC'
old 3: v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
new 3: v_empno NUMBER := 'ABC';
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character to number conversion error
ORA-06512: at line 3
SQL> select * from sql_errors;
TXT
Search for 123 failed.
SQL>
As you can see from the sql_errors log table, no log was written so the WHEN others exception was the exception that raised the error to the calling code (SQL*Plus)
4. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 2)
Ok, so now we understand the very basics of an execution block and what happens when an exception happens. Let's take it a step further...
Execution blocks are not just a single simple block in most cases. Often, during our statements section we have a need to call some reusable code and we do that by calling a procedure or function. Effectively this nests the procedure or function's code as another execution block within the current statement section so, in terms of execution, we end up with something like...
+---------------------------------+
| Declaration Section |
+---------------------------------+
| Statements Section |
| . |
| +---------------------------+ |
| | Declaration Section | |
| +---------------------------+ |
| | Statements Section | |
| +---------------------------+ |
| | Exception Section | |
| +---------------------------+ |
| . |
+---------------------------------+
| Exception Section |
+---------------------------------+
Example... (Note: log_trace just writes some text to a table for tracing)
SQL> create or replace procedure a as
2 v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Procedure A''s Declaration Section');
3 begin
4 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure A''s Statement Section');
5 v_dummy := 1/0; -- cause an exception
6 exception
7 when others then
8 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure A''s Exception Section');
9 raise;
10 end;
11 /
Procedure created.
SQL> create or replace procedure b as
2 v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Procedure B''s Declaration Section');
3 begin
4 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Statement Section');
5 a; -- HERE the execution passes to the declare/statement/exception sections of A
6 exception
7 when others then
8 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Exception Section');
9 raise;
10 end;
11 /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec b;
BEGIN b; END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01476: divisor is equal to zero
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.B", line 9
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL> select * from code_trace;
TXT
Procedure B's Declaration Section
Procedure B's Statement Section
Procedure A's Declaration Section
Procedure A's Statement Section
Procedure A's Exception Section
Procedure B's Exception Section
6 rows selected.
SQL>
Likewise, execution blocks can be nested deeper and deeper.
5. How to continue exection of statements after an exception
One of the common questions asked is how to return execution to the statement after the one that created the exception and continue on.
Well, firstly, you can only do this for statements you expect to raise an exception, such as when you want to check if there is no data found in a query.
If you consider what's been shown above you could put any statement you expect to cause an exception inside it's own procedure or function with it's own exception section to handle the exception without raising it back to the calling code. However, the nature of procedures and functions is really to provide a means of re-using code, so if it's a statement you only use once it seems a little silly to go creating individual procedures for these.
Instead, you nest execution blocks directly, to give the same result as shown in the diagram at the start of part 4 of this article.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure b (p_empno IN VARCHAR2) as
2 v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Procedure B''s Declaration Section');
3 begin
4 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Statement Section');
5 -- Here we start another execution block nested in the first one...
6 declare
7 v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Nested Block Declaration Section');
8 begin
9 v_dummy := log_trace('Nested Block Statement Section');
10 select empno
11 into v_dummy
12 from emp
13 where empno = p_empno; -- Note: the parameters and variables from
 parent execution block are available to use!
14 exception
15 when no_data_found then
16 -- This is an exception we can handle so we don't raise it
17 v_dummy := log_trace('No employee was found');
18 v_dummy := log_trace('Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Handled');
19 when others then
20 -- Other exceptions we can't handle so we raise them
21 v_dummy := log_trace('Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Raised');
22 raise;
23 end;
24 -- ...Here endeth the nested execution block
25 -- As the nested block handled it's exception we come back to here...
26 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Statement Section Continued');
27 exception
28 when others then
29 -- We'll only get to here if an unhandled exception was raised
30 -- either in the nested block or in procedure b's statement section
31 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Exception Section');
32 raise;
33* end;
SQL> /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec b(123);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select * from code_trace;
TXT
Procedure B's Declaration Section
Procedure B's Statement Section
Nested Block Declaration Section
Nested Block Statement Section
No employee was found
Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Handled
Procedure B's Statement Section Continued
7 rows selected.
SQL> truncate table code_trace;
Table truncated.
SQL> exec b('ABC');
BEGIN b('ABC'); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01722: invalid number
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.B", line 32
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL> select * from code_trace;
TXT
Procedure B's Declaration Section
Procedure B's Statement Section
Nested Block Declaration Section
Nested Block Statement Section
Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Raised
Procedure B's Exception Section
6 rows selected.
SQL>
You can see from this that, very simply, the code that we expected may have an exception was able to either handle the exception and return to the outer execution block to continue execution, or if an unexpected exception occurred then it was able to be raised up to the outer exception section.
6. User defined exceptions
There are three sorts of 'User Defined' exceptions. There are logical situations (e.g. business logic) where, for example, certain criteria are not met to complete a task, and there are existing Oracle errors that you wish to give a name to in order to capture them in the exception section. The third is raising your own exception messages with our own exception numbers. Let's look at the first one...
Let's say I have tables which detail stock availablility and reorder levels...
SQL> select * from reorder_level;
 ITEM_ID STOCK_LEVEL
 1 20
 2 20
 3 10
 4 2
 5 2
SQL> select * from stock;
 ITEM_ID ITEM_DESC STOCK_LEVEL
 1 Pencils 10
 2 Pens 2
 3 Notepads 25
 4 Stapler 5
 5 Hole Punch 3
SQL>
Now, our Business has told the administrative clerk to check stock levels and re-order anything that is below the re-order level, but not to hold stock of more than 4 times the re-order level for any particular item. As an IT department we've been asked to put together an application that will automatically produce the re-order documents upon the clerks request and, because our company is so tight-ar*ed about money, they don't want to waste any paper with incorrect printouts so we have to ensure the clerk can't order things they shouldn't.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
2 cursor cur_stock_reorder is
3 select s.stock_level
4 ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
5 ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
6 from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
7 where s.item_id = p_item_id;
8 --
9 v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
10 begin
11 OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
12 FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
13 IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
14 RAISE no_data_found;
15 END IF;
16 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
17 --
18 IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
19 -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
20 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
21 ELSE
22 IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
23 -- Required amount is over-ordering
24 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: '
 ||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
25 ELSE
26 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK. Printing Order...');
27 -- Here goes our code to print the order
28 END IF;
29 END IF;
30 --
31 exception
32 WHEN no_data_found THEN
33 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
34 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
35* end;
SQL> /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec re_order(10,100);
Invalid Item ID.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(3,40);
Stock has not reached re-order level yet!
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(1,100);
Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: 70
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(2,50);
Order OK. Printing Order...
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
Ok, so that code works, but it's a bit messy with all those nested IF statements. Is there a cleaner way perhaps? Wouldn't it be nice if we could set up our own exceptions...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
2 cursor cur_stock_reorder is
3 select s.stock_level
4 ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
5 ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
6 from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
7 where s.item_id = p_item_id;
8 --
9 v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
10 --
11 -- Let's declare our own exceptions for business logic...
12 exc_not_warranted EXCEPTION;
13 exc_too_much EXCEPTION;
14 begin
15 OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
16 FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
17 IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
18 RAISE no_data_found;
19 END IF;
20 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
21 --
22 IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
23 -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
24 RAISE exc_not_warranted;
25 END IF;
26 --
27 IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
28 -- Required amount is over-ordering
29 RAISE exc_too_much;
30 END IF;
31 --
32 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK. Printing Order...');
33 -- Here goes our code to print the order
34 --
35 exception
36 WHEN no_data_found THEN
37 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
38 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
39 WHEN exc_not_warranted THEN
40 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
41 WHEN exc_too_much THEN
42 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: '
 ||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
43* end;
SQL> /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec re_order(10,100);
Invalid Item ID.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(3,40);
Stock has not reached re-order level yet!
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(1,100);
Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: 70
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(2,50);
Order OK. Printing Order...
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
That's better. And now we don't have to use all those nested IF statements and worry about it accidently getting to code that will print the order out as, once one of our user defined exceptions is raised, execution goes from the Statements section into the Exception section and all handling of errors is done in one place.
Now for the second sort of user defined exception...
A new requirement has come in from the Finance department who want to have details shown on the order that show a re-order 'indicator' based on the formula ((maximum allowed stock - current stock)/re-order quantity), so this needs calculating and passing to the report...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
2 cursor cur_stock_reorder is
3 select s.stock_level
4 ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
5 ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
6 ,(((r.stock_level*4)-s.stock_level)/p_quantity) as finance_factor
7 from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
8 where s.item_id = p_item_id;
9 --
10 v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
11 --
12 -- Let's declare our own exceptions for business logic...
13 exc_not_warranted EXCEPTION;
14 exc_too_much EXCEPTION;
15 begin
16 OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
17 FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
18 IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
19 RAISE no_data_found;
20 END IF;
21 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
22 --
23 IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
24 -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
25 RAISE exc_not_warranted;
26 END IF;
27 --
28 IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
29 -- Required amount is over-ordering
30 RAISE exc_too_much;
31 END IF;
32 --
33 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK. Printing Order...');
34 -- Here goes our code to print the order, passing the finance_factor
35 --
36 exception
37 WHEN no_data_found THEN
38 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
39 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
40 WHEN exc_not_warranted THEN
41 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
42 WHEN exc_too_much THEN
43 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: '
 ||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
44* end;
SQL> /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec re_order(2,40);
Order OK. Printing Order...
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(2,0);
BEGIN re_order(2,0); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01476: divisor is equal to zero
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.RE_ORDER", line 17
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL>
Hmm, there's a problem if the person specifies a re-order quantity of zero. It raises an unhandled exception.
Well, we could put a condition/check into our code to make sure the parameter is not zero, but again we would be wrapping our code in an IF statement and not dealing with the exception in the exception handler.
We could do as we did before and just include a simple IF statement to check the value and raise our own user defined exception but, in this instance the error is standard Oracle error (ORA-01476) so we should be able to capture it inside the exception handler anyway... however...
EXCEPTION
WHEN ORA-01476 THEN
... is not valid. What we need is to give this Oracle error a name.
This is done by declaring a user defined exception as we did before and then associating that name with the error number using the PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT statement in the declaration section.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
2 cursor cur_stock_reorder is
3 select s.stock_level
4 ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
5 ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
6 ,(((r.stock_level*4)-s.stock_level)/p_quantity) as finance_factor
7 from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
8 where s.item_id = p_item_id;
9 --
10 v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
11 --
12 -- Let's declare our own exceptions for business logic...
13 exc_not_warranted EXCEPTION;
14 exc_too_much EXCEPTION;
15 --
16 exc_zero_quantity EXCEPTION;
17 PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT(exc_zero_quantity, -1476);
18 begin
19 OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
20 FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
21 IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
22 RAISE no_data_found;
23 END IF;
24 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
25 --
26 IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
27 -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
28 RAISE exc_not_warranted;
29 END IF;
30 --
31 IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
32 -- Required amount is over-ordering
33 RAISE exc_too_much;
34 END IF;
35 --
36 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK. Printing Order...');
37 -- Here goes our code to print the order, passing the finance_factor
38 --
39 exception
40 WHEN exc_zero_quantity THEN
41 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity of 0 (zero) is invalid.');
42 WHEN no_data_found THEN
43 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
44 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
45 WHEN exc_not_warranted THEN
46 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
47 WHEN exc_too_much THEN
48 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: '
 ||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
49* end;
SQL> /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec re_order(2,0);
Quantity of 0 (zero) is invalid.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
Lastly, let's look at raising our own exceptions with our own exception numbers...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
2 cursor cur_stock_reorder is
3 select s.stock_level
4 ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
5 ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
6 ,(((r.stock_level*4)-s.stock_level)/p_quantity) as finance_factor
7 from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
8 where s.item_id = p_item_id;
9 --
10 v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
11 --
12 exc_zero_quantity EXCEPTION;
13 PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT(exc_zero_quantity, -1476);
14 begin
15 OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
16 FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
17 IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
18 RAISE no_data_found;
19 END IF;
20 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
21 --
22 IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
23 -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
24 [b]RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20000, 'Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');[/b]
25 END IF;
26 --
27 IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
28 -- Required amount is over-ordering
29

its nice article, have put up this one the blog
site,Nah, I don't have time to blog, but if one of the other Ace's/Experts wants to copy it to a blog with reference back to here (and all due credit given ;)) then that's fine by me.
I'd go for a book like "Selected articles by OTN members" or something. Does anybody have a list of links of all those mentioned articles?Just these ones I've bookmarked...
Introduction to regular expressions ... by CD
When your query takes too long ... by Rob van Wijk
How to pipeline a function with a dynamic number of columns? by ascheffer
PL/SQL 101 : Exception Handling by BluShadow

Exception handling framework?

Can anyone recommend an exception handling framework or perhaps pattern for Applets?
Thanks, Tom.

Methinks you're gonna be stuck. Unless every catch block already happens to call some central method (or small set of methods) and passes in the exception, there is no way I can think of to "flip a switch" and magically have all your catch blocks start logging messages when they weren't before. You'll probably have to change the code every place you want to log something. This is why it's a great idea to think of those sorts of things before coding a huge application. :-) I'm not criticizing you since it sounds like you inherited this.

Exception handling in File to IDoc Scenario

Hi,
I have successfully configured File to IDoc Scenario. Now I want to include some exception handling which should be capable of create a mail to recipient when a mapping error occurs.
Can anybody help me out?
Regards,
Suraj Kumar

Hi Suraj,
A few points while creating ALERTS.
TESTING YOUR ALERT CONFIGURATIOn
go to se37 --> and execute the report RSALERTTEST. GIve your ALERT CATEGORY in this report. If your ALERTS are configured properly, then your Alert would be triggered and you can see the entry in ALERT INBBOX.
ALERT RULE
Make sure that in your Alert Rule, the option Suppress Multiple Alerts of this rule has not been seelcted.
Finally, if you are on SP14 and above check this note 913858 for alerts.
If you are below Sp14, then this blog can help you set the background processes needed.
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/09/xi-alerts--troubleshooting-guide
No BPMis needed to trigger alerts in either case.
Do get back for any clarifications,
Regards,
Bhavesh

Exception Handling of Screenflows inside Processes

Greetings,
We are currently encountering a problem where some unhandled Exceptions are not being caught in our BPM application.
Whenever an exception occurs inside a process, BPM has provided a way of handling those exceptions by using the “Process Exception” activity (this looks like a small lightning bolt). All errors that are not caught but are of the compatible type would fall into this activity and get processed.
The problem arises when your process has a Global Activity Interactive Screenflow. Whenever this screenflow encounters an error inside its flow, it does not get caught by the “Process Exception” activity even though this process was the one that invoked it.
We can try to make some exception handling per automatic activity inside the Screenflow itself but this usually results in large try-catch statements and multiple connections to custom defined exception activities. This may not be the optimal solution to this.
Would anyone be able to shed some light on this or offer some best practices on how to resolve these issues?
Thank you very much!
Oracle BPM Suite 10.3.2

Wish I had a better answer for you. Telling you something that you already know, but if you've defined the Global's property with "Has instance access" then you can catch the exceptions in the process.
Undoubtedly though, you've got a standalone Global or you would not be asking the question. The exception from a Global that does not have instance access can't get caught in the process because there was never an instance created for it inside the process.

Oracle exception handling

is this right way do to coding and exception handling
2 cases
if we get overwrite = 1 then update else insert.
I am not sure i have handled proper user defined exception.
Please advise.
create or replace procedure get_rc1(in_file_name in VARCHAR2, overwrite number) is
o_error_number number;
err_exception EXCEPTION;
begin
IF overwrite = 1 THEN
UPDATE store
SET uploaded_by = 'ram'
WHERE file_name = in_file_name;
dbms_output.put_line ('update');
IF (SQL%ROWCOUNT > 0)
THEN
history_log(p_key_id => '123',
desc => 'v_his_desc',
key_word => 'p1' ,
ser_id => 'ram',
status => NULL,
p_error_number => o_error_number);
IF o_error_number <> 0
THEN
RAISE err_exception;
END IF;
END IF;
ELSE
dbms_output.put_line ('insert');
INSERT
INTO store
ID
,FILE_LENGTH
,FILE_NAME
,DOCUMENT_IMAGE
,UPLOADED_DATE
,UPLOADED_BY
,MIME_TYPE
VALUES
1234,
12345,
'123',
NULL ,
sysdate,
'[email protected]',
'balaji'
IF (SQL%ROWCOUNT > 0)
THEN
history_log(p_key_id => '123',
desc => 'v_his_desc',
key_word => 'p2' ,
ser_id => 'ram',
status => NULL,
p_error_number => o_error_number);
IF o_error_number <> 0
THEN
RAISE err_exception;
END IF;
END IF;
END IF;
-- maintaining the history and setting the message
commit;
exception
when others then
dbms_output.put_line ( sqlerrm);
END;

Hi,
user4485803 wrote:
is this right way do to coding and exception handling
2 cases
if we get overwrite = 1 then update else insert.
I am not sure i have handled proper user defined exception.
Please advise.When posting formatted text on this site, type these 6 characters:
\(small letters only, inside curly brackets) before and after each section of formatted text, to preserve spacing.
create or replace procedure get_rc1(in_file_name in VARCHAR2, overwrite number) is
o_error_number number;
err_exception EXCEPTION;
begin
IF overwrite = 1 THEN
UPDATE store
SET uploaded_by = 'ram'
WHERE file_name = in_file_name;
dbms_output.put_line ('update');
IF (SQL%ROWCOUNT > 0)
THEN
history_log(p_key_id => '123',
desc => 'v_his_desc',
key_word => 'p1' ,
ser_id => 'ram',
status => NULL,
p_error_number => o_error_number);
IF o_error_number <> 0Did you mean IF o_error_number 1= 0
? This site doesn't like to display the <> inequality operator. Use the equivalent != operator when posting here.
THEN
RAISE err_exception;
END IF;
END IF;
ELSE
dbms_output.put_line ('insert');
INSERT
INTO store
ID
,FILE_LENGTH
,FILE_NAME
,DOCUMENT_IMAGE
,UPLOADED_DATE
,UPLOADED_BY
,MIME_TYPE
VALUES
1234,
12345,
'123',
NULL ,
sysdate,
'[email protected]',
'balaji'
IF (SQL%ROWCOUNT > 0)
THEN
history_log(p_key_id => '123',
desc => 'v_his_desc',
key_word => 'p2' ,
ser_id => 'ram',
status => NULL,
p_error_number => o_error_number);
IF o_error_number <> 0
THEN
RAISE err_exception;
END IF;
END IF;
END IF;
-- maintaining the history and setting the message
commit;
exception
when others then
dbms_output.put_line ( sqlerrm);
END;That looks like the correct way to raise an error.
If you don't have an EXCEPTION section, then PL/SQL will display an error message, including the line number where the error was detected. If the error occurred deep in a series of called procedures, the error message will include information about what procedures were called, and where. All of that is potentially very important information, and all of that is lost if you have your own EXCEPTION handler, like the one above. Acutally, it would be better to call the code above a exception *hider* , not a handler, because all it's really doing is hiding details about any error.
Use an EXCEPTION sedction only when you can improve on the default exception handling. Even then, you rarely want to use WHEN *OTHERS* ; you want to check for specific errors. For example...
EXCEPTION
WHEN err_exception
THEN
END;
If any exception other than err_exception occurs, this will not hide it.

Exception handling on ALL activities

Hi there,
I have a request for a new feature in ES Next:
It would be great to have exception handling (lightning bolt) on ALL services, including set values and decision activitíes. In this way you could easier catch errors with malformed xml and stuff like that.
Sincerely
Kim Christensen
Dafolo A/S

you can handle exceptions in workbench. When you select activities a small circle displays on that activity. Drag that small circle and set it to setValue.
so if exception will come that part will be executed and you can assign an appropriate message(using setValue) to your output variable.
Message was edited by: aks@lc

Defensive programming vs exception handling

Hi
im new to java programming and having problems getting my head around defensive programming vs exception handling.
i've read in my uni books about design by contract and the idea of defensive programming but im having problems with it.
so say i write the code.
String container = //some value
if (container.equals.("")) // so if i am looking for a value and find a empty String
   throw new // a custom exception i have made for this error.
else
   //do whatever i had planned with a non-empty String
}is this Defensive programming or exception handling. Or am i complete of base.
thanks

jverd wrote:
JustSomeGuy wrote:
Don't fall into the trap of saying "Meh, the exception will handle it". If you can forsee something easily being a problem, and it can be controlled, then control it. Save the exception handling for those things you don't forsee and those you can't control. I disagree. Or at least, I disagree with what I think you're saying.
For instance, if null is not a valid argument, then document it, and don't waste code defending against it. Either throw an explicit IllegalArgumentException, or let the NPE be thrown.
And absolutely under no circumstances should you ever write code that will deliberately lead to an exception, Eh? If an exceptional condition occurs, you should delibrately throw an exception. Consider if you will the following code snippet
import java.io.*;
class ExceptionExample {
    public static void main(String[] args)
        throws IOException {
        if (args.length == 0) {
            System.out.println("Must give filename as first arg.");
            return;
        FileInputStream in;
        try {
            in = new FileInputStream(args[0]);
        catch (FileNotFoundException e) {
            System.out.println("Can't find file: " + args[0]);
            return;
        int ch;
        while ((ch = in.read()) != -1) {
            System.out.print((char) ch);
        System.out.println();
        in.close();
} What I was saying in the first part is shown with the following part of the above code
if (args.length == 0) {
   System.out.println("Must give filename as first arg.");
   return;
} Would the exception handler that follows this peice of code have taken care of that? Sure! Would it be the best choice to just let the exception handler do it? No way no how!
It is easy to forsee someone forgetting or not realizing they need to add the filename as an arg and it can be controlled, so in this and most cases just like it the best choice is to either inform the user with a more specific statement than could be used in the exceptionhandler and do nothing or fix it yourself like for instance by using a default filename.
What I meant by deliberately throwing an exception can be illustrated with this small portion of my code above
int ch;
while ((ch = in.read()) != -1) {
    System.out.print((char) ch);
} A -1 to mark the EOF is expected and reaching the EOF is expected. There is absolutely nothing abnormal about this, so it should not be handled by an exception. But far to often I have seen novice and especially "think they know it all novices" use an exception in place of exactly this. They know the file will end, they know they must do something about that, but instead of doing it right they just set it up so an exception will be thrown and they can just handle it in the exceptionhandler. This is what I meant by deliberately throwing exceptions, in that an exception must be thrown in order for their program to work as intended. Bad, very bad.
Now that I have provided an example and further clarified my position do you still disagree? I can't imagine you would, so if you do I would be very interested in getting some further insight into your reasoning.
JSG

Good exception handling policy for Java web application

I'm looking for a good exception handling policy for Java web application. First I found this Java exception handling best practices - How To Do In Java which says that you should never catch the Trowable class nor use e.printStackTrace();
Then I found this Oracle page The Message-Driven Bean Class - The Java EE 6 Tutorial, which does just that. So now I'm confused. Is there a good page online for an exception handling policy for Java EE Web applications? I have a hard time finding one. I've read that you should not catch the Exception class. I've been catching it previously to make sure that some unknown exception doesn't slip through early in the loop and stops all other customers from executing later on in the loop. We have a loop which runs once a minute implemented using the Quartz framework. Is it OK if you just change the implementation to catch the RuntimeException class instead of the Exception class? We're using Java 7 and the Jetty Servlet Container.

I'm looking for a good exception handling policy for Java web application.
If you have not done so I suggest you start by reviewing the several trails in The Java Tutorials.
Those trails cover both HOW to use exceptions and WHEN to use them.
This trail discusses the 'controversy' you mention regarding 'Unchecked Exceptions'
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/runtime.html
Unchecked Exceptions — The Controversy
Because the Java programming language does not require methods to catch or to specify unchecked exceptions (RuntimeException, Error, and their subclasses), programmers may be tempted to write code that throws only unchecked exceptions or to make all their exception subclasses inherit from RuntimeException. Both of these shortcuts allow programmers to write code without bothering with compiler errors and without bothering to specify or to catch any exceptions. Although this may seem convenient to the programmer, it sidesteps the intent of the catch or specify requirement and can cause problems for others using your classes.
Why did the designers decide to force a method to specify all uncaught checked exceptions that can be thrown within its scope? Any Exception that can be thrown by a method is part of the method's public programming interface. Those who call a method must know about the exceptions that a method can throw so that they can decide what to do about them. These exceptions are as much a part of that method's programming interface as its parameters and return value.
The next question might be: "If it's so good to document a method's API, including the exceptions it can throw, why not specify runtime exceptions too?" Runtime exceptions represent problems that are the result of a programming problem, and as such, the API client code cannot reasonably be expected to recover from them or to handle them in any way. Such problems include arithmetic exceptions, such as dividing by zero; pointer exceptions, such as trying to access an object through a null reference; and indexing exceptions, such as attempting to access an array element through an index that is too large or too small.
Generally don't catch an exception unless you plan to HANDLE the exception. Logging, by itself is NOT handliing.
First I found this Java exception handling best practices - How To Do In Java which says that you should never catch the Trowable class nor use e.printStackTrace();
That article, like many, has some good advice and some poor or even bad advice. You get what you pay for!
I've read that you should not catch the Exception class.
Ok - but all that does is indicate that a problem of some sort happened somewhere. Not very useful info. Java goes to a lot of trouble to provide specific exceptions for specific problems.
I've been catching it previously to make sure that some unknown exception doesn't slip through early in the loop and stops all other customers from executing later on in the loop.
If the exception is 'unknown' then maybe it NEEDS to 'stop all other customers from executing later on in the loop'.
That is EXACTLY why you don't want to do that. You need to identify which exceptions should NOT stop processing and which ones should.
Some 'unknown' exceptions can NOT be recovered and indicate a serious problem, perhaps with the JVM itself. You can NOT just blindly keep executing and ignore them without risking data corruption and/or the integrity of the entire system Java is running on.
Is it OK if you just change the implementation to catch the RuntimeException class instead of the Exception class? We're using Java 7 and the Jetty Servlet Container.
No - not if you want a well-behaved system.
Don't catch exceptions unless you HANDLE/resolve them. There are times when it makes sense to log the exception (which does NOT handle it) and then raise it again so that it gets handled properly later. Yes - I know that is contrary to the advice given in that article but, IMHO, that article is wrong about that point.
If you have ever had to maintain/fix/support someone else's Java code you should already understand how difficult it can be to find WHERE a problem occurs and WHAT the exact problem is when exceptions are not handled properly.

MC.9 and MCY1 and Exception Handling in (Logistics Inf. Sys)LIS

Hi,
I want the 'Valuated Stock Value" greater then or equal to zero (>=) appear in the MC.9 report. I can create 'Exception' in MCY1 but am unable to do so. Once I am in MCY1; I choose 'Requirements' then Key Figure 'Valuated Stock Value' then 'Type of condition' is 'Threshold Val. Anal.' is set to '> 0'. However, the report still displays zero values in MC.9. I don't want to display 'Valuated Stock Value' zero to be displayed on the report. Please help.
Thanks
Naved

Hey Chris,
I got the point for exception handling in weblogic 9.2. We ae using 9.2. It comes up with the concept of shared page flows which means all my unhandled exceptions are thrown to the shared page flow controller. There based on the type of exception, i can forward the request to appropraite page.
Thanks anywyas,
Saurabh

Delete Statement Exception Handling

Hi guys,
I have a problem in my procedure. There are 3 parameters that I am passing into the procedure. I am matching these parameters to those in the table to delete one record at a time.
For example if I would like to delete the record with the values ('900682',3,'29-JUL-2008') as parameters, it deletes the record from the table but then again when I execute it with the same parameters it should show me an error message but it again says 'Deleted the Transcript Request.....' Can you please help me with this?
PROCEDURE p_delete_szptpsr_1 (p_shttran_id IN saturn.shttran.shttran_id%TYPE,
p_shttran_seq_no IN saturn.shttran.shttran_seq_no%TYPE,
p_shttran_request_date IN saturn.shttran.shttran_request_date%TYPE) IS
BEGIN
DELETE FROM saturn.shttran
WHERE shttran.shttran_id = p_shttran_id
and shttran.shttran_seq_no = p_shttran_seq_no
and trunc(shttran_request_date) = trunc(p_shttran_request_date);
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Deleted the Transcript Request Seq No (' || p_shttran_seq_no || ') of the Student (' || p_shttran_id ||') for the requested date of (' || p_shttran_request_date ||')');
COMMIT;
EXCEPTION WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Error: The supplied Notre Dame Student ID = (' || p_shttran_id ||
'), Transcript Request No = (' || p_shttran_seq_no || '), Request Date = (' || p_shttran_request_date || ') was not found.');
END p_delete_szptpsr_1;
Should I have a SELECT statement to use NO_DATA_FOUND ???

A DELETE statement that deletes no rows (just like an UPDATE statement that updates no rows) is not an error to Oracle. Oracle won't throw any exception.
If you want your code to throw an exception, you'll need to write that logic. You could throw a NO_DATA_FOUND exception yourself, i.e.
IF( SQL%ROWCOUNT = 0 )
THEN
RAISE no_data_found;
END IF;If you are just going to catch the exception, though, you could just embed whatever code you would use to handle the exception in your IF statement, i.e.
IF( SQL%ROWCOUNT = 0 )
THEN
<<do something about the exception>>
END IF;In your original code, your exception handler is just a DBMS_OUTPUT statement. That is incredibly dangerous in real production code. You are relying on the fact that the client has enabled output, that the client has allocated a large enough buffer, that the user is going to see the message, and that the procedure will never be called from any piece of code that would ever care if it succeeded or failed. There are vanishingly few situations where those are safe things to rely on.
Justin

Exception handling is not working in GCC compile shared object

Hello,
I am facing very strange issue on Solaris x86_64 platform with C++ code compiled usging gcc.3.4.3.
I have compiled shared object that load into web server process space while initialization. Whenever any exception generate in code base, it is not being caught by exception handler. Even though exception handlers are there. Same code is working fine since long time but on Solaris x86, Sparc arch, Linux platform
With Dbx, I am getting following stack trace.
Stack trace is
dbx: internal error: reference through NULL pointer at line 973 in file symbol.cc
[1] 0x11335(0x1, 0x1, 0x474e5543432b2b00, 0x59cb60, 0xfffffd7fffdff2b0, 0x11335), at 0x11335
---- hidden frames, use 'where -h' to see them all ----
=>[4] __cxa_throw(obj = (nil), tinfo = (nil), dest = (nil), , line 75 in "eh_throw.cc"
[5] OBWebGate_Authent(r = 0xfffffd7fff3fb300), line 86 in "apache.cpp"
[6] ap_run_post_config(0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0), at 0x444624
[7] main(0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0), at 0x42c39a
I am using following link options.
Compile option is
/usr/sfw/bin/g++ -c -I/scratch/ashishas/view_storage/build/coreid1014/palantir/apache22/solaris-x86_64/include -m64 -fPIC -D_REENTRANT -Wall -g -o apache.o apache.cpp
Link option is
/usr/sfw/bin/g++ -shared -m64 -o apache.so apache.o -lsocket -lnsl -ldl -lpthread -lthread
At line 86, we are just throwing simple exception which have catch handlers in place. Also we do have catch(...) handler as well.
Surpursing things are..same issue didn't observe if we make it as executable.
Issue only comes if this is shared object loaded on webserver. If this is plain shared object, opened by anyother exe, it works fine.
Can someone help me out. This is completly blocking issue for us. Using Solaris Sun Studio compiler is no option as of now.

shared object that load into web server process space
... same issue didn't observe if we make it as executable.When you "inject" your shared object into some other process a well-being of your exception handling depends on that other process.
Mechanics of x64 stack traversing (unwind) performed when you throw the exception is quite complicated,
particularly involving a "nearly-standartized" Unwind interface (say, Unwind_RaiseException).
When we are talking about g++ on Solaris there are two implementations of unwind interface, one in libc and one in libgcc_s.so.
When you g++-compile the executable you get it directly linked with libgcc_s.so and Unwind stuff resolves into libgccs.
When g++-compiled shared object is loaded into non-g++-compiled executable's process _Unwind calls are most likely already resolved into Solaris libc.
Thats why you might see the difference.
Now, what exactly causes this difference can vary, I can only speculate.
All that would not be a problem if _Unwind interface was completely standartized and properly implemented.
However there are two issues currently:
* gcc (libstdc++ in particular) happens to use additional non-standard _Unwind calls which are not present in Solaris libc
naturally, implementation details of Unwind implementation in libc differs to that of libgccs, so when all the standard _Unwind
routines are resolved into Solaris version and one non-standard _Unwind routine is resolved into gcc version you get a problem
(most likely that is what happens with you)
* libc Unwind sometimes is unable to decipher the code generated by gcc.
However that is likely to happen with modern gcc (say, 4.4+) and not that likely with 3.4.3
Btw, you can check your call frame to see where _Unwind calls come from:
where -h -lIf you indeed stomped on "mixed _Unwind" problem then the only chance for you is to play with linker
so it binds Unwind stuff from your library directly into libgccs.
Not tried it myself though.
regards,
__Fedor.

Exception handling to catch the outcome of a select

Hello,
I want to use exception handling to exit me out of a function module. I want to have one exception for all errors.
For example, if this select statement does not work, how do I finish up this code to make it work.
error type cx_bsx
try
select * from t001 where BUKRS = '!@#$'
catch <not sure what> into INTO error
raise exception error
endtry.
When I use cx_bsx with the catch, nothing happens even though the select statement fails. Basically I want the catch to work in the same manner as this:
if sy-subrc ne 0.
raise error_table_read.
endif.

If this code is in a function module, then why not just use the function module exceptions.
if sy-subrc ne 0.
raise error_table_read.
endif.
What are you gaining by "catching" this exception in the function module. By using the "exceptions" part of the function module, you are passing this exception back to the calling program.
Regards,
Rich Heilman

Exception handling for all the insert statements in the proc

CREATE PROCEDURE TEST (
@IncrStartDate DATE
,@IncrEndDate DATE
,@SourceRowCount INT OUTPUT
,@TargetRowCount INT OUTPUT
,@ErrorNumber INT OUTPUT
,@ErrorMessage VARCHAR(4000) OUTPUT
,@InsertCase INT --INSERT CASE INPUT
WITH
EXEC AS CALLER AS
BEGIN --Main Begin
SET NOCOUNT ON
BEGIN TRY
DECLARE @SuccessNumber INT = 0
,@SuccessMessage VARCHAR(100) = 'SUCCESS'
,@BenchMarkLoadFlag CHAR(1)
,@BenchmarkFlow INT
,@MonthYearStart DATE
,@MonthYearEnd DATE
,@StartDate DATE
,@EndDate DATE
/* Setting the default values of output parameters to 0.*/
SET @SourceRowCount = 0
SET @TargetRowCount = 0
/*Setting the Start and end date for looping */
SET @MonthYearStart = @IncrStartDate;
SET @MonthYearEnd = @IncrEndDate;
/* Setting the @InsertCase will ensure case wise insertion as this sp will load data in different tables
@InsertCase =0 means data will be inserted in the target TAB1
@InsertCase =1 means data will be inserted in the target TAB2
@InsertCase =2 means data will be inserted in the target TAB3
@InsertCase =3 means data will be inserted in the target TAB4
@InsertCase =4 means data will be inserted in the target TAB5
@InsertCase =5 means data will be inserted in the target TAB6
if @InsertCase =0
WHILE (@MonthYearStart <= @MonthYearEnd)
BEGIN
SET @StartDate = @MonthYearStart;
SET @EndDate = @MonthYearEnd;
/* Delete from target where date range given from input parameter*/
DELETE FROM TAB1
WHERE [MONTH] BETWEEN MONTH(@StartDate) AND MONTH(@EndDate)
AND [YEAR] BETWEEN year(@StartDate) and year(@EndDate)
/*Insert data in target-TAB1 */
BEGIN TRANSACTION
INSERT INTO TAB1
A,B,C
SELECT
A,BC
FROM XYZ
COMMIT TRANSACTION
SET @MonthYearStart = DATEADD(MONTH, 1, @MonthYearStart)
SELECT @TargetRowCount = @TargetRowCount + @@ROWCOUNT;
END -- End of whileloop
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
IF @@TRANCOUNT>0
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
SELECT @ErrorNumber = ERROR_NUMBER() ,@ErrorMessage = ERROR_MESSAGE();
END CATCH
END--End of Main Begin
I have the above proc inserting data based on parameters where in @InsertCase is used for case wise execution.
I have written the whole proc with exception handling using try catch block.
I have just added one insert statement here for 1 case now I need to add further insert cases
INSERT INTO TAB4
 A,B,C
SELECT
 A,BC
FROM XYZ
INSERT INTO TAB3
 A,B,C
SELECT
 A,BC
FROM XYZ
INSERT INTO TAB2
 A,B,C
SELECT
 A,BC
FROM XYZ
I will be using following to insert further insert statements
if @InsertCase =1
I just needed to know where will be my next insert statement should be fitting int his code so that i cover exception handling for all the code
Mudassar

Hi Erland & Mudassar, I have attempted to recreate Mudassar's original problem..here is my TABLE script;
USE [MSDNTSQL]
GO
/****** Object: Table [dbo].[TAB1] Script Date: 2/5/2014 7:47:48 AM ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[TAB1](
[COL1] [nvarchar](1) NULL,
[COL2] [nvarchar](1) NULL,
[COL3] [nvarchar](1) NULL,
[START_MONTH] [int] NULL,
[END_MONTH] [int] NULL,
[START_YEAR] [int] NULL,
[END_YEAR] [int] NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
Then here is a CREATE script for the SPROC..;
USE [MSDNTSQL]
GO
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[TryCatchTransactions1] Script Date: 2/5/2014 7:51:33 AM ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[TryCatchTransactions1] (
@IncrStartDate DATE
,@IncrEndDate DATE
,@SourceRowCount INT OUTPUT
,@TargetRowCount INT OUTPUT
,@ErrorNumber INT OUTPUT
,@ErrorMessage VARCHAR(4000) OUTPUT
,@InsertCase INT --INSERT CASE INPUT
WITH
EXEC AS CALLER AS
BEGIN --Main Begin
SET NOCOUNT ON
BEGIN TRY
DECLARE @SuccessNumber INT = 0
,@SuccessMessage VARCHAR(100) = 'SUCCESS'
,@BenchMarkLoadFlag CHAR(1)
,@BenchmarkFlow INT
,@MonthYearStart DATE
,@MonthYearEnd DATE
,@StartDate DATE
,@EndDate DATE
/* Setting the default values of output parameters to 0.*/
SET @SourceRowCount = 0
SET @TargetRowCount = 0
/*Setting the Start and end date for looping */
SET @MonthYearStart = @IncrStartDate;
SET @MonthYearEnd = @IncrEndDate;
/* Setting the @InsertCase will ensure case wise insertion as this sp will load data in different tables
@InsertCase =0 means data will be inserted in the target TAB1
@InsertCase =1 means data will be inserted in the target TAB2
@InsertCase =2 means data will be inserted in the target TAB3
@InsertCase =3 means data will be inserted in the target TAB4
@InsertCase =4 means data will be inserted in the target TAB5
@InsertCase =5 means data will be inserted in the target TAB6
IF @InsertCase =0
WHILE (@MonthYearStart <= @MonthYearEnd)
BEGIN
SET @StartDate = @MonthYearStart;
SET @EndDate = @MonthYearEnd;
/* Delete from target where date range given from input parameter*/
DELETE FROM TAB1
WHERE START_MONTH BETWEEN MONTH(@StartDate) AND MONTH(@EndDate)
AND START_YEAR BETWEEN year(@StartDate) and YEAR(@EndDate)
/*Insert data in target-TAB1 */
BEGIN TRANSACTION
INSERT INTO TAB1 (COL1,COL2,COL3)
VALUES ('Z','X','Y')
SELECT COL1, COL2, COL3
FROM TAB1
COMMIT TRANSACTION
SET @MonthYearStart = DATEADD(MONTH, 1, @MonthYearStart)
SELECT @TargetRowCount = @TargetRowCount + @@ROWCOUNT;
END -- End of whileloop
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
IF @@TRANCOUNT > 0
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
SELECT @ErrorNumber = ERROR_NUMBER() ,@ErrorMessage = ERROR_MESSAGE();
END CATCH
PRINT @SUCCESSMESSAGE
END--End of Main Begin
GO
I am just trying to help --danny rosales
UML, then code

ADF Task Flow Exception Handling

Hi ,
I tried a very simple thing for taskFlow exception handling.
I created a bounded task flow with a page fragment (View1.jsff) and another view which is the TaskFlow ExceptionHandler (error.jsff).
The view1.jsff has a button whose action is bound to the backing bean. In the backingBean method I deliberately do division by 0.
Since this is an unHandled exception, I would have expected the control to come to error.jsff. But, instead I am shown a pop up box with the error message.
Why is the control not getting redirected to error.jsff ?
Thanks.
S.Srivatsa Sivan

Hi Frank , im having the same problem.
I want to handle exceptions that occur while navigating task flows (example: A user navigates to a task flow that he/she does not have view permission)
I tried using a view activity and method activity as the exception handler but none of them works, the exception is still not handles. It does not even navigate to the exception handler on the task flow.
on the view page i have:
<af:panelStretchLayout topHeight="50px" id="psl1">
<f:facet name="top">
<af:panelGroupLayout layout="scroll"
xmlns:af="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/rich"
id="pgl1">
Error message:
<af:outputText value="#{controllerContext.currentRootViewPort.exceptionData.message}" id="ot2"/>
</af:panelGroupLayout>
</f:facet>
<f:facet name="center">
<af:outputText value="#{my_exception_Handler.stackTrace}" id="ot1"/>

</f:facet>
</af:panelStretchLayout>
I tried getting the error message and stacktrace from the controllerContext via EL like this "#{controllerContext.currentRootViewPort.exceptionData.message}"
and from the controllerContext class in functions that i have declared in my_exception_Handler class like this
" ControllerContext ctx = ControllerContext.getInstance();
ViewPortContext vCtx = ctx.getCurrentViewPort();
if(vCtx.getExceptionData() != null){
StringWriter stringWriter = new StringWriter();
PrintWriter printWriter = new PrintWriter(stringWriter);
vCtx.getExceptionData().printStackTrace(printWriter);
return stringWriter.toString();"
But all this dont even matter because when the exception occurs on the task flow it does not navigate to the default exception handler.
thanks for your interest and help in advance.
Cyborg_0912

A small clarification in Exception handling

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for