ABC Analysis with Standard Cost

Dear Experts,
Is there a standard ABC analysis report for parts that has only standard cost?
Pls advise, Thanks
Pri

you can try usage based abc analysis through mc40.
expects points from you

Similar Messages

CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

Dear Members,
The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
Any help/clues?
Regards
Satya

Hi,
In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
regards
Waman

Issue with Standard Cost estimates / Material Ledger

Background:
We have been using SAP for the last 5 years with Material Ledger active. Due to a number of reasons, we have not revised its standard cost estimates from 2001 till now. This means that at month end, we do not mark and release prices as recommended, nor do we mark prices and use dynamic release.
What Happened:
A new material called PFSW3 was made. This is a FERT. Before production
could start my team released the standard cost estimate for this material. Production was now able to proceed without problem. Then, when the time came to sell the material (VF02), SAP again raised the error 'cost estimate not found'. On checking the standard price in MM03, we discovered that the future cost estimate was missing. So we created and marked a new cost estimate in the middle of February 2007.
Problem:
When the first sale took place, SAP released the marked cost estimate and posted a Price Change document to adjust for the new standard cost. I understand this was due to dynamic release. Now, when month end came, the system settled all the production orders of material PFSW3 but did not do multi level costing on it.
Internal Investigation:
My team has determined that the material PFSW3 has price determination 2 set by mistake. All our other production materials (HALB and FERT) are
set to price determination 3 in the material master (accounting view).
Questions:
To sum this situation up,
we need to know why the material PFSW3 was not marked closed in its period status (CKM3) at the time of closing through CKMLCP?
What are the implications of not closing this material in Feb 2007 (current period status is showing 'Quantities and values entered')?
How can we close this material this month?
The future cost estimate is again missing for PFSW3 in March 2007 and I
fear we are going to face more problems as this material is sold to customers.
Please respond this is an urgent issue.

Dear Shumyl,
Please, have a look at Note 645083 - Material period status set to "Closing Entry Completed" that might help to closing your material in previous period.
Hope it will be useful.
Regards,
Flaviano.

Mass inventory revaluation with standard cost

My client uses standard cost and has one primary supplier. The supplier issues a new cost list the first of the year. The client receives a massive spreadsheet with 10000+ item changes.
Is there a way to import a batch of changes to Inventory Valuation as one does with the StockTaking destination for opening balances?

Cindy,
For changing the cost of an item you would use the DTW templates inside oMaterialRevaluation folder in DTW.
You have to remember couple of things before you do this.
If you already have inventory in stock for an item and their cost gets changed then, the Material Revaluation would post the difference to the Variance Account.
Is this what you would do? I am giving below the sample for the DTW.
MaterialRevaluation (Header template)
RecordKey....DocDate
1..................20071210
MaterialRevaluation_lines (Lines template)
RecordKey....ItemCode.....Price......Quantity....WarehouseCode
1......................PCB1........11.00............................01
1......................PCB1........11.00............................02
1......................ATG1........10.50............................01
NOTE: If you have the same item in mutiple warehouses then you will have to add a line for each warehouse
Please let me know
Suda

Production Order with Standard Costing

Hai
How to activate check point
If standard cost (Price control -"S") is less then 0 in material master then production Order can not creae.
Dharmesh Soni

Hi Soni
As AMIT said this can only be solved only by User exit.
This user exit will pop up error message during plan order to prod order conversion while saving or during saving prod order when it is manually created.
This user exit will look whether the standard cost estimate has been run for the header material of prod order and will not allow you to save the prod order.
Regards
J . Saravan

UOM Conversions and Standard Cost Variances

If we have the right Unit of Measure conversion defined, with standard cost in FEET and the PO ordered in METERS, will the standard cost variance calculate properly? That is, will it take into consideration a different standard cost when calculating a Purchase Price Variance?
thanks for your response,
Pam

Thanks for reply. Can I use the following sequence:
1. Opening MM period for the month of Feb on 1st Feb (so I can release cost estimate on Feb 1)
2. Marking and releasing cost esitmate on Feb 1 (this will revalue the closing stock as well)
3. FI & MM closing activities on Feb 1 & Feb 2, though postings in Jan is required.
4. CO distribution and CO-PA Assessment Cycles on Feb 1 & 2 (after FI & MM closing)
Please notice some Jan activities in Feb after cost estimate of Feb. Please comment if you suggest something else
regards
Chris

Material Ledger - Actual / Standard costing

Hi Experts, we need some help in material price determination with material ledger. Due to local regulations, we need to have our material master with price control determination valued to V in local currency, however, due to IFRS regulations, we need to post the group currency (USD) with standard costing.
We've already configured opposite way (local/group currency with price control S and calculation of actual costing with CKMLCP for previous period) but we need something similar for local currency in V price determination.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.

Thanks for your response. Yes, CKMLCP will change the price control to V but we need this price in every operation in local currency (price determination 2). Now, in material ledger, we need to post the standard price (by operation or adjusting with a process at the end of the period). This is the scenario that you are saying but backwards.

Standard cost per sales order

Dear experts!
I am facing with unresolved & unreasonable issue as follow:
We have one material number - FG 800000001 and has standard cost released with
      - Standard price: 130 USD release on: 27.10.2011
      - Standard price: 101 USD release on: 02.11.2010
And having two production orders of this FG:
     - Production order: 300TZ created on 27.10.2011, released on 28.10.2011
     - Production order: 301TZ also created on 27.10.2011, released on 28.10.2011
But at the time of GR confirmation; the system got standard price differently for two orders with the same posting date 15.10.2011 and same entry date: 27.10.2011)
    - Production order: 300TZ generated GR posting for FG with standard cost: 130 USD
    - But for order: 301TZ generated GR posting for FG with standard cost: 101 USD --> why this can be happened ?
And the production order 301TZ had been assigned for Sales order 9090000 (SO creation at 17.10.2011), in this sales order the condition type VPRS Internal price had been automatically updated with price: 101 USD, and the FI posting for GR also get 101USD --> This situation has been appeared many time up to now and we still not get the reasonable answers for users. Please raise any of your opinion, and get points with helpful contributions!
Best regards;
Trish   :->

Hi
You said Price released in 2010 is 101 and Price released in 2011 (Oct 27) is 130
So it might have happened that you posted the GR for 301TZ before 300 TZ and also before releasing the Std Cost on Oct 27th.. Hence, it got posted with 101 i.e. Price released in 2010
Now you released the cost on Oct 27th.. But note that any cost you release, is always released from the 1st of the month... i.e. in this case Oct 1st 2011
Now you posted GR for 300TZ on 27th Oct with Posting date of 15 Oct.. But system would take 130 because thats the price released from 1st of the month
This behaviour is exactly as designed and cant be changed...
br, Ajay M

Analysis report for standard cost in CK33N

Hi,
Analysis report for standard cost
Using variant Z003 in CK11N.
Planned cost 3 is the output used for planning and this is adjusted by making changes to the BOM throughout the process
In CK33 you compare the 2011 cost for the product with the proposed cost for the next year. For some parts it works and for others it splits the lines, though the calculation is still correct.
Regards,
T.Harish Kumar

Hi Revital,
I believe the last option is correct.
Thanks,
Gordon

Problem with rounding in standard cost estimate.

Hi All,
Happy 4th of July!
I have a problem with the standard cost estimate where the system try to calculate overhead costs (from costing sheet) with a fix percentage (9.7%) to the value coming from material consumption costs element.
Let say I have $1.71 material consumption and the overhead rate of 9.7%
The real calculation should be (1.71*0.097) = $0.16587
But at CK11N screen, it shows only $0.16 (two decimal rounding)
Is there a way that I can bump the rounding to at least 3 decimal point to make it more accurate?
Very appreciate any input you guys can share. Thank you.
Charitha

Hi Chari ,
My experience says that you can use only 2 decimals ..
Moreover , please have a look into SAP Note : 639410 - CK11N, CK13N: Message CK869 due to rounding
differences.
There a some source code corrections also on rounding differences- check if it helps you also...
Regards
Sarada

Copy standard cost with Cost Component from another material

Hi,
I need to copy standard cost from another material not only total price but also details of cost component split. I try to used transaction CKUC with procedure of "explode material cost estimate" but the reference material use "mixed costing" and isystem stop explosion.
There is another procedure in order to make this copy? I can not use special procurement because are different codes (material A / Plant XXX copy froma material B /Plant XXX).
Thanks for your support.
Mic

Hi Chandra,
thanks for your suggestion, it works but only if I explode a level ... material "B" contains two mix codes that also contain their mixes. So system shows this message "Mixed cost estimate explosion in level 2 for material xxx" and "Mixed cost estimate exists: maximum of 2 explosion level (s) possible".
So Is not possible to copy and esploded a standard cost with multi level mix?
Thanks
Michela

Purchase Price Variance (Standard Costing) with Intercompany

We are missing Intercompany transactions in Purchase price variance report. Is there a setup which let's us include these transactions to be captured by PPV report
We do have standard costing in all Organizations

Finally got this answered from Oracle Support below is what they said. Does not make sense but atleast we have an answer
In principle the internal requisition hits the interorg variance account which is defined at the shipping network and is different from purchase price variance(PPV) account of the organization. So this is not included in PPV report. PPV report is only meant for purchase orders.
Best practice would be to define different account for PPV and interorg variance. Use PPV report to match PPV account with GL and use material distribution account detail report for Interorg variance.
If the customer defines PPV and Interorg variance account as the same then the workarounds would be :
1) Use material distribution account detail report.
Or
2) In R12 use SLA account balance reports

Standard cost with material with alternate BOM and Routing

I have a set up where the same material can be manufactured in 2 different production lines and each production line has two different BOMs and Routings. If I want to have a blended standard cost for the material what are our options?
We do not want to do split valuation.
thanks a lot

Hi
You can different PCC (Product cost collector) for both lines of the same product (Product cost by period).
You can define a production process within a product cost collector for each line of production with a combination of BOM and Routing. TCode KKF6n. It would generate a order number for each production process.
You can use each order within the PCC for each production line to capture the costs for seperate lines.
Regards,
Suraj

Self defined standard analysis with intercompany

Hello all,
we are going to begin the intercompany flows. At this moment, SD dpt, has a Self defined standard analysis (MCSI s-tcode) with sales stadistic data.
My problem is that with intercompany invoice we won't have a sales document. Flow is:
Purchase order - delivery - MIGO - invoice - MIRO.
Because of that in my MCSI i lose intercompany orders. We have another standard analysis with invoices, but intercompany invoices doesn't appears at all.
Some ideas? User guides? Someone who use intercompany with MCSI?
Thanks.

Dear Friend,
What I can understand from you is intercompany transactions are nto taking place its solely done through MM
If you want some standard process of Intercompany Transaction Visit this link of the BEST PRACTICES>
http://help.sap.com/bp_blv1600/V5600/BL_DE/html/index.htm
regards,
SAP SD

Raw materials on MAP with split valuation used in standard cost estimate

We have a few raw materials which are purchased from different vendors and of different brands. We have opened split valuations for these raw materials. These raw materials are later used in manufacture of different finished goods. We use MAP for raw materials and Std. for finished goods. What configuration and processing steps will be required to run standards cost estimate and what will be standard price for a finished good considering the following example:
Material X is finished good
Raw Material A with split valuation @ USD 5 (brand aplha) & USD 10 (brand beta)
Raw Material B without split valuation @ USD 1
It is expected that we used brand aplha 60% of the time and brand beta 40% of the time and production batch size is usually 100 Kg.
Please reply
Edited by: Chris SAP on Sep 29, 2011 7:56 AM

hi chris
Hope you have configured the material A for split valuation. while calculating standard cost estimate for the material C. through ck11n, the system will pick up the header price from material master.
But here you are saying that you have chances of using the material A, 60% of brand alpha and 40% brand beta
Instead of using split valuation use mixed costing concept. create the material A with separate Ids and create two boms one with alpha and the other with beta.
create procurement alternative in CK91N and mixed ratio with Ck94 and release the mixed cost estimate
please go through this thread also
Re: Difference between Split Valuation and Mixed Costing
Krishna

ABC Analysis with Standard Cost

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for