Mass inventory revaluation with standard cost

My client uses standard cost and has one primary supplier. The supplier issues a new cost list the first of the year. The client receives a massive spreadsheet with 10000+ item changes.
Is there a way to import a batch of changes to Inventory Valuation as one does with the StockTaking destination for opening balances?

Cindy,
For changing the cost of an item you would use the DTW templates inside oMaterialRevaluation folder in DTW.
You have to remember couple of things before you do this. 
If you already have inventory in stock for an item and their cost gets changed then, the Material Revaluation would post the difference to the Variance Account.
Is this what you would do?    I am giving below the sample for the DTW.
MaterialRevaluation (Header template)
RecordKey....DocDate
1..................20071210
MaterialRevaluation_lines (Lines template)
RecordKey....ItemCode.....Price......Quantity....WarehouseCode
1......................PCB1........11.00............................01
1......................PCB1........11.00............................02
1......................ATG1........10.50............................01
NOTE: If you have the same item in mutiple warehouses then you will have to add a line for each warehouse
Please let me know
Suda

Similar Messages

  • CO-PA Cost Component do not match with Standard Cost Component Values

    Dear Members,
    The CO-PA Cost Components (as mapped through KE4R), do not match with Standard Cost Component values for the Group Currency. In local currency the values match.
    System is correctly picking up VPRS value, both in local currency and Group Currency, which is equal to the total of Standard Cost Components however, it is the Value Fields linked to the Standard Cost Components in Group Currency that do not match.
    In KE40, the Indicator is 4:Released Standard Cost Estimate matching Goods issue Date.
    I have verified KEPH/CKMLPKEPH tables. The values are same as that of VPRS.
    Any help/clues?
    Regards
    Satya

    Hi,
    In case of billing documents the group valuation approach is managed in the data structures of the legal valuation in additional value fields. To control costs and revenues in the different views separately, you must create additional value fields and assign them to the data structures.
    The field contents must be filled via the CO-PA user exit, they cannot be entered by assigning conditions to value fields. The profit center valuation is updated in a separate ledger. No separate value fields are necessary.
    The exit to be used is function module 'EXIT_SAPLKEII_002' ( enhancement COPA0005 ). Within the exit you have the complete SD data avaialble in the tables 'T_ACCIT' and 'T_ACCCR'. The conditions can be found in T_ACCIT and the corresponding values ( linked via 'POSNR' ) in table T_ACCCR. The PA line item and the corresponding SD item in table ACCIT
    can be mapped via the line item field 'RPOSN' and the field 'POSNR_SD' in table ACCIT.
    regards
    Waman

  • Issue with Standard Cost estimates / Material Ledger

    Background:
    We have been using SAP for the last 5 years with Material Ledger active. Due to a number of reasons, we have not revised its standard cost estimates from 2001 till now. This means that at month end, we do not mark and release prices as recommended, nor do we mark prices and use dynamic release.
    What Happened:
    A new material called PFSW3 was made. This is a FERT. Before production
    could start my team released the standard cost estimate for this material. Production was now able to proceed without problem. Then, when the time came to sell the material (VF02), SAP again raised the error 'cost estimate not found'. On checking the standard price in MM03, we discovered that the future cost estimate was missing. So we created and marked a new cost estimate in the middle of February 2007.
    Problem:
    When the first sale took place, SAP released the marked cost estimate and posted a Price Change document to adjust for the new standard cost. I understand this was due to dynamic release. Now, when month end came, the system settled all the production orders of material PFSW3 but did not do multi level costing on it.
    Internal Investigation:
    My team has determined that the material PFSW3 has price determination 2 set by mistake. All our other production materials (HALB and FERT) are
    set to price determination 3 in the material master (accounting view).
    Questions:
    To sum this situation up,
    we need to know why the material PFSW3 was not marked closed in its period status (CKM3) at the time of closing through CKMLCP?
    What are the implications of not closing this material in Feb 2007 (current period status is showing 'Quantities and values entered')?
    How can we close this material this month?
    The future cost estimate is again missing for PFSW3 in March 2007 and I
    fear we are going to face more problems as this material is sold to customers.
    Please respond this is an urgent issue.

    Dear Shumyl,
    Please, have a look at Note 645083 - Material period status set to "Closing Entry Completed" that might help to closing your material in previous period.
    Hope it will be useful.
    Regards,
    Flaviano.

  • ABC Analysis with Standard Cost

    Dear Experts,
    Is there a standard ABC analysis report for parts that has only standard cost?
    Pls advise, Thanks
    Pri

    you can try usage based abc analysis through mc40.
    expects points from you

  • Production Order with Standard Costing

    Hai
    How to activate check point
    If standard cost (Price control -"S") is less then 0 in material master then production Order can not creae.
    Dharmesh Soni

    Hi Soni
    As AMIT said this can only be solved only by User exit.
    This user exit will pop up error message during plan order to prod order conversion while saving or during saving prod order when it is manually created.
    This user exit will look whether the standard cost estimate has been run for the header material of prod order and will not allow you to save the prod order.
    Regards
    J . Saravan

  • FX Revaluation with default Cost Object Assignment

    Hello,
    When we run the FX revaluation program FAGL_FC_Val, SAP books one side to
    the balance sheet account and the other side to the P&L account for
    unrealized FX Loss/Gain. Since this account is also created as a cost
    element, it requires a cost object. However, FX revaluation program posts
    the entry without a cost object. We have tcode OKB9 - Default Cost Center
    Assignment but SAP does not take values from it.
    We are on ECC 6.0
    Any assistance is sincerely appreciated.
    sumit

    Hi,
    if the P&L account for unrealized FX Loss/gain is created as cost element a posting can only take place if there is a cost object assigned.
    You wrote "However, FX revaluation program posts the entry without a cost object" but thats not possible. There must be a cost object, maybe not the one you are expecting...
    Maybe the OKB9 entry is maintained for comp. code A the FX valuation is done for comp. code B? Maybe there is a substituion rule created that changes the OKB9 default cost object?
    Please check, and come back.
    best regards, Christian

  • DTW Template for Inventory Revaluation

    Hi experts,
    Please allow me to ask one funny/stupid question?
    Which template should I use to upload data for Inventory Revaluation?
    Is it oMaterialRevaluation?
    Please tell me.

    Hi Tou,
    Check the link
    Re: Mass inventory revaluation with standard cost
    Re: Inventory Revaluation
    Regards
    jambulingam.P

  • UOM Conversions and Standard Cost Variances

    If we have the right Unit of Measure conversion defined, with standard cost in FEET and the PO ordered in METERS, will the standard cost variance calculate properly? That is, will it take into consideration a different standard cost when calculating a Purchase Price Variance?
    thanks for your response,
    Pam

    Thanks for reply. Can I use the following sequence:
    1. Opening MM period for the month of Feb on 1st Feb (so I can release cost estimate on Feb 1)
    2. Marking and releasing cost esitmate on Feb 1 (this will revalue the closing stock as well)
    3. FI & MM closing activities on Feb 1 & Feb 2, though postings in Jan is required.
    4. CO distribution and CO-PA Assessment Cycles on Feb 1 & 2 (after FI & MM closing)
    Please notice some Jan activities in Feb after cost estimate of Feb. Please comment if you suggest something else
    regards
    Chris

  • Standard Cost vs Moving Average

    Hi all,
    I'm wondering if someone can explain with a bit more detail how SBO handles standard cost.
    I know how to set it up and why it's there, but I'm curious how some clients use it and their procedures around managing it.
    How do auditors react to it, does it require more work to maintain, is there anything in SBO to help manage the adjustment of variances?
    If I switch some finished BOM inventory items to standard cost will there be any long term negative effects such as over/understated revenue?
    TIA,
    Mike

    Hi Mike,
    Revenue is not affected by the type of valuation method you choose for the Item, the Gross Profit as reported in the Sales Analysis might be affected if there is a large deviation between the standard and tha actual cost.
    Either way, if you have set your accounts correct (= P&L accounts in the right place), in the long run the Gross Profit as it is reported in your income statement (profit and loss) will be correct (the same) with both Standard or Moving Average.
    There might be a slight variance between the 2 depending on the cut off point and on the actual variance. You could expect a larger amount of the COGS (= variance being a part of COGS) being posted at the time of the purchase than when dealing with a Moving Average Item.
    I hope that was somewhat clear...
    Anything unclear, ask again.
    Jesper

  • KE380 for finished good with released cost estimate

    Dear Gurus,
    We have following error.
    No product costing estimate could be found
    Message no. KE380
    Diagnosis
    In Profitability Analysis (CO-PA), the system tried to find a product cost estimate for product 20010412 in plant FA03 that uses costing variant LG01.
    The system looked for the cost estimate using costing key LG1 as defined in the CO-PA Customizing
    settings.
    System Response
    No estimate could be found.
    Procedure
    Check the settings for valuation using product costing. If necessary, create a product cost estimate for this product.
    The thing is this error occurs for materials with released cost estimate.
    Before we had error ke350 for all materials considering DIEN and ROH.
    After supressing the error in kepc we can release invoices with DIEN and ROH materials.
    But we got another ke380.
    How can we solve this issue?
    With best regards,
    Kamila.

    Hi,
    This type of errror is usual if costing based COPA is active and you are using Costing key to valuate the inventory using the Standard cost estimation.
    When the costing key is been configured in COPA to access the standard cost estimation and is accordingly assigned to material types, then when the billing is released to accounting system tries to find out the SCE in the material master to pass the COGM to COPA. If it doesnt find the same, it will throw the error.
    Hence, run SCE and update your material master.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ravi Kumar

  • Material Ledger - Actual / Standard costing

    Hi Experts, we need some help in material price determination with material ledger. Due to local regulations, we need to have our material master with price control determination valued to V in local currency, however, due to IFRS regulations, we need to post the group currency (USD) with standard costing.
    We've already configured opposite way (local/group currency with price control S and calculation of actual costing with CKMLCP for previous period) but we need something similar for local currency in V price determination.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks in advance.

    Thanks for your response. Yes, CKMLCP will change the price control to V but we need this price in every operation in local currency (price determination 2). Now, in material ledger, we need to post the standard price (by operation or adjusting with a process at the end of the period). This is the scenario that you are saying but backwards.

  • Standard cost per sales order

    Dear experts!
    I am facing with unresolved & unreasonable issue as follow:
    We have one material number - FG 800000001 and has standard cost released with
          - Standard price: 130 USD release on: 27.10.2011
          - Standard price: 101 USD release on: 02.11.2010
    And having two production orders of this FG:
         - Production order: 300TZ created on 27.10.2011, released on 28.10.2011
         - Production order: 301TZ also created on 27.10.2011, released on 28.10.2011
    But at the time of GR confirmation; the system got standard price differently for two orders with the same posting date 15.10.2011 and same entry date: 27.10.2011)
        - Production order: 300TZ generated GR posting for FG with standard cost: 130 USD
        - But for order: 301TZ generated GR posting for FG with standard cost: 101 USD --> why this can be happened ?
    And the production order 301TZ had been assigned for Sales order 9090000 (SO creation at 17.10.2011), in this sales order the condition type VPRS Internal price had been automatically updated with price: 101 USD, and the FI posting for GR also get 101USD --> This situation has been appeared many time up to now and we still not get the reasonable answers for users. Please raise any of your opinion, and get points with helpful contributions!
    Best regards;
    Trish   :->

    Hi
    You said Price released in 2010 is 101 and Price released in 2011 (Oct 27) is 130
    So it might have happened that you posted the GR for 301TZ before 300 TZ and also before releasing the Std Cost on Oct 27th.. Hence, it got posted with 101 i.e. Price released in 2010
    Now you released the cost on Oct 27th.. But note that any cost you release, is always released from the 1st of the month... i.e. in this case Oct 1st 2011
    Now you posted GR for 300TZ on 27th Oct with Posting date of 15 Oct.. But system would take 130 because thats the price released from 1st of the month
    This behaviour is exactly as designed and cant be changed...
    br, Ajay M

  • How do I revalue inventory for change in cost?

    Hi,
    How do I revalue inventory for change in cost? BOM exists for manufactured Portland cement, backflusing relieves inventory per this BOM, however, old cost still appears as valuation for this product. I did a cost estimate for this product (2000000004), marked, and released this product. Effective date of this BOM was 07/01/2009.
    kindly help me
    Thanks
    Suvarna

    Dear Suvarna,
    Once after taking a new released cost estimate for a product,it's stock gets automatically revaluated as per the new price or
    say new value.
    Can you please confirm whether in the accounting view of the material master you are able to see the last price change date is
    same as your cost estimate date.Only then it means the new price was marked and stamped properly and based on the new
    standard price the stock get's valuated automatically.
    There is no other transaction required for this process.
    Check and revert back with your further queries.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • Material Ledger,Revaluation Production Cost Center ,Standard Cost

    Hi, I have a problem with  revaluation of production cost centers.
    Firstly,  production cost center expenses are settled via activity types onto the production order at the end of the period. However,  CKMLCP revaluate cost centers after the settlement because of using standard price. So cost centers at the end of the period have some amount.
    As a result we can not find  actual price for production orders.
    If I use standard cost in order to consume on cost centers, material ledger revaluates again this cost centers. I dont want this condition. Because this cost center is settled to other cost object before closing.  
    Thanks.
    Message was edited by:
            Ergul Taslacioglu

    Hi
    Go to the following path in SPRO:
    Controlling -> Product Cost Controlling -> Actual Costing/Material Ledger -> Actual Costing -> Activate Actual  Costing. Double-click on "Actiavte Actual Costing" and change the indicator from "2" to "1".

  • Problem with rounding in standard cost estimate.

    Hi All,
    Happy 4th of July!
    I have a problem with the standard cost estimate where the system try to calculate overhead costs (from costing sheet) with a fix percentage (9.7%) to the value coming from material consumption costs element.
    Let say I have $1.71 material consumption and the overhead rate of 9.7%
    The real calculation should be (1.71*0.097) = $0.16587
    But at CK11N screen, it shows only $0.16 (two decimal rounding)
    Is there a way that I can bump the rounding to at least 3 decimal point to make it more accurate?
    Very appreciate any input you guys can share. Thank you.
    Charitha

    Hi Chari ,
    My experience says that you can use only 2 decimals ..
    Moreover , please have a look into SAP Note : 639410 - CK11N, CK13N: Message CK869 due to rounding
    differences.
    There a some source code corrections also on rounding differences- check if it helps you also...
    Regards
    Sarada

Maybe you are looking for

  • Image Column in Tableview

    Hi all, here's the thing: I'm trying to add an image column to a tableview but it doesn't work (there's no error, but the image doesn't appear). I've tried it with an iterator. Page Layout: <%@page language="abap" %> <%@extension name="htmlb" prefix=

  • Number of workdays per month

    Hello guys, How do i calculate number of workdays: 1. per a month (Variable) 2. per a month until a date (Variable) Do i need user exit or can i use a formula? Thanks, Maya

  • Optimizing the query performance?

    When I run this query it takes 2-3 hours to bring the data. It pulls the data starting 2008 december. How can I optimize the performance for the below query? SELECT e1.Eventdate, TO_CHAR( TO_DATE (e1.eventdate, 'mmddyyyy, ), 'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS' )

  • Nokia N9: Restoring NBU backup

    Hello good people, My Nokia N9 was experiencing strange behaviour lately, so i decided to back it up using Nokia Suite. The backup was full; contacts, meassages, documents, songs,.... Now trying to restore, the only options it's giving me is to resto

  • How do to do a full backup?

    Apple has a recall on my mac's hard drive.  They have asked me to back up my hard drive before they replace it.. The problem is  i have never done a backup,  Can anyone explain to me what it is i need to do exactly?  Please be as specific as possible