Account Based PA Billing Qty

Hello Guruu2019s:
If I have multiple condition types in a pricing procedure, when I release billing to accounting in account based PA, I see Sales Qty associated with the account mapped to first condition type in my procedure. Is there anyway to replicate billing qty to all Accounts mapped in account based PA?
Regards
Raghu

Hi,
Please read the note 160011. It explains how you can change the standard behavior in this regard.
I quote from the note:
"customer can influence the quantity update in CO in the SD user exit for the G/L account item (EXIT_SAPLV60B_004): Set indicator XACCIT-XMFRW (quantities in accounting) to 'X' for all rows of the accounting document (structure ACCIT), for which the quantity should be updated in CO. "
Please test this throughly in test system and see if it meets your requirements.
regards
Waman

Similar Messages

COPA account based extractor (Bill type field FKART) missing

Hello Experts,
I am new to COPA and currently working on account based COPA DataSource on ECC 6.0 & BI 7.0.
I have created the DataSource in KEB0 for account based by selecting the appropriate operating concern. One of the field requirements for me is to have billing doc type but it is not available in KEB0 or in RSA6.
When checked in KEA0 billing type (FKART) is available as display fixed fields.
Main menu -> extras -> display fixed fields.
Could you please let me know how to get this part of my DataSource?
Does enhancing the DataSource is only the solution?
Highly appreciate your help.
Best Regards
VJ

Hi Vijay!
If your current scenario does not present you with the standard extractor from the source system, perhaps you should try to create a generic datasource for your business requirements.

Qty from VA88 Settlement for Account based copa

Hi Gurus,
I have a question on VA88 in MTO-E scenario. In account based copa the qty will update in Delivery. In MTO-E Scenario there is no accounting entries in Delivery(PGI).
Is there any way to derive Billing qty in Settlement.(VA88)
Thanks
Vasanth K.

Hi Castles
It depends on your segment level chars in KEQ3.... Suppose you defined Customre and Product as Seg Levle CHar
Each time you enter a new Cust or Prod in sales order - The record will be written to CE4 and a new PSG no would be generated... Next tieme when you enter same Cust / Prod - Same PSG would be used
If you see carefully in KEQ3 - Sale order is not a segment level char by default.. hence, Sales order is not written in CE4
However, you can see it in table CE4xxxx_ACCT
Regarding jumping no.s you can refer table SNRO and check your buffer... your basis guys should help in this
In Account based COPA, PSG is determined at sale order itself.. refer note 1351257 for more details
Regards
Ajay M

Urgent : Bill Qty based on Fisrt day of Previous week to current week

Hi,
I have to create a Restricted Key figure.
Bill Qty is to be restricted on a day, which is first day of previous week.
(1) I have restricted KF, with Current Week SAP exit variable.
(2) Restricted KF, with Calendar Day (Variable ZDATE, customer exit type).
(3) I have written Customer Exit in CMOD...
data: LT_RANGE type RSR_S_RANGESID,
      LS_VAR_RANGE like RRRANGEEXIT.
case i_vnam.
when 'ZDATE'.
if i_step = 2.
break-point.
loop at i_t_var_range into ls_var_range where vnam = '0CWEEK'.
data: var1(2) type c,
      var2(4) type c,
      var3 LIKE SCAL-WEEK,
      date1 like scal-date,
      DATE2(10) TYPE C,
      MNTH(2) TYPE C,
      DAY(2) TYPE C,
      YEAR(4) TYPE C.
var1 = ls_var_range-low(2).
var2 = ls_var_range-low(4).
concatenate var2 var1 into var3.
CALL FUNCTION 'WEEK_GET_FIRST_DAY'
EXPORTING
    WEEK               = var3
IMPORTING
   DATE               = date1
EXCEPTIONS
WEEK_INVALID       = 1
OTHERS             = 2
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
        WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
MNTH = DATE1+4(2).
DAY = DATE1+6(2).
YEAR = DATE1+0(4).
CONCATENATE DAY '/' MNTH '/' YEAR INTO DATE2.
lt_range-low = date2.
lt_range-high = date2.
lt_range-sign = 'I'.
lt_range-opt = 'eq'.
append lt_range to e_t_range.
endloop.
endif.
<b>BUT I AM GETTING ERROR -</b>
00010004              AError for variable in customer enhancement ZDATE
Please suggest any idea..
Thanks
saurabh

Hi Saurabh,
Please try this dample code
WHEN 'ZDATE'.
DATA: Z_WEEK TYPE SCAL-WEEK.
*Determine current week from SY-DATUM
        CALL FUNCTION 'DATE_GET_WEEK'
          EXPORTING
            DATE               = SY-DATUM
          IMPORTING
            WEEK               = Z_WEEK.
*Determine first day of current week
        CALL FUNCTION 'WEEK_GET_FIRST_DAY'
          EXPORTING
            WEEK = Z_WEEK
          IMPORTING
            DATE = LT_RANGE-LOW.
LT_RANGE-SIGN = 'I'.
LT_RANGE-OPT = 'eq'.
APPEND LT_RANGE TO E_T_RANGE.
Regards
Joe

Quantity in Account Based COPA upon WBS Settlement

Hi All
I am facing an issue with the quantity flow into Account Based COPA.
We have activated account based COPA and we use sales orders/billing and also Projects.
When I am creating sales order (no reference to WBS), delivery against sales order and billing from delivery, I see that
quantity posted in Delivery document and quantity from billing document are transferred to account based COPA along with GL postings.
But when I am creating sales orders with account assignment of WBS, then all the delivered quantity and billed quantity
are posted to WBS elements along with the FI postings. Receiver on my WBS is COPA segment.
When I settle the WBS that carry both revenues and costs (COGS to be sepcific), I see that amounts are settled correctly with
right GL accounts into account based COPA, but I do not see that quantities getting transferred.
I know how we can transfer quantities using costing based COPA during settlement (using PA Transfer structure with Qty setting), but
not sure how it works in account based COPA for settlements.
Any thoughts on how to transfer quantities from WBS settlement to account based COPA.
Your help is much appreciated
Thanks
Rama

Hello Rama,
First of all, I want to give you with note 352610 some general
information about the update of quantities in CO. For further
analyses I would recommand you report RKACSHOW where you can
find the relevant tables you can take a look, f.e. table COKA,
COSS(A) and COSS(A). Probabely in table COKA the field 'MEINH'
is not filled.
Furthermore I want to provide you note 27922 which explains in detail
the system behaviour for settlements in this case.
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/352610
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/27922
Thanks and best regards,
Ronghua Fan

Diffrence in incomming order qty and billing qty in cube 0sd_c03 & 0sd_c01

Dear All.
i have uploaded 2 cubes 0SD_C01 & 0SD_C01 from our R/3 data, SAP recommed for 0SD_C03 for sales analysis and their best practice is also based on 0SD_C03 but it is very strange the values of both the cubes are not the same when i run the report but the values of 0SD_C01 is 100% same as R/3 values i.e. mcsi reports show the same incomming and billing qty as i can see in report for 0SD_C01 but strang to see in 0SD_C03 there is diffrence in these values.
can any one explain why did this happen as SAP recommed to use lbwe data sources and their best practice also base on 0SD_C03 and the other one i.e. 0SD_C01 is based on old LIS structures.
during exploration i come to know that in some material orders incomming and billing quantaties are same but diffrence in most of them.
any help will be highly appreciated.
thanks & best regards,
Zeeshan

Hi,
There are somany Routines for Keyfigures in both Cubes, I hope you may using 0QUANT_B key figure for Qty, the reason is there may be some difernece in Routines in both cubes, so you need to check it tehn you check in teh reports, whether is there any restrictions, you need to iopen the each node and check i nthe both reports.
I also faced teh same problem with MCSI and BW reports, MCSI, we can customizi it an dut is just InfoStructure and having routines internally. So you need to take one material, plant and date where the diffrenece is coming then track it.
Check OSS NOTES:
Note 166996 - BW InfoCube 0SD_C03: incorrect incoming order qty
Note 1156259 - Update rules incorrect for InfoCube 0SD_C03
Thanks
Reddy
Edited by: Surendra Reddy on Aug 10, 2009 7:19 AM

Third Party Orders not appearing in billing due list. Item Cat billing rel 'F' & VTFA Billing Qty E

I had a requirement to do my customer billing for third party scenario before doing the invoice verification.
The solution that was proposed was to make the following changes,
In VOV7 (For TAS )item category the billing relevance should be (G) and
in the copy control VTFA at item level for item cat (TAS)maintain the billing qty(E).
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3522580
The problem I faced with the above config change was that nothing was appearing in the billing due list and when I tried to do a billing from the order directly, it would not let me.
Then I made the following change,
In VOV7 (For TAS )item category the billing relevance as (F) and
in the copy control VTFA at item level for item cat (TAS)maintained the billing qty(E).
Now after the MIGO is done based on the PO, the system allows me to do a customer billing from the SO before the invoice verification. But still this SO is still not appearing in the billing due list. Have any of you experts faced the same problem? How can I get this to appear in the billing due list? Or in other words, how do I identify open third party sales orders that are due for billing?
Thanks and regards
ES

@ Joan, in that case invoice verification would now be necessary anymore right? In my case i need the invoice verification to happen...but at a later stage
With the existing config...i.e. F as billing relevance and E as billing quantity, I now tried doing a MIRO immediately after the MIGO and then it appears in the billing due list. So basically I think its the billing relevance F...and if I want it to come in VFO4 before MIRO, perhaps a tweak in the logic of VFO4 to include billing relevance F + billing quantity E ?

How to get general account for a billing document ( BSEG) ?

Hello,
For a billing document to a client , We need to get the general account for each item of the invoice . We based on the field XBLNR of table VBRK to select a document from BKPF with condition : VBRK-XBLNR = BKPF-vbeln . If yes we will get from table BSEG for bseg-vbeln = bkpf-vbeln and bseg-posnr = vbrk-posnr . then get HKONT.
But as you know BSEG is a cluster table, Select directly from this table is extremly long and seems impossible in our case. Could you please show me the way to do this ?
Our main purpose is to get HKONT ( General account ) for a billing document .
Thanks in advance for your help

Hi Hoa Binh Xanh,
Why don't you look into tables BSAD and BSID (Transperant Tables) rather directly hitting BSEG ( Cluster Table)
Pass VBELN (Billing Document) in above two tables and get the doucment numbers and then if you need further info hit BSEG with the data you got from BSAD and BSID
OR else Pass KOART = 'D' while selecting data from BSEG it will help in improving performance
Hope it will solve your problem..
Thanks & Regards
ilesh 24x7
ilesh Nandaniya

Activating Account based Copa in the existing Cost-based COPA

Hi Sap CO gurus!
Please advise me for the following issue.
Presently, My client using Cost-based COPA for segment wise reporting.( Already activated).
Now they wanted the reports in Account Based. Is it possible to activate the Account based now? Will the system allow us to activate or not?
If yes, What will be the implications? I want to know the pros and cons for that.
If not, How Can I edit the COPA settings( Operating concern)? Or shall I delete the Operating concern and create one new one?
Can you please explain the impact of each situation?
Thanks a lot in advance
Rama

Hi Joe
You can deactivate Account Based COPA, but you will have to do a thorough testing so that you are aware of the issues that can crop up
The IMG Menu is SPRO > Controlling > Prof Analysis
You will have to do a testing of how the open sales orders would behave... The open sales orders mean Sales Orders where PGI has been done, but billing is pending AS WELL AS Sales orders which are just created, but no Logistics movement (PGI) has taken place... You will have to do testing on both types of sales orders
- When you do PGI after deactivating the account based COPA, you may face error. Because, COGS GL account is a cost element in Account based COPA, where as in Costing based COPA, it is usually not a Cost Element
- Also do a billing from an open sales order and see if you get any error there...
Similar issue can arise during variance settlement also, because the variance account is not a cost ele in Costing Based COPA.
Test out the above scenarios and do share your experiences
Regards
Ajay M

Account Based COPA Cost of goods sold and Revenue Split

Dear Experts,
We are using account based copa in a automobile company.
As per the requirement when a car is sold, depending on the customer request the car goes for a conversion. like adding Radio, Seat cover, etc
As per our setup we have different profit centers for vehicle and Parts(radio, seat cover etc) and in this case radio, seat cover, etc are the classes of the material vehicle(not separate material).
After the vehicle conversion there is a sales order raised which goes to profit center derived from vehicle material master.
As per the reporting requirement I need to spit the Cost of good sold and revenue by vehicle profit center and parts profit center for COPA reporting purpose
Is there any way to do this in standard SAP? Or I need an exit?
Appreciate your response and please let me know in case of any clarification.
Many thanks
Roy
Edited by: roy001 on Aug 4, 2011 4:52 PM

For those who may need an answer to this, our solution was the following:
1)       Created new types for SO, SO Item, Sched. Line, Delivery, Delivery Item, Billing type
2)       Created new Pricing procedure
3)       Created new movement type Y61/Y62 modeled after 601/602
4)       Mapped Y61/Y62 to account modifier ZAX.
5)       Mapped GBB/ZAX to the new account.
Benefits, they now have better view of the orders going inter-company. It is flexible enough to adjusting prices for intercompany separate from standard orders, even though for now it is a straight copy of cost. They are able to remove the sales/use tax, from the calculations. They are able to plan with these orders separated out. Plus, this will standardize their process for inter-company.
Hope this helps someone.
Cheers!
Rick

What is the purpose of account based COPA when we have FSVs

Hi,
I noted the information we can get from account based copa is exactly the same as the information we can get from financial statement version reports. As such why do we need account based copa for?
What info i can get in account based copa that i cannot get from FSV reports?
help.sap.com

Hi,
   Information gets passed to account based COPA if the relevant G/L account is a cost element.
   However account based COPA uses PA segments. This information contained in the PA segment can be viewed via KE24
   To test this post a billing document using account based COPA. After that go to KE24 for account based COPA and check the report. You will see all the details which would not be available in any FI report. Basically the information available for reporting makes it worth using for account based COPA
regards
Waman

Account Based CO-PA Quantity Not updated in COEP-MEGBTR

Hello,
We use account based CO-PA. For certain Billing transactions, the quantity is not coming to the BW.
On analysis, we notice that the line item document created in COEP table is not updating the quantity field MEGBTR but only the field MBGBTR.
Not sure what is cuasing these transactions to post differently.
Thanks for your help. Murali

Could you please check note 105747, 911203, 353643 or 188724, This does not pertain to ECC6 but possibly earlier releases.

Profitability Analysis - Account based

Hello Expertise,
I was running COPA on Costing Based it was running sccessfully i was able to see the reflection in VF02.But now when i changed it to Accounting based i cannot see the reflection in VF02.
So please help me what extra settings i need to do for the reflection to be seen in VF02
Regards,
Khadeer

Hi,
See when i run the cycle from VA01 then VL01N and the VF01 the documents that got generated were
ACCOUNTING
PROFIT CENTER
CONTROLLING
PROFITTABILITY ANALYSIS
THIS IS WHEN I WAS RUNNING WITH COST BASED COPA.
Now when I set the COPA in KEKE to ACCOUNT BASED and also do the REQ change in KEA0 i.e mark only ACCOUNT BASED and regenerated again and Run the above cycle from VA01 to VL01n to VF01 the doc that got genrated
ACCOUNTING
PROFIT CENTER
CONTROLLING
I am not able to see the COPA during billing.
Regards,
Khadeer

Any functional module to get financial document based on billing document

hi all,
do we have any functional module to get accounting document (bseg-BELNR) based on billing document (bseg-VBELN)?
i have a requirement to retrieve the clearing document (bseg-augcp) & date(bseg-augdt) from BSEG with billing document.
billing document is not a key, so i would like to retrieve the accounting document from any function module and use that to get clearing document (bseg-augcp) & date(bseg-augdt).
thanks.

hi all,
i got other option to get this....thanks.
      select single * from bkpf
      where bukrs = <data>-werks
        and AWTYP = 'VBRK'
        and AWKEY = billing doc.
      if sy-subrc EQ 0.
        select single * from bseg
        where bukrs = bkpf-bukrs
          and belnr = bkpf-belnr
          and gjahr = bkpf-gjahr.
        if sy-subrc EQ 0.
          <data>-AUGDT = bseg-augdt.
          <data>-AUGBL = bseg-augbl.
        endif.

Post GL Accounts based on valauation class in EDI Postings

Hi,
We have a business requirement in intercompany billing postings. At the time of posting the account receivable posting through intercompany billing, system also post account payable posing based on the EDI settings. However standard EDI settings for determine GL Account is based on the vendor and company code not on the basis of valuation class. Hence, we need to determine the account payable gl accounts based on valuation class instead of GL Accounts assigned in EDI.
For that we through of using the Enhancement FEDI0001 and userexit EXIT_SAPLIEDI_001. However this exit is not trigerring while inbound idoc is processed.
Kindly advice how we need to process and whether we are using the right userexit or not.
Best Regards.,
Goutham

not answered

Account Based PA Billing Qty

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for